Malignant Pleural MesotheliomaPhase 1/2MESODECNCT02649829
Autologous Dendritic Cell Vaccination in Mesothelioma
A Phase 1/2 study testing dendritic cell vaccination plus chemotherapy in people with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma, run by University Hospital, Antwerp at 3 sites in Belgium.
Trial summary
In this multicenter phase I/II trial, dendritic cells (DCs) loaded with the mesothelioma-associated tumor antigen WT1 will be used in conjunction with conventional chemotherapy for the frontline treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
- What is being tested?
- dendritic cell vaccination plus chemotherapy
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 28 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesBelgium
- Study dates
- 3 Oct 2017to 9 Mar 2025
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis with histologically proven epithelial
- Aged ≥ 18 years at the time of enrollment
- WHO performance status 0-1 at the time of enrollment
- Fit to undergo general anesthesia, a thoracoscopy, leukapheresis, chemotherapy, immunotherapy and P/D (in case of resectable disease)
- No history of receiving any investigational treatment within 28 days of study enrollment
- No history of intolerance to pemetrexed and/or cisplatin
Show all 9Show fewer
- Women of child bearing potential must have negative serum or urine pregnancy test at the time of screening. They should use adequate birth control measures, as defined by the investigator, during the study treatment period and for at least hundred days after the last study treatment. If pregnancy does occur within this time period, the Principal investigator must be informed as soon as possible. Female subjects who are breastfeeding should discontinue nursing prior to the first dose of study treatment and until hundred days after the last study treatment
- Absence of any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule; those conditions should be discusses with the patient before registration in the trial. Absence of any other inability or unwillingness to comply with the requirements of the protocol as assessed by the investigator
- Before patient registration written informed consent must be given according to ICH/GCP, and national/local regulations
Who cannot join
- Unwilling or unable to comply with the study requirements
- Prior treatment for MPM
- History of another malignancy within the last five years (except for carcinoma in situ of the cervix, basal cell or spinocellular carcinoma of the skin or unless the investigator rationalizes otherwise)
- Known proven metastases
- Known concomitant presence of any immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV) or any active autoimmune condition, except for vitiligo
- Pregnant or breast-feeding
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Belgium3 sites
Antwerp University Hospital
Edegem, Antwerp, 2650
AZ Middelares
Ghent, 9000
AZ Nikolaas
Sint-Niklaas, 9100
About this study
Official title: First-line Immunotherapy Using Wilms' Tumor Protein 1 (WT1)-Targeted Dendritic Cell Vaccinations for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
In this multicenter phase I/II trial, dendritic cells (DCs) loaded with the mesothelioma-associated tumor antigen WT1 will be used in conjunction with conventional chemotherapy for the frontline treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). The general objective is to provide the first-in-human experimental demonstration that the combination of platinum/pemetrexed-based chemotherapy with WT1-targeted DC vaccination is feasible and safe and enables the induction of both systemic and in situ mesothelioma-specific immune responses in patients with MPM.
Read the detailed description
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a highly aggressive and in virtually all cases fatal cancer that is tightly associated with prior asbestos exposure. Despite some improvement over time, the prognosis of patient diagnosed with MPM remains dismal with a median overall survival from diagnosis of only 12 months.
In this single arm phase I/II trial the investigators want to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of WT1-targeted dendritic cell vaccination in MPM patients as frontline treatment in conjunction with first line platinum/pemetrexed-based chemotherapy and the induction of both systemic and in situ mesothelioma-specific immune responses. During three years of recruitment the investigators aim at including 20 patients diagnosed with histologically proven epithelial MPM (WHO grade 0-1) who are able to undergo leukapheresis, chemotherapy, immunotherapy and pleurectomy/decortication (P/D; in case of resectable disease). Patients who underwent prior treatment for MPM or with a history of another malignancy within the last five years will be excluded.
The intention of this study is to administer four vaccine doses in combination with standard of care of four 3-weekly cytoreductive platinum/pemetrexed-based chemotherapy cycles to each participant and prior to surgery (P/D) in the case of resectable MPM. Patients will receive four 3-weekly intradermal vaccinations with autologous WT1 messenger (m)RNA-loaded dendritic cells (V1-4), at day 14 after the start of each chemotherapy cycle (CT1-4).
