Gingival RecessionNCT02656732
Amnion Chorion Membrane in Comparison to Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft in Gingival Recession Coverage
A study testing amnion chorion allograft membrane and coronally advanced flap with the subepithelial connective tissue graft in people with Gingival Recession, run by Cairo University.
Trial summary
The present randomized, controlled, parallel-grouped trial included twenty patients (aged 20 to 54 years) suffering from Miller's class I or II gingival recession. Patients were randomly assigned into two equal groups; control group; the coronally advanced flap with the subepithelial connective tissue graft (CAF+SCTG)… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 54 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Gingival Recession
- What is being tested?
- amnion chorion allograft membrane and coronally advanced flap with the subepithelial connective tissue graft
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jun 2014to Oct 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 54 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects aged between 18 - 60 years old.
- Subjects with facial gingival recession defects in anterior and premolar teeth classified as either class I or II defects according to Miller's classification.
- Subjects able to tolerate surgical periodontal procedures.
- Accepts the 6 months follow-up period.
Who cannot join
- Current and former smokers.
- Pregnant females.
- Subjects received any periodontal therapy for a minimum of 6 months prior to the study.
- Subjects taking drugs known to interfere with wound healing.
- Subjects with unacceptable oral hygiene with plaque index >2.
- Teeth with non-carious cervical lesions, cervical caries and malalignment.
About this study
Official title: Clinical Evaluation of Amnion Chorion Membrane in Comparison to Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft in Gingival Recession Coverage: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
The present randomized, controlled, parallel-grouped trial included twenty patients (aged 20 to 54 years) suffering from Miller's class I or II gingival recession. Patients were randomly assigned into two equal groups; control group; the coronally advanced flap with the subepithelial connective tissue graft (CAF+SCTG) or the test group; coronally advanced flap with amnion chorion allograft membrane (CAF+AC).
Read the detailed description
The participants were randomly assigned to receive coronally advanced flap (CAF) with amnion chorion membrane or CAF with subepithelial connective tissue graft using a simple randomization procedure with a 1:1 allocation ratio. A computer generated randomization list was drawn up by a faculty member who was not involved in the recruitment. Allocation concealment was achieved by sealed coded opaque envelopes that contained the treatment to be performed to the enrolled subjects based on the randomized numbers. Consequently, patients were allocated to either AC membrane (intervention) or SCTG (control) groups. The sealed envelope containing treatment assignment was opened at time of the surgery and the number was picked by another person other than the operator.
- Conditions
- Gingival Recession
- Being tested
- amnion chorion allograft membrane, coronally advanced flap with the subepithelial connective tissue graft
- Medical subject headings
- Gingival Recession
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
amnion chorion allograft membraneBiological
Also called BioXclude™,Snoasis Medical products, USA.
Biologic Amnion chorion allograft membrane derived from placenta of a donor pregnant subject.
coronally advanced flap with the subepithelial connective tissue graftProcedure or surgery
Also called autogenous connective tissue graft
coronally advanced flap with the placement of subepithelial connective tissue graft harvested from the palate
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| coronally advanced flap with amnion chorion membrane | Experimental | coronally advanced flap was reflected and amnion chorion allograft membrane was placed under the flap as a guided tissue regeneration barrier. Receives: Biological: amnion chorion allograft membrane |
| subepithelial connective tissue graft | Active comparator | coronally advanced flap was reflected and subepithelial connective tissue graft was harvested from the palate and placed under the flap. Receives: Procedure: coronally advanced flap with the subepithelial connective tissue graft |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
recession depth
It is measured as the distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the gingival margin representing the amount of root coverage.
Measured: Change in mm from baseline before surgical procedure to follow up at 6 months.
Secondary outcomes (7)
Recession Width
It is measured as the distance from mesial and distal papillae along cemento-enamel junction.
Measured: Change in mm from baseline before surgical procedure to follow up at 6 months.
Width of keratinized gingiva
It is measured from the mucogingival junction to the free gingival margin.
Measured: Change in mm from baseline before surgical procedure to follow up at 6 months.
Probing pocket depth
It is measuring the distance from the base of pocket to the gingival margin.
Measured: Change in mm from baseline before surgical procedure to follow up at 6 months.
Clinical attachment level
It is measuring the distance from the apical end of periodontal probe to cemento-enamel junction.
Measured: Change in mm from baseline before surgical procedure to follow up at 6 months.
