Parkinson's DiseasePhase 3SURE-PD3NCT02642393
Study of Urate Elevation in Parkinson's Disease, Phase 3
A Phase 3 study testing Inosine in people with Parkinson's Disease, run by Michael Alan Schwarzschild at 62 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial to determine whether oral inosine dosed to moderately elevate serum urate (from ≤5.7 mg/dL to 7.1-8.0 mg/dL) over 2 years slows clinical decline in early PD. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Parkinson's Disease
- What is being tested?
- Inosine
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 298 participants
- Where
- 62 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Jun 2016to Jun 2019
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Study subjects meeting all of the following criteria will be allowed to enroll in the study:
- Willingness and ability to give written informed consent and to comply with trial procedures.
- Fulfillment of diagnostic criteria for idiopathic PD with at least two of the cardinal signs of PD (resting tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity) present at 2nd screening and baseline evaluations, as assessed by the Site Investigator.
- Absence of current or imminent (within 90 days of enrollment) PD disability requiring dopaminergic therapy, as assessed by the Site Investigator.
- Modified Hoehn and Yahr Scale Stage 1 to 2.5 inclusive.
- Age 30 or older at the time of PD diagnosis.
Show all 14Show fewer
- Diagnosis of PD made within 3 years prior to 1st Screening Visit.
- Non-fasting serum urate ≤ 5.7 mg/dL at 1st Screening Visit (SC1).
- If the subject is female, then:
- Being surgically sterile (hysterectomy or tubal ligation), or
- Being postmenopausal (last menstruation was two years or more prior to 2nd Screening Visit), or
- For those of childbearing potential
- Using a reliable form of contraception for 60 days or more prior to Baseline Visit and agreeing to continue such use for 30 days post last dose of study drug. Reliable forms of contraception include: abstinence; implanted, injected or oral contraceptives (birth control pills), intrauterine device in place for at least 3 months prior to Baseline Visit, vaginal ring with spermicide, barrier with spermicide such as male or female condom, diaphragm or cervical cap, transdermal patch; male partner with vasectomy.
- And having a negative pregnancy test at the 2nd Screening Visit. [Note that a urine pregnancy test will be performed at screening on all women who are not at least two years postmenopausal or surgically sterile.]
Who cannot join
- Study subjects meeting any of the following criteria during screening evaluations will be excluded from entry into the study:
- Atypical parkinsonism, including that due to drugs, metabolic disorders, encephalitis, cerebrovascular disease, normal pressure hydrocephalus, or other neurodegenerative disease.
- Dopamine transporter (DAT) brain scan without evidence of dopamine deficit.
- History of gout.
- History of uric acid or urate urolithiasis, or recurrent urolithiasis all of unknown type.
- A screening test positive for uric acid crystalluria, urine pH ≤ 5.0, or an estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2.
Show all 20Show fewer
- History of myocardial infarction or stroke.
- Symptomatic congestive heart failure with a documented ejection fraction below 45%.
- History of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
- Mini Mental State Exam score < 25; i.e., a score of 0 to 24.
- Use of any anti-parkinsonian medication (including levodopa, dopamine agonists, amantadine, entacapone and the anticholinergic agents trihexyphenidyl and benztropine) other than monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors within 60 days of Baseline, or in excess of 90 days.
- Change in the dosage of (or initiation of) a monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B) inhibitor within 90 days prior to Baseline, i.e., entry on a MAO-B inhibitor requires a stable dosage for the 90 days prior to Baseline.
- Use of the following within 30 days prior to the Baseline Visit: inosine, allopurinol, febuxostat, probenecid, more than 50 IU of vitamin E daily, or more than 300 mg of vitamin C daily (though a daily standard multivitamin such as Bayer One-A-Day® or Centrum® is permissible), reserpine, methylphenidate, amphetamines, cinnarizine, monoamine oxidase-A inhibitors, tetrabenazine, neuroleptics or other dopamine blocking drugs.
