Anorectal MalformationLOPAMNCT02624232
Long-term Outcome in Patients With Anorectal Malformations
An observational study of Anorectal Malformation, run by Odense University Hospital.
Trial summary
Background Anorectal malformations(ARM) are rare and cover congenital defective development of rectum. ARM include a range of congenital conditions and may in varying degrees involve the anorectum. A significant part have malformations in other organs mainly the urinary tract. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 10 to 31 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Anorectal Malformation
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2016to Oct 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 10 to 31 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Study population: Participants are born with anorectal malformations and subjected to surgery at the Odense University Hospital during the period 1985 - 2004.
Who may be able to join
- Surgery for anorectal malformations
Who cannot join
- Severe mental disability
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: Long-term Outcome in Patients Operated for Congenital Anorectal Malformations
Background Anorectal malformations(ARM) are rare and cover congenital defective development of rectum.
ARM include a range of congenital conditions and may in varying degrees involve the anorectum. A significant part have malformations in other organs mainly the urinary tract.
Read more
In the vast majority ARM are recognized at birth by lack of a normal anus. The primary approach is construction of a stoma and subsequent reconstruction. Bowel continuity is typical restored after 4-6 months.
Many patients experience abnormal bowel function later on and affected quality of life(QoL).
Aim
The primary objective is to assess the patient-related outcome 10-30 years after surgery for ARM and to see if it related to existing damage to anorectum and bowel function. The secondary objective is to identify problems with bowel function which may be treated medically or by surgery to improve bowel function and QoL. To obtain the necessary knowledge the study is divided in the following sub-projects:
- Assessment of bowel function and QoL through relevant questionnaires
- Examine sphincter anatomy and function through rectal ultrasound, magnetic resonans(MR)-scan of the pelvis and anal manometry. Bowel function is assessed through colonic transit time. Screening for urinary tract problems with uroflowmetry.
Methods Participants are identified through relevant diagnostic codes(Q 42) and patients which underwent surgery for ARM in the years 1985-2005 are included if informed consent is obtained.
Relevant questionnaires regarding symptoms and QoL are completed before the following examinations:
- Anal manometry
- Anal ultrasound
- Pudenda conduction velocity
- Colonic transit time
- Magnetic resonans(MR)-scan of lower abdomen and pelvis
- Uroflowmetry
Bowel function and QoL is assessed in both children and adults with relevant validated questionnaires.
Perspective No danish studies and only a few foreign investigate the relationship between anatomy/physiology and quality of life after surgery for anorectal malformations.
The investigators believe the study and included comprehensive examinations will clarify the causes of functional problems after surgery for anorectal malformations. Results of questionnaires regarding symptoms, disease-specific-and general quality of life offer a unique opportunity for targeted treatment to improve symptoms and QoL in patients with ARM.
Read the detailed description
Aim
Endpoints The primary endpoints are outcome 10-30 years after surgery for anorectal malformations and to see if it is related to existing altered anatomy, anorectal function and intestinal passage.
The secondary endpoints is to identify bowel function problems which can be treated by medicine or surgery to improve patients bowel function and quality of life.
To obtain the necessary knowledge the study will be divided in the following
Sub-projects:
- Evaluation of bowel function and quality of life with relevant questionnaire.
- Examine anorectal anatomy and function with anal ultrasound, Magnetic resonans(MR)-scan of the small pelvis and anal manometry. Overall bowel function is examined with colonic transit time. Screening for urinary problems with urodynamic testing.
Background Anorectal malformations(ARM) cover a wide spectrum of congenital disorders seen in both sexes and may also involve the urinary tract and genitals. It occurs in 1/2500 of newborns with a slight predominance in boys and 2/3 have accompanying anomalies. ARM form as an abnormal development of the hindgut which later forms the descending colon, rectum, anus, bladder and urethra. This explains frequent recurrence of accompanying malformations in the urinary tract.
