AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 3EQUIRANCT02638259

Comparative Efficacy and Safety Study of GP2015 and Enbrel® in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

A Phase 3 study testing GP2015 in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Sandoz at 92 sites in 16 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Demonstrate equivalent efficacy of GP2015 and EU-authorized Enbrel in patients with moderate to severe, active (RA) who had an inadequate response to disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) including methotrexate (MTX). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis
What is being tested?
GP2015
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
376 participants
Where
92 sitesin 16 countries
Study dates
21 Feb 2015to 12 Jun 2017
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients at least 18 years of age with RA diagnosis according to ACR 1987 or ACR/EULAR 20110 criteria >/= 6 months at the time of baseline visit
  • Patient must have active disease defined as DAS28-CRP>/=3.2
  • Patients must have CRP level above ULN >5mg/l) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) >/=28mm/h
  • Patients must have inadequate clinical response to MTX at a dose of 10-25 mg/wk after proper dose escalation according to local standards

Who cannot join

  • Previous exposure to etanercept in the past
  • Patients with functional status class IV according to the ACR 1991 revised criteria
  • History of active tuberculosis (TB) or Presence of latent (inactive)TB detected by imaging and/or by the QuantiFERON-TB Gold test at screening

Trial locations and contacts

92 sites in 16 countries.

92 sites in 16 countries

United States26 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Austin, Texas, 78731

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Carrollton, Texas, 75007

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Clearwater, Florida, 33765

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    El Cajon, California, 92020

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Frederick, Maryland, 21702

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Gainesville, Florida, 32607

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Lexington, Kentucky, 40615

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Miami, Florida, 33135

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Miami, Florida, 33169

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Monroe, Louisiana, 71203

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Orchard Park, New York, 14127

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Orlando, Florida, 32804

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Peoria, Arizona, 85381

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85023

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Rapid City, South Dakota, 57701

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Spokane, Washington, 99204

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    St Louis, Missouri, 63128

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Tampa, Florida, 33603

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Trumbull, Connecticut, 06611

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Upland, California, 91786

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Van Nuys, California, 91405

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Zephyrhills, Florida, 33542

Other trials in United States

Poland9 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Elblag, 82-300

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Lublin, Lublin Voivodeship, 20-582

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Nadarzyn, 05-830

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Poznan, Greater Poland Voivodeship, 61-397

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Warsaw, 01518

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Warsaw, 02 106

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Warsaw, 02 118

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Warsaw, 02 691

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Wroclaw, 53-224

Other trials in Poland

Russia8 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Moscow, 109240

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Petrozavodsk, 185019

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Saint Petersburg, 190068

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Saratov, 410028

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Smolensk, 214025

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Voronezh, 394036

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Yaroslavl, 150003

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Yekaterinburg, 620028

Other trials in Russia

Czechia6 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Pardubice, Czech Republic, 53002

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Prague, Czech Republic, 148 00

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Prague, 128 50

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Prague, 140 00

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Prague, 140 59

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Zlín, 760 01

Other trials in Czechia

Bulgaria5 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Plovdiv, 4000

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Sofia, 1431

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Sofia, 1505

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Sofia, 1784

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Varna, 9010

Other trials in Bulgaria

Spain5 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Córdoba, 14004

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Málaga, Andalusia, 29010

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, 15706

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Seville, Andalusia, 41009

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Valencia, Valencia, 46017

Other trials in Spain

Estonia4 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Tallinn, 10117

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Tallinn, 13419

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Tartu, 50107

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Tartu, EE-50106

Other trials in Estonia

Hungary4 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Békéscsaba, H-5600

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Budapest, 1036

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Szentes, 6600

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Szolnok, H-5000

Other trials in Hungary

Lithuania4 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kaunas, LTU, LT-50161

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Klaipėda, Klaipėda County, 92288

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Panevezys, LT-35144

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Vilnius, LT 08661

Other trials in Lithuania

Mexico4 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44160

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Mérida, Yucatán, 97070

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Querétaro City, 76178

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    San Luis Potosí City, San Luis Potosí, 78240