- Use of the following within 90 days prior to the DAT neuroimaging screening evaluation: modafinil, armodafinil, metoclopramide, alpha-methyldopa, methylphenidate, reserpine, or amphetamine derivative.
- Unstable dosing of a thiazide -- such as hydrochlorothiazide (e.g., Esidrex), chlorothiazide (e.g., Diuril), chlorthalidone (e.g., Hygroton), indapamide (e.g., Lozol), metolazone (e.g., Zaroxolyn), which are permissible as long as the subject is on a stable dose from 1 week prior to the 1st Screening Visit through the Baseline Visit.
- Known unstable medical or psychiatric condition that may compromise participation in the study. (Note that difficulty swallowing large capsules might preclude participation due to the size of the study drug capsules.)
- Clinically serious abnormality in the screening visit laboratory studies or ECG, as determined by the Site Investigator.
- Participation in another investigational treatment study within 30 days prior to the Baseline Visit.
- Known hypersensitivity or intolerability to inosine.
- Known hypersensitivity to DaTscan (either the active substance of ioflupane I-123 or to any of the excipients).
Trial locations and contacts
62 sites in 2 countries.
62 sites in 2 countries
United States61 sites
Albany Medical College
Albany, New York, 12208
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30329
Augusta University
Augusta, Georgia, 30912
University of Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Boston University Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
SUNY Downstate Medical Center
Brooklyn, New York, 11203
The University of Vermont
Burlington, Vermont, 05405
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29403
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
University of Cincinnati/Cincinnati Children's Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43221
Wesley Neurology Clinic, PC
Cordova, Tennessee, 38018
UT Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390-9036
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, 27705
Michigan State University
East Lansing, Michigan, 48824
Rocky Mountain Movement Disorder Center
Englewood, Colorado, 80113
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, 77030
University of Texas Houston Medical School
Houston, Texas, 77030
Indiana University
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
University of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160
University of California San Diego
La Jolla, California, 92093
Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, 90033
University of Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Memphis, Tennessee, 38163
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
Oschner Clinic Foundation
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121
Weill Cornell Medical Center
New York, New York, 10021
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, 68198
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Barrow Neurological Institute
Phoenix, Arizona, 85013
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Oregon Health & Sciences University
Portland, Oregon, 97239
Butler Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02906
VCU Parkinson's & Movement Disorder Center (McGuire Veterans Hospital)
Richmond, Virginia, 23230
University of California Davis
Sacramento, California, 95817
University of California San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143
Mayo Clinic Arizona
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259
Inland Northwest Research
Spokane, Washington, 99202
Northwest Neurological PLLC
Spokane, Washington, 99202
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Overlook Medical Center, Atlantic Neuroscience Institute
Summit, New Jersey, 07901
Banner Sun Health Research Institute
Sun City, Arizona, 85351
SUNY Upstate Medical University
Syracuse, New York, 13210
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, 33613
Baylor Scott & White Health
Temple, Texas, 76508
Hartford HealthCare Movement Disorders Center
Vernon, Connecticut, 06066
Sentara Neurology Specialists
Virginia Beach, Virginia, 23456
Henry Ford Health System
West Bloomfield, Michigan, 48322
Neurosciences Institute at Central DuPage Hospital
Winfield, Illinois, 60190
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of Urate-elevating Inosine Treatment to Slow Clinical Decline in Early Parkinson's Disease
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial to determine whether oral inosine dosed to moderately elevate serum urate (from ≤5.7 mg/dL to 7.1-8.0 mg/dL) over 2 years slows clinical decline in early PD.
Clinical decline will be assessed as change in the primary outcome variable of the Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), a composite scale comprising patient- and clinician-reported outcomes.
