Tourette's SyndromePhase 2STN-DBSinTSNCT02619084
Subthalamic Stimulation in Tourette's Syndrome
A Phase 2 study testing STN DBS in people with Tourette's Syndrome and Tourette Syndrome, run by Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
The main objective of this project is to evaluate the efficacy of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) in treating motor and phonic tics in medically refractory Tourette's syndrome (TS). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Tourette's Syndrome, Tourette Syndrome, Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- STN DBS
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- Dec 2011to Dec 2015
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age at least of 18 years (with potential exceptions)
- Diagnosis of TS based on the diagnostic criteria of the Tourette Syndrome Classification Study Group
- A Yale Tic Global Severity Scale (YTGSS) > 35/50 for at least 12 months, with tic severity documented by a standardized videotape assessment
- Inadequate response to standard drug treatment or botulinum toxin
Who cannot join
- Diagnosis of secondary tic disorder, of heredodegenerative or neurometabolic diseases or history of toxic exposures or encephalitis
- Previous surgery for TS (with potential exceptions)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto neurologico Carlo Besta
Milan, Milan, 20133
About this study
Official title: Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Tourette's Syndrome
The main objective of this project is to evaluate the efficacy of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) in treating motor and phonic tics in medically refractory Tourette's syndrome (TS).
Secondary objectives are to individuate and standardize the best electrical parameters for STN stimulation in TS, to evaluate the efficacy and safety on non-motor TS features, such as behavioral abnormalities and psychiatric disorders, during chronic STN stimulation, to correlate the improvement of TS motor and non-motor symptoms to the modification in brain activity recorded by PET study and to explore the pathophysiology of TS, and to evaluate the safety of STN DBS in TS patients.
Read the detailed description
Background Tourette's syndrome (TS) is characterized by the occurrence, before 18 years of age, of multiple motor and vocal tics, which do not necessarily occur concomitantly. Tics constitute the clinical hallmark of TS; they are sudden, brief, intermittent involuntary (or semi-involuntary) movements (motor tics) or noises (sound tics). Tic severity is variable: some patients have mild or bearable tics, whereas in others tics are so severe to cause bone fractures or cervical myelopathy. Diagnostic criteria set by the Tourette Syndrome Classification Study Group and the American Psychiatric Association are commonly used. It is currently recognized that TS is far more common than previously thought, with a prevalence of 1 to 10 children of adolescents per 1000.
Tics are usually treated in cases where disability at school, in the social environment or at home is severe enough to warrant medical intervention. TS commonly presents with co-morbid features, mainly consisting in obsessive-compulsive traits, attention deficit with hyperactivity disorder and depression. Psychopathologic features are partly an aftermath of tics, particularly in those patients who display severe tics affecting their social and work activities. Therefore, amelioration of tics may substantially improve daily life and adaptation to social and work environments.
Medication is the first choice treatment, with the aim to reduce the intensity of tics and the associated clinical features. Different drugs, belonging to several pharmacologic classes, such as α-adrenergic drugs, typical and atypical neuroleptics, and tetrabenazine are used. In some cases drug treatment provides satisfactory symptomatic benefit. Overall, it is reckoned that a meaningful proportion of TS patients do not have adequate benefit with drug treatment and the majority of patients have side effects of variable severity.
Ablative psychosurgery has been historically used to treat more severe cases of TS, but the results have been disappointing and burdened by irreversible side effects. The recently developed technique of deep brain stimulation (DBS) allows to selectively modulate the activity of brain structures that control movements and behaviors in patients with different neurological disorders. This approach is warranted in those patients who respond poorly to available medical therapy.
Recently, therapeutic DBS trials have been performed in patients with severe TS, who were not satisfactorily controlled by medication. At first, the same thalamic nuclei targeted by ablative surgery, particularly the centromedian-parafascicular (CM-pf) nuclear complex, have been implanted with some success.
Another anatomical target has been the anterior capsule in proximity of the nucleus accumbens or the nucleus accumbens itself, aiming at interfering with tics and obsessive-compulsive features at the same time. More recently, the globus pallidus internum (GPi) has been implanted. This constitutes the main output station of the basal ganglia towards the thalamus and the cerebral cortex.
