Using Imagery to Maintain Muscle Mass Gains in the QuadricepsPhase 2NCT02621346
Maintaining Muscle Mass Gains
A Phase 2 study testing Imagery, Muscle Maintenance and Bicep Curls in people with Using Imagery to Maintain Muscle Mass Gains in the Quadriceps, run by Western University, Canada at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Mental imagery is effective for improving motor skills as well as increasing muscles strength and size. Strength is also maintained after immobilization of a muscles when engaging in imagery. This may have important implications for rehabilitation settings and for sedentary individuals. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 35 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Using Imagery to Maintain Muscle Mass Gains in the Quadriceps
- What is being tested?
- Imagery, Muscle Maintenance and Bicep Curls
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Jan 2017to Apr 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 35 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Between the ages of 18 of 35. Inclusion criteria is untrained individuals (no history of weight or cardio training) and free of physical disease or orthopedic limitations.
Who cannot join
- Exclusion criteria includes cognitive impairment leading to the inability to image, orthopaedic illness or injury that prevents engaging in leg exercises and pregnant women due to the radiation rom the DEXA scan.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
Exercise and health Psychology Lab
London, Ontario, N6A 3K7
Alison Divine, PhD (Candidate), 519 661 2111, adivine@uwo.ca
About this study
Mental imagery is effective for improving motor skills as well as increasing muscles strength and size. Strength is also maintained after immobilization of a muscles when engaging in imagery. This may have important implications for rehabilitation settings and for sedentary individuals. We may not be able to get people wot exercise but if they can maintain muscles size and strength via imagery this may have beneficial health and functional outcomes.
Read the detailed description
It is well established that imagery improves motor performance and learning. Imagery is defined as "an experiences that mimics real experiences, and involves using a combination of different sensory modalities in the absence of actual perception: (Cumming \& Ramsey, 2009, p.5). The mechanism thought to enhance the effectiveness of imagery is through the theory of functional equivalence (Holmes \& Collins, 2001). This theory proposes that when a person images, they activate similar areas of the brain, which also become active if the individual actually engages in the task. The PETTLEP model (Holmes \& Collins, 2001) is a framework for the application of the theory of functional equivalence. It is proposed that incorporating each PETTLEP elements into the Imagery experience will increase the similar areas of brain activation and enhance imagery's effectiveness. The elements of the PETTLEP model are as following: 1) physical refers to recreating the physical components of the skill; 2) environment, refers to recreating the place where the skill is performed; 3) task, refers to the specificity of the content of the imagery to the skill being imaged 4) Timing refers to the speed at which imagery is completed. Real times is the most effective; 5) Learning, refers to adapting imagery in response to learning; 6) Emotion refers to the inclusion of related emotions in imagery as this lead to a more real-life situation and enhances the effectiveness of imagery; and 7) perspective refers to the viewpoint through which imagery is done (Holmes \& Collins, 2001). With respect to perspective there are three types of views and image can involves. The first is internal perspective, which refers to creating an image of what the individual would see if looking through their eyes. Second is external perspective, which refers to imaging yourself from the outside, as if you were watching yourself in a video. Lastly, is the kinaesthetic perspective, which refers to imaging how the movement feels. Research has shown that for increasing muscles strength and size the internal imagery perspective is more effective than external (Leban et al., 2010; Yoa et al., 2013). Additionally, internal imagery increasing physiological responses, such as hear rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate compared to external imagery (Ranganthen et al., 2004). Research examining the effects of motor imagery on increasing strength has found that imagery is effective. Significant increased in muscles strength have occurred ranging from 10-22% strength increases as a result of imagery (Clark et al., 2014; Leban et al., 2013; Yao et al., 2013). Additionally, research has found effects trending on significant on muscle size (Leban, 2013). Leban and colleagues (2013) trained participants over a total of 12 days, as saw increased in muscles size. Physiological research suggests that the development of muscle mass and size requires 4-8 weeks (American College of Sports Medicine, 2012). As such, given that trending significance was found for the exercise plus imagery group in size of the thigh muscles after a short 12-day training protocol and no difference in size for the exercise only group, this suggests that imagery may affect muscle hypertrophy. Additionally, research has looked at the use of imagery to maintain muscles strength after immobilization. For instance, after immobilization of the index finger, the mental imagery group maintained strength despite muscles atrophy (Yao et al., 1996). Given these findings it is possible that following muscle hypertrophy and strength gains through exercise, imagery may help to attenuate the loss of muscle strength and size in a maintenance phase. This may have importance implications for rehabilitation settings, as well as influences how sedentarianism is approached. For some untrained sedentary individuals, using mental imagery is far easier that exercising. If imagery not only attenuates the loss of strength and muscles size this may help individuals who are not able to exercise maintain their muscles and strength required for functional daily activities. Therefore the purpose of this study is to assess how mental imagery attenuates muscles size and strength over four weeks after an eight-week training program designed to increase muscles hypertrophy and strength. It is hypothesized that the imagery group will maintain their size and strength gains at a similar rate as the maintenance exercise group, whereas the control group is expected to lose muscle gains.
