TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)Phase 3ACESNCT02645578
Asia Coma Electrical Stimulation (the ACES Trial)
A Phase 3 study testing Right median nerve stimulation in people with TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury), run by RenJi Hospital.
Trial summary
This study is a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial from Asian countries to compare the effect and safety of right median nerve stimulation versus traditional treatment for comatose patients at the early stage following traumatic brain injury. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)
- What is being tested?
- Right median nerve stimulation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 360 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2016to Dec 2017
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- A confirmed history of closed traumatic brain injury 10 days before enrollment
- A Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score of 4-8 or the motor part less than 5 if the patient received tracheotomy.
- 18-65 years of age
Who cannot join
- Unstable vital signs
- Have a history of severe cardiac arrhythmias, implanted pacemaker, as well as seizures
- Pregnancy
- No informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
Guoyi Gao contact
Jin Lei contact
About this study
Official title: Asia Coma Electrical Stimulation Trial: an Asian Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Right Median Nerve Stimulation for Traumatic Coma
This study is a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial from Asian countries to compare the effect and safety of right median nerve stimulation versus traditional treatment for comatose patients at the early stage following traumatic brain injury.
Read the detailed description
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity and one of the greatest unmet needs in public health. The most severe injury can lead to a poor outcome and prolonged coma of the victims. It is estimated that ten to fifteen percent of the severe TBI patients are discharged in a prolonged coma or a vegetative state. However, no treatment measure to data has been proven robustly to alter the pace of recovery or improve neurological outcome of the comatose patients following TBI.
Although right median nerve electrical stimulation (RMNS) has been used clinically for more than two decades, no strong evidence of efficacy was generated because of the limitations in the past trials including a small sample size or the inappropriate study design. In the present study, a multicenter research network with inclusion of neurotrauma centers from China, India, Nepal and Kazakhstan was established with the aim to validate the efficacy and safety of a promising intervention strategy for traumatic coma at early stage. Since RMNS is a simple, inexpensive, noninvasive technique with a good safety profile, our study will probably add more evidence to the treatment of traumatic coma in Asian countries.
- Conditions
- TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)
- Being tested
- Right median nerve stimulation
- Keywords
- Coma, traumatic brain injury, median nerve stimulation
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Coma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Right median nerve stimulationDevice
Also called RMNS
Right median nerve electrical stimulation (RMNS) is administered via a pair of lubricated one-inch square rubber surface electrodes pasted on the volar aspect of the right distal forearm over the median nerve. An electrical neuromuscular stimulator supplied trains of asymmetric biphasic pluses at an amplitude of 20 milliamps with a pulse width of 300 microseconds at 40 Hz for 20 sec/min. The RMNS treatment continues 8 hours per day for two weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| RMNS group | Experimental | Focus intervention: right median nerve stimulation plus standard management Receives: Device: Right median nerve stimulation |
| Control group | No intervention | Standard management |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of patients returning consciousness
The term "consciousness" is defined when the patient shows objective ability to respond to verbal commands.
Measured: Within six months after injury
Secondary outcomes (6)
Duration of unconsciousness
This outcome is defined as the time between trauma and objective recovery of the ability to respond to verbal commands
Measured: Within six months after injury
Adverse events
The potential adverse events include but not limited to seizures, intracranial bleeding, increased sympathetic activity and so on.
Measured: Within six months post injury
Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)
Measured: 28 days post injury
Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R)
Measured: six months post injury
Disability Rating Scale (DRS)
Measured: six months post injury
Full Outline of UnResponsiveness scale(FOUR)
Measured: 28 days post injury
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2016
- Primary completionJun 2017 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 360 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- RenJi Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, JSC National Center for Neurosurgery, Republic of Kazakhstan, College of Medical Sciences Teaching Hospital. Nepal
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Guoyi Gao, RenJi Hospital
- Investigators
- Jiyao Jiang, Study chair, RenJi HospitalJunfeng Feng, Study director, RenJi HospitalGuoyi Gao, Principal investigator, RenJi Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02645578
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Renjineuro
- Acronym
- ACES
- Status last verified
- Dec 2015
- First submitted
- 23 Dec 2015
- Last updated
- 1 Jan 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Publications
Lei J, Wang L, Gao G, Cooper E, Jiang J. Right Median Nerve Electrical Stimulation for Acute Traumatic Coma Patients. J Neurotrauma. 2015 Oct 15;32(20):1584-9. doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3768. Epub 2015 May 7.
