AzTrials
AzTrials

Parkinson's DiseaseNCT02610634

Visual Function During Gait in Parkinson's Disease: Impact of Cognition and Response to Visual Cues

An observational study of Parkinson's Disease, run by Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Parkinson's disease (PD) is associated with problems of gait such as veering, difficulty turning, an inability to perceive doorways or obstacles, and negotiate uneven terrain. Gait problems, especially veering, may be exacerbated by visuospatial dysfunction which predispose to falls, freezing and festination of gait. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Parkinson's Disease
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Jul 2013to Feb 2015
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Parkinson's disease participants will be recruited from Movement Disorder Clinics in Newcastle upon-Tyne. Healthy control older adults will be recruited locally within the Newcastle upon Tyne region.

Who may be able to join

  • Common to all groups
  • Aged ≥50 years
  • Able to walk unaided
  • Adequate hearing (as evaluated by the whisper test; stand 2m behind participant and whisper a 2 syllable word, participant repeats word) and vision capabilities (as measured using a Snellen chart - 6/18-6/12).
  • Stable medication for the past 1 month and anticipated over a period of 6 months
  • Group Specific Criteria
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Participants with PD:
  • Diagnosis of idiopathic PD, as defined by the UK Brain Bank criteria
  • Hoehn and Yahr stage I-III
  • Stable medication for past 1 month and anticipated over next 6 months or stable Deep Brain Stimulation for at least one month and expected following 6 months
  • Score ≥21/30 on Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) which is used to classify non-demented PD (PD dementia is <21/30)
  • Free from any neurological disorders that may have caused cognitive impairment
  • No restriction was made for medication usage and participants on stable doses of medication or treatment were permitted.

Who cannot join

  • Common to all groups
  • Psychiatric co-morbidity (e.g., major depressive disorder as determined by geriatric depression scale (GDS-15); >10/15)
  • Clinical diagnosis of dementia or other severe cognitive impairment (PD = MoCA <21/30, Controls = MoCA <26/30)
  • History of stroke, traumatic brain injury or other neurological disorders (other than PD, for that group)
  • Acute lower back or lower extremity pain, peripheral neuropathy, rheumatic and orthopaedic diseases
  • Unstable medical condition including cardio-vascular instability in the past 6 months
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Unable to comply with the testing protocol or currently participating in another interfering research project
  • Interfering therapy
  • Vision specific Criteria
  • Any pupillary diameter disorder; such as significantly non-round pupils, Adies pupil (tonic or dilated pupil), Argyll-Robertson pupil (absence of light reaction), unilateral small pupil
  • Neuromotility disorders, such as Nystagmus or other ocular oscillations
  • Significant left eye disorders (i.e. squint, twitching, Ptosis [drooping eyelids])
  • Known significant visual field deficits; such as hemianopia
  • Optic nerve disease
  • Optic disc elevation
  • Optic disc swelling; such as Papilledema or Papillitis

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Clinical Ageing Research Unit

    Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5PL

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Parkinson's disease (PD) is associated with problems of gait such as veering, difficulty turning, an inability to perceive doorways or obstacles, and negotiate uneven terrain. Gait problems, especially veering, may be exacerbated by visuospatial dysfunction which predispose to falls, freezing and festination of gait. Visuospatial dysfunction is common in PD and likely involves peripheral features (e.g. contrast sensitivity) as well as central cognitive mechanisms (e.g. attention).

Central neuro-degeneration in PD, PD dementia, and dementia with Lewy Bodies may influence visual function, as impaired visual sampling has been reported in these conditions. Visual sampling is measured via saccadic (fast eye movement) activity, as saccades are the mechanisms through which people orientate and explore the environment. The use of objective devices to reliably measure saccades is important to detect disease related eye movement changes. Emerging visuomotor research has measured visual sampling in PD using devices such as electrooculography and infra-red eye tracking, revealing reduced amplitude, speed and frequency of saccades during various tasks.

Read more

Despite recent increases in visuomotor research it remains unclear how PD influences visual sampling of the environment during gait and the influence of attentional and cognitive deficits. Recent work demonstrated that people with PD sample their environment less frequently than controls, despite a slower gait. Saccadic timing was unchanged in response to environmental cues. Despite this, environmental visual cues (transverse lines on the floor) have been shown to increase the number of fixations made during gait. However the mechanisms of this response remain unclear. Cognition is likely of importance, with response potentially influenced by attentional control.

This observational study aims to examine the influence of cognition on visuomotor control during gait in PD. This aim will be achieved by observation of visual sampling under several environmental challenges (straight walk, doorways, turns, visual cue) and a dual task.

