Diabetes MellitusNCT02645448
Glycemic Responses and of the Autonomic Cardiac Function in Diabetes Type-2 Women Post Resistance Exercise
A study testing Resistance Exercise in people with Diabetes Mellitus and Autonomic Diseases, run by Universidade Federal do vale do São Francisco.
Trial summary
The aim of this study was to investigate and correlate the glucose responses and VFC 24 hours after resistance exercise (RE) sessions at different intensities in women with type 2 diabetes (DM-2). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 60 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus, Autonomic Diseases
- What is being tested?
- Resistance Exercise
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 12 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Nov 2014to Sep 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 60 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Being female, diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (DM-2) and be clinically stable, and be aged between 40 and 60 years.
Who cannot join
- Make use of exogenous insulin
- Have morbid obesity (BMI> 40 kg / m2)
- Provide uncompensated glucose and abnormalities in the electrocardiogram (ECG) at rest with suggestion of cardiac ischemia from above or below unevenness in the ST segment> 2mm or reversal in T wave
- Presenting heart disease
- Proliferative diabetic retinopathy
- Severe autonomic neuropathy
Show all 10Show fewer
- Any limb amputation
- Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic> 160 mmHg and / or diastolic BP> 100 mmHg)
- Diabetic nephropathy (albuminuria ≥ 14mg / L or> 30mg / 24h) chronic renal failure (SBD, 2014; ADA, 2014)
- Osteo-myo-articular problems that limited the exercises and being a smoker.
About this study
Official title: Glycemic Responses and of the Autonomic Cardiac Function in Diabetes Type-2 Women Post Resistance Exercise of Different Intensities
The aim of this study was to investigate and correlate the glucose responses and VFC 24 hours after resistance exercise (RE) sessions at different intensities in women with type 2 diabetes (DM-2). Twelve women with DM-2 were invited to perform by one week in randomized order, two weeks interventions with experimental sessions: Session Control (CONT) without conducting RE, RE session (40% or 80% of one maximum repetition - 1RM) on day 2 and day 3 was observed the effect of the length of RE session by 11h. After that, initiated the experimental sessions, where after each of the analysis of glucose 24h by continuous monitoring system of glucose was performed, considering breakfast, lunch, dinner and sleep, and analysis performed of the RR series by a period of 48h. During control sessions, the subjects were seated comfortably for 40min and RE sessions, 40%1RM and 80%1RM, were performed in medium circuit 3 sets with 16 and 8 replications and recovery range between 60 exercises and 90seg , respectively, and between the circuits 120sec. It was observed that the concentration of glucose in the period of 24h after the session has been reduced to 40% 1RM vs. CONT and 80%1RM. Hyperglycemia was prevalent in the period 34h of the sessions CONT and 80%1RM, respectively , being different from the session 40%1RM. In postprandial times, shorter hyperglycemia was found in the session to 40% 1RM vs. CONT and 80% 1RM after breakfast, lunch and dinner. At the time of sleep, less time in hyperglycemia was found between sessions of 40% 1RM vs. 80% 1RM. Significant correlations (p <0.01) were found between glucose 24h with cardiac autonomic RRi variables, HF, LF and reason LF:HF.
Read the detailed description
This study was a randomized cross-by blocks in accordance with CONSORT (Schulz et al., 2010).
In total, 12 women with DM-2, between 48 and 60 years old participated in the study, where they were informed of risks, benefits and objectives of the study and signed a consent form Clarified (IC) previously approved by the Ethics Committee and Ethics in Research and Studies (CEDEP) of the Federal University of São Francisco Valley (UNIVASF), Petrolina - PE, Brazil (No. 0005/180814 CEDEP).
Of the participants, 11 were taking oral hypoglycemic medication (metformin [n = 7], Sulphonylurea [n = 1] Metformin in combination with sulfonylurea [n = 3]) and performed only dietary control.
Before the first visit to the UNIVASF Exercise Physiology Laboratory, the participants underwent a resting ECG examination, which could only be submitted to the test of a one maximum repetition (1RM) and meetings after report of normality certified by cardiologist.
On the first visit to the lab, participants responded history about health history, physical activity level and risk stratification. Subsequently were performed anthropometric measurements of waist circumference, abdomen and hip, as well as height and body mass for subsequent calculation of body mass index.