The dendritic cell therapy product will be generated and administered in the Antwerp University Hospital, more specifically the Center for Cell Therapy and Regenerative Medicine (CCRG) and the Division of Hematology, both headed by Prof. Zwi Berneman.
The DC vaccines will be under embargo from release until the safety and quality control test results have become available and all release criteria have been met. A detailed overview of all applicable release criteria is provided in the investigational medicinal product dossier. The embargo period generally lasts 3 weeks counting from the day of cryopreservation (i.e. 8 days after leukapheresis).
Recruitment started in August 2017. Study-related follow-up of the included patients is intended to be until 90 days after final DC vaccine administration or 22 months after diagnosis, whichever occurs later. In addition to feasibility and safety of the chemoimmunotherapy schedule, the investigators will look for the time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), systemic immunogenicity and local immunogenicity.
- Conditions
- Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
- Being tested
- dendritic cell vaccination plus chemotherapy
- Keywords
- dendritic cell vaccination, chemo-immunotherapy, Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1)
- Medical subject headings
- Mesothelioma, Malignant, Wilms Tumor
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
dendritic cell vaccination plus chemotherapyBiological
Also called chemoimmunotherapy
- Chemoimmunotherapy:
- four 3-weekly cycles of platinum/pemetrexed; on day 1 of each cycle, pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 should be administered as intravenous (IV) infusion over 10 minutes followed 30 minutes later by cisplatin 75 mg/m2 as IV over approximately 2 hours.
- four intradermal vaccinations with 8-10 x 10e6 autologous WT1 mRNA-loaded DCs; at day 14+/- 3 days after the start of each chemotherapy cycle.
- Surgery: pleurectomy/decortication; in case of resectable disease, 4-6 weeks after start of the last chemotherapy cycle.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Single Arm | Experimental | dendritic cell vaccination plus chemotherapy Receives: Biological: dendritic cell vaccination plus chemotherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of MPM patients with feasible and safe DC vaccine production
Production of autologous DC vaccines from newly diagnosed MPM patients will be evaluated for:
- Feasibility, assessed by success of leukapheresis and production of sufficient (i.e. at least 4 vaccines) and qualified (phenotypic and functional requirements) vaccines.
- Safety, assessed by microbiological testing (bacteria, yeast, fungi, mycoplasma, endotoxin) of the DC vaccines.
Measured: Vaccine production and quality testing (i.e. 4 weeks after leukapheresis)
Number of patients receiving investigational DC vaccine administration combined with standard of care chemotherapy within the proposed time frame
Administration of 4 autologous DC vaccines combined with four 3-weekly platinum/pemetrexed-based chemotherapy cycles will be evaluated for:
- Feasibility, assessed by successful administration of DC vaccines and prior to surgery in case of resectable disease.
- Safety, assessed by local (e.g. skin reactions at injection site) and systemic (toxicity grading according to the latest version of the CTCAE and CTC ) tolerability to the treatment.
Measured: After the chemoimmunotherapy treatment (+/- 15 weeks after entry to trial)
Secondary outcomes (4)
Objective clinical responses by tumor evaluation (clinical efficacy)
Objective clinical responses to the chemoimmunotherapy and, in case of resectable disease, after surgery as compared to baseline tumor evaluation prior to treatment (i.e. at diagnosis), will be evaluated with:
- radiographic assessments (CT imaging) of the tumor response using the modified RECIST criteria.
- FDG-PET assessments of the tumor response using the PERCIST criteria.
Patients will be followed for disease progression; time to progression (TTP) and progression-free survival (PFS).
Measured: Through study completion, at least after 4 DC vaccinations, prior to surgery (in case of resectable disease) + three months after the last intervention and within every 12 months during follow-up
Overall survival (clinical efficacy)
Patients will be followed for survival, from diagnosis and from start of treatment, for which the accurate date and reason of death (cancer-related or non-related) will be recorded for every patient.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Systemic immunogenicity
Systemic immunogenicity will be evaluated by:
- Detection of WT1-specific T cell immunity and innate immunity in peripheral blood.
