Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 3EQUIRANCT02638259
Comparative Efficacy and Safety Study of GP2015 and Enbrel® in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
A Phase 3 study testing GP2015 in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Sandoz at 92 sites in 16 countries.
Trial summary
Demonstrate equivalent efficacy of GP2015 and EU-authorized Enbrel in patients with moderate to severe, active (RA) who had an inadequate response to disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) including methotrexate (MTX). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- GP2015
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 376 participants
- Where
- 92 sitesin 16 countries
- Study dates
- 21 Feb 2015to 12 Jun 2017
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients at least 18 years of age with RA diagnosis according to ACR 1987 or ACR/EULAR 20110 criteria >/= 6 months at the time of baseline visit
- Patient must have active disease defined as DAS28-CRP>/=3.2
- Patients must have CRP level above ULN >5mg/l) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) >/=28mm/h
- Patients must have inadequate clinical response to MTX at a dose of 10-25 mg/wk after proper dose escalation according to local standards
Who cannot join
- Previous exposure to etanercept in the past
- Patients with functional status class IV according to the ACR 1991 revised criteria
- History of active tuberculosis (TB) or Presence of latent (inactive)TB detected by imaging and/or by the QuantiFERON-TB Gold test at screening
Trial locations and contacts
92 sites in 16 countries.
92 sites in 16 countries
United States26 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Austin, Texas, 78731
Novartis Investigative Site
Carrollton, Texas, 75007
Novartis Investigative Site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210
Novartis Investigative Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Novartis Investigative Site
Clearwater, Florida, 33765
Novartis Investigative Site
El Cajon, California, 92020
Novartis Investigative Site
Frederick, Maryland, 21702
Novartis Investigative Site
Gainesville, Florida, 32607
Novartis Investigative Site
Lexington, Kentucky, 40615
Novartis Investigative Site
Miami, Florida, 33135
Novartis Investigative Site
Miami, Florida, 33169
Novartis Investigative Site
Monroe, Louisiana, 71203
Novartis Investigative Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103
Novartis Investigative Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112
Novartis Investigative Site
Orchard Park, New York, 14127
Novartis Investigative Site
Orlando, Florida, 32804
Novartis Investigative Site
Peoria, Arizona, 85381
Novartis Investigative Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85023
Novartis Investigative Site
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57701
Novartis Investigative Site
Spokane, Washington, 99204
Novartis Investigative Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63128
Novartis Investigative Site
Tampa, Florida, 33603
Novartis Investigative Site
Trumbull, Connecticut, 06611
Novartis Investigative Site
Upland, California, 91786
Novartis Investigative Site
Van Nuys, California, 91405
Novartis Investigative Site
Zephyrhills, Florida, 33542
Poland9 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Elblag, 82-300
Novartis Investigative Site
Lublin, Lublin Voivodeship, 20-582
Novartis Investigative Site
Nadarzyn, 05-830
Novartis Investigative Site
Poznan, Greater Poland Voivodeship, 61-397
Novartis Investigative Site
Warsaw, 01518
Novartis Investigative Site
Warsaw, 02 106
Novartis Investigative Site
Warsaw, 02 118
Novartis Investigative Site
Warsaw, 02 691
Novartis Investigative Site
Wroclaw, 53-224
Russia8 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, 109240
Novartis Investigative Site
Petrozavodsk, 185019
Novartis Investigative Site
Saint Petersburg, 190068
Novartis Investigative Site
Saratov, 410028
Novartis Investigative Site
Smolensk, 214025
Novartis Investigative Site
Voronezh, 394036
Novartis Investigative Site
Yaroslavl, 150003
Novartis Investigative Site
Yekaterinburg, 620028
Czechia6 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Pardubice, Czech Republic, 53002
Novartis Investigative Site
Prague, Czech Republic, 148 00
Novartis Investigative Site
Prague, 128 50
Novartis Investigative Site
Prague, 140 00
Novartis Investigative Site
Prague, 140 59
Novartis Investigative Site
Zlín, 760 01
Bulgaria5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Plovdiv, 4000
Novartis Investigative Site
Sofia, 1431
Novartis Investigative Site
Sofia, 1505
Novartis Investigative Site
Sofia, 1784
Novartis Investigative Site
Varna, 9010
Spain5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Córdoba, 14004
Novartis Investigative Site
Málaga, Andalusia, 29010
Novartis Investigative Site
Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, 15706
Novartis Investigative Site
Seville, Andalusia, 41009
Novartis Investigative Site
Valencia, Valencia, 46017
Estonia4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Tallinn, 10117
Novartis Investigative Site
Tallinn, 13419
Novartis Investigative Site
Tartu, 50107
Novartis Investigative Site
Tartu, EE-50106
Hungary4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Békéscsaba, H-5600
Novartis Investigative Site
Budapest, 1036
Novartis Investigative Site
Szentes, 6600
Novartis Investigative Site
Szolnok, H-5000
