StrokePhase 1NCT02667392
Biofeedback to Increase Propulsion During Walking After Stroke
A Phase 1 study testing Gait Training with Biofeedback and Gait Training with Verbal Feedback in people with Stroke, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Approximately 15,000 Veterans are hospitalized for stroke each year with new cases costing an estimated $111 million for acute inpatient, $75 million for post-acute inpatient, and $88 million for follow-up care over 6 months post-stroke. Rehabilitation of walking ability contributes to these costs. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Gait Training with Biofeedback and Gait Training with Verbal Feedback
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 11 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 2 Oct 2017to 30 Sep 2019
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of stroke
- > 6 months < 5 years post-stroke onset
- Medically stable
- 18-80 years of age
- Impaired lower extremity sensation confirmed by a score of < 12 on the Fugl-Meyer Sensory Assessment,20
- Community-dwelling
Show all 12Show fewer
- Step length asymmetry (paretic step length > non-paretic step length)
- this asymmetry has been determined to be correlated with minimal propulsive force of the paretic leg4
- Unilateral lower extremity paresis confirmed by a score of < 32 on the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment,20
- Able to ambulate without an orthotic device
- Able to ambulate without an assistive device
- Ambulation of household distances without physical assistance to advance or support paretic lower extremity
Who cannot join
- Presence of a neurological condition other than stroke
- Pain upon ambulation
- Receiving physical therapy services for mobility and/or gait
- Severe arthritis or orthopedic problems that limit passive ranges of motion
- knee flexion contracture of -10 , knee flexion range of motion (ROM) < 90
- hip flexion contracture > 25
- ankle plantar flexion contracture > 15
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, FL
Gainesville, Florida, 32608
About this study
Approximately 15,000 Veterans are hospitalized for stroke each year with new cases costing an estimated $111 million for acute inpatient, $75 million for post-acute inpatient, and $88 million for follow-up care over 6 months post-stroke. Rehabilitation of walking ability contributes to these costs. To "walk again" is the number one stated goal for Veterans who have had a stroke. Teaching patients post-stroke to use their weak leg while they are regaining walking function and to not compensate by over-using their strong leg is necessary to restore safe, efficient walking ability. This project will determine if providing biofeedback (an audible tone) from pressure-sensitive shoe insole sensors, that encourage use of the weaker leg during walking training, in addition to therapists' feedback, will help Veterans regain use of their weak leg, improve their endurance and improve their balance when walking in challenging environments.
Read the detailed description
Background/Purpose: Approximately 15,000 Veterans are hospitalized for stroke each year. Impairments of motor control and the subsequent functional limitations in ambulation are the most common manifestations and regaining the ability to walk is the number one stated goal of Veteran stroke survivors. Forward propulsion of the body's center of mass is a cardinal feature of gait that depends on the generation of appropriate anterior-posterior ground reaction forces. Decreased propulsive force generation by the paretic limb of stroke survivors has been identified through both simulation and cross-sectional studies as a major contributor to walking dysfunction. Extrinsic verbal feedback from a therapist is the standard approach used during gait retraining to improve propulsion generation. However, this key component of gait is not directly observable by therapists and patients are often unable to sense propulsion generation due to impaired intrinsic feedback, specifically deficits in somatosensation and proprioception, hindering recovery of paretic propulsion and compromising walking function. The objective of this study is to provide preliminary evidence that biofeedback as an adjuvant to therapists' verbal feedback will improve propulsion and enhance walking function for Veterans post-stroke.
Subjects: Thirty individuals > 6-months post-stroke will participate. Additional study criteria include: 1) Ambulation of household distances without physical assistance to advance or support the paretic leg; 2) Unilateral leg paresis confirmed by a score of < 32 on the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment; 3) Step length asymmetry (paretic > non-paretic step length); 4) Ambulation without an assistive or orthotic device.
