DiabetesPhase 3DUAL™ I JapanNCT02607306
A Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide, Insulin Degludec and Liraglutide in Japanese Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
A Phase 3 study testing insulin degludec/liraglutide, insulin degludec and liraglutide in people with Diabetes and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Novo Nordisk A/S at 76 sites in Japan.
Trial summary
This trial is conducted in Asia. The aim of this trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/liraglutide, insulin degludec and liraglutide in Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- What is being tested?
- insulin degludec/liraglutide, insulin degludec and liraglutide
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 819 participants
- Where
- 76 sitesJapan
- Study dates
- 18 Nov 2015to 22 Dec 2017
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female Japanese subjects, age at least 20 years at the time of signing informed consent
- Type 2 diabetes subjects (diagnosed clinically) at least 6 months prior to screening
- HbA1c (glycosylated haemoglobin) 7.0-11.0 % (both inclusive) by central laboratory analysis, with the aim of a median of 8.3%. When approximately 50% of the randomised subjects have a HbA1c above 8.3%, the remaining subjects randomised must have a HbA1c below or equal to 8.3%; or when approximately 50% of the randomised subjects have a HbA1c below or equal to 8.3%, the remaining subjects randomised must have a HbA1c above 8.3%
- Body-mass index (BMI) above or equal to 20 kg/m^2
- Subjects on stable therapy with one OAD (defined as unchanged medication and unchanged dose) for at least 60 days (metformin, a-GI, TZD, SU, SGLT2i or glinide) prior to screening according to approved Japanese labelling
Who cannot join
- Previous treatment with insulin (except for short-term treatment in connection with intercurrent illness including gestational diabetes)
- Treatment with any medication for the indication of diabetes or obesity other than stated in the inclusion criteria in a period of 60 days before screening
- Anticipated initiation or change in concomitant medications in excess of 14 days known to affect weight or glucose metabolism
- Impaired liver function, defined as alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) equal to or above 2.5 times upper limit of normal
- Renal impairment estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) below 60mL/min/1.73m^2 as per Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI)
- Screening calcitonin equal to or above 50 ng/L
Show all 9Show fewer
- History of pancreatitis (acute or chronic)
- Personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) or multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN 2)
- Subjects presently classified as being in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV
Trial locations and contacts
76 sites in 1 country.
76 sites in 1 country
Japan76 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Adachi-ku, Tokyo, 123-0845
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Akita-shi, Akita, 010-8543
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Annaka-shi, Gunma, 379-0116
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Asahikawa-shi, Hokkaido, 070-0002
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Chiba-shi, Chiba, 260-0804
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Chitose, Hokkaido, 066-0032
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 103-0002
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Chuo-ku,Tokyo, 103-0025
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Chūōku, 104 0061
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, 134-0084
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Fujisawa-shi, Kanagawa, 251-0041
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Fukuoka-shi, Fukuoka, 819-0168
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Fukushima, 963-8851
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Gunma, 373-0036
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Hachioji-shi, Tokyo, 192-0917
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Hokkaido, 060-0062
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Hokkaido, 078-8236
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Ibaraki, 311-0113
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Ichihara-shi, Chiba, 290-0003
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Iruma-shi, Saitama, 358-0011
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-0004
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 175-0093
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Izumisano, 598 0048
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Izumisano-shi,Osaka, 598-8577
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kagoshima-shi, Kagoshima, 890-0061
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kamakura-shi, 247 0056
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kanagawa, 235-0045
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kanra-gun, Gunma, 370-2214
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kashiwara-shi, Osaka, 582-0005
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kawagoe-shi, Saitama, 350-0851
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kawaguchi-shi, Saitama, 332-0012
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kawasaki-shi,Kanagawa, 215-0026
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kisarazu-shi, Chiba, 292-0038
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kobe-shi, Hyogo
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kuki-shi, Saitama, 346-8530
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kumamoto, 862-0976
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kumamoto-shi, Kumamoto, 860-0811
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kumamoto-shi, Kumamoto, 861-8039
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kushiro-shi, Hokkaido, 085-0032
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, 606-8507