The study consists of two phases. Phase 1 is the exercise phase. Phase 2 is the maintenance phase. The study will be a single blind randomized control trial. PHASE 1: Consenting participants will complete the Par Q health screening, the Godin-Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ; Godin \& Sheppard, 1985) and a demographic questionnaire. Following this, participants will be given a DEXA body scan to assess muscle mass and a predicted 1rep maximum (1RM) strength test on the leg press. The predicted 1 RM is a submaximal strength test used to estimate the maximum amount of weight an individual can move once. Participants will come into the lab 3 times per week and following a 5 minute walking warm up at 40-60% of the predicted heart rate reserve, will complete 2 warm up leg press sets followed by 3 work sets of 8-12 reps with 1 minute rest between sets. Following this participants will complete 3-5 minute cool down. Each session will last approximately 20 minutes. Participants will start at 70% of and predicted 1RM will increase progressively. A 10%increase in load will be applied when the individual can perform the current workload and 1-2 reps over the required number in the third set. Participants will complete 8weeks of leg press exercises. After 8 weeks participants will be given a DEXA scan and a predicted 1 RM test. For those participants that show muscle growth in the leg muscles on the DEXA will move onto phase 2. PHASE 2: participants that move on to phase 2 will be randomized into 1 of 3 groups. This phase will last for 4 weeks. All three groups will continue to come into the lab three times per week for20 minutes per session. The maintenance group will continue to perform the leg press at 1/3rd of final strength assessment. This is the percentage of intensity recommended to maintain muscle mass and strength gains by the American College of Sports Medicine. The imagery group, will sit on the leg press and image completing 3 sets of leg press. The imagery group will be asked to fill out the Movement Imagery Questionnaire -revised as this gives us a measure of imagery ability. The imagery group will be given an imagery script prior to imaging. Weekly manipulation checks will be completed to ensure that participants are imagining what they are supposed to. Control group will come in 3 times per week and complete 3 sets of 8-12 of a bicep curl 1/3 of predicted 1 RM. Once per week imagery and control participants will be hooked up to EMG to see if there is muscle activation during imagery. The EMG will be placed on surface of the skin of the quadriceps muscles. EMG will be on for the duration of the 15 minutes during the executing of imagery leg presses or the control group bicep curl exercises. The EMG is measured in microvolts. Measuring the above parameter will involve connecting the participants to sensors and electrodes that will pick up on muscle tension responses. This process is non-invasive. Sensors are placed on the surface of the skin. Following the 4 weeks participants will be given another DEXA scan and predicted 1 rep max. At the end of PHASE 2 participants will complete a final predicted 1 RM strength assessment as well as a DEXA scan to measure muscles mass. Additionally, all groups will be given an imagery manipulation check to see if the control or maintenance group imaged during PHASE2.
- Being tested
- Imagery, Muscle Maintenance, Bicep Curls
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ImageryBehavioural
Prior to exercising participants will be given an imagery script. Afterwards, participants will imagine completing the leg press.
Muscle MaintenanceBehavioural
Participants complete the leg press exercises at an intensity that promotes muscle maintenance but not muscle growth
Bicep CurlsBehavioural
Control group participants will complete a bicep exercise at a maintenance training intensity.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Imagery Group | Experimental | The imagery group, will sit on the leg press and image completing 3 sets of leg press. The imagery group will be asked to fill out the Movement Imagery Questionnaire -revised as this gives us a measure of imagery ability. The imagery group will be given an imagery script prior to imaging. Weekly manipulation checks will be completed to ensure that participants are imagining what they are supposed to. Receives: Behavioral: Imagery |
| Maintenance Group | Active comparator | The maintenance group will continue to perform the leg press three times per week at 1/3rd of final strength assessment. This is the percentage of intensity recommended to maintain muscle mass and strength gains by the American College of Sports Medicine. Receives: Behavioral: Muscle Maintenance |
| Control Group | Active comparator | Control group will come in 3 times per week for 20 minutes and complete 3 sets of 8-12 of a bicep curl 1/3 of predicted 1 RM Receives: Behavioral: Bicep Curls |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Muslce mass (grams) determined by the DEXA body scan.
