Urinary IncontinencePhase 3CONTENT2NCT02660359
Dysport® Treatment of Urinary Incontinence in Adults Subjects With Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity (NDO) Due to Spinal Cord Injury or Multiple Sclerosis - Study 2
A Phase 3 study testing Botulinum toxin type A in people with Urinary Incontinence and Overactive Bladder, run by Ipsen at 82 sites in 16 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to provide confirmatory evidence of the safety and efficacy of two Dysport® doses (600 units [U] and 800 U), compared to placebo in reducing urinary incontinence (UI) in adult subjects treated for neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) due to spinal cord injury (SCI) or multiple sclerosis… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Urinary Incontinence, Overactive Bladder
- What is being tested?
- Botulinum toxin type A
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 258 participants
- Where
- 82 sitesin 16 countries
- Study dates
- 8 Jul 2016to 4 Jul 2019
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Urinary Incontinence for at least 3 months prior to Screening as a result of Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity due to Spinal Cord Injury or Multiple Sclerosis.
- Subjects with Spinal Cord Injury must have a stable neurological injury at T1 level or below which occurred at least 6 months prior to Screening.
- Subjects with Multiple Sclerosis must be clinically stable in the investigator's opinion, with no exacerbation (relapse) of MS for at least 3 months prior to Screening.
- Subjects must have had an inadequate response after at least 4 weeks of oral medications used in the treatment of NDO (e.g. anticholinergics, beta-3 agonists) and/or have intolerable side-effects.
- Routinely performing Clean Intermittent Catheterization (CIC) to ensure adequate bladder emptying.
- An average of at least two episodes per day of Urinary Incontinence recorded on the screening bladder diary.
Who cannot join
- Any current condition (other than NDO) that may impact on bladder function.
- Previous or current, tumour or malignancy affecting the spinal column or spinal cord, or any other unstable cause of SCI.
- Any condition that will prevent cystoscopic treatment administration or CIC usage, e.g. urethral strictures.
- Current indwelling bladder catheter, or removal of indwelling bladder catheter less than 4 weeks prior to Screening.
- BTX-A treatment within 9 months prior to Screening for any urological condition (e.g. detrusor or urethral sphincter treatments).
- Any neuromodulation/electrostimulation usage for urinary symptoms/incontinence within 4 weeks prior to Screening. Any implanted neuromodulation device must be switched off at least 4 weeks prior to Screening.
Trial locations and contacts
82 sites in 16 countries.
82 sites in 16 countries
France11 sites
Hôpital Raymond-Poincaré
Garches
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille (CHRU) - Hôpital Claude Huriez
Lille
Hôpital de la Conception
Marseille
Groupe Hospitalo-Universitaire Pierre Caremau
Nîmes
Hopital de la Source
Orléans
Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere
Paris
Hôpital Tenon
Paris
Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud
Pierre-Bénite
CHU de Rennes - Hôpital Pontchaillou
Rennes
CHU de ROUEN - Hôpital Charles Nicolle
Rouen
Hôpital Rangueil
Toulouse
Brazil10 sites
Universidade Estadual de Campinas - Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz
Campinas, 13083-970
Hospital de Clinicas, Federal University of Paraná
Curitiba, 80060-900
Hospital São Vicente de Paulo
Passo Fundo, 99010-080
Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre - Hospital Santa Clara
Porto Alegre, 90020-090
Hospital Moinhos de Vento
Pôrto Alegre, 90560-030
Hospital São Lucas da PUCRS
Pôrto Alegre, 90610-000
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo
Ribeirão Preto, 14048-900
Faculdade de Medicina do ABC
Santo André, 09060-650
Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz
São Paulo, 01323-020
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
São Paulo, 05422-970
Russia8 sites
Scientific research institute of urology and interventional radiology n. a. N. A. Lopatkin
