AzTrials
AzTrials

Neoplasm MetastasisPhase 1/2BLENDNCT02622841

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Followed by Surgical Stabilization for Patients With Unstable Spinal Metastases

A Phase 1/2 study testing BLEND in people with Neoplasm Metastasis, run by UMC Utrecht at 1 site in Netherlands.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and safety of combining stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and pedicle screw fixation in a 48-hour window for the treatment of painful unstable metastases of the thoracic and/or lumbar spine. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Neoplasm Metastasis
What is being tested?
BLEND
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
13 participants
Where
1 siteNetherlands
Study dates
Jun 2015to Apr 2017
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Painful metastases from solid tumors in the thoracic or lumbar spine needing surgical stabilization
  • Histologic proof of malignancy
  • Radiographic evidence of spinal metastases
  • Karnofsky performance status ≤ 50
  • Written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Multiple spinal metastases necessitating bridging more than five vertebral levels during surgery
  • Previous surgery or radiotherapy to index lesion
  • stereotactic body radiotherapy cannot be delivered (Bilsky score 2 and 3)
  • Neurological deficits (ASIA C, B or A)
  • Partial neurological deficits (ASIA D) with rapid progression (hours to days)
  • Inability to lie flat on table for stereotactic body radiotherapy
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Non-ambulatory patients
  • Patient in hospice or with < 3 months life expectancy
  • Medically inoperable or patient refused surgery

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Netherlands1 site
  • University Medical Center Utrecht

    Utrecht, 3584 CX

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Followed by Surgical Stabilization for Patients With Unstable Spinal Metastases: First-in-Man Study According to the IDEAL Recommendations

The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and safety of combining stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and pedicle screw fixation in a 48-hour window for the treatment of painful unstable metastases of the thoracic and/or lumbar spine.

Read the detailed description

Rationale: Sixty-five percent of cancer patients with terminal illness have bone metastases, with debilitating pain as devastating consequence. The spine is the most common location for bone metastases. Spinal cord compression is present in 10% of patients with vertebral metastases and aggravates pain and performance status even further. Standard treatment of unstable vertebral metastases consists of stabilizing surgery, followed by external beam radiotherapy (8 Gy) after two weeks. Although this approach is effective in 60-70% of patients, it is has several downsides. Firstly, because of the two weeks interval between surgery and external beam radiotherapy, necessary for sufficient wound healing, it takes a long time before radiotherapy induced pain relief is achieved. Scatter artifacts on planning computed tomography images caused by surgical implants prohibit high-resolution imaging and accurate targeting of the lesion. Multiple hospital visits (+/- 10) are needed for administration of external beam irradiation, and in about 30-40% of patients no adequate pain response is achieved. An alternative treatment strategy, which would lead to faster pain relief in a higher proportion of patients with less hospital visits, would be highly desirable from the patient's perspective.

Objective: To assess the feasibility and safety of combining stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and pedicle screw fixation in a 48-hour window for the treatment of painful unstable metastases of the thoracic and/or lumbar spine.

Study design: Prospective case series (13), first in man study, Phase I and II a study according to the IDEAL recommendations

Study population: All patients, male and female, with impending spinal stability requiring radiation therapy and surgical intervention at the University Medical Center Utrecht

Main study parameters/endpoints: The main outcome of this study is safety of the combined procedure, defined as grade 3 or higher treatment-induced toxicity according to common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTC-AE) 4.0 as a result of the procedure within 60 days after the surgery.

Being tested
BLEND
Keywords
First in man, Spinal metastases, Stereotactic bodyradiotherapy, Palliative care, Safety, Surgical stabilisation
Medical subject headings
Neoplasm Metastasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BLENDProcedure or surgery

    Stereotactic bodyradiotherapy and surgical stabilization within 48 hours.

Study groups in NCT02622841
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
BLENDExperimentalCombination of stereotactic bodyradiotherapy and surgical stabilization within 48 hours for the treatment of unstable spinal metastases.
Receives: Procedure: BLEND

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Occurrence of adverse events

    Occurrence of adverse events grade 3/4 according to the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) 4.0

    Measured: first 90 days post treatment

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Pain response

    Measurement of pain response to combined therapy according to consensus guidelines

    Measured: first 90 days post treatment

  2. Duration of pain relief

    Measurement of duration of pain relief

    Measured: first 90 days post treatment

  3. Rapidity of pain relief

    Measurement of rapidity of pain relief

    Measured: first 90 days post treatment

  4. Hospital stay

    Measurement of length of hospital stay

    Measured: first 90 days post treatment

  5. Early mortality

    Measurement of 30 days mortality

    Measured: First 30 days post treatment

  6. Neurological status

    Measurement of neurological deterioration

    Measured: First 90 days post treatment

  7. Quality of life

    Evaluation of quality of life

    Measured: first 90 days post treatment

  8. Survival

    Overall survival

    Measured: Time from inclusion until date of death from any cause assessed up to 100 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Dec 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2015
  3. Primary completionApr 2017
  4. Study completionApr 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
13 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02622841
Sponsor's protocol ID
NL51405.041.15
Acronym
BLEND
Status last verified
May 2017
First submitted
17 Sep 2015
Last updated
8 May 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing BLEND in people with Neoplasm Metastasis, run by UMC Utrecht at 1 site in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Occurrence of adverse events (time frame: first 90 days post treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 May 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in