Two weeks before starting the intervention, participants underwent familiarization with the exercise protocol for three alternate days. After 48 hours was performed the 1RM test in the following exercises: bench press on the machine (pectoral and anterior deltoid muscle), extensor chair (quadriceps muscle), Flying (pectoral muscle), flexor chair (muscle biceps femoris, semitendinosus and semimembranosus), Pull High ahead (posterior muscles of the torso and biceps), leg press (quadriceps and gluteus), sitting Remada (posterior muscles of the torso and biceps) in equipment of Evidence® mark (Cachoerinha / RS - Brazil) and Physicus® (Auriflama / SP - Brazil).
After the 1RM test, participants received guidance in relation to food intake and the practice of daily physical activity, and that, 48 hours before the first day of intervention, do not ingest drinks contained alcohol and caffeine.
In the days of the sessions, participants fasted, they went to the lab, where they received a standard breakfast containing 285 kcal, 45g and (180 kcal) carbohydrate, 6 g (24 kcal) of protein and 9 g (81 kcal) of fat. Also they were asked to maintain the same diet during the two-week intervention and record consumption in a food diary, which was later analyzed and calculated by a trained nutritionist, using Microsoft Excel® software and the Brazilian Table of Food Composition.
It was also recommended that the main meals were taken at the same time of day (Breakfast between 7:00 and 7:20h; lunch between 12:00h and 14:00h and Dinner between 18:00h and 20:00h). The energy intake and consumption of daily macronutrients did not differ between sessions as shown in Table 2. During the days of intervention participants were instructed to refrain from any exercise and / or strenuous physical labor.
The glucose sensor (Sof-sensor, Medtronic Minimed, Inc., Northridge, CA, USA) has been installed the day before the first session being inserted following manufacturer's instructions SMGG Guardian real-time (Medtronic Minimed, Inc., Northridge CA, USA), which consists of a transmitter sensor inserted through a needle into the abdominal subcutaneous tissue using a device (Sen-Seter, Medtronic Minimed, Inc., Northridge, CA, USA) and a monitor for reading with wireless radio frequency sensor. This system has been validated in DM control studies and complications.
After the installation, there were appropriate calibration of the equipment following the manufacturer's recommendations. During the monitoring period, capillary glucose samples were collected using a glucose monitor (Accu-Check Performa, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) to calibrate the SMCG, being held four times every 24 hours monitoring by the researcher. Participants were blinded with regard to measurements of SMCG and capillary glucose during calibrations.
The glucose concentrations were analyzed on day 1 (24 hours analysis to observe the effect of the control section), Day 2 (24h analysis to observe the effect of Resistance Exercise - RE on different intensities) and day 3 (11h analysis of the duration of effect RE at different intensities).
To evaluate the autonomic modulation is adopted the frequency meter of Polar® RS800CX model (Electo Oy, Kempele, Finland) with proven validity and reproducibility (Essner et al, 2013; Jonckheer-SHEEHY et al, 2012.).
The investigated autonomic indicators were: 1) straight-time domain from absolute average records of RR intervals (RRi) and; 2) the frequency domain method for spectral analysis by Fast Fourier Transformer (low frequency - LF normalized units as a marker of sympathetic activity, high frequency - HF also with normalized units as a marker of vagal activity, and the LF:. HF as a marker of sympathovagal balance). All indexes are described by the European Society of Cardiology (TASK FORCE HEART Variability, 1996) and all Analyses were performed in Kubios HRV Analysis Software version 2.0 (Biosignal Laboratory, University of Kuopio, Finland).
All participants took part in a randomized experimental study, which consisted of two intervention periods, with each period consisted of three days where on day 1 a control session (CONT) was held, day 2 to RE session (40% 1RM or 80% 1RM), day 3 to check the duration of the effect of exercise. Each intervention aimed to assess the impact of a workout on glycemic control in standardized food and free living conditions.
Initially the participants arrived at the laboratory in fasting at 7: 00 and at that time was provided to them a standardized breakfast containing 285kcal, breakfast period was between 7: 00 - 7: 20h. After this period, the volunteers were instructed again on the subsequent power the sessions and even at that time, the frequency meter Polar RS800CX has been installed for reading RRi during and post-session, totaling 24 hours of Heart Rate Variability (HRV) measurements.
Each participant performed four sessions: CONT, ER 40% 1RM and ER 80% 1RM, and the RE sessions at different intensities randomized by blocks, in food standardization and abstention from other types of exercise, but free living conditions while using SMCG polar and frequency meter. In each session glycemic and autonomic responses were analyzed by a 24-hour period started at each session.
