Defect of Articular CartilageFastTRACKNCT02659215
HyaloFAST Trial for Repair of Articular Cartilage in the Knee
A study testing Hyalofast and Microfracture in people with Defect of Articular Cartilage, run by Anika Therapeutics, Inc. at 48 sites in 9 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Hyalofast® scaffold with bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) compared to microfracture in the treatment of symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Defect of Articular Cartilage
- What is being tested?
- Hyalofast and Microfracture
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 48 sitesin 9 countries
- Study dates
- Dec 2015to 30 Jun 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient is male or female, between 18 and 60 years of age
- Patient's body mass index (BMI) is <35 kg/m2
- Patient has a symptomatic lesion of the femoral condyle (medial and/or lateral) or femoral trochlea that is between 1.5 - 6 cm2 on screening images confirmed by the independent radiologist
- The symptomatic lesion is classified as International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade 3 or 4
- Patient agrees to actively participate in a strict rehabilitation protocol and follow-up program
- Patient is using only nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or acetaminophen/paracetamol during the month before signing the informed consent form to treat knee pain
Show all 13Show fewer
- Patient is willing and able to provide informed consent and comply with study requirements
- Patient, if woman of childbearing potential, must have a negative pregnancy test at Screening, cannot be lactating and is willing to use adequate contraception for the first 12 months of the study after the last surgery
- Patient has ability to consistently rate knee pain and function as demonstrated by completion of total KOOS score
- Patient has a minimum of 45 out of 100 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score for index knee pain when remembering index knee pain when not on medication and when active
- Patient is willing to use other pain medication rather than Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDS) for 6 months post-surgery (e.g. acetaminophen, or narcotic analgesics, if prescribed). Post-surgical use of aspirin for clot prevention is acceptable.
- Patient is willing to restrict pain medication after 6 months post-surgery to NSAIDs or acetaminophen/paracetamol only through the end of the trial
- Patient must have Hematocrit ≥ 28.0%; White Blood Cell count ≤ 14,000; Platelet Count ≥ 50,000; Creatinine ≤ 2.0 mg/dL; and International Normalized Ratio (INR) ≤ 1.6
Who cannot join
- Major concomitant cartilage lesions which require extensive surgical treatment. (Lesions such as minor loose bodies, small debris fragments, small cartilage fragments or prominent knee fat pad are allowed. These lesions may be treated with debridement).
- Presence of a kissing bipolar lesion that is apposed to the index lesion and is deeper than Grade 2 (ICRS classification) as determined by MRI. (Presence of a kissing (bipolar) lesion that is apposed to the index lesion and is deeper than Grade 2 and is discovered under arthroscopy are allowed). The non-index lesion, if indicated for treatment, should be treated with the study assigned treatment of the index lesion.
- Diagnosed advanced osteoarthritis as demonstrated by a Kellgren-Lawrence grade of 3 or 4 in the index knee
- Complex ligamentous instability of the index or contralateral knee. (Previous reconstructions of Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) or Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) are allowed, of either the index or contralateral knee, if instability is not present. Grade 1 ligamentous injury are allowed)
- Infections or skin diseases at target knee joint
- Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD)
Show all 30Show fewer
- Patients requiring meniscal arrow or meniscal sutures
- Previous meniscal transplant in the index knee
- Patients with previous total or functional meniscectomy. (Patients with a previous partial meniscectomy and a meniscus that is considered biomechanically functional are allowed)
- Varus or valgus malalignment exceeding 10° in either knee
- Patient requiring concomitant surgical procedures at the time of Index Procedure such as osteotomies (e.g. high tibial valgus and/or patellar realignment osteotomy), bone subchondral perforation, ligament surgery, meniscal surgeries etc.
- Previous cartilage repair procedure (microfracture, Osteochondral autograft transplantation system (OATS) or Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (ACI) with or without use of a scaffold (matrix) in the index knee
- Previous failed microfracture procedure in index knee. (Previous history of microfracture in the contralateral knee is allowed)
- Known hypersensitivity (allergy) to hyaluronate
- Contraindication(s) to microfracture surgery
- Hyaluronic acid intra-articular injections into the index knee within the last 90 days before signing informed consent
- Corticosteroid therapy by systemic or intra-articular route within the last 60 days before informed consent or intramuscular or oral corticosteroids within the last 30 days before informed consent.
