AzTrials
AzTrials

AppendicitisPhase 1/2NALANCT02624089

Nebulized Analgesia for Laparoscopic Appendectomy Trial

A Phase 1/2 study testing Ropivacaine and Normal saline in people with Appendicitis, run by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre at 1 site in Canada.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this study is to assess whether the administration of nebulized intra-peritoneal ropivacaine at the onset of surgery, compared with nebulized saline, reduces morphine consumption after laparoscopic appendectomy surgery in children and adolescents. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 7 to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Appendicitis
What is being tested?
Ropivacaine and Normal saline
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Jan 2016to Jul 2017
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 7 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Children and adolescents aged 7-18 years old
  • ASA Score I (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification) [Appendix 1]: a normal healthy patient.
  • ASA Score II (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification): A patient with mild systemic disease
  • Patients scheduled for laparoscopic appendectomy surgery
  • Uncomplicated appendicitis
  • Hemodynamically stable patient
Show all 10Show fewer
  • No evidence of appendiceal perforation based on preoperative clinical and imaging assessment
  • Diagnosed to have simple acute appendicitis by intraoperative laparoscopy
  • Patients who have provided a written informed assent
  • Caregivers who have provided a written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • ASA Score III (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification): A patient with severe systemic disease
  • ASA Score IV (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification): A patient with severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life
  • ASA Score V (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification): A moribund patient who is not expected to survive without the operation
  • Hemodynamically unstable patient
  • Evidence of appendiceal perforation on based on preoperative clinical and imaging assessment
  • Perforated or gangrenous appendicitis diagnosed during laparoscopic surgery
Show all 18Show fewer
  • Postoperative admission in an intensive care unit with sedation or ventilatory assistance
  • Cognitive impairment or mental retardation
  • Progressive degenerative diseases of the CNS
  • Seizures or chronic therapy with antiepileptic drugs
  • Severe hepatic or renal impairment
  • Allergy to one of the specific drugs under study
  • Alcohol or drug addiction
  • Failure to successfully undergo a laparoscopic appendectomy
  • A significant communication problem including language barrier, precluding phone follow up
  • Participation in a concomitant research study
  • Inability to assure complete follow up
  • Failure to acquire informed consent and assent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Montreal Children's Hospital

    Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3J1

    Robert Baird, MDCM MSc, 514 412 4400 ext. 24438, robert.baird@mcgill.ca

    Recruiting

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of the Effect of Intraperitoneal Nebulized Ropivacaine on Morphine Consumption After Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children. A Prospective, Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial

The objective of this study is to assess whether the administration of nebulized intra-peritoneal ropivacaine at the onset of surgery, compared with nebulized saline, reduces morphine consumption after laparoscopic appendectomy surgery in children and adolescents.

Read the detailed description

The laparoscopic approach to pediatric appendectomy is gaining in popularity and has been demonstrated to reduce complications and improve resource utilization. The procedure has a documented association with high postoperative pain intensity, and is associated with substantial pain (pain scores >4 for >60% of the time) in 33% of patients. This is due to surgical manipulation, but also to the intraperitoneal insufflation of carbon dioxide required during laparoscopy which results in in peritoneal stretching, diaphragmatic irritation, changes in intra-abdominal pH as well as retention of insufflation gas in the abdominal cavity after surgery.

Opioid analgesics, especially morphine, are the most common pharmacological option for treating postoperative pain in pediatric patients. Although morphine is generally considered safe to use in pediatric patients, physicians and caregivers often hesitate to prescribe or administer opioids because of the perceived risk of addiction or undesirable side effects. Efforts to mitigate the use of opioids as systemic analgesia after surgery appears warranted. The topical administration of analgesics/anesthetics via the peritoneum is biologically advantageous as intra-abdominal gas insufflation and the resultant increased intra-abdominal pressure generates peritoneal inflammation and neuronal rupture with a linear relationship between abdominal compliance during the procedure and the severity of postoperative pain.

Intraperitoneal nebulization of local a anesthetic agent is a relatively novel approach to pain management after laparoscopy. Intraperitoneal nebulization of local anesthetic allows a uniform dispersion of the agent throughout the peritoneum and combines the analgesic benefits of gas conditioning and local anesthetic instillation. Microvibration-based aerosol humidification devices (i.e. cold nebulization) deliver significant amounts of local anesthetics in the abdominal cavity. Animal studies have confirmed the safety and bioavailability of nebulized ropivicaine in the abdominal cavity. The pharmacokinetics of nebulized ropivacaine 3 mg/kg is similar to that of instilled ropivacaine and maximal ropivacaine concentrations have been found to lie well within safe ranges. Human studies have confirmed favorable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of nebulized ropivacaine. Peak concentration is attained between 10 and 30 minutes following the end of aerosolized ropivacaine delivery. Aerosolized intraperitoneal local anesthetic is feasible, with ropivacaine concentrations remaining within safe levels.