Moscow, 105425
Ministry of healthcare of the Russian Federation
Moscow, 129226
Penza Regional Clinical Hospital n.a. N.N.Burdenko
Penza, 440026
Rostov State Medical University
Rostov-on-Don, 344022
St. Petersburg Research Institute of Phthisiopulmonology
Saint Petersburg, 194064
Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University
Saint Petersburg, 197089
City Hospital No. 40
Saint Petersburg, 197706
Hospital Orkli
Saint Petersburg
Spain7 sites
Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña
A Coruña
Fundacio Puigvert
Barcelona, 08025
Fundació GAEM
Barcelona
Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Madrid
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
Seville
Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe
Valencia
Peru6 sites
Clínica San Pablo Surco
Lima, 15023
Clinica Good Hope
Lima, Lima18
Clinica Internacional Sede Lima
Lima, Lima1
Clínica Anglo Americana
Lima, Lima27
Instituto de Ginecología y Reproducción
Lima, Lima33
Unidad de Investigación de la Clínica Internacional Sede San Borja
Lima, Lima41
United Kingdom6 sites
NHS Grampian - Aberdeen Royal Infirmary
Aberdeen, AB25 2ZN
Bedford Hospital
Bedford, MK42 9DJ
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery - UCL
London, WC1N 3BG
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust - Royal Hallamshire Hospital
Sheffield, S10 2JF
Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital Trust
Stanmore, HA7 4LP
The Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust - Pinderfields Hospital
Wakefield, WF1 4DG
Argentina5 sites
Instituto Urológico Buenos Aires
Buenos Aires, 1060
Centro de Urologia
Buenos Aires, C1120AAS
Centro Urológico Profesor Bengió
Córdoba, X5000
Hospital Privado - Centro Médico de Córdoba
Córdoba, X5016KEH
Instituto Médico Rodriguez Alfici
Godoy Cruz, M5501AAP
Colombia5 sites
Solano & Terront Servicios Medicos LTDA- Unidad Integral de Endocrinologia
Bogotá, 110221
Fundación Valle del Lili
Cali, 760032
Centro Medico Imbanaco
Cali, 760042
Asociacion IPS Medicos Internistas de Caldas
Manizales, 170004
Centro de Investigaciones Clinicas - CIC
Medellín, 5001000
Israel5 sites
Rambam Medical Center
Haifa, 31096
Carmel Medical Center
Haifa, 34362
Meir Medical Center
Kfar Saba, 44281
Rabin Medical Center - Davidoff Center
Petah Tikva, 49100
The Chaim Sheba Medical Center
Ramat Gan, 52621
Mexico4 sites
Centro Medico Puerta de Hierro - Colima
Colima, 28018
Clinstile, S.A. de C.V.
Cuauhtémoc, 06700
Hospital Universitario "Dr. José Eleuterio González"
Monterrey, 64460
Consultorio Privado
Zapopan, 45040
Belgium3 sites
Antwerp University hospital
Antwerp
Hôpital Erasme
Brussels, 1070
Ourthe-Amblève
Esneux, 4130
Chile3 sites
Clínica Uromed
Santiago, 7500787
Hospital del Trabajador
Santiago, 7501241
Clínica Las Condes
Santiago, 7591046
Germany3 sites
Universitätsklinikum Bonn Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie
Bonn, 53127
Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH - Krankenhaus St. Franziskus
Mönchengladbach
Universitätsklinikum Münster
Münster, 48149
Australia2 sites
Prince of Wales Hospital (POWH)
Sydney, 2031
Westmead Hospital
Westmead, 2145
Lithuania2 sites
Estetines Chirurgijos Centas, UAB
Kaunas, 49476
Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Klinikos
Vilnius, 8661
Ukraine2 sites
Municipal Healthcare Institution "Regional Clinical Center of Urology and Nephrology n.a. V.I. Shapoval", Urology Department
Kharkiv, 61037
Kiev City Clinical Hospital No. 3
Kiev, 02125
About this study
Official title: A Phase III, Multicentre, Randomised, Double Blind, Parallel Group, Placebo Controlled Study To Assess The Efficacy And Safety Of One Or More Intradetrusor Treatments Of 600 Or 800 Units Of Dysport® For The Treatment Of Urinary Incontinence In Subjects With Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity Due To Spinal Cord Injury Or Multiple Sclerosis
The purpose of this study is to provide confirmatory evidence of the safety and efficacy of two Dysport® doses (600 units [U] and 800 U), compared to placebo in reducing urinary incontinence (UI) in adult subjects treated for neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) due to spinal cord injury (SCI) or multiple sclerosis (MS).