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-0075
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Mito-shi, Ibaraki, 310-0826
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Mito-shi, Ibaraki, 311-4153
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Miura-shi, Kanagawa, 238-0101
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Miyazaki, 880-0034
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Nagoya-shi, Aichi, 455-8530
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Nagoya-shi, Aichi, 456-0058
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Nishinomiya-shi, Hygo, 662 0971
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Obihiro-shi, Hokkaido, 080 0016
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Obihiro-shi, Hokkaido, 080 0848
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Ōita, 870 0039
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Okawa-shi, Fukuoka, 831-0016
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Onga-gun, Fukuoka, 811-4342
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Osaka, 569-1045
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Osaka-shi, Osaka, 530-0013
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Osaka-shi, Osaka, 533-0024
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Osaka-shi, Osaka, 536-0001
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Ota-ku, Tokyo, 1430015
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Saijo-shi, Ehime, 793-0027
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Sapporo-shi, Hokkaido, 004-0004
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Sapporo-shi, Hokkaido, 060-0001
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Sendai-shi, Miyagi, 980-0011
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Sendai-shi, Miyagi, 980-0021
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi, 329-0433
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Shizuoka-shi, Shizuoka, 424-0853
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Tochigi, 323-0022
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Tokyo, 103-0027
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Tokyo, 103-0028
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Tokyo, 104-0031
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Tokyo, 169-0073
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Toshima-ku, Tokyo, 171-0021
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Toyonaka-shi, Osaka, 560-0082
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Ube-shi, Yamaguchi, 755-0046
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Urasoe-shi,, 901 2104
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Yamaguchi-shi, Yamaguchi, 754-0002
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Yamato-shi, Kanagawa, 242-0004
About this study
Official title: A Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide, Insulin Degludec and Liraglutide in Japanese Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
This trial is conducted in Asia. The aim of this trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/liraglutide, insulin degludec and liraglutide in Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
- Conditions
- Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Being tested
- insulin degludec/liraglutide, insulin degludec, liraglutide
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
insulin degludec/liraglutideDrug
Injected s.c. / subcutaneously (under the skin) once daily (OD) , in combination with pre-trial OAD (oral antidiabetic drug)kept in unchanged dose.
insulin degludecDrug
Injected s.c. / subcutaneously (under the skin) once daily (OD) , in combination with pre-trial OAD (oral antidiabetic drug)kept in unchanged dose.
liraglutideDrug
Injected s.c. / subcutaneously (under the skin) once daily (OD) , in combination with pre-trial OAD (oral antidiabetic drug)kept in unchanged dose.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Insulin degludec/liraglutide OD | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: insulin degludec/liraglutide |
| Insulin degludec OD | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: insulin degludec |
| Liraglutide OD | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: liraglutide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin) Tested for Non-inferiority of IDegLira vs IDeg and Superiority of IDegLira vs Lira
Change from baseline (week 0) in HbA1c after 52 weeks of treatment was measured. Statistical analyses were performed to test the hypotheses: non-inferiority of IDegLira vs. IDeg and superiority of IDegLira vs. Liraglutide (Lira).
Measured: Week 0, Week 52
Secondary outcomes (39)
Change From Baseline in Body Weight (kg)
Change from baseline (week 0) in body weight after 52 weeks of treatment.
Measured: Week 0, Week 52
Number of Treatment Emergent Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes
Treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episode is defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 days after the last day on trial product.
Severe or BG confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as episodes that were severe according to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value < 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with or without symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia.
Severe hypoglycaemia according to the ADA definition: an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or take other corrective actions. Plasma glucose concentrations may not be available during an event, but neurological recovery following the return of plasma glucose to normal is considered sufficient evidence that the event was induced by a low plasma glucose concentration.
Measured: Weeks 0-52
Change From Baseline in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin) Tested for Superiority of IDegLira vs IDeg
Change from baseline (week 0) in HbA1c after 52 weeks of treatment was measured. Statistical analysis was performed to test the hypothesis: superiority of IDegLira vs. IDeg.
