Renal Transplantation Into a Defunctionalized BladderNCT02665572
Outcome of Renal Transplant on a Defunctionalized Bladder
A study testing bladder recycling in people with Renal Transplantation Into a Defunctionalized Bladder, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
In this study, investigators will prospectively evaluate the outcome of renal transplantation into a defunctionalized bladder by comparing direct transplantation into this defunctionalized bladder and pre-transplant programmed bladder cycling. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Renal Transplantation Into a Defunctionalized Bladder
- What is being tested?
- bladder recycling
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 32 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- Aug 2015to Oct 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patients maintained on hemodialysis for more than 12 months
- have oliguria or anuria
- reduced bladder capacity
- have no history of lower urinary tract dysfunction and have no evidence of urological cause of renal failure.
Who cannot join
- Patients with history of lower urinary tract symptoms before developing renal failure and
- those with lower urinary tract disease resulting in renal failure will be excluded
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Urology and Nephrology Center
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, 35516
Mohamed H Zahran, Dr, 0502202638, zahranmha@yahoo.com
About this study
Official title: Outcome of Renal Transplant on a Defunctionalized Bladder. A Randomized Controlled Trial
In this study, investigators will prospectively evaluate the outcome of renal transplantation into a defunctionalized bladder by comparing direct transplantation into this defunctionalized bladder and pre-transplant programmed bladder cycling.
Read the detailed description
Study population:
The study will include patients maintained on hemodialysis for more than 12 months, have oliguria or anuria, reduced bladder capacity, have no history of lower urinary tract dysfunction and have no evidence of urological cause of renal failure. Patients with history of lower urinary tract symptoms before developing renal failure and those with lower urinary tract disease resulting in renal failure will be excluded.
Study design:
It is a randomized controlled trial comparing the outcome of programmed bladder cycling before the time of renal transplantation and direct transplantation without bladder cycling in patients with defunctionalized bladder. Patients, who meet the inclusion criteria, will be randomly allocated into two groups. The first group will undergo renal transplantation on the defunctionalized bladder without bladder recycling. The second group will undergo renal transplantation after bladder recycling.
Measurements:
All patients will be diagnosed by proper history taking, cystoscopy, ascending cystogram and cystometry in order to confirm the diagnosis of reduced bladder capacity and exclude any organic or neurological cause. Bladder recycling will be done by the patient after proper education. It will be started by the instillation of the sterile water in the bladder in amount equal to the estimated bladder capacity. Then the amount will be gradually increased till the patient can withstand filling the bladder with 300 cc of sterile water for 2 hours. Any associated complications will be reported and the time needed to reach the due bladder capacity will be recorded. The procedure of renal transplantation will be carried out according to the hospital protocol and the ureteroneocystostomy will be done by a non-stented Leich Gregoir technique.
Assuming that the bladder will regain its activity and full capacity after 8 weeks of transplantation, all patients will be assessed 3 months after transplantation by the following:
- IPSS questionnaire in order to evaluate the lower urinary tract symptoms.
- Ascending cystogram.
- Cystometry.
- Graft function.
Outcome:
The primary outcome is to evaluate whether bladder recycling is efficient to restore bladder function prior to renal transplantation in terms of IPSS score, and urodynamic evaluation. The secondary outcome is to evaluate the differences in graft and patients outcome between groups.
Power calculation and Statistical analysis:
We hypothesized that at 3 months postoperatively; recipients without bladder training will be non-inferior to those underwent bladder training in terms of cystometric capacity. Based on this, to achieve a difference in mean cystometric capacity of 50 cc in favor of bladder training patients, 16 patients in each group are required to achieve a power of 80% and an α error of 0.05. Statistical power is determined using medcalc version 12.5.0.0 software and all statistical analyses will be performed using IBM version 20 statistical software.
- Being tested
- bladder recycling
- Keywords
- renal transplantation, defunctionalized bladder, bladder recycling
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
bladder recyclingBehavioural
Bladder recycling will be done by the patient after proper education. It will be started by the instillation of the sterile water in the bladder in amount equal to the estimated bladder capacity. Then the amount will be gradually increased till the patient can withstand filling the bladder with 300 cc of sterile water for 2 hours.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| renal transplant without bladder recycling | No intervention | the patients allocated to this arm and met inclusion criteria will undergo renal transplant without prior recycling of the bladder |
| renal transplantation with bladder recycling | Active comparator | the patients allocated in this arm will undergo bladder recycling prior to renal transplantation Receives: Behavioral: bladder recycling |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
improvement of bladder function after recycling
to evaluate whether bladder recycling is efficient to restore bladder function prior to renal transplantation by urodynamic evaluation and ascending cystogram to measure the bladder capacity in cm
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
voiding function after renal transplantation
- IPSS questionnaire in order to evaluate the lower urinary tract symptoms score ( score range from 0-35)
- Ascending cystogram.( capacity in cm, presence of reflux, postvoiding residual urine)
- Cystometry ( capacity in cm)
Measured: 3 months after renal transplantation
graft function
creatinine clearance and estimated GFR by renography ( ml/min/1.73 m2)
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2015
- Primary completionAug 2021 (estimated)
- Study completionOct 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Renal Transplantation Into a Defunctionalized BladderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Mansoura UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mansoura University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mohamed Hassan Zahran, Mansoura University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02665572
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Zahran MH3182015
- Status last verified
- Feb 2021
- First submitted
- 29 Oct 2015
- Last updated
- 25 Feb 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Feb 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Outcome of Renal Transplant on a Defunctionalized Bladder. A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02665572
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Zahran MH3182015
- Keywords
- renal transplantation, defunctionalized bladder, bladder recycling
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Mansoura UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2015
- Primary completion
- Aug 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Oct 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In this study, investigators will prospectively evaluate the outcome of renal transplantation into a defunctionalized bladder by comparing direct transplantation into this defunctionalized bladder and pre-transplant programmed bladder cycling.