- Uncontrolled diabetes
- Any concomitant painful or disabling disease of the spine, hips, or lower limbs, including the contralateral knee, that would interfere with evaluation of the index knee
- Any clinically significant or symptomatic vascular or neurologic disorder of the lower extremities
- Any evidence of the following diseases in the index knee: septic arthritis; inflammatory joint disease; gout; recurrent episodes of pseudogout; Paget disease of bone; ochronosis; acromegaly; hemochromatosis; Wilson disease; primary osteochondromatosis; heritable disorders; collagen gene mutations
- Rheumatoid arthritis or gouty arthritis
- Current diagnosis of osteomyelitis
- Any result from screening blood work (including complete blood count, Prothrombin Time (PT)/Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT)/INR, liver function, and creatinine) that exceeds 1.5x the upper limit of normal or is below 0.5x the lower limit of normal.
- Diagnosed musculoskeletal cancer or any diagnosed cancer, other than musculoskeletal if not on long term remission (e.g. at least 5 years or negative biopsy at last exam), except basal cell carcinoma
- Alcohol and drug (including medication) abuse
- Patients who are at higher risk for post-surgical bleeding (e.g., bleeding disorder; taking anticoagulants except low dose aspirin) or post-surgical infection (e.g., taking immunosuppressants; have a severe infection or a history of serious infection)
- Contraindications to MR imaging
- Patient is currently receiving workman's compensation or disability or is in litigation for workman's compensation or disability claims
- Participation in concurrent trials or in previous trial within 90 days of signing informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
48 sites in 9 countries.
48 sites in 9 countries
United States18 sites
Austin Ortho Biologics / Seton Medical Center Austin
Austin, Texas, 78705
Bone and Joint Clinic of Baton Rouge
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70808
Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43221
Covington Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Institute
Covington, Louisiana, 70433
Clinical Research Center of Nevada
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89121
Axis Clinical Trials
Los Angeles, California, 90036
Kerlan-Jobe Orthopedic Clinic
Los Angeles, California, 90045
Paramount Trials, LLC
Miami, Florida, 33016
Epic Medical Research
Murray, Utah, 84123
Suncoast Clinical Research
New Port Richey, Florida, 34652
New York Presbyterian Hospital
New York, New York, 11355
Penn Medicine
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
OrthoIllinois
Rockford, Illinois, 61107
BioSolutions Clinical Research Center
San Diego, California, 91942
Orthopedic Foundation
Stamford, Connecticut, 06905
New Hope Research Development
Tarzana, California, 91356
Physicians Research Group
Tempe, Arizona, 85284
Baylor Scott & White
Temple, Texas, 76508
Hungary9 sites
Health Center of Downtown-Lipotvaros, Orthopedic Outpatient Clinic (Belvárosi-Lipótvárosi Egészségügyi Szolgálat Ortopeadia)
Budapest, 1051
Semmelweis Egyetem Orthopaedic Clinic (Ortopédiai Klinika)
Budapest, 1113
Uzsoki Hospital, Department of Traumatology
Budapest, 1145
Jutrix Medical Llc
Budapest, 6000
Menta Egeszsegkozpont Kft.
Budapest, H-1115
Magyar Honvedseg, Egeszseugyi Kozpont, Balesteti Sebeszeti Osztaly
Budapest
DE KK Ortopediai Klinika
Debrecen
Somogy Megyei Kaposi Mór Oktatókórház
Kaposvár
Kastelypark Klinka
Tata
Austria8 sites
Medical University of Graz
Graz
Universtitatsklinkik Krems
Krems, 3500
Kepler University Clinic
Linz, Upper Austria, 4021
Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Schwestern
Ried, Upper Austria, 4910
University Hospital Tulln
Tulln, Lower Austria, 3430
Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, 1090
Evangelisches Krankenhaus
Vienna, 1180
Private Hospital Doebling
Vienna, 1190
Italy3 sites
Instituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Bologna
A.O. Universitaria San Martino Monoblocco
Genova, 16132
University Federico II
Naples, 80131
Mexico3 sites
Desarrollo Ético en Investigación Clínica S.C.
Guadalajara, CP 44500
Cruz Roja Mexicana (Hospital de Ortopedia de la Cruz Roja Mexicana)
Mérida, CP 97166
Hospital Universitario Dr. José Eleuterio González
Monterrey
Estonia2 sites
Ortopeedia Arstid AS
Tallinn, 10138
North Estonia Medical Center
Tallinn, 13419
Lithuania2 sites
AB "Ortopedijos technika"
Kaunas, LT-49476
Vilnius University Hospital Santaros klinikos
Vilnius, LT-08661
Philippines1 site
De La Salle Medical and Health Sciences Institute
Cavite
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Randomized, Active Treatment-controlled, Evaluator-blinded Multicenter Study to Establish the Superiority of Hyalofast® With BMAC in the Treatment of Articular Knee Cartilage Defect Lesions in Comparison to Control
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Hyalofast® scaffold with bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) compared to microfracture in the treatment of symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee.
