Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesNCT02642692
Hamstrings X Patellar Tendon for ACL Reconstruction in Soccer Players - RCT
A study testing Patellar Tendon graft and Hamstring Graft in people with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, run by Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to specifically evaluate outcomes of bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction in soccer players. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 14 to 40 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
- What is being tested?
- Patellar Tendon graft and Hamstring Graft
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- Jun 2015to Dec 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 14 to 40 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- unilateral ACL lesion
- skeletally mature patients with closed physis
- no previous surgery on the affected knee (except for arthroscopic meniscectomy)
- less than 1 year from injury
- no associated ligament injuries (except for the medial collateral ligament grade I and II)
- soccer players.
Who cannot join
- morbid obesity
- degenerative changes in arthroscopy or image exams
- those who play soccer less than 4 times / week
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Brazil1 site
Faculdade de Ciencias Medicas da Santa Casa de Sao Paulo
São Paulo, 01221020
About this study
Official title: Hamstrings X Patellar Tendon for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Soccer Players - RCT
The purpose of this study is to specifically evaluate outcomes of bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction in soccer players.
Read the detailed description
A number of techniques for ACL reconstruction have been proposed and tested, and most surgeons now prefer autografts with the patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon. The functional outcome after ACL reconstruction with the patellar or semitendinosus tendon has been a recent area of interest. Soccer is the most popular sport worldwide with more than 260 million active players, and it is hard to say if patellar tendon or semitendinosus grafts have different outcomes.
The purpose of this study was to specifically evaluate outcomes of bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction in soccer players. The hypothesis of this study was that hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction would provide no statistically significant differences in patient-reported outcome scores, postoperative level of sports function, and harvest-site morbidity when compared with patellar tendon autograft .The Cincinnati Knee Rating System (CKRS) was chosen as the primary outcome. As secondary outcome, reruptures.
Between march 2016 and march 2017, 60 soccer players will be operated. The investigators consider as soccer players those who play more than 4 times a week. Once included in the study, they will be randomized in two groups: "hamstring group" and "patellar tendon group".
The final clinical evaluation with two years. For both groups, the technique is the same, the fixation of the grafts with metal interference screws. Femoral tunnel will be drilled with outside-in technique. The tibial tunnel with conventional 55 degrees guide.
Both groups of patients will receive the same physical therapy protocol. Data will be evaluated with the SPSS software for Windows (version 13.0).
- Conditions
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
- Being tested
- Patellar Tendon graft, Hamstring Graft
- Keywords
- ACL reconstruction, Single bundle, Clinical results, Soccer players
- Medical subject headings
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Patellar Tendon graftProcedure or surgery
Acl reconstruction with patellar tendon graft
Hamstring GraftProcedure or surgery
Acl reconstruction with hamstring graft
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patellar Tendon Graft | Experimental | Kind of graft that will be used for acl reconstruction Receives: Procedure: Patellar Tendon graft |
| Hamstring Graft | Experimental | Kind of graft that will be used for acl reconstruction Receives: Procedure: Hamstring Graft |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cincinnati Knee Rating System
It is a subjective score
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (2)
rerupture
Measured: 2 years
International Knee Documentantion Committee (IKDC) score
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2015
- Primary completionDec 2020
- Study completionDec 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Luiz Gabriel Betoni Guglielmetti, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo
- Investigators
- luiz G guglielmetti, MD, Principal investigator, Faculdade de Ciencias Medicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02642692
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 16373713.1.0000.5479
- Status last verified
- Aug 2021
- First submitted
- 25 Dec 2015
- Last updated
- 27 Aug 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Corry IS, Webb JM, Clingeleffer AJ, Pinczewski LA. Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and four-strand hamstring tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med. 1999 Jul-Aug;27(4):444-54. doi: 10.1177/03635465990270040701.
PubMed 10424213Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Zaccherotti G, De Biase P. Patellar tendon versus doubled semitendinosus and gracilis tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1994 Mar-Apr;22(2):211-7; discussion 217-8. doi: 10.1177/036354659402200210.
PubMed 8198189Carter TR, Edinger S. Isokinetic evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: hamstring versus patellar tendon. Arthroscopy. 1999 Mar;15(2):169-72. doi: 10.1053/ar.1999.v15.0150161.
PubMed 10210074Mascarenhas R, Tranovich MJ, Kropf EJ, Fu FH, Harner CD. Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the young athlete: a retrospective matched analysis with 2-10 year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Aug;20(8):1520-7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1735-2. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
PubMed 22048746Walden M, Hagglund M, Werner J, Ekstrand J. The epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament injury in football (soccer): a review of the literature from a gender-related perspective. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Jan;19(1):3-10. doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1172-7. Epub 2010 Jun 9.
PubMed 20532868Fink C, Hoser C, Benedetto KP, Judmaier W. [(Neuro)muscular changes in the knee stabilizing muscles after rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament]. Sportverletz Sportschaden. 1994 Mar;8(1):25-30. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-993449. German.
PubMed 8197541Guglielmetti LGB, Salas VER, Jorge PB, Severino FR, Duarte A, de Oliveira VM, Cury RPL. Prospective and Randomized Clinical Evaluation of Hamstring Versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Soccer Players. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Sep 24;9(9):23259671211028168. doi: 10.1177/23259671211028168. eCollection 2021 Sep.