Methods: Participants will be randomized to either an experimental group that will train with propulsion biofeedback from commercially available pressure-sensitive insole sensors (Biofeedback group; n=15) or a control group that will train with standard therapist-provided verbal feedback alone (Standard group; n=15). The 12 session (3X/week for 4 weeks) gait training intervention will be delivered by a physical therapist-led team. For participants in the Biofeedback group, prior to the first intervention session, the baseline amount of pressure exerted by the paretic forefoot during late stance will be determined. The insole area underlying the forefoot will then be calibrated to produce a tone when pressure exceeds 5% of this baseline pressure. This threshold will be progressively increased at regular intervals throughout the intervention period to ensure participants are training at their challenge-point to improve propulsion of the paretic limb. An insole of similar thickness will be worn in the shoe of the non-paretic leg for symmetry and comfort but will not produce a tone during the intervention. Those in the Standard group will not wear insoles during intervention but will receive verbal feedback alone regarding propulsion of the paretic limb during gait training. Therapist-provided verbal feedback will be used to instruct participants on achieving and/or maintaining appropriate movement patterns that contribute to propulsion generation. For both groups, the therapist will choose from a standardized bank of gait activities, suitable to each participant's ability level. The goal for total walking time for each session will be 50 minutes: 5, 10-minute bouts with a 2-minute rest between each bout.
Outcome Measures: Paretic limb propulsion is the primary outcome measure. Secondary measures include the Six Minute Walk Test, Functional Gait Assessment, Fall Self-Efficacy, temporal-distance gait measures and gait kinematics, all of which will be measured pre- and post-intervention.
Data Analysis Plan: Descriptive statistics will be provided for all outcome measures. To identify the effect of the intervention, differences between the pre- and post-training assessment within each group (i.e. change scores) will be calculated. To test the hypotheses, the investigators will apply independent sample t-tests to the change scores of the Biofeedback and Standard group. Hypothesis testing will be conducted at a two-sided p < 0.05 level.
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Being tested
- Gait Training with Biofeedback, Gait Training with Verbal Feedback
- Keywords
- Stroke, Gait, Walking, Rehabilitation, Exercise, Exercise Therapy, Physical Therapy Modalities, Exercise Movement Techniques
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Gait Training with BiofeedbackProcedure or surgery
Intervention (12, 60-minute sessions, 3X/week for four weeks) will occur in an outpatient research setting. Participants will be supervised by a licensed physical therapist and wear a gait belt during all activities. The therapist will choose from a standardized bank of gait activities, suitable to each participant's ability level. The goal for total walking time for each session will be 50 minutes: 5, 10-minute bouts with a 2-minute rest between bouts. This is the typical length and intensity of outpatient rehabilitation sessions for ambulatory patients discharged from inpatient rehabilitation.
Biofeedback Group: Biofeedback (external-focus feedback) will be provided as an adjuvant to therapist-provided feedback during the intervention. Participants will be instructed that a tone will sound when they "push off with their (paretic) leg to swing it forward" when the participant-specific pre-programmed threshold is exceeded.
Gait Training with Verbal FeedbackProcedure or surgery
Intervention (12, 60-minute sessions, 3X/week for four weeks) will occur in an outpatient research setting. Participants will be supervised by a licensed physical therapist and wear a gait belt during all activities. The therapist will choose from a standardized bank of gait activities, suitable to each participant's ability level. The goal for total walking time for each session will be 50 minutes: 5, 10-minute bouts with a 2-minute rest between bouts. This is the typical length and intensity of outpatient rehabilitation sessions for ambulatory patients discharged from inpatient rehabilitation.
Verbal Feedback Group: Therapist-provided internal-focus feedback ("directed towards components of body movement") will be used to instruct participants on achieving and/or maintaining appropriate movement patterns that contribute to propulsion generation.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Biofeedback Group | Experimental | Participants will wear a pressure-sensitive insole inside the shoe of their paretic limb. An auditory tone will sound when participants have provided sufficient load to active the pressure-sensitive in-sole. Receives: Procedure: Gait Training with Biofeedback |
| Verbal Feedback Group | Active comparator | Participants will receive verbal feedback from a physical therapist regarding the amount of loading they are exerting on their paretic limb. Receives: Procedure: Gait Training with Verbal Feedback |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Forward Propulsion of the Paretic Limb From Pre- to Post-intervention
The propulsive impulse will be derived from the time integral of the positive anterior-posterior ground reaction force for the paretic leg normalized to Body Weight.