Lithuania4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Kaunas, LTU, LT-50161
Novartis Investigative Site
Klaipėda, Klaipėda County, 92288
Novartis Investigative Site
Panevezys, LT-35144
Novartis Investigative Site
Vilnius, LT 08661
Mexico4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44160
Novartis Investigative Site
Mérida, Yucatán, 97070
Novartis Investigative Site
Querétaro City, 76178
Novartis Investigative Site
San Luis Potosí City, San Luis Potosí, 78240
Slovakia4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bratislava, 84103
Novartis Investigative Site
Poprad, 058 01
Novartis Investigative Site
Rimavská Sobota, 979 01
Novartis Investigative Site
Zvolen, 960 01
United Kingdom4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Edinburgh, EH4 2XU
Novartis Investigative Site
Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS7 4SA
Novartis Investigative Site
Leytonstone, London, E11 1NR
Novartis Investigative Site
London, NW3 2QG
Germany3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, 12161
Novartis Investigative Site
Magdeburg, 39112
Novartis Investigative Site
München, 80336
Latvia3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Liepāja, LV 3401
Novartis Investigative Site
Riga, LV-1038
Novartis Investigative Site
Riga, LV-1050
Italy2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Florence, FI, 50139
Novartis Investigative Site
Rozzano, MI, 20089
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group Phase III Study to Demonstrate Equivalent Efficacy and to Compare Safety & Immunogenicity of GP2015 and Enbrel® (EU Authorized) in Patients With Moderate to Severe, Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Demonstrate equivalent efficacy of GP2015 and EU-authorized Enbrel in patients with moderate to severe, active (RA) who had an inadequate response to disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) including methotrexate (MTX).
Read the detailed description
Demonstrate equivalent efficacy of GP2015 and EU-authorized Enbrel in patients with moderate to severe, active (RA) who had an inadequate response to disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) including methotrexate (MTX). In addition, data on the safety profiles of both products, including immunogenicity and local tolerability at the injection sites, will be collected and compared.
An additional study objective is to identify any potential risk of the transition from Enbrel to GP2015 in terms of general safety and immunogenicity in RA patients
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- GP2015
- Keywords
- Biosimilars, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Etanercept
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
GP2015Drug
Enbrel comparator
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 50mg GP2015 | Experimental | Group 1 will receive treatment with 50mg GP2015 by subcutaneous injection every week up to 24 weeks (Treatment Period 1) after which patients achieving at least a moderate clinical response continue treatment with 50mg GP2015 subcutaneous injection every week up to 48 weeks (Treatment Period 2). Receives: Drug: GP2015 |
| 50mg EU-authorized Enbrel | Active comparator | Group 2 will receive treatment with 50mg EU-authorized Enbrel by subcutaneous injection every week up to 24 weeks (Treatment Period 1) after which patients achieving at least a moderate clinical response will be switched to 50 mg GP2015 subcutaneous injection every week up to 48 weeks (Treatment Period 2). Receives: Drug: GP2015 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Safety: Change in DAS28-CRP Score From Baseline to Week 24 in Patients Treated With GP2015 and Patients Treated With Enbrel
Disease activity score (DAS) 28-CRP is based on 28-joint count (tender and swollen joints), C-reactive protein and patient's assessment of global disease activity, values range from 0.96 to 10.0 while higher values mean a higher disease activity. • A DAS28-CRP value >5.1 corresponds to a high disease activity • A DAS28-CRP value between 3.2 and 5.1 corresponds to a moderate disease activity • A DAS28-CRP value between 2.6 and 3.2 corresponds to a low disease activity • A DAS28-CRP value < 2.6 corresponds to remission DAS28-CRP = 0.56 * sqrt(tender28) + 0.28* sqrt(swollen28) + 0.36 * ln(CRP+1) + 0.014 * GDA + 0.96 where • tender28 and swollen28 are the number of tender and swollen joints as assessed using 28-joint count • CRP is C-reactive protein (mg/l) • GDA is the global disease activity measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 100 mm
Measured: treatment period 1: up to 24 weeks
Secondary outcomes (32)
Treatment Period 1: Frequency and Severity of Injection Site Reactions in GP2015 and Enbrel
Frequency of participants with injection site reactions in GP2015 and Enbrel
Measured: Treatment Period 1, up to 24 weeks
Treatment Period 1 - Safety : Immunogenicity by Measuring the Rate of Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Positive Patients
Frequency of patients having anti-drug antibody (ADA) during 24 weeks (Treatment Period 1) using 1% false positive rate
Measured: baseline, week 2, week 4, week 12, week 24
Treatment Period 1- DAS28-CRP and DAS28-erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) Scores at Baseline and Weeks 4, 12 and 24;
DAS28-CRP is a disease activity score and defined in primary outcome measure. DAS28-ESR is the DAS28 erythrocyte sedimentation rate score.
DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR:
- best is 0,
- < 2.6 - remission,
- ≥ 2.6 to ≤ 3.2 - low disease activity
- > 3.2 to ≤ 5.1 - moderate disease activity
- > 5.1 - high disease activity
DAS28-ESR = 0.56 * sqrt(tender28) + 0.28* sqrt(swollen28) + 0.7 * ln(ESR) + 0.014 * GDA where • tender28 and swollen28 are the number of tender and swollen joints as assessed using 28-joint count • CRP is C-reactive protein (mg/l) • ESR is erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/h) • GDA is the global disease activity measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 100 mm
Measured: week 4, 12, 24
Treatment Period 1 - Changes From Baseline in DAS28-CRP and DAS-ESR Scores to Weeks 4, 12 and 24
Measured: baseline, Week 4, week 12, week 24
Treatment Period 1- Proportion of Patients Achieving EULAR Response
Proportion of patients achieving European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) good response (defined as DAS28 ≤ 3.2 and DAS28 improvement from Baseline > 1.2) and moderate response (defined as DAS28 ≤ 3.2 and DAS28 improvement > 0.6 and ≤ 1.2, or DAS28 > 3.2 and ≤ 5.1 and DAS28 improvement > 0.6 or DAS28 > 5.1 but DAS28 improvement > 1.2) ;
Measured: week 4, week 12 and week 24
Treatment Period 1- Proportion of Patients Achieving DAS28 < 2.6 at Weeks 4, 12 and 24
% patients in DAS28-ESR categories up to week 24
Measured: week 4, week 12 and week 24
Treatment Period 1- Proportion of Patients Achieving EULAR/ACR Boolean Remission Criteria
Proportion of patients achieving EULAR/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) Boolean remission criteria (defined as number of tender joints/swollen joints ≤ 1 and CRP (mg/dL) ≤ 1 and patient global assessment (1-10) ≤ 1) at Weeks 4, 12 and 24;
Measured: week 4, week 12, week 24
Treatment Period 1- Proportion of Patients Achieving ACR20/50/70 Response at Weeks 4, 12 and 24;
ACR20 response was defined if a patient fulfilled all 3 criteria below:
- 20% improvement in tender 68 joint-count
- 20% improvement in swollen 68 joint-count;
And 20% improvement in at least 3 of the following 5 measures:
- Patient's assessment of RA pain (visual analogue scale (VAS) 100 mm),
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm),
- Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm),
- Patient self-assessed disability (HAQ score),
- Acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR). ACR50 and ACR70 responses were defined as ACR20 response replacing "20% improvement" by "50% improvement" and "70% improvement", respectively.
Measured: Week 4, week 12 and week 24
Treatment Period 1- ACR-N Scores at Weeks 4, 12 and 24;
ACR-N (American College of Rheumatology percentage of improvement): negative is worsening, positive (up to 100) is an improvement.
ACR-N is a single number that characterizes the percentage of improvement from Baseline that a patient has experienced in analogy to ACR20 described above. ACR-N of X (such as 38) means that the patient had achieved an improvement of at least X% (such as 38%) in tender and swollen joints, and an improvement of at least X% (such as 38%) in 3 of the 5 other parameters mentioned above.
