Non-Small Cell Lung CancerPhase 3CheckMate 078NCT02613507
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Docetaxel in Subjects Previously Treated With Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing Nivolumab and Docetaxel in people with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 33 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether Nivolumab improves life expectancy compared to Docetaxel in Subjects with Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer who have failed prior platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Nivolumab and Docetaxel
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 504 participants
- Where
- 33 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- 11 Dec 2015to 24 Nov 2023
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Disease progression experienced during or after one prior platinum containing doublet chemotherapy
- Stage IIIb/IV or recurrent disease
- Male and Female ≥ 18 years of age
- Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1
- Performance Status ≤ 1
Who cannot join
- History of Carcinomatous meningitis
- Active Central nervous system (CNS) metastases
- History of auto immune diseases
- Prior treatment with Docetaxel
- Prior treatment with ipilimumab or any drug targeting T-Cell costimulation or checkpoint pathways
Trial locations and contacts
33 sites in 4 countries.
33 sites in 4 countries
China24 sites
Local Institution - 0051
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100021
Local Institution - 0007
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100032
Local Institution - 0032
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100071
Local Institution - 0026
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100853
Local Institution - 0031
Beijing, 0
Local Institution - 0029
Beijing, 100021
Local Institution - 0006
Changchun, Jilin, 130012
Local Institution - 0022
Changchun, Jilin, 130021
Local Institution - 0023
Changsha, Hunan, 410008
Local Institution - 0012
Changsha, Hunan, 410013
Local Institution - 0011
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041
Local Institution - 0020
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, 400042
Local Institution - 0015
Fuzhou, Fujian, 350025
Local Institution - 0003
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060
Local Institution - 0002
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080
Local Institution - 0008
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 0
Local Institution - 0009
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003
Local Institution - 0010
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310016
Local Institution - 0034
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000
Local Institution - 0017
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200032
Local Institution - 0025
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200433
Local Institution - 0014
Shanghai, 200030
Local Institution - 0028
Shanghai, 200030
Local Institution - 0024
Zhengzhou, Henan, 450008
Russia6 sites
Local Institution - 0039
Chelyabinsk, 454048
Local Institution - 0052
Moscow, 105229
Local Institution - 0046
Moscow, 121309
Local Institution - 0042
Saint Petersburg, 194291
Local Institution - 0040
Saint Petersburg, 197758
Local Institution - 0041
Saint Petersburg, 198255
Singapore2 sites
Local Institution - 0048
Singapore, 119228
Local Institution - 0037
Singapore, 308433
About this study
Official title: An Open-label Randomized Multinational Phase 3 Trial of Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (CheckMate 078: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 078)
The purpose of this study is to determine whether Nivolumab improves life expectancy compared to Docetaxel in Subjects with Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer who have failed prior platinum-based doublet chemotherapy.
- Conditions
- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: Nivolumab | Experimental | Nivolumab Intravenous infusion specified dose on specified days Receives: Drug: Nivolumab |
| Arm B: Docetaxel | Active comparator | Docetaxel Intravenous infusion specified dose on specified days Receives: Drug: Docetaxel |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Median Overall Survival
OS was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of death. For subjects without documentation of death, OS was censored on the last date the subject was known to be alive
Measured: From randomization to the date of death or date participant was last known to be alive (assessed from December 2015 to Oct 2017 approximately 22 months)
Overall Survival Rate
OS was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of death. For subjects without documentation of death, OS was censored on the last date the subject was known to be alive. Rates provided are Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Measured: From first dose to the date of death or date participant was last known to be alive (assessed from December 2015 to Oct 2017 approximately 22 months)
Secondary outcomes (8)
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Investigator assessed ORR was defined as the number of participants whose best objective response (BOR) was a confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR), as determined by the investigator, divided by the number of randomized participants.
CR= Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Measured: From date of first dose up to partial or complete response (up to approximately 90 months)
Overall Survival (OS) in Subpopulations
OS was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of death. For participants without documentation of death, OS was censored on the last date the participant was known to be alive. Test stratified by histology (SQ vs NSQ), PD-L1 status at 1% expression level (positive vs negative/unevaluable).
