AzTrials
AzTrials

Middle Cerebral Artery InfarctionSMARTNCT02609256

Stereotactic Infarct Tissue Aspiration for Malignant Infarction of Middle Cerebral Artery

A study testing Stereotactic infarct tissue aspiration and Medical therapy in people with Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction, run by General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region at 1 site in China.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Malignant middle cerebral artery infarction(MMCI) has a high rate of disability and mortality. At present, there is no effective treatment except for craniotomy decompression, but the controversy of the craniotomy decompression still exists. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction
What is being tested?
Stereotactic infarct tissue aspiration and Medical therapy
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
12 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
Dec 2015to Jul 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • ages from 40 to 90
  • within 48 hours of onset
  • brain imaging confirmed malignant middle cerebral artery infarction (DWI+MRA)
  • infarction volume > 145ml
  • craniotomy decompression can not be performed due to the contraindications, or refused by the patient or relatives
  • signed informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • hemorrhagic stroke
  • severe infection or severe disfunction of liver, kidney, hematopoietic system, endocrine system and other serious diseases
  • other clinical trials within 3 months
  • a negative attitude towards SITA by patient or relatives
  • other conditions not eligible for the trail judged by the researchers.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • General hospital of shenyang military region

    Shenyang, Liaoning, 110840

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Stereotactic Infarct Tissue Aspiration (SITA) for Malignant Infarction of Middle Cerebral Artery

Malignant middle cerebral artery infarction(MMCI) has a high rate of disability and mortality. At present, there is no effective treatment except for craniotomy decompression, but the controversy of the craniotomy decompression still exists. The project is a prospective, randomized, single center, open label, clinical controlled trail. The eligible patients for enrollment are as follows: (1) malignant cerebral artery infarction within 48h onset; (2) craniotomy decompression can not be performed due to the contraindications, or refused by the patient or relatives. The patients are randomly assigned into 2 groups: (1)Medical therapy group: receiving osmotic therapy with mannitol and glycerol fructose,anti-platelet treatment, statins, and other symptomatic treatments such as controlling blood pressure, blood sugar, and infection, tracheal intubation or incision, etc; (2) Stereotactic infarct tissue aspiration (SITA) group: on the basis of medical treatment, receiving minimally invasive aspiration of infarct tissue 24-48 hours after stroke attacked. This study is aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety of of SITA in patients with MMCI.

Read the detailed description

Malignant middle cerebral artery infarction (MMCI) has a fatality rate of up to 80%, due to massive brain edema, increased intracranial pressure, and cerebral herniation. The herniation-induced death usually occured during the first week, despite aggressive osmotherapy with mannitol or hypertonic saline, sedation, and eventually hyperventilation, buffers, or hypothermia. A growing evidence show that decompression craniectomy (DC) can produce a significant reduction in mortality rate and an improvement in neurological outcome, but the controversy of the DC still exists. There is an urgent need to find a more effective treatment method. Given that brain tissue necrosis-induced edema and cerebral herniation is the key reason of fatality and disability of MMCI patients, the investigators argue that the reduction of cerebral tissue volume by stereotactic infarct tissue aspiration (SITA) is likely to reach the decompression effect similar to the DC. Recently, the investigators performed SITA in 2 MMCI patients who were qualified for decompressive craniectomy, but refused by patient relatives, and their neurological function significantly improved.

The project is a prospective, randomized, single center, open label, clinical controlled trail. The eligible patients for enrollment are as follows: (1)ages from 40 to 90 years old; (2) malignant cerebral artery infarction within 48h onset; (3) craniotomy decompression can not be performed due to the contraindications, or refused by the patient or relatives. The patients are randomly assigned into 2 groups: (1) Medical therapy group: receiving osmotic therapy with mannitol and glycerol fructose,anti-platelet treatment, statins, and other symptomatic treatments such as controlling blood pressure, blood sugar, and infection, and tracheal intubation or incision, etc; (2) SITA group: receiving minimally invasive aspiration of infarct tissue 24-48 hours after stroke attacked on the basis of medical treatment. This study is aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety of of SITA in patients with MMCI.

Being tested
Stereotactic infarct tissue aspiration, Medical therapy
Keywords
Intracranial hypertension, cerebral herniation, Stereotactic infarct tissue aspiration, fatality, disability
Medical subject headings
Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery, Intracranial Hypertension

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Stereotactic infarct tissue aspirationProcedure or surgery

    The patient posed supine position to expose local skin and puncture point was located at 6.5 cm behind the hairline of the lesion side, and 5.0 cm lateral of midline. After routine skin preparation and disinfection, 5% lidocaine 2-5 ml was injected for local anesthesia. The skin was cut to expose periosteum by a scalpel. After skull was vertically drilled through with a 6mm diameter hole, a sterile tube with a needle in tube was put about 8 cm into centrum semiovale. The needle was put out and about 50ml necrosis brain tissue was aspirated by a 20 ml syringe. The tube was fixed into the skin about 2 cm after subcutaneous tunnel, and connected to the drainage bag. Surgical area was sterilized and wrapped by sterile gauze bandage.

