AppendicitisPhase 1/2NALANCT02624089
Nebulized Analgesia for Laparoscopic Appendectomy Trial
A Phase 1/2 study testing Ropivacaine and Normal saline in people with Appendicitis, run by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The objective of this study is to assess whether the administration of nebulized intra-peritoneal ropivacaine at the onset of surgery, compared with nebulized saline, reduces morphine consumption after laparoscopic appendectomy surgery in children and adolescents. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 7 to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Appendicitis
- What is being tested?
- Ropivacaine and Normal saline
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Jan 2016to Jul 2017
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 7 to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Children and adolescents aged 7-18 years old
- ASA Score I (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification) [Appendix 1]: a normal healthy patient.
- ASA Score II (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification): A patient with mild systemic disease
- Patients scheduled for laparoscopic appendectomy surgery
- Uncomplicated appendicitis
- Hemodynamically stable patient
Show all 10Show fewer
- No evidence of appendiceal perforation based on preoperative clinical and imaging assessment
- Diagnosed to have simple acute appendicitis by intraoperative laparoscopy
- Patients who have provided a written informed assent
- Caregivers who have provided a written informed consent
Who cannot join
- ASA Score III (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification): A patient with severe systemic disease
- ASA Score IV (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification): A patient with severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life
- ASA Score V (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification): A moribund patient who is not expected to survive without the operation
- Hemodynamically unstable patient
- Evidence of appendiceal perforation on based on preoperative clinical and imaging assessment
- Perforated or gangrenous appendicitis diagnosed during laparoscopic surgery
Show all 18Show fewer
- Postoperative admission in an intensive care unit with sedation or ventilatory assistance
- Cognitive impairment or mental retardation
- Progressive degenerative diseases of the CNS
- Seizures or chronic therapy with antiepileptic drugs
- Severe hepatic or renal impairment
- Allergy to one of the specific drugs under study
- Alcohol or drug addiction
- Failure to successfully undergo a laparoscopic appendectomy
- A significant communication problem including language barrier, precluding phone follow up
- Participation in a concomitant research study
- Inability to assure complete follow up
- Failure to acquire informed consent and assent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Montreal Children's Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3J1
Robert Baird, MDCM MSc, 514 412 4400 ext. 24438, robert.baird@mcgill.ca
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Effect of Intraperitoneal Nebulized Ropivacaine on Morphine Consumption After Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children. A Prospective, Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial
The objective of this study is to assess whether the administration of nebulized intra-peritoneal ropivacaine at the onset of surgery, compared with nebulized saline, reduces morphine consumption after laparoscopic appendectomy surgery in children and adolescents.
Read the detailed description
The laparoscopic approach to pediatric appendectomy is gaining in popularity and has been demonstrated to reduce complications and improve resource utilization. The procedure has a documented association with high postoperative pain intensity, and is associated with substantial pain (pain scores >4 for >60% of the time) in 33% of patients. This is due to surgical manipulation, but also to the intraperitoneal insufflation of carbon dioxide required during laparoscopy which results in in peritoneal stretching, diaphragmatic irritation, changes in intra-abdominal pH as well as retention of insufflation gas in the abdominal cavity after surgery.
Opioid analgesics, especially morphine, are the most common pharmacological option for treating postoperative pain in pediatric patients. Although morphine is generally considered safe to use in pediatric patients, physicians and caregivers often hesitate to prescribe or administer opioids because of the perceived risk of addiction or undesirable side effects. Efforts to mitigate the use of opioids as systemic analgesia after surgery appears warranted. The topical administration of analgesics/anesthetics via the peritoneum is biologically advantageous as intra-abdominal gas insufflation and the resultant increased intra-abdominal pressure generates peritoneal inflammation and neuronal rupture with a linear relationship between abdominal compliance during the procedure and the severity of postoperative pain.
