Cervical DystoniaPhase 2NCT02662530
Clinical and Kinematic Assessment for Determination of Botox® Injection Parameters in Cervical Dystonia
A Phase 2 study testing Botulinum Toxin Type A in people with Cervical Dystonia, run by Western University, Canada at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
This study investigates the use of a kinematic measurement device to quantify the abnormal head movements and postures in patients with cervical dystonia (CD) in order to individualize and optimize botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injection therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Dystonia
- What is being tested?
- Botulinum Toxin Type A
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 39 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Jan 2012to Jan 2021
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Consenting male and female individuals between the ages of 18 and 80
- Diagnosed with idiopathic spasmodic torticollis (also called cervical dystonia) by neurologist
- Botulinum neurotoxin type A injection(BoNT A; Botox®) naïve individuals will be randomized into either clinical-assessment arm or kinematic-assessment arm and the participants will be blinded to which arm they are a part of
- CD individuals who are receiving suboptimal BoNT-A effects will be recruited to receive kinematic-based injections. These participants will have to wait a minimum of 4 months before participating in this study
- Able to attend all study sessions
- Able to provide written consent
Who cannot join
- Pregnant individuals
- Women who are nursing
- Individuals with a known Botox® allergy
- Individuals with a known or suspected traumatic cause for the torticollis, a prior thalamotomy, or peripheral (nerve or muscle) operation
- Individuals with cervical contractures that limit passive range of motion
- Motor/nerve diseases such as myasthenia gravis, other diseases of the neuromuscular junction and/or Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
- Myotomy or denervation surgery involving the neck or shoulder region
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Clinical and Kinematic Assessment in the Determination of Botox® Injection Parameters in Cervical Dystonia Patients
This study investigates the use of a kinematic measurement device to quantify the abnormal head movements and postures in patients with cervical dystonia (CD) in order to individualize and optimize botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injection therapy. A single sensor captures five degrees of freedom of the neck and head that distinguish which muscle(s) contribute to CD and the amount of BoNT-A to inject into these muscle(s). The efficacy, relief and improvements in social, occupation and function by injections will be investigated. The efficacy of BoNT-A therapy using either BoNT-A injection parameters from clinical-based assessments and kinematically-based assessments will be investigated in CD patients. Individuals clinically diagnosed with CD will be randomized for two treatment conditions: A) injection parameters from a kinematic assessment only, or B) injection parameters from a clinical assessment only.
- Conditions
- Cervical Dystonia
- Being tested
- Botulinum Toxin Type A
- Medical subject headings
- Torticollis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Also called Botox, onabotulinumtoxinA
A serotype of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) that has specificity for cleavage of SYNAPTOSOMAL-ASSOCIATED PROTEIN 25 (SNAP-25). BoNT-A's pharmacological action is to inhibit the release of acetylcholine from the neuromuscular junction. BoNT-A peripherally applied using optimal parameters by intramuscular injections solely determined either by visual/clinical or by biomechanical analysis of dystonic movements for cervical dystonia therapy in neck and shoulder muscles every 12 weeks over 30 weeks. BoNT-A dose will range from 50-300 U.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Botulinum toxin type A clinical | Active comparator | Initial and optimization of BoNT-A injection parameters will be conducted by clinical visual assessment Receives: Drug: Botulinum Toxin Type A |
| Botulinum toxin type A kinematic | Active comparator | Initial and optimization of BoNT-A injection parameters will be conducted by kinematic assessment Receives: Drug: Botulinum Toxin Type A |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of participants with significant relief of severity and pain by TWSTRS part A and C, respectively, over treatment course
Physiological changes as a result of BoNT-A injection treatment will be assessed by validated CD assessment scale, TWSTRS part A for severity and C for pain, will be administered at each time-point to determine efficacy of using BoNT-A parameters based on clinical versus kinematics.
Measured: 30 weeks
Number of participants with significant relief of severity by objective kinematic reductions in angular deviation and amplitude measures over treatment course
Number of participants with significant relief of severity by objective kinematic reductions in angular deviation and amplitude measures over treatment course. Physiological changes in static/natural neck and head posturing, dynamic/tremor/dystonic movements superimposed on natural head position, range of motion will be assessed kinematically at each time-point. Angular deviations are calculated by degree of freedom angular bias from calibrated neutral position. Amplitude measures will be reported as root mean square values.
Measured: 30 weeks
Secondary outcomes (2)
Number of participants with significant improvement in functional disability scores assessed by TWSTRS part B and patient-reported scores pre- and post-BoNT-A parameters determined visually or kinematically.
Change in functional disability, quality of life and relief of pain as a result of BoNT-A injection treatment will be measured will be measured by comparing pre- and post-injection TWSTRS.
