AzTrials
AzTrials

AbscessPhase 4NCT02635282

IN Ketamine Vs IN Midazolam and Fentanyl for Abscess I&D

A Phase 4 study testing intranasal ketamine, intranasal fentanyl and intranasal midazolam in people with Abscess and Pain, run by University of Tennessee at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The general objective of this study is to determine whether intranasal ketamine should be incorporated into formulary as an option to treat pain during minor procedures in the pediatric emergency department. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 3 to 17 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Abscess, Pain
What is being tested?
intranasal ketamine, intranasal fentanyl and intranasal midazolam
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
19 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Aug 2016to 23 Mar 2017
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 3 to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of abscess with planned incision and drainage of a single abscess

Who cannot join

  • Fast Track patients
  • Patients who have received an opioid analgesic within the previous 4 hours of time of enrollment in study
  • Patients with parent or legal guardian not present to give informed consent for enrollment in study
  • Non-English speaking patients and/or parent
  • Patients with a contraindication for the administration of intranasal medication (nasal trauma, aberrant nasal anatomy)
  • Patients with ocular injuries
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Patients with a known allergy to ketamine, fentanyl, and/or midazolam
  • Pregnant females
  • Patients with history of seizure disorders

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Le Bonheur Children's Hospital

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38105

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Intranasal Ketamine Versus Intranasal Midazolam Plus Fentanyl in Treating Pain Associated With Incision and Drainage of Abscesses in the Pediatric Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The general objective of this study is to determine whether intranasal ketamine should be incorporated into formulary as an option to treat pain during minor procedures in the pediatric emergency department.

Read the detailed description

In the pediatric emergency department, one of the main goals in patient care is to provide adequate pain management. Many patients present to the emergency department with conditions or injuries that cause acute or chronic pain. Health care providers routinely aim to treat patients' pain in a timely manner after arrival to the emergency department. A common scenario occurs when a patient presents with a condition in which treatment will require that a potentially painful or anxiety-provoking procedure will be performed in the ED, and providers also strive to treat this pain and anxiety accordingly. There are several different methods for treating pain and anxiety, including multiple types of medications, which can be given orally, intravenously, intramuscularly, or intranasally. The use of intranasal medications for the treatment of pain and anxiety has been steadily increasing over the last decade, and this has been particularly helpful in the pediatric population. There are several advantages of using intranasal medications, including rapid onset, ease of administration, and lack of need for IV access.

At this time, this pediatric emergency department uses two different medications via the intranasal route of administration: fentanyl, a synthetic opiate, and midazolam, a benzodiazepine, which are used for pain control and anxiolysis, respectively, and these two medications are frequently used together. The objective of this study is to introduce ketamine as a third medication for intranasal use and to observe its effects on pain control; this medication is currently used either intravenously or intramuscularly in the investigator's ED. Ketamine is an anesthetic that has properties of analgesia and amnesia and has a generally favorable side effect profile. This study will observe the effects of using a medication that is already widely used in the investigator's ED, but it will be used via a different route of administration, offering advantages over other options. In this study, patients will be enrolled who have been diagnosed with a soft tissue abscess that will be treated with incision and drainage in the ED. Patients in one group will be given a dose of intranasal ketamine at a predetermined dose, and measured variables will include pain score, vital signs, patient and/or parent satisfaction, adverse effects, length of stay, and need for additional doses of ketamine or additional medications. This group of patients will be compared with another group of patients who will be given intranasal fentanyl and intranasal midazolam using a randomization through the RedCap system. The investigators hypothesize that the use of intranasal ketamine in this PED for treating pain associated with the minor procedure of incision and drainage of a soft tissue abscess will provide satisfactory pain control in these patients while offering advantages over other treatment options, as compared with patients treated with the current standard intranasal medications.

Conditions
Abscess, Pain
Being tested
intranasal ketamine, intranasal fentanyl, intranasal midazolam
Medical subject headings
Abscess, Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • intranasal ketamineDrug

  • intranasal fentanylDrug

  • intranasal midazolamDrug

    Also called Versed

Study groups in NCT02635282
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
IN fentanyl and midazolamActive comparatorgroup of patients who are randomized to receive intranasal fentanyl and midazolam
Receives: Drug: intranasal fentanyl; Drug: intranasal midazolam
IN ketamineExperimentalgroup of patients who are randomized to receive intranasal ketamine
Receives: Drug: intranasal ketamine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in pain score measured utilizing the Faces Pain Scale-Revised

    The Faces Pain Scale-Revised will be used for children ages 3-7 years

    Measured: before medication administered and at 30 minutes after medication administration

  2. Change in pain score measured utilizing the numeric pain rating scale

    The numeric pain rating scale will be used in children ages 8-17 years

    Measured: before medication administered and at 30 minutes after medication administration

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Vital sign measurements

    Temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and blood pressure will be measured

    Measured: before medication administered and at 15 and 30 minutes after medication administration

  2. Sedation score using the University of Michigan Sedation Scale

    Measured: before medication administered and at 15 and 30 minutes after medication administration

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Dec 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2016
  3. Primary completion23 Mar 2017
  4. Study completion23 Mar 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
19 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02635282
Sponsor's protocol ID
15-04113-FB
Status last verified
Mar 2017
First submitted
9 Dec 2015
Last updated
27 Mar 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Bailey B, Gravel J, Daoust R. Reliability of the visual analog scale in children with acute pain in the emergency department. Pain. 2012 Apr;153(4):839-842. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.01.006. Epub 2012 Feb 4.

    PubMed 22305630
  • Afridi SK, Giffin NJ, Kaube H, Goadsby PJ. A randomized controlled trial of intranasal ketamine in migraine with prolonged aura. Neurology. 2013 Feb 12;80(7):642-7. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182824e66. Epub 2013 Jan 30.

    PubMed 23365053
  • Andolfatto G, Willman E, Joo D, Miller P, Wong WB, Koehn M, Dobson R, Angus E, Moadebi S. Intranasal ketamine for analgesia in the emergency department: a prospective observational series. Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Oct;20(10):1050-4. doi: 10.1111/acem.12229.

    PubMed 24127709
  • Del Pizzo J, Callahan JM. Intranasal medications in pediatric emergency medicine. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2014 Jul;30(7):496-501; quiz 502-4. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000171.

    PubMed 24987995

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing intranasal ketamine, intranasal fentanyl and intranasal midazolam in people with Abscess and Pain, run by University of Tennessee at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in pain score measured utilizing the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (time frame: before medication administered and at 30 minutes after medication administration). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02635282, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Mar 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in