Tissue Biotype
It is measured by penetrating the gingiva with the periodontal probe down to bone after giving local anesthesia to measure the thickness of gingival tissues
Measured: Change in mm from baseline before surgical procedure to follow up at 6 months.
root coverage esthetic score
The clinical esthetic evaluation was performed without magnification to evaluate gingival margin, marginal tissue contour, soft tissue texture, mucogingival junction alignment and gingival color
Measured: score taken after completion of the study at 6 months
Patient reported outcomes
Patients were given certain questions regarding not regretting to perform the surgery, root hypersensitivity and aesthetic satisfaction to be answered at the 6 month follow-up for assessing their satisfaction with the whole procedure.
Measured: taken after completion of the study at 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2014
- Primary completionApr 2015
- Study completionOct 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Gingival RecessionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cairo UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Noha Ayman Ghallab, Cairo University
- Investigators
- Mona Shoeib, MD, Study chair, Professor of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University.Hani El-Nahas, MD, Study director, Associate Professor of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University.Manar El-Zanaty, Msc., Principal investigator, manarzanaty@hotmail.com
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02656732
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AC_SCTG
- Status last verified
- Apr 2017
- First submitted
- 13 Jan 2016
- Last updated
- 24 Apr 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Cairo F, Cortellini P, Tonetti M, Nieri M, Mervelt J, Cincinelli S, Pini-Prato G. Coronally advanced flap with and without connective tissue graft for the treatment of single maxillary gingival recession with loss of inter-dental attachment. A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2012 Aug;39(8):760-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01903.x. Epub 2012 May 28.
PubMed 22639845Cairo F, Nieri M, Pagliaro U. Efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures in the treatment of localized facial gingival recessions. A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Apr;41 Suppl 15:S44-62. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12182.
PubMed 24641000Chambrone L, Tatakis DN. Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: a systematic review from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. J Periodontol. 2015 Feb;86(2 Suppl):S8-51. doi: 10.1902/jop.2015.130674.
PubMed 25644302Chakraborthy S, Sambashivaiah S, Kulal R, Bilchodmath S. Amnion and Chorion Allografts in Combination with Coronally Advanced Flap in the Treatment of Gingival Recession: A Clinical Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Sep;9(9):ZC98-ZC101. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12971.6572. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
PubMed 26501023de Sanctis M, Zucchelli G. Coronally advanced flap: a modified surgical approach for isolated recession-type defects: three-year results. J Clin Periodontol. 2007 Mar;34(3):262-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.01039.x.
PubMed 17309597Ghahroudi AA, Khorsand A, Rokn AR, Sabounchi SS, Shayesteh YS, Soolari A. Comparison of amnion allograft with connective tissue graft for root coverage procedures: a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Int Acad Periodontol. 2013 Oct;15(4):101-12.
PubMed 24364174
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Apr 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Evaluation of Amnion Chorion Membrane in Comparison to Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft in Gingival Recession Coverage: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02656732
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AC_SCTG
- Conditions
- Gingival Recession
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2014
- Primary completion
- Apr 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The present randomized, controlled, parallel-grouped trial included twenty patients (aged 20 to 54 years) suffering from Miller's class I or II gingival recession. Patients were randomly assigned into two equal groups; control group; the coronally advanced flap with the subepithelial connective tissue graft (CAF+SCTG) or the test group; coronally advanced flap with amnion chorion allograft membrane (CAF+AC).
Detailed description
The participants were randomly assigned to receive coronally advanced flap (CAF) with amnion chorion membrane or CAF with subepithelial connective tissue graft using a simple randomization procedure with a 1:1 allocation ratio. A computer generated randomization list was drawn up by a faculty member who was not involved in the recruitment. Allocation concealment was achieved by sealed coded opaque envelopes that contained the treatment to be performed to the enrolled subjects based on the randomized numbers. Consequently, patients were allocated to either AC membrane (intervention) or SCTG (control) groups. The sealed envelope containing treatment assignment was opened at time of the surgery and the number was picked by another person other than the operator.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| coronally advanced flap with amnion chorion membrane | Experimental | Biological: amnion chorion allograft membranecoronally advanced flap was reflected and amnion chorion allograft membrane was placed under the flap as a guided tissue regeneration barrier. |
| subepithelial connective tissue graft | Active comparator | Procedure: coronally advanced flap with the subepithelial connective tissue graftcoronally advanced flap was reflected and subepithelial connective tissue graft was harvested from the palate and placed under the flap. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 54 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Subjects aged between 18 - 60 years old.
- Subjects with facial gingival recession defects in anterior and premolar teeth classified as either class I or II defects according to Miller's classification.
- Subjects able to tolerate surgical periodontal procedures.
- Accepts the 6 months follow-up period.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Current and former smokers.
- Pregnant females.
- Subjects received any periodontal therapy for a minimum of 6 months prior to the study.