Measured: Week 0, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
Change from baseline (week 0) in FPG after 52 weeks
Measured: Week 0, Week 52
Insulin Dose
Actual daily total insulin dose after 52 weeks of treatment.
Measured: After 52 weeks of treatment
Responder (Yes/no): HbA1c Less Than 7.0%
Number of subjects with HbA1c less than 7.0% after 52 weeks of treatment.
Measured: After 52 weeks of treatment
Responder (Yes/no): HbA1c Less Than 7.0% and Change in Body Weight From Baseline Below or Equal to Zero
Number of subjects with HbA1c less than 7.0% and without weight gain after 52 weeks of treatment.
Measured: After 52 weeks of treatment
Responder (Yes/no): HbA1c Less Than 7.0% Without Treatment Emergent Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During the Last 12 Weeks of Treatment.
Number of subjects with HbA1c less than 7.0% after 52 weeks, who did not experience treatment emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes during the last 12 weeks of treatment.
Treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episode is defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 days after the last day on trial product.
Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as episodes that were severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value < 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia.
Measured: After 52 weeks of treatment
Responder (Yes/no): HbA1c Less Than 7.0% and Change in Body Weight From Baseline Below or Equal to Zero and Without Treatment Emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During the Last 12 Weeks of Treatment
Number of subjects with HbA1c less than 7.0% and without weight gain, who did not experience treatment emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes during the last 12 weeks of treatment.
Treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episode is defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 days after the last day on trial product.
Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as episodes that were severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value < 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia.
Measured: After 52 weeks of treatment
Responder (Yes/no): HbA1c Less Than 6.5%
Number of subjects with HbA1c less than 6.5% after 52 weeks of treatment.
Measured: After 52 weeks of treatment
Responder (Yes/no): HbA1c Less Than 6.5% and Change in Body Weight From Baseline Below or Equal to Zero
Number of subjects with HbA1c less than 6.5% and without weight gain after 52 weeks of treatment.
Measured: After 52 weeks of treatment
Responder (Yes/no): HbA1c Less Than 6.5% Without Treatment Emergent Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During the Last 12 Weeks of Treatment.
Number of subjects with HbA1c less than 6.5% after 52 weeks, who did not experience treatment emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes during the last 12 weeks of treatment.
Treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episode is defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 days after the last day on trial product.
Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as episodes that were severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value < 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia.
Measured: After 52 weeks of treatment
Responder (Yes/no): HbA1c Less Than 6.5% and Change in Body Weight From Baseline Below or Equal to Zero and Without Treatment Emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During the Last 12 Weeks of Treatment
Number of subjects with HbA1c less than 6.5% with no weight gain, who did not experience treatment emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes during the last 12 weeks of treatment.
Treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episode is defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 days after the last day on trial product.
Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as episodes that were severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value < 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia.
Measured: After 52 weeks of treatment
Change in Waist Circumference
Change from baseline (week 0) in waist circumference after 52 weeks of treatment.
Measured: Week 0, Week 52
Change in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic)
Change from baseline in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) after 52 weeks of treatment.
Measured: Week 0, Week 52
Self-Measured Blood Glucose (SMBG) 9-point Profile: 9-point Profile (Individual Points in the Profile)
Subjects were instructed to measure their plasma glucose at following timepoints: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after start of dinner, at bedtime, at 4:00 a.m. and before breakfast the following day.
Measured: After 52 weeks of the treatment
Change in SMBG 9-point Profile - Mean of the 9-point Profile
Subjects were instructed to measure their plasma glucose at following timepoints: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after start of dinner, at bedtime, at 4:00 a.m. and before breakfast the following day. Mean of the 9-point profile was defined as the area under the profile (calculated using the trapezoidal method) divided by the measurement time.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in SMBG 9-point Profile - Mean of Postprandial Increments (From Before Meal to 90 Min After for Breakfast, Lunch and Dinner)
Subjects were instructed to measure their plasma glucose at following timepoints: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after start of dinner, at bedtime, at 4:00 a.m. and before breakfast the following day. The mean increment over all meals was derived as the mean of all available meal increments.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Total Cholesterol as a Ratio to Baseline at 52 Weeks
Total cholesterol after 52 weeks of treatment was represented as ratio to baseline (week 0) values.
