Rectal NeoplasmsPhase 2NCT02639403
Palliative Short-Course Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer
A Phase 2 study testing Conformal three-dimensional Radiotherapy in people with Rectal Neoplasms, run by IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna.
Trial summary
Radiotherapy (RT) is a potentially effective method in the treatment of symptoms of rectal carcinomas. Nevertheless, almost all the evidences about palliative RT in rectal cancer have been published more than two decades ago and were based on 2D conventional RT, which is nowadays no longer used. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Rectal Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- Conformal three-dimensional Radiotherapy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 18 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Oct 2003to Nov 2012
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- (i) rectal adenocarcinoma with obstructive symptoms not amenable for curative treatment due to synchronous metastases or patient inoperable due to age and/or comorbidities;
- (ii) symptoms of colorectal obstruction (progressive constipation with abdominal pain arising from less than 2 months, vomiting and/or diarrhea) and/or signs of obstruction at radiological examinations (presence of air-fluid levels or the presence of distended colon upstream neoplastic stenosis of the rectum);
- (iii) candidates for derivative colostomy;
- (iv) bi-dimensionally measurable disease;
- (v) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-3;
- (vi) able to provide a written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- (i) RT within 6 months in the same anatomical area before the initiation of study treatment;
- (ii) clinically detectable ascites;
- (iii) pregnancy
About this study
Official title: Palliative Short-Course Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Study
Radiotherapy (RT) is a potentially effective method in the treatment of symptoms of rectal carcinomas. Nevertheless, almost all the evidences about palliative RT in rectal cancer have been published more than two decades ago and were based on 2D conventional RT, which is nowadays no longer used. Consequently, prospective studies on the efficacy of 3D-RT in the management of symptomatic rectal cancer are still lacking. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the efficacy of palliative short-course 3D RT (SCRT) in patients with symptomatic obstructive rectal cancer.
Read the detailed description
Colorectal carcinoma is one of the cancers with higher incidence, although a progressive decrease in both incidence and mortality rates has been recently recorded in European countries. Rectal cancer may be diagnosed when the disease is at an advanced stage, causing obstructing symptoms. Colostomy represents a standard treatment option in these patients although it negatively impacts on quality of life. Consequently, alternative treatments have been proposed such as self-expandable metallic stent or thermal ablative treatments (i.e. laser or argon plasma coagulation endoscopic treatments), which are, however, not complication-free and not always feasible.
Radiotherapy (RT) is a potentially effective method in the treatment of symptoms of rectal carcinomas. Nevertheless, almost all the evidences about palliative RT in rectal cancer have been published more than two decades ago and were based on 2D conventional RT, which is nowadays no longer used. Consequently, prospective studies on the efficacy of 3D-RT in the management of symptomatic rectal cancer are still lacking.
The aim of this prospective study was to assess the efficacy of palliative short-course 3D RT (SCRT) in patients with symptomatic obstructive rectal cancer. This trial was a prospective Phase II study performed at the Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura "Giovanni Paolo II" in Campobasso (Italy).
Therapy Radiotherapy During the simulation process, patients were immobilized in prone position on an up-down table, a device aimed at reducing small-bowel irradiation. To limit the organ motion, patients were instructed to empty the bladder and drink 300 cm3 of water one hour before CT-simulation and before every daily treatment fraction. After oral administration of contrast medium to allow bowel localization, simulation CT images were taken in 5 mm increments over the region of interest. Delineation of the clinical target volume 1 (CTV1) included the gross tumor volume (GTV, both primary tumor and enlarged pelvic nodes) and the corresponding mesorectum plus 2 cm cranio-caudally. The planning target volume (PTV) was the CTV plus 0.8 cm margin in all directions. Organs at risk (OARs) were contoured as follows: 1) the small intestine was defined as all intestinal loops below the sacral promontory (recto-sigmoid junction excluded); 2) femoral heads were contoured from the cranial extremity to the level of the lower margin of ischial tuberosities; 3) the bladder was contoured entirely with no distinction between the wall and its content. Conformal three-dimensional RT was planned (3D-RT) using the Oncentra-Masterplan treatment planning system (Nucletron B.V., Veenendaal, Netherland). Short course RT (total, 25 Gy; 5 fraction in 5 days) was delivered with an isocentric four-field box technique. Dose was specified according to the ICRU Report 62. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were calculated for the PTV and OARs and the QUANTEC constraints were followed. Radiotherapy was delivered by 10-15 MV photon energy. The beams were delivered by an Elekta Precise Linac (Elekta Oncology Systems, Crawley, UK) equipped with standard multi leaf collimators (MLC). A daily online correction protocol of isocenter position was applied using portal imaging, with set-up correction in case of deviations > 0.5 cm in any direction. All stages of the treatment planning process were subjected to a systematic independent check procedure, as previously described. In patients with grade 3-4 toxicity, RT was suspended and treatment was resumed after recovery from toxicity in the degree ≤ 2.
Chemotherapy Use of chemotherapy was allowed based on the referring physician preferences, comorbidities and age. Chemotherapy was discontinued during RT, one week before and after the delivery of RT.