Other trials in Mexico

Slovakia4 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bratislava, 84103

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Poprad, 058 01

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Rimavská Sobota, 979 01

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Zvolen, 960 01

Other trials in Slovakia

United Kingdom4 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Edinburgh, EH4 2XU

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS7 4SA

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Leytonstone, London, E11 1NR

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    London, NW3 2QG

Other trials in United Kingdom

Germany3 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Berlin, 12161

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Magdeburg, 39112

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    München, 80336

Other trials in Germany

Latvia3 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Liepāja, LV 3401

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Riga, LV-1038

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Riga, LV-1050

Other trials in Latvia

Italy2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Florence, FI, 50139

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Rozzano, MI, 20089

Other trials in Italy

Serbia1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Belgrade, 11000

Other trials in Serbia

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group Phase III Study to Demonstrate Equivalent Efficacy and to Compare Safety & Immunogenicity of GP2015 and Enbrel® (EU Authorized) in Patients With Moderate to Severe, Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

Demonstrate equivalent efficacy of GP2015 and EU-authorized Enbrel in patients with moderate to severe, active (RA) who had an inadequate response to disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) including methotrexate (MTX).

Read the detailed description

Demonstrate equivalent efficacy of GP2015 and EU-authorized Enbrel in patients with moderate to severe, active (RA) who had an inadequate response to disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) including methotrexate (MTX). In addition, data on the safety profiles of both products, including immunogenicity and local tolerability at the injection sites, will be collected and compared.

An additional study objective is to identify any potential risk of the transition from Enbrel to GP2015 in terms of general safety and immunogenicity in RA patients

Being tested
GP2015
Keywords
Biosimilars, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Etanercept
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • GP2015Drug

    Enbrel comparator

Study groups in NCT02638259
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
50mg GP2015ExperimentalGroup 1 will receive treatment with 50mg GP2015 by subcutaneous injection every week up to 24 weeks (Treatment Period 1) after which patients achieving at least a moderate clinical response continue treatment with 50mg GP2015 subcutaneous injection every week up to 48 weeks (Treatment Period 2).
Receives: Drug: GP2015
50mg EU-authorized EnbrelActive comparatorGroup 2 will receive treatment with 50mg EU-authorized Enbrel by subcutaneous injection every week up to 24 weeks (Treatment Period 1) after which patients achieving at least a moderate clinical response will be switched to 50 mg GP2015 subcutaneous injection every week up to 48 weeks (Treatment Period 2).
Receives: Drug: GP2015

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Safety: Change in DAS28-CRP Score From Baseline to Week 24 in Patients Treated With GP2015 and Patients Treated With Enbrel

    Disease activity score (DAS) 28-CRP is based on 28-joint count (tender and swollen joints), C-reactive protein and patient's assessment of global disease activity, values range from 0.96 to 10.0 while higher values mean a higher disease activity. • A DAS28-CRP value >5.1 corresponds to a high disease activity • A DAS28-CRP value between 3.2 and 5.1 corresponds to a moderate disease activity • A DAS28-CRP value between 2.6 and 3.2 corresponds to a low disease activity • A DAS28-CRP value < 2.6 corresponds to remission DAS28-CRP = 0.56 * sqrt(tender28) + 0.28* sqrt(swollen28) + 0.36 * ln(CRP+1) + 0.014 * GDA + 0.96 where • tender28 and swollen28 are the number of tender and swollen joints as assessed using 28-joint count • CRP is C-reactive protein (mg/l) • GDA is the global disease activity measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 100 mm

    Measured: treatment period 1: up to 24 weeks

Secondary outcomes (32)
  1. Treatment Period 1: Frequency and Severity of Injection Site Reactions in GP2015 and Enbrel

    Frequency of participants with injection site reactions in GP2015 and Enbrel

    Measured: Treatment Period 1, up to 24 weeks

  2. Treatment Period 1 - Safety : Immunogenicity by Measuring the Rate of Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Positive Patients

    Frequency of patients having anti-drug antibody (ADA) during 24 weeks (Treatment Period 1) using 1% false positive rate

    Measured: baseline, week 2, week 4, week 12, week 24

  3. Treatment Period 1- DAS28-CRP and DAS28-erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) Scores at Baseline and Weeks 4, 12 and 24;

    DAS28-CRP is a disease activity score and defined in primary outcome measure. DAS28-ESR is the DAS28 erythrocyte sedimentation rate score.

    DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR:

    1. best is 0,
    2. < 2.6 - remission,
    3. ≥ 2.6 to ≤ 3.2 - low disease activity
    4. > 3.2 to ≤ 5.1 - moderate disease activity
    5. > 5.1 - high disease activity

    DAS28-ESR = 0.56 * sqrt(tender28) + 0.28* sqrt(swollen28) + 0.7 * ln(ESR) + 0.014 * GDA where • tender28 and swollen28 are the number of tender and swollen joints as assessed using 28-joint count • CRP is C-reactive protein (mg/l) • ESR is erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/h) • GDA is the global disease activity measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 100 mm

    Measured: week 4, 12, 24

  4. Treatment Period 1 - Changes From Baseline in DAS28-CRP and DAS-ESR Scores to Weeks 4, 12 and 24

    Measured: baseline, Week 4, week 12, week 24

  5. Treatment Period 1- Proportion of Patients Achieving EULAR Response

    Proportion of patients achieving European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) good response (defined as DAS28 ≤ 3.2 and DAS28 improvement from Baseline > 1.2) and moderate response (defined as DAS28 ≤ 3.2 and DAS28 improvement > 0.6 and ≤ 1.2, or DAS28 > 3.2 and ≤ 5.1 and DAS28 improvement > 0.6 or DAS28 > 5.1 but DAS28 improvement > 1.2) ;

    Measured: week 4, week 12 and week 24

  6. Treatment Period 1- Proportion of Patients Achieving DAS28 < 2.6 at Weeks 4, 12 and 24

    % patients in DAS28-ESR categories up to week 24

    Measured: week 4, week 12 and week 24

  7. Treatment Period 1- Proportion of Patients Achieving EULAR/ACR Boolean Remission Criteria

    Proportion of patients achieving EULAR/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) Boolean remission criteria (defined as number of tender joints/swollen joints ≤ 1 and CRP (mg/dL) ≤ 1 and patient global assessment (1-10) ≤ 1) at Weeks 4, 12 and 24;

    Measured: week 4, week 12, week 24

  8. Treatment Period 1- Proportion of Patients Achieving ACR20/50/70 Response at Weeks 4, 12 and 24;

    ACR20 response was defined if a patient fulfilled all 3 criteria below:

    • 20% improvement in tender 68 joint-count
    • 20% improvement in swollen 68 joint-count;

    And 20% improvement in at least 3 of the following 5 measures:

    • Patient's assessment of RA pain (visual analogue scale (VAS) 100 mm),
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm),
    • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm),
    • Patient self-assessed disability (HAQ score),
    • Acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR). ACR50 and ACR70 responses were defined as ACR20 response replacing "20% improvement" by "50% improvement" and "70% improvement", respectively.

    Measured: Week 4, week 12 and week 24

  9. Treatment Period 1- ACR-N Scores at Weeks 4, 12 and 24;

    ACR-N (American College of Rheumatology percentage of improvement): negative is worsening, positive (up to 100) is an improvement.

    ACR-N is a single number that characterizes the percentage of improvement from Baseline that a patient has experienced in analogy to ACR20 described above. ACR-N of X (such as 38) means that the patient had achieved an improvement of at least X% (such as 38%) in tender and swollen joints, and an improvement of at least X% (such as 38%) in 3 of the 5 other parameters mentioned above.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 12 and 24;

  10. Treatment Period 1 - Proportion of Patients in Each Disease Activity Category as Defined by SDAI

    Proportion of patients in each disease activity category as defined by the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI): high disease activity, SDAI > 26, moderate disease activity, SDAI > 11 to ≤ 26, low disease activity, SDAI > 3.3 to ≤ 11, and remission, SDAI ≤ 3.3 at Weeks 4, 12 and 24; SDAI and CDAI are measures of disease activity in RA. The scores were calculated by numerical summation of the number of tender and swollen joints (using the 28-joint count), and the patient's and physician's global assessment of disease activity.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 12 and 24;