All sessions lasted 60 minutes, consisting of 20 minutes of a pre-intervention period (rest) and control session 40min (day1) and session RE (day 2), and were performed at the same time of day between 8:00 and 9:00. During all sessions the participants were already under the glucose monitoring and VFC. At the end of each session, participants were released to daily routine always under the use of SMCG and frequency meter.
The experimental sessions were distributed in two weeks, being held on the 1st of each week a control session and on day 2 an RE session (40% 1RM and 80% 1RM). On day 3 no intervention was only observed for a period of 11h monitoring, the possible duration of the ER effect in the preceding day.
Pre-intervention: Before any intervention, the participants remained seated in the laboratory for a period of 20 minutes in a quiet room without interference from noise and temperature between 23-24ºC (SOUZA et al, 2013.). During this period, every 5 minutes, the concentrations of glucose through the SMCG and RRi through the frequency meter were obtained.
Intervention: The intensities of RE have been established based on the classification of the American College Sport Medicine and American Diabetes Association for individuals with DM-2, and categorized the low intensity with 40% 1RM and high intensity exercise with 80% 1RM (Colberg et al., 2010). RE sessions 40% and 80% 1RM addition control section (no RE) lasted 40 minutes each. For RE sessions it was held three circuits with 7 exercise each, in the same sequence the 1RM test (the machine bench press, leg extension Chair, Flying, flexor chair, high Pull ahead, leg press, seated row). For RE session at 40% 1RM were performed 16 repetitions of each exercise with an interval of 60 seconds between them and 120 seconds between circuits. For RE session at 80% 1RM were performed 08 repetitions of each exercise with an interval of 90 seconds between them and 120 seconds between circuits. The duration repeat the exercise both 40% and 80% 1RM was 3 seconds, 1 second in the concentric phase and 2 seconds in the eccentric phase of the movement. In CONT sessions participants remained seated in a comfortable chair, being in the same room of the ER sessions.
Post-intervention: At the end of each session the participants were released to daily routine, being oriented to record daily food intake (day 1) and equalize the same consumption in the following days (days 2 and 3) during the two weeks of intervention. Also, avoid performing exercises of any nature and make use of the medication in the same way in periods of intervention.
Data were expressed as mean ± SD (standard deviation). Data normality was confirmed by the Shapiro-Wilk test. The glucose values were used to determine the average concentration of glucose and the prevalence of hyperglycemia (blood glucose concentrations exceeded 160 mg.dL-1) both in 24 and in the postprandial different times: breakfast (08: 00 - 12: 00), lunch (13:00h - 18:00h), dinner (19:00h - 23:00h) and sleep (23:00h - 06:00h). Analysis of variance one way (ANOVA) with repeated measures was performed to determine differences in experimental conditions (CONT x 40% x 80% 1RM). Post-hoc Tukey's pair for identification of differences was used as an 'F' mean was obtained. Pearson's linear correlation test was also adopted to investigate the association between glucose and HRV. Significance was set at p confidence level <0.05. All statistical calculations were performed using the STATISTICA software for Windows v. 6.0 (StatSoft, Inc.)
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Autonomic Diseases
- Being tested
- Resistance Exercise
- Keywords
- Resistance Exercise, Diabetes Mellitus, Heart Rate Variability
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Autonomic Nervous System Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Resistance ExerciseOther
Control Session
Resistance exercise at different intensities (40%1RM or 80%1RM)
Duration of effect
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Resistance Exercise Low intensity | Other | Day 1 (Control Session)
Day 2 (Resistance Exercise)
Day 3 (Duration of effect) Receives: Other: Resistance Exercise |
| Resistance Exercise High intensity | Other | Day 1 (Control Session)
Day 2 (Resistance Exercise)
Day 3 (Duration of effect) Receives: Other: Resistance Exercise |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Concentration of glucose and hyperglycemia prevalence
Acute bout of resistance exercise at 40% 1RM (low intensity) reduced glucose concentrations and the prevalence of hyperglycemia in 73.1 ± 37.7% and 68.4 ± 51.1% compared to the sessions CONT40% and resistance exercise 80% 1RM (high intensity) respectively in 24h from each session.
Measured: 24 hours
Secondary outcomes (2)
Heart Rate Variability
In this study there was no difference between sessions of resistance exercise, during 24 hours, in any of the HRV indicators in the field of time and frequency.
Measured: 24 hours
Correlation between heart rate variability and glucose 24 hours
Negative correlations between glucose 24 to the RR intervals and the parasympathetic modulation indicator HF, and positive correlations with the sympathetic modulation indicator LF and sympathovagal balance.
