Obsessive-Compulsive DisorderNCT02655926
Deep Brain Stimulation for Severe Obsessive Compulsive Disorder
A study testing Deep Brain Stimulation in people with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, run by University College, London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The overarching aim is to compare the effects of ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS) and subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the same participants. Investigators will test the hypothesis, grounded in cognitive neuroscience, that DBS at both sites is better than either site alone for treating… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Deep Brain Stimulation
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 6 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Sep 2012to Nov 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants must have undergone intensive treatment and have demonstrable treatment resistance as defined by:
- At least two serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRI) for a minimum of 12 weeks at optimal British National Formulary (BNF) doses.
- Augmentation of SRI treatment with antipsychotic drugs administered at maximally tolerated doses or by extending the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) dose beyond BNF limits.
- Two trials of CBT of at least 10 hours.
- Failed inpatient treatment for OCD.
- Participants must be older than 20 years of age.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Confirmation of a primary diagnosis of obsessive compulsive disorder (International Classification of Diseases (ICD 10) F42.0-F42.9).
- Duration of OCD of at least 10 years.
- At least 2 years of unremitting symptoms despite intensive psychopharmacological and psychological treatment or failure to sustain, over a 3 month period, a response to inpatient psychological treatment by at least 33% with accompanying optimised pharmacological therapy.
- A minimum score of 32 on Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) thus constituting profound illness and a maximum score of 50 on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM IV) General Assessment of Function Scale (GAF).
- Ability to provide sustained informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Current diagnosis of Substance misuse (ICD10 F10-F19)
- Current diagnosis of Organic brain syndrome (ICD10 F00-F09)
- Current diagnosis of Adult personality disorder (ICD10 F60-F69)
- Current diagnosis of Pervasive developmental disorder (ICD10 F84)
- Current diagnosis of Schizophrenia (ICD10 F20-F29)
- Current diagnosis of Bipolar disorder (ICD 10 F30-31)
- Contraindications to neurosurgery
- Pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Deep Brain Stimulation for Severe Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: Efficacy and Mechanisms of Ventral Striatum and Subthalamic Nucleus Targets
The overarching aim is to compare the effects of ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS) and subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the same participants. Investigators will test the hypothesis, grounded in cognitive neuroscience, that DBS at both sites is better than either site alone for treating the symptom dimensions of obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). Specifically, Investigators will employ novel cognitive paradigms and neurophysiological measures of cortical synaptic function to test the hypothesis that VS/VC and STN DBS have different mechanisms of action and that alleviation of OCD symptoms is mediated by improvement in mood/anxiety with VS/VC DBS and by directly interrupting obsessions and compulsions with STN DBS. Investigators will additionally determine whether adjunctive cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) enhances the response to DBS by providing the cognitive and behavioural skills to optimise symptom management and daily function.
Read the detailed description
The VS/VC and STN are both 'stations' in the neural circuitry thought to be dysfunctional in OCD. The pre-eminent neurobiological model of OCD implicates abnormalities of orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and ventral striatum. These structures are integral to limbic cortico-striatal-thalamo-cortical circuitry whereby cortical outputs synapse successively in ventral striatum, ventral pallidum and mediodorsal nucleus of thalamus before projecting back to cortex; within this system, the pallidum projects to thalamus either directly or indirectly via the subthalamic nucleus. It is therefore possible that the observed clinical improvement in OCD with DBS is due to high frequency electrical stimulation disrupting abnormal activity in the limbic circuit and that this can be obtained at either of the two target sites. However, the ventral striatum and STN are thought to have separate functions, important in different ways for modulating information processing in the cortico-striatal-thalamo-cortical circuitry essential for the control of behaviour. Thus, although both VS/VC and STN DBS affect the same neural circuit, their mechanism of action may be quite different and stimulation at each of these locations may have unique effects on the symptom dimensions of OCD.
Evidence for different clinical effects comes from findings that VS/VC DBS produced early and sometimes dramatic mood elevation and anxiety reduction prior to improvement in obsessions and compulsions whereas STN DBS, while diminishing obsessions and compulsions, had no effect on emotion. This observation is relevant because mood and anxiety are significant symptom dimensions in OCD and increases or decreases in the severity of anxiety or depression are generally accompanied by parallel changes in the severity of obsessions/compulsions. The ventral striatum, as well as being the first target of OFC/ACC cortical outputs, receives inputs from amygdala and midbrain dopaminergic neurones, which together provide the emotional and motivational impetus for goal directed behaviour. The ventral striatum is therefore in a unique position, via its involvement in limbic cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical circuitry, to influence the cognitive and motor processing in parallel circuits which is preparatory for action selection and ultimately manifest in thoughts and actions. Denys and colleagues proposed that VS/VC DBS influences OCD symptoms via its effect on anxiety and mood. Taking this further, Investigators hypothesize that stimulation of ventral striatal neurones influences reinforcement learning and emotion processing thereby improving mood and reducing anxiety and resulting in a decrease in the intensity of obsessions and compulsions.