Measured: From randomization to the date of death or date participant was last known to be alive (up to approximately 90 months)
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first documented tumor progression as determined by investigators per RECIST 1.1, or death due to any cause. Clinical deterioration in the absence of unequivocal evidence of progression was not considered progression for purposes of determining PFS. Participants who died without a reported prior progression were considered to have progressed on the date of their death. Participants who did not have disease progression or die were censored on the date of their last evaluable tumor assessment. Participants who did not have any on study tumor assessments and did not die were censored at the randomization date. Participants who started any subsequent anti-cancer therapy (including on-treatment palliative RT of non-target bone lesions, skin lesions or CNS lesions) without a prior reported progression were censored at the last evaluable tumor assessment prior to or on initiation of the subsequent anti-cancer therapy.
Measured: From the time of randomization to the date of the first documented tumor progression or death due to any cause (up to approximately 90 months)
Progression Free Survival Rate
Clinical deterioration in the absence of unequivocal evidence of progression (per RECIST 1.1) is not considered progression for purposes of determining PFS. Participants who die without a reported prior progression will be considered to have progressed on the date of their death. Participants who did not have disease progression or die will be censored on the date of their last evaluable tumor assessment. Participants who did not have any on study tumor assessments and did not die will be censored at the randomization date. Participants who started any subsequent anti-cancer therapy without a prior reported progression will be censored at the last evaluable tumor assessment prior to or on initiation of the subsequent anti-cancer therapy. Six month progression-free survival rate as estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method
Measured: From the time of randomization up to 6 months
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)
TTF was defined as the minimum of the time from randomization to disease progression (per RECIST 1.1 or clinical), death or last dose date if a participant discontinued from treatment for any reasons other than "maximum clinical benefit" and "administrative reasons by sponsor". TTF was considered as event at the randomization date for participants who were randomized but not treated. TTF was censored at the last dose date for participants who discontinued treatment due to "maximum clinical benefit" or "administrative reasons by sponsor". TTF was censored at the last dose date for participants who continued on treatment without progression or death.
This outcome measure was prespecified in the protocol to only be evaluated through the first Interim Analysis, which occurred in June 2017.
Measured: From randomization up to disease progression, death, or last dose (up to approximately 17 months)
Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Related Adverse Events (AEs)
A treatment-related Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition in a clinical investigation participant administered study treatment and is determined to be associated with the study treatment. Adverse events are graded on a scale from 1 to 5, with Grade 1 being mild and asymptomatic; Grade 2 is moderate requiring minimal, local or noninvasive intervention; Grade 3 is severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4 events are usually severe enough to require hospitalization; Grade 5 events are fatal.
Measured: From first dose up to 100 days after last dose (up to 93 months)
Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
A treatment-related Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening (defined as an event in which the participant was at risk of death at the time of the event; it does not refer to an event which hypothetically might have caused death if it were more severe), requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization and is determined to be associated with the study treatment.
Measured: From first dose up to 100 days after last dose (up to 93 months)
Disease Related Symptom Deterioration Rate by Week 12 and Week 24
Disease-Related Symptom Deterioration Rate is the percentage of participants with >=10 points increase from baseline in Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) score at any time between randomization and the timepoints. The Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) measures 6 items (loss of appetite, fatigue, coughing, shortness of breath, hemoptysis, pain) and 3 symptom burden items (disease-related functional limitations, quality of life) with responses captured using a 100mm visual analog scale (VAS). Scores range from 0 (highest quality of life) to 100 (worst quality of life) and is derived by dividing the length of the line drawn from the lowest possible response to the patient's response by the length of the VAS and multiplying the result by 100. An ASBI score can be derived as the mean of scores for the 6 symptom-related items with a clinically meaningful change in ASBI score being 10 points and a meaningful deterioration in symptoms is a mean post-baseline score change >= 10 points.
