Systemic Lupus ErythematosusPhase 2NCT02665364
Phase IIb Study of IFN-K in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
A Phase 2 study testing IFNα-Kinoid and ISA 51 VG in people with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, run by Neovacs at 101 sites in 21 countries.
Trial summary
The safety and immunogenicity of the IFNα-Kinoid (IFN-K) have been evaluated in a phase I clinical study conducted in subjects with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Preliminary results showed acceptable safety profile and patients developped antibodies response. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- What is being tested?
- IFNα-Kinoid and ISA 51 VG
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 185 participants
- Where
- 101 sitesin 21 countries
- Study dates
- 23 Sep 2015to 4 Feb 2020
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Has had a diagnosis of SLE according to current American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria (4 of 11 ACR criteria)
- Has SLEDAI-2K ≥ 6
- Has at least 1 BILAG A and/or at least 2 BILAG B
- Has a positive IFN gene signature by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)
- Has anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) ≥ 1:160 and/or anti-dsDNA antibodies ≥ 7.0 IU/mL
- Currently receiving at least one treatment for SLE
Who cannot join
- Has active, severe lupus nephritis as defined either by the immediate need for cyclophosphamide treatment or by renal BILAG A
- Has active, severe, neuropsychiatric SLE, defined as neuropsychiatric BILAG A
- Has been treated with corticosteroids (CS) at a dose of >20 mg of prednisone equivalent/day for > 7 consecutive days
- Is currently receiving or has received pulse dose CS (≥ 250 mg prednisone equivalent/day)
- Has received potent immunosuppressive drugs
- Has received abatacept, sifalimumab, rontalizumab, anifrolumab, belimumab, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists or another registered or investigational biological therapy
Show all 13Show fewer
- Has received anti-B-cell therapy (e.g., rituximab, epratuzumab)
- Has frequent recurrences of oral or genital herpes simplex lesions
- Is at high risk of significant infection and/or has any current signs or symptoms of infection at entry or has received intravenous antibiotics
- Has received any live vaccine
- Has used any investigational or non-registered product or any investigational or non-registered vaccine
- Is high-risk human papilloma virus (HPV) positive by rRT-qPCR on a cervical swab
- Has cytological abnormalities ≥ high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) on a cervical swab
Trial locations and contacts
101 sites in 21 countries.
101 sites in 21 countries
United States13 sites
Research Site
Austin, Texas, 78731
Research Site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210
Research Site
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33309
Research Site
Fort Myers, Florida, 33901
Research Site
La Jolla, California, 92037
Research Site
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
Research Site
Los Angeles, California, 90017
Research Site
Miami, Florida, 33126
Research Site
Miami, Florida, 33134
Research Site
Miami, Florida, 33136
Research Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
Research Site
Orlando, Florida, 32810
Research Site
Tampa, Florida, 33614
Russia11 sites
Research Site
Chelyabinsk, 454076
Research Site
Kemerovo, 650000
Research Site
Kemerovo, 650066
Research Site
Moscow, 119333
Research Site
Omsk, 644024
Research Site
Omsk, 644111
Research Site
Orenburg, 460018
Research Site
Saint Petersburg, 191015
Research Site
Saint Petersburg, 196066
Research Site
Saratov, 410054
Research Site
Yekaterinburg, 620102
Mexico9 sites
Research Site
Cuernavaca, 62290
Research Site
Guadalajara, 44130
Research Site
Guadalajara, 44160
Research Site
Guadalajara, 44280
Research Site
Guadalajara, 44500
Research Site
Guadalajara, 44690