PubMed 34604426
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Aug 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Hamstrings X Patellar Tendon for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Soccer Players - RCT
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02642692
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 16373713.1.0000.5479
- Conditions
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
- Keywords
- ACL reconstruction, Single bundle, Clinical results, Soccer players
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São PauloUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2015
- Primary completion
- Dec 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to specifically evaluate outcomes of bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction in soccer players.
Detailed description
A number of techniques for ACL reconstruction have been proposed and tested, and most surgeons now prefer autografts with the patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon. The functional outcome after ACL reconstruction with the patellar or semitendinosus tendon has been a recent area of interest. Soccer is the most popular sport worldwide with more than 260 million active players, and it is hard to say if patellar tendon or semitendinosus grafts have different outcomes.
The purpose of this study was to specifically evaluate outcomes of bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction in soccer players. The hypothesis of this study was that hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction would provide no statistically significant differences in patient-reported outcome scores, postoperative level of sports function, and harvest-site morbidity when compared with patellar tendon autograft .The Cincinnati Knee Rating System (CKRS) was chosen as the primary outcome. As secondary outcome, reruptures.
Between march 2016 and march 2017, 60 soccer players will be operated. The investigators consider as soccer players those who play more than 4 times a week. Once included in the study, they will be randomized in two groups: "hamstring group" and "patellar tendon group".
The final clinical evaluation with two years. For both groups, the technique is the same, the fixation of the grafts with metal interference screws. Femoral tunnel will be drilled with outside-in technique. The tibial tunnel with conventional 55 degrees guide.
Both groups of patients will receive the same physical therapy protocol. Data will be evaluated with the SPSS software for Windows (version 13.0).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patellar Tendon Graft | Experimental | Procedure: Patellar Tendon graftKind of graft that will be used for acl reconstruction |
| Hamstring Graft | Experimental | Procedure: Hamstring GraftKind of graft that will be used for acl reconstruction |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 14 to 40 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- unilateral ACL lesion
- skeletally mature patients with closed physis
- no previous surgery on the affected knee (except for arthroscopic meniscectomy)
- less than 1 year from injury
- no associated ligament injuries (except for the medial collateral ligament grade I and II)
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- morbid obesity
- degenerative changes in arthroscopy or image exams
- those who play soccer less than 4 times / week
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Patellar Tendon graftAcl reconstruction with patellar tendon graft | Procedure or surgery | Patellar Tendon Graft |
| Hamstring GraftAcl reconstruction with hamstring graft | Procedure or surgery | Hamstring Graft |
Primary outcome
Cincinnati Knee Rating System
Time frame: 2 years
It is a subjective score
2 secondary outcomes
rerupture
Time frame: 2 years
International Knee Documentantion Committee (IKDC) score
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Aug 2021.
- Background: PubMed 10424213Corry IS, Webb JM, Clingeleffer AJ, Pinczewski LA. Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and four-strand hamstring tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med. 1999 Jul-Aug;27(4):444-54. doi: 10.1177/03635465990270040701.
- Background: PubMed 8198189Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Zaccherotti G, De Biase P. Patellar tendon versus doubled semitendinosus and gracilis tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1994 Mar-Apr;22(2):211-7; discussion 217-8. doi: 10.1177/036354659402200210.
- Background: PubMed 10210074Carter TR, Edinger S. Isokinetic evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: hamstring versus patellar tendon. Arthroscopy. 1999 Mar;15(2):169-72. doi: 10.1053/ar.1999.v15.0150161.
- Background: PubMed 22048746Mascarenhas R, Tranovich MJ, Kropf EJ, Fu FH, Harner CD. Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the young athlete: a retrospective matched analysis with 2-10 year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Aug;20(8):1520-7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1735-2. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
- Background: PubMed 20532868Walden M, Hagglund M, Werner J, Ekstrand J. The epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament injury in football (soccer): a review of the literature from a gender-related perspective. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Jan;19(1):3-10. doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1172-7. Epub 2010 Jun 9.
- Background: PubMed 8197541Fink C, Hoser C, Benedetto KP, Judmaier W. [(Neuro)muscular changes in the knee stabilizing muscles after rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament]. Sportverletz Sportschaden. 1994 Mar;8(1):25-30. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-993449. German.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34604426Guglielmetti LGB, Salas VER, Jorge PB, Severino FR, Duarte A, de Oliveira VM, Cury RPL. Prospective and Randomized Clinical Evaluation of Hamstring Versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Soccer Players. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Sep 24;9(9):23259671211028168. doi: 10.1177/23259671211028168. eCollection 2021 Sep.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Not yet recruiting
Stair Biomechanics and Vibration Study After ACLR
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR), Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
Not yet recruiting
Supporting Athletes' Return to Sports After ACL Reconstruction: A Study of a Psychological Readiness Program
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Recruiting
Graded Exposure and Mindfulness Meditation for Patients Post-ACL Reconstruction
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Not yet recruiting
Clinical and Biological Outcomes of BioBrace-Augmented ACL Reconstruction
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Postoperative Recovery Quality in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Recovery Quality
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
luiz G guglielmetti, MD principal investigator
Faculdade de Ciencias Medicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Patellar Tendon graft and Hamstring Graft in people with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, run by Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cincinnati Knee Rating System (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02642692, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Aug 2021.