Hypothesis driven rationales
- There is preliminary evidence that the subthalamic nucleus can be another promising target in treating motor and non-motor feature of TS. A clinical observation has recently shown that STN DBS improved motor and vocal tics in a patient with consistence of Parkinson's disease and TS
- Literature evidences have showed that stereotyped behaviors in nonhuman primates, resembling tics and compulsive disorders, were related to dysfunction of the limbic parts of the globus pallidus externum, the STN, and the SN reticulata, rather than to dysfunction of the GPi
- From a physiologic perspective, STN occupies a privileged position influencing both output nuclei of the basal ganglia, GPi and substantia nigra (SN) reticulata. Several findings have highlighted the putative role of the STN in integrating emotional, cognitive and motor functions and this nucleus would thus be an effective target for the treatment of conditions that combine motor symptoms, behavioral disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorders
- Involvement of the SN in TS was also found in a functional MRI study. Furthermore, stimulation of the anterior STN was effective in reducing stereotypes in a primate model of behavioral disorder and STN DBS in PD can also result in behavioral changes. Indeed, the small size of this nucleus may allow modulation of abnormal neuronal activity of both limbic and sensorimotor territories, more easily than GPi or thalamic DBS
- The small and well-defined volume of the STN combined with well standardized implant techniques, would lead to a reduced inter-patient variability in targeting
The novelty of the project The STN may be a potential target for DBS in TS. The choice of STN as a target for this project is the current model of basal ganglia functioning: this anatomical location aims at modulating the sensory-motor, associative and limbic subdivisions of cortico-subcortical-cortical loops that are thought to be dysfunctional in TS. STN DBS may provide a quicker relief of symptoms than medial thalamic nuclei or GPi stimulation.
The main objective of this project is to evaluate the efficacy of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) in treating motor and phonic tics in medically refractory Tourette's syndrome (TS).
Secondary objectives are to individuate and standardize the best electrical parameters for STN stimulation in TS, to evaluate the efficacy and safety on non-motor TS features, such as behavioral abnormalities and psychiatric disorders, during chronic STN stimulation, to correlate the improvement of TS motor and non-motor symptoms to the modification in brain activity recorded by PET study and to explore the pathophysiology of TS, and to evaluate the safety of STN DBS in TS patients.
Clinical evaluation will include a complete neurological examination (videotaped tic scales throughout), a structured psychological interview and a psychiatric evaluation. Quantitative evaluations will be performed using appropriate validated neurological (including the Yale Tic Global Severity Scale (YTGSS) and neuropsychological rating scales, including the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive scale (Y-BOCS), as detailed hereafter.
Neurological evaluations
- Tourette's motor and phonic tics checklist
- YTGSS
- Global assessment scale (GAS)
- Global Clinical Impression Scale (GCI-S)
- Sickness Impact Profile (SIP)
- Gilles de la Tourette syndrome-quality of life scale (GTS-QOL)
Behavioral evaluations
- Y-BOCS
- Depression (MADRS, HAM-D)
- ADHD and Anxiety (ADHD-RS, HAM-A)
Neuropsychological evaluations
- Global deterioration
- Executive functions
- Working memory
- Fluency
Power calculation. A retrospective analysis of published data on DBS-treated TS patients reports an average YGTSS at inclusion of 50 ±15 points. This is in keeping with our inclusion criteria of YGTSS >35. Considering a 50% improvement as meaningful, a 25-point variation is expected from baseline to post-implant in the active stimulation group and a 10% 5-point variation in the sham stimulation group. The investigators assume a comparable standard deviation at baseline and at end of the observational periods and a good correlation of YGTSS measures (correlation coefficient: 0.8). An actual number of at least 5 patients per group should allow to demonstrate a 25-point YGTSS difference between the two active stimulation and the sham stimulation groups, with a statistical potency of 85% (bilateral Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test, alpha = 5 %).