The reason for the development of ARM is unknown. The etiology is probably multifactorial including both heredity and environment. A chromosomal anomaly is found among 5% of patients with ARM and Trisomy 21 being most common. Possible risk factors is maternal fever in the first trimester, industrial exposure to solvents, paternal smoking, maternal obesity and diabetes.
Accompanying anomalies often involve more organ systems. The mortality among patients with ARM is 10-20 % and is primary seen with high malformations having most severe associated anomalies including cardiac.
Previously the classification of ARM was based upon sex and the position of rectum relative to the levator ani muscle in high, intermediate and low(Wingspread classification). Pena and colleagues suggested in the mid 90s a classification system based on the presence of a fistula. Later the Krickenbeck classification system was introduced which classify ARM based on appearance, surgical approach and symptoms.
The classic surgical approach consists of an early divergent stoma, later a surgical correction and finally closure of the stoma.The classic surgical treatment of intermediate and high ARM was an abdominoperineal pull-through technique. Later Pena and colleagues introduced posterior sagittal anorectal plasty(PSARP). PSARP was adapted at Odense University hospital in 1994 and still the preferred surgical approach. Last laparoscopic assisted anorectal pull-through(LAARP) has been introduced but has not gain common accept.
Functional problems after ARM is primary fecal incontinence for high and constipation for low malformations.Treatment is primary medical or dietetic regulation of the bowel and in treatment-resistent cases anal irrigation and appendicostomy and antegrade colonic irrigation. Sometimes a permanent stoma may be needed.
Different imaging techniques and physiological measures have been used to clarify the anatomy and bowel function after surgical correction of ARM.
MRI(magnetic resonance imaging) of the pelvis has shown differences in patients with constipation and fecal incontinence after surgery for ARM. MRI provides useful information regarding pelvic musculature, colonic anatomy and other accompanying disorders. Anal ultrasound and manometry are useful to evaluate the anatomy and function of the anal sphincter. Scar tissue formation and defects in the anal sphincter are correlated to pressure in the anal canal and fecal incontinence.
A recent technique to evaluate the anorectal neuromuscular function is High Resolution Anorectal Manometry(HRAM). HRAM has previously proven to be more accurate in displaying anorectal anatomy compared to water-perfused manometry. Colonic transit time provides information about motility disorders and in patient with constipation colonic hypomobility is observed.
Pudendal nerve conduction velocity can be useful in evaluating fecal incontinence and delayed conduction velocity observed.
An essential issue regarding ARM is quality of life(QoL). A literature review by Witvliet and colleagues showed that only 20% of published studies used validated questionnaires.(30) Nine of 30 included studies on QoL were performed on an adult population. Poyet and colleagues found Health Related Quality of Life(HRQoL) was affected among patient aged one to four years compared to a control group after surgery for ARM. Hartmann et al. found no changes during a period of three years in an adult population. Women, older patients, patients with other defects and patients with a stoma reported reduced QoL.
Statistics It is mainly a descriptive study and therefore power calculation is neither possible nor relevant. In recruitment period an average of 10 patients have undergone surgery annually at the University Hospital of Odense. The investigators expect more than 50% of patients will participate and the population would be one of the largest yet seen. It will be possible to prove clinical relevant differences(20%) or correlations between different operative techniques. Further more it is possible to prove correlations between symptoms and outcome of different imaging techniques, examinations and questionnaires.
Questionnaires Symptoms and QoL are assessed with questionnaires. Bowel function after surgery for anorectal malformations is evaluated with the Krickenbeck Classification. In adults also with Wexner's Incontinence score and Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score(CCCS).
Disease-specific QoL in adults is assessed with Fecal Incontinence QoL(FIQL) and general QoL with the EQ-5D-5L. In participants below 18 years of age general QoL is assessed with Strenght and Difficulties Questionnaire(SDQ).
Urinary function and impact on quality of life in adults is evaluated with International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire - Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms(ICIQ-FLUTS) and International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire - Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms(ICIQ-MLUTS).