Measured: Weeks 4, 12 and 24;
Treatment Period 1 - Proportion of Patients in Each Disease Activity Category as Defined by SDAI
Proportion of patients in each disease activity category as defined by the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI): high disease activity, SDAI > 26, moderate disease activity, SDAI > 11 to ≤ 26, low disease activity, SDAI > 3.3 to ≤ 11, and remission, SDAI ≤ 3.3 at Weeks 4, 12 and 24; SDAI and CDAI are measures of disease activity in RA. The scores were calculated by numerical summation of the number of tender and swollen joints (using the 28-joint count), and the patient's and physician's global assessment of disease activity.
Measured: Weeks 4, 12 and 24;
Treatment Period 1 - Proportion of Patients in Each Disease Activity Category as Defined by CDAI
Proportion of patients in each disease activity category as defined by the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI): high disease activity, CDAI > 22, moderate disease activity, CDAI > 10 to ≤ 22, low disease activity, CDAI > 2.8 to ≤ 10, and remission, CDAI ≤ 2.8 at Weeks 4, 12 and 24; SDAI and CDAI are measures of disease activity in RA. The scores were calculated by numerical summation of the number of tender and swollen joints (using the 28-joint count), and the patient's and physician's global assessment of disease activity.
Measured: Weeks 4, 12 and 24;
Treatment Period 1- Proportion of Patients Achieving HAQ Index in Normal Range (≤ 0.5) at Weeks 4, 12 and 24;
Health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) disability index ranges from 0 (best) to 3 (worst)
Measured: Weeks 4, 12 and 24;
Treatment Period 1 - Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Index at Baseline, Weeks 4, 12 and 24;
Health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) disability index ranges from 0 (best) to 3 (worst)
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12 and 24;
Treatment Period 1 - Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale Relative to Baseline at Weeks 4, 12 and 24;
FACIT fatigue scale is a 13- item questionnaire that assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function, ranging from 0 (worst) to 52 (best). A score of less than 30 indicates severe fatigue.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12 and 24;
Treatment Period 1 - CRP Levels at Baseline and Weeks 4, 12 and 24
Measured: Weeks 4, 12 and 24
Treatment Period 1 - ESR Levels at Baseline and Weeks 4, 12 and 24
Measured: Weeks 4, 12 and 24
Treatment Period 2: DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR Scores up to Week 48;
DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR:
- best is 0,
- < 2.6 - remission,
- ≥ 2.6 to ≤ 3.2 - low disease activity
- > 3.2 to ≤ 5.1 - moderate disease activity
- > 5.1 - high disease activity
Measured: Baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36 and week 48.
Treatment Period 2 : Changes From Baseline in DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR Scores From Week 4 up to Week 48
Measured: week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36, week 48
Treatment Period 2: Proportion of Patients Achieving EULAR Reponse
Proportion of patients achieving EULAR good response (defined as DAS28 ≤ 3.2 and DAS28 improvement from Baseline > 1.2) and moderate response (defined as DAS28 ≤ 3.2 and DAS28 improvement > 0.6 and ≤ 1.2, or DAS28 > 3.2 and ≤ 5.1 and DAS28 improvement > 0.6 or DAS28 > 5.1 but DAS28 improvement > 1.2) at Weeks 36 and 48;
Measured: week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36 and week 48
Treatment Period 2 : Proportion of Patients Achieving DAS28 < 2.6 at Weeks 36 and 48;
percentage of participants in DAS28-ESR categories up to week 48
Measured: week 36 and week 48
Treatment Period 2 : Proportion of Patients Achieving EULAR/ACR Boolean Remission Criteria
Proportion of patients achieving EULAR/ACR Boolean remission criteria (defined as number of tender joints/swollen joints ≤ 1 and CRP (mg/dL) ≤ 1 and patient global assessment (1-10) ≤ 1) at Weeks 36 and 48;
Measured: week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36, week 48
Treatment Period 2 : Proportion of Patients Achieving ACR20/50/70 Response at Weeks 36 and 48;
Measured: week 36 and week 48
Treatment Period 2 : ACR-N Scores at Weeks 36 and 48;
ACR-N: negative is worsening, positive (up to 100) is an improvement
Measured: week 36 and week 48
Treatment Period 2 : Proportion of Patients in Each Disease Activity Category as Defined by SDAI
Proportion of patients in each disease activity category as defined by the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI): high disease activity, SDAI > 26, moderate disease activity, SDAI > 11 to ≤ 26, low disease activity, SDAI > 3.3 to ≤ 11, and remission, SDAI ≤ 3.3 at Weeks 36 and 48.
