HysterectomyNCT02621710
Goal Achievement and Patient Satisfaction in Benign Hysterectomy
An observational study of Hysterectomy and Goal Achievement, run by University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study evaluates patient goal achievement and satisfaction in benign hysterectomy. Patient's will state their goals prior to undergoing benign hysterectomy, and will receive a follow-up questionnaire 3 months post-operatively evaluating their perception of goal achievement and overall satisfaction. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Hysterectomy, Goal Achievement, Patient Satisfaction
- What is being tested?
- Questionnaire 3 months post-operatively
- How many people
- 57 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Dec 2015to 1 Mar 2017
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients undergoing benign hysterectomy for benign indications in a scheduled manner
Who may be able to join
- Patient undergoing hysterectomy for benign indication
- Age 18 or greater
- English speaking
- Access to communication via telephone
Who cannot join
- Patient undergoing hysterectomy for malignant or pre-malignant condition
- Non-english speaking patient
- Patient without telephone access
- Patient undergoing emergent or unplanned hysterectomy
- Vulnerable populations
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
This study evaluates patient goal achievement and satisfaction in benign hysterectomy. Patient's will state their goals prior to undergoing benign hysterectomy, and will receive a follow-up questionnaire 3 months post-operatively evaluating their perception of goal achievement and overall satisfaction. Goal achievement and satisfaction will be evaluated for association with surgical indication, surgical approach (minimally invasive vs abdominal surgery), and demographic information.
- Being tested
- Questionnaire 3 months post-operatively
- Medical subject headings
- Patient Satisfaction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Questionnaire 3 months post-operativelyOther
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Minimally invasive hysterectomy | Patients undergoing scheduled minimally invasive hysterectomy (vaginal, laparoscopic, robotic) for benign condition Receives: Other: Questionnaire 3 months post-operatively | |
| Abdominal hysterectomy | Patients undergoing scheduled abdominal hysterectomy for benign condition Receives: Other: Questionnaire 3 months post-operatively |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Goal achievement score of 4 or 5
Patients will state their goals prior to surgery, then at the three months post-operatively will rank if their goals were met on a 1-5 likert scale (1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=neutral, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree). Goals are considered achieved with a likert score of 4 or 5.
Measured: 3 months post-operatively
Secondary outcomes (1)
Percent of patient satisfaction
At three months post-operatively, patients will state how satisfied they are with their hysterectomy experience, from 0 to 100%.
Measured: 3 months post-operatively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2015
- Primary completion1 Mar 2017
- Study completion1 Mar 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HysterectomyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospitals Cleveland Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 57 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Graham Chapman, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
- Investigators
- Sangeeta Mahajan, MD, Principal investigator, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02621710
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 053161
- Status last verified
- Oct 2017
- First submitted
- 28 Nov 2015
- Last updated
- 31 Oct 2017
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Pilzek AL, Raker CA, Sung VW. Are patients' personal goals achieved after pelvic reconstructive surgery? Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Mar;25(3):347-50. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2222-8. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
PubMed 24045936Mamik MM, Rogers RG, Qualls CR, Komesu YM. Goal attainment after treatment in patients with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;209(5):488.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.06.011. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
PubMed 23770473Hullfish KL, Bovbjerg VE, Gibson J, Steers WD. Patient-centered goals for pelvic floor dysfunction surgery: what is success, and is it achieved? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jul;187(1):88-92. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.124838.
PubMed 12114893Elkadry EA, Kenton KS, FitzGerald MP, Shott S, Brubaker L. Patient-selected goals: a new perspective on surgical outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Dec;189(6):1551-7; discussion 1557-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(03)00932-3.
PubMed 14710061Mahajan ST, Elkadry EA, Kenton KS, Shott S, Brubaker L. Patient-centered surgical outcomes: the impact of goal achievement and urge incontinence on patient satisfaction one year after surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Mar;194(3):722-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.043.
PubMed 16522404Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R, van Voorst S, Mol BW, Kluivers KB. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8;(3):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub4.
PubMed 19588344ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444: choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;114(5):1156-1158. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c33c72.
PubMed 20168127Martino MA, Berger EA, McFetridge JT, Shubella J, Gosciniak G, Wejkszner T, Kainz GF, Patriarco J, Thomas MB, Boulay R. A comparison of quality outcome measures in patients having a hysterectomy for benign disease: robotic vs. non-robotic approaches. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):389-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.10.008. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
PubMed 24513969Warren L, Ladapo JA, Borah BJ, Gunnarsson CL. Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):581-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.06.018.
PubMed 19835801Wright KN, Jonsdottir GM, Jorgensen S, Shah N, Einarsson JI. Costs and outcomes of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies. JSLS. 2012 Oct-Dec;16(4):519-24. doi: 10.4293/108680812X13462882736736.
PubMed 23484557Pitter MC, Simmonds C, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Hubert HB. The impact of different surgical modalities for hysterectomy on satisfaction and patient reported outcomes. Interact J Med Res. 2014 Jul 17;3(3):e11. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.3160.