Detailed description
Study population:
The study will include patients maintained on hemodialysis for more than 12 months, have oliguria or anuria, reduced bladder capacity, have no history of lower urinary tract dysfunction and have no evidence of urological cause of renal failure. Patients with history of lower urinary tract symptoms before developing renal failure and those with lower urinary tract disease resulting in renal failure will be excluded.
Study design:
It is a randomized controlled trial comparing the outcome of programmed bladder cycling before the time of renal transplantation and direct transplantation without bladder cycling in patients with defunctionalized bladder. Patients, who meet the inclusion criteria, will be randomly allocated into two groups. The first group will undergo renal transplantation on the defunctionalized bladder without bladder recycling. The second group will undergo renal transplantation after bladder recycling.
Measurements:
All patients will be diagnosed by proper history taking, cystoscopy, ascending cystogram and cystometry in order to confirm the diagnosis of reduced bladder capacity and exclude any organic or neurological cause. Bladder recycling will be done by the patient after proper education. It will be started by the instillation of the sterile water in the bladder in amount equal to the estimated bladder capacity. Then the amount will be gradually increased till the patient can withstand filling the bladder with 300 cc of sterile water for 2 hours. Any associated complications will be reported and the time needed to reach the due bladder capacity will be recorded. The procedure of renal transplantation will be carried out according to the hospital protocol and the ureteroneocystostomy will be done by a non-stented Leich Gregoir technique.
Assuming that the bladder will regain its activity and full capacity after 8 weeks of transplantation, all patients will be assessed 3 months after transplantation by the following:
- IPSS questionnaire in order to evaluate the lower urinary tract symptoms.
- Ascending cystogram.
- Cystometry.
- Graft function.
Outcome:
The primary outcome is to evaluate whether bladder recycling is efficient to restore bladder function prior to renal transplantation in terms of IPSS score, and urodynamic evaluation. The secondary outcome is to evaluate the differences in graft and patients outcome between groups.
Power calculation and Statistical analysis:
We hypothesized that at 3 months postoperatively; recipients without bladder training will be non-inferior to those underwent bladder training in terms of cystometric capacity. Based on this, to achieve a difference in mean cystometric capacity of 50 cc in favor of bladder training patients, 16 patients in each group are required to achieve a power of 80% and an α error of 0.05. Statistical power is determined using medcalc version 12.5.0.0 software and all statistical analyses will be performed using IBM version 20 statistical software.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| renal transplant without bladder recycling | No intervention | –the patients allocated to this arm and met inclusion criteria will undergo renal transplant without prior recycling of the bladder |
| renal transplantation with bladder recycling | Active comparator | Behavioral: bladder recyclingthe patients allocated in this arm will undergo bladder recycling prior to renal transplantation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- patients maintained on hemodialysis for more than 12 months
- have oliguria or anuria
- reduced bladder capacity
- have no history of lower urinary tract dysfunction and have no evidence of urological cause of renal failure.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients with history of lower urinary tract symptoms before developing renal failure and
- those with lower urinary tract disease resulting in renal failure will be excluded
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| bladder recyclingBladder recycling will be done by the patient after proper education. It will be started by the instillation of the sterile water in the bladder in amount equal to the estimated bladder capacity. Then the amount will be gradually increased till the patient can withstand filling the bladder with 300 cc of sterile water for 2 hours. | Behavioural | renal transplantation with bladder recycling |
Primary outcome
improvement of bladder function after recycling
Time frame: 3 months
to evaluate whether bladder recycling is efficient to restore bladder function prior to renal transplantation by urodynamic evaluation and ascending cystogram to measure the bladder capacity in cm
2 secondary outcomes
voiding function after renal transplantation
Time frame: 3 months after renal transplantation
graft function
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Feb 2021.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing bladder recycling in people with Renal Transplantation Into a Defunctionalized Bladder, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Mohamed H Zahran, Dr (0502202638, zahranmha@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
improvement of bladder function after recycling (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Feb 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.