Read the detailed description
Capsules containing 500 mg of inosine (active drug) or ~500 mg of lactose (placebo) will be taken orally up to two capsules three times per day (i.e., up to 3 g/day) for 24 months. In the inosine-treated group the number of capsules taken per day will be titrated to serum urate levels - measured at trough at study visits no more than three months apart - in order to achieve concentrations of 7.1-8.0 mg/dL. Initial dosing will be tailored to individualized factors including gender and pretreatment serum urate, and then advanced gradually toward the projected target dose. Adjustments in dosing of placebo capsules in the control arm will be algorithm-based to match dosing of inosine capsules in the active drug arm.
Following study drug discontinuation all subjects will be followed during a 3-month wash-out period by telephone calls and a final study visit. All study visits after screening will include measurement of the primary outcome variable (MDS-UPDRS) and most will include secondary outcome variables: adverse events, dose adjustments, disability warranting initiation of dopaminergic therapy, Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL), 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39), Schwab \& England Activities of Daily Living (S\&E ADL) scale, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and orthostatic vital signs.
- Conditions
- Parkinson's Disease
- Being tested
- Inosine, Placebo
- Keywords
- SURE-PD3, Parkinson's disease, PD, Inosine, Urate, Parkinson Study Group (PSG)
- Medical subject headings
- Parkinson Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
InosineDrug
Also called hypoxanthine 9-β-D-ribofuranoside
capsules containing 500 mg of inosine
PlaceboDrug
Also called inactive agent
capsules containing ~500 mg of lactose and appearing indistinguishable from inosine capsules
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Inosine | Experimental | Inosine will be dosed by titrating the number of capsules taken daily to achieve an elevation of serum urate to trough levels of 7.1 to 8.0 mg/dL. Receives: Drug: Inosine |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo will be dosed to match the capsule titrations of the inosine group. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rate of Clinical Decline
The primary outcome of the trial is rate of change in the Movement Disorders Society Unified PD Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) I-III total score over 24 months estimated from a shared-baseline, random-slopes mixed model, censoring follow-up of subjects after initiation of dopaminergic therapy. Parts I-III of the MDS-UPDRS include ratings of non-motor experiences of daily living, motor experiences of daily living, and a motor examination. The MDS-UPDRS is assessed on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 4 where higher scores imply worse symptoms. Parts I-III contain 59 total questions (13 in Part I, 13 in Part II, and 33 in Part III). Total scores for Parts I-III are calculated as simple sums of component items with mean imputation by Part if no more than 1, 2, or 7 items are missing for Parts I through III, respectively. Total scores may range from 0 to 236, with 0 meaning no symptoms and 236 meaning worse symptoms.
Measured: two years
Secondary outcomes (10)
Rate of Developing Adverse Effects
Safety also will be evaluated by comparing active vs. placebo treatment with respect to overall adverse event (AE) and serious AE (SAE) rate.
Measured: two years
Percentage Developing Adverse Effects
Safety of oral inosine titrated to elevate trough serum urate to 7.1 - 8.0 mg/dL will be evaluated by comparing active vs. placebo treatment with respect to the percentage of subjects experiencing individual types of AE, as classified by Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) preferred term and system organ class.
Measured: two years
Percentage of Subjects Tolerant of the Treatment
Tolerability of a treatment will be defined as a percentage of all subjects in a treatment group who are tolerant of the treatment at 12 weeks (short-term tolerability) and 24 months (long-term tolerability). A subject who is tolerant of treatment will be defined as one who remains on-study and on the assigned treatment without one or more dose reductions lasting more than 4 weeks cumulative due to AEs. A treatment will be declared tolerable if the percentage who are tolerant is significantly greater than 50% by one-tailed testing at p < 0.05.
Measured: three months; two years
Percentage of Participants Developing Disability Warranting Dopaminergic Therapy Over Time
The percentage of participants with disability warranting the initiation of dopaminergic therapy in each treatment group at time from baseline visit (in 180 day increments).