Measured: 30 weeks
Number of participants with significant relief of severity by global impression of change scores over treatment course
Number of participants with significant relief of severity and pain by global impression of change scores over treatment course. This scale is a self-reported by participant on a VAS/Likert scale.
Measured: 30 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2012
- Primary completionDec 2020 (estimated)
- Study completionJan 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cervical DystoniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Western University, CanadaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 39 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Western University, Canada
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mandar Jog, Western University, Canada
- Investigators
- Mandar Jog, MD, Principal investigator, London Health Sciences Centre
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02662530
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 105515
- Status last verified
- Jun 2020
- First submitted
- 7 Jan 2016
- Last updated
- 22 Jun 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Brans JW, Lindeboom R, Snoek JW, Zwarts MJ, van Weerden TW, Brunt ER, van Hilten JJ, van der Kamp W, Prins MH, Speelman JD. Botulinum toxin versus trihexyphenidyl in cervical dystonia: a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial. Neurology. 1996 Apr;46(4):1066-72. doi: 10.1212/wnl.46.4.1066.
PubMed 8780093Caleo M, Antonucci F, Restani L, Mazzocchio R. A reappraisal of the central effects of botulinum neurotoxin type A: by what mechanism? J Neurochem. 2009 Apr;109(1):15-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.05887.x. Epub 2009 Feb 11.
PubMed 19154335Dressler D. Botulinum toxin for treatment of dystonia. Eur J Neurol. 2010 Jul;17 Suppl 1:88-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03058.x.
PubMed 20590814Evidente VG, Truong D, Jankovic J, Comella CL, Grafe S, Hanschmann A. IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin(R)) injected for blepharospasm or cervical dystonia according to patient needs is well tolerated. J Neurol Sci. 2014 Nov 15;346(1-2):116-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Aug 10.
PubMed 25186131Evidente VG, Pappert EJ. Botulinum toxin therapy for cervical dystonia: the science of dosing. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2014 Nov 12;4:273. doi: 10.7916/D84X56BF. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 25414799Werdelin L, Dalager T, Fuglsang-Frederiksen A, Regeur L, Karlsborg M, Korbo L, Munck O, Winge K. The utility of EMG interference pattern analysis in botulinum toxin treatment of torticollis: a randomised, controlled and blinded study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Nov;122(11):2305-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.04.012. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
PubMed 21636319Raez MB, Hussain MS, Mohd-Yasin F. Techniques of EMG signal analysis: detection, processing, classification and applications. Biol Proced Online. 2006;8:11-35. doi: 10.1251/bpo115. Epub 2006 Mar 23.
PubMed 16799694
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jun 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Clinical and Kinematic Assessment in the Determination of Botox® Injection Parameters in Cervical Dystonia Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02662530
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 105515
- Conditions
- Cervical Dystonia
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 39 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Western University, CanadaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jan 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study investigates the use of a kinematic measurement device to quantify the abnormal head movements and postures in patients with cervical dystonia (CD) in order to individualize and optimize botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injection therapy. A single sensor captures five degrees of freedom of the neck and head that distinguish which muscle(s) contribute to CD and the amount of BoNT-A to inject into these muscle(s). The efficacy, relief and improvements in social, occupation and function by injections will be investigated. The efficacy of BoNT-A therapy using either BoNT-A injection parameters from clinical-based assessments and kinematically-based assessments will be investigated in CD patients. Individuals clinically diagnosed with CD will be randomized for two treatment conditions: A) injection parameters from a kinematic assessment only, or B) injection parameters from a clinical assessment only.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Botulinum toxin type A clinical | Active comparator | Drug: Botulinum Toxin Type AInitial and optimization of BoNT-A injection parameters will be conducted by clinical visual assessment |
| Botulinum toxin type A kinematic | Active comparator | Drug: Botulinum Toxin Type AInitial and optimization of BoNT-A injection parameters will be conducted by kinematic assessment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Consenting male and female individuals between the ages of 18 and 80
- Diagnosed with idiopathic spasmodic torticollis (also called cervical dystonia) by neurologist
- Botulinum neurotoxin type A injection(BoNT A; Botox®) naïve individuals will be randomized into either clinical-assessment arm or kinematic-assessment arm and the participants will be blinded to which arm they are a part of
- CD individuals who are receiving suboptimal BoNT-A effects will be recruited to receive kinematic-based injections. These participants will have to wait a minimum of 4 months before participating in this study
- Able to attend all study sessions
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Pregnant individuals
- Women who are nursing
- Individuals with a known Botox® allergy
- Individuals with a known or suspected traumatic cause for the torticollis, a prior thalamotomy, or peripheral (nerve or muscle) operation
- Individuals with cervical contractures that limit passive range of motion
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Botulinum Toxin Type AAlso: Botox, onabotulinumtoxinAA serotype of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) that has specificity for cleavage of SYNAPTOSOMAL-ASSOCIATED PROTEIN 25 (SNAP-25). BoNT-A's pharmacological action is to inhibit the release of acetylcholine from the neuromuscular junction. BoNT-A peripherally applied using optimal parameters by intramuscular injections solely determined either by visual/clinical or by biomechanical analysis of dystonic movements for cervical dystonia therapy in neck and shoulder muscles every 12 weeks over 30 weeks. BoNT-A dose will range from 50-300 U. | Drug | Botulinum toxin type A clinical, Botulinum toxin type A kinematic |
Primary outcome
Number of participants with significant relief of severity and pain by TWSTRS part A and C, respectively, over treatment course
Time frame: 30 weeks
Physiological changes as a result of BoNT-A injection treatment will be assessed by validated CD assessment scale, TWSTRS part A for severity and C for pain, will be administered at each time-point to determine efficacy of using BoNT-A parameters based on clinical versus kinematics.