Read the detailed description
- Prospective, randomized, active treatment-controlled, evaluator-blinded (radiologist reviewer and physician evaluator) multicenter study (up to 40 sites in the US and EU).
- All subjects that meet preoperative screening eligibility criteria will be randomized to treatment with Hyalofast® with BMAC or Microfracture.
- Hyalofast® is a sterile, biodegradable non-woven pad (2 x 2 cm or 5 x 5 cm) that is composed of HYAFF-11®, a benzyl ester of hyaluronic acid. Hyalofast® acts as a biodegradable support for the autologous bone marrow aspirate concentrate. Hyalofast® is soft and conformable and can easily be cut to fit the lesion size.
- Autologous bone marrow is harvested from the subject intraoperatively during the Index Procedure. Approximately 60 mL of bone marrow will be aspirated from the subject's iliac crest using the SmartPrep 2 Bone Marrow Processing Pack. The cellular rich portion will be concentrated via the SmartPrep BMAC 2 Centrifuge System at point-of-care to provide 7 mL of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC). 1 - 2 mLs will be used for post-procedure testing of total nucleated cells, cell viability, and sterility.
- Hyalofast® with BMAC is implanted during either a standard knee arthroscopy or min-arthrotomy depending upon surgeon preferences and intra-operative findings. The lesion to be treated will be debrided to a stable cartilage margin. The defect will be sized and Hyalofast® will be cut to fit the lesion area. If necessary, more than one Hyalofast® pad can be overlapped to cover the lesion. 2 mL of BMAC will be loaded per Hyalofast® scaffold and then implanted to cover the defect. Hyalofast® with BMAC readily adheres to the site of application, but, if necessary, can be secured to the defect margins with an FDA-approved fibrin glue.
- All subjects will be assessed at intervals post-procedure (1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months).
- Subjects will be required to follow a strict pre-specified post-surgery rehabilitation protocol specific to the defect location.
- Measures to assess effectiveness will be conducted at follow-ups, with the primary effectiveness endpoint assessment done at the 24 month timepoint.
- Evaluators doing efficacy assessments of the subject and administering subject-reported outcome instruments will be blinded to the treatment.
- Safety will be assessed by the collection of adverse events at all timepoints.
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) will be conducted at Screening, 1 month, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months. Evaluation of the MRIs, including the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score, will be done by blinded radiologist reviewers. The one month MRI will be used as the baseline MRI for evaluation of treatment effectiveness.
- Conditions
- Defect of Articular Cartilage
- Being tested
- Hyalofast, Microfracture
- Keywords
- Hyaluronic Acid, Cartilage Repair, Knee
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HyalofastDevice
Implantation of Hyalofast scaffold with autologous bone marrow aspirate concentrate via arthroscopy/mini-arthrotomy.
MicrofractureProcedure or surgery
Microfracture is a well-established arthroscopic surgical technique for cartilage repair which involves several systematic steps, including debridement to a stable cartilage margin, careful removal of the calcified cartilage layer, and homogeneous placement of microfracture penetrations within the cartilage defect, with resultant complete defect fill by a well-anchored clot
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Hyalofast with BMAC | Experimental | A hyaluronan-based scaffold (Hyalofast®) is utilized together with autologous bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) in a one-step arthroscopic/mini-arthrotomic procedure. Receives: Device: Hyalofast |
| Microfracture | Active comparator | Microfracture is an arthroscopic surgical technique involving placement of microfracture penetrations within the cartilage defect to provide stem cells and growth factors from the bone marrow to aid cartilage repair. Receives: Procedure: Microfracture |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Superiority of Hyalofast with Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) vs. Microfracture for % Change in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Score
Co-primary endpoint
Measured: 2 years post-surgery
Superiority of Hyalofast with Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) vs. Microfracture for % Change in International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Score
Co-Primary Endpoint
Measured: 2 years post-surgery
Secondary outcomes (5)
Superiority of Hyalofast® with autologous BMAC vs. Microfracture for change in MRI MOCART Score from baseline to two years post-surgery
Measured: 2 years post-surgery
Superiority of Hyalofast® with autologous BMAC vs. Microfracture for change in Evaluator Global Assessment from baseline to two years post-surgery
Measured: 2 years post-surgery
Superiority of Hyalofast® with autologous BMAC vs. Microfracture in change in individual KOOS subscales from baseline to two years post-surgery
Measured: 2 years post-surgery
Superiority of Hyalofast® with autologous BMAC vs. Microfracture in change in IKDC Knee Examination Form domains from baseline to two years post-surgery
Measured: 2 years post-surgery
The incidence, timing, severity, and relationship to treatment of all Adverse Events (AE), will be collected for all participants.