Measured: two years
Clinical Efficacy: Rate of Change in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire - 39 Item Version (PDQ-39) Scale
Rate of change in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire - 39 item version (PDQ-39) scale points (over the time between baseline visit and final visit on study drug) will be assessed for subjects in each treatment group. The PDQ-39 asks 39 questions organized over eight domains (scales): mobility (10 items), activities of daily living (6 items), emotional well-being (6 items), stigma (4 items), social support (3 items), cognition (4 items), communication (3 items), and bodily discomfort (3 items). Each item has five possible ordinal responses, from never to always, depending on frequency of the symptom over the preceding month. The eight scales' scores are generated by Likert's method of summated ratings and then transformed to a single figure that ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores are associated with more symptoms.
Measured: two years
Clinical Efficacy: Rate of Change in Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL)
Rate of change in Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) scale points (over the time between baseline visit and final visit on study drug) will be assessed for subjects in each treatment group. Neuro-QOL is a set of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures that assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of people with neurological disorders. It comprises 17 domains of HRQL covering physical, psychological and social health. Domains tested include anxiety, cognitive function, communication, depression, emotional and behavioral dyscontrol, fatigue, lower extremity function- mobility, positive affect and well- being, stigma, upper extremity function- fine motor and ADL, sleep disturbance, satisfaction with social roles and activities, and ability to participate in social roles and activities. Higher raw scores are associated with more of the concept being measured. All scales range from 8 to 40 except for Positive Affect and Well-Being which ranges from 9 to 45.
Measured: two years
Clinical Efficacy: Rate of Change in Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Depression Module
Rate of change in Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) depression module scale points (over the time between baseline visit and final visit on study drug) will be assessed for subjects in each treatment group. Neuro-QOL is a set of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures that assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of people with neurological disorders. Higher raw scores are associated with more of the concept being measured. The depression module score ranges from 8 to 40.
Measured: two years
Clinical Efficacy: Rate of Change in Schwab and England Scale
Rate of change in percentage points on the Schwab and England scale for functional disability (over the time between baseline visit and final visit on study drug) will be assessed for subjects in each treatment group. The Schwab and England scale is a Site Investigator and subject assessment of the subject's level of independence. The subject will be scored on a percentage scale reflective of his/her ability to perform acts of daily living. Printed scores with associated descriptors range from 0% to 100% in increments of 5%, with higher percentages associated with more independence. A score of 0% implies "vegetative functions such as swallowing, bladder and bowel functions are not functioning; bedridden". A score of 100% implies "subject has full ability and is completely independent; essentially normal".
Measured: two years
Clinical Efficacy: Rate of Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Rate of change in points on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scale (for cognition; over the time between baseline visit and final visit on study drug) will be assessed for subjects in each treatment group. The MoCA assesses attention and concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation. Points are awarded for the correct completion of MoCA tasks. Scores for each task are summed for a total score (range 0-30). Higher scores indicate greater cognitive capacity.
Measured: two years
Symptomatic Effects
Symptomatic effects will be estimated by changes in motor and other features (e.g., as assessed by short-term change in Movement Disorders Society Unified PD Rating Scale [MDS-UPDRS] I-III total score) during the first 3 months of wash-in at the start of period 1 and during the 3-month wash-out of period 2. The MDS-UPDRS includes ratings of non-motor experiences of daily living, motor experiences of daily living, and a motor examination. The MDS-UPDRS is assessed on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 4 where higher scores imply worse features. Parts I-III contain 59 total questions (13 in Part I, 13 in Part II, and 33 in Part III). Total scores are calculated as simple sums of component items with mean imputation by Part if no more than 1, 2, or 7 items are missing for Parts I through III, respectively. Total scores may range from 0 to 236, with 0 meaning no symptoms and 236 meaning worse symptoms.