Measured: 24 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2014
- Primary completionAug 2015
- Study completionSep 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade Federal do vale do São Francisco
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, LOUMAÍRA CARVALHO DA CRUZ, Universidade Federal do vale do São Francisco
- Investigators
- Loumaíra Carvalho da Cruz, Principal investigator, Universidade Federal do vale do São Francisco
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02645448
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UFSaoFrancisco
- Status last verified
- Dec 2015
- First submitted
- 12 Dec 2015
- Last updated
- 1 Jan 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Jan 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Glycemic Responses and of the Autonomic Cardiac Function in Diabetes Type-2 Women Post Resistance Exercise of Different Intensities
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02645448
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UFSaoFrancisco
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Autonomic Diseases
- Keywords
- Resistance Exercise, Diabetes Mellitus, Heart Rate Variability
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade Federal do vale do São FranciscoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior.
- Study start
- Nov 2014
- Primary completion
- Aug 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study was to investigate and correlate the glucose responses and VFC 24 hours after resistance exercise (RE) sessions at different intensities in women with type 2 diabetes (DM-2). Twelve women with DM-2 were invited to perform by one week in randomized order, two weeks interventions with experimental sessions: Session Control (CONT) without conducting RE, RE session (40% or 80% of one maximum repetition - 1RM) on day 2 and day 3 was observed the effect of the length of RE session by 11h. After that, initiated the experimental sessions, where after each of the analysis of glucose 24h by continuous monitoring system of glucose was performed, considering breakfast, lunch, dinner and sleep, and analysis performed of the RR series by a period of 48h. During control sessions, the subjects were seated comfortably for 40min and RE sessions, 40%1RM and 80%1RM, were performed in medium circuit 3 sets with 16 and 8 replications and recovery range between 60 exercises and 90seg , respectively, and between the circuits 120sec. It was observed that the concentration of glucose in the period of 24h after the session has been reduced to 40% 1RM vs. CONT and 80%1RM. Hyperglycemia was prevalent in the period 34h of the sessions CONT and 80%1RM, respectively , being different from the session 40%1RM. In postprandial times, shorter hyperglycemia was found in the session to 40% 1RM vs. CONT and 80% 1RM after breakfast, lunch and dinner. At the time of sleep, less time in hyperglycemia was found between sessions of 40% 1RM vs. 80% 1RM. Significant correlations (p <0.01) were found between glucose 24h with cardiac autonomic RRi variables, HF, LF and reason LF:HF.
Detailed description
This study was a randomized cross-by blocks in accordance with CONSORT (Schulz et al., 2010).
In total, 12 women with DM-2, between 48 and 60 years old participated in the study, where they were informed of risks, benefits and objectives of the study and signed a consent form Clarified (IC) previously approved by the Ethics Committee and Ethics in Research and Studies (CEDEP) of the Federal University of São Francisco Valley (UNIVASF), Petrolina - PE, Brazil (No. 0005/180814 CEDEP).
Of the participants, 11 were taking oral hypoglycemic medication (metformin [n = 7], Sulphonylurea [n = 1] Metformin in combination with sulfonylurea [n = 3]) and performed only dietary control.
Before the first visit to the UNIVASF Exercise Physiology Laboratory, the participants underwent a resting ECG examination, which could only be submitted to the test of a one maximum repetition (1RM) and meetings after report of normality certified by cardiologist.
On the first visit to the lab, participants responded history about health history, physical activity level and risk stratification. Subsequently were performed anthropometric measurements of waist circumference, abdomen and hip, as well as height and body mass for subsequent calculation of body mass index.
Two weeks before starting the intervention, participants underwent familiarization with the exercise protocol for three alternate days. After 48 hours was performed the 1RM test in the following exercises: bench press on the machine (pectoral and anterior deltoid muscle), extensor chair (quadriceps muscle), Flying (pectoral muscle), flexor chair (muscle biceps femoris, semitendinosus and semimembranosus), Pull High ahead (posterior muscles of the torso and biceps), leg press (quadriceps and gluteus), sitting Remada (posterior muscles of the torso and biceps) in equipment of Evidence® mark (Cachoerinha / RS - Brazil) and Physicus® (Auriflama / SP - Brazil).
After the 1RM test, participants received guidance in relation to food intake and the practice of daily physical activity, and that, 48 hours before the first day of intervention, do not ingest drinks contained alcohol and caffeine.
