Breast CancerSentimarkNCT02635737
Magnetic Seed Localisation of Breast Cancers
A study testing Sentimark in people with Breast Cancer, run by Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust.
Trial summary
This is a single site, single arm, unblinded safety and feasibility cohort study investigating the use of magnetic marker seeds to localise breast tumours. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Sentimark
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 29 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 6 Jul 2016to 3 May 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study;
- Female, aged 18 years or above;
- Diagnosed with breast cancer (invasive or dcis);
- Willing to allow his or her General Practitioner and consultant, if appropriate, to be notified of participation in the study;
- Undergoing mastectomy breast surgery.
Who cannot join
- Patients with a Pacemaker or implanted device;
- Patients requiring an MRI scan prior to surgery;
- Patients with known coagulopathy or receiving anticoagulant medication including warfarin, heparin, clopidogrel or rivaroxaban;
- Patients receiving Neoadjuvant chemotherapy;
- Patients who are pregnant or lactating;
- Patients scheduled for immediate breast reconstruction;
- Patients who have received Sienna (iron oxide) injection in the previous six months;
- Patients with an existing breast haematoma close to the target lesion.
About this study
Official title: Safety and Feasibility Study of Magnetic Seed Markers to Localise Breast Cancers for Surgical Excision
This is a single site, single arm, unblinded safety and feasibility cohort study investigating the use of magnetic marker seeds to localise breast tumours.
Read the detailed description
Background and Rationale Breast Cancer Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, with great diversity in the site, size and progression of tumours. Some are palpable and discovered by the patient, though many are first detected during mammogram screening. For such cancers, localisation is necessary prior to surgery, to guide surgeons to the target excision site.
Wire Guided Localisation Traditionally, localisation involves radiographic-guided insertion of a wire into the breast, with positioning of the wire tip at the centre of the lesion. However, this procedure carries several logistical limitations , stemming from the fact that wire localisation must be performed on the day of surgery. This is to minimise risk of wire migration or dislodgement , a significant possibility due to the external section of wire left protruding from the breast. Same-day appointments demand excellent coordination between radiological departments and operating theatres to ensure that disruption to procedure scheduling is minimised. Delays may result from technically difficult procedures , leading to over-running radiology appointments that have a knock on effect on operating lists. Additionally, cancelled operations can result in preceding wire guidance procedures becoming unnecessary, resulting in wasted staff hours.
Another limitation of wire guidance occurs because the wire directs surgeons along a linear route. Lesions are found at a point along the wire, though it can be difficult to determine how far along they are found. For this reason, surgeons making initial incisions may be dictated by the visual trajectory of the wire, rather than the location of the lesion. This can lead to excessive dissection and sub optimal cosmetic results.
Radioactive Seed Localisation Radioactive seed localisation (RSL) is a localisation technique that is less commonly used in the United Kingdom (UK). A radioactive seed can be inserted up to 5 days before surgery, thus eliminating the requirement for radiology appointments on the same day as the patient's operation. The seed is detected in theatre using a handheld gamma probe. The gamma probe directs the surgeon to a single specific point via the shortest route, whereas, wires often transect the breast, meaning that surgeons commonly end up dissecting across normal tissue to locate the tip of the wire. In addition, with RSL, there is no distraction from external projections of wire, so the surgeon is guided purely by the audible response to the seed. It is hypothesised that the advantages of RSL will lead to improved surgical techniques and reduce pressures on theatre scheduling.
However, up to now, there is little evidence demonstrating clear superiority in surgical outcome of one localisation technique. Several studies have found lower positive margin rates in patients undergoing RSL versus wire guidance , , . This means that edges of excised tissues less commonly involves cancerous tissue, suggesting that RSL more accurately localises cancerous lesions. Conversely, many more studies, including one of the largest trials to date, conclude there is no variability in surgical outcome.
Regardless of stance on surgical outcome, all studies noted that RSL offers significant improvements in scheduling of appointments and patient convenience.
However, radioactive techniques are not without limitations. Several studies have evaluated the use of standard radioisotope and blue dye injections for sentinel node biopsy. Each study commented on the complex legislation regulating use of radioisotopes, particularly with regards to operator training and correct disposal and handling. In addition, radioisotope use increases patient and healthcare worker radiation exposure which, though minimal, would be preferable to avoid.
Iron Oxide Use in Breast Surgery Several studies have investigated the use of liquid injections of iron oxide rather than traditional radioisotope and blue dye injections, in sentinel node identification. Following iron oxide injections, a handheld magnetometer was used to detect the location of iron oxide in the lymph nodes. All studies concluded that iron oxide particles performed equally as well as standard radioisotope \& blue dye injections in sentinel node identification, demonstrating potential for more widespread use of the technique.
