AzTrials
AzTrials

Non-Small Cell Lung CancerPhase 3CheckMate 078NCT02613507

Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Docetaxel in Subjects Previously Treated With Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

A Phase 3 study testing Nivolumab and Docetaxel in people with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 33 sites in 4 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether Nivolumab improves life expectancy compared to Docetaxel in Subjects with Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer who have failed prior platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
What is being tested?
Nivolumab and Docetaxel
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
504 participants
Where
33 sitesin 4 countries
Study dates
11 Dec 2015to 24 Nov 2023
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Disease progression experienced during or after one prior platinum containing doublet chemotherapy
  • Stage IIIb/IV or recurrent disease
  • Male and Female ≥ 18 years of age
  • Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1
  • Performance Status ≤ 1

Who cannot join

  • History of Carcinomatous meningitis
  • Active Central nervous system (CNS) metastases
  • History of auto immune diseases
  • Prior treatment with Docetaxel
  • Prior treatment with ipilimumab or any drug targeting T-Cell costimulation or checkpoint pathways

Trial locations and contacts

33 sites in 4 countries.

33 sites in 4 countries

China24 sites
  • Local Institution - 0051

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100021

  • Local Institution - 0007

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100032

  • Local Institution - 0032

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100071

  • Local Institution - 0026

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100853

  • Local Institution - 0031

    Beijing, 0

  • Local Institution - 0029

    Beijing, 100021

  • Local Institution - 0006

    Changchun, Jilin, 130012

  • Local Institution - 0022

    Changchun, Jilin, 130021

  • Local Institution - 0023

    Changsha, Hunan, 410008

  • Local Institution - 0012

    Changsha, Hunan, 410013

  • Local Institution - 0011

    Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041

  • Local Institution - 0020

    Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, 400042

  • Local Institution - 0015

    Fuzhou, Fujian, 350025

  • Local Institution - 0003

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060

  • Local Institution - 0002

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080

  • Local Institution - 0008

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 0

  • Local Institution - 0009

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003

  • Local Institution - 0010

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310016

  • Local Institution - 0034

    Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000

  • Local Institution - 0017

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200032

  • Local Institution - 0025

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200433

  • Local Institution - 0014

    Shanghai, 200030

  • Local Institution - 0028

    Shanghai, 200030

  • Local Institution - 0024

    Zhengzhou, Henan, 450008

Other trials in China

Russia6 sites
  • Local Institution - 0039

    Chelyabinsk, 454048

  • Local Institution - 0052

    Moscow, 105229

  • Local Institution - 0046

    Moscow, 121309

  • Local Institution - 0042

    Saint Petersburg, 194291

  • Local Institution - 0040

    Saint Petersburg, 197758

  • Local Institution - 0041

    Saint Petersburg, 198255

Other trials in Russia

Singapore2 sites
  • Local Institution - 0048

    Singapore, 119228

  • Local Institution - 0037

    Singapore, 308433

Other trials in Singapore

Hong Kong1 site
  • Local Institution - 0049

    Hong Kong, 0

Other trials in Hong Kong

About this study

Official title: An Open-label Randomized Multinational Phase 3 Trial of Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (CheckMate 078: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 078)

The purpose of this study is to determine whether Nivolumab improves life expectancy compared to Docetaxel in Subjects with Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer who have failed prior platinum-based doublet chemotherapy.

Being tested
Nivolumab, Docetaxel
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02613507
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm A: NivolumabExperimentalNivolumab Intravenous infusion specified dose on specified days
Receives: Drug: Nivolumab
Arm B: DocetaxelActive comparatorDocetaxel Intravenous infusion specified dose on specified days
Receives: Drug: Docetaxel

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Median Overall Survival

    OS was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of death. For subjects without documentation of death, OS was censored on the last date the subject was known to be alive

    Measured: From randomization to the date of death or date participant was last known to be alive (assessed from December 2015 to Oct 2017 approximately 22 months)

  2. Overall Survival Rate

    OS was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of death. For subjects without documentation of death, OS was censored on the last date the subject was known to be alive. Rates provided are Kaplan-Meier estimates.

    Measured: From first dose to the date of death or date participant was last known to be alive (assessed from December 2015 to Oct 2017 approximately 22 months)

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Objective Response Rate (ORR)

    Investigator assessed ORR was defined as the number of participants whose best objective response (BOR) was a confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR), as determined by the investigator, divided by the number of randomized participants.

    CR= Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

    Measured: From date of first dose up to partial or complete response (up to approximately 90 months)

  2. Overall Survival (OS) in Subpopulations

    OS was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of death. For participants without documentation of death, OS was censored on the last date the participant was known to be alive. Test stratified by histology (SQ vs NSQ), PD-L1 status at 1% expression level (positive vs negative/unevaluable).

    Measured: From randomization to the date of death or date participant was last known to be alive (up to approximately 90 months)

  3. Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first documented tumor progression as determined by investigators per RECIST 1.1, or death due to any cause. Clinical deterioration in the absence of unequivocal evidence of progression was not considered progression for purposes of determining PFS. Participants who died without a reported prior progression were considered to have progressed on the date of their death. Participants who did not have disease progression or die were censored on the date of their last evaluable tumor assessment. Participants who did not have any on study tumor assessments and did not die were censored at the randomization date. Participants who started any subsequent anti-cancer therapy (including on-treatment palliative RT of non-target bone lesions, skin lesions or CNS lesions) without a prior reported progression were censored at the last evaluable tumor assessment prior to or on initiation of the subsequent anti-cancer therapy.

