Gastrointestinal BleedingNCT02618980
Early Endoscopy for Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients
A study testing endoscopic hemostasis in people with Gastrointestinal Bleeding, run by Far Eastern Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
The primary aim of this study is to compare efficacy of "early endoscopy" and "non-endoscopic treatment" for management of acute upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Gastrointestinal Bleeding
- What is being tested?
- endoscopic hemostasis
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 43 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- Jul 2014to Jul 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with recent (< 2 weeks) ACS and acute upper GI bleeding accompanied with a decrease in hemoglobin (Hb) level greater than 2 g/dl
- Exclusion Criteria (if any one of the following criteria is present):
- Malignancy or other advanced disease with a life expectancy of < 6 months
- Pregnant or lactating women
- History of allergy or severe side effects to PPIs, contrast, and iodine
- Bleeding tendency, and platelet count < 80k/uL, prothrombin time INR >2.0
Show all 10Show fewer
- Decompensated liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh classification B~C) and esophagogastric varices history
- Stage 3~5 CKD (estimated Ccr < 60 ml/min/1.73m2) using Cockcroft-Gault formula, exclusive of end-stage renal disease under renal replacement therapy
- Stigmata of hemorrhage confirmed as lower GI tract bleeders
- Without informed consents
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Management of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients by Early Endoscopy and Non-Endoscopy Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety
The primary aim of this study is to compare efficacy of "early endoscopy" and "non-endoscopic treatment" for management of acute upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study will also compare rates of surgery, repeated intervention (endoscopy or TAE), rebleeding and complications between two groups.
Read the detailed description
MATERIALS AND METHODS Study Design and Randomization A multicenter RCT of recent ACS patients presenting with acute UGIB was conducted in three tertiary centers (Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Hsin-Chu Branch and Taipei Branch of National Taiwan University Hospital) in Taiwan. Patients with recent ACS, including unstable angina (UA), ST-elevation MI (STEMI) and non-ST elevation MI (NSTEMI) who presented symptoms of acute UGIB were evaluated for enrollment. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) age over 20-year-old, 2) ACS episodes in the past 2 weeks, 3) symptoms of UGIB including hematemesis, coffee ground emesis or tarry stool passage accompanied with a decrease in hemoglobin (Hb) level greater than 2 g/dl from baseline. Patients with any one of the following criteria were excluded: 1) malignancy or other advanced disease with a life expectancy of < 6 months, 2) pregnant or lactating women, 3) history of allergy or severe side effects from PPIs, contrast, and iodine, 4) platelet count < 80k/uL, or prothrombin time INR >2.0, 5) decompensated (Child-Turcotte-Pugh score B and C) liver cirrhosis, 6) stage 3~5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) (estimated Ccr < 60 ml/min/1.73m2) using Cockcroft-Gault formula, exclusive of end-stage renal disease under renal replacement therapy.17 All the authors had access to the study data and had reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
Eligible patients were randomly assigned to EE or non-EE management. Patients in both groups received bolus intravenous pantoprazole 40mg followed by continuous infusion (8mg/hour).3,18 In the EE group, patients underwent endoscopy within 24 hours after onset of UGIB symptoms. All enrolled patients were monitored in cardiac intensive care unit. At endoscopy, stigmata of hemorrhage (SRH) were treated by endoscopic therapy in combination of any two of the followings: epinephrine submucosal injection, thermocoagulation, hemoclipping, and argon plasma coagulation. Hemostasis was considered initial successful if bleeding had stopped at endoscopy. Antral-biopsy specimens were obtained to a rapid urease test and histopathological examination for Helicobacter pylori (Hp) study. Patients assigned to non-EE group received medical treatment with PPIs alone and underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy two weeks after enrollment to evaluate the recent SRH. Decision on discontinuation of DAPT was at the discretion of cardiologists depending on cardiac conditions of each enrolled patient.
