Burn Related PainNCT02661724
Take Charge of Burn Pain
A study testing TCBR-Pain in people with Burn Related Pain, run by Johns Hopkins University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Persons with burn-related pain remain under treated and do not have access to comprehensive burn pain management. We seek to extend evidence-based cognitive behavioral pain management strategies to a group of burn survivors that are currently under treated for for burn pain with a specific goal of reducing pain… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Burn Related Pain
- What is being tested?
- TCBR-Pain
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 137 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Apr 2015to 30 Sep 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Persons ages 18 to 70 years old having experienced a burn injury requiring hospitalization at least 6 months prior to enrollment;
- Reporting a pain severity score on the Brief Pain inventory of 4 (0-10) or higher;
- Reporting pain of at least 3 months duration; and
- English speaking due to feasibility of providing the web-based intervention only in English at this time.
Who cannot join
- Significant neurological or psychiatric condition precluding informed consent.
- Lack of access to a computer that is connected to the worldwide web.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Take Charge of Burn Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Web-based Self-Management Intervention to Improve Burn Pain Outcomes
Persons with burn-related pain remain under treated and do not have access to comprehensive burn pain management. We seek to extend evidence-based cognitive behavioral pain management strategies to a group of burn survivors that are currently under treated for for burn pain with a specific goal of reducing pain related interference in life activities.
Investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial to test the central hypothesis that a computer-based cognitive-behavioral program (Take Charge of Burn Pain) will improve pain management, psychological health, and improve participation in burn survivors. Specific aims include: 1) to determine the efficacy of a web-based self-management intervention in reducing pain and pain-related interference and increasing pain management self-efficacy; and 2) to determine whether Take Charge of Burn Pain improves psychological health and participation in life activities in persons with burn injury pain. Emerging research suggests that web-based pain management interventions may be a feasible and effective alternative to clinic-based interventions for patients with mobility and geographic restrictions, such as those treated at tertiary burn centers.
Read the detailed description
Burns are among the most painful of all injuries requiring painful daily wound care and rehabilitation procedures. Despite the best efforts of burn care professionals, burns frequently result in acute and chronic suffering and poor functional outcomes for otherwise healthy individuals with many years of productive life remaining. The evidence base directing burn pain management is generally weak, with much work based on clinical preferences rather than scientific evidence. There is a tremendous need for clinical trials to evaluate and improve the standard of care. While pharmacological treatment options are widely available for burn survivors throughout the emergent, acute, and rehabilitation phases of healing there is limited access to comprehensive pain management. It is critical to establish accessible pain management approaches that address the emotional, cognitive and physical dimensions of the burn pain experience. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has proven effective for patients with chronic pain and studies have demonstrated the efficacy of providing tele-rehabilitation CBT services for improving outcomes in persons with disability. However, tele-rehabilitation CBT pain management has not been traditionally offered or studied in persons with burn-related pain. The population of burn survivors has limited access to comprehensive pain management including CBT due to lack of access, financial constraints, and mobility issues that render clinic-based CBT impractical. Innovative rehabilitation interventions and delivery methods are needed to improve pain, functional, psychological and participation outcomes in burn survivors with significant, yet untreated, pain problems.
Investigators propose to conduct a two group randomized controlled trial to test the central hypothesis that web-based CBT will improve pain severity, pain interference, self-efficacy, psychological health and participation in life activities for burn survivors with pain. Emerging research suggests that tele-rehabilitation may be a feasible, and effective alternative (with much broader applicability) to clinic-based interventions for patients with access restrictions. This project will address 2 specific aims:
Specific Aim 1: To determine the efficacy of a web-based, CBT self-management intervention (Take Charge of Burn Recovery - Pain [TCBR-Pain) in improving pain management self-efficacy, and reducing pain and pain-related interference in burn survivors with pain.
Outcomes will be measured using a battery of standardized tests at baseline, 2 month (treatment completion) and 5 month post-treatment follow-up. Self-reported pain self-efficacy, pain severity and pain interference will be measured using validated instruments (Pain Self-efficacy Scale, Brief Pain Inventory respectively).
Hypothesis 1: TCBR- Pain participants will demonstrate significantly greater improvement in pain self-efficacy, pain severity and pain interference relative to the attention-control group at 2 month (treatment completion) and 5 month follow up.
Specific Aim 2: To determine the efficacy of a web-based, CBT self-management intervention ((Take Charge of Burn Recovery - Pain [TCBR - Pain]) for improving psychological health and participation in life activities for burn survivors with pain.
Outcomes will be measured using a battery of standardized tests at baseline, 2 month (treatment completion) and 5 month follow-up. Self-reported depression and anxiety, and participation in life activities will be measured using validated instruments (PHQ-9 Depression Scale and PCL -Civilian Anxiety Scale, and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scales [WHODAS-II]) respectively.
