AzTrials
AzTrials

Systemic Lupus ErythematosusPhase 2NCT02665364

Phase IIb Study of IFN-K in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

A Phase 2 study testing IFNα-Kinoid and ISA 51 VG in people with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, run by Neovacs at 101 sites in 21 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The safety and immunogenicity of the IFNα-Kinoid (IFN-K) have been evaluated in a phase I clinical study conducted in subjects with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Preliminary results showed acceptable safety profile and patients developped antibodies response. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
What is being tested?
IFNα-Kinoid and ISA 51 VG
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
185 participants
Where
101 sitesin 21 countries
Study dates
23 Sep 2015to 4 Feb 2020
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Has had a diagnosis of SLE according to current American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria (4 of 11 ACR criteria)
  • Has SLEDAI-2K ≥ 6
  • Has at least 1 BILAG A and/or at least 2 BILAG B
  • Has a positive IFN gene signature by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)
  • Has anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) ≥ 1:160 and/or anti-dsDNA antibodies ≥ 7.0 IU/mL
  • Currently receiving at least one treatment for SLE

Who cannot join

  • Has active, severe lupus nephritis as defined either by the immediate need for cyclophosphamide treatment or by renal BILAG A
  • Has active, severe, neuropsychiatric SLE, defined as neuropsychiatric BILAG A
  • Has been treated with corticosteroids (CS) at a dose of >20 mg of prednisone equivalent/day for > 7 consecutive days
  • Is currently receiving or has received pulse dose CS (≥ 250 mg prednisone equivalent/day)
  • Has received potent immunosuppressive drugs
  • Has received abatacept, sifalimumab, rontalizumab, anifrolumab, belimumab, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists or another registered or investigational biological therapy
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Has received anti-B-cell therapy (e.g., rituximab, epratuzumab)
  • Has frequent recurrences of oral or genital herpes simplex lesions
  • Is at high risk of significant infection and/or has any current signs or symptoms of infection at entry or has received intravenous antibiotics
  • Has received any live vaccine
  • Has used any investigational or non-registered product or any investigational or non-registered vaccine
  • Is high-risk human papilloma virus (HPV) positive by rRT-qPCR on a cervical swab
  • Has cytological abnormalities ≥ high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) on a cervical swab

Trial locations and contacts

101 sites in 21 countries.