Read the detailed description

This is an observational study of visual sampling during gait under different environmental challenge (straight, doorway, turn and visual cue (transverse lines on the floor)) and dual task. These conditions represent everyday activities/environments which can be difficult for people with PD.

This is not an interventional study as participants are not assigned to any specific interventions by the researchers, or followed up to re-assess outcomes other than for reliability testing of the eye-tracking devices used. The study has been ethically approved (NRES Committee North East - Newcastle \& North Tyneside 1: 13/NE/0128) as an observational study as participants are assigned to pre-defined groups, and have behavioural measures (primarily visual sampling and secondly gait) observed in the gait laboratory under various walking conditions common to everyday environments.

Study Hypotheses

The over-arching hypothesis of this observational study is that visual sampling during gait in PD will be influenced by cognitive impairments. This study hypothesises that saccadic activity will be restricted in PD compared to controls during gait. Dual task and environmental challenge via a doorway, turn or visual cue will influence saccadic activity during gait.

Specific study hypothesises are:

  1. Cognition will selectively impact on visuomotor control during gait
  2. Visual sampling strategies during gait will be related to selected domains of cognitive impairment

Secondary questions include:

  1. Is the Dikablis mobile eye-tracker a reliable means of measuring saccadic activity in PD and healthy controls?

After undergoing screening to confirm eligibility, subjects will be assigned into one of two groups:

  1. Older adult controls (HC; up to n = 40)
  2. People with PD (n = 60) Recruitment Participants will be recruited from Movement Disorder Clinics in Newcastle upon-Tyne. Research personnel will be available at clinics as required to invite participants to consider the study. If sufficiently interested, participants will be given a Participant Information Sheet (PIS) and letter concerning the study. The invitation will be followed up by a telephone call during the week to assess willingness to participate. If willing, a mutually convenient time for assessment will be organised, and the invitation to attend will be extended to a carer or spouse. The healthy control group will be recruited via advertisement using posters, which will be placed within neurology and geriatric departments. The advertisement will also be sent via the university email system to staff and students at Newcastle University, the recipients will be advised to pass on the poster to potential interested parties (i.e. family or friends). All participants will be evaluated at the Clinical Ageing Research Unit, Newcastle University, a purpose-build research facility. Testing Protocol Session 1; (up to 150min)
  • Initial screening and baseline assessments (45-60min)
  • Visual sampling during gait (60-90min) Session 2; (up to 60min)
  • 1st Reliability testing (45-60min) (if applicable; for a subgroup of PD and HC participants) Session 3; (up to 60min)
  • 2nd Reliability testing (45-60min) (if applicable; for a subgroup of PD and HC participants) Visual sampling during gait (session 1) Participants (n=100) will be assessed in the gait laboratory at the clinical ageing and research unit (CARU), where they will walk under different conditions, for example single task, dual task, through a doorway, whilst turning and with a visual cue (transverse lines on the floor 50cm apart) in place. Visual sampling will be assessed with a Dikablis head-mounted eye tracking and electrooculography (EOG) systems. Gait will be simultaneously assessed using a 3D motion capture system (Vicon), which will be synchronised with the eye tracking systems to provide simultaneous data collection. Infra-red markers will be taped to the body and limbs of the subjects using a small amount of double-sided tape, to allow for motion tracking. The Dikablis will also be taped to the forehead of each participant using a small amount of double sided tape. Reliability testing (subgroup) (session 2 and 3) In order to examine the test re-test reliability of mobile eye-tracking in people with PD and healthy controls, a subgroup of participants (PD and HC; up to n=25) will return for a second (within approx. 1 week) and third visit. They will be asked to repeat some of the walking tasks outlined above and to sit (with chin rest), stand and walk (on a treadmill) while performing several eye movements to visual targets (horizontal and vertical visual angles such as; 5, 10, 15, 20 degrees) in time with an auditory cue (a 60bpm metronome). Participants will return for the third visit approx. 1 week after the second visit and repeat the reliability testing (as above). Sample Size This is an exploratory study and therefore few specific previous examples are available to guide the sample size required. The sample size estimate is based on results from previous work in this research area (PD; n=21) (Galna et al., 2012), other previous similar studies and preliminary pilot work with the Dikabilis mobile eye-tracker, which is a new instrument. Similar studies in this research area have used similar sample sizes (n=2-26), demonstrating that differences between PD and HC groups will been evident. Statistical Analysis Analysis Common to all Studies Statistical analysis will be undertaken using SPSS version 19 or more recent versions (SPPS, Inc. an IBM company). Data checks of all data collected will be carried out independently by two members of the Human Movement Science Team at the Clinical Ageing Research Unit to ensure that data is accurate. All statistical tests will be carried out at the 5% two-sided level of significance. Demographic characteristics and baseline data will be summarized using descriptive statistics, including means, standard deviations, median, minimum, maximum and inter-quartile ranges for continuous or ordinal data and percentages for categorical data. The descriptive statistics will be tabulated and presented graphically for clarity.The assessments recorded at pre-testing will be taken as baseline values. One-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests will be used to check for normally distributed data. Non-normally distributed continuous distributions will be transformed where appropriate to meet the requirements of parametric tests; otherwise equivalent non-parametric tests will be adopted. Further Analysis To analyse visual sampling during gait Pearson's correlations will be used to test the strength and direction of the relationships between clinical, gait and saccadic outcomes. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) will be used to analyse the effect of group (PD, HC), dual task (single task, dual task) and environmental challenge (Straight walk, Door, Turn, Visual cue) on visual sampling during gait. To analyse reliability repeated-measure t-tests, Bland and Altman plots, intra-class correlation coefficients (Model 2, 1) and Pearson correlations (or non-parametric equivalents) will be used to assess bias, agreement and consistency of saccadic outcomes measured with the Dikablis eye-tracker on two separate occasions a week apart.
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, Older adults, Vision, Cognition, Visual cues, Eye-tracking, Gait, Saccades, Dual task, Visual sampling
Medical subject headings
Parkinson Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02610634
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Parkinson's diseasePeople with Parkinson's disease (≥ 50 years old) who do not have dementia (MoCA ≥ 21).
Older AdultsAged-matched older adults (≥ 50 years old) who are cognitively intact (MoCA ≥26).