Statistical Analysis Primary end-point of the present study was the rate of complete response (CR) of obstructive symptoms following radiation treatment. According to the Simon's optimal design, the study required the enrollment of 9+8 patients in order to detect a significant rate of CR of obstructive symptoms (error probability limits: alpha 0.05; beta 0.2). In case of no detection of CR of obstructive symptoms in the first 9 enrolled patients, the interruption of enrollment and the closure of the study were planned. In case of detection of at least 1 CR of obstructive symptoms the study design required the recruitment of at least 8 additional patients for the final evaluation of symptoms response rate. To account for a possible non-participation rate of 5%, we increased the sample size of the second stage to nine subjects. Continuous variables were reported as median with range. Categorical variables were reported as proportion and percentage. The survival curves were computed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS v. 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, US) and Stata 14.1 SE (Stata corporation, College Station, TX, US)
- Conditions
- Rectal Neoplasms
- Being tested
- Conformal three-dimensional Radiotherapy
- Keywords
- Rectal cancer, Radiotherapy, Occlusion
- Medical subject headings
- Rectal Neoplasms, Bites and Stings
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Conformal three-dimensional RadiotherapyRadiation
Conformal three-dimensional RT was planned (3D-RT) using the Oncentra-Masterplan treatment planning system (Nucletron B.V., Veenendaal, Netherland). Short course RT (total, 25 Gy; 5 fraction in 5 days) will be delivered with an isocentric four-field box technique.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| RT for Obstructing Rectal Cancer | Experimental | Conformal three-dimensional RT was planned (3D-RT) in patients with obstructing rectal cancer not amenable for curative resection Receives: Radiation: Conformal three-dimensional Radiotherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change of the obstructive symptoms
Measured: Clinical evaluation was performed before commencement of RT, 4 weeks after the end of treatment and every 6 months until the established length of follow up (3 years) or death.
Secondary outcomes (5)
Change of the overall symptoms
Measured: Before commencement of RT, 4 weeks after the end of treatment and every 6 months until the established length of follow up (3 years) or death.
Change of the tumor mass volume
Measured: Before commencement of RT, 4 weeks after the end of treatment and every 6 months until the established length of follow up (3 years) or death.
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria v4.0
Measured: Before commencement of RT, 4 weeks after the end of treatment and every 6 months until the established length of follow up (3 years) or death.
Overall survival
Measured: At the end of follow-up (3 years after RT) or until death of patient
Obstruction/colostomy-free survival
Measured: At the end of follow-up (3 years after RT) or until death of patient
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2003
- Primary completionNov 2012
- Study completionNov 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Rectal NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di BolognaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Lorenzo Fuccio, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
- Investigators
- Alessio G Morganti, Professor, Study director, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02639403
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 001
- Status last verified
- Dec 2015
- First submitted
- 18 Dec 2015
- Last updated
- 24 Dec 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Dec 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Palliative Short-Course Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02639403
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 001
- Conditions
- Rectal Neoplasms
- Keywords
- Rectal cancer, Radiotherapy, Occlusion
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di BolognaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2003
- Primary completion
- Nov 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Radiotherapy (RT) is a potentially effective method in the treatment of symptoms of rectal carcinomas. Nevertheless, almost all the evidences about palliative RT in rectal cancer have been published more than two decades ago and were based on 2D conventional RT, which is nowadays no longer used. Consequently, prospective studies on the efficacy of 3D-RT in the management of symptomatic rectal cancer are still lacking. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the efficacy of palliative short-course 3D RT (SCRT) in patients with symptomatic obstructive rectal cancer.
Detailed description
Colorectal carcinoma is one of the cancers with higher incidence, although a progressive decrease in both incidence and mortality rates has been recently recorded in European countries. Rectal cancer may be diagnosed when the disease is at an advanced stage, causing obstructing symptoms. Colostomy represents a standard treatment option in these patients although it negatively impacts on quality of life. Consequently, alternative treatments have been proposed such as self-expandable metallic stent or thermal ablative treatments (i.e. laser or argon plasma coagulation endoscopic treatments), which are, however, not complication-free and not always feasible.
Radiotherapy (RT) is a potentially effective method in the treatment of symptoms of rectal carcinomas. Nevertheless, almost all the evidences about palliative RT in rectal cancer have been published more than two decades ago and were based on 2D conventional RT, which is nowadays no longer used. Consequently, prospective studies on the efficacy of 3D-RT in the management of symptomatic rectal cancer are still lacking.
The aim of this prospective study was to assess the efficacy of palliative short-course 3D RT (SCRT) in patients with symptomatic obstructive rectal cancer. This trial was a prospective Phase II study performed at the Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura "Giovanni Paolo II" in Campobasso (Italy).