Measured: 3 years post-surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2015
- Primary completion20 Mar 2025
- Study completion30 Jun 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Defect of Articular CartilageStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Anika Therapeutics, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Alberto Gobbi, MD, Principal investigator, OASI Bioresearch Foundation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02659215
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Hyalofast 15-01
- Acronym
- FastTRACK
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 14 Jan 2016
- Last updated
- 15 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Shah SS, Lee S, Mithoefer K. Next-Generation Marrow Stimulation Technology for Cartilage Repair: Basic Science to Clinical Application. JBJS Rev. 2021 Jan 19;9(1):e20.00090. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.20.00090.
PubMed 33512974
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Randomized, Active Treatment-controlled, Evaluator-blinded Multicenter Study to Establish the Superiority of Hyalofast® With BMAC in the Treatment of Articular Knee Cartilage Defect Lesions in Comparison to Control
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02659215
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FastTRACK / Hyalofast 15-01
- Conditions
- Defect of Articular Cartilage
- Keywords
- Hyaluronic Acid, Cartilage Repair, Knee
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Anika Therapeutics, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Hyalofast® scaffold with bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) compared to microfracture in the treatment of symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee.
Detailed description
- Prospective, randomized, active treatment-controlled, evaluator-blinded (radiologist reviewer and physician evaluator) multicenter study (up to 40 sites in the US and EU).
- All subjects that meet preoperative screening eligibility criteria will be randomized to treatment with Hyalofast® with BMAC or Microfracture.
- Hyalofast® is a sterile, biodegradable non-woven pad (2 x 2 cm or 5 x 5 cm) that is composed of HYAFF-11®, a benzyl ester of hyaluronic acid. Hyalofast® acts as a biodegradable support for the autologous bone marrow aspirate concentrate. Hyalofast® is soft and conformable and can easily be cut to fit the lesion size.
- Autologous bone marrow is harvested from the subject intraoperatively during the Index Procedure. Approximately 60 mL of bone marrow will be aspirated from the subject's iliac crest using the SmartPrep 2 Bone Marrow Processing Pack. The cellular rich portion will be concentrated via the SmartPrep BMAC 2 Centrifuge System at point-of-care to provide 7 mL of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC). 1 - 2 mLs will be used for post-procedure testing of total nucleated cells, cell viability, and sterility.
- Hyalofast® with BMAC is implanted during either a standard knee arthroscopy or min-arthrotomy depending upon surgeon preferences and intra-operative findings. The lesion to be treated will be debrided to a stable cartilage margin. The defect will be sized and Hyalofast® will be cut to fit the lesion area. If necessary, more than one Hyalofast® pad can be overlapped to cover the lesion. 2 mL of BMAC will be loaded per Hyalofast® scaffold and then implanted to cover the defect. Hyalofast® with BMAC readily adheres to the site of application, but, if necessary, can be secured to the defect margins with an FDA-approved fibrin glue.
- All subjects will be assessed at intervals post-procedure (1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months).
- Subjects will be required to follow a strict pre-specified post-surgery rehabilitation protocol specific to the defect location.
- Measures to assess effectiveness will be conducted at follow-ups, with the primary effectiveness endpoint assessment done at the 24 month timepoint.
- Evaluators doing efficacy assessments of the subject and administering subject-reported outcome instruments will be blinded to the treatment.
- Safety will be assessed by the collection of adverse events at all timepoints.
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) will be conducted at Screening, 1 month, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months. Evaluation of the MRIs, including the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score, will be done by blinded radiologist reviewers. The one month MRI will be used as the baseline MRI for evaluation of treatment effectiveness.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Hyalofast with BMAC | Experimental | Device: HyalofastA hyaluronan-based scaffold (Hyalofast®) is utilized together with autologous bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) in a one-step arthroscopic/mini-arthrotomic procedure. |
| Microfracture | Active comparator | Procedure: MicrofractureMicrofracture is an arthroscopic surgical technique involving placement of microfracture penetrations within the cartilage defect to provide stem cells and growth factors from the bone marrow to aid cartilage repair. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Patient is male or female, between 18 and 60 years of age
- Patient's body mass index (BMI) is <35 kg/m2
- Patient has a symptomatic lesion of the femoral condyle (medial and/or lateral) or femoral trochlea that is between 1.5 - 6 cm2 on screening images confirmed by the independent radiologist
- The symptomatic lesion is classified as International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade 3 or 4
- Patient agrees to actively participate in a strict rehabilitation protocol and follow-up program
Key exclusion criteria (30 listed)
- Major concomitant cartilage lesions which require extensive surgical treatment. (Lesions such as minor loose bodies, small debris fragments, small cartilage fragments or prominent knee fat pad are allowed. These lesions may be treated with debridement).