Number of participants with significant relief of severity by objective kinematic reductions in angular deviation and amplitude measures over treatment course
Time frame: 30 weeks
Number of participants with significant relief of severity by objective kinematic reductions in angular deviation and amplitude measures over treatment course. Physiological changes in static/natural neck and head posturing, dynamic/tremor/dystonic movements superimposed on natural head position, range of motion will be assessed kinematically at each time-point. Angular deviations are calculated by degree of freedom angular bias from calibrated neutral position. Amplitude measures will be reported as root mean square values.
2 secondary outcomes
Number of participants with significant improvement in functional disability scores assessed by TWSTRS part B and patient-reported scores pre- and post-BoNT-A parameters determined visually or kinematically.
Time frame: 30 weeks
Number of participants with significant relief of severity by global impression of change scores over treatment course
Time frame: 30 weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jun 2020.
- Background: PubMed 8780093Brans JW, Lindeboom R, Snoek JW, Zwarts MJ, van Weerden TW, Brunt ER, van Hilten JJ, van der Kamp W, Prins MH, Speelman JD. Botulinum toxin versus trihexyphenidyl in cervical dystonia: a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial. Neurology. 1996 Apr;46(4):1066-72. doi: 10.1212/wnl.46.4.1066.
- Background: PubMed 19154335Caleo M, Antonucci F, Restani L, Mazzocchio R. A reappraisal of the central effects of botulinum neurotoxin type A: by what mechanism? J Neurochem. 2009 Apr;109(1):15-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.05887.x. Epub 2009 Feb 11.
- Background: PubMed 20590814Dressler D. Botulinum toxin for treatment of dystonia. Eur J Neurol. 2010 Jul;17 Suppl 1:88-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03058.x.
- Background: PubMed 25186131Evidente VG, Truong D, Jankovic J, Comella CL, Grafe S, Hanschmann A. IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin(R)) injected for blepharospasm or cervical dystonia according to patient needs is well tolerated. J Neurol Sci. 2014 Nov 15;346(1-2):116-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Aug 10.
- Background: PubMed 25414799Evidente VG, Pappert EJ. Botulinum toxin therapy for cervical dystonia: the science of dosing. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2014 Nov 12;4:273. doi: 10.7916/D84X56BF. eCollection 2014.
- Background: PubMed 21636319Werdelin L, Dalager T, Fuglsang-Frederiksen A, Regeur L, Karlsborg M, Korbo L, Munck O, Winge K. The utility of EMG interference pattern analysis in botulinum toxin treatment of torticollis: a randomised, controlled and blinded study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Nov;122(11):2305-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.04.012. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
- Background: PubMed 16799694Raez MB, Hussain MS, Mohd-Yasin F. Techniques of EMG signal analysis: detection, processing, classification and applications. Biol Proced Online. 2006;8:11-35. doi: 10.1251/bpo115. Epub 2006 Mar 23.
Related trials for Cervical Dystonia
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
Accelerating TMS for Cervical Dystonia
Isolated Cervical Dystonia
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of VIM0423 in Individuals With Isolated Dystonia
Dystonia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Assessment of Cervical Range of Motion Restrictions in Infants With Arthrogenic Torticollis - A Feasibility Study
Torticollis (Arthrogenic)
Recruiting
Effect of Vibro-tactile Stimulation Intensity on Head Posture in Cervical Dystonia
Cervical Dystonia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
An Observational Study of Individuals With Isolated Dystonia
Isolated/Primary Dystonia That Affects More Than One Region of the Body
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mandar Jog, MD principal investigator
London Health Sciences Centre
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Botulinum Toxin Type A in people with Cervical Dystonia, run by Western University, Canada at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of participants with significant relief of severity and pain by TWSTRS part A and C, respectively, over treatment course (time frame: 30 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02662530, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jun 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.