Measured: three months (after both initiation and discontinuation of study drug)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2016
- Primary completionJun 2019
- Study completionJun 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Parkinson's DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 298 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Michael Alan Schwarzschild
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Parkinson Study Group, Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research, University of Rochester, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Michael Alan Schwarzschild, Massachusetts General Hospital
- Investigators
- Michael A Schwarzschild, MD, PhD, Study chair, Massachusetts General Hospital (PI of Clinical Coordinating Center), PSG (Chair, SURE-PD3 Steering Committee)Alberto Ascherio, MD, DrPH, Study director, Harvard School of Public Health, PSG (Co-Chair, SURE-PD3 Steering Committee)David Oakes, PhD, Study director, University of Rochester (PI of Data Coordinating Center), PSG (Study Statistician/Member, SURE-PD3 Steering Committee)Eric A Macklin, PhD, Study director, Massachusetts General Hospital, PSG (Study Statistician/Member, SURE-PD3 Steering Committee)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02642393
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- INO-PD-P3-2014
- Other IDs
- 1U01NS090259-01A1
- Acronym
- SURE-PD3
- Status last verified
- Jul 2020
- First submitted
- 19 Dec 2015
- Last updated
- 28 Jul 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified data; per policies of NIH/NINDS and the PSG (Parkinson Study Group)
Publications
Parkinson Study Group SURE-PD Investigators; Schwarzschild MA, Ascherio A, Beal MF, Cudkowicz ME, Curhan GC, Hare JM, Hooper DC, Kieburtz KD, Macklin EA, Oakes D, Rudolph A, Shoulson I, Tennis MK, Espay AJ, Gartner M, Hung A, Bwala G, Lenehan R, Encarnacion E, Ainslie M, Castillo R, Togasaki D, Barles G, Friedman JH, Niles L, Carter JH, Murray M, Goetz CG, Jaglin J, Ahmed A, Russell DS, Cotto C, Goudreau JL, Russell D, Parashos SA, Ede P, Saint-Hilaire MH, Thomas CA, James R, Stacy MA, Johnson J, Gauger L, Antonelle de Marcaida J, Thurlow S, Isaacson SH, Carvajal L, Rao J, Cook M, Hope-Porche C, McClurg L, Grasso DL, Logan R, Orme C, Ross T, Brocht AF, Constantinescu R, Sharma S, Venuto C, Weber J, Eaton K. Inosine to increase serum and cerebrospinal fluid urate in Parkinson disease: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2014 Feb;71(2):141-50. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.5528.
PubMed 24366103Di Luca DG, Macklin EA, Hodgeman K, Lopez G, Pothier L, Callahan KF, Lowell J, Chan J, Videnovic A, Lungu C, Lang AE, Litvan I, Schwarzschild MA, Simuni T. Enrollment of Participants From Marginalized Racial and Ethnic Groups: A Comparative Assessment of the STEADY-PD III and SURE-PD3 Trials. Neurol Clin Pract. 2023 Feb;13(1):e200113. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200113. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
PubMed 36865634Parkinson Study Group SURE-PD3 Investigators; Schwarzschild MA, Ascherio A, Casaceli C, Curhan GC, Fitzgerald R, Kamp C, Lungu C, Macklin EA, Marek K, Mozaffarian D, Oakes D, Rudolph A, Shoulson I, Videnovic A, Scott B, Gauger L, Aldred J, Bixby M, Ciccarello J, Gunzler SA, Henchcliffe C, Brodsky M, Keith K, Hauser RA, Goetz C, LeDoux MS, Hinson V, Kumar R, Espay AJ, Jimenez-Shahed J, Hunter C, Christine C, Daley A, Leehey M, de Marcaida JA, Friedman JH, Hung A, Bwala G, Litvan I, Simon DK, Simuni T, Poon C, Schiess MC, Chou K, Park A, Bhatti D, Peterson C, Criswell SR, Rosenthal L, Durphy J, Shill HA, Mehta SH, Ahmed A, Deik AF, Fang JY, Stover N, Zhang L, Dewey RB Jr, Gerald A, Boyd JT, Houston E, Suski V, Mosovsky S, Cloud L, Shah BB, Saint-Hilaire M, James R, Zauber SE, Reich S, Shprecher D, Pahwa R, Langhammer A, LaFaver K, LeWitt PA, Kaminski P, Goudreau J, Russell D, Houghton DJ, Laroche A, Thomas K, McGraw M, Mari Z, Serrano C, Blindauer K, Rabin M, Kurlan R, Morgan JC, Soileau M, Ainslie M, Bodis-Wollner I, Schneider RB, Waters C, Ratel AS, Beck CA, Bolger P, Callahan KF, Crotty GF, Klements D, Kostrzebski M, McMahon GM, Pothier L, Waikar SS, Lang A, Mestre T. Effect of Urate-Elevating Inosine on Early Parkinson Disease Progression: The SURE-PD3 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 Sep 14;326(10):926-939. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.10207.