Research Site
León, 37000
Research Site
México, 06700
Research Site
México, 07760
Poland7 sites
Research Site
Bytom, 41-902
Research Site
Krakow, 31-121
Research Site
Poznan, 61-397
Research Site
Sosnowiec, 41-200
Research Site
Szczecin, 71 - 252
Research Site
Warsaw, 02-691
Research Site
Wroclaw, 52-416
Colombia6 sites
Research Site
Barranquilla, 080002
Research Site
Bogotá, 110221
Research Site
Bogotá, 111211
Research Site
Bucaramanga, 680003
Research Site
Medellín, Antioquia, 050034
Research Site
Zipaquirá, 250252
France6 sites
Research Site
Lille, 59037
Research Site
Marseille, 13003
Research Site
Montpellier, 34295
Research Site
Paris, 75679
Research Site
Pessac, Bordeaux, 33600
Research site
Strasbourg, 67098
Italy6 sites
Research Site
Bologna, 40138
Research Site
Milan, 20122
Research Site
Pavia, 27100
Research Site
Pisa, 56126
Research Site
Rome, Roma, 00161
Research Site
Verona, 37134
Peru6 sites
Research Site
Lima, 13
Research Site
Lima, 27
Research Site
Lima, 29
Research Site
Lima, 31
Research Site
Lima, 33
Research Site
Lima, 41
Chile5 sites
Research Site
Santiago, 7500710
Research Site
Santiago, 7501126
Research Site
Santiago, 7510047
Research Site
Santiago, 7510186
Research Site
Santiago, 7640881
Germany5 sites
Research site
Bad Nauheim, 61231
Research Site
Berlin, 14059
Research Site
Hanover, 130625
Research Site
Mainz, 55131
Research Site
Munich, 80639
Taiwan5 sites
Research Site
Taichung, 40201
Research Site
Taichung, 40402
Research Site
Taipei, 100
Research Site
Taipei, 112
Research Site
Taipei, 114
Tunisia5 sites
Research Site
Sfax, 3029
Research Site
Sousse, 4000
Research Site
Sousse
Research Site
Tunis, 1007
Research Site
Tunis, 1008
Philippines4 sites
Research Site
Cebu, 6000
Research Site
Davao City, 8000
Research Site
Manila, 1000
Research Site
Quezon, 1102
Georgia3 sites
Research Site
Tbilisi, 0159
Research Site
Tbilisi, 0160
Research Site
Tbilisi, 0186
About this study
Official title: A Phase IIb, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Neutralization of the Interferon Gene Signature and the Clinical Efficacy of IFNα-Kinoid in Adult Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
The safety and immunogenicity of the IFNα-Kinoid (IFN-K) have been evaluated in a phase I clinical study conducted in subjects with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Preliminary results showed acceptable safety profile and patients developped antibodies response.
The principal aim of the present study is to confirm the neutralization of the interferon gene signature and the clinical efficacy of IFN-K in subjects with SLE. In addition, the immune responses and the safety elicited by IFN-K will also be evaluated.
- Conditions
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- Being tested
- IFNα-Kinoid, Placebo, ISA 51 VG
- Medical subject headings
- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
IFNα-KinoidBiological
PlaceboOther
ISA 51 VGOther
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| IFNα-Kinoid | Experimental | IFNα-Kinoid (IFN-K) adjuvanted with ISA 51 VG via intramuscular injection. 1 administration of 240 μg at W0, W1, W4 and 1 administration of 120 μg at month 3 (W12) and month 6 (W24) in addition to standard of care treatment. Receives: Biological: IFNα-Kinoid; Other: ISA 51 VG |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo normal saline (0.9% Sodium Chloride) adjuvanted with ISA 51 VG via intramuscular injection. 1 administration of 240 μg at week (W)0, W1, W4 and 1 administration of 120 μg at month 3 (W12) and month 6 (W24) in addition to standard of care treatment. Receives: Other: Placebo; Other: ISA 51 VG |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent Change From Baseline in IFN Gene Signature at W36
The biological endpoint aimed at evaluating the neutralization of the IFN gene signature following treatment with IFN-K compared to placebo, as measured by the % change from baseline of the expression of IFN-induced genes.