STN DBS on the other hand may have a more direct effect on obsessions and compulsions. The limbic STN, like the ventral striatum, is in a unique position to influence behavioural outputs of cortico-striatal-thalamo-cortical circuitry. This is because the STN receives a direct projection from right inferior frontal cortex which acts as a 'hyperdirect pathway', activation of which overrides neural processing in the direct cortico-striato-pallido-thalamic pathway. This results in the inhibition of ongoing, planned acts and thoughts. Investigators therefore hypothesise that, via this inhibitory mechanism, stimulation of STN neurones enables OCD patients to interrupt their repetitive thoughts and actions resulting in a decrease in obsessions and compulsions.
Accordingly, DBS at both sites, because of different mechanisms of action, is predicted to be clinically more effective than stimulation of either site alone. It also follows that if there are two mechanisms mediating OCD improvement, this should be evident in different patterns of cognitive and neurophysiological effects following DBS. In the proposed study Investigators will test these predictions clinically and experimentally by using paradigms designed to distinguish the two hypothetical mechanisms of action.
The main aim of CBT is to enable OCD patients to obtain greater control over behaviour so that they can inhibit their repetitive thoughts and acts and switch to more meaningful alternatives. One abnormal mechanism contributing to such cognitive inflexibility is thought to be blunting of the value of positive and negative reinforcement normally used to guide responses and dependent on intact OFC-striatal neural circuitry. Dysfunction of this cognitive control system has been shown in first-degree clinically unaffected relatives of OCD patients thus confirming this mechanism as a neurobiological phenotype of OCD 15.It is therefore hypothesised that DBS of VS/VC will improve the processing of reinforcing stimuli and that this will result not only in elevation of mood and reduction in anxiety but also in increased cognitive flexibility. Investigators will test this by measuring the effectiveness of VS/VC DBS on clinical measures of mood, anxiety, obsessions and compulsions and relate these to changes in reinforcement learning and emotional processing using cognitive tasks sensitive to OCD which measure the ability to respond appropriately to reinforcing contingencies.
Attentional processes are also thought to contribute to impaired behavioural control in OCD. Being able to stop or inhibit planned acts when environmental circumstances change depends on the function of the right inferior cortical-STN hyperdirect pathway and can be operationalised by measuring the stop signal reaction time (SSRT). The finding of specific prolongation of SSRT in OCD patients and their unaffected first-degree relatives suggests that this cognitive abnormality is also a phenotype of OCD. Although the neural substrate of this mechanism does not involve the limbic cortico-striato-pallido-thalamic circuit, recent evidence suggests that neural systems outside this circuitry, involving the right inferior frontal cortex, are impaired in OCD. Investigators therefore hypothesise that STN DBS allows inhibition of repetitive thoughts and acts in OCD by facilitating the action of the hyperdirect pathway from the right inferior frontal cortex to STN. Investigators will test this by measuring the effectiveness of STN DBS on obsessions and compulsions and relate these to changes in SSRT and performance on other tasks sensitive to right inferior frontal cortex function which measure the ability to inhibit pre-potent tendencies.
OCD symptoms and cognitive impairment may be mediated by abnormal cortical excitability due to aberrant long term depression (LTD) synaptic plasticity and/or reduced gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) mediated intracortical inhibition. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be used to measure these neurophysiological processes safely in patients undergoing DBS and both abnormalities have been shown to normalise following DBS in other disorders. Investigators will use TMS to assess these neural processes before and after DBS in OCD patients and test for whether there are differential changes from the two DBS sites and whether combined VS/VC and STN DBS produces more vigorous improvements compatible with our hypothesis concerning the superior clinical effects of this condition. Investigators will measure intracortical inhibition not only at rest but also during the anticipation of reinforcement, previously shown to affect motor cortex excitability and which Investigators predict will be specifically affected by VS/VC DBS.