Intraperitoneal nebulization of local a anesthetic agent is a relatively novel approach to pain management after laparoscopy. Intraperitoneal nebulization of local anesthetic allows a uniform dispersion of the agent throughout the peritoneum and combines the analgesic benefits of gas conditioning and local anesthetic instillation. Microvibration-based aerosol humidification devices (i.e. cold nebulization) deliver significant amounts of local anesthetics in the abdominal cavity. Animal studies have confirmed the safety and bioavailability of nebulized ropivicaine in the abdominal cavity. The pharmacokinetics of nebulized ropivacaine 3 mg/kg is similar to that of instilled ropivacaine and maximal ropivacaine concentrations have been found to lie well within safe ranges. Human studies have confirmed favorable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of nebulized ropivacaine. Peak concentration is attained between 10 and 30 minutes following the end of aerosolized ropivacaine delivery. Aerosolized intraperitoneal local anesthetic is feasible, with ropivacaine concentrations remaining within safe levels.
In previous randomized controlled trials in adults, nebulization of ropivacaine 30 mg with the Aeroneb Pro system either before or after laparoscopic cholecystectomy reduces postoperative pain (effect size - 33% to - 50%) as well as completely prevents shoulder pain compared with nebulization of saline. Patients receiving ropivacaine nebulization consumed significantly less morphine than those in the control group (effects size 40% to -56%). Patients receiving ropivacaine nebulization mobilized quicker than those receiving placebo with a 33% reduction on unassisted walking time after surgery. The duration of analgesia after both pre- and postoperative nebulization (up to 48 hours) was significantly longer than the expected duration of ropivacaine, based on its mechanism of action. No adverse events were reported during the conduct of these trials. Ropivicaine nebulization has also been evaluated in the context of gynecological surgery; patients receiving Ropivacaine 30 mg before or after surgical stimulation reported significantly less postoperative pain (-50%) and consumed significant less morphine (-40%) and walked without assistance than those receiving ropivacaine instillation during the first 24 hours after surgery. Furthermore, the administration of intraperitoneal aerosolized bupivacaine just prior to incising the peri-renal fascia appears to be a simple, effective and low-cost method to reduce postoperative pain in children undergoing laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children.
Given the consistently safe and favorable results documented with adult patients, the working study hypothesis is that the intra-abdominal administration of nebulized ropivacaine immediately before the onset of surgery will reduce post-operative pain and morphine consumption after laparoscopic appendectomy in children and adolescents.
- Conditions
- Appendicitis
- Being tested
- Ropivacaine, Normal saline
- Medical subject headings
- Appendicitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RopivacaineDrug
Also called Naropin
Ropivicaine will be administered via in-line nebulization using the Aeroneb Pro™ system
Normal salineDrug
Also called 0.9% saline
Normal saline will be administered via in-line nebulization using the Aeroneb Pro™ system
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ropivacaine Group | Experimental | This group will receive nebulized ropivacaine 0.5% based on ideal body weight at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg with a maximum total dose of 30 mg. This will be administered once at the onset of pneuomoperitoneum during appendectomy. Receives: Drug: Ropivacaine |
| Placebo group | Placebo comparator | This group will receive placebo (normal saline) based on ideal body weight at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg with a maximum total dose of 30 mg. This will be administered at the onset of pneuomoperitoneum during appendectomy. Receives: Drug: Normal saline |
| Non-enrolled group | No intervention | This group will not receive either intervention (ropivicaine) or placebo (normal saline), but will have primary and secondary endpoints evaluated. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Post-operative morphine consumption
The total dose of Morphine (in mg/kg) and the route of administration received after surgery will be recorded. The oral morphine dose will be converted as 1mg IV= 2mg PO.