In addition, Ahmed et al tested localisation of cancerous lesions using a magnetic tracer injection. The tracer successfully localised all tumours and resulted in appropriate excisional margins, without excess tissue excision; thus demonstrating the feasibility of magnetic tracer localisation of tumours.
Sentimark Magnetic Localisation The localisation method with which this project is concerned has similar principles to RSL. However, instead of radioactive seeds, a soft magnetic seed called Sentimark, is placed into the breast. The seed is similar to a biopsy clip and can be detected using a handheld magnetometer called Sentimag. The Sentimag probe emits an alternating magnetic field that detects the magnetic response of the Sentimark seed. The magnetometer produces an audible response when held close to the Sentimark seed and can be used by surgeons to locate target excision sites. Sentimark is inserted about a week before operation, ideally during a biopsy appointment, for patient convenience.
This study will be the first to investigate magnetic seed localisation of tumours. It is hypothesised that using magnetic seeds rather than injections with a magnetic tracer will allow more accurate detection and localisation using the Sentimag probe. This is because the probe is detecting the magnetic field produced by a single discrete object, rather than a collection of iron oxide-containing liquid which may disperse throughout the breast.
Summary of Localisation Techniques The coordination and scheduling difficulties encountered in wire guided localisation, alongside the logistical and safety issues of radioisotope usage, highlight a requirement for further innovation and acquisition of new technologies in the field of localisation. It is hoped that magnetic seed localisation can act as a feasible alternative to existing technologies. Use of magnetism in localisation techniques offers a potential alternative to wire guidance and RSL.
An important consideration with the deployment of the new seed is whether the size and shape of the seed are sufficiently similar to previous designs to show similar migration patterns, as movement of the seed prior to surgery can cause incomplete lesion excision with en-suing requirements for re-operation or an increased risk of recurrence.
The migration performance of Sentimark in an implantation trial in goats, mean migration of 1.1mm with a range 0 to 3.6mm (N=10), was very similar to that observed by Alderliesten, et al. who report a mean migration of 0.8mm, range 0 to 2.8mm (N=10) for RSL seeds which was considered "clinically negligible" in RSL of human breast lesions. However, confirmation is required that the magnetic marker performs as expected in the clinic.
The study will test a soft magnetic seed (Sentimark) and its accompanying handheld magnetic probe (Sentimag) with particular consideration for its safety and performance once placed into human breast tissue.
Device The device to be studied is a small (5mm x 0.9mm) metal magnetic marker (seed) that has soft magnetic properties. This means that when exposed to a magnetic field it becomes magnetic. The magnetism can then be detected using a magnetometer and probe which gives an audible and visual signal of the strength of response from the seed and as it is directional this can accurately guide the user to the site of the magnetic seed. The magnetometer is a CE (Conformite Europeene) approved device and is used worldwide for detecting iron oxide in sentinel lymph node biopsy procedures, and is proven in clinical practice. The seed itself will be deployed by a radiologist into the centre of the tumour site using a similar technique to that used to currently place a wire into the breast. The seed itself is cylindrical and in in vivo studies in goats have shown similar migration performance to that seen with radioactive seeds in human breast tissue.
The seed has also been tested in animal tissue models by (University Hospital of South Manchester) UHSM radiologists and surgeons, and in these models it can be safely deployed by the radiologists using existing techniques. The device was detected and surgical resection was performed with 100% accuracy on all specimens. There is no radiation exposure from this device.
Study Population Adult women with capacity to consent who have a proven breast cancer requiring breast removing mastectomy surgery.
Potential Risks to Patients The device itself is a small piece of metal and in itself does not offer a likely safety risk.
- Migration of the seed - the seed is cylindrical and therefore once placed in the breast it has the potential to migrate along the path of the needle that was used to deploy it. When deployed into mammary soft tissue in animal models the device has not migrated. This study will involve placing the device in women having mastectomy so even if the device migrates it will not affect patients cancer care (as the whole breast will be removed along with the device no matter where it is located in the breast);
- Failure to detect the seed - the seed is small and the magnetic field generated is proportional to the size of the seed. This study aims to assess whether the seed can be detected in all sizes of breast as in some cases it may be possible that the seed lies too deep in the breast to be detected using the magnetometer. To ensure safe resection of the cancer, each patient in this study will be under-going a planned mastectomy, to ensure that the device is fully removed even if detection should fail;
- Tissue acceptance - the seed is produced from a single material and has demonstrated biocompatibility through ISO-10993 biocompatibility evaluation including demonstration of tissue acceptance in mammary tissue of goats (28-day implantation period). Bone wax is used as a terminal plug for Sentimark device. Bone wax is commonly used for the same purpose in brachytherapy and RSL needles. Some reaction to bone wax may occur, such as an allergic reaction or foreign body reactions (e.g. granulomas), as bone wax is a minimally resorbable implantable substance.