Study Endpoints The primary endpoint was failure of control hemorrhage. The secondary endpoints included complication rate, length of hospital stay, units of blood transfusion, re-bleeding rate, needs for repeated intervention (endoscopic therapy, transarterial embolization (TAE), or surgery) for uncontrollable recurrent bleeding. Blood troponin-T, creatine kinase-MB, Hb, hematocrit (Hct) and complete electrocardiogram (ECG) were checked every 8 hours within 24 hours after enrollment. APACHE II, Rockall and Blatchford scores at intervention were calculated.19 This study was approved by the Research Ethics Review Committee of study institutes (FEMH IRB-103062-F, Hsin-Chu NTUH 105-001-F, Yun-Lin NTUH 201411020RIND).
Definition of failure to control hemorrhage The time frame for acute bleeding episode was defined as 24 hours after enrollment. Clinical failure of control bleeding was defined as: hematemesis or nasogastric tube drainage of significant fresh blood (≥ 200 mL) ≥ 2hours, or persistent hypovolemic shock after intervention; or 3 g/dl drop in Hb level (or 9% drop of Hct) within 24 hours if no blood transfusion; or a decrease in Hb ≥ 2 g/dL or an increase ≤ 1 g/dL, despite 2 or more units of red blood cells (RBC) component transfusion within 24 hours.
Definition of re-bleeding:
Clinically significant recurrent bleeding was defined by the followings: vomiting of fresh blood, fresh blood in the nasogastric tube aspirate, hematochezia or melena after a normal color stool, and a decrease in Hb ≥ 2 g/dL or an increase less than 1 g/dL, despite 2 or more units of RBC component transfusion.
Definition of major and minor complications Major complications were defined as death and life-threatening arrhythmias within 24 hours after randomization. Minor complications were defined as hypotension (<90/60mmHg), hypertension (>180/100mmHg), tachycardia (>120bpm), bradycardia (<60bpm), tachypnea (>24/min.), oxygen desaturation (SpO2 <90%), and minor arrhythmias.
Sample Size Estimation and Randomization The null hypothesis of this study was the superiority of EE over non-EE in the efficacy on bleeding control. The primary efficacy analysis used an intention-to-treat approach that included all patients meeting the entry criteria who had completed the follow-up. Approximately 80% of UGIB patients will stop bleeding spontaneously,20 and rates of hemostasis that resulted from a first endoscopic procedure exceeded 94% in most large studies.21 However, there was no data demonstrating the outcome of patients under DAPT developing acute UGIB treated medically alone. Therefore, we assumed that about 70% of acute UGIB patients under DAPT would stop bleeding spontaneously without therapeutic endoscopy. As a result, we estimated a sample size of at least totally 78 patients in EE and non-EE groups in order to achieve a statistical power of 80% at a 5% significance level on a two-tailed test, with margin of error of 2% in order to detect a 24% (94% vs. 70%) difference. Sealed envelopes with computer generated randomization number (0 for non-EE, 1 for EE group) were used. After enrollment, gastroenterologists opened the consecutive envelops for randomization.
Statistical Analysis Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and the comparisons between two groups were performed using the Student t-test; categorical variables were summarized as count (%) and the comparisons between groups were made using the Chi-square or the Fisher's exact test when appropriate. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were performed for evaluation of the risk factors for outcomes in both groups. A two-tailed p value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. The statistical analysis was performed using STATA software (version 11.0; Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA).
- Conditions
- Gastrointestinal Bleeding
- Being tested
- endoscopic hemostasis
- Keywords
- acute coronary syndrome, gastrointestinal bleeding, endoscopy
- Medical subject headings
- Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, Acute Coronary Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
endoscopic hemostasisOther
At endoscopy, stigmata of hemorrhage (SRH) will be treated by dual endoscopic local therapy (combining at least two of the following treatments: epinephrine injection, coaptive thermocoagulation, hemoclip therapy, argon plasma coagulation, bipolar coagulation).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| early endoscopy | Experimental | endoscopic hemostasis Receives: Other: endoscopic hemostasis |
| without early endoscopy | No intervention | Patients assigned to non-endoscopic treatment group receive high dose infusional PPI therapy. If UGI bleeding subsided after medical treatment alone, diagnostic EGD will be done under stable hemodynamic and 2 weeks after ACS to confirm UGI SRH. If the SRH is not located at UGI tract, the patients will be excluded. Troponin I or T and complete ECG will be checked every 8 hours within 24 hours of interventions. APACHE II score at intervention will be calculated for each patient. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Failure of control hemorrhage
Hematemesis or nasogastric tube drainage of significant fresh blood (≧200 mL) ≧2hours after a specific treatment (therapeutic endoscopy, medical control, transarterial embolization (TAE) or surgery); or Persistent hypovolemic shock; or 3 g/dl drop in Hb level (or 9% drop of Hct) within 24 hours if no transfusion is administered; or A decrease in Hb greater than 2 g/dL or an increase in Hb less than 1 g/dL, despite 2 or more units of blood transfused within 24 hours.