Sexual function is assessed with International Index of Erectile Dysfunction(IIEF) and in women with Female Sexual Function Index(FSFI).
Only Danish version of questionnaires are used.
Course plan The project will run for three years(2014-2017) and it is intended that all subjects have completed examinations before July 2016. The participants will be asked to fill in the different questionnaire regarding bowel habits, symptoms and QoL. There are planned hospitalization for participants for two days and they may stay overnight at the patient hotel or at home. Initially medical history is obtained, clinical examination performed and questionnaires collected.
Perspective No danish studies and only a few foreign investigate the relationship between anatomy/physiology and quality of life after surgery for anorectal malformations.
The investigators believe the study and included comprehensive examinations will clarify the causes of functional problems after surgery for anorectal malformations. Results of questionnaires regarding symptoms, disease-specific-and general quality of life offer a unique opportunity for targeted treatment to improve symptoms and QoL in patients with ARM.
- Conditions
- Anorectal Malformation
- Keywords
- Anorectal malformation, Anorectal atresia, anorectal stenosis, Follow-Up Studies
- Medical subject headings
- Anorectal Malformations
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with anorectal malformations | Participants are identified through relevant diagnostic codes in ICD-10(Q 42) and ICD-9(75.120, 75.121) in patients which underwent surgery for ARM in the years 1985-2005 are included if informed consent is obtained. Relevant questionnaires regarding symptoms and QoL are completed before the following examinations:anorectal manometry, endoanal ultrasonography, pudendal nerve conduction velocity, colon transit time, Magnetic resonans(MR)-scan of the pelvis and uroflowmetry. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Correlation between anorectal pathoanatomy and gastrointestinal symptoms/quality of life
Measured: Up to 6 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
Correlation between gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life
Measured: Up to 6 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2016
- Primary completionOct 2016 (estimated)
- Study completionOct 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (42)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Anorectal MalformationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Odense University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Odense University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Aarhus University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Thomas Bjørsum-Meyer, Odense University Hospital
- Investigators
- Niels Qvist, Professor, Study director, Research unit for Surgery
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02624232
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- S-20140017
- Acronym
- LOPAM
- Status last verified
- Dec 2015
- First submitted
- 17 Nov 2015
- Last updated
- 8 Dec 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Levitt MA, Pena A. Anorectal malformations. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007 Jul 26;2:33. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-2-33.
PubMed 17651510Cuschieri A; EUROCAT Working Group. Descriptive epidemiology of isolated anal anomalies: a survey of 4.6 million births in Europe. Am J Med Genet. 2001 Oct 15;103(3):207-15. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1532.abs.
PubMed 11745992Mittal A, Airon RK, Magu S, Rattan KN, Ratan SK. Associated anomalies with anorectal malformation (ARM). Indian J Pediatr. 2004 Jun;71(6):509-14. doi: 10.1007/BF02724292.
PubMed 15226560Lowry RB, Sibbald B, Bedard T. Stability of prevalence rates of anorectal malformations in the Alberta Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System 1990-2004. J Pediatr Surg. 2007 Aug;42(8):1417-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.03.045.
PubMed 17706507Jenetzky E. Prevalence estimation of anorectal malformations using German diagnosis related groups system. Pediatr Surg Int. 2007 Dec;23(12):1161-5. doi: 10.1007/s00383-007-2023-6.
PubMed 17929037Herman RS, Teitelbaum DH. Anorectal malformations. Clin Perinatol. 2012 Jun;39(2):403-22. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2012.04.001.
PubMed 22682388Marcelis C, de Blaauw I, Brunner H. Chromosomal anomalies in the etiology of anorectal malformations: a review. Am J Med Genet A. 2011 Nov;155A(11):2692-704. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34253. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
PubMed 21990113Wijers CH, de Blaauw I, Marcelis CL, Wijnen RM, Brunner H, Midrio P, Gamba P, Clementi M, Jenetzky E, Zwink N, Reutter H, Bartels E, Grasshoff-Derr S, Holland-Cunz S, Hosie S, Marzheuser S, Schmiedeke E, Cretolle C, Sarnacki S, Levitt MA, Knoers NV, Roeleveld N, van Rooij IA. Research perspectives in the etiology of congenital anorectal malformations using data of the International Consortium on Anorectal Malformations: evidence for risk factors across different populations. Pediatr Surg Int. 2010 Nov;26(11):1093-9. doi: 10.1007/s00383-010-2688-0.