Potential Benefits The study will be carried out in patients requiring a mastectomy. In this population, the full cycle of marker (seed) deployment and removal can be evaluated, but as the breast is being removed as part of the planned cancer treatment, patient treatment will be unaffected should the magnetic seed not perform as intended. However, there will be no direct benefit for patients taking part in the study and the potential benefits of this study are limited to the advancement of medical knowledge. If the study confirms that the magnetic marker (seed) is safe and the method is feasible, the device has the potential to be used for localisation of breast cancers for lumpectomy surgery.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- Sentimark
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SentimarkDevice
Placement of a metallic clip with paramagnetic properties for tumour localisation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sentimark device placement | Experimental | Sentimark device placed in women having mastectomy surgery Receives: Device: Sentimark |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Migration of Sentimark Device
Migration of the device>10mm between mammograms, clip position >40mm from target lesion
Measured: 1-4 weeks from placement
Secondary outcomes (5)
Accuracy of Initial Placement
distance of the marker (seed) on radiographic imaging from the intended site of placement (e.g. lesion, marker clip, calcification) in mm
Measured: within 60 minutes of seed placement
Percentage Magnetic Markers (Seeds) Within Target Area;
The target area will be detected by mammography on the day of surgery and is defined as within 10mm of the target lesion
Measured: within 60 minutes of seed placement
Depth of Marker (Seed)
Marker (seed) depth to the nearest skin surface will be estimated sonographically in mm
Measured: within 60 minutes of seed placement
Number of Seeds Detectable on the Sentimag Detector
ability to detect the marker (seed) with Sentimag - this will be recorded whether the count is detectable on the Sentimag detector
Measured: Within 60 minutes of seed placement
Host Response to Implanted Seed Device
percentage of seeds showing foreign body reaction histopathologically
Measured: within 4 weeks of seed placement
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Study start6 Jul 2016
- Primary completion3 May 2017
- Study completion3 May 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- Endomagnetics Inc
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- James R Harvey, MBBS PhD, Principal investigator, University Hospital of South Manchester
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02635737
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2016BR005
- Acronym
- Sentimark
- Status last verified
- Jan 2021
- First submitted
- 16 Nov 2015
- Last updated
- 15 Jan 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jan 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Safety and Feasibility Study of Magnetic Seed Markers to Localise Breast Cancers for Surgical Excision
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02635737
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Sentimark / 2016BR005
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Manchester University NHS Foundation TrustOther government
- Collaborators
- Endomagnetics Inc
- Study start
- 6 Jul 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 May 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 May 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 15 Jan 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a single site, single arm, unblinded safety and feasibility cohort study investigating the use of magnetic marker seeds to localise breast tumours.
Detailed description
Background and Rationale Breast Cancer Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, with great diversity in the site, size and progression of tumours. Some are palpable and discovered by the patient, though many are first detected during mammogram screening. For such cancers, localisation is necessary prior to surgery, to guide surgeons to the target excision site.
Wire Guided Localisation Traditionally, localisation involves radiographic-guided insertion of a wire into the breast, with positioning of the wire tip at the centre of the lesion. However, this procedure carries several logistical limitations , stemming from the fact that wire localisation must be performed on the day of surgery. This is to minimise risk of wire migration or dislodgement , a significant possibility due to the external section of wire left protruding from the breast. Same-day appointments demand excellent coordination between radiological departments and operating theatres to ensure that disruption to procedure scheduling is minimised. Delays may result from technically difficult procedures , leading to over-running radiology appointments that have a knock on effect on operating lists. Additionally, cancelled operations can result in preceding wire guidance procedures becoming unnecessary, resulting in wasted staff hours.
Another limitation of wire guidance occurs because the wire directs surgeons along a linear route. Lesions are found at a point along the wire, though it can be difficult to determine how far along they are found. For this reason, surgeons making initial incisions may be dictated by the visual trajectory of the wire, rather than the location of the lesion. This can lead to excessive dissection and sub optimal cosmetic results.