Measured: Baseline and Last Available Value (LVA) between week 24 and week 36
Number of Participants Who Achieved a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) With Superimposed CS Tapering at Week 36
British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) responder was defined as a subject who had the following criteria at week 36:
- All BILAG A scores at baseline improve to B/C/D and all BILAG B scores improve to C/D at W36, and
- No BILAG worsening in other body systems: no new BILAG A or ≥ 2 new BILAG B scores at W36, and
- No worsening in SLEDAI-2K total score at W36 compared with baseline, and
- No deterioration in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) (< 10% worsening) on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 100 mm at W36 compared with baseline, and
- No addition or increased dose level of anti-malarial drugs or immunosuppressive drugs or CS* between W24 and W36 (*≤5 mg prednisolone or equivalent /day at W24 and no increase until W36).
Measured: At Week 36
Secondary outcomes (10)
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Systematic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index (SRI)-4 at Week 36
SLE Responder Index (SRI); SRI-4 responder was defined as a subject who had the following criteria at week 36:
- reduction ≥4 points in SELENA-SLEDAI at week 36 compared with baseline, and
- no new BILAG A at week 36, and
- no more than 1 new BILAG B at week 36, and
- no deterioration in PGA (<10% worsening) on 100-mm VAS compared with baseline
Measured: W36 (9 months)
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) at Week 36
Lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) was conceptually defined as 'a state which, if sustained, is associated with a low likelihood of adverse outcome, considering disease activity and medication safety'. Subsequently defined using consensus methodology, LLDAS is attained if all the following items are met:
- SLEDAI-2K ≤4, with no activity in major organ systems (renal, central nervous system (CNS), cardiopulmonary, vasculitis, fever) and no hemolytic anemia or gastrointestinal activity
- No new features of lupus disease activity compared with the previous assessment
- SELENA-SLEDAI physician global assessment (PGA, scale 0-3) ≤1
- Current prednisolone (or equivalent) dose ≤7.5 mg daily
- Well tolerated standard maintenance doses of immunosuppressive drugs and approved biological agents, excluding investigational drugs
Measured: At Week 36
BILAG Global Score Change From Baseline to Last Available Value (LVA) Between Week 24 and Week 36
British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-2004 index, it categorizes disease activity into 5 different levels from A to E, with Grade A representing very active disease and Grade E indicating no current or previous disease activity. Scoring was based on a total of 101 items, grouped into 9 organ/systems and the summation of the numerical values for the nine-system scores was given by the following formula: Numerical global score = A*12 + B*8 + C*1, where A, B and C represent the number of Grades A, B and C respectively at each assessment. Grades D and E are considered as 0 (Chee-Seng Yee et al, 2010). The minimum score is 0 with no predefined maximum. The higher scores mean a worse outcome.
The BILAG global score change from baseline to Last Available Value (LVA) week 24 and week 36 were presented analyzed.
Measured: Last Available Value (LVA) between week 24 and week 36
SELENA-SLEDAI - Change From Baseline to Week 36
Safety of Estrogens in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA)-SLEDAI, is a slightly modified version of the SLEDAI. This is a weighted index in which signs and symptoms, laboratory tests, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) for each of nine organ systems are given a weighted score and summed up if present at the time of the visit or in the preceding 10 days. The maximum theoretical score for the SELENA SLEDAI is 105 (all 24 descriptors present simultaneously) with 0 indicating inactive disease.
Measured: Baseline and Week 36
SLICC/ACR-DI Change From Baseline at Week 36
Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLICC/ACR-DI) captures permanent changes which have occurred in patients with SLE, regardless of causality. The questionnaire contains 41 items covering 12 different organ systems. The score of items ranges from 1 to 3 and the total score from 0 to 47. By definition score 0 corresponds to diagnostics and damage over time can only be stable or increase, theoretically to a maximum of 47 points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 36
CLASI Total Activity Change From Baseline at Week 36
Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) was specifically developed to assess the cutaneous manifestations of SLE. It measures both disease activity and permanent damage (e.g. dyspigmentation and scarring) over the entire body surface. CLASI total activity score ranges from 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating more severe skin disease.
