AzTrials
AzTrials

Blood Loss, SurgicalNCT02631889

Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Transcollation Technology to Reduce Bleeding in Lung Surgery

A study testing Transcollation technology and Traditional electrocautery in people with Blood Loss, Surgical, run by University of Roma La Sapienza.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Major lung resection is one of the most common procedures performed in thoracic surgery, but it may involve considerable bleeding and the occasional need for a transfusion and/or reoperation for bleeding in specific cases. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Blood Loss, Surgical
What is being tested?
Transcollation technology and Traditional electrocautery
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
170 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Mar 2016to Mar 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • To be considered for enrollment, patients must:
  • be aged ≥ 18 years (of either gender)
  • have provided written informed consent prior to participation in the study
  • undergoing to major lung surgery with an open approach.

Who cannot join

  • To be considered for enrollment, patients must not:
  • rethoracotomy
  • presence of pleural adhesions
  • coagulitive disorders or disease
  • have a known immune system disorder or immunodeficiency
  • be a participant in another interventional clinical trial or have received another investigational device or device within the last 30 days (donation of excised tissue [lung or parts of lymph nodes] for biological research may occur in the same patients)

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

mohsen ibrahim, Profssor contact

+393487325912

mohsen.ibrahim@uniroma1.it

About this study

Official title: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Transcollation Technology to Reduce Bleeding in Lung Surgery

Major lung resection is one of the most common procedures performed in thoracic surgery, but it may involve considerable bleeding and the occasional need for a transfusion and/or reoperation for bleeding in specific cases. In addition, lysis of pleural-parenchymal adhesions and dissection can represent a challenge in patients who have undergone chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy, and in patients with bronchiectasis or COPD. Several intraoperative methods have been used to manage blood loss, including topical haemostatic agents, bipolar sealers or electrocautery. Transcollation technology (TT) consists of a disposable bipolar sealer that uses a radiofrequency coagulation system to deliver a saline solution that provides haemostatic sealing of soft tissue and bone and provides localized cooling without charring. Blood loss reduction has been previously described in several fields of surgery.

The primary end-point of the proposed trial is to assess if the ability of Transcollation Technology in reducing the proportion of patients showing bleeding perioperatively within the setting of a prospective randomized controlled trial.

The secondary end-point is to assess if Transcollation Technology is able to improve postoperative outcomes reducing the length of hospital stay.

Read the detailed description

Study participation will start at signature of informed consent and each subject will be assessed preoperatively, within 4 weeks before surgery. A patient information leaflet will form the basis of discussions with the patient before written informed consent is obtained.

Patients will be evaluated intra-operatively, at 24 and 48 hours after surgery, and at discharge.

At the preoperative visit, the following information will be recorded on the patient's Case Report Form by a specialist Registrar:

  • Patient number
  • Patient initials
  • Date of visit
  • Demography (date of birth, sex, height, and weight)
  • Preoperative FEV1 and % predicted FEV1
  • Co-morbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [yes/no], current smoking habit [yes/no])
  • levels of hemoglobin (preoperative, postoperative, 24 h, 48 h and discharged)
  • perioperative complication.

Interventions

Patients undergoing Major Lung Surgery will be randomly assigned to one of two management strategies before the starting of the operation:

  1. Electrocautery Using routine instrument for hilar dissection, hemostasis and lisys of eventual pleural adhesions.
  2. Transcollation Technology Using Transcollation Technology for hilar dissection, hemostasis and lisys of eventual pleural adhesions.

Randomization Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to Transcollation technology (TT) or electrocautery. Patients will be allocated to the two different groups following a block randomization with sealed envelopes. This study is open-label: patients, investigators.

Allocation concealment The nature of the treatment precludes blinding of the surgeon administering the intervention. However, allocating, monitoring and measurement of all primary and secondary endpoints will be made by a dedicated investigator without the knowledge of, or reference to, the treatment allocation (electrocautery or Transcollation technology).

A dedicated investigator will provide a series of sealed envelopes, each containing a randomized treatment allocation. The operating surgeon will ascertain the treatment allocation for each eligible patient by opening the next available sealed randomization envelope. For each patient, the opened envelope will be attached to the Case Report Form for statistical analysis.

Sample Size Group sample sizes of 77 and 77 achieve 90% power to detect a difference of 65,0 ml of chest drain fluid at 24 h between the null hypothesis that both group means of chest drain fluid are 425,0 ml and the alternative hypothesis that the mean of group 2 is 360,0 ml with known group standard deviations of 124,0 ml, with a significance level (alpha) of 0,05 using a two-sided two-sample t-test. We consider a 10% of drop-out then we will recruit 170 patients.

Being tested
Transcollation technology, Traditional electrocautery
Medical subject headings
Blood Loss, Surgical

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Transcollation technologyDevice

    The use transcollation technology for dissection during lung surgery

  • Traditional electrocauteryDevice

    The use of traditional Electrocautery for dissection during Lung Surgery

Study groups in NCT02631889
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Transcollation technologyExperimentalthe use of transcollation technology for hilium dissection during Lung surgery
Receives: Device: Transcollation technology
Traditional ElectrocauteryActive comparatorThe use of electrocautery for hilium dissection during lung surgery
Receives: Device: Traditional electrocautery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Blood Loss, Milliliters (mL)

    The mean quantity of chest drain fluids at 24 hours of patients in the Transcollation technology (TT) group compared with electrocautery group.

    Measured: 24 hrs

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Blood loss (g/dl)

    hemoglobin level in the blood compared to the pre-operative level

    Measured: 24 hrs

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Dec 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2016
  3. Primary completionMar 2017 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMar 2017 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
170 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02631889
Sponsor's protocol ID
V1/2015
Status last verified
Dec 2015
First submitted
10 Dec 2015
Last updated
16 Dec 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • S Hammond J, Muirhead W, Zaitoun AM, Cameron IC, Lobo DN. Comparison of liver parenchymal ablation and tissue necrosis in a cadaveric bovine model using the Harmonic Scalpel, the LigaSure, the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator and the Aquamantys devices. HPB (Oxford). 2012 Dec;14(12):828-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00547.x. Epub 2012 Aug 26.

    PubMed 23134184
  • Uchiyama A, Miyoshi K, Nakamura K. VIO soft-coagulation system for major pulmonary resections: results in 68 patients with primary lung cancer. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Mar;59(3):175-8. doi: 10.1007/s11748-010-0709-5. Epub 2011 Mar 30.

    PubMed 21448793
  • Litle VR, Swanson SJ. Postoperative bleeding: coagulopathy, bleeding, hemothorax. Thorac Surg Clin. 2006 Aug;16(3):203-7, v. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2006.05.010.

    PubMed 17004547
  • Falez F, Meo A, Panegrossi G, Favetti F, La Cava F, Casella F. Blood loss reduction in cementless total hip replacement with fibrin spray or bipolar sealer: a randomised controlled trial on ninety five patients. Int Orthop. 2013 Jul;37(7):1213-7. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1903-8. Epub 2013 May 18.

    PubMed 23685830

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Transcollation technology and Traditional electrocautery in people with Blood Loss, Surgical, run by University of Roma La Sapienza.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Dec 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact mohsen ibrahim, Profssor (+393487325912, mohsen.ibrahim@uniroma1.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Blood Loss, Milliliters (mL) (time frame: 24 hrs). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02631889, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Dec 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in