PubMed 20730541Zwink N, Jenetzky E, Brenner H. Parental risk factors and anorectal malformations: systematic review and meta-analysis. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011 May 17;6:25. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-6-25.
PubMed 21586115Cuschieri A; EUROCAT Working Group. Anorectal anomalies associated with or as part of other anomalies. Am J Med Genet. 2002 Jun 15;110(2):122-30. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.10371.
PubMed 12116249Rintala RJ, Pakarinen MP. Imperforate anus: long- and short-term outcome. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2008 May;17(2):79-89. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2008.02.003.
PubMed 18395657Stephens FD. Wingspread anomalies, rarities, and super rarities of the anorectum and cloaca. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1988;24(4):581-5. No abstract available.
PubMed 3228583Pena A, Hong A. Advances in the management of anorectal malformations. Am J Surg. 2000 Nov;180(5):370-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00491-8.
PubMed 11137690Holschneider A, Hutson J, Pena A, Beket E, Chatterjee S, Coran A, Davies M, Georgeson K, Grosfeld J, Gupta D, Iwai N, Kluth D, Martucciello G, Moore S, Rintala R, Smith ED, Sripathi DV, Stephens D, Sen S, Ure B, Grasshoff S, Boemers T, Murphy F, Soylet Y, Dubbers M, Kunst M. Preliminary report on the International Conference for the Development of Standards for the Treatment of Anorectal Malformations. J Pediatr Surg. 2005 Oct;40(10):1521-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.08.002.
PubMed 16226976Levitt MA, Pena A. Outcomes from the correction of anorectal malformations. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2005 Jun;17(3):394-401. doi: 10.1097/01.mop.0000163665.36798.ac.
PubMed 15891433
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Dec 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Long-term Outcome in Patients Operated for Congenital Anorectal Malformations
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02624232
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LOPAM / S-20140017
- Conditions
- Anorectal Malformation
- Keywords
- Anorectal malformation, Anorectal atresia, anorectal stenosis, Follow-Up Studies
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Odense University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Aarhus University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark
- Study start
- Jan 2016
- Primary completion
- Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Oct 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background Anorectal malformations(ARM) are rare and cover congenital defective development of rectum.
ARM include a range of congenital conditions and may in varying degrees involve the anorectum. A significant part have malformations in other organs mainly the urinary tract.
In the vast majority ARM are recognized at birth by lack of a normal anus. The primary approach is construction of a stoma and subsequent reconstruction. Bowel continuity is typical restored after 4-6 months.
Many patients experience abnormal bowel function later on and affected quality of life(QoL).
Aim
The primary objective is to assess the patient-related outcome 10-30 years after surgery for ARM and to see if it related to existing damage to anorectum and bowel function. The secondary objective is to identify problems with bowel function which may be treated medically or by surgery to improve bowel function and QoL. To obtain the necessary knowledge the study is divided in the following sub-projects:
- Assessment of bowel function and QoL through relevant questionnaires
- Examine sphincter anatomy and function through rectal ultrasound, magnetic resonans(MR)-scan of the pelvis and anal manometry. Bowel function is assessed through colonic transit time. Screening for urinary tract problems with uroflowmetry.
Methods Participants are identified through relevant diagnostic codes(Q 42) and patients which underwent surgery for ARM in the years 1985-2005 are included if informed consent is obtained.
Relevant questionnaires regarding symptoms and QoL are completed before the following examinations:
- Anal manometry
- Anal ultrasound
- Pudenda conduction velocity
- Colonic transit time
- Magnetic resonans(MR)-scan of lower abdomen and pelvis
- Uroflowmetry
Bowel function and QoL is assessed in both children and adults with relevant validated questionnaires.