Measured: 4 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
Muscle strength
Measured: 4 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2017
- Primary completionApr 2018 (estimated)
- Study completionApr 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Using Imagery to Maintain Muscle Mass Gains in the QuadricepsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Western University, Canada
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Alison Divine, Western University, Canada
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02621346
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HSREB 107286
- Status last verified
- Oct 2016
- First submitted
- 1 Dec 2015
- Last updated
- 1 Nov 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Individual participant data will provided to each participant at the end of the study.
Publications
Clark BC, Mahato NK, Nakazawa M, Law TD, Thomas JS. The power of the mind: the cortex as a critical determinant of muscle strength/weakness. J Neurophysiol. 2014 Dec 15;112(12):3219-26. doi: 10.1152/jn.00386.2014. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
PubMed 25274345Cumming, J., & Ramsey, R. (2009). Imagery interventions in sport. In S.D Mellalieu & S. Hanton (Eds.)., Advances in applied sport psychology: A review (pp.5-36). London: Routledge
Holmes, P. S., & Collins, D. J. (2001). The PETTLEP approach to motor imagery: A functional equivalence model for sport psychologists. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13, 60-83.
Godin G, Shephard RJ. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985 Sep;10(3):141-6.
PubMed 4053261Lebon F, Collet C, Guillot A. Benefits of motor imagery training on muscle strength. J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Jun;24(6):1680-7. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d8e936.
PubMed 20508474Ranganathan VK, Siemionow V, Liu JZ, Sahgal V, Yue GH. From mental power to muscle power--gaining strength by using the mind. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(7):944-56. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.11.018.
PubMed 14998709Yao, G. H., Wilson, S. L., Cole, K.J., Darline, W.G., Tuh, W. T. C. (1996). Imagined muscle contraction training increases voluntary neural drive to muscle. Journal of Pscyhophysiology, 10, 198-208.
Yao WX, Ranganathan VK, Allexandre D, Siemionow V, Yue GH. Kinesthetic imagery training of forceful muscle contractions increases brain signal and muscle strength. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Sep 26;7:561. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00561. eCollection 2013.
PubMed 24133427
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Nov 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Maintaining Muscle Mass Gains
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02621346
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HSREB 107286
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Western University, CanadaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2017
- Primary completion
- Apr 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Apr 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Mental imagery is effective for improving motor skills as well as increasing muscles strength and size. Strength is also maintained after immobilization of a muscles when engaging in imagery. This may have important implications for rehabilitation settings and for sedentary individuals. We may not be able to get people wot exercise but if they can maintain muscles size and strength via imagery this may have beneficial health and functional outcomes.
Detailed description
It is well established that imagery improves motor performance and learning. Imagery is defined as "an experiences that mimics real experiences, and involves using a combination of different sensory modalities in the absence of actual perception: (Cumming \& Ramsey, 2009, p.5). The mechanism thought to enhance the effectiveness of imagery is through the theory of functional equivalence (Holmes \& Collins, 2001). This theory proposes that when a person images, they activate similar areas of the brain, which also become active if the individual actually engages in the task. The PETTLEP model (Holmes \& Collins, 2001) is a framework for the application of the theory of functional equivalence. It is proposed that incorporating each PETTLEP elements into the Imagery experience will increase the similar areas of brain activation and enhance imagery's effectiveness. The elements of the PETTLEP model are as following: 1) physical refers to recreating the physical components of the skill; 2) environment, refers to recreating the place where the skill is performed; 3) task, refers to the specificity of the content of the imagery to the skill being imaged 4) Timing refers to the speed at which imagery is completed. Real times is the most effective; 5) Learning, refers to adapting imagery in response to learning; 6) Emotion refers to the inclusion of related emotions in imagery as this lead to a more real-life situation and enhances the effectiveness of imagery; and 7) perspective refers to the viewpoint through which imagery is done (Holmes \& Collins, 2001). With respect to perspective there are three types of views and image can involves. The first is internal perspective, which refers to creating an image of what the individual would see if looking through their eyes. Second is external perspective, which refers to imaging yourself from the outside, as if you were watching yourself in a video. Lastly, is the kinaesthetic perspective, which refers to imaging how the movement feels. Research has shown that for increasing muscles strength and size the internal imagery perspective is more effective than