- Being tested
- STN DBS
- Keywords
- Tourette Syndrome, Subthalamic Nucleus, STN, Deep Brain Stimulation, DBS, Tic, Obsessive-compulsive disorders
- Medical subject headings
- Tourette Syndrome, Tics, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
STN DBSProcedure or surgery
Also called Deep Brain Stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus, Neurostimulators: Medtronic Activa® SC 37603, Extensions: Medtronic Model 37086, Leads: Medtronic Model 3389
Bilateral STN DBS
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| STN DBS ON First | Experimental | The study will be performed according a randomized, double-blind, crossover design with two 3-month phases, during which the stimulation could be switched "on" or "off", separated by a 1-month washout period, At the end of the second double-blind phase, a further open period of 6 months with stimulation switched "on" will follow. Receives: Procedure: STN DBS |
| STN DBS OFF First | Experimental | The study will be performed according a randomized, double-blind, crossover design with two 3-month phases, during which the stimulation could be switched "on" or "off", separated by a 1-month washout period, At the end of the second double-blind phase, a further open period of 6 months with stimulation switched "on" will follow. Receives: Procedure: STN DBS |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Yale Global Tic Severity Scale
Primary outcome measure will evaluate the efficacy of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) in controlling motor and phonic tics (by evaluating the reduction on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale - YGTSS) in patients with medically refractory Tourette syndrome (TS), in a study to be performed according a randomized, double-blind, crossover design with two 3-month phases, during which the stimulation could be switched "on" or "off", separated by a 1-month washout period.
The assumption tested is that of a meaningful tic improvement by bilateral STN DBS (considered as ≥ 50% reduction in Yale Global Tic Severity Scale - YGTSS from baseline to post-implant in the active stimulation group). YGTSS is a semistructured clinician-rated instrument that assesses the severity and frequency of motor and phonic tics.
Measured: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition
Secondary outcomes (10)
Change in Milan Overall Dementia Assessment (MODA)
To evaluate the effects on TS neuropsychological features of STN stimulation. Assessments will be performed by administering the MODA (assessing specific neuropsychological tests, exploring the global deterioration, the executive functions, the working memory and fluency).
Measured: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition
Change in brain activity recorded by PET
To correlate the improvement of TS motor and non-motor symptoms to the modification in brain activity recorded by PET study and to explore the pathophysiology of TS
Measured: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition
STN DBS safety in treating medically-refractory Tourette syndrome
An analysis of adverse and side effects of surgery and STN stimulation will be performed during the whole observation period (24 months)
Measured: 24 months
Change in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive scale (Y-BOCS)
One of the secondary outcome will measure the effect of STN DBS in controlling obsessive-compulsive features (by evaluating the change on the Y-BOCS) in patients with medically refractory TS
Measured: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition
Change in Global assessment scale (GAS).
To evaluate the effects of STN stimulation on the overall functioning of a TS subjects during the specified time period on a continuum from psychological or psychiatric sickness to health. Assessments will be performed by administering the GAS.
Measured: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition
Change in Global Clinical Impression Scale (GCI-S)
To evaluate the effects of STN stimulation on the overall status of a TS subjects during the specified time period. Assessments will be performed by administering the GCI-S.
Measured: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition
Change in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome-quality of life scale (GTS-QOL)
To evaluate the effects of STN stimulation on the overall QoL of a TS subjects during the specified time period. Assessments will be performed by administering the GTS-QOL.
Measured: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition
Change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
To evaluate the effects of STN stimulation on the depressive features of a TS subjects during the specified time period. Assessments will be performed by administering the MADRS.
Measured: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition
Change in ADHD Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS)
To evaluate the effects of STN stimulation on the ADHD symptoms of a TS subjects during the specified time period. Assessments will be performed by administering the ADHD-RS.
Measured: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition
Change in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A)
To evaluate the effects of STN stimulation on the anxiety symptoms of a TS subjects during the specified time period. Assessments will be performed by administering the HAM-A.
Measured: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2011
- Primary completionDec 2015
- Study completionDec 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (47)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Tourette's SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, Italy
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Luigi M. Romito, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta
- Investigators
- Luigi M Romito, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milano, Italy
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02619084
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RF-131
- Other IDs
- GR-2009-1594645
- Acronym
- STN-DBSinTS
- Status last verified
- Feb 2016
- First submitted
- 2 Oct 2015
- Last updated
- 23 Feb 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
de la Tourette G. Étude sur une affection nerveuse caractérisée par l'incoordination motrice accompagnée d'écholalie et de coprolalie. Arch Neurol 1885;9:158-200
Jankovic J. Tourette's syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2001 Oct 18;345(16):1184-92. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra010032. No abstract available.