- Conditions
- Urinary Incontinence, Overactive Bladder
- Being tested
- Botulinum toxin type A, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Bladder, Overactive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Botulinum toxin type ABiological
Also called AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®), Clostridium BTX-A-haemagglutinin complex
600 U intra detrusor injection in two treatment periods (Initial and Retreatment phase) delivered at 30 injection points.
Botulinum toxin type ABiological
Also called AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®), Clostridium BTX-A-haemagglutinin complex
800 U intra detrusor injection in two treatment periods (Initial and Retreatment phase) delivered at 30 injection points
PlaceboDrug
AbobotulinumtoxinA Placebo 600 U intra detrusor injection in two treatment periods (Initial and Retreatment phase) delivered at 30 injection points
PlaceboDrug
AbobotulinumtoxinA Placebo 800 U intra detrusor injection in two treatment periods (Initial and Retreatment phase) delivered at 30 injection points
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 600 U Dysport® Group | Experimental | Not described Receives: Biological: Botulinum toxin type A |
| 600 U Dysport® Placebo Group | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| 800 U Dysport® Group | Experimental | Not described Receives: Biological: Botulinum toxin type A |
| 800 U Dysport® Placebo Group | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Change From Baseline in Weekly Number of UI Episodes at Week 6 of DBPC Cycle
The weekly number of UI episodes was measured using a 7-day bladder diary. Bladder diaries that contained data recorded on at least 5 days were included in the analysis. The least square (LS) mean of the change in weekly number of UI episodes at 6 weeks after the first study treatment was calculated using a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 of DBPC Cycle
Secondary outcomes (8)
Percentage of Subjects With No Episodes of UI at Week 6 of DBPC Cycle
The weekly number of UI episodes was measured using a 7-day bladder diary. Bladder diaries that contained data recorded on at least 5 days were included in the analysis. The number of subjects with no UI episodes at 6 weeks after the first study treatment was recorded. Percentage of subjects with no episodes of UI (≥100% Improvement) was calculated as: Total number of subjects with no weekly number of UI episodes at Week 6 / Total number of subjects with any number of UI events at Week 6.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 of DBPC Cycle
Percentage of Subjects With a UI Response at Improvement Levels ≥30%, ≥50%, and ≥75% at Week 6 of the DBPC Cycle
The weekly number of UI episodes was measured using a 7-day bladder diary. Bladder diaries that contained data recorded on at least 5 days were included in the analysis. The percentage of subjects showing an improvement of ≥30%, ≥50% and ≥75% was calculated as: Total number of subjects with UI response level >=30% or >=50% or >=75% improvement at Week 6 / Total number of subjects with any UI response at Week 6.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 of DBPC Cycle
Median Time Between Treatments
Duration of effect for time between treatments was calculated by: (the date of the first retreatment visit - date of first treatment administration in the DBPC cycle). The median number of days between treatments was determined and subjects with no retreatment were censored at the last visit.
Measured: Day of first treatment (baseline) to day of retreatment, up to 2 years
Mean Change From Baseline in Volume Per Void at Week 6 of DBPC Cycle
The volume per void was measured during one 24-hour period of the 7-day bladder diary. The LS mean of the change in volume per void at 6 weeks after the first study treatment was calculated using a MMRM analysis.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 of DBPC Cycle
Mean Change From Baseline in Maximum Cystometric Capacity (MCC) at Week 6 of DBPC Cycle
Subjects included in the urodynamic subset (84.9% of randomised subjects) had a standardised urodynamic filling cystometry assessment at baseline (Screening) and again at Week 6 to determine the MCC. The LS mean of the change in MCC at 6 weeks after the first study treatment was calculated using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 of DBPC Cycle
Mean Change From Baseline in Maximum Detrusor Pressure (MDP) During Storage at Week 6 of DBPC Cycle
Subjects included in the urodynamic subset (84.9% of randomised subjects) had a standardised urodynamic filling cystometry assessment at baseline (Screening) and again at Week 6 to determine the MDP. The LS mean of the change in MDP at 6 weeks after the first study treatment was calculated using an ANCOVA.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 of DBPC Cycle
Mean Change From Baseline in Volume at First Involuntary Detrusor Contraction (Vol@1stIDC) at Week 6 of DBPC Cycle
Subjects included in the urodynamic subset (84.9% of randomised subjects) had a standardised urodynamic filling cystometry assessment at baseline (Screening) and again at Week 6 to determine the Vol@1stIDC which is the instilled volume when first IDC commences. Subjects who did not exhibit a post-treatment IDC at Week 6 had Vol@1stIDC imputed using the recorded corrected MCC volume at Week 6. The LS mean of the change in Vol@1stIDC at 6 weeks after the first study treatment was calculated using an ANCOVA.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 of DBPC Cycle