- Response to delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) skin testing to the DC vaccine.
Measured: After the fourth DC vaccine (i.e. post chemoimmunotherapy, prior to surgery in case of resectable disease)
Local immunogenicity
Local immunogenicity will be evaluated by detection of immune profile in tumor biopsies and/or pleurectomy specimens (in case of resectable disease).
Measured: Upon surgery (P/D)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Study start3 Oct 2017
- Primary completion9 Mar 2025
- Study completion9 Mar 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (43)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Malignant Pleural MesotheliomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, AntwerpThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Antwerp
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Kom Op Tegen Kanker, Stichting tegen Kanker
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Zwi Berneman, University Hospital, Antwerp
- Investigators
- Zwi N Berneman, MD, PhD, Study director, Antwerp University Hospital, Division of Hematology and Center for Cell Therapy and Regenerative MedicineEva Lion, MSc, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Antwerp, Laboratory of Experimental HematologyEvelien LJ Smits, MSc, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Antwerp, Laboratory of Experimental HematologySébastien Anguille, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Antwerp University Hospital, Division of Hematology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02649829
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CCRG13-002
- Acronym
- MESODEC
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 7 Dec 2015
- Last updated
- 29 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Robinson BW, Musk AW, Lake RA. Malignant mesothelioma. Lancet. 2005 Jul 30-Aug 5;366(9483):397-408. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67025-0.
PubMed 16054941Robinson BW, Lake RA. Advances in malignant mesothelioma. N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 13;353(15):1591-603. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra050152. No abstract available.
PubMed 16221782Vogelzang NJ, Rusthoven JJ, Symanowski J, Denham C, Kaukel E, Ruffie P, Gatzemeier U, Boyer M, Emri S, Manegold C, Niyikiza C, Paoletti P. Phase III study of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jul 15;21(14):2636-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.11.136.
PubMed 12860938Musk AW, Olsen N, Alfonso H, Reid A, Mina R, Franklin P, Sleith J, Hammond N, Threlfall T, Shilkin KB, de Klerk NH. Predicting survival in malignant mesothelioma. Eur Respir J. 2011 Dec;38(6):1420-4. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00000811. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
PubMed 21737558Bagia M, Nowak AK. Novel targeted therapies and vaccination strategies for mesothelioma. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2011 Jun;12(2):149-62. doi: 10.1007/s11864-011-0149-1.
PubMed 21424750Bograd AJ, Suzuki K, Vertes E, Colovos C, Morales EA, Sadelain M, Adusumilli PS. Immune responses and immunotherapeutic interventions in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2011 Nov;60(11):1509-27. doi: 10.1007/s00262-011-1103-6. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
PubMed 21913025Izzi V, Masuelli L, Tresoldi I, Foti C, Modesti A, Bei R. Immunity and malignant mesothelioma: from mesothelial cell damage to tumor development and immune response-based therapies. Cancer Lett. 2012 Sep 1;322(1):18-34. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.02.034. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
PubMed 22394996Gregoire M. What's the place of immunotherapy in malignant mesothelioma treatments? Cell Adh Migr. 2010 Jan-Mar;4(1):153-61. doi: 10.4161/cam.4.1.11361. Epub 2010 Jan 30.
PubMed 20179421Kushitani K, Takeshima Y, Amatya VJ, Furonaka O, Sakatani A, Inai K. Immunohistochemical marker panels for distinguishing between epithelioid mesothelioma and lung adenocarcinoma. Pathol Int. 2007 Apr;57(4):190-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2007.02080.x.
PubMed 17316414Anguille S, Smits EL, Lion E, van Tendeloo VF, Berneman ZN. Clinical use of dendritic cells for cancer therapy. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jun;15(7):e257-67. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70585-0.
PubMed 24872109Hegmans JP, Hemmes A, Aerts JG, Hoogsteden HC, Lambrecht BN. Immunotherapy of murine malignant mesothelioma using tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cells. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 May 15;171(10):1168-77. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200501-057OC. Epub 2005 Mar 11.
