CollaborationNCT02628184
A Case Study of a Maternity Service Development Programme
An observational study of Collaboration, run by University of Southampton at 4 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
BACKGROUND: In 2011 a Maternity Services Development Programme was implemented in a South of England city, to promote effective collaborative working between maternity services (midwives) and other service providers (health visitors, social workers, specialist services etc.) by co-locating services in local childrens… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Collaboration
- What is being tested?
- Maternity Services Development Programme
- How many people
- 19 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Jan 2016to Sep 2016
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Service provider practitioners that have been influenced by the implementation of the Maternity Services Development Programme (including, Children Centre Staff and Practitioners (Centre Lead Practitioner/Manager, Family and Child practitioner and Frontline Receptionist), Midwives, Health Visitors, Social Workers and Additional Professional Practitioners (Nurture Practitioner, Parenting Practitioner and Early Years Teacher). Volunteer agencies have been excluded as many local groups are made up from community service users.
The inclusion criteria for this study is:
- Service providers working in, or from a local city Children's Centre (this may be in a practice base or working in the community);
- Service providers working in, or with maternity services;
- Service providers caring for families with women who are pregnant, or under the remit of maternity services (typically up to and including 6 weeks post-natally).
The exclusion criteria for this study is:
- Service providers caring for families with women no longer under the remit of maternity services (typically over 6 weeks post-natally).
- Service users (all women and families who use maternity services, inclusive of those considered vulnerable - this may be inclusive of some volunteer organisations who also provide services within children's centres).
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
United Kingdom4 sites
Buckland Children's Centre
Portsmouth, Hampshire, PO1 4PN
Mitlon Park Children's Centre
Portsmouth, Hampshire, PO4 8EU
Somerstown Children's Centre
Portsmouth, Hampshire, PO5 4LP
Paulsgrove Children's Centre
Portsmouth, Hampshire, PO6 3LP
About this study
Official title: A Case Study of a Maternity Service Development Programme and Its Influence on Inter-agency Collaboration
BACKGROUND: In 2011 a Maternity Services Development Programme was implemented in a South of England city, to promote effective collaborative working between maternity services (midwives) and other service providers (health visitors, social workers, specialist services etc.) by co-locating services in local childrens centres. The progamme ultimately aimed to improve care for local service users (women and their families), especially those considered vulnerable. Implemented changes were based on evidence that suggests poor collaborative working contributes to poorer outcomes. RATIONALE: To explore the impact of the programme on local service providers, and by association service user care. AIM: To explore a localised Maternity Services Development Programme, identifying how inter- agency collaborative working occurs, and the service providers perceived benefits and challenges on collaboration, and by association service user care. METHODOLOGY: The proposed research uses a case study approach to collect and analyse predominantly qualitative data, and some quantitative data. Data will be collected using observation episodes (e.g. participant meetings) to observe collaboration, and interviews to explore these experiences. Additionally documents will be analysed to observe documented evidence of collaborative practice. Pre-existing statistical data will also be used to highlight changes in indicators of service user well being since the implementation of the Maternity Services Development Programme. PARTICIPANTS: A cross-section of service providers (no service users) working in or with maternity services from 4 of 9 city Children Centre's. FINDINGS: No current findings, data collection expected to start September 2015.
Read the detailed description
In 2011 a Maternity Services Development Programme (MSDP) was implemented in one South of England city. The programme aimed to promote effective collaborative working between maternity services (midwives) and other service providers (health visitors, social workers, Children Centre staff, specialist and volunteer services) to improve outcomes for service users (women and families). The MSDP utilised local Children's Centres, which provide community focused family support, to co-locate maternity services and other service providers. The rationale to improve collaborative working is supported by evidence suggesting poor collaborative working contributes to poorer outcomes (Laming Report 2003; Marmot Review 2010). Therefore programmes such as the MSDP could potentially improve short and long-term outcomes for those accessing maternity services.
The proposed research uses a case study approach to collect and analyse predominantly qualitative data, and some quantitative data. This method will allow for analysis of the MSDP and understanding of its influence on maternity services and collaboration, and will aim to illuminate perceived strengths and challenges of the MSDP evident to services providers. Data will be collected using observation episodes (e.g. participant meetings) to observe collaboration, and interviews to explore experiences. Additionally documents will be analysed to observe documented evidence of collaborative practice. Pre-existing statistical data will also be used to highlight changes in indicators of service user well-being since the implementation of the MSDP.
The research will recruit a cross-section of service providers (no service users) that work in or with maternity services from four of the nine city Children Centres. Invitation letters will be circulated to potential participants through participating Children Centre management, where they will be invited to participate in the observation and interview data collection activities. They will then be able to select the extent of their participation.