Percentage of Subjects With No Involuntary Detrusor Contraction (IDCs) During Storage at Week 6 of DBPC Cycle
Subjects included in the urodynamic subset (84.9% of randomised subjects) had a standardised urodynamic filling cystometry assessment at baseline (Screening) and again at Week 6 to determine the occurrence of IDCs. The percentage of subjects without IDCs at 6 weeks after the first study treatment was recorded.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 of DBPC Cycle
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Study start8 Jul 2016
- Primary completion9 Nov 2018
- Study completion4 Jul 2019
Why it stopped: Slow recruitment of patients
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Urinary IncontinenceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by IpsenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 258 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ipsen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ipsen Medical Director, Study director, Ipsen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02660359
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- D-FR-52120-223
- Other IDs
- 2015-000507-44, 2015
- Acronym
- CONTENT2
- Status last verified
- Sep 2022
- First submitted
- 14 Jan 2016
- Last updated
- 28 Sep 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized, and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of study participants. Any requests should be submitted to www.vivli.org for assessment by an independent scientific review board.
Publications
Kennelly M, Cruz F, Herschorn S, Abrams P, Onem K, Solomonov VK, Del Rosario Figueroa Coz E, Manu-Marin A, Giannantoni A, Thompson C, Vilain C, Volteau M, Denys P; Dysport CONTENT Program Group. Efficacy and Safety of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Patients with Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity Incontinence Performing Regular Clean Intermittent Catheterization: Pooled Results from Two Phase 3 Randomized Studies (CONTENT1 and CONTENT2). Eur Urol. 2022 Aug;82(2):223-232. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.03.010. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
PubMed 35400537
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Sep 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III, Multicentre, Randomised, Double Blind, Parallel Group, Placebo Controlled Study To Assess The Efficacy And Safety Of One Or More Intradetrusor Treatments Of 600 Or 800 Units Of Dysport® For The Treatment Of Urinary Incontinence In Subjects With Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity Due To Spinal Cord Injury Or Multiple Sclerosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02660359
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CONTENT2 / D-FR-52120-223
- Conditions
- Urinary Incontinence, Overactive Bladder
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Slow recruitment of patients
- Enrolment
- 258 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- IpsenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 8 Jul 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 9 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 4 Jul 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 16 Jun 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to provide confirmatory evidence of the safety and efficacy of two Dysport® doses (600 units [U] and 800 U), compared to placebo in reducing urinary incontinence (UI) in adult subjects treated for neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) due to spinal cord injury (SCI) or multiple sclerosis (MS).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 600 U Dysport® Group | Experimental | Biological: Botulinum toxin type A |
| 600 U Dysport® Placebo Group | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo |
| 800 U Dysport® Group | Experimental | Biological: Botulinum toxin type A |
| 800 U Dysport® Placebo Group | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Urinary Incontinence for at least 3 months prior to Screening as a result of Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity due to Spinal Cord Injury or Multiple Sclerosis.
- Subjects with Spinal Cord Injury must have a stable neurological injury at T1 level or below which occurred at least 6 months prior to Screening.
- Subjects with Multiple Sclerosis must be clinically stable in the investigator's opinion, with no exacerbation (relapse) of MS for at least 3 months prior to Screening.
- Subjects must have had an inadequate response after at least 4 weeks of oral medications used in the treatment of NDO (e.g. anticholinergics, beta-3 agonists) and/or have intolerable side-effects.
- Routinely performing Clean Intermittent Catheterization (CIC) to ensure adequate bladder emptying.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Any current condition (other than NDO) that may impact on bladder function.
- Previous or current, tumour or malignancy affecting the spinal column or spinal cord, or any other unstable cause of SCI.
- Any condition that will prevent cystoscopic treatment administration or CIC usage, e.g. urethral strictures.
- Current indwelling bladder catheter, or removal of indwelling bladder catheter less than 4 weeks prior to Screening.