In the days of the sessions, participants fasted, they went to the lab, where they received a standard breakfast containing 285 kcal, 45g and (180 kcal) carbohydrate, 6 g (24 kcal) of protein and 9 g (81 kcal) of fat. Also they were asked to maintain the same diet during the two-week intervention and record consumption in a food diary, which was later analyzed and calculated by a trained nutritionist, using Microsoft Excel® software and the Brazilian Table of Food Composition.
It was also recommended that the main meals were taken at the same time of day (Breakfast between 7:00 and 7:20h; lunch between 12:00h and 14:00h and Dinner between 18:00h and 20:00h). The energy intake and consumption of daily macronutrients did not differ between sessions as shown in Table 2. During the days of intervention participants were instructed to refrain from any exercise and / or strenuous physical labor.
The glucose sensor (Sof-sensor, Medtronic Minimed, Inc., Northridge, CA, USA) has been installed the day before the first session being inserted following manufacturer's instructions SMGG Guardian real-time (Medtronic Minimed, Inc., Northridge CA, USA), which consists of a transmitter sensor inserted through a needle into the abdominal subcutaneous tissue using a device (Sen-Seter, Medtronic Minimed, Inc., Northridge, CA, USA) and a monitor for reading with wireless radio frequency sensor. This system has been validated in DM control studies and complications.
After the installation, there were appropriate calibration of the equipment following the manufacturer's recommendations. During the monitoring period, capillary glucose samples were collected using a glucose monitor (Accu-Check Performa, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) to calibrate the SMCG, being held four times every 24 hours monitoring by the researcher. Participants were blinded with regard to measurements of SMCG and capillary glucose during calibrations.
The glucose concentrations were analyzed on day 1 (24 hours analysis to observe the effect of the control section), Day 2 (24h analysis to observe the effect of Resistance Exercise - RE on different intensities) and day 3 (11h analysis of the duration of effect RE at different intensities).
To evaluate the autonomic modulation is adopted the frequency meter of Polar® RS800CX model (Electo Oy, Kempele, Finland) with proven validity and reproducibility (Essner et al, 2013; Jonckheer-SHEEHY et al, 2012.).
The investigated autonomic indicators were: 1) straight-time domain from absolute average records of RR intervals (RRi) and; 2) the frequency domain method for spectral analysis by Fast Fourier Transformer (low frequency - LF normalized units as a marker of sympathetic activity, high frequency - HF also with normalized units as a marker of vagal activity, and the LF:. HF as a marker of sympathovagal balance). All indexes are described by the European Society of Cardiology (TASK FORCE HEART Variability, 1996) and all Analyses were performed in Kubios HRV Analysis Software version 2.0 (Biosignal Laboratory, University of Kuopio, Finland).
All participants took part in a randomized experimental study, which consisted of two intervention periods, with each period consisted of three days where on day 1 a control session (CONT) was held, day 2 to RE session (40% 1RM or 80% 1RM), day 3 to check the duration of the effect of exercise. Each intervention aimed to assess the impact of a workout on glycemic control in standardized food and free living conditions.
Initially the participants arrived at the laboratory in fasting at 7: 00 and at that time was provided to them a standardized breakfast containing 285kcal, breakfast period was between 7: 00 - 7: 20h. After this period, the volunteers were instructed again on the subsequent power the sessions and even at that time, the frequency meter Polar RS800CX has been installed for reading RRi during and post-session, totaling 24 hours of Heart Rate Variability (HRV) measurements.
Each participant performed four sessions: CONT, ER 40% 1RM and ER 80% 1RM, and the RE sessions at different intensities randomized by blocks, in food standardization and abstention from other types of exercise, but free living conditions while using SMCG polar and frequency meter. In each session glycemic and autonomic responses were analyzed by a 24-hour period started at each session.
All sessions lasted 60 minutes, consisting of 20 minutes of a pre-intervention period (rest) and control session 40min (day1) and session RE (day 2), and were performed at the same time of day between 8:00 and 9:00. During all sessions the participants were already under the glucose monitoring and VFC. At the end of each session, participants were released to daily routine always under the use of SMCG and frequency meter.
The experimental sessions were distributed in two weeks, being held on the 1st of each week a control session and on day 2 an RE session (40% 1RM and 80% 1RM). On day 3 no intervention was only observed for a period of 11h monitoring, the possible duration of the ER effect in the preceding day.