- Subjects taking drugs known to interfere with wound healing.
- Subjects with unacceptable oral hygiene with plaque index >2.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| amnion chorion allograft membraneAlso: BioXclude™,Snoasis Medical products, USA.Biologic Amnion chorion allograft membrane derived from placenta of a donor pregnant subject. | Biological | coronally advanced flap with amnion chorion membrane |
| coronally advanced flap with the subepithelial connective tissue graftAlso: autogenous connective tissue graftcoronally advanced flap with the placement of subepithelial connective tissue graft harvested from the palate | Procedure or surgery | subepithelial connective tissue graft |
Primary outcome
recession depth
Time frame: Change in mm from baseline before surgical procedure to follow up at 6 months.
It is measured as the distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the gingival margin representing the amount of root coverage.
7 secondary outcomes
Recession Width
Time frame: Change in mm from baseline before surgical procedure to follow up at 6 months.
Width of keratinized gingiva
Time frame: Change in mm from baseline before surgical procedure to follow up at 6 months.
Probing pocket depth
Time frame: Change in mm from baseline before surgical procedure to follow up at 6 months.
Clinical attachment level
Time frame: Change in mm from baseline before surgical procedure to follow up at 6 months.
Tissue Biotype
Time frame: Change in mm from baseline before surgical procedure to follow up at 6 months.
root coverage esthetic score
Time frame: score taken after completion of the study at 6 months
Patient reported outcomes
Time frame: taken after completion of the study at 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Apr 2017.
- Results publication: PubMed 22639845Cairo F, Cortellini P, Tonetti M, Nieri M, Mervelt J, Cincinelli S, Pini-Prato G. Coronally advanced flap with and without connective tissue graft for the treatment of single maxillary gingival recession with loss of inter-dental attachment. A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2012 Aug;39(8):760-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01903.x. Epub 2012 May 28.
- Results publication: PubMed 24641000Cairo F, Nieri M, Pagliaro U. Efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures in the treatment of localized facial gingival recessions. A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Apr;41 Suppl 15:S44-62. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12182.
- Results publication: PubMed 25644302Chambrone L, Tatakis DN. Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: a systematic review from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. J Periodontol. 2015 Feb;86(2 Suppl):S8-51. doi: 10.1902/jop.2015.130674.
- Results publication: PubMed 26501023Chakraborthy S, Sambashivaiah S, Kulal R, Bilchodmath S. Amnion and Chorion Allografts in Combination with Coronally Advanced Flap in the Treatment of Gingival Recession: A Clinical Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Sep;9(9):ZC98-ZC101. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12971.6572. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
- Results publication: PubMed 17309597de Sanctis M, Zucchelli G. Coronally advanced flap: a modified surgical approach for isolated recession-type defects: three-year results. J Clin Periodontol. 2007 Mar;34(3):262-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.01039.x.
- Results publication: PubMed 24364174Ghahroudi AA, Khorsand A, Rokn AR, Sabounchi SS, Shayesteh YS, Soolari A. Comparison of amnion allograft with connective tissue graft for root coverage procedures: a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Int Acad Periodontol. 2013 Oct;15(4):101-12.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Gingival Recession
Not yet recruiting
Free Soft Tissue Grafts (FSTG) Using Autograft Palatal Donor Tissue vs. Xenograft Collagen Matrix (Zderm™)
Gingival Recession Localized Moderate, Dental Implant
Recruiting
i-PRF-Based Bioactive Matrix vs. Connective Tissue Graft in the Treatment of Gingival Recessions
Gingival Graft, Recession, Gingival
Recruiting
Palatal Wound Healing After Free Gingival Graft Harvest in Diabetic Patients: A Clinical Trial
Diabetes Mellitus, Gingival Recession, Generalized
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of the Effect of Smoking on Palatal Donor Site Tissue Profile in the Success of Connective Tissue Grafts
Soft Tissue Augmentation, Gingival Recession Localized Moderate
Active, not recruiting
Vertically Coronally Advanced Flap Versus Coronally Advanced Flap for Miller Class I Gingival Recession
Gingival Recession
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mona Shoeib, MD study chair
Professor of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University.
Hani El-Nahas, MD study director
Associate Professor of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University.
Manar El-Zanaty, Msc. principal investigator
manarzanaty@hotmail.com
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing amnion chorion allograft membrane and coronally advanced flap with the subepithelial connective tissue graft in people with Gingival Recession, run by Cairo University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Apr 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
recession depth (time frame: Change in mm from baseline before surgical procedure to follow up at 6 months.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02656732, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Apr 2017.