- BTX-A treatment within 9 months prior to Screening for any urological condition (e.g. detrusor or urethral sphincter treatments).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Botulinum toxin type AAlso: AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®), Clostridium BTX-A-haemagglutinin complex600 U intra detrusor injection in two treatment periods (Initial and Retreatment phase) delivered at 30 injection points. | Biological | 600 U Dysport® Group |
| Botulinum toxin type AAlso: AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®), Clostridium BTX-A-haemagglutinin complex800 U intra detrusor injection in two treatment periods (Initial and Retreatment phase) delivered at 30 injection points | Biological | 800 U Dysport® Group |
| PlaceboAbobotulinumtoxinA Placebo 600 U intra detrusor injection in two treatment periods (Initial and Retreatment phase) delivered at 30 injection points | Drug | 600 U Dysport® Placebo Group |
| PlaceboAbobotulinumtoxinA Placebo 800 U intra detrusor injection in two treatment periods (Initial and Retreatment phase) delivered at 30 injection points | Drug | 800 U Dysport® Placebo Group |
Primary outcome
Mean Change From Baseline in Weekly Number of UI Episodes at Week 6 of DBPC Cycle
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 of DBPC Cycle
The weekly number of UI episodes was measured using a 7-day bladder diary. Bladder diaries that contained data recorded on at least 5 days were included in the analysis. The least square (LS) mean of the change in weekly number of UI episodes at 6 weeks after the first study treatment was calculated using a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis.
8 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Subjects With No Episodes of UI at Week 6 of DBPC Cycle
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 of DBPC Cycle
Percentage of Subjects With a UI Response at Improvement Levels ≥30%, ≥50%, and ≥75% at Week 6 of the DBPC Cycle
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 of DBPC Cycle
Median Time Between Treatments
Time frame: Day of first treatment (baseline) to day of retreatment, up to 2 years
Mean Change From Baseline in Volume Per Void at Week 6 of DBPC Cycle
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 of DBPC Cycle
Mean Change From Baseline in Maximum Cystometric Capacity (MCC) at Week 6 of DBPC Cycle
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 of DBPC Cycle
Mean Change From Baseline in Maximum Detrusor Pressure (MDP) During Storage at Week 6 of DBPC Cycle
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 of DBPC Cycle
Mean Change From Baseline in Volume at First Involuntary Detrusor Contraction (Vol@1stIDC) at Week 6 of DBPC Cycle
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 of DBPC Cycle
Percentage of Subjects With No Involuntary Detrusor Contraction (IDCs) During Storage at Week 6 of DBPC Cycle
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 of DBPC Cycle
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Sep 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35400537Kennelly M, Cruz F, Herschorn S, Abrams P, Onem K, Solomonov VK, Del Rosario Figueroa Coz E, Manu-Marin A, Giannantoni A, Thompson C, Vilain C, Volteau M, Denys P; Dysport CONTENT Program Group. Efficacy and Safety of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Patients with Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity Incontinence Performing Regular Clean Intermittent Catheterization: Pooled Results from Two Phase 3 Randomized Studies (CONTENT1 and CONTENT2). Eur Urol. 2022 Aug;82(2):223-232. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.03.010. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized, and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of study participants. Any requests should be submitted to www.vivli.org for assessment by an independent scientific review board.
Related trials for Urinary Incontinence
Recruiting
Safety and Performance of UCon Patch Electrode
Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence, Urge
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Examining the Effects of Intra-detrusor Botox at Time of HoLEP in Men With Overactive Bladder Symptoms
Urinary Incontinence, Overactive Bladder Syndrome
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Recruiting
UCon Treatment of Overactive Bladder (OAB) in Males
Urinary Incontinence, Urge Incontinence
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Overactive Bladder Symptoms and Urinary Incontinence In Women With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ipsen Medical Director study director
Ipsen
82 sites in 16 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Botulinum toxin type A in people with Urinary Incontinence and Overactive Bladder, run by Ipsen at 82 sites in 16 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 82 sites in France, Brazil, Russia, Spain, Peru and 11 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Jun 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Change From Baseline in Weekly Number of UI Episodes at Week 6 of DBPC Cycle (time frame: Baseline and Week 6 of DBPC Cycle). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02660359, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Sep 2022.