Measured: Baseline and Week 36
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Composite SRI-4 Including CS ≤7,5mg/Day at Week 36
SRI (4) plus CS ≤ 7.5 mg/day responder was defined as a participant who had the following criteria at week 36:
- reduction ≥4 points in SELENA-SLEDAI at week 36 compared with baseline, and
- no new BILAG A at week 36, and
- no more than 1 new BILAG B at week 36, and
- no deterioration in PGA (<10% worsening) on 100-mm VAS compared with baseline plus CS ≤7.5mg equivalent prednisolone per day at week 36
Measured: At Week 36
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Composite SRI-4 Including CS ≤5mg/Day at Week 36
SRI-4 plus CS ≤ 5mg/day responder was defined as a participant who had the following criteria at Week 36:
- reduction ≥4 points in SELENA-SLEDAI at week 36 compared with baseline, and
- no new BILAG A at week 36, and
- no more than 1 new BILAG B at week 36, and
- no deterioration in PGA (<10% worsening) on 100-mm VAS compared with baseline plus corticosteroids (CS) ≤5mg equivalent prednisolone per day at week 36
Measured: At Week 36
Number of Participants With Neutralizing Anti-IFN-alpha Antibodies at W36
Individual serum antibody neutralizing capacity against recombinant IFN-alpha2b was measured by reporter gene assay using Interferon Sensitive Response Element (ISRE) reporter.
Measured: At week 36
Number of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events
Number of participants who reported any treatment-related adverse events until month 9
Measured: 9 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Study start23 Sep 2015
- Primary completion15 Mar 2018
- Study completion4 Feb 2020
Why it stopped: Reorganization proceedings of the sponsor
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Systemic Lupus ErythematosusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 185 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Neovacs
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Frédéric Houssiau, MD, PhD, Study chair, Head of Rhumatology, UCL, Brussels, Belgium
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02665364
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IFN-K-002
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 17 Nov 2015
- Last updated
- 9 Apr 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Hannon CW, McCourt C, Lima HC, Chen S, Bennett C. Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 9;3(3):CD007478. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007478.pub2.
PubMed 33687069Houssiau FA, Thanou A, Mazur M, Ramiterre E, Gomez Mora DA, Misterska-Skora M, Perich-Campos RA, Smakotina SA, Cerpa Cruz S, Louzir B, Croughs T, Tee ML. IFN-alpha kinoid in systemic lupus erythematosus: results from a phase IIb, randomised, placebo-controlled study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Mar;79(3):347-355. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216379. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
PubMed 31871140
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Apr 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase IIb, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Neutralization of the Interferon Gene Signature and the Clinical Efficacy of IFNα-Kinoid in Adult Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02665364
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IFN-K-002
- Conditions
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Reorganization proceedings of the sponsor
- Enrolment
- 185 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- NeovacsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 23 Sep 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 4 Feb 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 26 Mar 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The safety and immunogenicity of the IFNα-Kinoid (IFN-K) have been evaluated in a phase I clinical study conducted in subjects with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Preliminary results showed acceptable safety profile and patients developped antibodies response.
The principal aim of the present study is to confirm the neutralization of the interferon gene signature and the clinical efficacy of IFN-K in subjects with SLE. In addition, the immune responses and the safety elicited by IFN-K will also be evaluated.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| IFNα-Kinoid | Experimental | Biological: IFNα-Kinoid, Other: ISA 51 VGIFNα-Kinoid (IFN-K) adjuvanted with ISA 51 VG via intramuscular injection. 1 administration of 240 μg at W0, W1, W4 and 1 administration of 120 μg at month 3 (W12) and month 6 (W24) in addition to standard of care treatment. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: Placebo, Other: ISA 51 VGPlacebo normal saline (0.9% Sodium Chloride) adjuvanted with ISA 51 VG via intramuscular injection. 1 administration of 240 μg at week (W)0, W1, W4 and 1 administration of 120 μg at month 3 (W12) and month 6 (W24) in addition to standard of care treatment. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Has had a diagnosis of SLE according to current American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria (4 of 11 ACR criteria)
- Has SLEDAI-2K ≥ 6
- Has at least 1 BILAG A and/or at least 2 BILAG B
- Has a positive IFN gene signature by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)
- Has anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) ≥ 1:160 and/or anti-dsDNA antibodies ≥ 7.0 IU/mL
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Has active, severe lupus nephritis as defined either by the immediate need for cyclophosphamide treatment or by renal BILAG A
- Has active, severe, neuropsychiatric SLE, defined as neuropsychiatric BILAG A
- Has been treated with corticosteroids (CS) at a dose of >20 mg of prednisone equivalent/day for > 7 consecutive days
- Is currently receiving or has received pulse dose CS (≥ 250 mg prednisone equivalent/day)
- Has received potent immunosuppressive drugs
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| IFNα-Kinoid | Biological | IFNα-Kinoid |
| Placebo | Other | Placebo |
| ISA 51 VG | Other | IFNα-Kinoid, Placebo |
Primary outcome
Percent Change From Baseline in IFN Gene Signature at W36
Time frame: Baseline and Last Available Value (LVA) between week 24 and week 36
The biological endpoint aimed at evaluating the neutralization of the IFN gene signature following treatment with IFN-K compared to placebo, as measured by the % change from baseline of the expression of IFN-induced genes.