external (Leban et al., 2010; Yoa et al., 2013). Additionally, internal imagery increasing physiological responses, such as hear rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate compared to external imagery (Ranganthen et al., 2004). Research examining the effects of motor imagery on increasing strength has found that imagery is effective. Significant increased in muscles strength have occurred ranging from 10-22% strength increases as a result of imagery (Clark et al., 2014; Leban et al., 2013; Yao et al., 2013). Additionally, research has found effects trending on significant on muscle size (Leban, 2013). Leban and colleagues (2013) trained participants over a total of 12 days, as saw increased in muscles size. Physiological research suggests that the development of muscle mass and size requires 4-8 weeks (American College of Sports Medicine, 2012). As such, given that trending significance was found for the exercise plus imagery group in size of the thigh muscles after a short 12-day training protocol and no difference in size for the exercise only group, this suggests that imagery may affect muscle hypertrophy. Additionally, research has looked at the use of imagery to maintain muscles strength after immobilization. For instance, after immobilization of the index finger, the mental imagery group maintained strength despite muscles atrophy (Yao et al., 1996). Given these findings it is possible that following muscle hypertrophy and strength gains through exercise, imagery may help to attenuate the loss of muscle strength and size in a maintenance phase. This may have importance implications for rehabilitation settings, as well as influences how sedentarianism is approached. For some untrained sedentary individuals, using mental imagery is far easier that exercising. If imagery not only attenuates the loss of strength and muscles size this may help individuals who are not able to exercise maintain their muscles and strength required for functional daily activities. Therefore the purpose of this study is to assess how mental imagery attenuates muscles size and strength over four weeks after an eight-week training program designed to increase muscles hypertrophy and strength. It is hypothesized that the imagery group will maintain their size and strength gains at a similar rate as the maintenance exercise group, whereas the control group is expected to lose muscle gains.
The study consists of two phases. Phase 1 is the exercise phase. Phase 2 is the maintenance phase. The study will be a single blind randomized control trial. PHASE 1: Consenting participants will complete the Par Q health screening, the Godin-Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ; Godin \& Sheppard, 1985) and a demographic questionnaire. Following this, participants will be given a DEXA body scan to assess muscle mass and a predicted 1rep maximum (1RM) strength test on the leg press. The predicted 1 RM is a submaximal strength test used to estimate the maximum amount of weight an individual can move once. Participants will come into the lab 3 times per week and following a 5 minute walking warm up at 40-60% of the predicted heart rate reserve, will complete 2 warm up leg press sets followed by 3 work sets of 8-12 reps with 1 minute rest between sets. Following this participants will complete 3-5 minute cool down. Each session will last approximately 20 minutes. Participants will start at 70% of and predicted 1RM will increase progressively. A 10%increase in load will be applied when the individual can perform the current workload and 1-2 reps over the required number in the third set. Participants will complete 8weeks of leg press exercises. After 8 weeks participants will be given a DEXA scan and a predicted 1 RM test. For those participants that show muscle growth in the leg muscles on the DEXA will move onto phase 2. PHASE 2: participants that move on to phase 2 will be randomized into 1 of 3 groups. This phase will last for 4 weeks. All three groups will continue to come into the lab three times per week for20 minutes per session. The maintenance group will continue to perform the leg press at 1/3rd of final strength assessment. This is the percentage of intensity recommended to maintain muscle mass and strength gains by the American College of Sports Medicine. The imagery group, will sit on the leg press and image completing 3 sets of leg press. The imagery group will be asked to fill out the Movement Imagery Questionnaire -revised as this gives us a measure of imagery ability. The imagery group will be given an imagery script prior to imaging. Weekly manipulation checks will be completed to ensure that participants are imagining what they are supposed to. Control group will come in 3 times per week and complete 3 sets of 8-12 of a bicep curl 1/3 of predicted 1 RM. Once per week imagery and control participants will be hooked up to EMG to see if there is muscle activation during imagery. The EMG will be placed on surface of the skin of the quadriceps muscles. EMG will be on for the duration of the 15 minutes during the executing of imagery leg presses or the control group bicep curl exercises. The EMG is measured in microvolts. Measuring the above parameter will involve connecting the participants to sensors and electrodes that will pick up on muscle tension responses. This process is non-invasive. Sensors are placed on the surface of the skin. Following the 4 weeks participants will be given another DEXA scan and predicted 1 rep max. At the end of PHASE 2 participants will complete a final predicted 1 RM strength assessment as well as a DEXA scan to measure muscles mass. Additionally, all groups will be given an imagery manipulation check to see if the control or maintenance group imaged during PHASE2.