Measured: 24 hours
Secondary outcomes (5)
Complication rates
Major complications are defined as death and life-threatening arrhythmias. Minor complications are defined as hypotension (<90/60mmHg), hypertension (>180/100mmHg), tachycardia (>120bpm), bradycardia (<60bpm), tachypnea (>24/min.), oxygen desaturation (SpO2 <90%), and minor arrhythmias.
Measured: 24 hours
length of hospital stay
length of hospital stay
Measured: 14 days
units of blood transfusion
units of blood transfusion.
Measured: 24 hours
re-bleeding rate
Clinically significant recurrent bleeding was defined by:
Vomiting of fresh blood, fresh blood in the nasogastric tube aspirate, or hematochezia/melena after normal stool; a decrease in Hb (Hct) greater than 2 g/dL (10%) during any 24-h period, or an increase in Hb (Hct) less than 1 g/dl (3%) for at least 4 units of blood transfused during in 48 hours.
Measured: 72 hours
needs for repeated intervention
endoscopic therapy, angiographic embolization, and surgery.
Measured: 72 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2014
- Primary completionJul 2021
- Study completionJul 2021
Why it stopped: Slow enrollment speed due to the incidence of UGI bleeding in ACS patient is lower than expected.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Gastrointestinal BleedingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 43 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Far Eastern Memorial Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Chen-Shuan Chung, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02618980
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FEMH-IRB-103062-F
- Status last verified
- Dec 2021
- First submitted
- 21 Nov 2015
- Last updated
- 20 Dec 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Chung CS, Chen CC, Chen KC, Fang YJ, Hsu WF, Chen YN, Tseng WC, Lin CK, Lee TH, Wang HP, Wu YW. Randomized controlled trial of early endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in acute coronary syndrome patients. Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 6;12(1):5798. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09911-5.
PubMed 35388113
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Dec 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Management of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients by Early Endoscopy and Non-Endoscopy Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02618980
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FEMH-IRB-103062-F
- Conditions
- Gastrointestinal Bleeding
- Keywords
- acute coronary syndrome, gastrointestinal bleeding, endoscopy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Slow enrollment speed due to the incidence of UGI bleeding in ACS patient is lower than expected.
- Enrolment
- 43 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Far Eastern Memorial HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary aim of this study is to compare efficacy of "early endoscopy" and "non-endoscopic treatment" for management of acute upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study will also compare rates of surgery, repeated intervention (endoscopy or TAE), rebleeding and complications between two groups.
