AzTrials
AzTrials

Dental Pulp DiseasesNCT02636504

Evaluation of Three Pulp Vitality Tests

An observational study of Dental Pulp Diseases and Dental Pulp Vitality Testing, run by Columbia University at 1 site in United States.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objectives of this study are to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of laser Doppler flowmetry in determining the vitality of teeth and comparing with those of electric pulp testing and cold testing. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Laser Doppler Flowmetry
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
150 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Dec 2026to Dec 2027
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients that need endodontic treatment will have a consultation visit first. In most cases, the endodontic treatment will be provided at a subsequent visit. In some cases the endodontic treatment will be provided at the same visit. Patients who present to the endodontic clinic for a consultation visit for endodontic treatment. The patient will have three types of pulp vitality tests done on the tooth that is to receive endodontic treatment.

Who may be able to join

  • Criteria for inclusion in the study will be that the individual has teeth that require endodontic treatment and patient is willing to undergo two additional vitality tests which will take about 20 minutes of additional time.

Who cannot join

  • No group of special subjects or vulnerable population is being targeted in this study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Sahng G Kim, DDS, MS contact

212-305-2015

sgk2114@cumc.columbia.edu

United States1 site
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center

    New York, New York, 10032

    Sahng G Kim, DDS, MS

Other trials in United States

About this study

The objectives of this study are to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of laser Doppler flowmetry in determining the vitality of teeth and comparing with those of electric pulp testing and cold testing.

Read the detailed description

Prior to starting any endodontic treatment, it is essential to determine the vitality of the tooth in question. Vitality of a tooth is defined as the presence of blood flow into the tooth. The vitality status of a tooth will affect the success of endodontic treatment, and therefore plays an important role in treatment planning. Two established methods of determining vitality are electric pulp tests and cold tests. However, both these methods have drawbacks. Both methods use the presence of sensory feedback in the tooth as a predictor of tooth vitality. This can lead to errors because blood flow and nerves in the tooth may be lost at different times, resulting in false-positive and false-negative responses. Both are subjective and patient-dependent, relying on the patient to indicate when pain is felt. In addition, studies have suggested that electric pulp testing and cold tests are not as reliable in immature teeth, teeth undergoing orthodontic movement, traumatized teeth, and teeth with significant secondary dentin. Laser Doppler flowmetry is a technique that utilizes the Doppler principle to determine blood flow. It has been used widely in the medical field to measure blood flow in the skin. Some studies have also shown good results in measuring blood flow in the pulp of teeth. The objectives of this study are to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of laser Doppler flowmetry in determining the vitality of teeth and comparing with those of electric pulp testing and cold testing.

Being tested
Laser Doppler Flowmetry
Keywords
Pulp vitality, Pulp testing
Medical subject headings
Dental Pulp Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Laser Doppler FlowmetryDevice

    Also called Cold testing, Electric Pulp Testing

    Pulp vitality of teeth is tested with three pulp vitality testing including laser Doppler flowmetry, cold testing, and electric pulp testing.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The number of teeth showing the true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative after pulp vitality testing

    Patients who present to the endodontic clinic for a consultation visit prior to treatment. The patient will have three types of pulp vitality tests done on the tooth that is to receive endodontic treatment. The number of teeth that show the true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative after pulp vitality testing will be measured. For example, a tooth that is diagnosed nonvital based on the pulp vitality testing will be confirmed when endodontic treatment is performed. If there is a discrepancy, it can be counted as false negative. When a tooth is diagnosed vital based on the pulp testing and confirmed to be vital, it can be counted as true positive. When a tooth is diagnosed vital based on the pulp testing and confirmed to be nonvital, it can be counted as false positive. When a tooth is diagnosed nonvital and confirmed novital, it is counted as true negative.

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Dec 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionDec 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
150 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02636504
Sponsor's protocol ID
AAAO5900
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
16 Dec 2015
Last updated
4 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Karayilmaz H, Kirzioglu Z. Comparison of the reliability of laser Doppler flowmetry, pulse oximetry and electric pulp tester in assessing the pulp vitality of human teeth. J Oral Rehabil. 2011 May;38(5):340-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02160.x. Epub 2010 Sep 26.

    PubMed 20868433
  • Chen E, Abbott PV. Evaluation of accuracy, reliability, and repeatability of five dental pulp tests. J Endod. 2011 Dec;37(12):1619-23. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Sep 9.

    PubMed 22099893

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Dental Pulp Diseases and Dental Pulp Vitality Testing, run by Columbia University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Sahng G Kim, DDS, MS (212-305-2015, sgk2114@cumc.columbia.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The number of teeth showing the true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative after pulp vitality testing (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02636504, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Feb 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in