PubMed 11642235Leckman JF. Phenomenology of tics and natural history of tic disorders. Brain Dev. 2003 Dec;25 Suppl 1:S24-8. doi: 10.1016/s0387-7604(03)90004-0.
PubMed 14980368Fahn S. The clinical spectrum of motor tics. Adv Neurol. 1982;35:341-4. No abstract available.
PubMed 7148580Brill CB, Hartz WH, Mancall EL. Cervical disc herniation in the Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. Ann Neurol. 1981 Mar;9(3):311. doi: 10.1002/ana.410090323. No abstract available.
PubMed 6939410Definitions and classification of tic disorders. The Tourette Syndrome Classification Study Group. Arch Neurol. 1993 Oct;50(10):1013-6. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1993.00540100012008.
PubMed 8215958American Psychiatric Association. DSM-IV-TR Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, IV ed. Washington DC and London: 2000
Kurlan R, McDermott MP, Deeley C, Como PG, Brower C, Eapen S, Andresen EM, Miller B. Prevalence of tics in schoolchildren and association with placement in special education. Neurology. 2001 Oct 23;57(8):1383-8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.8.1383.
PubMed 11673576Robertson MM. The prevalence and epidemiology of Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. Part 1: the epidemiological and prevalence studies. J Psychosom Res. 2008 Nov;65(5):461-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.03.006. Epub 2008 Oct 2.
PubMed 18940377Lombroso PJ, Scahill L. Tourette syndrome and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Brain Dev. 2008 Apr;30(4):231-7. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2007.09.001. Epub 2007 Oct 15.
PubMed 17937978Singer HS. Tourette's syndrome: from behaviour to biology. Lancet Neurol. 2005 Mar;4(3):149-59. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(05)01012-4.
PubMed 15721825Scahill L, Erenberg G, Berlin CM Jr, Budman C, Coffey BJ, Jankovic J, Kiessling L, King RA, Kurlan R, Lang A, Mink J, Murphy T, Zinner S, Walkup J; Tourette Syndrome Association Medical Advisory Board: Practice Committee. Contemporary assessment and pharmacotherapy of Tourette syndrome. NeuroRx. 2006 Apr;3(2):192-206. doi: 10.1016/j.nurx.2006.01.009.
PubMed 16554257Kenney C, Jankovic J. Tetrabenazine in the treatment of hyperkinetic movement disorders. Expert Rev Neurother. 2006 Jan;6(1):7-17. doi: 10.1586/14737175.6.1.7.
PubMed 16466307Silay YS, Jankovic J. Emerging drugs in Tourette syndrome. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2005 May;10(2):365-80. doi: 10.1517/14728214.10.2.365.
PubMed 15934872de Divitiis E, D'Errico A, Cerillo A. Stereotactic surgery in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1977;(Suppl 24):73. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-8482-0_12. No abstract available.
PubMed 335809
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Feb 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Tourette's Syndrome
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02619084
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STN-DBSinTS / RF-131
- Keywords
- Tourette Syndrome, Subthalamic Nucleus, STN, Deep Brain Stimulation, DBS, Tic, Obsessive-compulsive disorders
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo BestaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, Italy
- Study start
- Dec 2011
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main objective of this project is to evaluate the efficacy of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) in treating motor and phonic tics in medically refractory Tourette's syndrome (TS).
Secondary objectives are to individuate and standardize the best electrical parameters for STN stimulation in TS, to evaluate the efficacy and safety on non-motor TS features, such as behavioral abnormalities and psychiatric disorders, during chronic STN stimulation, to correlate the improvement of TS motor and non-motor symptoms to the modification in brain activity recorded by PET study and to explore the pathophysiology of TS, and to evaluate the safety of STN DBS in TS patients.
