Disorder of ConsciousnessConnectiviteNCT02647996
Functional Connectivity Measurement After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
An observational study of Disorder of Consciousness, run by University Hospital, Grenoble at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
To compare functional connectivity after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) between a group of post-comatose TBI with restored consciousness and a group of post-comatose TBI with persistant disorder of consciousness at admission in rehabilitation Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Disorder of Consciousness
- What is being tested?
- MRI: functional (resting state) and structural (DTI)
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 34 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Mar 2015to Oct 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: severe TBI admitted in ICU and ready to be discharged to rehabilitation with or without DOC
Who may be able to join
- severe TBI
- no general anesthesia since 7 days
- no neuroleptic nor hypnotic drug since 3 days
- medical criteria fulfilled to be discharged from ICU
- medical insurance
Who cannot join
- age < 18
- contra indication to MRI
- consent refusal from the family
- neurological trouble before TBI
- patient protected by law
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
To compare functional connectivity after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) between a group of post-comatose TBI with restored consciousness and a group of post-comatose TBI with persistant disorder of consciousness at admission in rehabilitation
Read the detailed description
Recovery of consciousness can be impaired in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Prognostic factors are sparse and mostly clinical (mainly the initial Glasgow coma scale GCS) (1). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) could allow a better understanding of functional recovery. Graph method has been applied to fMRI signal analysis in disorder of consciousness (DOC) due to post-anoxic encephalopathy. Comatose state was characterized by dramatic change in local connectivity (hub location) without significant change in global connectivity (2). The present study aims at describing functional connectivity in DOC following severe TBI. We will record resting state fMRI in TBI patients in two clinical conditions: conscious state versus DOC state.
- Conditions
- Disorder of Consciousness
- Being tested
- MRI: functional (resting state) and structural (DTI)
- Medical subject headings
- Consciousness Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MRI: functional (resting state) and structural (DTI)Procedure or surgery
One hour brain MRI recording without active task for the patient, no sedation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Conscious patients | group: TBI patients awoken from comatose state with normal level of consciousness.
intervention: fMRI (resting state) and structural (DTI) Receives: Procedure: MRI: functional (resting state) and structural (DTI) | |
| DOC patients | group: TBI patients awoken from comatose state with abnormal level of consciousness
intervention: fMRI (resting state) and structural (DTI) Receives: Procedure: MRI: functional (resting state) and structural (DTI) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
cortical functional connectivity
the index is calculated from methodology of the article cited below (2)
Measured: connectivity index measured on MRI recorded at discharge from intensive care unit (ICU) (30 days post-TBI on average) and compared between the two groups of patients (group "normal level of consciousness" versus group "disorder of consciousness")
Secondary outcomes (6)
consciousness level measured with Coma recovery scale -revised (CRS-R)
Measured: CRS-R score at discharge from intensive care unit (ICU) (30 days post-TBI on average)
consciousness level measured with Coma recovery scale -revised (CRS-R)
Measured: day 60 after first MRI
cortical functional connectivity change
Measured: connectivity index change (measured on MRI done day 60 after first MRI and compared to MRI done on day 0
Slow wave sleep quantification
Electroencephalographic recording on 12 consecutive hours by night
Measured: EEG at discharge from intensive care unit (ICU) (30 days post-TBI on average)
structural connectivity
fibers density between region of interest by DTI
Measured: DTI At discharge from intensive care unit (ICU) (30 days post-TBI on average)
structural connectivity
fibers density between region of interest by DTI
Measured: DTI day 60 after first MRI
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2015
- Primary completionJul 2018
- Study completionOct 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Disorder of ConsciousnessStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, GrenobleThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Grenoble
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Lydia Oujamaa, MD, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Grenoble
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02647996
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2014-A01873-44
- Acronym
- Connectivite
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 26 Feb 2015
- Last updated
- 20 Mar 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Nakase-Richardson R, Whyte J, Giacino JT, Pavawalla S, Barnett SD, Yablon SA, Sherer M, Kalmar K, Hammond FM, Greenwald B, Horn LJ, Seel R, McCarthy M, Tran J, Walker WC. Longitudinal outcome of patients with disordered consciousness in the NIDRR TBI Model Systems Programs. J Neurotrauma. 2012 Jan 1;29(1):59-65. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.1829. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
PubMed 21663544Achard S, Delon-Martin C, Vertes PE, Renard F, Schenck M, Schneider F, Heinrich C, Kremer S, Bullmore ET. Hubs of brain functional networks are radically reorganized in comatose patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Dec 11;109(50):20608-13. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1208933109. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
PubMed 23185007