Measured: baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36. week 48
Treatment Period 2 : Proportion of Patients in Each Disease Activity Category as Defined by CDAI
Proportion of patients in each disease activity category as defined by the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI): high disease activity, CDAI > 22, moderate disease activity, CDAI > 10 to ≤ 22, low disease activity, CDAI > 2.8 to ≤ 10, and remission, CDAI ≤ 2.8 at Weeks 36 and 48;
Measured: baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36 and week 48
Treatment Period 2 :Proportion of Patients Achieving HAQ Index in Normal Range (≤ 0.5) at Weeks 36 and 48;
Measured: baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36, week 48
Treatment Period 2 :HAQ Index at Weeks 36 and 48;
HAQ: from 0 (best) to 3 (worst)
Measured: baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36, week 48
Treatment Period 2 : Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale Relative to Baseline at Weeks 36 and 48;
FACIT: from 0 (worst) to 52 (best), a score of less than 30 indicates severe fatigue
Measured: baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36, week 48
Treatment Period 2 : CRP Levels at Week 36 and 48
Measured: baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36, week 48
Treatment Period 2 : ESR Levels at Week 36 and 48
Measured: baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36, week 48
Safety - Overall Study : Frequency and Severity of Injection Site Reactions in GP2015 and Enbrel
Frequency of participants with injection site reactions in GP2015 and Enbrel
Measured: up to 48 weeks
Safety : Overall Study: Immunogenicity by Measuring the Rate of Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Positive Patients
To assess the immunogenicity of continuous GP2015 treatment versus a treatment transition from Enbrel to GP2015 after 24 weeks of treatment by measuring the rate of ADA positive participants at Weeks 24, 30, 36 and 48. summary of ADA positive data up to week 48 using a 1% false positive cut point
Measured: baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36, week 48
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Study start21 Feb 2015
- Primary completion29 Dec 2016
- Study completion12 Jun 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 376 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sandoz
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Arnd Schwebig, MD, Study director, Global Program Medical Director
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02638259
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GP15-301
- Acronym
- EQUIRA
- Status last verified
- Sep 2018
- First submitted
- 16 Dec 2015
- Last updated
- 19 Sep 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Via CSR
Publications
Thaci D, Gerdes S, Schulze-Koops H, Allanore Y, Kavanaugh A, Both C, Gattu S, Hachaichi S, Matucci-Cerinic M. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriasis, or Psoriatic Arthritis Treated with GP2015, an Etanercept Biosimilar: Results from Two Phase III Studies (EGALITY and EQUIRA). Drugs R D. 2025 Jun;25(2):107-115. doi: 10.1007/s40268-025-00507-8. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
PubMed 40279006Jaworski J, Matucci-Cerinic M, Schulze-Koops H, Buch MH, Kucharz EJ, Allanore Y, Kavanaugh A, Young P, Babic G. Switch from reference etanercept to SDZ ETN, an etanercept biosimilar, does not impact efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of etanercept in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis: 48-week results from the phase III, randomized, double-blind EQUIRA study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 May 28;21(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1907-x.
PubMed 31138316Matucci-Cerinic M, Allanore Y, Kavanaugh A, Buch MH, Schulze-Koops H, Kucharz EJ, Woehling H, Babic G, Poetzl J, Davis A, Schwebig A. Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of GP2015, an etanercept biosimilar, compared with the reference etanercept in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis: 24-week results from the comparative phase III, randomised, double-blind EQUIRA study. RMD Open. 2018 Nov 14;4(2):e000757. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000757. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 30487998
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Sep 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group Phase III Study to Demonstrate Equivalent Efficacy and to Compare Safety & Immunogenicity of GP2015 and Enbrel® (EU Authorized) in Patients With Moderate to Severe, Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02638259
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EQUIRA / GP15-301
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Keywords
- Biosimilars, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Etanercept
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 376 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- SandozIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 21 Feb 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Dec 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 12 Jun 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 23 Feb 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Demonstrate equivalent efficacy of GP2015 and EU-authorized Enbrel in patients with moderate to severe, active (RA) who had an inadequate response to disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) including methotrexate (MTX).
Detailed description
Demonstrate equivalent efficacy of GP2015 and EU-authorized Enbrel in patients with moderate to severe, active (RA) who had an inadequate response to disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) including methotrexate (MTX). In addition, data on the safety profiles of both products, including immunogenicity and local tolerability at the injection sites, will be collected and compared.