Radioactive Seed Localisation Radioactive seed localisation (RSL) is a localisation technique that is less commonly used in the United Kingdom (UK). A radioactive seed can be inserted up to 5 days before surgery, thus eliminating the requirement for radiology appointments on the same day as the patient's operation. The seed is detected in theatre using a handheld gamma probe. The gamma probe directs the surgeon to a single specific point via the shortest route, whereas, wires often transect the breast, meaning that surgeons commonly end up dissecting across normal tissue to locate the tip of the wire. In addition, with RSL, there is no distraction from external projections of wire, so the surgeon is guided purely by the audible response to the seed. It is hypothesised that the advantages of RSL will lead to improved surgical techniques and reduce pressures on theatre scheduling.
However, up to now, there is little evidence demonstrating clear superiority in surgical outcome of one localisation technique. Several studies have found lower positive margin rates in patients undergoing RSL versus wire guidance , , . This means that edges of excised tissues less commonly involves cancerous tissue, suggesting that RSL more accurately localises cancerous lesions. Conversely, many more studies, including one of the largest trials to date, conclude there is no variability in surgical outcome.
Regardless of stance on surgical outcome, all studies noted that RSL offers significant improvements in scheduling of appointments and patient convenience.
However, radioactive techniques are not without limitations. Several studies have evaluated the use of standard radioisotope and blue dye injections for sentinel node biopsy. Each study commented on the complex legislation regulating use of radioisotopes, particularly with regards to operator training and correct disposal and handling. In addition, radioisotope use increases patient and healthcare worker radiation exposure which, though minimal, would be preferable to avoid.
Iron Oxide Use in Breast Surgery Several studies have investigated the use of liquid injections of iron oxide rather than traditional radioisotope and blue dye injections, in sentinel node identification. Following iron oxide injections, a handheld magnetometer was used to detect the location of iron oxide in the lymph nodes. All studies concluded that iron oxide particles performed equally as well as standard radioisotope \& blue dye injections in sentinel node identification, demonstrating potential for more widespread use of the technique.
In addition, Ahmed et al tested localisation of cancerous lesions using a magnetic tracer injection. The tracer successfully localised all tumours and resulted in appropriate excisional margins, without excess tissue excision; thus demonstrating the feasibility of magnetic tracer localisation of tumours.
Sentimark Magnetic Localisation The localisation method with which this project is concerned has similar principles to RSL. However, instead of radioactive seeds, a soft magnetic seed called Sentimark, is placed into the breast. The seed is similar to a biopsy clip and can be detected using a handheld magnetometer called Sentimag. The Sentimag probe emits an alternating magnetic field that detects the magnetic response of the Sentimark seed. The magnetometer produces an audible response when held close to the Sentimark seed and can be used by surgeons to locate target excision sites. Sentimark is inserted about a week before operation, ideally during a biopsy appointment, for patient convenience.
This study will be the first to investigate magnetic seed localisation of tumours. It is hypothesised that using magnetic seeds rather than injections with a magnetic tracer will allow more accurate detection and localisation using the Sentimag probe. This is because the probe is detecting the magnetic field produced by a single discrete object, rather than a collection of iron oxide-containing liquid which may disperse throughout the breast.
Summary of Localisation Techniques The coordination and scheduling difficulties encountered in wire guided localisation, alongside the logistical and safety issues of radioisotope usage, highlight a requirement for further innovation and acquisition of new technologies in the field of localisation. It is hoped that magnetic seed localisation can act as a feasible alternative to existing technologies. Use of magnetism in localisation techniques offers a potential alternative to wire guidance and RSL.
An important consideration with the deployment of the new seed is whether the size and shape of the seed are sufficiently similar to previous designs to show similar migration patterns, as movement of the seed prior to surgery can cause incomplete lesion excision with en-suing requirements for re-operation or an increased risk of recurrence.
The migration performance of Sentimark in an implantation trial in goats, mean migration of 1.1mm with a range 0 to 3.6mm (N=10), was very similar to that observed by Alderliesten, et al. who report a mean migration of 0.8mm, range 0 to 2.8mm (N=10) for RSL seeds which was considered "clinically negligible" in RSL of human breast lesions. However, confirmation is required that the magnetic marker performs as expected in the clinic.
The study will test a soft magnetic seed (Sentimark) and its accompanying handheld magnetic probe (Sentimag) with particular consideration for its safety and performance once placed into human breast tissue.