PubMed 15764728Hegmans JP, Veltman JD, Lambers ME, de Vries IJ, Figdor CG, Hendriks RW, Hoogsteden HC, Lambrecht BN, Aerts JG. Consolidative dendritic cell-based immunotherapy elicits cytotoxicity against malignant mesothelioma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Jun 15;181(12):1383-90. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200909-1465OC. Epub 2010 Feb 18.
PubMed 20167848Smits EL, Anguille S, Cools N, Berneman ZN, Van Tendeloo VF. Dendritic cell-based cancer gene therapy. Hum Gene Ther. 2009 Oct;20(10):1106-18. doi: 10.1089/hum.2009.145.
PubMed 19656053Van Tendeloo VF, Ponsaerts P, Lardon F, Nijs G, Lenjou M, Van Broeckhoven C, Van Bockstaele DR, Berneman ZN. Highly efficient gene delivery by mRNA electroporation in human hematopoietic cells: superiority to lipofection and passive pulsing of mRNA and to electroporation of plasmid cDNA for tumor antigen loading of dendritic cells. Blood. 2001 Jul 1;98(1):49-56. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.1.49.
PubMed 11418462Van Tendeloo VF, Van de Velde A, Van Driessche A, Cools N, Anguille S, Ladell K, Gostick E, Vermeulen K, Pieters K, Nijs G, Stein B, Smits EL, Schroyens WA, Gadisseur AP, Vrelust I, Jorens PG, Goossens H, de Vries IJ, Price DA, Oji Y, Oka Y, Sugiyama H, Berneman ZN. Induction of complete and molecular remissions in acute myeloid leukemia by Wilms' tumor 1 antigen-targeted dendritic cell vaccination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Aug 3;107(31):13824-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008051107. Epub 2010 Jul 14.
PubMed 20631300
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- First-line Immunotherapy Using Wilms' Tumor Protein 1 (WT1)-Targeted Dendritic Cell Vaccinations for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02649829
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MESODEC / CCRG13-002
- Conditions
- Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
- Keywords
- dendritic cell vaccination, chemo-immunotherapy, Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1)
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, AntwerpUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Kom Op Tegen Kanker, Stichting tegen Kanker
- Study start
- 3 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 9 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 9 Mar 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In this multicenter phase I/II trial, dendritic cells (DCs) loaded with the mesothelioma-associated tumor antigen WT1 will be used in conjunction with conventional chemotherapy for the frontline treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). The general objective is to provide the first-in-human experimental demonstration that the combination of platinum/pemetrexed-based chemotherapy with WT1-targeted DC vaccination is feasible and safe and enables the induction of both systemic and in situ mesothelioma-specific immune responses in patients with MPM.
Detailed description
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a highly aggressive and in virtually all cases fatal cancer that is tightly associated with prior asbestos exposure. Despite some improvement over time, the prognosis of patient diagnosed with MPM remains dismal with a median overall survival from diagnosis of only 12 months.
In this single arm phase I/II trial the investigators want to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of WT1-targeted dendritic cell vaccination in MPM patients as frontline treatment in conjunction with first line platinum/pemetrexed-based chemotherapy and the induction of both systemic and in situ mesothelioma-specific immune responses. During three years of recruitment the investigators aim at including 20 patients diagnosed with histologically proven epithelial MPM (WHO grade 0-1) who are able to undergo leukapheresis, chemotherapy, immunotherapy and pleurectomy/decortication (P/D; in case of resectable disease). Patients who underwent prior treatment for MPM or with a history of another malignancy within the last five years will be excluded.
The intention of this study is to administer four vaccine doses in combination with standard of care of four 3-weekly cytoreductive platinum/pemetrexed-based chemotherapy cycles to each participant and prior to surgery (P/D) in the case of resectable MPM. Patients will receive four 3-weekly intradermal vaccinations with autologous WT1 messenger (m)RNA-loaded dendritic cells (V1-4), at day 14 after the start of each chemotherapy cycle (CT1-4).
The dendritic cell therapy product will be generated and administered in the Antwerp University Hospital, more specifically the Center for Cell Therapy and Regenerative Medicine (CCRG) and the Division of Hematology, both headed by Prof. Zwi Berneman.