    Measured: From the time of randomization to the date of the first documented tumor progression or death due to any cause (up to approximately 90 months)

  4. Progression Free Survival Rate

    Clinical deterioration in the absence of unequivocal evidence of progression (per RECIST 1.1) is not considered progression for purposes of determining PFS. Participants who die without a reported prior progression will be considered to have progressed on the date of their death. Participants who did not have disease progression or die will be censored on the date of their last evaluable tumor assessment. Participants who did not have any on study tumor assessments and did not die will be censored at the randomization date. Participants who started any subsequent anti-cancer therapy without a prior reported progression will be censored at the last evaluable tumor assessment prior to or on initiation of the subsequent anti-cancer therapy. Six month progression-free survival rate as estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method

    Measured: From the time of randomization up to 6 months

  5. Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)

    TTF was defined as the minimum of the time from randomization to disease progression (per RECIST 1.1 or clinical), death or last dose date if a participant discontinued from treatment for any reasons other than "maximum clinical benefit" and "administrative reasons by sponsor". TTF was considered as event at the randomization date for participants who were randomized but not treated. TTF was censored at the last dose date for participants who discontinued treatment due to "maximum clinical benefit" or "administrative reasons by sponsor". TTF was censored at the last dose date for participants who continued on treatment without progression or death.

    This outcome measure was prespecified in the protocol to only be evaluated through the first Interim Analysis, which occurred in June 2017.

    Measured: From randomization up to disease progression, death, or last dose (up to approximately 17 months)

  6. Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Related Adverse Events (AEs)

    A treatment-related Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition in a clinical investigation participant administered study treatment and is determined to be associated with the study treatment. Adverse events are graded on a scale from 1 to 5, with Grade 1 being mild and asymptomatic; Grade 2 is moderate requiring minimal, local or noninvasive intervention; Grade 3 is severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4 events are usually severe enough to require hospitalization; Grade 5 events are fatal.

    Measured: From first dose up to 100 days after last dose (up to 93 months)

  7. Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    A treatment-related Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening (defined as an event in which the participant was at risk of death at the time of the event; it does not refer to an event which hypothetically might have caused death if it were more severe), requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization and is determined to be associated with the study treatment.

    Measured: From first dose up to 100 days after last dose (up to 93 months)

  8. Disease Related Symptom Deterioration Rate by Week 12 and Week 24

    Disease-Related Symptom Deterioration Rate is the percentage of participants with >=10 points increase from baseline in Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) score at any time between randomization and the timepoints. The Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) measures 6 items (loss of appetite, fatigue, coughing, shortness of breath, hemoptysis, pain) and 3 symptom burden items (disease-related functional limitations, quality of life) with responses captured using a 100mm visual analog scale (VAS). Scores range from 0 (highest quality of life) to 100 (worst quality of life) and is derived by dividing the length of the line drawn from the lowest possible response to the patient's response by the length of the VAS and multiplying the result by 100. An ASBI score can be derived as the mean of scores for the 6 symptom-related items with a clinically meaningful change in ASBI score being 10 points and a meaningful deterioration in symptoms is a mean post-baseline score change >= 10 points.

    Measured: At Week 12 and Week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Nov 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start11 Dec 2015
  3. Primary completion15 Sep 2017
  4. Study completion24 Nov 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
504 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02613507
Sponsor's protocol ID
CA209-078
Other IDs
2015-001893-16, 2015
Acronym
CheckMate 078
Status last verified
Nov 2024
First submitted
22 Nov 2015
Last updated
19 Nov 2024
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Hu S, Tang Z, Harrison JP, Hertel N, Penrod JR, May JR, Juarez-Garcia A, Holdgate O. Economic Evaluation of Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel for the Treatment of Advanced Squamous and Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer After Prior Chemotherapy in China. Pharmacoecon Open. 2023 Mar;7(2):273-284. doi: 10.1007/s41669-022-00383-x. Epub 2023 Mar 10.

    PubMed 36897427
  • Wu YL, Lu S, Cheng Y, Zhou C, Wang J, Mok T, Zhang L, Tu HY, Wu L, Feng J, Zhang Y, Luft AV, Zhou J, Ma Z, Lu Y, Hu C, Shi Y, Baudelet C, Cai J, Chang J. Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel in a Predominantly Chinese Patient Population With Previously Treated Advanced NSCLC: CheckMate 078 Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial. J Thorac Oncol. 2019 May;14(5):867-875. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Jan 17.

    PubMed 30659987

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Nivolumab and Docetaxel in people with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 33 sites in 4 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 33 sites in China, Russia, Singapore, Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Feb 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Median Overall Survival (time frame: From randomization to the date of death or date participant was last known to be alive (assessed from December 2015 to Oct 2017 approximately 22 months)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02613507, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Nov 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in