- Conditions
- Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
- Being tested
- Deep Brain Stimulation
- Keywords
- OCD, DBS, Deep Brain Stimulation
- Medical subject headings
- Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Deep Brain StimulationProcedure or surgery
Also called DBS
Participants undergo implantation of bilateral electrodes at both the VS/VC and STN sites through a single burr hole under general anaesthesia. High-resolution MRI scans are used to calculate target coordinates and to verify accurate electrode location post-surgery. Each STN electrode have 4 electrical contacts at its distal tip (with a 0.5mm separation) and each VS/VC electrode have 4 electrical contacts at its distal tip (with a 1.5mm separation) to allow fine tuning of the exact site for stimulation delivery. Two non-rechargeable batteries (Activa PC) are connected to the electrodes and positioned under the skin of the right and left chest wall so that they correspond to the same set of electrodes for each patient: one for the 2 STN electrodes and one for the 2 VC/VS electrodes.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| STN Arm | Active comparator | Participants would only have STN deep brain stimulation switched at optimal settings for that participant on for 12 weeks. Receives: Procedure: Deep Brain Stimulation |
| VC/VS Arm | Active comparator | Participants would only have VC/VS deep brain stimulation switched on at optimal settings for that participant for 12 weeks. Receives: Procedure: Deep Brain Stimulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Improvement of OCD symptoms on YBOCS scale greater than or equal to 35%
Measured: 15 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2012
- Primary completionNov 2016
- Study completionNov 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Obsessive-Compulsive DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University College, LondonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 6 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University College, London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Eileen M Joyce, PhD, Principal investigator, University College, London
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02655926
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 12/0226
- Other IDs
- MR/J012009/1, 12/LO/1087, 105869, 18430630
- Status last verified
- Jul 2015
- First submitted
- 17 Jul 2015
- Last updated
- 3 Mar 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Storch EA, Murphy TK, Geffken GR, Sajid M, Allen P, Roberti JW, Goodman WK. Reliability and validity of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale. Psychol Assess. 2005 Dec;17(4):486-91. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.486.
PubMed 16393016Storch EA, Rasmussen SA, Price LH, Larson MJ, Murphy TK, Goodman WK. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale--Second Edition. Psychol Assess. 2010 Jun;22(2):223-32. doi: 10.1037/a0018492.
PubMed 20528050Welter ML, Mallet L, Houeto JL, Karachi C, Czernecki V, Cornu P, Navarro S, Pidoux B, Dormont D, Bardinet E, Yelnik J, Damier P, Agid Y. Internal pallidal and thalamic stimulation in patients with Tourette syndrome. Arch Neurol. 2008 Jul;65(7):952-7. doi: 10.1001/archneur.65.7.952.
PubMed 18625864Stefani A, Lozano AM, Peppe A, Stanzione P, Galati S, Tropepi D, Pierantozzi M, Brusa L, Scarnati E, Mazzone P. Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the pedunculopontine and subthalamic nuclei in severe Parkinson's disease. Brain. 2007 Jun;130(Pt 6):1596-607. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl346. Epub 2007 Jan 24.
PubMed 17251240Ferraye MU, Debu B, Fraix V, Goetz L, Ardouin C, Yelnik J, Henry-Lagrange C, Seigneuret E, Piallat B, Krack P, Le Bas JF, Benabid AL, Chabardes S, Pollak P. Effects of pedunculopontine nucleus area stimulation on gait disorders in Parkinson's disease. Brain. 2010 Jan;133(Pt 1):205-14. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp229. Epub 2009 Sep 22.
PubMed 19773356Cif L, Biolsi B, Gavarini S, Saux A, Robles SG, Tancu C, Vasques X, Coubes P. Antero-ventral internal pallidum stimulation improves behavioral disorders in Lesch-Nyhan disease. Mov Disord. 2007 Oct 31;22(14):2126-9. doi: 10.1002/mds.21723.
PubMed 17853483Krack P. Subthalamic stimulation for Parkinson's disease: a new benchmark. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;82(4):356-7. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2010.222497. Epub 2011 Feb 18. No abstract available.
PubMed 21335569Morein-Zamir S, Craig KJ, Ersche KD, Abbott S, Muller U, Fineberg NA, Bullmore ET, Sahakian BJ, Robbins TW. Impaired visuospatial associative memory and attention in obsessive compulsive disorder but no evidence for differential dopaminergic modulation. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2010 Oct;212(3):357-67. doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-1963-z. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
PubMed 20661550Robbins TW. Shifting and stopping: fronto-striatal substrates, neurochemical modulation and clinical implications. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 May 29;362(1481):917-32. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2097.