The DC vaccines will be under embargo from release until the safety and quality control test results have become available and all release criteria have been met. A detailed overview of all applicable release criteria is provided in the investigational medicinal product dossier. The embargo period generally lasts 3 weeks counting from the day of cryopreservation (i.e. 8 days after leukapheresis).
Recruitment started in August 2017. Study-related follow-up of the included patients is intended to be until 90 days after final DC vaccine administration or 22 months after diagnosis, whichever occurs later. In addition to feasibility and safety of the chemoimmunotherapy schedule, the investigators will look for the time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), systemic immunogenicity and local immunogenicity.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Single Arm | Experimental | Biological: dendritic cell vaccination plus chemotherapydendritic cell vaccination plus chemotherapy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Diagnosis with histologically proven epithelial
- Aged ≥ 18 years at the time of enrollment
- WHO performance status 0-1 at the time of enrollment
- Fit to undergo general anesthesia, a thoracoscopy, leukapheresis, chemotherapy, immunotherapy and P/D (in case of resectable disease)
- No history of receiving any investigational treatment within 28 days of study enrollment
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Unwilling or unable to comply with the study requirements
- Prior treatment for MPM
- History of another malignancy within the last five years (except for carcinoma in situ of the cervix, basal cell or spinocellular carcinoma of the skin or unless the investigator rationalizes otherwise)
- Known proven metastases
- Known concomitant presence of any immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV) or any active autoimmune condition, except for vitiligo
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| dendritic cell vaccination plus chemotherapyAlso: chemoimmunotherapyA. Chemoimmunotherapy: 1. four 3-weekly cycles of platinum/pemetrexed; on day 1 of each cycle, pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 should be administered as intravenous (IV) infusion over 10 minutes followed 30 minutes later by cisplatin 75 mg/m2 as IV over approximately 2 hours. 2. four intradermal vaccinations with 8-10 x 10e6 autologous WT1 mRNA-loaded DCs; at day 14+/- 3 days after the start of each chemotherapy cycle. B. Surgery: pleurectomy/decortication; in case of resectable disease, 4-6 weeks after start of the last chemotherapy cycle. | Biological | Single Arm |
Primary outcome
Number of MPM patients with feasible and safe DC vaccine production
Time frame: Vaccine production and quality testing (i.e. 4 weeks after leukapheresis)
Production of autologous DC vaccines from newly diagnosed MPM patients will be evaluated for: 1. Feasibility, assessed by success of leukapheresis and production of sufficient (i.e. at least 4 vaccines) and qualified (phenotypic and functional requirements) vaccines. 2. Safety, assessed by microbiological testing (bacteria, yeast, fungi, mycoplasma, endotoxin) of the DC vaccines.
Number of patients receiving investigational DC vaccine administration combined with standard of care chemotherapy within the proposed time frame
Time frame: After the chemoimmunotherapy treatment (+/- 15 weeks after entry to trial)
Administration of 4 autologous DC vaccines combined with four 3-weekly platinum/pemetrexed-based chemotherapy cycles will be evaluated for: 1. Feasibility, assessed by successful administration of DC vaccines and prior to surgery in case of resectable disease. 2. Safety, assessed by local (e.g. skin reactions at injection site) and systemic (toxicity grading according to the latest version of the CTCAE and CTC ) tolerability to the treatment.
4 secondary outcomes
Objective clinical responses by tumor evaluation (clinical efficacy)
Time frame: Through study completion, at least after 4 DC vaccinations, prior to surgery (in case of resectable disease) + three months after the last intervention and within every 12 months during follow-up
Overall survival (clinical efficacy)
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Systemic immunogenicity
Time frame: After the fourth DC vaccine (i.e. post chemoimmunotherapy, prior to surgery in case of resectable disease)
Local immunogenicity
Time frame: Upon surgery (P/D)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Apr 2025.
- Background: PubMed 16054941Robinson BW, Musk AW, Lake RA. Malignant mesothelioma. Lancet. 2005 Jul 30-Aug 5;366(9483):397-408. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67025-0.
- Background: PubMed 16221782Robinson BW, Lake RA. Advances in malignant mesothelioma. N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 13;353(15):1591-603. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra050152. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 12860938Vogelzang NJ, Rusthoven JJ, Symanowski J, Denham C, Kaukel E, Ruffie P, Gatzemeier U, Boyer M, Emri S, Manegold C, Niyikiza C, Paoletti P. Phase III study of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jul 15;21(14):2636-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.11.136.