- Presence of a kissing bipolar lesion that is apposed to the index lesion and is deeper than Grade 2 (ICRS classification) as determined by MRI. (Presence of a kissing (bipolar) lesion that is apposed to the index lesion and is deeper than Grade 2 and is discovered under arthroscopy are allowed). The non-index lesion, if indicated for treatment, should be treated with the study assigned treatment of the index lesion.
- Diagnosed advanced osteoarthritis as demonstrated by a Kellgren-Lawrence grade of 3 or 4 in the index knee
- Complex ligamentous instability of the index or contralateral knee. (Previous reconstructions of Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) or Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) are allowed, of either the index or contralateral knee, if instability is not present. Grade 1 ligamentous injury are allowed)
- Infections or skin diseases at target knee joint
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HyalofastImplantation of Hyalofast scaffold with autologous bone marrow aspirate concentrate via arthroscopy/mini-arthrotomy. | Device | Hyalofast with BMAC |
| MicrofractureMicrofracture is a well-established arthroscopic surgical technique for cartilage repair which involves several systematic steps, including debridement to a stable cartilage margin, careful removal of the calcified cartilage layer, and homogeneous placement of microfracture penetrations within the cartilage defect, with resultant complete defect fill by a well-anchored clot | Procedure or surgery | Microfracture |
Primary outcome
Superiority of Hyalofast with Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) vs. Microfracture for % Change in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Score
Time frame: 2 years post-surgery
Co-primary endpoint
Superiority of Hyalofast with Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) vs. Microfracture for % Change in International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Score
Time frame: 2 years post-surgery
Co-Primary Endpoint
5 secondary outcomes
Superiority of Hyalofast® with autologous BMAC vs. Microfracture for change in MRI MOCART Score from baseline to two years post-surgery
Time frame: 2 years post-surgery
Superiority of Hyalofast® with autologous BMAC vs. Microfracture for change in Evaluator Global Assessment from baseline to two years post-surgery
Time frame: 2 years post-surgery
Superiority of Hyalofast® with autologous BMAC vs. Microfracture in change in individual KOOS subscales from baseline to two years post-surgery
Time frame: 2 years post-surgery
Superiority of Hyalofast® with autologous BMAC vs. Microfracture in change in IKDC Knee Examination Form domains from baseline to two years post-surgery
Time frame: 2 years post-surgery
The incidence, timing, severity, and relationship to treatment of all Adverse Events (AE), will be collected for all participants.
Time frame: 3 years post-surgery
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Apr 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33512974Shah SS, Lee S, Mithoefer K. Next-Generation Marrow Stimulation Technology for Cartilage Repair: Basic Science to Clinical Application. JBJS Rev. 2021 Jan 19;9(1):e20.00090. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.20.00090.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Defect of Articular Cartilage
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of MACI in Patients Aged 17 to 65 Years With Symptomatic Chondral or Osteochondral Defects of the Ankle
Chondral Defect, Articular Cartilage Defect
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of MACI in Patients Aged 10 to 17 Years With Symptomatic Chondral or Osteochondral Defects of the Knee
Chondral Defect, Osteochondritis Dissecans (OCD)
Not yet recruiting
Biologic Augmentation of Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Knee
Osteochondral Defect, Articular Cartilage Defect
Recruiting
Subchondral Drilling Diameter During CARTISTEM Implantation for Knee Cartilage Defects
Osteoarthritis, Knee, Articular Cartilage Defects of the Knee
RecruitingPhase 1
AMIC Compared With Microfracture for Focal Articular Cartilage Damage of the Hip
Hip Arthroscopy, Articular Cartilage Defect
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alberto Gobbi, MD principal investigator
OASI Bioresearch Foundation
48 sites in 9 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Hyalofast and Microfracture in people with Defect of Articular Cartilage, run by Anika Therapeutics, Inc. at 48 sites in 9 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 30 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 48 sites in United States, Hungary, Austria, Italy, Mexico and 4 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Superiority of Hyalofast with Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) vs. Microfracture for % Change in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Score (time frame: 2 years post-surgery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02659215, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Apr 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.