101 sites in 21 countries

United States13 sites
  • Research Site

    Austin, Texas, 78731

  • Research Site

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210

  • Research Site

    Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33309

  • Research Site

    Fort Myers, Florida, 33901

  • Research Site

    La Jolla, California, 92037

  • Research Site

    Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205

  • Research Site

    Los Angeles, California, 90017

  • Research Site

    Miami, Florida, 33126

  • Research Site

    Miami, Florida, 33134

  • Research Site

    Miami, Florida, 33136

  • Research Site

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104

  • Research Site

    Orlando, Florida, 32810

  • Research Site

    Tampa, Florida, 33614

Other trials in United States

Russia11 sites
  • Research Site

    Chelyabinsk, 454076

  • Research Site

    Kemerovo, 650000

  • Research Site

    Kemerovo, 650066

  • Research Site

    Moscow, 119333

  • Research Site

    Omsk, 644024

  • Research Site

    Omsk, 644111

  • Research Site

    Orenburg, 460018

  • Research Site

    Saint Petersburg, 191015

  • Research Site

    Saint Petersburg, 196066

  • Research Site

    Saratov, 410054

  • Research Site

    Yekaterinburg, 620102

Other trials in Russia

Mexico9 sites
  • Research Site

    Cuernavaca, 62290

  • Research Site

    Guadalajara, 44130

  • Research Site

    Guadalajara, 44160

  • Research Site

    Guadalajara, 44280

  • Research Site

    Guadalajara, 44500

  • Research Site

    Guadalajara, 44690

  • Research Site

    León, 37000

  • Research Site

    México, 06700

  • Research Site

    México, 07760

Other trials in Mexico

Poland7 sites
  • Research Site

    Bytom, 41-902

  • Research Site

    Krakow, 31-121

  • Research Site

    Poznan, 61-397

  • Research Site

    Sosnowiec, 41-200

  • Research Site

    Szczecin, 71 - 252

  • Research Site

    Warsaw, 02-691

  • Research Site

    Wroclaw, 52-416

Other trials in Poland

Colombia6 sites
  • Research Site

    Barranquilla, 080002

  • Research Site

    Bogotá, 110221

  • Research Site

    Bogotá, 111211

  • Research Site

    Bucaramanga, 680003

  • Research Site

    Medellín, Antioquia, 050034

  • Research Site

    Zipaquirá, 250252

Other trials in Colombia

France6 sites
  • Research Site

    Lille, 59037

  • Research Site

    Marseille, 13003

  • Research Site

    Montpellier, 34295

  • Research Site

    Paris, 75679

  • Research Site

    Pessac, Bordeaux, 33600

  • Research site

    Strasbourg, 67098

Other trials in France

Italy6 sites
  • Research Site

    Bologna, 40138

  • Research Site

    Milan, 20122

  • Research Site

    Pavia, 27100

  • Research Site

    Pisa, 56126

  • Research Site

    Rome, Roma, 00161

  • Research Site

    Verona, 37134

Other trials in Italy

Peru6 sites
  • Research Site

    Lima, 13

  • Research Site

    Lima, 27

  • Research Site

    Lima, 29

  • Research Site

    Lima, 31

  • Research Site

    Lima, 33

  • Research Site

    Lima, 41

Other trials in Peru

Chile5 sites
  • Research Site

    Santiago, 7500710

  • Research Site

    Santiago, 7501126

  • Research Site

    Santiago, 7510047

  • Research Site

    Santiago, 7510186

  • Research Site

    Santiago, 7640881

Other trials in Chile

Germany5 sites
  • Research site

    Bad Nauheim, 61231

  • Research Site

    Berlin, 14059

  • Research Site

    Hanover, 130625

  • Research Site

    Mainz, 55131

  • Research Site

    Munich, 80639

Other trials in Germany

Taiwan5 sites
  • Research Site

    Taichung, 40201

  • Research Site

    Taichung, 40402

  • Research Site

    Taipei, 100

  • Research Site

    Taipei, 112

  • Research Site

    Taipei, 114

Other trials in Taiwan

Tunisia5 sites
  • Research Site

    Sfax, 3029

  • Research Site

    Sousse, 4000

  • Research Site

    Sousse

  • Research Site

    Tunis, 1007

  • Research Site

    Tunis, 1008

Other trials in Tunisia

Philippines4 sites
  • Research Site

    Cebu, 6000

  • Research Site

    Davao City, 8000

  • Research Site

    Manila, 1000

  • Research Site

    Quezon, 1102

Other trials in Philippines

Georgia3 sites
  • Research Site

    Tbilisi, 0159

  • Research Site

    Tbilisi, 0160

  • Research Site

    Tbilisi, 0186

Other trials in Georgia

Moldova2 sites
  • Research Site

    Chisinau, 2025

  • Research Site

    Chisinau, 2026

Other trials in Moldova

South Korea2 sites
  • Research Site

    Seoul, 07061

  • Research Site

    Seoul, 07345

Other trials in South Korea

Thailand2 sites
  • Research Site

    Bangkok, 10400

  • Research Site

    Bangkok, 10700

Other trials in Thailand

Argentina1 site
  • Research Site

    Buenos Aires

Other trials in Argentina

Belgium1 site
  • Research Site

    Brussels, 1200

Other trials in Belgium

Croatia1 site
  • Research Site

    Zagreb, 10000

Other trials in Croatia

Switzerland1 site
  • Research Site

    Lausanne, 1011

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: A Phase IIb, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Neutralization of the Interferon Gene Signature and the Clinical Efficacy of IFNα-Kinoid in Adult Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

The safety and immunogenicity of the IFNα-Kinoid (IFN-K) have been evaluated in a phase I clinical study conducted in subjects with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Preliminary results showed acceptable safety profile and patients developped antibodies response.

The principal aim of the present study is to confirm the neutralization of the interferon gene signature and the clinical efficacy of IFN-K in subjects with SLE. In addition, the immune responses and the safety elicited by IFN-K will also be evaluated.