PubMed 34519802Mestre TA, Macklin EA, Ascherio A, Ferreira JJ, Lang AE, Schwarzschild MA; Parkinson Study Group SURE-PD3 Investigators. Expectations of Benefit in a Trial of a Candidate Disease-Modifying Treatment for Parkinson Disease. Mov Disord. 2021 Aug;36(8):1964-1967. doi: 10.1002/mds.28630. Epub 2021 May 4.
PubMed 33942376
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jul 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of Urate-elevating Inosine Treatment to Slow Clinical Decline in Early Parkinson's Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02642393
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SURE-PD3 / INO-PD-P3-2014
- Conditions
- Parkinson's Disease
- Keywords
- SURE-PD3, Parkinson's disease, PD, Inosine, Urate, Parkinson Study Group (PSG)
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 298 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Michael Alan SchwarzschildUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Parkinson Study Group, Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research, University of Rochester, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
- Study start
- Jun 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 28 Jul 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial to determine whether oral inosine dosed to moderately elevate serum urate (from ≤5.7 mg/dL to 7.1-8.0 mg/dL) over 2 years slows clinical decline in early PD.
Clinical decline will be assessed as change in the primary outcome variable of the Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), a composite scale comprising patient- and clinician-reported outcomes.
Detailed description
Capsules containing 500 mg of inosine (active drug) or ~500 mg of lactose (placebo) will be taken orally up to two capsules three times per day (i.e., up to 3 g/day) for 24 months. In the inosine-treated group the number of capsules taken per day will be titrated to serum urate levels - measured at trough at study visits no more than three months apart - in order to achieve concentrations of 7.1-8.0 mg/dL. Initial dosing will be tailored to individualized factors including gender and pretreatment serum urate, and then advanced gradually toward the projected target dose. Adjustments in dosing of placebo capsules in the control arm will be algorithm-based to match dosing of inosine capsules in the active drug arm.
Following study drug discontinuation all subjects will be followed during a 3-month wash-out period by telephone calls and a final study visit. All study visits after screening will include measurement of the primary outcome variable (MDS-UPDRS) and most will include secondary outcome variables: adverse events, dose adjustments, disability warranting initiation of dopaminergic therapy, Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL), 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39), Schwab \& England Activities of Daily Living (S\&E ADL) scale, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and orthostatic vital signs.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Inosine | Experimental | Drug: InosineInosine will be dosed by titrating the number of capsules taken daily to achieve an elevation of serum urate to trough levels of 7.1 to 8.0 mg/dL. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboPlacebo will be dosed to match the capsule titrations of the inosine group. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Study subjects meeting all of the following criteria will be allowed to enroll in the study:
- Willingness and ability to give written informed consent and to comply with trial procedures.
- Fulfillment of diagnostic criteria for idiopathic PD with at least two of the cardinal signs of PD (resting tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity) present at 2nd screening and baseline evaluations, as assessed by the Site Investigator.
- Absence of current or imminent (within 90 days of enrollment) PD disability requiring dopaminergic therapy, as assessed by the Site Investigator.
- Modified Hoehn and Yahr Scale Stage 1 to 2.5 inclusive.
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Study subjects meeting any of the following criteria during screening evaluations will be excluded from entry into the study:
- Atypical parkinsonism, including that due to drugs, metabolic disorders, encephalitis, cerebrovascular disease, normal pressure hydrocephalus, or other neurodegenerative disease.