- Conditions
- Collaboration
- Being tested
- Maternity Services Development Programme
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Maternity Services Development ProgrammeOther
Also called The Nurture Programme
The Maternity Services Development Programme was implemented to improve care for local families (service users) involved with maternity services. The aim was to improve care during the early stages of a family's development and to establish foundations for long-term well-being. One aspect of the programme worked to improve the delivery of care by facilitating collaboration and joint-planning between service providers. The programme uses local city Children's Centres to co-locate services (different agencies or professionals who are working within the same locality). The aim of co-location was to promote stronger collaboration between maternity services and other service provider agencies to develop stronger partnerships, and to help identify those who are (or who may become) vulnerable.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Perceived benefits or challenges of collaborative working
Measured: 2 Years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2016
- Primary completionSep 2016
- Study completionSep 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for CollaborationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 19 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Southampton
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Elizabeth Cluett, Study director, University of SouthamptonJane March-McDonald, Study director, University of Southampton
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02628184
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 13383
- Other IDs
- 170005
- Status last verified
- Jun 2021
- First submitted
- 14 Jul 2015
- Last updated
- 16 Jun 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jun 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Case Study of a Maternity Service Development Programme and Its Influence on Inter-agency Collaboration
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02628184
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 13383
- Conditions
- Collaboration
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 19 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of SouthamptonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2016
- Primary completion
- Sep 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
BACKGROUND: In 2011 a Maternity Services Development Programme was implemented in a South of England city, to promote effective collaborative working between maternity services (midwives) and other service providers (health visitors, social workers, specialist services etc.) by co-locating services in local childrens centres. The progamme ultimately aimed to improve care for local service users (women and their families), especially those considered vulnerable. Implemented changes were based on evidence that suggests poor collaborative working contributes to poorer outcomes. RATIONALE: To explore the impact of the programme on local service providers, and by association service user care. AIM: To explore a localised Maternity Services Development Programme, identifying how inter- agency collaborative working occurs, and the service providers perceived benefits and challenges on collaboration, and by association service user care. METHODOLOGY: The proposed research uses a case study approach to collect and analyse predominantly qualitative data, and some quantitative data. Data will be collected using observation episodes (e.g. participant meetings) to observe collaboration, and interviews to explore these experiences. Additionally documents will be analysed to observe documented evidence of collaborative practice. Pre-existing statistical data will also be used to highlight changes in indicators of service user well being since the implementation of the Maternity Services Development Programme. PARTICIPANTS: A cross-section of service providers (no service users) working in or with maternity services from 4 of 9 city Children Centre's. FINDINGS: No current findings, data collection expected to start September 2015.
Detailed description
In 2011 a Maternity Services Development Programme (MSDP) was implemented in one South of England city. The programme aimed to promote effective collaborative working between maternity services (midwives) and other service providers (health visitors, social workers, Children Centre staff, specialist and volunteer services) to improve outcomes for service users (women and families). The MSDP utilised local Children's Centres, which provide community focused family support, to co-locate maternity services and other service providers. The rationale to improve collaborative working is supported by evidence suggesting poor collaborative working contributes to poorer outcomes (Laming Report 2003; Marmot Review 2010). Therefore programmes such as the MSDP could potentially improve short and long-term outcomes for those accessing maternity services.
The proposed research uses a case study approach to collect and analyse predominantly qualitative data, and some quantitative data. This method will allow for analysis of the MSDP and understanding of its influence on maternity services and collaboration, and will aim to illuminate perceived strengths and challenges of the MSDP evident to services providers. Data will be collected using observation episodes (e.g. participant meetings) to observe collaboration, and interviews to explore experiences. Additionally documents will be analysed to observe documented evidence of collaborative practice. Pre-existing statistical data will also be used to highlight changes in indicators of service user well-being since the implementation of the MSDP.
The research will recruit a cross-section of service providers (no service users) that work in or with maternity services from four of the nine city Children Centres. Invitation letters will be circulated to potential participants through participating Children Centre management, where they will be invited to participate in the observation and interview data collection activities. They will then be able to select the extent of their participation.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Service provider practitioners that have been influenced by the implementation of the Maternity Services Development Programme (including, Children Centre Staff and Practitioners (Centre Lead Practitioner/Manager, Family and Child practitioner and Frontline Receptionist), Midwives, Health Visitors, Social Workers and Additional Professional Practitioners (Nurture Practitioner, Parenting Practitioner and Early Years Teacher). Volunteer agencies have been excluded as many local groups are made up from community service users.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Maternity Services Development ProgrammeAlso: The Nurture ProgrammeThe Maternity Services Development Programme was implemented to improve care for local families (service users) involved with maternity services. The aim was to improve care during the early stages of a family's development and to establish foundations for long-term well-being. One aspect of the programme worked to improve the delivery of care by facilitating collaboration and joint-planning between service providers. The programme uses local city Children's Centres to co-locate services (different agencies or professionals who are working within the same locality). The aim of co-location was to promote stronger collaboration between maternity services and other service provider agencies to develop stronger partnerships, and to help identify those who are (or who may become) vulnerable. | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Perceived benefits or challenges of collaborative working
Time frame: 2 Years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jun 2021.
Related trials for Collaboration
RecruitingObservational study
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated With Pediatric Regimen in Brazil
Acute Lymphoid Leukemia, Minimal Residual Disease
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Localised Scleroderma Quality of Life Instrument (LoSQI) in Juvenile Localised Scleroderma (JLS)
Scleroderma
Active, not recruiting
Aimmune Longitudinal Collaboration Study
Stool Spore Colony Forming Units, Microbiome Composition
RecruitingPhase 4
De-implementing Inhaled Nitric Oxide for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia
Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia
Active, not recruiting
A Collaborative Intervention for Improving Cancer Pain Management in Cancer Survivors
Hematopoietic and Lymphoid System Neoplasm, Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Elizabeth Cluett study director
University of Southampton
Jane March-McDonald study director
University of Southampton
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Collaboration, run by University of Southampton at 4 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jun 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Perceived benefits or challenges of collaborative working (time frame: 2 Years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jun 2021.