Being tested
IFNα-Kinoid, Placebo, ISA 51 VG
Medical subject headings
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • IFNα-KinoidBiological

  • PlaceboOther

  • ISA 51 VGOther

Study groups in NCT02665364
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
IFNα-KinoidExperimentalIFNα-Kinoid (IFN-K) adjuvanted with ISA 51 VG via intramuscular injection. 1 administration of 240 μg at W0, W1, W4 and 1 administration of 120 μg at month 3 (W12) and month 6 (W24) in addition to standard of care treatment.
Receives: Biological: IFNα-Kinoid; Other: ISA 51 VG
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorPlacebo normal saline (0.9% Sodium Chloride) adjuvanted with ISA 51 VG via intramuscular injection. 1 administration of 240 μg at week (W)0, W1, W4 and 1 administration of 120 μg at month 3 (W12) and month 6 (W24) in addition to standard of care treatment.
Receives: Other: Placebo; Other: ISA 51 VG

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percent Change From Baseline in IFN Gene Signature at W36

    The biological endpoint aimed at evaluating the neutralization of the IFN gene signature following treatment with IFN-K compared to placebo, as measured by the % change from baseline of the expression of IFN-induced genes.

    Measured: Baseline and Last Available Value (LVA) between week 24 and week 36

  2. Number of Participants Who Achieved a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) With Superimposed CS Tapering at Week 36

    British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) responder was defined as a subject who had the following criteria at week 36:

    • All BILAG A scores at baseline improve to B/C/D and all BILAG B scores improve to C/D at W36, and
    • No BILAG worsening in other body systems: no new BILAG A or ≥ 2 new BILAG B scores at W36, and
    • No worsening in SLEDAI-2K total score at W36 compared with baseline, and
    • No deterioration in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) (< 10% worsening) on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 100 mm at W36 compared with baseline, and
    • No addition or increased dose level of anti-malarial drugs or immunosuppressive drugs or CS* between W24 and W36 (*≤5 mg prednisolone or equivalent /day at W24 and no increase until W36).

    Measured: At Week 36

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Number of Participants Who Achieved a Systematic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index (SRI)-4 at Week 36

    SLE Responder Index (SRI); SRI-4 responder was defined as a subject who had the following criteria at week 36:

    • reduction ≥4 points in SELENA-SLEDAI at week 36 compared with baseline, and
    • no new BILAG A at week 36, and
    • no more than 1 new BILAG B at week 36, and
    • no deterioration in PGA (<10% worsening) on 100-mm VAS compared with baseline

    Measured: W36 (9 months)

  2. Number of Participants Who Achieved a Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) at Week 36

    Lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) was conceptually defined as 'a state which, if sustained, is associated with a low likelihood of adverse outcome, considering disease activity and medication safety'. Subsequently defined using consensus methodology, LLDAS is attained if all the following items are met:

    • SLEDAI-2K ≤4, with no activity in major organ systems (renal, central nervous system (CNS), cardiopulmonary, vasculitis, fever) and no hemolytic anemia or gastrointestinal activity
    • No new features of lupus disease activity compared with the previous assessment
    • SELENA-SLEDAI physician global assessment (PGA, scale 0-3) ≤1
    • Current prednisolone (or equivalent) dose ≤7.5 mg daily
    • Well tolerated standard maintenance doses of immunosuppressive drugs and approved biological agents, excluding investigational drugs

    Measured: At Week 36

  3. BILAG Global Score Change From Baseline to Last Available Value (LVA) Between Week 24 and Week 36

    British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-2004 index, it categorizes disease activity into 5 different levels from A to E, with Grade A representing very active disease and Grade E indicating no current or previous disease activity. Scoring was based on a total of 101 items, grouped into 9 organ/systems and the summation of the numerical values for the nine-system scores was given by the following formula: Numerical global score = A*12 + B*8 + C*1, where A, B and C represent the number of Grades A, B and C respectively at each assessment. Grades D and E are considered as 0 (Chee-Seng Yee et al, 2010). The minimum score is 0 with no predefined maximum. The higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    The BILAG global score change from baseline to Last Available Value (LVA) week 24 and week 36 were presented analyzed.