Measured: After 52 weeks of treatment
Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol as a Ratio to Baseline at 52 Weeks
Low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol after 52 weeks of treatment was represented as ratio to baseline (week 0) values.
Measured: After 52 weeks of treatment
High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol as a Ratio to Baseline at 52 Weeks
High density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol after 52 weeks of treatment was represented as ratio to baseline (week 0) values.
Measured: After 52 weeks of treatment
Very Low Density Lipoprotein (VLDL) Cholesterol as a Ratio to Baseline at 52 Weeks
Very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol after 52 weeks of treatment was represented as ratio to baseline (week 0) values.
Measured: After 52 weeks of treatment
Triglycerides as a Ratio to Baseline at 52 Weeks
Triglycerides after 52 weeks of treatment was represented as ratio to baseline (week 0) values.
Measured: After 52 weeks of treatment
Free Fatty Acids as a Ratio to Baseline at 52 Weeks
Free fatty acids after 52 weeks of treatment was represented as ratio to baseline (week 0) values.
Measured: After 52 weeks of treatment
Fasting C-peptide as a Ratio to Baseline at 52 Weeks
Fasting C-peptide after 52 weeks of treatment was represented as ratio to baseline (week 0) values.
Measured: After 52 weeks of treatment
Fasting Human Insulin as a Ratio to Baseline at 52 Weeks
Fasting human insulin after 52 weeks of treatment was represented as ratio to baseline (week 0) values.
Measured: After 52 weeks of treatment
Fasting Glucagon as a Ratio to Baseline at 52 Weeks
Fasting glucagon after 52 weeks of treatment was represented as ratio to baseline (week 0) values.
Measured: After 52 weeks of treatment
Proinsulin as a Ratio to Baseline at 52 Weeks
Proinsulin after 52 weeks of treatment was represented as ratio to baseline (week 0) values.
Measured: After 52 weeks of treatment
Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Treatment emergent adverse event is defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 days after the last day on trial product. If the event had onset date before the first day of exposure on randomised treatment and increased in severity during the treatment period and until 7 days after the last drug date, then this event was considered as a TEAE.
Measured: 0-52 weeks
Number of Treatment Emergent Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes
Treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episode is defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 days after the last day on trial product.
Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as episodes that were severe according to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value < 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia.
Severe hypoglycaemia according to the ADA definition: an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or take other corrective actions. Plasma glucose concentrations may not be available during an event, but neurological recovery following the return of plasma glucose to normal is considered sufficient evidence that the event was induced by a low plasma glucose concentration.
Measured: 0-52 weeks
Number of Treatment Emergent Nocturnal Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes
Treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episode is defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 days after the last day on trial product. Nocturnal period: The period between 00:01 and 05:59 a.m. (both inclusive).
Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as episodes that were severe according to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value < 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia.
Severe hypoglycaemia according to the ADA definition: an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or take other corrective actions. Plasma glucose concentrations may not be available during an event, but neurological recovery following the return of plasma glucose to normal is considered sufficient evidence that the event was induced by a low plasma glucose concentration.
Measured: 0-52 weeks
Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to American Diabetes Association (ADA) Definition
Results represent total number of treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episodes that fall under ADA's definition of hypoglycaemia. ADA's definition of hypoglycaemia includes following categories:
- Severe hypoglycaemia
- Documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia
- Asymptomatic hypoglycaemia
- Probable symptomatic hypoglycaemia
- Pseudo-hypoglycaemia. Treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episode is defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 days after the last day on trial product.