PubMed 17412678
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Mar 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Deep Brain Stimulation for Severe Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: Efficacy and Mechanisms of Ventral Striatum and Subthalamic Nucleus Targets
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02655926
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 12/0226
- Conditions
- Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
- Keywords
- OCD, DBS, Deep Brain Stimulation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 6 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University College, LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2012
- Primary completion
- Nov 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The overarching aim is to compare the effects of ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS) and subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the same participants. Investigators will test the hypothesis, grounded in cognitive neuroscience, that DBS at both sites is better than either site alone for treating the symptom dimensions of obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). Specifically, Investigators will employ novel cognitive paradigms and neurophysiological measures of cortical synaptic function to test the hypothesis that VS/VC and STN DBS have different mechanisms of action and that alleviation of OCD symptoms is mediated by improvement in mood/anxiety with VS/VC DBS and by directly interrupting obsessions and compulsions with STN DBS. Investigators will additionally determine whether adjunctive cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) enhances the response to DBS by providing the cognitive and behavioural skills to optimise symptom management and daily function.
Detailed description
The VS/VC and STN are both 'stations' in the neural circuitry thought to be dysfunctional in OCD. The pre-eminent neurobiological model of OCD implicates abnormalities of orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and ventral striatum. These structures are integral to limbic cortico-striatal-thalamo-cortical circuitry whereby cortical outputs synapse successively in ventral striatum, ventral pallidum and mediodorsal nucleus of thalamus before projecting back to cortex; within this system, the pallidum projects to thalamus either directly or indirectly via the subthalamic nucleus. It is therefore possible that the observed clinical improvement in OCD with DBS is due to high frequency electrical stimulation disrupting abnormal activity in the limbic circuit and that this can be obtained at either of the two target sites. However, the ventral striatum and STN are thought to have separate functions, important in different ways for modulating information processing in the cortico-striatal-thalamo-cortical circuitry essential for the control of behaviour. Thus, although both VS/VC and STN DBS affect the same neural circuit, their mechanism of action may be quite different and stimulation at each of these locations may have unique effects on the symptom dimensions of OCD.
Evidence for different clinical effects comes from findings that VS/VC DBS produced early and sometimes dramatic mood elevation and anxiety reduction prior to improvement in obsessions and compulsions whereas STN DBS, while diminishing obsessions and compulsions, had no effect on emotion. This observation is relevant because mood and anxiety are significant symptom dimensions in OCD and increases or decreases in the severity of anxiety or depression are generally accompanied by parallel changes in the severity of obsessions/compulsions. The ventral striatum, as well as being the first target of OFC/ACC cortical outputs, receives inputs from amygdala and midbrain dopaminergic neurones, which together provide the emotional and motivational impetus for goal directed behaviour. The ventral striatum is therefore in a unique position, via its involvement in limbic cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical circuitry, to influence the cognitive and motor processing in parallel circuits which is preparatory for action selection and ultimately manifest in thoughts and actions. Denys and colleagues proposed that VS/VC DBS influences OCD symptoms via its effect on anxiety and mood. Taking this further, Investigators hypothesize that stimulation of ventral striatal neurones influences reinforcement learning and emotion processing thereby improving mood and reducing anxiety and resulting in a decrease in the intensity of obsessions and compulsions.
STN DBS on the other hand may have a more direct effect on obsessions and compulsions. The limbic STN, like the ventral striatum, is in a unique position to influence behavioural outputs of cortico-striatal-thalamo-cortical circuitry. This is because the STN receives a direct projection from right inferior frontal cortex which acts as a 'hyperdirect pathway', activation of which overrides neural processing in the direct cortico-striato-pallido-thalamic pathway. This results in the inhibition of ongoing, planned acts and thoughts. Investigators therefore hypothesise that, via this inhibitory mechanism, stimulation of STN neurones enables OCD patients to interrupt their repetitive thoughts and actions resulting in a decrease in obsessions and compulsions.
Accordingly, DBS at both sites, because of different mechanisms of action, is predicted to be clinically more effective than stimulation of either site alone. It also follows that if there are two mechanisms mediating OCD improvement, this should be evident in different patterns of cognitive and neurophysiological effects following DBS. In the proposed study Investigators will test these predictions clinically and experimentally by using paradigms designed to distinguish the two hypothetical mechanisms of action.