Therapy Radiotherapy During the simulation process, patients were immobilized in prone position on an up-down table, a device aimed at reducing small-bowel irradiation. To limit the organ motion, patients were instructed to empty the bladder and drink 300 cm3 of water one hour before CT-simulation and before every daily treatment fraction. After oral administration of contrast medium to allow bowel localization, simulation CT images were taken in 5 mm increments over the region of interest. Delineation of the clinical target volume 1 (CTV1) included the gross tumor volume (GTV, both primary tumor and enlarged pelvic nodes) and the corresponding mesorectum plus 2 cm cranio-caudally. The planning target volume (PTV) was the CTV plus 0.8 cm margin in all directions. Organs at risk (OARs) were contoured as follows: 1) the small intestine was defined as all intestinal loops below the sacral promontory (recto-sigmoid junction excluded); 2) femoral heads were contoured from the cranial extremity to the level of the lower margin of ischial tuberosities; 3) the bladder was contoured entirely with no distinction between the wall and its content. Conformal three-dimensional RT was planned (3D-RT) using the Oncentra-Masterplan treatment planning system (Nucletron B.V., Veenendaal, Netherland). Short course RT (total, 25 Gy; 5 fraction in 5 days) was delivered with an isocentric four-field box technique. Dose was specified according to the ICRU Report 62. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were calculated for the PTV and OARs and the QUANTEC constraints were followed. Radiotherapy was delivered by 10-15 MV photon energy. The beams were delivered by an Elekta Precise Linac (Elekta Oncology Systems, Crawley, UK) equipped with standard multi leaf collimators (MLC). A daily online correction protocol of isocenter position was applied using portal imaging, with set-up correction in case of deviations > 0.5 cm in any direction. All stages of the treatment planning process were subjected to a systematic independent check procedure, as previously described. In patients with grade 3-4 toxicity, RT was suspended and treatment was resumed after recovery from toxicity in the degree ≤ 2.
Chemotherapy Use of chemotherapy was allowed based on the referring physician preferences, comorbidities and age. Chemotherapy was discontinued during RT, one week before and after the delivery of RT.
Statistical Analysis Primary end-point of the present study was the rate of complete response (CR) of obstructive symptoms following radiation treatment. According to the Simon's optimal design, the study required the enrollment of 9+8 patients in order to detect a significant rate of CR of obstructive symptoms (error probability limits: alpha 0.05; beta 0.2). In case of no detection of CR of obstructive symptoms in the first 9 enrolled patients, the interruption of enrollment and the closure of the study were planned. In case of detection of at least 1 CR of obstructive symptoms the study design required the recruitment of at least 8 additional patients for the final evaluation of symptoms response rate. To account for a possible non-participation rate of 5%, we increased the sample size of the second stage to nine subjects. Continuous variables were reported as median with range. Categorical variables were reported as proportion and percentage. The survival curves were computed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS v. 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, US) and Stata 14.1 SE (Stata corporation, College Station, TX, US)
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| RT for Obstructing Rectal Cancer | Experimental | Radiation: Conformal three-dimensional RadiotherapyConformal three-dimensional RT was planned (3D-RT) in patients with obstructing rectal cancer not amenable for curative resection |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- (i) rectal adenocarcinoma with obstructive symptoms not amenable for curative treatment due to synchronous metastases or patient inoperable due to age and/or comorbidities;
- (ii) symptoms of colorectal obstruction (progressive constipation with abdominal pain arising from less than 2 months, vomiting and/or diarrhea) and/or signs of obstruction at radiological examinations (presence of air-fluid levels or the presence of distended colon upstream neoplastic stenosis of the rectum);
- (iii) candidates for derivative colostomy;
- (iv) bi-dimensionally measurable disease;
- (v) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-3;
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- (i) RT within 6 months in the same anatomical area before the initiation of study treatment;
- (ii) clinically detectable ascites;
- (iii) pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Conformal three-dimensional RadiotherapyConformal three-dimensional RT was planned (3D-RT) using the Oncentra-Masterplan treatment planning system (Nucletron B.V., Veenendaal, Netherland). Short course RT (total, 25 Gy; 5 fraction in 5 days) will be delivered with an isocentric four-field box technique. | Radiation | RT for Obstructing Rectal Cancer |
Primary outcome
Change of the obstructive symptoms
Time frame: Clinical evaluation was performed before commencement of RT, 4 weeks after the end of treatment and every 6 months until the established length of follow up (3 years) or death.
5 secondary outcomes
Change of the overall symptoms
Time frame: Before commencement of RT, 4 weeks after the end of treatment and every 6 months until the established length of follow up (3 years) or death.
Change of the tumor mass volume
Time frame: Before commencement of RT, 4 weeks after the end of treatment and every 6 months until the established length of follow up (3 years) or death.
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria v4.0
Time frame: Before commencement of RT, 4 weeks after the end of treatment and every 6 months until the established length of follow up (3 years) or death.
Overall survival
Time frame: At the end of follow-up (3 years after RT) or until death of patient
Obstruction/colostomy-free survival
Time frame: At the end of follow-up (3 years after RT) or until death of patient
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Dec 2015.
Related trials for Rectal Neoplasms
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alessio G Morganti, Professor study director
Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Conformal three-dimensional Radiotherapy in people with Rectal Neoplasms, run by IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Dec 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change of the obstructive symptoms (time frame: Clinical evaluation was performed before commencement of RT, 4 weeks after the end of treatment and every 6 months until the established length of follow up (3 years) or death.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Dec 2015.