Perspective No danish studies and only a few foreign investigate the relationship between anatomy/physiology and quality of life after surgery for anorectal malformations.
The investigators believe the study and included comprehensive examinations will clarify the causes of functional problems after surgery for anorectal malformations. Results of questionnaires regarding symptoms, disease-specific-and general quality of life offer a unique opportunity for targeted treatment to improve symptoms and QoL in patients with ARM.
Detailed description
Aim
Endpoints The primary endpoints are outcome 10-30 years after surgery for anorectal malformations and to see if it is related to existing altered anatomy, anorectal function and intestinal passage.
The secondary endpoints is to identify bowel function problems which can be treated by medicine or surgery to improve patients bowel function and quality of life.
To obtain the necessary knowledge the study will be divided in the following
Sub-projects:
- Evaluation of bowel function and quality of life with relevant questionnaire.
- Examine anorectal anatomy and function with anal ultrasound, Magnetic resonans(MR)-scan of the small pelvis and anal manometry. Overall bowel function is examined with colonic transit time. Screening for urinary problems with urodynamic testing.
Background Anorectal malformations(ARM) cover a wide spectrum of congenital disorders seen in both sexes and may also involve the urinary tract and genitals. It occurs in 1/2500 of newborns with a slight predominance in boys and 2/3 have accompanying anomalies. ARM form as an abnormal development of the hindgut which later forms the descending colon, rectum, anus, bladder and urethra. This explains frequent recurrence of accompanying malformations in the urinary tract.
The reason for the development of ARM is unknown. The etiology is probably multifactorial including both heredity and environment. A chromosomal anomaly is found among 5% of patients with ARM and Trisomy 21 being most common. Possible risk factors is maternal fever in the first trimester, industrial exposure to solvents, paternal smoking, maternal obesity and diabetes.
Accompanying anomalies often involve more organ systems. The mortality among patients with ARM is 10-20 % and is primary seen with high malformations having most severe associated anomalies including cardiac.
Previously the classification of ARM was based upon sex and the position of rectum relative to the levator ani muscle in high, intermediate and low(Wingspread classification). Pena and colleagues suggested in the mid 90s a classification system based on the presence of a fistula. Later the Krickenbeck classification system was introduced which classify ARM based on appearance, surgical approach and symptoms.
The classic surgical approach consists of an early divergent stoma, later a surgical correction and finally closure of the stoma.The classic surgical treatment of intermediate and high ARM was an abdominoperineal pull-through technique. Later Pena and colleagues introduced posterior sagittal anorectal plasty(PSARP). PSARP was adapted at Odense University hospital in 1994 and still the preferred surgical approach. Last laparoscopic assisted anorectal pull-through(LAARP) has been introduced but has not gain common accept.
Functional problems after ARM is primary fecal incontinence for high and constipation for low malformations.Treatment is primary medical or dietetic regulation of the bowel and in treatment-resistent cases anal irrigation and appendicostomy and antegrade colonic irrigation. Sometimes a permanent stoma may be needed.
Different imaging techniques and physiological measures have been used to clarify the anatomy and bowel function after surgical correction of ARM.
MRI(magnetic resonance imaging) of the pelvis has shown differences in patients with constipation and fecal incontinence after surgery for ARM. MRI provides useful information regarding pelvic musculature, colonic anatomy and other accompanying disorders. Anal ultrasound and manometry are useful to evaluate the anatomy and function of the anal sphincter. Scar tissue formation and defects in the anal sphincter are correlated to pressure in the anal canal and fecal incontinence.
A recent technique to evaluate the anorectal neuromuscular function is High Resolution Anorectal Manometry(HRAM). HRAM has previously proven to be more accurate in displaying anorectal anatomy compared to water-perfused manometry. Colonic transit time provides information about motility disorders and in patient with constipation colonic hypomobility is observed.