An additional study objective is to identify any potential risk of the transition from Enbrel to GP2015 in terms of general safety and immunogenicity in RA patients
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 50mg GP2015 | Experimental | Drug: GP2015Group 1 will receive treatment with 50mg GP2015 by subcutaneous injection every week up to 24 weeks (Treatment Period 1) after which patients achieving at least a moderate clinical response continue treatment with 50mg GP2015 subcutaneous injection every week up to 48 weeks (Treatment Period 2). |
| 50mg EU-authorized Enbrel | Active comparator | Drug: GP2015Group 2 will receive treatment with 50mg EU-authorized Enbrel by subcutaneous injection every week up to 24 weeks (Treatment Period 1) after which patients achieving at least a moderate clinical response will be switched to 50 mg GP2015 subcutaneous injection every week up to 48 weeks (Treatment Period 2). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients at least 18 years of age with RA diagnosis according to ACR 1987 or ACR/EULAR 20110 criteria >/= 6 months at the time of baseline visit
- Patient must have active disease defined as DAS28-CRP>/=3.2
- Patients must have CRP level above ULN >5mg/l) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) >/=28mm/h
- Patients must have inadequate clinical response to MTX at a dose of 10-25 mg/wk after proper dose escalation according to local standards
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Previous exposure to etanercept in the past
- Patients with functional status class IV according to the ACR 1991 revised criteria
- History of active tuberculosis (TB) or Presence of latent (inactive)TB detected by imaging and/or by the QuantiFERON-TB Gold test at screening
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| GP2015Enbrel comparator | Drug | 50mg EU-authorized Enbrel, 50mg GP2015 |
Primary outcome
Safety: Change in DAS28-CRP Score From Baseline to Week 24 in Patients Treated With GP2015 and Patients Treated With Enbrel
Time frame: treatment period 1: up to 24 weeks
Disease activity score (DAS) 28-CRP is based on 28-joint count (tender and swollen joints), C-reactive protein and patient's assessment of global disease activity, values range from 0.96 to 10.0 while higher values mean a higher disease activity. • A DAS28-CRP value >5.1 corresponds to a high disease activity • A DAS28-CRP value between 3.2 and 5.1 corresponds to a moderate disease activity • A DAS28-CRP value between 2.6 and 3.2 corresponds to a low disease activity • A DAS28-CRP value < 2.6 corresponds to remission DAS28-CRP = 0.56 * sqrt(tender28) + 0.28* sqrt(swollen28) + 0.36 * ln(CRP+1) + 0.014 * GDA + 0.96 where • tender28 and swollen28 are the number of tender and swollen joints as assessed using 28-joint count • CRP is C-reactive protein (mg/l) • GDA is the global disease activity measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 100 mm
32 secondary outcomes
Treatment Period 1: Frequency and Severity of Injection Site Reactions in GP2015 and Enbrel
Time frame: Treatment Period 1, up to 24 weeks
Treatment Period 1 - Safety : Immunogenicity by Measuring the Rate of Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Positive Patients
Time frame: baseline, week 2, week 4, week 12, week 24
Treatment Period 1- DAS28-CRP and DAS28-erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) Scores at Baseline and Weeks 4, 12 and 24;
Time frame: week 4, 12, 24
Treatment Period 1 - Changes From Baseline in DAS28-CRP and DAS-ESR Scores to Weeks 4, 12 and 24
Time frame: baseline, Week 4, week 12, week 24
Treatment Period 1- Proportion of Patients Achieving EULAR Response
Time frame: week 4, week 12 and week 24
Treatment Period 1- Proportion of Patients Achieving DAS28 < 2.6 at Weeks 4, 12 and 24
Time frame: week 4, week 12 and week 24
Treatment Period 1- Proportion of Patients Achieving EULAR/ACR Boolean Remission Criteria
Time frame: week 4, week 12, week 24
Treatment Period 1- Proportion of Patients Achieving ACR20/50/70 Response at Weeks 4, 12 and 24;
Time frame: Week 4, week 12 and week 24
Treatment Period 1- ACR-N Scores at Weeks 4, 12 and 24;
Time frame: Weeks 4, 12 and 24;
Treatment Period 1 - Proportion of Patients in Each Disease Activity Category as Defined by SDAI
Time frame: Weeks 4, 12 and 24;
Treatment Period 1 - Proportion of Patients in Each Disease Activity Category as Defined by CDAI
Time frame: Weeks 4, 12 and 24;
Treatment Period 1- Proportion of Patients Achieving HAQ Index in Normal Range (≤ 0.5) at Weeks 4, 12 and 24;
Time frame: Weeks 4, 12 and 24;
Treatment Period 1 - Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Index at Baseline, Weeks 4, 12 and 24;
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12 and 24;
Treatment Period 1 - Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale Relative to Baseline at Weeks 4, 12 and 24;
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12 and 24;
Treatment Period 1 - CRP Levels at Baseline and Weeks 4, 12 and 24
Time frame: Weeks 4, 12 and 24
Treatment Period 1 - ESR Levels at Baseline and Weeks 4, 12 and 24
Time frame: Weeks 4, 12 and 24
Treatment Period 2: DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR Scores up to Week 48;
Time frame: Baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36 and week 48.