Measured: 0-52 weeks
Anti-drug Antibodies: Anti-insulin Degludec Antibodies
Insulin degludec (IDeg)-specific antibodies were measured at week 52, as %B/T (percentage of bound \& precipitated radioactive drug/total added drug to the sample). A sample is measured in 2 different series. In series 1, the radioactive IDeg (tracer) and surplus unlabeled IDeg are added to the sample. In series 2, the tracer and surplus unlabeled human insulin are added to the sample. Series 1 represents unspecific background binding. Series 2 represents IDeg specific antibodies including unspecific background binding. The reported %B/T is calculated by subtracting the background %B/T in series 1 from the %B/T result in series 2. If the background result has higher values than the %B/T in series 2, the resulting value is negative %B/T. Here, a negative %B/T value means that the test samples do not have IDeg-specific antibodies. The reason for getting a negative value for %B/T is due to variation in the analytical background. Thus, the results presented are not a change from baseline.
Measured: at week 52
Anti-drug Antibodies: Number of Participants Positive or Negative for Anti-liraglutide Antibodies
Anti-liraglutide antibodies were measured at week 52. Number of participants positive or negative for anti-liraglutide antibodies at week 52 were reported.
Measured: at week 52
Change in Clinical Evaluation: Fundoscopy or Fundus Photography
The result of the fundus photography/dilated fundoscopy was interpreted by the investigator into following categories: Normal; Abnormal (Abn), Not Clinically significant (NCS); Abnormal, Clinically significant (CS). Reported results are number of subjects with 'normal'; 'Abn, NCS' and 'Abn, CS' fundoscopy/fundus photography results at screening (week -2 to week 0) and week 52.
Measured: at screening (week -2 to week 0), at week 52
Change in Clinical Evaluation: Electrocardiogram (ECG)
The result of the ECG was interpreted by the investigator into following categories: Normal; Abnormal (Abn), Not Clinically significant (NCS); Abnormal, Clinically significant (CS). Reported results are number of subjects with 'normal'; 'Abn, NCS' and 'Abn, CS' ECG results at screening (week -2 to week 0) and week 52.
Measured: at screening (week -2 to week 0), at week 52
Change in Clinical Evaluation: Pulse
Change in pulse after 52 weeks of treatment.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Serum Concentrations of Insulin Degludec
Samples from the IDegLira and IDeg arms were analysed for serum concentrations of insulin degludec using validated ELISA assays.
Measured: Weeks 2, 8, 16, 26, 44, 52
Plasma Concentrations of Liraglutide
Samples from the IDegLira and liraglutide arms were assayed for plasma concentrations of liraglutide using validated ELISA assays.
Measured: Weeks 2, 8, 16, 26, 44, 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Nov 2015 (estimated)
- Study start18 Nov 2015
- Primary completion15 Dec 2017
- Study completion22 Dec 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novo Nordisk A/SThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 819 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novo Nordisk A/S
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02607306
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NN9068-4183
- Other IDs
- U1111-1170-1332, JapicCTI-153089
- Acronym
- DUAL™ I Japan
- Status last verified
- Mar 2021
- First submitted
- 16 Nov 2015
- Last updated
- 9 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: According to the Novo Nordisk disclosure commitment on novonordisk-trials.com
Publications
Kaku K, Araki E, Tanizawa Y, Ross Agner B, Nishida T, Ranthe M, Inagaki N. Superior efficacy with a fixed-ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with insulin degludec and liraglutide in insulin-naive Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes in a phase 3, open-label, randomized trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Dec;21(12):2674-2683. doi: 10.1111/dom.13856. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
PubMed 31407845Komatsu M, Watada H, Kaneko S, Ross Agner BF, Nishida T, Kaku K. Efficacy and safety of the fixed-ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide by baseline glycated hemoglobin, body mass index and age in Japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes: A subgroup analysis of two phase III trials. J Diabetes Investig. 2021 Sep;12(9):1610-1618. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13525. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
PubMed 33595901
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide, Insulin Degludec and Liraglutide in Japanese Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02607306
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DUAL™ I Japan / NN9068-4183
- Conditions
- Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 819 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novo Nordisk A/SIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 18 Nov 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Dec 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Nov 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 29 Jul 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This trial is conducted in Asia. The aim of this trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/liraglutide, insulin degludec and liraglutide in Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Insulin degludec/liraglutide OD | Experimental | Drug: insulin degludec/liraglutide |
| Insulin degludec OD | Active comparator | Drug: insulin degludec |
| Liraglutide OD | Active comparator | Drug: liraglutide |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Male or female Japanese subjects, age at least 20 years at the time of signing informed consent
- Type 2 diabetes subjects (diagnosed clinically) at least 6 months prior to screening
- HbA1c (glycosylated haemoglobin) 7.0-11.0 % (both inclusive) by central laboratory analysis, with the aim of a median of 8.3%. When approximately 50% of the randomised subjects have a HbA1c above 8.3%, the remaining subjects randomised must have a HbA1c below or equal to 8.3%; or when approximately 50% of the randomised subjects have a HbA1c below or equal to 8.3%, the remaining subjects randomised must have a HbA1c above 8.3%
- Body-mass index (BMI) above or equal to 20 kg/m^2
- Subjects on stable therapy with one OAD (defined as unchanged medication and unchanged dose) for at least 60 days (metformin, a-GI, TZD, SU, SGLT2i or glinide) prior to screening according to approved Japanese labelling
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Previous treatment with insulin (except for short-term treatment in connection with intercurrent illness including gestational diabetes)
- Treatment with any medication for the indication of diabetes or obesity other than stated in the inclusion criteria in a period of 60 days before screening
- Anticipated initiation or change in concomitant medications in excess of 14 days known to affect weight or glucose metabolism
- Impaired liver function, defined as alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) equal to or above 2.5 times upper limit of normal
- Renal impairment estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) below 60mL/min/1.73m^2 as per Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| insulin degludec/liraglutideInjected s.c. / subcutaneously (under the skin) once daily (OD) , in combination with pre-trial OAD (oral antidiabetic drug)kept in unchanged dose. | Drug | Insulin degludec/liraglutide OD |
| insulin degludecInjected s.c. / subcutaneously (under the skin) once daily (OD) , in combination with pre-trial OAD (oral antidiabetic drug)kept in unchanged dose. | Drug | Insulin degludec OD |
| liraglutideInjected s.c. / subcutaneously (under the skin) once daily (OD) , in combination with pre-trial OAD (oral antidiabetic drug)kept in unchanged dose. | Drug | Liraglutide OD |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin) Tested for Non-inferiority of IDegLira vs IDeg and Superiority of IDegLira vs Lira
Time frame: Week 0, Week 52
Change from baseline (week 0) in HbA1c after 52 weeks of treatment was measured. Statistical analyses were performed to test the hypotheses: non-inferiority of IDegLira vs. IDeg and superiority of IDegLira vs. Liraglutide (Lira).
39 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Body Weight (kg)
Time frame: Week 0, Week 52
Number of Treatment Emergent Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes
Time frame: Weeks 0-52
Change From Baseline in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin) Tested for Superiority of IDegLira vs IDeg
Time frame: Week 0, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
Time frame: Week 0, Week 52
Insulin Dose
Time frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Responder (Yes/no): HbA1c Less Than 7.0%
Time frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Responder (Yes/no): HbA1c Less Than 7.0% and Change in Body Weight From Baseline Below or Equal to Zero
Time frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Responder (Yes/no): HbA1c Less Than 7.0% Without Treatment Emergent Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During the Last 12 Weeks of Treatment.
Time frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Responder (Yes/no): HbA1c Less Than 7.0% and Change in Body Weight From Baseline Below or Equal to Zero and Without Treatment Emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During the Last 12 Weeks of Treatment
Time frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Responder (Yes/no): HbA1c Less Than 6.5%
Time frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Responder (Yes/no): HbA1c Less Than 6.5% and Change in Body Weight From Baseline Below or Equal to Zero
Time frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Responder (Yes/no): HbA1c Less Than 6.5% Without Treatment Emergent Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During the Last 12 Weeks of Treatment.