Detailed description
Background Tourette's syndrome (TS) is characterized by the occurrence, before 18 years of age, of multiple motor and vocal tics, which do not necessarily occur concomitantly. Tics constitute the clinical hallmark of TS; they are sudden, brief, intermittent involuntary (or semi-involuntary) movements (motor tics) or noises (sound tics). Tic severity is variable: some patients have mild or bearable tics, whereas in others tics are so severe to cause bone fractures or cervical myelopathy. Diagnostic criteria set by the Tourette Syndrome Classification Study Group and the American Psychiatric Association are commonly used. It is currently recognized that TS is far more common than previously thought, with a prevalence of 1 to 10 children of adolescents per 1000.
Tics are usually treated in cases where disability at school, in the social environment or at home is severe enough to warrant medical intervention. TS commonly presents with co-morbid features, mainly consisting in obsessive-compulsive traits, attention deficit with hyperactivity disorder and depression. Psychopathologic features are partly an aftermath of tics, particularly in those patients who display severe tics affecting their social and work activities. Therefore, amelioration of tics may substantially improve daily life and adaptation to social and work environments.
Medication is the first choice treatment, with the aim to reduce the intensity of tics and the associated clinical features. Different drugs, belonging to several pharmacologic classes, such as α-adrenergic drugs, typical and atypical neuroleptics, and tetrabenazine are used. In some cases drug treatment provides satisfactory symptomatic benefit. Overall, it is reckoned that a meaningful proportion of TS patients do not have adequate benefit with drug treatment and the majority of patients have side effects of variable severity.
Ablative psychosurgery has been historically used to treat more severe cases of TS, but the results have been disappointing and burdened by irreversible side effects. The recently developed technique of deep brain stimulation (DBS) allows to selectively modulate the activity of brain structures that control movements and behaviors in patients with different neurological disorders. This approach is warranted in those patients who respond poorly to available medical therapy.
Recently, therapeutic DBS trials have been performed in patients with severe TS, who were not satisfactorily controlled by medication. At first, the same thalamic nuclei targeted by ablative surgery, particularly the centromedian-parafascicular (CM-pf) nuclear complex, have been implanted with some success.
Another anatomical target has been the anterior capsule in proximity of the nucleus accumbens or the nucleus accumbens itself, aiming at interfering with tics and obsessive-compulsive features at the same time. More recently, the globus pallidus internum (GPi) has been implanted. This constitutes the main output station of the basal ganglia towards the thalamus and the cerebral cortex.
Hypothesis driven rationales
- There is preliminary evidence that the subthalamic nucleus can be another promising target in treating motor and non-motor feature of TS. A clinical observation has recently shown that STN DBS improved motor and vocal tics in a patient with consistence of Parkinson's disease and TS
- Literature evidences have showed that stereotyped behaviors in nonhuman primates, resembling tics and compulsive disorders, were related to dysfunction of the limbic parts of the globus pallidus externum, the STN, and the SN reticulata, rather than to dysfunction of the GPi
- From a physiologic perspective, STN occupies a privileged position influencing both output nuclei of the basal ganglia, GPi and substantia nigra (SN) reticulata. Several findings have highlighted the putative role of the STN in integrating emotional, cognitive and motor functions and this nucleus would thus be an effective target for the treatment of conditions that combine motor symptoms, behavioral disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorders
- Involvement of the SN in TS was also found in a functional MRI study. Furthermore, stimulation of the anterior STN was effective in reducing stereotypes in a primate model of behavioral disorder and STN DBS in PD can also result in behavioral changes. Indeed, the small size of this nucleus may allow modulation of abnormal neuronal activity of both limbic and sensorimotor territories, more easily than GPi or thalamic DBS
- The small and well-defined volume of the STN combined with well standardized implant techniques, would lead to a reduced inter-patient variability in targeting
The novelty of the project The STN may be a potential target for DBS in TS. The choice of STN as a target for this project is the current model of basal ganglia functioning: this anatomical location aims at modulating the sensory-motor, associative and limbic subdivisions of cortico-subcortical-cortical loops that are thought to be dysfunctional in TS. STN DBS may provide a quicker relief of symptoms than medial thalamic nuclei or GPi stimulation.
The main objective of this project is to evaluate the efficacy of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) in treating motor and phonic tics in medically refractory Tourette's syndrome (TS).