PubMed 25048103
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Oct 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Goal Achievement and Patient Satisfaction in Benign Hysterectomy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02621710
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 053161
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 57 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2015
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Mar 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluates patient goal achievement and satisfaction in benign hysterectomy. Patient's will state their goals prior to undergoing benign hysterectomy, and will receive a follow-up questionnaire 3 months post-operatively evaluating their perception of goal achievement and overall satisfaction. Goal achievement and satisfaction will be evaluated for association with surgical indication, surgical approach (minimally invasive vs abdominal surgery), and demographic information.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Minimally invasive hysterectomy | – | Other: Questionnaire 3 months post-operativelyPatients undergoing scheduled minimally invasive hysterectomy (vaginal, laparoscopic, robotic) for benign condition |
| Abdominal hysterectomy | – | Other: Questionnaire 3 months post-operativelyPatients undergoing scheduled abdominal hysterectomy for benign condition |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients undergoing benign hysterectomy for benign indications in a scheduled manner
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patient undergoing hysterectomy for benign indication
- Age 18 or greater
- English speaking
- Access to communication via telephone
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patient undergoing hysterectomy for malignant or pre-malignant condition
- Non-english speaking patient
- Patient without telephone access
- Patient undergoing emergent or unplanned hysterectomy
- Vulnerable populations
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Questionnaire 3 months post-operatively | Other | Abdominal hysterectomy, Minimally invasive hysterectomy |
Primary outcome
Goal achievement score of 4 or 5
Time frame: 3 months post-operatively
Patients will state their goals prior to surgery, then at the three months post-operatively will rank if their goals were met on a 1-5 likert scale (1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=neutral, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree). Goals are considered achieved with a likert score of 4 or 5.
1 secondary outcome
Percent of patient satisfaction
Time frame: 3 months post-operatively
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Oct 2017.
- Background: PubMed 24045936Pilzek AL, Raker CA, Sung VW. Are patients' personal goals achieved after pelvic reconstructive surgery? Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Mar;25(3):347-50. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2222-8. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
- Background: PubMed 23770473Mamik MM, Rogers RG, Qualls CR, Komesu YM. Goal attainment after treatment in patients with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;209(5):488.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.06.011. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
- Background: PubMed 12114893Hullfish KL, Bovbjerg VE, Gibson J, Steers WD. Patient-centered goals for pelvic floor dysfunction surgery: what is success, and is it achieved? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jul;187(1):88-92. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.124838.
- Background: PubMed 14710061Elkadry EA, Kenton KS, FitzGerald MP, Shott S, Brubaker L. Patient-selected goals: a new perspective on surgical outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Dec;189(6):1551-7; discussion 1557-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(03)00932-3.
- Background: PubMed 16522404Mahajan ST, Elkadry EA, Kenton KS, Shott S, Brubaker L. Patient-centered surgical outcomes: the impact of goal achievement and urge incontinence on patient satisfaction one year after surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Mar;194(3):722-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.043.
- Background: PubMed 19588344Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R, van Voorst S, Mol BW, Kluivers KB. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8;(3):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub4.
- Background: PubMed 20168127ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444: choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;114(5):1156-1158. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c33c72.
- Background: PubMed 24513969Martino MA, Berger EA, McFetridge JT, Shubella J, Gosciniak G, Wejkszner T, Kainz GF, Patriarco J, Thomas MB, Boulay R. A comparison of quality outcome measures in patients having a hysterectomy for benign disease: robotic vs. non-robotic approaches. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):389-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.10.008. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
- Background: PubMed 19835801Warren L, Ladapo JA, Borah BJ, Gunnarsson CL. Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):581-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.06.018.
- Background: PubMed 23484557Wright KN, Jonsdottir GM, Jorgensen S, Shah N, Einarsson JI. Costs and outcomes of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies. JSLS. 2012 Oct-Dec;16(4):519-24. doi: 10.4293/108680812X13462882736736.
- Background: PubMed 25048103Pitter MC, Simmonds C, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Hubert HB. The impact of different surgical modalities for hysterectomy on satisfaction and patient reported outcomes. Interact J Med Res. 2014 Jul 17;3(3):e11. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.3160.
Related trials for Hysterectomy
Recruiting
Implementation of a Pain Management Plan in Major Open Abdominal Surgeries.
Abdomen Cancer, Pancreas Adenocarcinoma (MSI-H)
Not yet recruiting
COMPARISON OF THE POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIC EFFECTS OF ULTRASOUND-GUIDED QUADRO-ILIAC PLANE AND TRANSVERSUS ABDOMINIS PLANE BLOCKS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING TOTAL LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY
Postoperative Pain Following Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Intravenous Ibuprofen Postoperative Analgesia After Abdominal Hysterectomy
Post Operative Analgesia
RecruitingObservational study
Predictors of Success and Failure of v-NOTES Hysterectomy for Large and Very Large Uteri
Uterine Fibroids, Hysterectomy
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Assessment - HominisTM Surgical System
Hysterectomy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sangeeta Mahajan, MD principal investigator
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Hysterectomy and Goal Achievement, run by University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Oct 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Goal achievement score of 4 or 5 (time frame: 3 months post-operatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02621710, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Oct 2017.