AzTrials
AzTrials

Tourette's SyndromePhase 2STN-DBSinTSNCT02619084

Subthalamic Stimulation in Tourette's Syndrome

A Phase 2 study testing STN DBS in people with Tourette's Syndrome and Tourette Syndrome, run by Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The main objective of this project is to evaluate the efficacy of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) in treating motor and phonic tics in medically refractory Tourette's syndrome (TS). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years
What is being tested?
STN DBS
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
10 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
Dec 2011to Dec 2015
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age at least of 18 years (with potential exceptions)
  • Diagnosis of TS based on the diagnostic criteria of the Tourette Syndrome Classification Study Group
  • A Yale Tic Global Severity Scale (YTGSS) > 35/50 for at least 12 months, with tic severity documented by a standardized videotape assessment
  • Inadequate response to standard drug treatment or botulinum toxin

Who cannot join

  • Diagnosis of secondary tic disorder, of heredodegenerative or neurometabolic diseases or history of toxic exposures or encephalitis
  • Previous surgery for TS (with potential exceptions)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • Fondazione IRCCS Istituto neurologico Carlo Besta

    Milan, Milan, 20133

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Tourette's Syndrome

The main objective of this project is to evaluate the efficacy of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) in treating motor and phonic tics in medically refractory Tourette's syndrome (TS).

Secondary objectives are to individuate and standardize the best electrical parameters for STN stimulation in TS, to evaluate the efficacy and safety on non-motor TS features, such as behavioral abnormalities and psychiatric disorders, during chronic STN stimulation, to correlate the improvement of TS motor and non-motor symptoms to the modification in brain activity recorded by PET study and to explore the pathophysiology of TS, and to evaluate the safety of STN DBS in TS patients.

Read the detailed description

Background Tourette's syndrome (TS) is characterized by the occurrence, before 18 years of age, of multiple motor and vocal tics, which do not necessarily occur concomitantly. Tics constitute the clinical hallmark of TS; they are sudden, brief, intermittent involuntary (or semi-involuntary) movements (motor tics) or noises (sound tics). Tic severity is variable: some patients have mild or bearable tics, whereas in others tics are so severe to cause bone fractures or cervical myelopathy. Diagnostic criteria set by the Tourette Syndrome Classification Study Group and the American Psychiatric Association are commonly used. It is currently recognized that TS is far more common than previously thought, with a prevalence of 1 to 10 children of adolescents per 1000.

Tics are usually treated in cases where disability at school, in the social environment or at home is severe enough to warrant medical intervention. TS commonly presents with co-morbid features, mainly consisting in obsessive-compulsive traits, attention deficit with hyperactivity disorder and depression. Psychopathologic features are partly an aftermath of tics, particularly in those patients who display severe tics affecting their social and work activities. Therefore, amelioration of tics may substantially improve daily life and adaptation to social and work environments.

Medication is the first choice treatment, with the aim to reduce the intensity of tics and the associated clinical features. Different drugs, belonging to several pharmacologic classes, such as α-adrenergic drugs, typical and atypical neuroleptics, and tetrabenazine are used. In some cases drug treatment provides satisfactory symptomatic benefit. Overall, it is reckoned that a meaningful proportion of TS patients do not have adequate benefit with drug treatment and the majority of patients have side effects of variable severity.

Ablative psychosurgery has been historically used to treat more severe cases of TS, but the results have been disappointing and burdened by irreversible side effects. The recently developed technique of deep brain stimulation (DBS) allows to selectively modulate the activity of brain structures that control movements and behaviors in patients with different neurological disorders. This approach is warranted in those patients who respond poorly to available medical therapy.

Recently, therapeutic DBS trials have been performed in patients with severe TS, who were not satisfactorily controlled by medication. At first, the same thalamic nuclei targeted by ablative surgery, particularly the centromedian-parafascicular (CM-pf) nuclear complex, have been implanted with some success.