Time frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Responder (Yes/no): HbA1c Less Than 6.5% and Change in Body Weight From Baseline Below or Equal to Zero and Without Treatment Emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During the Last 12 Weeks of Treatment
Time frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Change in Waist Circumference
Time frame: Week 0, Week 52
Change in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic)
Time frame: Week 0, Week 52
Self-Measured Blood Glucose (SMBG) 9-point Profile: 9-point Profile (Individual Points in the Profile)
Time frame: After 52 weeks of the treatment
Change in SMBG 9-point Profile - Mean of the 9-point Profile
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Change in SMBG 9-point Profile - Mean of Postprandial Increments (From Before Meal to 90 Min After for Breakfast, Lunch and Dinner)
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Total Cholesterol as a Ratio to Baseline at 52 Weeks
Time frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol as a Ratio to Baseline at 52 Weeks
Time frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol as a Ratio to Baseline at 52 Weeks
Time frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Very Low Density Lipoprotein (VLDL) Cholesterol as a Ratio to Baseline at 52 Weeks
Time frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Triglycerides as a Ratio to Baseline at 52 Weeks
Time frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Free Fatty Acids as a Ratio to Baseline at 52 Weeks
Time frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Fasting C-peptide as a Ratio to Baseline at 52 Weeks
Time frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Fasting Human Insulin as a Ratio to Baseline at 52 Weeks
Time frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Fasting Glucagon as a Ratio to Baseline at 52 Weeks
Time frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Proinsulin as a Ratio to Baseline at 52 Weeks
Time frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time frame: 0-52 weeks
Number of Treatment Emergent Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes
Time frame: 0-52 weeks
Number of Treatment Emergent Nocturnal Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes
Time frame: 0-52 weeks
Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to American Diabetes Association (ADA) Definition
Time frame: 0-52 weeks
Anti-drug Antibodies: Anti-insulin Degludec Antibodies
Time frame: at week 52
Anti-drug Antibodies: Number of Participants Positive or Negative for Anti-liraglutide Antibodies
Time frame: at week 52
Change in Clinical Evaluation: Fundoscopy or Fundus Photography
Time frame: at screening (week -2 to week 0), at week 52
Change in Clinical Evaluation: Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Time frame: at screening (week -2 to week 0), at week 52
Change in Clinical Evaluation: Pulse
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Serum Concentrations of Insulin Degludec
Time frame: Weeks 2, 8, 16, 26, 44, 52
Plasma Concentrations of Liraglutide
Time frame: Weeks 2, 8, 16, 26, 44, 52
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Apr 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 31407845Kaku K, Araki E, Tanizawa Y, Ross Agner B, Nishida T, Ranthe M, Inagaki N. Superior efficacy with a fixed-ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with insulin degludec and liraglutide in insulin-naive Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes in a phase 3, open-label, randomized trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Dec;21(12):2674-2683. doi: 10.1111/dom.13856. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
- Results publication: PubMed 33595901Komatsu M, Watada H, Kaneko S, Ross Agner BF, Nishida T, Kaku K. Efficacy and safety of the fixed-ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide by baseline glycated hemoglobin, body mass index and age in Japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes: A subgroup analysis of two phase III trials. J Diabetes Investig. 2021 Sep;12(9):1610-1618. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13525. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
- Clinical Trials at Novo NordiskLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. According to the Novo Nordisk disclosure commitment on novonordisk-trials.com
Related trials for Diabetes
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Effects of Lean Pork Loin Intake on Protein Homeostasis and Glucose Regulation in Prediabetic Adults
Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Prediabetes
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
76 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing insulin degludec/liraglutide, insulin degludec and liraglutide in people with Diabetes and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Novo Nordisk A/S at 76 sites in Japan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 76 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Jul 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin) Tested for Non-inferiority of IDegLira vs IDeg and Superiority of IDegLira vs Lira (time frame: Week 0, Week 52). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02607306, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Apr 2021.