Pre-intervention: Before any intervention, the participants remained seated in the laboratory for a period of 20 minutes in a quiet room without interference from noise and temperature between 23-24ºC (SOUZA et al, 2013.). During this period, every 5 minutes, the concentrations of glucose through the SMCG and RRi through the frequency meter were obtained.
Intervention: The intensities of RE have been established based on the classification of the American College Sport Medicine and American Diabetes Association for individuals with DM-2, and categorized the low intensity with 40% 1RM and high intensity exercise with 80% 1RM (Colberg et al., 2010). RE sessions 40% and 80% 1RM addition control section (no RE) lasted 40 minutes each. For RE sessions it was held three circuits with 7 exercise each, in the same sequence the 1RM test (the machine bench press, leg extension Chair, Flying, flexor chair, high Pull ahead, leg press, seated row). For RE session at 40% 1RM were performed 16 repetitions of each exercise with an interval of 60 seconds between them and 120 seconds between circuits. For RE session at 80% 1RM were performed 08 repetitions of each exercise with an interval of 90 seconds between them and 120 seconds between circuits. The duration repeat the exercise both 40% and 80% 1RM was 3 seconds, 1 second in the concentric phase and 2 seconds in the eccentric phase of the movement. In CONT sessions participants remained seated in a comfortable chair, being in the same room of the ER sessions.
Post-intervention: At the end of each session the participants were released to daily routine, being oriented to record daily food intake (day 1) and equalize the same consumption in the following days (days 2 and 3) during the two weeks of intervention. Also, avoid performing exercises of any nature and make use of the medication in the same way in periods of intervention.
Data were expressed as mean ± SD (standard deviation). Data normality was confirmed by the Shapiro-Wilk test. The glucose values were used to determine the average concentration of glucose and the prevalence of hyperglycemia (blood glucose concentrations exceeded 160 mg.dL-1) both in 24 and in the postprandial different times: breakfast (08: 00 - 12: 00), lunch (13:00h - 18:00h), dinner (19:00h - 23:00h) and sleep (23:00h - 06:00h). Analysis of variance one way (ANOVA) with repeated measures was performed to determine differences in experimental conditions (CONT x 40% x 80% 1RM). Post-hoc Tukey's pair for identification of differences was used as an 'F' mean was obtained. Pearson's linear correlation test was also adopted to investigate the association between glucose and HRV. Significance was set at p confidence level <0.05. All statistical calculations were performed using the STATISTICA software for Windows v. 6.0 (StatSoft, Inc.)
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Resistance Exercise Low intensity | Other | Other: Resistance ExerciseDay 1 (Control Session) Day 2 (Resistance Exercise) Day 3 (Duration of effect) |
| Resistance Exercise High intensity | Other | Other: Resistance ExerciseDay 1 (Control Session) Day 2 (Resistance Exercise) Day 3 (Duration of effect) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 60 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Being female, diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (DM-2) and be clinically stable, and be aged between 40 and 60 years.
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Make use of exogenous insulin
- Have morbid obesity (BMI> 40 kg / m2)
- Provide uncompensated glucose and abnormalities in the electrocardiogram (ECG) at rest with suggestion of cardiac ischemia from above or below unevenness in the ST segment> 2mm or reversal in T wave
- Presenting heart disease
- Proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Resistance ExerciseControl Session Resistance exercise at different intensities (40%1RM or 80%1RM) Duration of effect | Other | Resistance Exercise High intensity, Resistance Exercise Low intensity |
Primary outcome
Concentration of glucose and hyperglycemia prevalence
Time frame: 24 hours
Acute bout of resistance exercise at 40% 1RM (low intensity) reduced glucose concentrations and the prevalence of hyperglycemia in 73.1 ± 37.7% and 68.4 ± 51.1% compared to the sessions CONT40% and resistance exercise 80% 1RM (high intensity) respectively in 24h from each session.
2 secondary outcomes
Heart Rate Variability
Time frame: 24 hours
Correlation between heart rate variability and glucose 24 hours
Time frame: 24 hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Jan 2016.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Effects of Lean Pork Loin Intake on Protein Homeostasis and Glucose Regulation in Prediabetic Adults
Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Prediabetes
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Loumaíra Carvalho da Cruz principal investigator
Universidade Federal do vale do São Francisco
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Resistance Exercise in people with Diabetes Mellitus and Autonomic Diseases, run by Universidade Federal do vale do São Francisco.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jan 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Concentration of glucose and hyperglycemia prevalence (time frame: 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jan 2016.