Detailed description
MATERIALS AND METHODS Study Design and Randomization A multicenter RCT of recent ACS patients presenting with acute UGIB was conducted in three tertiary centers (Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Hsin-Chu Branch and Taipei Branch of National Taiwan University Hospital) in Taiwan. Patients with recent ACS, including unstable angina (UA), ST-elevation MI (STEMI) and non-ST elevation MI (NSTEMI) who presented symptoms of acute UGIB were evaluated for enrollment. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) age over 20-year-old, 2) ACS episodes in the past 2 weeks, 3) symptoms of UGIB including hematemesis, coffee ground emesis or tarry stool passage accompanied with a decrease in hemoglobin (Hb) level greater than 2 g/dl from baseline. Patients with any one of the following criteria were excluded: 1) malignancy or other advanced disease with a life expectancy of < 6 months, 2) pregnant or lactating women, 3) history of allergy or severe side effects from PPIs, contrast, and iodine, 4) platelet count < 80k/uL, or prothrombin time INR >2.0, 5) decompensated (Child-Turcotte-Pugh score B and C) liver cirrhosis, 6) stage 3~5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) (estimated Ccr < 60 ml/min/1.73m2) using Cockcroft-Gault formula, exclusive of end-stage renal disease under renal replacement therapy.17 All the authors had access to the study data and had reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
Eligible patients were randomly assigned to EE or non-EE management. Patients in both groups received bolus intravenous pantoprazole 40mg followed by continuous infusion (8mg/hour).3,18 In the EE group, patients underwent endoscopy within 24 hours after onset of UGIB symptoms. All enrolled patients were monitored in cardiac intensive care unit. At endoscopy, stigmata of hemorrhage (SRH) were treated by endoscopic therapy in combination of any two of the followings: epinephrine submucosal injection, thermocoagulation, hemoclipping, and argon plasma coagulation. Hemostasis was considered initial successful if bleeding had stopped at endoscopy. Antral-biopsy specimens were obtained to a rapid urease test and histopathological examination for Helicobacter pylori (Hp) study. Patients assigned to non-EE group received medical treatment with PPIs alone and underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy two weeks after enrollment to evaluate the recent SRH. Decision on discontinuation of DAPT was at the discretion of cardiologists depending on cardiac conditions of each enrolled patient.
Study Endpoints The primary endpoint was failure of control hemorrhage. The secondary endpoints included complication rate, length of hospital stay, units of blood transfusion, re-bleeding rate, needs for repeated intervention (endoscopic therapy, transarterial embolization (TAE), or surgery) for uncontrollable recurrent bleeding. Blood troponin-T, creatine kinase-MB, Hb, hematocrit (Hct) and complete electrocardiogram (ECG) were checked every 8 hours within 24 hours after enrollment. APACHE II, Rockall and Blatchford scores at intervention were calculated.19 This study was approved by the Research Ethics Review Committee of study institutes (FEMH IRB-103062-F, Hsin-Chu NTUH 105-001-F, Yun-Lin NTUH 201411020RIND).
Definition of failure to control hemorrhage The time frame for acute bleeding episode was defined as 24 hours after enrollment. Clinical failure of control bleeding was defined as: hematemesis or nasogastric tube drainage of significant fresh blood (≥ 200 mL) ≥ 2hours, or persistent hypovolemic shock after intervention; or 3 g/dl drop in Hb level (or 9% drop of Hct) within 24 hours if no blood transfusion; or a decrease in Hb ≥ 2 g/dL or an increase ≤ 1 g/dL, despite 2 or more units of red blood cells (RBC) component transfusion within 24 hours.
Definition of re-bleeding:
Clinically significant recurrent bleeding was defined by the followings: vomiting of fresh blood, fresh blood in the nasogastric tube aspirate, hematochezia or melena after a normal color stool, and a decrease in Hb ≥ 2 g/dL or an increase less than 1 g/dL, despite 2 or more units of RBC component transfusion.
Definition of major and minor complications Major complications were defined as death and life-threatening arrhythmias within 24 hours after randomization. Minor complications were defined as hypotension (<90/60mmHg), hypertension (>180/100mmHg), tachycardia (>120bpm), bradycardia (<60bpm), tachypnea (>24/min.), oxygen desaturation (SpO2 <90%), and minor arrhythmias.
Sample Size Estimation and Randomization The null hypothesis of this study was the superiority of EE over non-EE in the efficacy on bleeding control. The primary efficacy analysis used an intention-to-treat approach that included all patients meeting the entry criteria who had completed the follow-up. Approximately 80% of UGIB patients will stop bleeding spontaneously,20 and rates of hemostasis that resulted from a first endoscopic procedure exceeded 94% in most large studies.21 However, there was no data demonstrating the outcome of patients under DAPT developing acute UGIB treated medically alone. Therefore, we assumed that about 70% of acute UGIB patients under DAPT would stop bleeding spontaneously without therapeutic endoscopy. As a result, we estimated a sample size of at least totally 78 patients in EE and non-EE groups in order to achieve a statistical power of 80% at a 5% significance level on a two-tailed test, with margin of error of 2% in order to detect a 24% (94% vs. 70%) difference. Sealed envelopes with computer generated randomization number (0 for non-EE, 1 for EE group) were used. After enrollment, gastroenterologists opened the consecutive envelops for randomization.