Another anatomical target has been the anterior capsule in proximity of the nucleus accumbens or the nucleus accumbens itself, aiming at interfering with tics and obsessive-compulsive features at the same time. More recently, the globus pallidus internum (GPi) has been implanted. This constitutes the main output station of the basal ganglia towards the thalamus and the cerebral cortex.

Hypothesis driven rationales

  1. There is preliminary evidence that the subthalamic nucleus can be another promising target in treating motor and non-motor feature of TS. A clinical observation has recently shown that STN DBS improved motor and vocal tics in a patient with consistence of Parkinson's disease and TS
  2. Literature evidences have showed that stereotyped behaviors in nonhuman primates, resembling tics and compulsive disorders, were related to dysfunction of the limbic parts of the globus pallidus externum, the STN, and the SN reticulata, rather than to dysfunction of the GPi
  3. From a physiologic perspective, STN occupies a privileged position influencing both output nuclei of the basal ganglia, GPi and substantia nigra (SN) reticulata. Several findings have highlighted the putative role of the STN in integrating emotional, cognitive and motor functions and this nucleus would thus be an effective target for the treatment of conditions that combine motor symptoms, behavioral disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorders
  4. Involvement of the SN in TS was also found in a functional MRI study. Furthermore, stimulation of the anterior STN was effective in reducing stereotypes in a primate model of behavioral disorder and STN DBS in PD can also result in behavioral changes. Indeed, the small size of this nucleus may allow modulation of abnormal neuronal activity of both limbic and sensorimotor territories, more easily than GPi or thalamic DBS
  5. The small and well-defined volume of the STN combined with well standardized implant techniques, would lead to a reduced inter-patient variability in targeting

The novelty of the project The STN may be a potential target for DBS in TS. The choice of STN as a target for this project is the current model of basal ganglia functioning: this anatomical location aims at modulating the sensory-motor, associative and limbic subdivisions of cortico-subcortical-cortical loops that are thought to be dysfunctional in TS. STN DBS may provide a quicker relief of symptoms than medial thalamic nuclei or GPi stimulation.

The main objective of this project is to evaluate the efficacy of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) in treating motor and phonic tics in medically refractory Tourette's syndrome (TS).

Secondary objectives are to individuate and standardize the best electrical parameters for STN stimulation in TS, to evaluate the efficacy and safety on non-motor TS features, such as behavioral abnormalities and psychiatric disorders, during chronic STN stimulation, to correlate the improvement of TS motor and non-motor symptoms to the modification in brain activity recorded by PET study and to explore the pathophysiology of TS, and to evaluate the safety of STN DBS in TS patients.

Clinical evaluation will include a complete neurological examination (videotaped tic scales throughout), a structured psychological interview and a psychiatric evaluation. Quantitative evaluations will be performed using appropriate validated neurological (including the Yale Tic Global Severity Scale (YTGSS) and neuropsychological rating scales, including the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive scale (Y-BOCS), as detailed hereafter.

Neurological evaluations

  • Tourette's motor and phonic tics checklist
  • YTGSS
  • Global assessment scale (GAS)
  • Global Clinical Impression Scale (GCI-S)
  • Sickness Impact Profile (SIP)
  • Gilles de la Tourette syndrome-quality of life scale (GTS-QOL)

Behavioral evaluations

  • Y-BOCS
  • Depression (MADRS, HAM-D)
  • ADHD and Anxiety (ADHD-RS, HAM-A)

Neuropsychological evaluations

  • Global deterioration
  • Executive functions
  • Working memory
  • Fluency

Power calculation. A retrospective analysis of published data on DBS-treated TS patients reports an average YGTSS at inclusion of 50 ±15 points. This is in keeping with our inclusion criteria of YGTSS >35. Considering a 50% improvement as meaningful, a 25-point variation is expected from baseline to post-implant in the active stimulation group and a 10% 5-point variation in the sham stimulation group. The investigators assume a comparable standard deviation at baseline and at end of the observational periods and a good correlation of YGTSS measures (correlation coefficient: 0.8). An actual number of at least 5 patients per group should allow to demonstrate a 25-point YGTSS difference between the two active stimulation and the sham stimulation groups, with a statistical potency of 85% (bilateral Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test, alpha = 5 %).

