Gut MicrobiomeNCT02655250
Neonatal Microbiome Validity Study
An observational study of Gut Microbiome, run by State University of New York at Buffalo at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a validation study to compare proposed field collection methods with a gold standard collection technique for microbiome analysis of stool and breast milk samples. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Gut Microbiome
- What is being tested?
- Microbiome
- How many people
- 5 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2015to Dec 2017
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: A convenience sample of men/women willing to provide a stool sample and/or breast milk sample.
Who may be able to join
- Lactating women (for breast milk sample)
Who cannot join
- None
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
State University of New York at Buffalo, Farber Hall
Buffalo, New York, 14214
About this study
Official title: The Neonatal Microbiome Study: Validity of Biologic Sample Collection Methods
This is a validation study to compare proposed field collection methods with a gold standard collection technique for microbiome analysis of stool and breast milk samples.
Read the detailed description
In order to conduct a future study of the gut microbiome in a population living in a rural, low income setting, this validation study will be conducted to verify the validity of our proposed field collection methods for stool and breast milk samples. We will compare the microbial diversity and abundance in the biologic samples using various proposed field collection methods to an immediately frozen sample. The proposed field collection methods are feasible for use in a community-based study in a low income setting with limited access to cold storage.
- Conditions
- Gut Microbiome
- Being tested
- Microbiome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MicrobiomeOther
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Difference in intestinal microbiome between gold standard and proposed field protocol
Comparison of microbiome from snap-frozen sample (gold standard) to proposed field collection methods to determine which field method best correlates with the snap-frozen sample.
Measured: Baseline
Difference in breast milk microbiome between gold standard and proposed field protocol
Comparison of microbiome from snap-frozen sample to proposed field collection methods to determine which field method best correlates with the snap-frozen sample.
Measured: Baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2015
- Primary completionAug 2016
- Study completionDec 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Gut MicrobiomeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- State University of New York at Buffalo
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Amy E. Millen, State University of New York at Buffalo
- Investigators
- Amy E Millen, PhD, Principal investigator, State University of New York at Buffalo
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02655250
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 758632-1
- Status last verified
- Oct 2020
- First submitted
- 19 Jun 2015
- Last updated
- 27 Oct 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Oct 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Neonatal Microbiome Study: Validity of Biologic Sample Collection Methods
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02655250
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 758632-1
- Conditions
- Gut Microbiome
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- State University of New York at BuffaloUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Aug 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a validation study to compare proposed field collection methods with a gold standard collection technique for microbiome analysis of stool and breast milk samples.
Detailed description
In order to conduct a future study of the gut microbiome in a population living in a rural, low income setting, this validation study will be conducted to verify the validity of our proposed field collection methods for stool and breast milk samples. We will compare the microbial diversity and abundance in the biologic samples using various proposed field collection methods to an immediately frozen sample. The proposed field collection methods are feasible for use in a community-based study in a low income setting with limited access to cold storage.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- A convenience sample of men/women willing to provide a stool sample and/or breast milk sample.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Lactating women (for breast milk sample)
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- None
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Microbiome | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Difference in intestinal microbiome between gold standard and proposed field protocol
Time frame: Baseline
Comparison of microbiome from snap-frozen sample (gold standard) to proposed field collection methods to determine which field method best correlates with the snap-frozen sample.
Difference in breast milk microbiome between gold standard and proposed field protocol
Time frame: Baseline
Comparison of microbiome from snap-frozen sample to proposed field collection methods to determine which field method best correlates with the snap-frozen sample.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Oct 2020.
Related trials for Gut Microbiome
RecruitingObservational study
Avera Cancer Sequencing and Analytics Protocol (ASAP)
Cancer, Cancer Diagnosis
Not yet recruiting
Cancer Nutrition Study - A Study of Dietary Interventions in Cancer Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
Solid Tumor Cancer, Immune-Related Adverse Events
Recruiting
Digestion and Absorption of Postbiotic Regulatory Proteins
Protein Utilization
RecruitingObservational study
Impact of Delivery Mode on Infant Gut Microbiota, Visceral Sensitivity, and the Neuroenteric System
Healthy Newborn Infants
Recruiting
Effect of a Probiotic or Postbiotic on Gut Microbiome During Antibiotic Treatment
Microbiome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Amy E Millen, PhD principal investigator
State University of New York at Buffalo
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Gut Microbiome, run by State University of New York at Buffalo at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Difference in intestinal microbiome between gold standard and proposed field protocol (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Oct 2020.