AzTrials
AzTrials

Infant, PrematureNCT02611284

Less Invasive Beractant Administration in Preterm Infants

A study testing LISA and INSURE in people with Infant, Premature, run by Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and feasibility of a new less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) technique with a specific designed cannula for surfactant administration using Beractant replacement in preterm infants <32 weeks of gestation and compare short and long term outcomes with the… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 minute to 3 days
Conditions the study is for
Infant, Premature
What is being tested?
LISA and INSURE
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Oct 2013to Mar 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 minute to 3 days
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Preterm infants of less than 32 weeks of gestation (WG)breathing spontaneously on nCPAP during the first three days of life that met exogenous surfactant administration criteria (Table l) were eligible to enroll in the study

Who cannot join

  • Infants who met intubation criteria (Table 1) at the moment of the surfactant administration were excluded in both groups.

About this study

Official title: Less Invasive Beractant Administration in Preterm Infants: a Pilot Study.

The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and feasibility of a new less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) technique with a specific designed cannula for surfactant administration using Beractant replacement in preterm infants <32 weeks of gestation and compare short and long term outcomes with the intubation, administration of surfactant and extubation method (INSURE).

This was a single-center, prospective, open-label, non-randomized, controlled study with an experimental cohort of 30 patients treated with LISA and a retrospective control group comprising the 30 most recently treated patients with INSURE. Beractant (4 ml/Kg) was administered as exogenous surfactant in both groups if patients on nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) during the first three days of life were needed of more than 30% of fraction of inspired oxygen inspired oxygen fraction (FiO2).

Being tested
LISA, INSURE
Keywords
Beractant, Feasibility Studies, Infant, Premature, Noninvasive Ventilation
Medical subject headings
Premature Birth

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • LISAProcedure or surgery

    All infants were supported with nCPAP while breathing spontaneously during instillation. A 5Frenchgamma sterilized multi-access catheter specifically designed to deliver surfactants for Neonates was placed 1-2 cm below the vocal cords by direct laryngoscopy without the use of a Magill forceps. Beractant was used as exogenous natural surfactant, (100mg/kg; 4ml/kg) and administered in two aliquots during 1-3 minutes. Positive pressure inflations were given by a mask and bag only if the infant was apneic or bradycardia develops despite the interruption of the procedure. The surfactant administration catheter was removed after surfactant instillation and nCPAP support was maintained. A second dose of surfactant was administered during the first 3 days of life if more than 40% of FiO2 was needed while on nCPAP with at least 6 cm H2O pressure.

  • INSUREProcedure or surgery

    The INSURE technique was performed using Beractant (4ml/kg) after endotracheal intubation. A multi-access catheter for Neonates/Pediatrics designed to deliver surfactants (KimVentTrach Care Technology ®, United Kingdom) was pre-connected to the endotracheal tube and used for surfactant administration without having to disconnect the ventilator. While surfactant was administered all infants were connected to pressure support ventilation modality (PSV) combined with volume guarantee (VG), Dräger ventilator). A tidal volume of 4ml/kg was initially adjusted.

    After surfactant administration, all infants were to be extubated, in accordance with our institutional extubation guidelines, if FiO2< 0.35; for a target Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) of >90%, and if a consistent respiratory effort was present. Extubation was supported with nCPAP in all patients.

Study groups in NCT02611284
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Treatment Cohort (LISA)ExperimentalAll preterm infants born at < 32 WG between October 2013 and November 2014 who met inclusion criteria were managed by the new LISA technique.
Receives: Procedure: LISA
Historical Cohort (INSURE)OtherThe control group was collected from the period immediately before the study's initiation (from Jun 2012 to September 2013). This cohort was comprised of preterm infants of less than 32 WG who met the inclusion criteria.
Receives: Procedure: INSURE

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. % patients >1 h of mechanical ventilation

    The percentage of patients that required more than 1 hour of mechanical ventilation during the first three days of age.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. need for intermittent mechanical ventilation (iMV)

    need for iMV at any time and its duration

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. second dose of surfactant

    the requirement of a second dose of surfactant

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  3. bradycardia episodes

    the number of bradycardia episodes (<100 bpm) needing pressure inflations (PPI) during instillation

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  4. attempts to catheterize

    the number of attempts to catheterize the trachea was recorded

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  5. surfactant reflux cases

    the number of surfactant reflux cases

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Nov 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2013
  3. Primary completionNov 2014
  4. Study completionMar 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02611284
Sponsor's protocol ID
2015-01
Status last verified
Aug 2021
First submitted
16 Nov 2015
Last updated
27 Aug 2021
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Ramos-Navarro C, Sanchez-Luna M, Zeballos-Sarrato S, Gonzalez-Pacheco N. Less invasive beractant administration in preterm infants: a pilot study. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2016 Mar;71(3):128-34. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2016(03)02.

    PubMed 27074172

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing LISA and INSURE in people with Infant, Premature, run by Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

% patients >1 h of mechanical ventilation (time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02611284, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Aug 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in