- Background: PubMed 21737558Musk AW, Olsen N, Alfonso H, Reid A, Mina R, Franklin P, Sleith J, Hammond N, Threlfall T, Shilkin KB, de Klerk NH. Predicting survival in malignant mesothelioma. Eur Respir J. 2011 Dec;38(6):1420-4. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00000811. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
- Background: PubMed 21424750Bagia M, Nowak AK. Novel targeted therapies and vaccination strategies for mesothelioma. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2011 Jun;12(2):149-62. doi: 10.1007/s11864-011-0149-1.
- Background: PubMed 21913025Bograd AJ, Suzuki K, Vertes E, Colovos C, Morales EA, Sadelain M, Adusumilli PS. Immune responses and immunotherapeutic interventions in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2011 Nov;60(11):1509-27. doi: 10.1007/s00262-011-1103-6. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
- Background: PubMed 22394996Izzi V, Masuelli L, Tresoldi I, Foti C, Modesti A, Bei R. Immunity and malignant mesothelioma: from mesothelial cell damage to tumor development and immune response-based therapies. Cancer Lett. 2012 Sep 1;322(1):18-34. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.02.034. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
- Background: PubMed 20179421Gregoire M. What's the place of immunotherapy in malignant mesothelioma treatments? Cell Adh Migr. 2010 Jan-Mar;4(1):153-61. doi: 10.4161/cam.4.1.11361. Epub 2010 Jan 30.
- Background: PubMed 17316414Kushitani K, Takeshima Y, Amatya VJ, Furonaka O, Sakatani A, Inai K. Immunohistochemical marker panels for distinguishing between epithelioid mesothelioma and lung adenocarcinoma. Pathol Int. 2007 Apr;57(4):190-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2007.02080.x.
- Background: PubMed 24872109Anguille S, Smits EL, Lion E, van Tendeloo VF, Berneman ZN. Clinical use of dendritic cells for cancer therapy. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jun;15(7):e257-67. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70585-0.
- Background: PubMed 15764728Hegmans JP, Hemmes A, Aerts JG, Hoogsteden HC, Lambrecht BN. Immunotherapy of murine malignant mesothelioma using tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cells. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 May 15;171(10):1168-77. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200501-057OC. Epub 2005 Mar 11.
- Background: PubMed 20167848Hegmans JP, Veltman JD, Lambers ME, de Vries IJ, Figdor CG, Hendriks RW, Hoogsteden HC, Lambrecht BN, Aerts JG. Consolidative dendritic cell-based immunotherapy elicits cytotoxicity against malignant mesothelioma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Jun 15;181(12):1383-90. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200909-1465OC. Epub 2010 Feb 18.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Efficacy and Safety of Ivonescimab Plus Pemetrexed and Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Advanced Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma, Advanced
RecruitingPhase 2
The Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Value of FAPI PET in Pleural Mesothelioma
Pleural Mesothelioma, Pleural Diseases
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Safety and Preliminary Antitumor Activity of Ivonescimab Plus Pemetrexed and Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Advanced Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma, Advanced
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Beta-only IL-2 ImmunoTherapY Study
Advanced Solid Tumor, Unresectable Solid Tumor
RecruitingPhase 1
SW-682 in Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced Solid Tumor, Mesothelioma, Malignant
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Zwi N Berneman, MD, PhD study director
Antwerp University Hospital, Division of Hematology and Center for Cell Therapy and Regenerative Medicine
Eva Lion, MSc, PhD principal investigator
University of Antwerp, Laboratory of Experimental Hematology
Evelien LJ Smits, MSc, PhD principal investigator
University of Antwerp, Laboratory of Experimental Hematology
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing dendritic cell vaccination plus chemotherapy in people with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma, run by University Hospital, Antwerp at 3 sites in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of MPM patients with feasible and safe DC vaccine production (time frame: Vaccine production and quality testing (i.e. 4 weeks after leukapheresis)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02649829, which also lists 43 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2025.