Measured: During hospital admission (24-48 hours)
Secondary outcomes (5)
Post-operative Pain
This will be serially evaluated using a Visual Analog Score
Measured: During hospital admission (24-48 hours)
Time to unassisted walking
Measured: During hospital admission (24-48 hours)
In-hospital length of stay
Measured: During hospital admission (24-48 hours)
Postoperative recovery quality
This will be evaluated via a standardized telephone questionnaire
Measured: Two weeks after hospital discharge
Surgeon satisfaction
this will be evaluated via a questionnaire
Measured: Immediately after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2016
- Primary completionJun 2017 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AppendicitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Montreal Children's Hospital of the MUHC
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Robert Baird, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
- Investigators
- Robert Baird, MDCM MSc, Principal investigator, Assistant Professor of Pediatric Surgery
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02624089
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 14-120-PED
- Acronym
- NALA
- Status last verified
- Mar 2016
- First submitted
- 3 Dec 2015
- Last updated
- 22 Mar 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Baird R, Ingelmo P, Wei A, Meghani Y, Perez EV, Pelletier H, Auer G, Mujallid R, Emil S, Laberge JM, Puligandla P, Shaw K, Poenaru D. Nebulized analgesia during laparoscopic appendectomy (NALA): A randomized triple-blind placebo controlled trial. J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Jan;54(1):33-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.029. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
PubMed 30366723
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Mar 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Effect of Intraperitoneal Nebulized Ropivacaine on Morphine Consumption After Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children. A Prospective, Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02624089
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NALA / 14-120-PED
- Conditions
- Appendicitis
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health CentreUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Montreal Children's Hospital of the MUHC
- Study start
- Jan 2016
- Primary completion
- Jun 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this study is to assess whether the administration of nebulized intra-peritoneal ropivacaine at the onset of surgery, compared with nebulized saline, reduces morphine consumption after laparoscopic appendectomy surgery in children and adolescents.
Detailed description
The laparoscopic approach to pediatric appendectomy is gaining in popularity and has been demonstrated to reduce complications and improve resource utilization. The procedure has a documented association with high postoperative pain intensity, and is associated with substantial pain (pain scores >4 for >60% of the time) in 33% of patients. This is due to surgical manipulation, but also to the intraperitoneal insufflation of carbon dioxide required during laparoscopy which results in in peritoneal stretching, diaphragmatic irritation, changes in intra-abdominal pH as well as retention of insufflation gas in the abdominal cavity after surgery.
Opioid analgesics, especially morphine, are the most common pharmacological option for treating postoperative pain in pediatric patients. Although morphine is generally considered safe to use in pediatric patients, physicians and caregivers often hesitate to prescribe or administer opioids because of the perceived risk of addiction or undesirable side effects. Efforts to mitigate the use of opioids as systemic analgesia after surgery appears warranted. The topical administration of analgesics/anesthetics via the peritoneum is biologically advantageous as intra-abdominal gas insufflation and the resultant increased intra-abdominal pressure generates peritoneal inflammation and neuronal rupture with a linear relationship between abdominal compliance during the procedure and the severity of postoperative pain.
Intraperitoneal nebulization of local a anesthetic agent is a relatively novel approach to pain management after laparoscopy. Intraperitoneal nebulization of local anesthetic allows a uniform dispersion of the agent throughout the peritoneum and combines the analgesic benefits of gas conditioning and local anesthetic instillation. Microvibration-based aerosol humidification devices (i.e. cold nebulization) deliver significant amounts of local anesthetics in the abdominal cavity. Animal studies have confirmed the safety and bioavailability of nebulized ropivicaine in the abdominal cavity. The pharmacokinetics of nebulized ropivacaine 3 mg/kg is similar to that of instilled ropivacaine and maximal ropivacaine concentrations have been found to lie well within safe ranges. Human studies have confirmed favorable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of nebulized ropivacaine. Peak concentration is attained between 10 and 30 minutes following the end of aerosolized ropivacaine delivery. Aerosolized intraperitoneal local anesthetic is feasible, with ropivacaine concentrations remaining within safe levels.
In previous randomized controlled trials in adults, nebulization of ropivacaine 30 mg with the Aeroneb Pro system either before or after laparoscopic cholecystectomy reduces postoperative pain (effect size - 33% to - 50%) as well as completely prevents shoulder pain compared with nebulization of saline. Patients receiving ropivacaine nebulization consumed significantly less morphine than those in the control group (effects size 40% to -56%). Patients receiving ropivacaine nebulization mobilized quicker than those receiving placebo with a 33% reduction on unassisted walking time after surgery. The duration of analgesia after both pre- and postoperative nebulization (up to 48 hours) was significantly longer than the expected duration of ropivacaine, based on its mechanism of action. No adverse events were reported during the conduct of these trials. Ropivicaine nebulization has also been evaluated in the context of gynecological surgery; patients receiving Ropivacaine 30 mg before or after surgical stimulation reported significantly less postoperative pain (-50%) and consumed significant less morphine (-40%) and walked without assistance than those receiving ropivacaine instillation during the first 24 hours after surgery. Furthermore, the administration of intraperitoneal aerosolized bupivacaine just prior to incising the peri-renal fascia appears to be a simple, effective and low-cost method to reduce postoperative pain in children undergoing laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children.