The main aim of CBT is to enable OCD patients to obtain greater control over behaviour so that they can inhibit their repetitive thoughts and acts and switch to more meaningful alternatives. One abnormal mechanism contributing to such cognitive inflexibility is thought to be blunting of the value of positive and negative reinforcement normally used to guide responses and dependent on intact OFC-striatal neural circuitry. Dysfunction of this cognitive control system has been shown in first-degree clinically unaffected relatives of OCD patients thus confirming this mechanism as a neurobiological phenotype of OCD 15.It is therefore hypothesised that DBS of VS/VC will improve the processing of reinforcing stimuli and that this will result not only in elevation of mood and reduction in anxiety but also in increased cognitive flexibility. Investigators will test this by measuring the effectiveness of VS/VC DBS on clinical measures of mood, anxiety, obsessions and compulsions and relate these to changes in reinforcement learning and emotional processing using cognitive tasks sensitive to OCD which measure the ability to respond appropriately to reinforcing contingencies.
Attentional processes are also thought to contribute to impaired behavioural control in OCD. Being able to stop or inhibit planned acts when environmental circumstances change depends on the function of the right inferior cortical-STN hyperdirect pathway and can be operationalised by measuring the stop signal reaction time (SSRT). The finding of specific prolongation of SSRT in OCD patients and their unaffected first-degree relatives suggests that this cognitive abnormality is also a phenotype of OCD. Although the neural substrate of this mechanism does not involve the limbic cortico-striato-pallido-thalamic circuit, recent evidence suggests that neural systems outside this circuitry, involving the right inferior frontal cortex, are impaired in OCD. Investigators therefore hypothesise that STN DBS allows inhibition of repetitive thoughts and acts in OCD by facilitating the action of the hyperdirect pathway from the right inferior frontal cortex to STN. Investigators will test this by measuring the effectiveness of STN DBS on obsessions and compulsions and relate these to changes in SSRT and performance on other tasks sensitive to right inferior frontal cortex function which measure the ability to inhibit pre-potent tendencies.
OCD symptoms and cognitive impairment may be mediated by abnormal cortical excitability due to aberrant long term depression (LTD) synaptic plasticity and/or reduced gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) mediated intracortical inhibition. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be used to measure these neurophysiological processes safely in patients undergoing DBS and both abnormalities have been shown to normalise following DBS in other disorders. Investigators will use TMS to assess these neural processes before and after DBS in OCD patients and test for whether there are differential changes from the two DBS sites and whether combined VS/VC and STN DBS produces more vigorous improvements compatible with our hypothesis concerning the superior clinical effects of this condition. Investigators will measure intracortical inhibition not only at rest but also during the anticipation of reinforcement, previously shown to affect motor cortex excitability and which Investigators predict will be specifically affected by VS/VC DBS.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| STN Arm | Active comparator | Procedure: Deep Brain StimulationParticipants would only have STN deep brain stimulation switched at optimal settings for that participant on for 12 weeks. |
| VC/VS Arm | Active comparator | Procedure: Deep Brain StimulationParticipants would only have VC/VS deep brain stimulation switched on at optimal settings for that participant for 12 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Participants must have undergone intensive treatment and have demonstrable treatment resistance as defined by:
- Participants must be older than 20 years of age.
- Confirmation of a primary diagnosis of obsessive compulsive disorder (International Classification of Diseases (ICD 10) F42.0-F42.9).
- Duration of OCD of at least 10 years.
- At least 2 years of unremitting symptoms despite intensive psychopharmacological and psychological treatment or failure to sustain, over a 3 month period, a response to inpatient psychological treatment by at least 33% with accompanying optimised pharmacological therapy.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Current diagnosis of Substance misuse (ICD10 F10-F19)
- Current diagnosis of Organic brain syndrome (ICD10 F00-F09)
- Current diagnosis of Adult personality disorder (ICD10 F60-F69)
- Current diagnosis of Pervasive developmental disorder (ICD10 F84)
- Current diagnosis of Schizophrenia (ICD10 F20-F29)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Deep Brain StimulationAlso: DBSParticipants undergo implantation of bilateral electrodes at both the VS/VC and STN sites through a single burr hole under general anaesthesia. High-resolution MRI scans are used to calculate target coordinates and to verify accurate electrode location post-surgery. Each STN electrode have 4 electrical contacts at its distal tip (with a 0.5mm separation) and each VS/VC electrode have 4 electrical contacts at its distal tip (with a 1.5mm separation) to allow fine tuning of the exact site for stimulation delivery. Two non-rechargeable batteries (Activa PC) are connected to the electrodes and positioned under the skin of the right and left chest wall so that they correspond to the same set of electrodes for each patient: one for the 2 STN electrodes and one for the 2 VC/VS electrodes. | Procedure or surgery | STN Arm, VC/VS Arm |
Primary outcome
Improvement of OCD symptoms on YBOCS scale greater than or equal to 35%
Time frame: 15 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Mar 2017.