Device The device to be studied is a small (5mm x 0.9mm) metal magnetic marker (seed) that has soft magnetic properties. This means that when exposed to a magnetic field it becomes magnetic. The magnetism can then be detected using a magnetometer and probe which gives an audible and visual signal of the strength of response from the seed and as it is directional this can accurately guide the user to the site of the magnetic seed. The magnetometer is a CE (Conformite Europeene) approved device and is used worldwide for detecting iron oxide in sentinel lymph node biopsy procedures, and is proven in clinical practice. The seed itself will be deployed by a radiologist into the centre of the tumour site using a similar technique to that used to currently place a wire into the breast. The seed itself is cylindrical and in in vivo studies in goats have shown similar migration performance to that seen with radioactive seeds in human breast tissue.
The seed has also been tested in animal tissue models by (University Hospital of South Manchester) UHSM radiologists and surgeons, and in these models it can be safely deployed by the radiologists using existing techniques. The device was detected and surgical resection was performed with 100% accuracy on all specimens. There is no radiation exposure from this device.
Study Population Adult women with capacity to consent who have a proven breast cancer requiring breast removing mastectomy surgery.
Potential Risks to Patients The device itself is a small piece of metal and in itself does not offer a likely safety risk.
- Migration of the seed - the seed is cylindrical and therefore once placed in the breast it has the potential to migrate along the path of the needle that was used to deploy it. When deployed into mammary soft tissue in animal models the device has not migrated. This study will involve placing the device in women having mastectomy so even if the device migrates it will not affect patients cancer care (as the whole breast will be removed along with the device no matter where it is located in the breast);
- Failure to detect the seed - the seed is small and the magnetic field generated is proportional to the size of the seed. This study aims to assess whether the seed can be detected in all sizes of breast as in some cases it may be possible that the seed lies too deep in the breast to be detected using the magnetometer. To ensure safe resection of the cancer, each patient in this study will be under-going a planned mastectomy, to ensure that the device is fully removed even if detection should fail;
- Tissue acceptance - the seed is produced from a single material and has demonstrated biocompatibility through ISO-10993 biocompatibility evaluation including demonstration of tissue acceptance in mammary tissue of goats (28-day implantation period). Bone wax is used as a terminal plug for Sentimark device. Bone wax is commonly used for the same purpose in brachytherapy and RSL needles. Some reaction to bone wax may occur, such as an allergic reaction or foreign body reactions (e.g. granulomas), as bone wax is a minimally resorbable implantable substance.
Potential Benefits The study will be carried out in patients requiring a mastectomy. In this population, the full cycle of marker (seed) deployment and removal can be evaluated, but as the breast is being removed as part of the planned cancer treatment, patient treatment will be unaffected should the magnetic seed not perform as intended. However, there will be no direct benefit for patients taking part in the study and the potential benefits of this study are limited to the advancement of medical knowledge. If the study confirms that the magnetic marker (seed) is safe and the method is feasible, the device has the potential to be used for localisation of breast cancers for lumpectomy surgery.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sentimark device placement | Experimental | Device: SentimarkSentimark device placed in women having mastectomy surgery |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study;
- Female, aged 18 years or above;
- Diagnosed with breast cancer (invasive or dcis);
- Willing to allow his or her General Practitioner and consultant, if appropriate, to be notified of participation in the study;
- Undergoing mastectomy breast surgery.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patients with a Pacemaker or implanted device;
- Patients requiring an MRI scan prior to surgery;
- Patients with known coagulopathy or receiving anticoagulant medication including warfarin, heparin, clopidogrel or rivaroxaban;
- Patients receiving Neoadjuvant chemotherapy;
- Patients who are pregnant or lactating;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SentimarkPlacement of a metallic clip with paramagnetic properties for tumour localisation | Device | Sentimark device placement |
Primary outcome
Migration of Sentimark Device
Time frame: 1-4 weeks from placement
Migration of the device>10mm between mammograms, clip position >40mm from target lesion
5 secondary outcomes
Accuracy of Initial Placement
Time frame: within 60 minutes of seed placement
Percentage Magnetic Markers (Seeds) Within Target Area;
Time frame: within 60 minutes of seed placement
Depth of Marker (Seed)
Time frame: within 60 minutes of seed placement
Number of Seeds Detectable on the Sentimag Detector
Time frame: Within 60 minutes of seed placement
Host Response to Implanted Seed Device
Time frame: within 4 weeks of seed placement
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jan 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
James R Harvey, MBBS PhD principal investigator
University Hospital of South Manchester
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Sentimark in people with Breast Cancer, run by Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Jan 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Migration of Sentimark Device (time frame: 1-4 weeks from placement). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jan 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.