    Measured: Last Available Value (LVA) between week 24 and week 36

  4. SELENA-SLEDAI - Change From Baseline to Week 36

    Safety of Estrogens in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA)-SLEDAI, is a slightly modified version of the SLEDAI. This is a weighted index in which signs and symptoms, laboratory tests, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) for each of nine organ systems are given a weighted score and summed up if present at the time of the visit or in the preceding 10 days. The maximum theoretical score for the SELENA SLEDAI is 105 (all 24 descriptors present simultaneously) with 0 indicating inactive disease.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 36

  5. SLICC/ACR-DI Change From Baseline at Week 36

    Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLICC/ACR-DI) captures permanent changes which have occurred in patients with SLE, regardless of causality. The questionnaire contains 41 items covering 12 different organ systems. The score of items ranges from 1 to 3 and the total score from 0 to 47. By definition score 0 corresponds to diagnostics and damage over time can only be stable or increase, theoretically to a maximum of 47 points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 36

  6. CLASI Total Activity Change From Baseline at Week 36

    Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) was specifically developed to assess the cutaneous manifestations of SLE. It measures both disease activity and permanent damage (e.g. dyspigmentation and scarring) over the entire body surface. CLASI total activity score ranges from 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating more severe skin disease.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 36

  7. Number of Participants Who Achieved a Composite SRI-4 Including CS ≤7,5mg/Day at Week 36

    SRI (4) plus CS ≤ 7.5 mg/day responder was defined as a participant who had the following criteria at week 36:

    • reduction ≥4 points in SELENA-SLEDAI at week 36 compared with baseline, and
    • no new BILAG A at week 36, and
    • no more than 1 new BILAG B at week 36, and
    • no deterioration in PGA (<10% worsening) on 100-mm VAS compared with baseline plus CS ≤7.5mg equivalent prednisolone per day at week 36

    Measured: At Week 36

  8. Number of Participants Who Achieved a Composite SRI-4 Including CS ≤5mg/Day at Week 36

    SRI-4 plus CS ≤ 5mg/day responder was defined as a participant who had the following criteria at Week 36:

    • reduction ≥4 points in SELENA-SLEDAI at week 36 compared with baseline, and
    • no new BILAG A at week 36, and
    • no more than 1 new BILAG B at week 36, and
    • no deterioration in PGA (<10% worsening) on 100-mm VAS compared with baseline plus corticosteroids (CS) ≤5mg equivalent prednisolone per day at week 36

    Measured: At Week 36

  9. Number of Participants With Neutralizing Anti-IFN-alpha Antibodies at W36

    Individual serum antibody neutralizing capacity against recombinant IFN-alpha2b was measured by reporter gene assay using Interferon Sensitive Response Element (ISRE) reporter.

    Measured: At week 36

  10. Number of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events

    Number of participants who reported any treatment-related adverse events until month 9

    Measured: 9 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Jan 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start23 Sep 2015
  3. Primary completion15 Mar 2018
  4. Study completion4 Feb 2020

Why it stopped: Reorganization proceedings of the sponsor

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
185 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02665364
Sponsor's protocol ID
IFN-K-002
Status last verified
Mar 2020
First submitted
17 Nov 2015
Last updated
9 Apr 2020
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Hannon CW, McCourt C, Lima HC, Chen S, Bennett C. Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 9;3(3):CD007478. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007478.pub2.

    PubMed 33687069
  • Houssiau FA, Thanou A, Mazur M, Ramiterre E, Gomez Mora DA, Misterska-Skora M, Perich-Campos RA, Smakotina SA, Cerpa Cruz S, Louzir B, Croughs T, Tee ML. IFN-alpha kinoid in systemic lupus erythematosus: results from a phase IIb, randomised, placebo-controlled study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Mar;79(3):347-355. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216379. Epub 2019 Dec 23.

    PubMed 31871140

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing IFNα-Kinoid and ISA 51 VG in people with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, run by Neovacs at 101 sites in 21 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 101 sites in United States, Russia, Mexico, Poland, Colombia and 16 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Mar 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percent Change From Baseline in IFN Gene Signature at W36 (time frame: Baseline and Last Available Value (LVA) between week 24 and week 36). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02665364, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Apr 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in