Statistical Analysis Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and the comparisons between two groups were performed using the Student t-test; categorical variables were summarized as count (%) and the comparisons between groups were made using the Chi-square or the Fisher's exact test when appropriate. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were performed for evaluation of the risk factors for outcomes in both groups. A two-tailed p value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. The statistical analysis was performed using STATA software (version 11.0; Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| early endoscopy | Experimental | Other: endoscopic hemostasisendoscopic hemostasis |
| without early endoscopy | No intervention | –Patients assigned to non-endoscopic treatment group receive high dose infusional PPI therapy. If UGI bleeding subsided after medical treatment alone, diagnostic EGD will be done under stable hemodynamic and 2 weeks after ACS to confirm UGI SRH. If the SRH is not located at UGI tract, the patients will be excluded. Troponin I or T and complete ECG will be checked every 8 hours within 24 hours of interventions. APACHE II score at intervention will be calculated for each patient. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Patients with recent (< 2 weeks) ACS and acute upper GI bleeding accompanied with a decrease in hemoglobin (Hb) level greater than 2 g/dl
- Malignancy or other advanced disease with a life expectancy of < 6 months
- Pregnant or lactating women
- History of allergy or severe side effects to PPIs, contrast, and iodine
- Bleeding tendency, and platelet count < 80k/uL, prothrombin time INR >2.0
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| endoscopic hemostasisAt endoscopy, stigmata of hemorrhage (SRH) will be treated by dual endoscopic local therapy (combining at least two of the following treatments: epinephrine injection, coaptive thermocoagulation, hemoclip therapy, argon plasma coagulation, bipolar coagulation). | Other | early endoscopy |
Primary outcome
Failure of control hemorrhage
Time frame: 24 hours
Hematemesis or nasogastric tube drainage of significant fresh blood (≧200 mL) ≧2hours after a specific treatment (therapeutic endoscopy, medical control, transarterial embolization (TAE) or surgery); or Persistent hypovolemic shock; or 3 g/dl drop in Hb level (or 9% drop of Hct) within 24 hours if no transfusion is administered; or A decrease in Hb greater than 2 g/dL or an increase in Hb less than 1 g/dL, despite 2 or more units of blood transfused within 24 hours.
5 secondary outcomes
Complication rates
Time frame: 24 hours
length of hospital stay
Time frame: 14 days
units of blood transfusion
Time frame: 24 hours
re-bleeding rate
Time frame: 72 hours
needs for repeated intervention
Time frame: 72 hours
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Slow enrollment speed due to the incidence of UGI bleeding in ACS patient is lower than expected.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Dec 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35388113Chung CS, Chen CC, Chen KC, Fang YJ, Hsu WF, Chen YN, Tseng WC, Lin CK, Lee TH, Wang HP, Wu YW. Randomized controlled trial of early endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in acute coronary syndrome patients. Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 6;12(1):5798. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09911-5.
Related trials for Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Recruiting
Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Phase III Trial of Biological Mesh for Alimentary Tract Reconstruction in Digestive Surgery
Digestive System Surgical Procedures, Anastomosis, Surgical
RecruitingObservational study
Treatment Outcomes and Predictors After Endovascular Intervention for Portal Hypertension-Related Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Cirrhosis
Cirrhosis, Portal Hypertension Related to Cirrhosis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Resumption of Anticoagulation After Major Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation (AF), Major Gastrointestinal Bleeding (MGIB)
RecruitingPhase 2
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Radiation-Induced Proctopathy
Radiation Induced Proctitis
Recruiting
OTSC vs. Angiographic Embolization in Patients With Refractory Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing endoscopic hemostasis in people with Gastrointestinal Bleeding, run by Far Eastern Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Dec 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Slow enrollment speed due to the incidence of UGI bleeding in ACS patient is lower than expected.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Failure of control hemorrhage (time frame: 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02618980, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Dec 2021.