PubMed 25664378Cooper EB, Scherder EJ, Cooper JB. Electrical treatment of reduced consciousness: experience with coma and Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2005 Jul-Sep;15(3-4):389-405. doi: 10.1080/09602010443000317.
PubMed 16350980Liu JT, Wang CH, Chou IC, Sun SS, Koa CH, Cooper E. Regaining consciousness for prolonged comatose patients with right median nerve stimulation. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2003;87:11-4. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6081-7_3.
PubMed 14518515Cooper EB, Cooper JB. Electrical treatment of coma via the median nerve. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2003;87:7-10. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6081-7_2.
PubMed 14518514Peri CV, Shaffrey ME, Farace E, Cooper E, Alves WM, Cooper JB, Young JS, Jane JA. Pilot study of electrical stimulation on median nerve in comatose severe brain injured patients: 3-month outcome. Brain Inj. 2001 Oct;15(10):903-10. doi: 10.1080/02699050110065709.
PubMed 11595086Wu X, Xie L, Lei J, Yao J, Li J, Ruan L, Hong J, Zheng G, Cheng Y, Long L, Wang J, Huang C, Xie Q, Zhang X, He J, Yu X, Lv S, Sun Z, Liu D, Li X, Zhu J, Yang X, Wang D, Bao Y, Maas AIR, Menon D, Xue Y, Jiang J, Feng J, Gao G; ACES Participants. Acute traumatic coma awakening by right median nerve electrical stimulation: a randomised controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 2023 Jun;49(6):633-644. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07072-1. Epub 2023 May 13.
PubMed 37178149Wu X, Zhang C, Feng J, Mao Q, Gao G, Jiang J. Right median nerve electrical stimulation for acute traumatic coma (the Asia Coma Electrical Stimulation trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Jul 10;18(1):311. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2045-x.
PubMed 28693604
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Jan 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Asia Coma Electrical Stimulation Trial: an Asian Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Right Median Nerve Stimulation for Traumatic Coma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02645578
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ACES / Renjineuro
- Conditions
- TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)
- Keywords
- Coma, traumatic brain injury, median nerve stimulation
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 360 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- RenJi HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, JSC National Center for Neurosurgery, Republic of Kazakhstan, College of Medical Sciences Teaching Hospital. Nepal
- Study start
- Jan 2016
- Primary completion
- Jun 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial from Asian countries to compare the effect and safety of right median nerve stimulation versus traditional treatment for comatose patients at the early stage following traumatic brain injury.
Detailed description
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity and one of the greatest unmet needs in public health. The most severe injury can lead to a poor outcome and prolonged coma of the victims. It is estimated that ten to fifteen percent of the severe TBI patients are discharged in a prolonged coma or a vegetative state. However, no treatment measure to data has been proven robustly to alter the pace of recovery or improve neurological outcome of the comatose patients following TBI.
Although right median nerve electrical stimulation (RMNS) has been used clinically for more than two decades, no strong evidence of efficacy was generated because of the limitations in the past trials including a small sample size or the inappropriate study design. In the present study, a multicenter research network with inclusion of neurotrauma centers from China, India, Nepal and Kazakhstan was established with the aim to validate the efficacy and safety of a promising intervention strategy for traumatic coma at early stage. Since RMNS is a simple, inexpensive, noninvasive technique with a good safety profile, our study will probably add more evidence to the treatment of traumatic coma in Asian countries.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| RMNS group | Experimental | Device: Right median nerve stimulationFocus intervention: right median nerve stimulation plus standard management |
| Control group | No intervention | –Standard management |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- A confirmed history of closed traumatic brain injury 10 days before enrollment
- A Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score of 4-8 or the motor part less than 5 if the patient received tracheotomy.