Given the consistently safe and favorable results documented with adult patients, the working study hypothesis is that the intra-abdominal administration of nebulized ropivacaine immediately before the onset of surgery will reduce post-operative pain and morphine consumption after laparoscopic appendectomy in children and adolescents.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ropivacaine Group | Experimental | Drug: RopivacaineThis group will receive nebulized ropivacaine 0.5% based on ideal body weight at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg with a maximum total dose of 30 mg. This will be administered once at the onset of pneuomoperitoneum during appendectomy. |
| Placebo group | Placebo comparator | Drug: Normal salineThis group will receive placebo (normal saline) based on ideal body weight at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg with a maximum total dose of 30 mg. This will be administered at the onset of pneuomoperitoneum during appendectomy. |
| Non-enrolled group | No intervention | –This group will not receive either intervention (ropivicaine) or placebo (normal saline), but will have primary and secondary endpoints evaluated. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 7 to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Children and adolescents aged 7-18 years old
- ASA Score I (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification) [Appendix 1]: a normal healthy patient.
- ASA Score II (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification): A patient with mild systemic disease
- Patients scheduled for laparoscopic appendectomy surgery
- Uncomplicated appendicitis
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- ASA Score III (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification): A patient with severe systemic disease
- ASA Score IV (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification): A patient with severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life
- ASA Score V (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification): A moribund patient who is not expected to survive without the operation
- Hemodynamically unstable patient
- Evidence of appendiceal perforation on based on preoperative clinical and imaging assessment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RopivacaineAlso: NaropinRopivicaine will be administered via in-line nebulization using the Aeroneb Pro™ system | Drug | Ropivacaine Group |
| Normal salineAlso: 0.9% salineNormal saline will be administered via in-line nebulization using the Aeroneb Pro™ system | Drug | Placebo group |
Primary outcome
Post-operative morphine consumption
Time frame: During hospital admission (24-48 hours)
The total dose of Morphine (in mg/kg) and the route of administration received after surgery will be recorded. The oral morphine dose will be converted as 1mg IV= 2mg PO.
5 secondary outcomes
Post-operative Pain
Time frame: During hospital admission (24-48 hours)
Time to unassisted walking
Time frame: During hospital admission (24-48 hours)
In-hospital length of stay
Time frame: During hospital admission (24-48 hours)
Postoperative recovery quality
Time frame: Two weeks after hospital discharge
Surgeon satisfaction
Time frame: Immediately after surgery
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Mar 2016.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30366723Baird R, Ingelmo P, Wei A, Meghani Y, Perez EV, Pelletier H, Auer G, Mujallid R, Emil S, Laberge JM, Puligandla P, Shaw K, Poenaru D. Nebulized analgesia during laparoscopic appendectomy (NALA): A randomized triple-blind placebo controlled trial. J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Jan;54(1):33-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.029. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Appendicitis
RecruitingObservational study
Prospective Comparison of Pro-Adrenomedullin, C-Reactive Protein, and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio for Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis
Acute Appendicitis
Active, not recruiting
PAINED: Project Addressing INequities in the Emergency Department
Pain, Appendicitis
Not yet recruiting
Comparative Study Between Laparoscopic and Open Appendectomy of Complicated Appendicitis
Appendicitis, Perforated Appendicitis
Recruiting
Feasibility and Safety of a Pediatric ERAS Protocol for Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Appendectomy, Laparoscopic, Acute Appendicitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Piperacillin/Tazobactam Versus Ceftriaxone and Metronidazole for Children With Perforated Appendicitis
Appendicitis Perforated, Appendectomy, Laparoscopic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Robert Baird, MDCM MSc principal investigator
Assistant Professor of Pediatric Surgery
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Ropivacaine and Normal saline in people with Appendicitis, run by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Mar 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Robert Baird, MDCM MSc (514 412 4400 ext. 24438, robert.baird@mcgill.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Post-operative morphine consumption (time frame: During hospital admission (24-48 hours)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02624089, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Mar 2016.