Pudendal nerve conduction velocity can be useful in evaluating fecal incontinence and delayed conduction velocity observed.
An essential issue regarding ARM is quality of life(QoL). A literature review by Witvliet and colleagues showed that only 20% of published studies used validated questionnaires.(30) Nine of 30 included studies on QoL were performed on an adult population. Poyet and colleagues found Health Related Quality of Life(HRQoL) was affected among patient aged one to four years compared to a control group after surgery for ARM. Hartmann et al. found no changes during a period of three years in an adult population. Women, older patients, patients with other defects and patients with a stoma reported reduced QoL.
Statistics It is mainly a descriptive study and therefore power calculation is neither possible nor relevant. In recruitment period an average of 10 patients have undergone surgery annually at the University Hospital of Odense. The investigators expect more than 50% of patients will participate and the population would be one of the largest yet seen. It will be possible to prove clinical relevant differences(20%) or correlations between different operative techniques. Further more it is possible to prove correlations between symptoms and outcome of different imaging techniques, examinations and questionnaires.
Questionnaires Symptoms and QoL are assessed with questionnaires. Bowel function after surgery for anorectal malformations is evaluated with the Krickenbeck Classification. In adults also with Wexner's Incontinence score and Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score(CCCS).
Disease-specific QoL in adults is assessed with Fecal Incontinence QoL(FIQL) and general QoL with the EQ-5D-5L. In participants below 18 years of age general QoL is assessed with Strenght and Difficulties Questionnaire(SDQ).
Urinary function and impact on quality of life in adults is evaluated with International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire - Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms(ICIQ-FLUTS) and International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire - Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms(ICIQ-MLUTS).
Sexual function is assessed with International Index of Erectile Dysfunction(IIEF) and in women with Female Sexual Function Index(FSFI).
Only Danish version of questionnaires are used.
Course plan The project will run for three years(2014-2017) and it is intended that all subjects have completed examinations before July 2016. The participants will be asked to fill in the different questionnaire regarding bowel habits, symptoms and QoL. There are planned hospitalization for participants for two days and they may stay overnight at the patient hotel or at home. Initially medical history is obtained, clinical examination performed and questionnaires collected.
Perspective No danish studies and only a few foreign investigate the relationship between anatomy/physiology and quality of life after surgery for anorectal malformations.
The investigators believe the study and included comprehensive examinations will clarify the causes of functional problems after surgery for anorectal malformations. Results of questionnaires regarding symptoms, disease-specific-and general quality of life offer a unique opportunity for targeted treatment to improve symptoms and QoL in patients with ARM.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with anorectal malformations | – | –Participants are identified through relevant diagnostic codes in ICD-10(Q 42) and ICD-9(75.120, 75.121) in patients which underwent surgery for ARM in the years 1985-2005 are included if informed consent is obtained. Relevant questionnaires regarding symptoms and QoL are completed before the following examinations:anorectal manometry, endoanal ultrasonography, pudendal nerve conduction velocity, colon transit time, Magnetic resonans(MR)-scan of the pelvis and uroflowmetry. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 10 to 31 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
- Study population
- Participants are born with anorectal malformations and subjected to surgery at the Odense University Hospital during the period 1985 - 2004.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Surgery for anorectal malformations
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Severe mental disability
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Correlation between anorectal pathoanatomy and gastrointestinal symptoms/quality of life
Time frame: Up to 6 years
1 secondary outcome
Correlation between gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life
Time frame: Up to 6 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Dec 2015.
- Background: PubMed 17651510Levitt MA, Pena A. Anorectal malformations. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007 Jul 26;2:33. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-2-33.
- Background: PubMed 11745992Cuschieri A; EUROCAT Working Group. Descriptive epidemiology of isolated anal anomalies: a survey of 4.6 million births in Europe. Am J Med Genet. 2001 Oct 15;103(3):207-15. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1532.abs.