- Background: PubMed 16393016Storch EA, Murphy TK, Geffken GR, Sajid M, Allen P, Roberti JW, Goodman WK. Reliability and validity of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale. Psychol Assess. 2005 Dec;17(4):486-91. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.486.
- Background: PubMed 20528050Storch EA, Rasmussen SA, Price LH, Larson MJ, Murphy TK, Goodman WK. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale--Second Edition. Psychol Assess. 2010 Jun;22(2):223-32. doi: 10.1037/a0018492.
- Background: PubMed 18625864Welter ML, Mallet L, Houeto JL, Karachi C, Czernecki V, Cornu P, Navarro S, Pidoux B, Dormont D, Bardinet E, Yelnik J, Damier P, Agid Y. Internal pallidal and thalamic stimulation in patients with Tourette syndrome. Arch Neurol. 2008 Jul;65(7):952-7. doi: 10.1001/archneur.65.7.952.
- Background: PubMed 17251240Stefani A, Lozano AM, Peppe A, Stanzione P, Galati S, Tropepi D, Pierantozzi M, Brusa L, Scarnati E, Mazzone P. Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the pedunculopontine and subthalamic nuclei in severe Parkinson's disease. Brain. 2007 Jun;130(Pt 6):1596-607. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl346. Epub 2007 Jan 24.
- Background: PubMed 19773356Ferraye MU, Debu B, Fraix V, Goetz L, Ardouin C, Yelnik J, Henry-Lagrange C, Seigneuret E, Piallat B, Krack P, Le Bas JF, Benabid AL, Chabardes S, Pollak P. Effects of pedunculopontine nucleus area stimulation on gait disorders in Parkinson's disease. Brain. 2010 Jan;133(Pt 1):205-14. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp229. Epub 2009 Sep 22.
- Background: PubMed 17853483Cif L, Biolsi B, Gavarini S, Saux A, Robles SG, Tancu C, Vasques X, Coubes P. Antero-ventral internal pallidum stimulation improves behavioral disorders in Lesch-Nyhan disease. Mov Disord. 2007 Oct 31;22(14):2126-9. doi: 10.1002/mds.21723.
- Background: PubMed 21335569Krack P. Subthalamic stimulation for Parkinson's disease: a new benchmark. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;82(4):356-7. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2010.222497. Epub 2011 Feb 18. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 20661550Morein-Zamir S, Craig KJ, Ersche KD, Abbott S, Muller U, Fineberg NA, Bullmore ET, Sahakian BJ, Robbins TW. Impaired visuospatial associative memory and attention in obsessive compulsive disorder but no evidence for differential dopaminergic modulation. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2010 Oct;212(3):357-67. doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-1963-z. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
- Background: PubMed 17412678Robbins TW. Shifting and stopping: fronto-striatal substrates, neurochemical modulation and clinical implications. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 May 29;362(1481):917-32. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2097.
Related trials for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Recruiting
Focused Ultrasound for Behavioral Health
Depression, Anxiety
Not yet recruiting
Linear Accelerator Radiosurgical Anterior Capsulotomy With Task-based fMRI Identification of PERSonalized and PrEdictiVE Biomarkers of REsponse in Treatment-Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (PERSEVERE Trial)
Treatment-refractory Obsessive-compulsive Disorder (trOCD)
Recruiting
tDCS Associated With Symptom Provocation in the Management of Patients With Resistant Obsessive Compulsive Disorder
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Recruiting
Mindfulness Intervention for Psychological and Family Dynamics in Children With Body-Focused Repetitive Behaviors
Mindfulness Skills, Psychosocial Education
RecruitingPhase 2
SONATA Dose Duration LIFU for OCD
Obsessive - Compulsive Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Eileen M Joyce, PhD principal investigator
University College, London
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Deep Brain Stimulation in people with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, run by University College, London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Improvement of OCD symptoms on YBOCS scale greater than or equal to 35% (time frame: 15 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02655926, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Mar 2017.