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Visual Sampling Parameter: Saccade Frequency During Gait

    Number of fast eye movements made per second observed when walking, measured via EOG and Dikablis mobile eye-tracker. Walking conditions include; single task, dual task, through a doorway, whilst turning and with a visual cue in place.

    Measured: Session 1: observation during gait assessments (lasting approx. 90mins)

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Gait Parameter: Gait Speed

    Measured in meters per second observed when walking recorded via Vicon 3D motion capture. Walking conditions include; single task, dual task, through a doorway, whilst turning and with a visual cue in place.

    Measured: Session 1: observation during gait assessments (lasting approx. 90mins)

  2. Gait Parameter: Step Length

    Measured in meters recorded via Vicon 3D motion capture. Observed during the following walking conditions; single task, dual task, through a doorway, whilst turning and with a visual cue in place.

    Measured: Session 1: observation during gait assessments (lasting approx. 90mins)

  3. Gait Parameter: Step Time

    Measured in seconds recorded via Vicon 3D motion capture. Observed during the following walking conditions; single task, dual task, through a doorway, whilst turning and with a visual cue in place.

    Measured: Session 1: observation during gait assessments (lasting approx. 90mins) and one week later in Session 2 for a sub-group (PD and controls n = upto 25) (lasting approx. 60mins)

  4. Gait Parameter: Single Support Time

    Measured in seconds recorded via Vicon 3D motion capture. Observed during the following walking conditions; single task, dual task, through a doorway, whilst turning and with a visual cue in place.

    Measured: Session 1: observation during gait assessments (lasting approx. 90mins)

  5. Gait Parameter: Double Support Time

    Measured in seconds recorded via Vicon 3D motion capture. Observed during the following walking conditions; single task, dual task, through a doorway, whilst turning and with a visual cue in place.

    Measured: Session 1: observation during gait assessments (lasting approx. 90mins)

  6. Visual Sampling Parameter: Saccade Number During Gait

    Number of fast eye movements observed when walking, measured via EOG and Dikablis mobile eye-tracker. Walking conditions include; single task, dual task, through a doorway, whilst turning and with a visual cue in place.

    Measured: Session 1: observation during gait assessments (lasting approx. 90mins) and one week later in Session 2 for a sub-group (PD and controls n = upto 25) (lasting approx. 60mins)

  7. Visual Sampling Parameter: Saccade Velocity During Gait

    Velocity (degrees per second) of fast eye movements observed when walking, measured via EOG and Dikablis mobile eye-tracker. Walking conditions include; single task, dual task, through a doorway, whilst turning and with a visual cue in place.

    Measured: Session 1: observation during gait assessments (lasting approx. 90mins)

  8. Visual Sampling Parameter: Saccade Amplitude During Gait

    Distance (degrees) of fast eye movements observed when walking, measured via EOG and Dikablis mobile eye-tracker. Walking conditions include; single task, dual task, through a doorway, whilst turning and with a visual cue in place.