Treatment Period 2 : Changes From Baseline in DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR Scores From Week 4 up to Week 48
Time frame: week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36, week 48
Treatment Period 2: Proportion of Patients Achieving EULAR Reponse
Time frame: week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36 and week 48
Treatment Period 2 : Proportion of Patients Achieving DAS28 < 2.6 at Weeks 36 and 48;
Time frame: week 36 and week 48
Treatment Period 2 : Proportion of Patients Achieving EULAR/ACR Boolean Remission Criteria
Time frame: week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36, week 48
Treatment Period 2 : Proportion of Patients Achieving ACR20/50/70 Response at Weeks 36 and 48;
Time frame: week 36 and week 48
Treatment Period 2 : ACR-N Scores at Weeks 36 and 48;
Time frame: week 36 and week 48
Treatment Period 2 : Proportion of Patients in Each Disease Activity Category as Defined by SDAI
Time frame: baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36. week 48
Treatment Period 2 : Proportion of Patients in Each Disease Activity Category as Defined by CDAI
Time frame: baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36 and week 48
Treatment Period 2 :Proportion of Patients Achieving HAQ Index in Normal Range (≤ 0.5) at Weeks 36 and 48;
Time frame: baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36, week 48
Treatment Period 2 :HAQ Index at Weeks 36 and 48;
Time frame: baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36, week 48
Treatment Period 2 : Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale Relative to Baseline at Weeks 36 and 48;
Time frame: baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36, week 48
Treatment Period 2 : CRP Levels at Week 36 and 48
Time frame: baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36, week 48
Treatment Period 2 : ESR Levels at Week 36 and 48
Time frame: baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36, week 48
Safety - Overall Study : Frequency and Severity of Injection Site Reactions in GP2015 and Enbrel
Time frame: up to 48 weeks
Safety : Overall Study: Immunogenicity by Measuring the Rate of Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Positive Patients
Time frame: baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36, week 48
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Sep 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40279006Thaci D, Gerdes S, Schulze-Koops H, Allanore Y, Kavanaugh A, Both C, Gattu S, Hachaichi S, Matucci-Cerinic M. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriasis, or Psoriatic Arthritis Treated with GP2015, an Etanercept Biosimilar: Results from Two Phase III Studies (EGALITY and EQUIRA). Drugs R D. 2025 Jun;25(2):107-115. doi: 10.1007/s40268-025-00507-8. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31138316Jaworski J, Matucci-Cerinic M, Schulze-Koops H, Buch MH, Kucharz EJ, Allanore Y, Kavanaugh A, Young P, Babic G. Switch from reference etanercept to SDZ ETN, an etanercept biosimilar, does not impact efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of etanercept in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis: 48-week results from the phase III, randomized, double-blind EQUIRA study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 May 28;21(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1907-x.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30487998Matucci-Cerinic M, Allanore Y, Kavanaugh A, Buch MH, Schulze-Koops H, Kucharz EJ, Woehling H, Babic G, Poetzl J, Davis A, Schwebig A. Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of GP2015, an etanercept biosimilar, compared with the reference etanercept in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis: 24-week results from the comparative phase III, randomised, double-blind EQUIRA study. RMD Open. 2018 Nov 14;4(2):e000757. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000757. eCollection 2018.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Via CSR
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Arnd Schwebig, MD study director
Global Program Medical Director
92 sites in 16 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing GP2015 in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Sandoz at 92 sites in 16 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 92 sites in United States, Poland, Russia, Czechia, Bulgaria and 11 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Feb 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Safety: Change in DAS28-CRP Score From Baseline to Week 24 in Patients Treated With GP2015 and Patients Treated With Enbrel (time frame: treatment period 1: up to 24 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02638259, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2018.