In previous randomized controlled trials in adults, nebulization of ropivacaine 30 mg with the Aeroneb Pro system either before or after laparoscopic cholecystectomy reduces postoperative pain (effect size - 33% to - 50%) as well as completely prevents shoulder pain compared with nebulization of saline. Patients receiving ropivacaine nebulization consumed significantly less morphine than those in the control group (effects size 40% to -56%). Patients receiving ropivacaine nebulization mobilized quicker than those receiving placebo with a 33% reduction on unassisted walking time after surgery. The duration of analgesia after both pre- and postoperative nebulization (up to 48 hours) was significantly longer than the expected duration of ropivacaine, based on its mechanism of action. No adverse events were reported during the conduct of these trials. Ropivicaine nebulization has also been evaluated in the context of gynecological surgery; patients receiving Ropivacaine 30 mg before or after surgical stimulation reported significantly less postoperative pain (-50%) and consumed significant less morphine (-40%) and walked without assistance than those receiving ropivacaine instillation during the first 24 hours after surgery. Furthermore, the administration of intraperitoneal aerosolized bupivacaine just prior to incising the peri-renal fascia appears to be a simple, effective and low-cost method to reduce postoperative pain in children undergoing laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children.

Given the consistently safe and favorable results documented with adult patients, the working study hypothesis is that the intra-abdominal administration of nebulized ropivacaine immediately before the onset of surgery will reduce post-operative pain and morphine consumption after laparoscopic appendectomy in children and adolescents.

Conditions
Appendicitis
Being tested
Ropivacaine, Normal saline
Medical subject headings
Appendicitis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RopivacaineDrug

    Also called Naropin

    Ropivicaine will be administered via in-line nebulization using the Aeroneb Pro™ system

  • Normal salineDrug

    Also called 0.9% saline

    Normal saline will be administered via in-line nebulization using the Aeroneb Pro™ system

Study groups in NCT02624089
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ropivacaine GroupExperimentalThis group will receive nebulized ropivacaine 0.5% based on ideal body weight at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg with a maximum total dose of 30 mg. This will be administered once at the onset of pneuomoperitoneum during appendectomy.
Receives: Drug: Ropivacaine
Placebo groupPlacebo comparatorThis group will receive placebo (normal saline) based on ideal body weight at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg with a maximum total dose of 30 mg. This will be administered at the onset of pneuomoperitoneum during appendectomy.
Receives: Drug: Normal saline
Non-enrolled groupNo interventionThis group will not receive either intervention (ropivicaine) or placebo (normal saline), but will have primary and secondary endpoints evaluated.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Post-operative morphine consumption

    The total dose of Morphine (in mg/kg) and the route of administration received after surgery will be recorded. The oral morphine dose will be converted as 1mg IV= 2mg PO.

    Measured: During hospital admission (24-48 hours)

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Post-operative Pain

    This will be serially evaluated using a Visual Analog Score

    Measured: During hospital admission (24-48 hours)

  2. Time to unassisted walking

    Measured: During hospital admission (24-48 hours)

  3. In-hospital length of stay

    Measured: During hospital admission (24-48 hours)

  4. Postoperative recovery quality

    This will be evaluated via a standardized telephone questionnaire

    Measured: Two weeks after hospital discharge

  5. Surgeon satisfaction

    this will be evaluated via a questionnaire

    Measured: Immediately after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Dec 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2016
  3. Primary completionJun 2017 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJul 2017 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02624089
Sponsor's protocol ID
14-120-PED
Acronym
NALA
Status last verified
Mar 2016
First submitted
3 Dec 2015
Last updated
22 Mar 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Baird R, Ingelmo P, Wei A, Meghani Y, Perez EV, Pelletier H, Auer G, Mujallid R, Emil S, Laberge JM, Puligandla P, Shaw K, Poenaru D. Nebulized analgesia during laparoscopic appendectomy (NALA): A randomized triple-blind placebo controlled trial. J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Jan;54(1):33-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.029. Epub 2018 Oct 5.

    PubMed 30366723

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing Ropivacaine and Normal saline in people with Appendicitis, run by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Mar 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Robert Baird, MDCM MSc (514 412 4400 ext. 24438, robert.baird@mcgill.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Post-operative morphine consumption (time frame: During hospital admission (24-48 hours)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02624089, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Mar 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in