    Measured: Session 1: observation during gait assessments (lasting approx. 90mins)

  9. Visual Sampling Parameter: Saccade Acceleration During Gait

    Acceleration (degrees per second squared) of fast eye movements observed when walking, measured via EOG and Dikablis mobile eye-tracker. Walking conditions include; single task, dual task, through a doorway, whilst turning and with a visual cue in place.

    Measured: Session 1: observation during gait assessments (lasting approx. 90mins)

  10. Visual Sampling Parameter: Fixation Number During Gait

    Number of pauses (fixations) between fast eye movements observed when walking, measured via EOG and Dikablis mobile eye-tracker. Walking conditions include; single task, dual task, through a doorway, whilst turning and with a visual cue in place.

    Measured: Session 1: observation during gait assessments (lasting approx. 90mins)

  11. Visual Sampling Parameter: Fixation Duration During Gait

    Duration (ms) of pauses (fixations) between fast eye movements observed when walking, measured via EOG and Dikablis mobile eye-tracker. Walking conditions include; single task, dual task, through a doorway, whilst turning and with a visual cue in place.

    Measured: Session 1: observation during gait assessments (lasting approx. 90mins)

  12. Visual Sampling Parameter: Saccade Duration During Gait

    Duration (ms) of fast eye movements observed when walking, measured via EOG and Dikablis mobile eye-tracker. Walking conditions include; single task, dual task, through a doorway, whilst turning and with a visual cue in place.

    Measured: Session 1: observation during gait assessments (lasting approx. 90mins)

  13. Visual Sampling Parameter: Number of Blinks During Gait

    Number of blinks observed when walking, measured via EOG and Dikablis mobile eye-tracker. Walking conditions include; single task, dual task, through a doorway, whilst turning and with a visual cue in place.

    Measured: Session 1: observation during gait assessments (lasting approx. 90mins) and one week later in Session 2 for a sub-group (PD and controls n = upto 25) (lasting approx. 60mins)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Nov 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2013
  3. Primary completionFeb 2015
  4. Study completionFeb 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02610634
Sponsor's protocol ID
6601
Other IDs
CLRN, REC number
Status last verified
Sep 2017
First submitted
13 Nov 2015
Last updated
23 Oct 2017
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Lord S, Galna B, Coleman S, Yarnall A, Burn D, Rochester L. Cognition and gait show a selective pattern of association dominated by phenotype in incident Parkinson's disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014 Oct 21;6:249. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00249. eCollection 2014.

    PubMed 25374538
  • Galna B, Lord S, Daud D, Archibald N, Burn D, Rochester L. Visual sampling during walking in people with Parkinson's disease and the influence of environment and dual-task. Brain Res. 2012 Sep 14;1473:35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.07.017. Epub 2012 Jul 20.

    PubMed 22824332
  • Stuart S, Alcock L, Galna B, Lord S, Rochester L. The measurement of visual sampling during real-world activity in Parkinson's disease and healthy controls: a structured literature review. J Neurosci Methods. 2014 Jan 30;222:175-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.11.018. Epub 2013 Nov 27.

    PubMed 24291711
  • Stuart S, Galna B, Lord S, Rochester L, Godfrey A. Quantifying saccades while walking: validity of a novel velocity-based algorithm for mobile eye tracking. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:5739-42. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944931.

    PubMed 25571299
  • Stuart S, Hickey A, Galna B, Lord S, Rochester L, Godfrey A. iTrack: instrumented mobile electrooculography (EOG) eye-tracking in older adults and Parkinson's disease. Physiol Meas. 2017 Jan;38(1):N16-N31. doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/38/1/N16. Epub 2016 Dec 12.

    PubMed 27941232
  • Stuart S, Lord S, Hill E, Rochester L. Gait in Parkinson's disease: A visuo-cognitive challenge. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Mar;62:76-88. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Jan 7.

    PubMed 26773722
  • Stuart S, Galna B, Lord S, Rochester L. A protocol to examine vision and gait in Parkinson's disease: impact of cognition and response to visual cues. F1000Res. 2015 Nov 30;4:1379. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.7320.2. eCollection 2015.

    PubMed 27092242

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Parkinson's Disease, run by Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Oct 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Jan 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Visual Sampling Parameter: Saccade Frequency During Gait (time frame: Session 1: observation during gait assessments (lasting approx. 90mins)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02610634, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Oct 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 1 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in