  11. Treatment Period 1 - Proportion of Patients in Each Disease Activity Category as Defined by CDAI

    Proportion of patients in each disease activity category as defined by the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI): high disease activity, CDAI > 22, moderate disease activity, CDAI > 10 to ≤ 22, low disease activity, CDAI > 2.8 to ≤ 10, and remission, CDAI ≤ 2.8 at Weeks 4, 12 and 24; SDAI and CDAI are measures of disease activity in RA. The scores were calculated by numerical summation of the number of tender and swollen joints (using the 28-joint count), and the patient's and physician's global assessment of disease activity.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 12 and 24;

  12. Treatment Period 1- Proportion of Patients Achieving HAQ Index in Normal Range (≤ 0.5) at Weeks 4, 12 and 24;

    Health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) disability index ranges from 0 (best) to 3 (worst)

    Measured: Weeks 4, 12 and 24;

  13. Treatment Period 1 - Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Index at Baseline, Weeks 4, 12 and 24;

    Health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) disability index ranges from 0 (best) to 3 (worst)

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12 and 24;

  14. Treatment Period 1 - Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale Relative to Baseline at Weeks 4, 12 and 24;

    FACIT fatigue scale is a 13- item questionnaire that assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function, ranging from 0 (worst) to 52 (best). A score of less than 30 indicates severe fatigue.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12 and 24;

  15. Treatment Period 1 - CRP Levels at Baseline and Weeks 4, 12 and 24

    Measured: Weeks 4, 12 and 24

  16. Treatment Period 1 - ESR Levels at Baseline and Weeks 4, 12 and 24

    Measured: Weeks 4, 12 and 24

  17. Treatment Period 2: DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR Scores up to Week 48;

    DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR:

    1. best is 0,
    2. < 2.6 - remission,
    3. ≥ 2.6 to ≤ 3.2 - low disease activity
    4. > 3.2 to ≤ 5.1 - moderate disease activity
    5. > 5.1 - high disease activity

    Measured: Baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36 and week 48.

  18. Treatment Period 2 : Changes From Baseline in DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR Scores From Week 4 up to Week 48

    Measured: week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36, week 48

  19. Treatment Period 2: Proportion of Patients Achieving EULAR Reponse

    Proportion of patients achieving EULAR good response (defined as DAS28 ≤ 3.2 and DAS28 improvement from Baseline > 1.2) and moderate response (defined as DAS28 ≤ 3.2 and DAS28 improvement > 0.6 and ≤ 1.2, or DAS28 > 3.2 and ≤ 5.1 and DAS28 improvement > 0.6 or DAS28 > 5.1 but DAS28 improvement > 1.2) at Weeks 36 and 48;

    Measured: week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36 and week 48

  20. Treatment Period 2 : Proportion of Patients Achieving DAS28 < 2.6 at Weeks 36 and 48;

    percentage of participants in DAS28-ESR categories up to week 48

    Measured: week 36 and week 48

  21. Treatment Period 2 : Proportion of Patients Achieving EULAR/ACR Boolean Remission Criteria

    Proportion of patients achieving EULAR/ACR Boolean remission criteria (defined as number of tender joints/swollen joints ≤ 1 and CRP (mg/dL) ≤ 1 and patient global assessment (1-10) ≤ 1) at Weeks 36 and 48;

    Measured: week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36, week 48

  22. Treatment Period 2 : Proportion of Patients Achieving ACR20/50/70 Response at Weeks 36 and 48;

    Measured: week 36 and week 48

  23. Treatment Period 2 : ACR-N Scores at Weeks 36 and 48;

    ACR-N: negative is worsening, positive (up to 100) is an improvement

    Measured: week 36 and week 48

  24. Treatment Period 2 : Proportion of Patients in Each Disease Activity Category as Defined by SDAI

    Proportion of patients in each disease activity category as defined by the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI): high disease activity, SDAI > 26, moderate disease activity, SDAI > 11 to ≤ 26, low disease activity, SDAI > 3.3 to ≤ 11, and remission, SDAI ≤ 3.3 at Weeks 36 and 48.