Secondary objectives are to individuate and standardize the best electrical parameters for STN stimulation in TS, to evaluate the efficacy and safety on non-motor TS features, such as behavioral abnormalities and psychiatric disorders, during chronic STN stimulation, to correlate the improvement of TS motor and non-motor symptoms to the modification in brain activity recorded by PET study and to explore the pathophysiology of TS, and to evaluate the safety of STN DBS in TS patients.
Clinical evaluation will include a complete neurological examination (videotaped tic scales throughout), a structured psychological interview and a psychiatric evaluation. Quantitative evaluations will be performed using appropriate validated neurological (including the Yale Tic Global Severity Scale (YTGSS) and neuropsychological rating scales, including the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive scale (Y-BOCS), as detailed hereafter.
Neurological evaluations
- Tourette's motor and phonic tics checklist
- YTGSS
- Global assessment scale (GAS)
- Global Clinical Impression Scale (GCI-S)
- Sickness Impact Profile (SIP)
- Gilles de la Tourette syndrome-quality of life scale (GTS-QOL)
Behavioral evaluations
- Y-BOCS
- Depression (MADRS, HAM-D)
- ADHD and Anxiety (ADHD-RS, HAM-A)
Neuropsychological evaluations
- Global deterioration
- Executive functions
- Working memory
- Fluency
Power calculation. A retrospective analysis of published data on DBS-treated TS patients reports an average YGTSS at inclusion of 50 ±15 points. This is in keeping with our inclusion criteria of YGTSS >35. Considering a 50% improvement as meaningful, a 25-point variation is expected from baseline to post-implant in the active stimulation group and a 10% 5-point variation in the sham stimulation group. The investigators assume a comparable standard deviation at baseline and at end of the observational periods and a good correlation of YGTSS measures (correlation coefficient: 0.8). An actual number of at least 5 patients per group should allow to demonstrate a 25-point YGTSS difference between the two active stimulation and the sham stimulation groups, with a statistical potency of 85% (bilateral Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test, alpha = 5 %).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| STN DBS ON First | Experimental | Procedure: STN DBSThe study will be performed according a randomized, double-blind, crossover design with two 3-month phases, during which the stimulation could be switched "on" or "off", separated by a 1-month washout period, At the end of the second double-blind phase, a further open period of 6 months with stimulation switched "on" will follow. |
| STN DBS OFF First | Experimental | Procedure: STN DBSThe study will be performed according a randomized, double-blind, crossover design with two 3-month phases, during which the stimulation could be switched "on" or "off", separated by a 1-month washout period, At the end of the second double-blind phase, a further open period of 6 months with stimulation switched "on" will follow. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age at least of 18 years (with potential exceptions)
- Diagnosis of TS based on the diagnostic criteria of the Tourette Syndrome Classification Study Group
- A Yale Tic Global Severity Scale (YTGSS) > 35/50 for at least 12 months, with tic severity documented by a standardized videotape assessment
- Inadequate response to standard drug treatment or botulinum toxin
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Diagnosis of secondary tic disorder, of heredodegenerative or neurometabolic diseases or history of toxic exposures or encephalitis
- Previous surgery for TS (with potential exceptions)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| STN DBSAlso: Deep Brain Stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus, Neurostimulators: Medtronic Activa® SC 37603, Extensions: Medtronic Model 37086, Leads: Medtronic Model 3389Bilateral STN DBS | Procedure or surgery | STN DBS OFF First, STN DBS ON First |
Primary outcome
Change in Yale Global Tic Severity Scale
Time frame: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition
Primary outcome measure will evaluate the efficacy of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) in controlling motor and phonic tics (by evaluating the reduction on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale - YGTSS) in patients with medically refractory Tourette syndrome (TS), in a study to be performed according a randomized, double-blind, crossover design with two 3-month phases, during which the stimulation could be switched "on" or "off", separated by a 1-month washout period. The assumption tested is that of a meaningful tic improvement by bilateral STN DBS (considered as ≥ 50% reduction in Yale Global Tic Severity Scale - YGTSS from baseline to post-implant in the active stimulation group). YGTSS is a semistructured clinician-rated instrument that assesses the severity and frequency of motor and phonic tics.