Hypothesis 2: TCBR- Pain participants will demonstrate significantly greater improvement in depressive and anxiety symptoms and participation relative to the attention-control group at 2 month (treatment completion) and 5 month follow up.
This initial randomized trial will provide critical data on recruitment and retention as well as effect sizes and sample sizes for in the next stage of research - a multi-center, clinical trial which will determine scalability of the intervention. In the proposed study, we will consent 256 burn survivors with pain and randomly assign them to the intervention or control group. After informed oral consent is obtained, potential participants will be screened for eligibility. If eligible, (see inclusion/exclusion criteria below) participants will be consented and will complete the baseline assessment on-line. Once the web-based assessment is complete, the participants will be randomly assigned to either the web-based 7 lesson TCBR - Pain program or the 7 lesson Attention Control -Education group. Randomization will occur in balanced blocks to stratify group composition by pain level, self-reported Total Burn Surface Area, and time since initial burn injury. Participants will complete the post-intervention assessment at 2 months and again at 5 months to assess pain severity, pain interference, psychological health, and participation in life activities. Participants who obtain other treatments while enrolled in the study will be included and these other interventions will be documented and controlled in analyses if necessary. Findings from this study will support future research and dissemination efforts to improve the pain management, psychological health and life participation of patients following burn injury through innovative rehabilitation interventions and delivery methods.
- Conditions
- Burn Related Pain
- Being tested
- TCBR-Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TCBR-PainBehavioural
The interactive TCBR-Pain uses programmed learning, skill development and behavioral practice to engage persons with burn pain in self-management of pain and related problems. The TCB-Pain program includes 7 lessons addressing key dimensions of pain management for persons with burn injury. Each session is about 20 minutes and focuses on burn injury recovery and life style education. Sessions begin with a brief self-assessment and in later sessions, the participant is given graphical feedback on their progress. The lessons are narrated and include closed captioning, are animated, and include branching to provide personalized content.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Take Charge Burn - Pain (TCBR-Pain) | Experimental | The TCBR-Pain program includes 7 lessons addressing key dimensions of pain management for persons with burn injury. Each session is about 20 minutes and focuses on burn injury recovery and life style education. Sessions begin with a brief self-assessment and in later sessions, the participant is given graphical feedback on their progress. Receives: Behavioral: TCBR-Pain |
| Education attention control | No intervention | The attention group receives an educational materials that is matched to the TCBR-Pain intervention in terms of session length and time on the web-based program. The web-based Education attention condition includes 7 sessions delivered over 7 weeks. The Education Attention Control is education materials commonly employed in rehabilitation centers and has been successfully used in several studies as a comparison to active rehabilitation interventions |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Pain Severity and Pain-Related Interference
The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) will be used to assess pain severity and establish that the pain intensity inclusion criteria are met. The BPI includes two primary dimensions: pain severity (4 items) and pain interference (7 items), each rated on 0 to 10 scales.
Measured: 2 and 5 month
Secondary outcomes (3)
Change in Depression
Depression and PTSD Anxiety will be measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) . In a psychometric study of the PHQ-9, the instrument demonstrated acceptable test-retest reliability and was both sensitive (0.93) and specific (0.89) when compared to a diagnosis of major depression in persons with traumatic injury.
Measured: 2 and 5 month
Change in Participation in life activities
Participation in life activities will be measured using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scales (WHODAS-II) is a 36-item general disability instrument that has been specifically designed to use the ICIDH-2 framework to evaluate the dimensions of disability- activity and participation.
Measured: 2 and 5 month
Change in PTSD Anxiety
PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL-C). The PCL-C has demonstrated acceptable test-retest reliability and internal consistency values and good convergent validity with moderate to high correlations with other PTSD instruments and measures of anxiety and depression in persons with traumatic injury. Studies have also found that trauma survivors with PCL-C scores ≥ 45 have a greater than 75% probability of developing symptoms consistent with a diagnosis of PTSD.