  • Medical therapyOther

    osmotic therapy with mannitol and glycerol fructose,anti-platelet treatment, statins, and other symptomatic treatments such as controlling blood pressure, blood sugar, and infection, and tracheal intubation or incision, etc

Study groups in NCT02609256
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Stereotactic infarct tissue aspirationExperimentalPatients receive the stereotactic infarct tissue aspiration 24-48 hours after cerebral infarction beside medical therapy.
Receives: Procedure: Stereotactic infarct tissue aspiration; Other: Medical therapy
Medical therapySham comparatorosmotic therapy with mannitol and glycerol fructose,anti-platelet treatment, statins, and other symptomatic treatments such as controlling blood pressure, blood sugar, and infection, and tracheal intubation or incision, etc;
Receives: Other: Medical therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Modified Rankin Scale(mRS) 0-3 vs mRS 4-6

    Measured: 90±7days

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. National Institute of Health stroke scale(NIHSS)

    NIHSS score improvement

    Measured: 14±2days

  2. Mean survival time

    Measured: 1 year

  3. death due to any reasons

    Measured: 90±7days

  4. mRS 0-4 compared with mRS 5 or 6

    Measured: 90±7days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Nov 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2015
  3. Primary completionApr 2017
  4. Study completionJul 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
12 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02609256
Sponsor's protocol ID
k(2015)32
Acronym
SMART
Status last verified
May 2018
First submitted
11 Nov 2015
Last updated
14 May 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • van Middelaar T, Richard E, van der Worp HB, van den Munckhof P, Nieuwkerk PT, Visser MC, Stam J, Nederkoorn PJ. Quality of life after surgical decompression for a space-occupying middle cerebral artery infarct: A cohort study. BMC Neurol. 2015 Aug 28;15:156. doi: 10.1186/s12883-015-0407-0.

    PubMed 26311142
  • Hofmeijer J, Amelink GJ, Algra A, van Gijn J, Macleod MR, Kappelle LJ, van der Worp HB; HAMLET investigators. Hemicraniectomy after middle cerebral artery infarction with life-threatening Edema trial (HAMLET). Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of decompressive surgery in space-occupying hemispheric infarction. Trials. 2006 Sep 11;7:29. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-7-29.

    PubMed 16965617
  • Neugebauer H, Heuschmann PU, Juttler E. DEcompressive Surgery for the Treatment of malignant INfarction of the middle cerebral arterY - Registry (DESTINY-R): design and protocols. BMC Neurol. 2012 Oct 2;12:115. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-12-115.

    PubMed 23031451
  • Raffiq MA, Haspani MS, Kandasamy R, Abdullah JM. Decompressive craniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction: Impact on mortality and functional outcome. Surg Neurol Int. 2014 Jun 26;5:102. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.135342. eCollection 2014.

    PubMed 25101197
  • Hatefi D, Hirshman B, Leys D, Lejeune JP, Marshall L, Carter BS, Kasper E, Chen CC. Hemicraniectomy in the management of malignant middle cerebral artery infarction: Lessons from randomized, controlled trials. Surg Neurol Int. 2014 May 15;5:72. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.132589. eCollection 2014. No abstract available.

    PubMed 24991475
  • Vahedi K, Vicaut E, Mateo J, Kurtz A, Orabi M, Guichard JP, Boutron C, Couvreur G, Rouanet F, Touze E, Guillon B, Carpentier A, Yelnik A, George B, Payen D, Bousser MG; DECIMAL Investigators. Sequential-design, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of early decompressive craniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction (DECIMAL Trial). Stroke. 2007 Sep;38(9):2506-17. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.485235. Epub 2007 Aug 9.

    PubMed 17690311
  • Simard JM, Sahuquillo J, Sheth KN, Kahle KT, Walcott BP. Managing malignant cerebral infarction. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2011 Apr;13(2):217-29. doi: 10.1007/s11940-010-0110-9.

    PubMed 21190097
  • Juttler E, Unterberg A, Woitzik J, Bosel J, Amiri H, Sakowitz OW, Gondan M, Schiller P, Limprecht R, Luntz S, Schneider H, Pinzer T, Hobohm C, Meixensberger J, Hacke W; DESTINY II Investigators. Hemicraniectomy in older patients with extensive middle-cerebral-artery stroke. N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 20;370(12):1091-100. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1311367.

    PubMed 24645942

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Stereotactic infarct tissue aspiration and Medical therapy in people with Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction, run by General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early. Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Modified Rankin Scale(mRS) 0-3 vs mRS 4-6 (time frame: 90±7days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02609256, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 May 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in