Number of Participants Who Achieved a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) With Superimposed CS Tapering at Week 36
Time frame: At Week 36
British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) responder was defined as a subject who had the following criteria at week 36: * All BILAG A scores at baseline improve to B/C/D and all BILAG B scores improve to C/D at W36, and * No BILAG worsening in other body systems: no new BILAG A or ≥ 2 new BILAG B scores at W36, and * No worsening in SLEDAI-2K total score at W36 compared with baseline, and * No deterioration in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) (< 10% worsening) on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 100 mm at W36 compared with baseline, and * No addition or increased dose level of anti-malarial drugs or immunosuppressive drugs or CS* between W24 and W36 (*≤5 mg prednisolone or equivalent /day at W24 and no increase until W36).
10 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Systematic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index (SRI)-4 at Week 36
Time frame: W36 (9 months)
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) at Week 36
Time frame: At Week 36
BILAG Global Score Change From Baseline to Last Available Value (LVA) Between Week 24 and Week 36
Time frame: Last Available Value (LVA) between week 24 and week 36
SELENA-SLEDAI - Change From Baseline to Week 36
Time frame: Baseline and Week 36
SLICC/ACR-DI Change From Baseline at Week 36
Time frame: Baseline and Week 36
CLASI Total Activity Change From Baseline at Week 36
Time frame: Baseline and Week 36
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Composite SRI-4 Including CS ≤7,5mg/Day at Week 36
Time frame: At Week 36
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Composite SRI-4 Including CS ≤5mg/Day at Week 36
Time frame: At Week 36
Number of Participants With Neutralizing Anti-IFN-alpha Antibodies at W36
Time frame: At week 36
Number of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events
Time frame: 9 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Apr 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33687069Hannon CW, McCourt C, Lima HC, Chen S, Bennett C. Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 9;3(3):CD007478. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007478.pub2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31871140Houssiau FA, Thanou A, Mazur M, Ramiterre E, Gomez Mora DA, Misterska-Skora M, Perich-Campos RA, Smakotina SA, Cerpa Cruz S, Louzir B, Croughs T, Tee ML. IFN-alpha kinoid in systemic lupus erythematosus: results from a phase IIb, randomised, placebo-controlled study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Mar;79(3):347-355. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216379. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
Related trials for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingPhase 4
Dapagliflozin in Active Lupus Nephritis
Lupus Nephritis (LN)
RecruitingObservational study
Electroencephalogram Recording in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingObservational study
Deciphering the Genetic Architecture of Autoimmune Diseases
Autoimmune Diseases
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Frédéric Houssiau, MD, PhD study chair
Head of Rhumatology, UCL, Brussels, Belgium
101 sites in 21 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing IFNα-Kinoid and ISA 51 VG in people with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, run by Neovacs at 101 sites in 21 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 101 sites in United States, Russia, Mexico, Poland, Colombia and 16 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Mar 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percent Change From Baseline in IFN Gene Signature at W36 (time frame: Baseline and Last Available Value (LVA) between week 24 and week 36). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02665364, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Apr 2020.