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Imagery Group | Experimental | Behavioral: ImageryThe imagery group, will sit on the leg press and image completing 3 sets of leg press. The imagery group will be asked to fill out the Movement Imagery Questionnaire -revised as this gives us a measure of imagery ability. The imagery group will be given an imagery script prior to imaging. Weekly manipulation checks will be completed to ensure that participants are imagining what they are supposed to. |
| Maintenance Group | Active comparator | Behavioral: Muscle MaintenanceThe maintenance group will continue to perform the leg press three times per week at 1/3rd of final strength assessment. This is the percentage of intensity recommended to maintain muscle mass and strength gains by the American College of Sports Medicine. |
| Control Group | Active comparator | Behavioral: Bicep CurlsControl group will come in 3 times per week for 20 minutes and complete 3 sets of 8-12 of a bicep curl 1/3 of predicted 1 RM |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 35 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Between the ages of 18 of 35. Inclusion criteria is untrained individuals (no history of weight or cardio training) and free of physical disease or orthopedic limitations.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Exclusion criteria includes cognitive impairment leading to the inability to image, orthopaedic illness or injury that prevents engaging in leg exercises and pregnant women due to the radiation rom the DEXA scan.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ImageryPrior to exercising participants will be given an imagery script. Afterwards, participants will imagine completing the leg press. | Behavioural | Imagery Group |
| Muscle MaintenanceParticipants complete the leg press exercises at an intensity that promotes muscle maintenance but not muscle growth | Behavioural | Maintenance Group |
| Bicep CurlsControl group participants will complete a bicep exercise at a maintenance training intensity. | Behavioural | Control Group |
Primary outcome
Muslce mass (grams) determined by the DEXA body scan.
Time frame: 4 weeks
1 secondary outcome
Muscle strength
Time frame: 4 weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Nov 2016.
- Background: PubMed 25274345Clark BC, Mahato NK, Nakazawa M, Law TD, Thomas JS. The power of the mind: the cortex as a critical determinant of muscle strength/weakness. J Neurophysiol. 2014 Dec 15;112(12):3219-26. doi: 10.1152/jn.00386.2014. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
- BackgroundCumming, J., & Ramsey, R. (2009). Imagery interventions in sport. In S.D Mellalieu & S. Hanton (Eds.)., Advances in applied sport psychology: A review (pp.5-36). London: Routledge
- BackgroundHolmes, P. S., & Collins, D. J. (2001). The PETTLEP approach to motor imagery: A functional equivalence model for sport psychologists. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13, 60-83.
- Background: PubMed 4053261Godin G, Shephard RJ. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985 Sep;10(3):141-6.
- Background: PubMed 20508474Lebon F, Collet C, Guillot A. Benefits of motor imagery training on muscle strength. J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Jun;24(6):1680-7. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d8e936.
- Background: PubMed 14998709Ranganathan VK, Siemionow V, Liu JZ, Sahgal V, Yue GH. From mental power to muscle power--gaining strength by using the mind. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(7):944-56. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.11.018.
- BackgroundYao, G. H., Wilson, S. L., Cole, K.J., Darline, W.G., Tuh, W. T. C. (1996). Imagined muscle contraction training increases voluntary neural drive to muscle. Journal of Pscyhophysiology, 10, 198-208.
- Background: PubMed 24133427Yao WX, Ranganathan VK, Allexandre D, Siemionow V, Yue GH. Kinesthetic imagery training of forceful muscle contractions increases brain signal and muscle strength. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Sep 26;7:561. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00561. eCollection 2013.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Individual participant data will provided to each participant at the end of the study.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Imagery, Muscle Maintenance and Bicep Curls in people with Using Imagery to Maintain Muscle Mass Gains in the Quadriceps, run by Western University, Canada at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Nov 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Muslce mass (grams) determined by the DEXA body scan. (time frame: 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02621346, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Nov 2016; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 29 Oct 2026.