10 secondary outcomes
Change in Milan Overall Dementia Assessment (MODA)
Time frame: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition
Change in brain activity recorded by PET
Time frame: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition
STN DBS safety in treating medically-refractory Tourette syndrome
Time frame: 24 months
Change in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive scale (Y-BOCS)
Time frame: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition
Change in Global assessment scale (GAS).
Time frame: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition
Change in Global Clinical Impression Scale (GCI-S)
Time frame: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition
Change in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome-quality of life scale (GTS-QOL)
Time frame: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition
Change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Time frame: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition
Change in ADHD Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS)
Time frame: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition
Change in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A)
Time frame: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Feb 2016.
- Backgroundde la Tourette G. Étude sur une affection nerveuse caractérisée par l'incoordination motrice accompagnée d'écholalie et de coprolalie. Arch Neurol 1885;9:158-200
- Background: PubMed 11642235Jankovic J. Tourette's syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2001 Oct 18;345(16):1184-92. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra010032. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 14980368Leckman JF. Phenomenology of tics and natural history of tic disorders. Brain Dev. 2003 Dec;25 Suppl 1:S24-8. doi: 10.1016/s0387-7604(03)90004-0.
- Background: PubMed 7148580Fahn S. The clinical spectrum of motor tics. Adv Neurol. 1982;35:341-4. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 6939410Brill CB, Hartz WH, Mancall EL. Cervical disc herniation in the Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. Ann Neurol. 1981 Mar;9(3):311. doi: 10.1002/ana.410090323. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 8215958Definitions and classification of tic disorders. The Tourette Syndrome Classification Study Group. Arch Neurol. 1993 Oct;50(10):1013-6. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1993.00540100012008.
- BackgroundAmerican Psychiatric Association. DSM-IV-TR Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, IV ed. Washington DC and London: 2000
- Background: PubMed 11673576Kurlan R, McDermott MP, Deeley C, Como PG, Brower C, Eapen S, Andresen EM, Miller B. Prevalence of tics in schoolchildren and association with placement in special education. Neurology. 2001 Oct 23;57(8):1383-8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.8.1383.
- Background: PubMed 18940377Robertson MM. The prevalence and epidemiology of Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. Part 1: the epidemiological and prevalence studies. J Psychosom Res. 2008 Nov;65(5):461-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.03.006. Epub 2008 Oct 2.
- Background: PubMed 17937978Lombroso PJ, Scahill L. Tourette syndrome and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Brain Dev. 2008 Apr;30(4):231-7. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2007.09.001. Epub 2007 Oct 15.
- Background: PubMed 15721825Singer HS. Tourette's syndrome: from behaviour to biology. Lancet Neurol. 2005 Mar;4(3):149-59. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(05)01012-4.
- Background: PubMed 16554257Scahill L, Erenberg G, Berlin CM Jr, Budman C, Coffey BJ, Jankovic J, Kiessling L, King RA, Kurlan R, Lang A, Mink J, Murphy T, Zinner S, Walkup J; Tourette Syndrome Association Medical Advisory Board: Practice Committee. Contemporary assessment and pharmacotherapy of Tourette syndrome. NeuroRx. 2006 Apr;3(2):192-206. doi: 10.1016/j.nurx.2006.01.009.
Related trials for Tourette's Syndrome
Recruiting
Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy in Movement Disorders
Parkinson's Disease
Recruiting
Exploring the Role of Neuroactive Steroids in Tourette Syndrome
Tourette Syndrome in Children
Active, not recruiting
Tourette Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) Target Detection & Suppression
Tourette Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 2
Sertraline vs. Placebo in the Treatment of Anxiety in Children and AdoLescents With NeurodevelopMental Disorders
Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Autism
Recruiting
Integrating Exposure and Response Prevention and Habit Reversal Techniques to Treat a Tourettic Subtype of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (Tourettic OCD)
Obsessive - Compulsive Disorder, Tic Disorder, Chronic Motor or Vocal
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Luigi M Romito, MD, PhD principal investigator
IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milano, Italy
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing STN DBS in people with Tourette's Syndrome and Tourette Syndrome, run by Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (time frame: Three months after stimulation switched ON v pre-operative condition). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02619084, which also lists 47 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2016.