Being tested
STN DBS
Keywords
Tourette Syndrome, Subthalamic Nucleus, STN, Deep Brain Stimulation, DBS, Tic, Obsessive-compulsive disorders
Medical subject headings
Tourette Syndrome, Tics, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • STN DBSProcedure or surgery

    Also called Deep Brain Stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus, Neurostimulators: Medtronic Activa® SC 37603, Extensions: Medtronic Model 37086, Leads: Medtronic Model 3389

    Bilateral STN DBS

Study groups in NCT02619084
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
STN DBS ON FirstExperimentalThe study will be performed according a randomized, double-blind, crossover design with two 3-month phases, during which the stimulation could be switched "on" or "off", separated by a 1-month washout period, At the end of the second double-blind phase, a further open period of 6 months with stimulation switched "on" will follow.
Receives: Procedure: STN DBS
STN DBS OFF FirstExperimentalThe study will be performed according a randomized, double-blind, crossover design with two 3-month phases, during which the stimulation could be switched "on" or "off", separated by a 1-month washout period, At the end of the second double-blind phase, a further open period of 6 months with stimulation switched "on" will follow.
Receives: Procedure: STN DBS

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Yale Global Tic Severity Scale

    Primary outcome measure will evaluate the efficacy of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) in controlling motor and phonic tics (by evaluating the reduction on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale - YGTSS) in patients with medically refractory Tourette syndrome (TS), in a study to be performed according a randomized, double-blind, crossover design with two 3-month phases, during which the stimulation could be switched "on" or "off", separated by a 1-month washout period.

    The assumption tested is that of a meaningful tic improvement by bilateral STN DBS (considered as ≥ 50% reduction in Yale Global Tic Severity Scale - YGTSS from baseline to post-implant in the active stimulation group). YGTSS is a semistructured clinician-rated instrument that assesses the severity and frequency of motor and phonic tics.

    Measured: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Change in Milan Overall Dementia Assessment (MODA)

    To evaluate the effects on TS neuropsychological features of STN stimulation. Assessments will be performed by administering the MODA (assessing specific neuropsychological tests, exploring the global deterioration, the executive functions, the working memory and fluency).

    Measured: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition

  2. Change in brain activity recorded by PET

    To correlate the improvement of TS motor and non-motor symptoms to the modification in brain activity recorded by PET study and to explore the pathophysiology of TS

    Measured: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition

  3. STN DBS safety in treating medically-refractory Tourette syndrome

    An analysis of adverse and side effects of surgery and STN stimulation will be performed during the whole observation period (24 months)

    Measured: 24 months

  4. Change in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive scale (Y-BOCS)

    One of the secondary outcome will measure the effect of STN DBS in controlling obsessive-compulsive features (by evaluating the change on the Y-BOCS) in patients with medically refractory TS

    Measured: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition

  5. Change in Global assessment scale (GAS).

    To evaluate the effects of STN stimulation on the overall functioning of a TS subjects during the specified time period on a continuum from psychological or psychiatric sickness to health. Assessments will be performed by administering the GAS.

    Measured: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition

  6. Change in Global Clinical Impression Scale (GCI-S)

    To evaluate the effects of STN stimulation on the overall status of a TS subjects during the specified time period. Assessments will be performed by administering the GCI-S.

    Measured: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition

  7. Change in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome-quality of life scale (GTS-QOL)

    To evaluate the effects of STN stimulation on the overall QoL of a TS subjects during the specified time period. Assessments will be performed by administering the GTS-QOL.

    Measured: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition

  8. Change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

    To evaluate the effects of STN stimulation on the depressive features of a TS subjects during the specified time period. Assessments will be performed by administering the MADRS.

    Measured: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition

  9. Change in ADHD Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS)

    To evaluate the effects of STN stimulation on the ADHD symptoms of a TS subjects during the specified time period. Assessments will be performed by administering the ADHD-RS.