Measured: At Week 12 and Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Nov 2015 (estimated)
- Study start11 Dec 2015
- Primary completion15 Sep 2017
- Study completion24 Nov 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Non-Small Cell Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Bristol-Myers SquibbThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 504 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Study director, Bristol-Myers Squibb
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02613507
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CA209-078
- Other IDs
- 2015-001893-16, 2015
- Acronym
- CheckMate 078
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 22 Nov 2015
- Last updated
- 19 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Hu S, Tang Z, Harrison JP, Hertel N, Penrod JR, May JR, Juarez-Garcia A, Holdgate O. Economic Evaluation of Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel for the Treatment of Advanced Squamous and Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer After Prior Chemotherapy in China. Pharmacoecon Open. 2023 Mar;7(2):273-284. doi: 10.1007/s41669-022-00383-x. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
PubMed 36897427Wu YL, Lu S, Cheng Y, Zhou C, Wang J, Mok T, Zhang L, Tu HY, Wu L, Feng J, Zhang Y, Luft AV, Zhou J, Ma Z, Lu Y, Hu C, Shi Y, Baudelet C, Cai J, Chang J. Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel in a Predominantly Chinese Patient Population With Previously Treated Advanced NSCLC: CheckMate 078 Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial. J Thorac Oncol. 2019 May;14(5):867-875. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
PubMed 30659987
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Nov 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open-label Randomized Multinational Phase 3 Trial of Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (CheckMate 078: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 078)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02613507
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CheckMate 078 / CA209-078
- Conditions
- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 504 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers SquibbIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 11 Dec 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Nov 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Nov 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 22 Feb 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether Nivolumab improves life expectancy compared to Docetaxel in Subjects with Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer who have failed prior platinum-based doublet chemotherapy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: Nivolumab | Experimental | Drug: NivolumabNivolumab Intravenous infusion specified dose on specified days |
| Arm B: Docetaxel | Active comparator | Drug: DocetaxelDocetaxel Intravenous infusion specified dose on specified days |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Disease progression experienced during or after one prior platinum containing doublet chemotherapy
- Stage IIIb/IV or recurrent disease
- Male and Female ≥ 18 years of age
- Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1
- Performance Status ≤ 1
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- History of Carcinomatous meningitis
- Active Central nervous system (CNS) metastases
- History of auto immune diseases
- Prior treatment with Docetaxel
- Prior treatment with ipilimumab or any drug targeting T-Cell costimulation or checkpoint pathways
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Nivolumab | Drug | Arm A: Nivolumab |
| Docetaxel | Drug | Arm B: Docetaxel |
Primary outcome
Median Overall Survival
Time frame: From randomization to the date of death or date participant was last known to be alive (assessed from December 2015 to Oct 2017 approximately 22 months)
OS was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of death. For subjects without documentation of death, OS was censored on the last date the subject was known to be alive
Overall Survival Rate
Time frame: From first dose to the date of death or date participant was last known to be alive (assessed from December 2015 to Oct 2017 approximately 22 months)
OS was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of death. For subjects without documentation of death, OS was censored on the last date the subject was known to be alive. Rates provided are Kaplan-Meier estimates.
8 secondary outcomes
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time frame: From date of first dose up to partial or complete response (up to approximately 90 months)
Overall Survival (OS) in Subpopulations
Time frame: From randomization to the date of death or date participant was last known to be alive (up to approximately 90 months)
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: From the time of randomization to the date of the first documented tumor progression or death due to any cause (up to approximately 90 months)
Progression Free Survival Rate
Time frame: From the time of randomization up to 6 months
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)
Time frame: From randomization up to disease progression, death, or last dose (up to approximately 17 months)
Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Related Adverse Events (AEs)
Time frame: From first dose up to 100 days after last dose (up to 93 months)
Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: From first dose up to 100 days after last dose (up to 93 months)
Disease Related Symptom Deterioration Rate by Week 12 and Week 24
Time frame: At Week 12 and Week 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Nov 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36897427Hu S, Tang Z, Harrison JP, Hertel N, Penrod JR, May JR, Juarez-Garcia A, Holdgate O. Economic Evaluation of Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel for the Treatment of Advanced Squamous and Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer After Prior Chemotherapy in China. Pharmacoecon Open. 2023 Mar;7(2):273-284. doi: 10.1007/s41669-022-00383-x. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30659987Wu YL, Lu S, Cheng Y, Zhou C, Wang J, Mok T, Zhang L, Tu HY, Wu L, Feng J, Zhang Y, Luft AV, Zhou J, Ma Z, Lu Y, Hu C, Shi Y, Baudelet C, Cai J, Chang J. Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel in a Predominantly Chinese Patient Population With Previously Treated Advanced NSCLC: CheckMate 078 Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial. J Thorac Oncol. 2019 May;14(5):867-875. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
- BMS Clinical Trial InformationLink provided by the sponsor.
- BMS Clinical Trial Patient RecruitingLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bristol Myers Squibb study director
Bristol-Myers Squibb
33 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Nivolumab and Docetaxel in people with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 33 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 33 sites in China, Russia, Singapore, Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Feb 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Median Overall Survival (time frame: From randomization to the date of death or date participant was last known to be alive (assessed from December 2015 to Oct 2017 approximately 22 months)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02613507, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Nov 2024.