- Background: PubMed 15226560Mittal A, Airon RK, Magu S, Rattan KN, Ratan SK. Associated anomalies with anorectal malformation (ARM). Indian J Pediatr. 2004 Jun;71(6):509-14. doi: 10.1007/BF02724292.
- Background: PubMed 17706507Lowry RB, Sibbald B, Bedard T. Stability of prevalence rates of anorectal malformations in the Alberta Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System 1990-2004. J Pediatr Surg. 2007 Aug;42(8):1417-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.03.045.
- Background: PubMed 17929037Jenetzky E. Prevalence estimation of anorectal malformations using German diagnosis related groups system. Pediatr Surg Int. 2007 Dec;23(12):1161-5. doi: 10.1007/s00383-007-2023-6.
- Background: PubMed 22682388Herman RS, Teitelbaum DH. Anorectal malformations. Clin Perinatol. 2012 Jun;39(2):403-22. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2012.04.001.
- Background: PubMed 21990113Marcelis C, de Blaauw I, Brunner H. Chromosomal anomalies in the etiology of anorectal malformations: a review. Am J Med Genet A. 2011 Nov;155A(11):2692-704. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34253. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
- Background: PubMed 20730541Wijers CH, de Blaauw I, Marcelis CL, Wijnen RM, Brunner H, Midrio P, Gamba P, Clementi M, Jenetzky E, Zwink N, Reutter H, Bartels E, Grasshoff-Derr S, Holland-Cunz S, Hosie S, Marzheuser S, Schmiedeke E, Cretolle C, Sarnacki S, Levitt MA, Knoers NV, Roeleveld N, van Rooij IA. Research perspectives in the etiology of congenital anorectal malformations using data of the International Consortium on Anorectal Malformations: evidence for risk factors across different populations. Pediatr Surg Int. 2010 Nov;26(11):1093-9. doi: 10.1007/s00383-010-2688-0.
- Background: PubMed 21586115Zwink N, Jenetzky E, Brenner H. Parental risk factors and anorectal malformations: systematic review and meta-analysis. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011 May 17;6:25. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-6-25.
- Background: PubMed 12116249Cuschieri A; EUROCAT Working Group. Anorectal anomalies associated with or as part of other anomalies. Am J Med Genet. 2002 Jun 15;110(2):122-30. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.10371.
- Background: PubMed 18395657Rintala RJ, Pakarinen MP. Imperforate anus: long- and short-term outcome. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2008 May;17(2):79-89. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2008.02.003.
- Background: PubMed 3228583Stephens FD. Wingspread anomalies, rarities, and super rarities of the anorectum and cloaca. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1988;24(4):581-5. No abstract available.
- webpageLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Anorectal Malformation
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of a New Non-invasive Device With the Invasive Gold-standard Investigation to Assess Function of the Large Bowel in Children
Bowel Dysfunction, Dysmotility
Not yet recruiting
Effectiveness of Electrical Stimulation and Biofeedback on Fecal Incontinence in Children With Repaired Anorectal Malformation
Fecal Incontinence (FI), Anorectal Malformations
Recruiting
Oral Antibiotics vs. No Antibiotics in Pediatric Colorectal Surgery
Bowel Cleansing Prior to Clinical Procedures, Colorectal Anastomosis
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Long-Term Health Outcomes in Children Born With Hirschsprung's Disease and Anorectal Malformations at the Colorectal Centre of Excellence in Quebec
Anorectal Malformation, Hirschprung's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Outcomes in ARMs: Comparison Between Surgical Techniques in Patients With Perineal or Vestibular Fistula - a Multicenter Italian Study
Anorectal Malformations
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Niels Qvist, Professor study director
Research unit for Surgery
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Anorectal Malformation, run by Odense University Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Dec 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Thomas Bjørsum-Meyer, M.D. (27896089, thomas.bjoersum-meyer@rsyd.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Correlation between anorectal pathoanatomy and gastrointestinal symptoms/quality of life (time frame: Up to 6 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02624232, which also lists 42 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Dec 2015.