    Measured: baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36. week 48

  25. Treatment Period 2 : Proportion of Patients in Each Disease Activity Category as Defined by CDAI

    Proportion of patients in each disease activity category as defined by the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI): high disease activity, CDAI > 22, moderate disease activity, CDAI > 10 to ≤ 22, low disease activity, CDAI > 2.8 to ≤ 10, and remission, CDAI ≤ 2.8 at Weeks 36 and 48;

    Measured: baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36 and week 48

  26. Treatment Period 2 :Proportion of Patients Achieving HAQ Index in Normal Range (≤ 0.5) at Weeks 36 and 48;

    Measured: baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36, week 48

  27. Treatment Period 2 :HAQ Index at Weeks 36 and 48;

    HAQ: from 0 (best) to 3 (worst)

    Measured: baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36, week 48

  28. Treatment Period 2 : Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale Relative to Baseline at Weeks 36 and 48;

    FACIT: from 0 (worst) to 52 (best), a score of less than 30 indicates severe fatigue

    Measured: baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36, week 48

  29. Treatment Period 2 : CRP Levels at Week 36 and 48

    Measured: baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36, week 48

  30. Treatment Period 2 : ESR Levels at Week 36 and 48

    Measured: baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36, week 48

  31. Safety - Overall Study : Frequency and Severity of Injection Site Reactions in GP2015 and Enbrel

    Frequency of participants with injection site reactions in GP2015 and Enbrel

    Measured: up to 48 weeks

  32. Safety : Overall Study: Immunogenicity by Measuring the Rate of Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Positive Patients

    To assess the immunogenicity of continuous GP2015 treatment versus a treatment transition from Enbrel to GP2015 after 24 weeks of treatment by measuring the rate of ADA positive participants at Weeks 24, 30, 36 and 48. summary of ADA positive data up to week 48 using a 1% false positive cut point

    Measured: baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36, week 48

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Dec 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start21 Feb 2015
  3. Primary completion29 Dec 2016
  4. Study completion12 Jun 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
376 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02638259
Sponsor's protocol ID
GP15-301
Acronym
EQUIRA
Status last verified
Sep 2018
First submitted
16 Dec 2015
Last updated
19 Sep 2018
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: Via CSR

Publications

  • Thaci D, Gerdes S, Schulze-Koops H, Allanore Y, Kavanaugh A, Both C, Gattu S, Hachaichi S, Matucci-Cerinic M. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriasis, or Psoriatic Arthritis Treated with GP2015, an Etanercept Biosimilar: Results from Two Phase III Studies (EGALITY and EQUIRA). Drugs R D. 2025 Jun;25(2):107-115. doi: 10.1007/s40268-025-00507-8. Epub 2025 Apr 25.

    PubMed 40279006
  • Jaworski J, Matucci-Cerinic M, Schulze-Koops H, Buch MH, Kucharz EJ, Allanore Y, Kavanaugh A, Young P, Babic G. Switch from reference etanercept to SDZ ETN, an etanercept biosimilar, does not impact efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of etanercept in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis: 48-week results from the phase III, randomized, double-blind EQUIRA study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 May 28;21(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1907-x.

    PubMed 31138316
  • Matucci-Cerinic M, Allanore Y, Kavanaugh A, Buch MH, Schulze-Koops H, Kucharz EJ, Woehling H, Babic G, Poetzl J, Davis A, Schwebig A. Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of GP2015, an etanercept biosimilar, compared with the reference etanercept in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis: 24-week results from the comparative phase III, randomised, double-blind EQUIRA study. RMD Open. 2018 Nov 14;4(2):e000757. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000757. eCollection 2018.

    PubMed 30487998

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing GP2015 in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Sandoz at 92 sites in 16 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 92 sites in United States, Poland, Russia, Czechia, Bulgaria and 11 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Feb 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Safety: Change in DAS28-CRP Score From Baseline to Week 24 in Patients Treated With GP2015 and Patients Treated With Enbrel (time frame: treatment period 1: up to 24 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02638259, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in