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Mar 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Functional Connectivity Measurement After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02647996
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Connectivite / 2014-A01873-44
- Conditions
- Disorder of Consciousness
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, GrenobleUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To compare functional connectivity after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) between a group of post-comatose TBI with restored consciousness and a group of post-comatose TBI with persistant disorder of consciousness at admission in rehabilitation
Detailed description
Recovery of consciousness can be impaired in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Prognostic factors are sparse and mostly clinical (mainly the initial Glasgow coma scale GCS) (1). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) could allow a better understanding of functional recovery. Graph method has been applied to fMRI signal analysis in disorder of consciousness (DOC) due to post-anoxic encephalopathy. Comatose state was characterized by dramatic change in local connectivity (hub location) without significant change in global connectivity (2). The present study aims at describing functional connectivity in DOC following severe TBI. We will record resting state fMRI in TBI patients in two clinical conditions: conscious state versus DOC state.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Conscious patients | – | Procedure: MRI: functional (resting state) and structural (DTI)group: TBI patients awoken from comatose state with normal level of consciousness. intervention: fMRI (resting state) and structural (DTI) |
| DOC patients | – | Procedure: MRI: functional (resting state) and structural (DTI)group: TBI patients awoken from comatose state with abnormal level of consciousness intervention: fMRI (resting state) and structural (DTI) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- severe TBI admitted in ICU and ready to be discharged to rehabilitation with or without DOC
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- severe TBI
- no general anesthesia since 7 days
- no neuroleptic nor hypnotic drug since 3 days
- medical criteria fulfilled to be discharged from ICU
- medical insurance
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- age < 18
- contra indication to MRI
- consent refusal from the family
- neurological trouble before TBI
- patient protected by law
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MRI: functional (resting state) and structural (DTI)One hour brain MRI recording without active task for the patient, no sedation | Procedure or surgery | Conscious patients, DOC patients |
Primary outcome
cortical functional connectivity
Time frame: connectivity index measured on MRI recorded at discharge from intensive care unit (ICU) (30 days post-TBI on average) and compared between the two groups of patients (group "normal level of consciousness" versus group "disorder of consciousness")
the index is calculated from methodology of the article cited below (2)
6 secondary outcomes
consciousness level measured with Coma recovery scale -revised (CRS-R)
Time frame: CRS-R score at discharge from intensive care unit (ICU) (30 days post-TBI on average)
consciousness level measured with Coma recovery scale -revised (CRS-R)
Time frame: day 60 after first MRI
cortical functional connectivity change
Time frame: connectivity index change (measured on MRI done day 60 after first MRI and compared to MRI done on day 0
Slow wave sleep quantification
Time frame: EEG at discharge from intensive care unit (ICU) (30 days post-TBI on average)
structural connectivity
Time frame: DTI At discharge from intensive care unit (ICU) (30 days post-TBI on average)
structural connectivity
Time frame: DTI day 60 after first MRI
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Mar 2020.
- Background: PubMed 21663544Nakase-Richardson R, Whyte J, Giacino JT, Pavawalla S, Barnett SD, Yablon SA, Sherer M, Kalmar K, Hammond FM, Greenwald B, Horn LJ, Seel R, McCarthy M, Tran J, Walker WC. Longitudinal outcome of patients with disordered consciousness in the NIDRR TBI Model Systems Programs. J Neurotrauma. 2012 Jan 1;29(1):59-65. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.1829. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
- Background: PubMed 23185007Achard S, Delon-Martin C, Vertes PE, Renard F, Schenck M, Schneider F, Heinrich C, Kremer S, Bullmore ET. Hubs of brain functional networks are radically reorganized in comatose patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Dec 11;109(50):20608-13. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1208933109. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
Related trials for Disorder of Consciousness
RecruitingObservational study
Smartphone Enabled Detection of Cognitive Motor Dissociation in the ICU
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Patients, Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Not yet recruiting
Miniature In-line Respirator
Brain Death, Respiration, Artificial
RecruitingObservational study
Genetic Markers of Cardiovascular Disease in Epilepsy
Epilepsy, Seizures
Recruiting
Comprehensive Assessment of Rehabilitation Experience Using the SAFE Scale
Caregiver Anxiety, Acquired Brain Injury
RecruitingObservational study
Sleep to Predict Recovery In Unconscious Patients With Acute Brain Injury
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Patients, Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lydia Oujamaa, MD principal investigator
University Hospital, Grenoble
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Disorder of Consciousness, run by University Hospital, Grenoble at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
cortical functional connectivity (time frame: connectivity index measured on MRI recorded at discharge from intensive care unit (ICU) (30 days post-TBI on average) and compared between the two groups of patients (group "normal level of consciousness" versus group "disorder of consciousness")). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02647996, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Mar 2020.