Measured: 2 and 5 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2015
- Primary completion30 Sep 2019
- Study completion30 Sep 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Burn Related PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Johns Hopkins UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 137 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Phoenix Society for Burn Suvivors
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Stephen Wegener, PhD, Principal investigator, Johns Hopkins University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02661724
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB00054201
- Status last verified
- Sep 2019
- First submitted
- 13 Jan 2016
- Last updated
- 1 Oct 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Rassu FS, Staguhn E, Ravyts S, Castillo R, Wiechman SA, Kirkhart T, Aaron RV, Acton A, Ware L, Milner SM, Price LA, Fauerbach JA, Haythornthwaite JA, Wegener ST. Efficacy of an online self-management program for chronic burn pain: A randomized controlled trial of the Take Charge of Burn Pain program. Burns. 2025 Mar;51(2):107336. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2024.107336. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
PubMed 39721239Staguhn ED, Kirkhart T, Allen L, Campbell CM, Wegener ST, Castillo RC. Predictors of participation in online self-management programs: A longitudinal observational study. Rehabil Psychol. 2024 May;69(2):102-109. doi: 10.1037/rep0000521. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
PubMed 37956087
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Oct 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Take Charge of Burn Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Web-based Self-Management Intervention to Improve Burn Pain Outcomes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02661724
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB00054201
- Conditions
- Burn Related Pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 137 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Phoenix Society for Burn Suvivors
- Study start
- Apr 2015
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Persons with burn-related pain remain under treated and do not have access to comprehensive burn pain management. We seek to extend evidence-based cognitive behavioral pain management strategies to a group of burn survivors that are currently under treated for for burn pain with a specific goal of reducing pain related interference in life activities.
Investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial to test the central hypothesis that a computer-based cognitive-behavioral program (Take Charge of Burn Pain) will improve pain management, psychological health, and improve participation in burn survivors. Specific aims include: 1) to determine the efficacy of a web-based self-management intervention in reducing pain and pain-related interference and increasing pain management self-efficacy; and 2) to determine whether Take Charge of Burn Pain improves psychological health and participation in life activities in persons with burn injury pain. Emerging research suggests that web-based pain management interventions may be a feasible and effective alternative to clinic-based interventions for patients with mobility and geographic restrictions, such as those treated at tertiary burn centers.
Detailed description
Burns are among the most painful of all injuries requiring painful daily wound care and rehabilitation procedures. Despite the best efforts of burn care professionals, burns frequently result in acute and chronic suffering and poor functional outcomes for otherwise healthy individuals with many years of productive life remaining. The evidence base directing burn pain management is generally weak, with much work based on clinical preferences rather than scientific evidence. There is a tremendous need for clinical trials to evaluate and improve the standard of care. While pharmacological treatment options are widely available for burn survivors throughout the emergent, acute, and rehabilitation phases of healing there is limited access to comprehensive pain management. It is critical to establish accessible pain management approaches that address the emotional, cognitive and physical dimensions of the burn pain experience. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has proven effective for patients with chronic pain and studies have demonstrated the efficacy of providing tele-rehabilitation CBT services for improving outcomes in persons with disability. However, tele-rehabilitation CBT pain management has not been traditionally offered or studied in persons with burn-related pain. The population of burn survivors has limited access to comprehensive pain management including CBT due to lack of access, financial constraints, and mobility issues that render clinic-based CBT impractical. Innovative rehabilitation interventions and delivery methods are needed to improve pain, functional, psychological and participation outcomes in burn survivors with significant, yet untreated, pain problems.
Investigators propose to conduct a two group randomized controlled trial to test the central hypothesis that web-based CBT will improve pain severity, pain interference, self-efficacy, psychological health and participation in life activities for burn survivors with pain. Emerging research suggests that tele-rehabilitation may be a feasible, and effective alternative (with much broader applicability) to clinic-based interventions for patients with access restrictions. This project will address 2 specific aims:
Specific Aim 1: To determine the efficacy of a web-based, CBT self-management intervention (Take Charge of Burn Recovery - Pain [TCBR-Pain) in improving pain management self-efficacy, and reducing pain and pain-related interference in burn survivors with pain.
Outcomes will be measured using a battery of standardized tests at baseline, 2 month (treatment completion) and 5 month post-treatment follow-up. Self-reported pain self-efficacy, pain severity and pain interference will be measured using validated instruments (Pain Self-efficacy Scale, Brief Pain Inventory respectively).
Hypothesis 1: TCBR- Pain participants will demonstrate significantly greater improvement in pain self-efficacy, pain severity and pain interference relative to the attention-control group at 2 month (treatment completion) and 5 month follow up.
Specific Aim 2: To determine the efficacy of a web-based, CBT self-management intervention ((Take Charge of Burn Recovery - Pain [TCBR - Pain]) for improving psychological health and participation in life activities for burn survivors with pain.
Outcomes will be measured using a battery of standardized tests at baseline, 2 month (treatment completion) and 5 month follow-up. Self-reported depression and anxiety, and participation in life activities will be measured using validated instruments (PHQ-9 Depression Scale and PCL -Civilian Anxiety Scale, and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scales [WHODAS-II]) respectively.
Hypothesis 2: TCBR- Pain participants will demonstrate significantly greater improvement in depressive and anxiety symptoms and participation relative to the attention-control group at 2 month (treatment completion) and 5 month follow up.