- Dopamine transporter (DAT) brain scan without evidence of dopamine deficit.
- History of gout.
- History of uric acid or urate urolithiasis, or recurrent urolithiasis all of unknown type.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| InosineAlso: hypoxanthine 9-β-D-ribofuranosidecapsules containing 500 mg of inosine | Drug | Inosine |
| PlaceboAlso: inactive agentcapsules containing ~500 mg of lactose and appearing indistinguishable from inosine capsules | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Rate of Clinical Decline
Time frame: two years
The primary outcome of the trial is rate of change in the Movement Disorders Society Unified PD Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) I-III total score over 24 months estimated from a shared-baseline, random-slopes mixed model, censoring follow-up of subjects after initiation of dopaminergic therapy. Parts I-III of the MDS-UPDRS include ratings of non-motor experiences of daily living, motor experiences of daily living, and a motor examination. The MDS-UPDRS is assessed on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 4 where higher scores imply worse symptoms. Parts I-III contain 59 total questions (13 in Part I, 13 in Part II, and 33 in Part III). Total scores for Parts I-III are calculated as simple sums of component items with mean imputation by Part if no more than 1, 2, or 7 items are missing for Parts I through III, respectively. Total scores may range from 0 to 236, with 0 meaning no symptoms and 236 meaning worse symptoms.
10 secondary outcomes
Rate of Developing Adverse Effects
Time frame: two years
Percentage Developing Adverse Effects
Time frame: two years
Percentage of Subjects Tolerant of the Treatment
Time frame: three months; two years
Percentage of Participants Developing Disability Warranting Dopaminergic Therapy Over Time
Time frame: two years
Clinical Efficacy: Rate of Change in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire - 39 Item Version (PDQ-39) Scale
Time frame: two years
Clinical Efficacy: Rate of Change in Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL)
Time frame: two years
Clinical Efficacy: Rate of Change in Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Depression Module
Time frame: two years
Clinical Efficacy: Rate of Change in Schwab and England Scale
Time frame: two years
Clinical Efficacy: Rate of Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time frame: two years
Symptomatic Effects
Time frame: three months (after both initiation and discontinuation of study drug)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jul 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 24366103Parkinson Study Group SURE-PD Investigators; Schwarzschild MA, Ascherio A, Beal MF, Cudkowicz ME, Curhan GC, Hare JM, Hooper DC, Kieburtz KD, Macklin EA, Oakes D, Rudolph A, Shoulson I, Tennis MK, Espay AJ, Gartner M, Hung A, Bwala G, Lenehan R, Encarnacion E, Ainslie M, Castillo R, Togasaki D, Barles G, Friedman JH, Niles L, Carter JH, Murray M, Goetz CG, Jaglin J, Ahmed A, Russell DS, Cotto C, Goudreau JL, Russell D, Parashos SA, Ede P, Saint-Hilaire MH, Thomas CA, James R, Stacy MA, Johnson J, Gauger L, Antonelle de Marcaida J, Thurlow S, Isaacson SH, Carvajal L, Rao J, Cook M, Hope-Porche C, McClurg L, Grasso DL, Logan R, Orme C, Ross T, Brocht AF, Constantinescu R, Sharma S, Venuto C, Weber J, Eaton K. Inosine to increase serum and cerebrospinal fluid urate in Parkinson disease: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2014 Feb;71(2):141-50. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.5528.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36865634Di Luca DG, Macklin EA, Hodgeman K, Lopez G, Pothier L, Callahan KF, Lowell J, Chan J, Videnovic A, Lungu C, Lang AE, Litvan I, Schwarzschild MA, Simuni T. Enrollment of Participants From Marginalized Racial and Ethnic Groups: A Comparative Assessment of the STEADY-PD III and SURE-PD3 Trials. Neurol Clin Pract. 2023 Feb;13(1):e200113. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200113. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34519802Parkinson Study Group SURE-PD3 Investigators; Schwarzschild MA, Ascherio A, Casaceli C, Curhan GC, Fitzgerald R, Kamp C, Lungu C, Macklin EA, Marek K, Mozaffarian D, Oakes D, Rudolph A, Shoulson I, Videnovic A, Scott B, Gauger L, Aldred J, Bixby M, Ciccarello J, Gunzler SA, Henchcliffe C, Brodsky M, Keith K, Hauser RA, Goetz C, LeDoux MS, Hinson V, Kumar R, Espay AJ, Jimenez-Shahed J, Hunter C, Christine C, Daley A, Leehey M, de Marcaida JA, Friedman JH, Hung A, Bwala G, Litvan I, Simon DK, Simuni T, Poon C, Schiess MC, Chou K, Park A, Bhatti D, Peterson C, Criswell SR, Rosenthal L, Durphy J, Shill HA, Mehta SH, Ahmed A, Deik AF, Fang JY, Stover N, Zhang L, Dewey RB Jr, Gerald A, Boyd JT, Houston E, Suski V, Mosovsky S, Cloud L, Shah BB, Saint-Hilaire M, James R, Zauber SE, Reich S, Shprecher D, Pahwa R, Langhammer A, LaFaver K, LeWitt PA, Kaminski P, Goudreau J, Russell D, Houghton DJ, Laroche A, Thomas K, McGraw M, Mari Z, Serrano C, Blindauer K, Rabin M, Kurlan R, Morgan JC, Soileau M, Ainslie M, Bodis-Wollner I, Schneider RB, Waters C, Ratel AS, Beck CA, Bolger P, Callahan KF, Crotty GF, Klements D, Kostrzebski M, McMahon GM, Pothier L, Waikar SS, Lang A, Mestre T. Effect of Urate-Elevating Inosine on Early Parkinson Disease Progression: The SURE-PD3 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 Sep 14;326(10):926-939. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.10207.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33942376Mestre TA, Macklin EA, Ascherio A, Ferreira JJ, Lang AE, Schwarzschild MA; Parkinson Study Group SURE-PD3 Investigators. Expectations of Benefit in a Trial of a Candidate Disease-Modifying Treatment for Parkinson Disease. Mov Disord. 2021 Aug;36(8):1964-1967. doi: 10.1002/mds.28630. Epub 2021 May 4.
- Not-for-profit scientific network of Parkinson centers in North AmericaLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified data; per policies of NIH/NINDS and the PSG (Parkinson Study Group)
Related trials for Parkinson's Disease
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Early Molecular Biomarkers for Differentiating Parkinsonian Syndromes
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Atypical Parkinsonism
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stromal Cells-derived Exosomes in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson Disease (PD)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Adaptive DBS to Offset STN Dysregulation During Exercise in PD
Parkinson Disease
Not yet recruiting
Compulsive Eating and Brain's Reward System in Different Pathologies
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Bipolar 1 Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Effect of the Zeen Mobility Device on Clinical Practicality, Safety, and Impact (Via Assessments of Walking, Standing Tolerance, Balance, Endurance, Effort, and Participation in Daily Tasks) in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Setting for Individuals With Mobility Impairments.
Stroke, Parkinson's Disease (PD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael A Schwarzschild, MD, PhD study chair
Massachusetts General Hospital (PI of Clinical Coordinating Center), PSG (Chair, SURE-PD3 Steering Committee)
Alberto Ascherio, MD, DrPH study director
Harvard School of Public Health, PSG (Co-Chair, SURE-PD3 Steering Committee)
David Oakes, PhD study director
University of Rochester (PI of Data Coordinating Center), PSG (Study Statistician/Member, SURE-PD3 Steering Committee)
62 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Inosine in people with Parkinson's Disease, run by Michael Alan Schwarzschild at 62 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 62 sites in United States, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Jul 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rate of Clinical Decline (time frame: two years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02642393, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jul 2020.