    Measured: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition

  10. Change in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A)

    To evaluate the effects of STN stimulation on the anxiety symptoms of a TS subjects during the specified time period. Assessments will be performed by administering the HAM-A.

    Measured: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Dec 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2011
  3. Primary completionDec 2015
  4. Study completionDec 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
10 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02619084
Sponsor's protocol ID
RF-131
Other IDs
GR-2009-1594645
Acronym
STN-DBSinTS
Status last verified
Feb 2016
First submitted
2 Oct 2015
Last updated
23 Feb 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • de la Tourette G. Étude sur une affection nerveuse caractérisée par l'incoordination motrice accompagnée d'écholalie et de coprolalie. Arch Neurol 1885;9:158-200

  • Jankovic J. Tourette's syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2001 Oct 18;345(16):1184-92. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra010032. No abstract available.

    PubMed 11642235
  • Leckman JF. Phenomenology of tics and natural history of tic disorders. Brain Dev. 2003 Dec;25 Suppl 1:S24-8. doi: 10.1016/s0387-7604(03)90004-0.

    PubMed 14980368
  • Fahn S. The clinical spectrum of motor tics. Adv Neurol. 1982;35:341-4. No abstract available.

    PubMed 7148580
  • Brill CB, Hartz WH, Mancall EL. Cervical disc herniation in the Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. Ann Neurol. 1981 Mar;9(3):311. doi: 10.1002/ana.410090323. No abstract available.

    PubMed 6939410
  • Definitions and classification of tic disorders. The Tourette Syndrome Classification Study Group. Arch Neurol. 1993 Oct;50(10):1013-6. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1993.00540100012008.

    PubMed 8215958
  • American Psychiatric Association. DSM-IV-TR Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, IV ed. Washington DC and London: 2000

  • Kurlan R, McDermott MP, Deeley C, Como PG, Brower C, Eapen S, Andresen EM, Miller B. Prevalence of tics in schoolchildren and association with placement in special education. Neurology. 2001 Oct 23;57(8):1383-8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.8.1383.

    PubMed 11673576
  • Robertson MM. The prevalence and epidemiology of Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. Part 1: the epidemiological and prevalence studies. J Psychosom Res. 2008 Nov;65(5):461-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.03.006. Epub 2008 Oct 2.

    PubMed 18940377
  • Lombroso PJ, Scahill L. Tourette syndrome and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Brain Dev. 2008 Apr;30(4):231-7. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2007.09.001. Epub 2007 Oct 15.

    PubMed 17937978
  • Singer HS. Tourette's syndrome: from behaviour to biology. Lancet Neurol. 2005 Mar;4(3):149-59. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(05)01012-4.

    PubMed 15721825
  • Scahill L, Erenberg G, Berlin CM Jr, Budman C, Coffey BJ, Jankovic J, Kiessling L, King RA, Kurlan R, Lang A, Mink J, Murphy T, Zinner S, Walkup J; Tourette Syndrome Association Medical Advisory Board: Practice Committee. Contemporary assessment and pharmacotherapy of Tourette syndrome. NeuroRx. 2006 Apr;3(2):192-206. doi: 10.1016/j.nurx.2006.01.009.

    PubMed 16554257
  • Kenney C, Jankovic J. Tetrabenazine in the treatment of hyperkinetic movement disorders. Expert Rev Neurother. 2006 Jan;6(1):7-17. doi: 10.1586/14737175.6.1.7.

    PubMed 16466307
  • Silay YS, Jankovic J. Emerging drugs in Tourette syndrome. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2005 May;10(2):365-80. doi: 10.1517/14728214.10.2.365.

    PubMed 15934872
  • de Divitiis E, D'Errico A, Cerillo A. Stereotactic surgery in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1977;(Suppl 24):73. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-8482-0_12. No abstract available.

    PubMed 335809

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing STN DBS in people with Tourette's Syndrome and Tourette Syndrome, run by Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (time frame: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02619084, which also lists 47 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2016.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in