This initial randomized trial will provide critical data on recruitment and retention as well as effect sizes and sample sizes for in the next stage of research - a multi-center, clinical trial which will determine scalability of the intervention. In the proposed study, we will consent 256 burn survivors with pain and randomly assign them to the intervention or control group. After informed oral consent is obtained, potential participants will be screened for eligibility. If eligible, (see inclusion/exclusion criteria below) participants will be consented and will complete the baseline assessment on-line. Once the web-based assessment is complete, the participants will be randomly assigned to either the web-based 7 lesson TCBR - Pain program or the 7 lesson Attention Control -Education group. Randomization will occur in balanced blocks to stratify group composition by pain level, self-reported Total Burn Surface Area, and time since initial burn injury. Participants will complete the post-intervention assessment at 2 months and again at 5 months to assess pain severity, pain interference, psychological health, and participation in life activities. Participants who obtain other treatments while enrolled in the study will be included and these other interventions will be documented and controlled in analyses if necessary. Findings from this study will support future research and dissemination efforts to improve the pain management, psychological health and life participation of patients following burn injury through innovative rehabilitation interventions and delivery methods.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Take Charge Burn - Pain (TCBR-Pain) | Experimental | Behavioral: TCBR-PainThe TCBR-Pain program includes 7 lessons addressing key dimensions of pain management for persons with burn injury. Each session is about 20 minutes and focuses on burn injury recovery and life style education. Sessions begin with a brief self-assessment and in later sessions, the participant is given graphical feedback on their progress. |
| Education attention control | No intervention | –The attention group receives an educational materials that is matched to the TCBR-Pain intervention in terms of session length and time on the web-based program. The web-based Education attention condition includes 7 sessions delivered over 7 weeks. The Education Attention Control is education materials commonly employed in rehabilitation centers and has been successfully used in several studies as a comparison to active rehabilitation interventions |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Persons ages 18 to 70 years old having experienced a burn injury requiring hospitalization at least 6 months prior to enrollment;
- Reporting a pain severity score on the Brief Pain inventory of 4 (0-10) or higher;
- Reporting pain of at least 3 months duration; and
- English speaking due to feasibility of providing the web-based intervention only in English at this time.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Significant neurological or psychiatric condition precluding informed consent.
- Lack of access to a computer that is connected to the worldwide web.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TCBR-PainThe interactive TCBR-Pain uses programmed learning, skill development and behavioral practice to engage persons with burn pain in self-management of pain and related problems. The TCB-Pain program includes 7 lessons addressing key dimensions of pain management for persons with burn injury. Each session is about 20 minutes and focuses on burn injury recovery and life style education. Sessions begin with a brief self-assessment and in later sessions, the participant is given graphical feedback on their progress. The lessons are narrated and include closed captioning, are animated, and include branching to provide personalized content. | Behavioural | Take Charge Burn - Pain (TCBR-Pain) |
Primary outcome
Change in Pain Severity and Pain-Related Interference
Time frame: 2 and 5 month
The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) will be used to assess pain severity and establish that the pain intensity inclusion criteria are met. The BPI includes two primary dimensions: pain severity (4 items) and pain interference (7 items), each rated on 0 to 10 scales.
3 secondary outcomes
Change in Depression
Time frame: 2 and 5 month
Change in Participation in life activities
Time frame: 2 and 5 month
Change in PTSD Anxiety
Time frame: 2 and 5 month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Oct 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39721239Rassu FS, Staguhn E, Ravyts S, Castillo R, Wiechman SA, Kirkhart T, Aaron RV, Acton A, Ware L, Milner SM, Price LA, Fauerbach JA, Haythornthwaite JA, Wegener ST. Efficacy of an online self-management program for chronic burn pain: A randomized controlled trial of the Take Charge of Burn Pain program. Burns. 2025 Mar;51(2):107336. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2024.107336. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37956087Staguhn ED, Kirkhart T, Allen L, Campbell CM, Wegener ST, Castillo RC. Predictors of participation in online self-management programs: A longitudinal observational study. Rehabil Psychol. 2024 May;69(2):102-109. doi: 10.1037/rep0000521. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Burn Related Pain
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Phoenixin and Pain in Pediatric Burn Patients
Children, Acute Pain
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Ultrasound Predictors of Persistent Burn Scar Pain After Blast and Drone-Related Injuries: A Prospective Cohort Study
Burn Scar Pain, Neuropathic Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Stephen Wegener, PhD principal investigator
Johns Hopkins University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing TCBR-Pain in people with Burn Related Pain, run by Johns Hopkins University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Pain Severity and Pain-Related Interference (time frame: 2 and 5 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02661724, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2019.