- 18-65 years of age
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Unstable vital signs
- Have a history of severe cardiac arrhythmias, implanted pacemaker, as well as seizures
- Pregnancy
- No informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Right median nerve stimulationAlso: RMNSRight median nerve electrical stimulation (RMNS) is administered via a pair of lubricated one-inch square rubber surface electrodes pasted on the volar aspect of the right distal forearm over the median nerve. An electrical neuromuscular stimulator supplied trains of asymmetric biphasic pluses at an amplitude of 20 milliamps with a pulse width of 300 microseconds at 40 Hz for 20 sec/min. The RMNS treatment continues 8 hours per day for two weeks. | Device | RMNS group |
Primary outcome
Proportion of patients returning consciousness
Time frame: Within six months after injury
The term "consciousness" is defined when the patient shows objective ability to respond to verbal commands.
6 secondary outcomes
Duration of unconsciousness
Time frame: Within six months after injury
Adverse events
Time frame: Within six months post injury
Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)
Time frame: 28 days post injury
Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R)
Time frame: six months post injury
Disability Rating Scale (DRS)
Time frame: six months post injury
Full Outline of UnResponsiveness scale(FOUR)
Time frame: 28 days post injury
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Jan 2016.
- Background: PubMed 25664378Lei J, Wang L, Gao G, Cooper E, Jiang J. Right Median Nerve Electrical Stimulation for Acute Traumatic Coma Patients. J Neurotrauma. 2015 Oct 15;32(20):1584-9. doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3768. Epub 2015 May 7.
- Background: PubMed 16350980Cooper EB, Scherder EJ, Cooper JB. Electrical treatment of reduced consciousness: experience with coma and Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2005 Jul-Sep;15(3-4):389-405. doi: 10.1080/09602010443000317.
- Background: PubMed 14518515Liu JT, Wang CH, Chou IC, Sun SS, Koa CH, Cooper E. Regaining consciousness for prolonged comatose patients with right median nerve stimulation. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2003;87:11-4. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6081-7_3.
- Background: PubMed 14518514Cooper EB, Cooper JB. Electrical treatment of coma via the median nerve. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2003;87:7-10. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6081-7_2.
- Background: PubMed 11595086Peri CV, Shaffrey ME, Farace E, Cooper E, Alves WM, Cooper JB, Young JS, Jane JA. Pilot study of electrical stimulation on median nerve in comatose severe brain injured patients: 3-month outcome. Brain Inj. 2001 Oct;15(10):903-10. doi: 10.1080/02699050110065709.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37178149Wu X, Xie L, Lei J, Yao J, Li J, Ruan L, Hong J, Zheng G, Cheng Y, Long L, Wang J, Huang C, Xie Q, Zhang X, He J, Yu X, Lv S, Sun Z, Liu D, Li X, Zhu J, Yang X, Wang D, Bao Y, Maas AIR, Menon D, Xue Y, Jiang J, Feng J, Gao G; ACES Participants. Acute traumatic coma awakening by right median nerve electrical stimulation: a randomised controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 2023 Jun;49(6):633-644. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07072-1. Epub 2023 May 13.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28693604Wu X, Zhang C, Feng J, Mao Q, Gao G, Jiang J. Right median nerve electrical stimulation for acute traumatic coma (the Asia Coma Electrical Stimulation trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Jul 10;18(1):311. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2045-x.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)
RecruitingPhase 1
Rehabilitation Through Virtual Immersion & Integrated Exposure for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (ReVIVE for mTBI)
Traumatic Brain Injuries, TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)
Recruiting
Feasibility and Acceptability of an LLM-based Chatbot for Family Caregivers: Evaluation Study
Caregivers
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Prospective Observational Multimodal Neuromonitoring in Adult NSICU Patients
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Aneurysmal, Brain Injuries, Traumatic
Not yet recruitingObservational study
The Systemic Nature of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Cognitive Effects of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) After a Traumatic Brain Injury
Traumatic Brain Injury, Post-Concussion Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Guoyi Gao contact
Jin Lei contact
Jiyao Jiang study chair
RenJi Hospital
Junfeng Feng study director
RenJi Hospital
Guoyi Gao principal investigator
RenJi Hospital
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Right median nerve stimulation in people with TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury), run by RenJi Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jan 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Guoyi Gao (guoyigao@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of patients returning consciousness (time frame: Within six months after injury). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02645578, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jan 2016.