Measured: Pre-intervention (prior to 1st intervention session) and Post-intervention (after the final (12th intervention session), approximately 4 weeks after entering the study.
Secondary outcomes (10)
Change From Baseline in Peak Hip Flexion Range of Motion, in Degrees, of the Paretic Leg From Pre- to Post-intervention
Hip motion data will be acquired using a modified Helen Hayes marker set with rigid clusters on the pelvis and each thigh and reflective markers at the greater trochanter and the lateral condyle of the femur. The angle formed between the rigid cluster on the pelvis and the lateral condyle of the femur will be recorded at 100 Hz using a 12 camera motion capture system. The peak value from 10 gait cycles was averaged to obtain an average peak value.
Measured: Pre-intervention (prior to 1st intervention session) and Post-intervention (after the final (12th intervention session), approximately 4 weeks after entering the study.
Change From Baseline in Stride Time From Pre to Post-intervention.
Data will be acquired while walking across a GAITRite instrumented walkway.
Measured: Pre-intervention (prior to 1st intervention session) and Post-intervention (after the final (12th intervention session), approximately 4 weeks after entering the study.
Change From Baseline in Distance Covered During the Six Minute Walk Test From Pre- to Post-intervention
Participants will walk for a total of six minutes at their comfortable walking speed and the total distance will be recorded.
Measured: Pre-intervention (prior to 1st intervention session) and Post-intervention (after the final (12th intervention session), approximately 4 weeks after entering the study.
Change From Baseline in the Functional Gait Assessment Score From Pre- to Post-intervention
Ten item gait and balance test during which participants walk forwards, backwards, ascend/descend stairs, walk with head turning and step over obstacles. Score ranges from 0-30 with a larger number indicative of a better outcome. Each item is scored on a 0-4 scale with a lower number representing greater impairment. The individual score on each of the ten items are summed for a total score with a larger number indicative of a better outcome.
Measured: Pre-intervention (prior to 1st intervention session) and Post-intervention (after the final (12th intervention session), approximately 4 weeks after entering the study.
Change From Baseline in the Modified Falls Efficacy Scale From Pre- to Post-intervention
Fourteen item questionnaire designed to measure self-perceived fear of falling during task performance. Score range is between 0-10 with a higher score indicative of a better outcome
Measured: Pre-intervention (prior to 1st intervention session) and Post-intervention (after the final (12th intervention session), approximately 4 weeks after entering the study.
Change From Baseline in Paretic Limb Step Time From Pre- to Post-intervention.
Footfall of both limbs will be acquired while participants walk across a pressure sensitive instrumented walkway (GAITRite). From these footballs paretic step time will be calculated.
Measured: Pre-intervention (prior to 1st intervention session) and Post-intervention (after the final (12th intervention session), approximately 4 weeks after entering the study.
Change From Baseline in Paretic Limb Stride Length From Pre to Post-intervention.
Footfalls from both limbs will be acquired as participant walks across a pressure-sensitive instrumented walkway (GAITRite). From these footfalls will be used to calculate paretic limb stride length.
Measured: Pre-intervention (prior to 1st intervention session) and Post-intervention (after the final (12th intervention session), approximately 4 weeks after entering the study.
Change From Baseline in Paretic Limb Step Length From Pre to Post-intervention.
Footfalls from both limbs will be acquired as participant walks across a pressure-sensitive instrumented walkway (GAITRite). From these footfalls will be used to calculate paretic limb step length.
Measured: Pre-intervention (prior to 1st intervention session) and Post-intervention (after the final (12th intervention session), approximately 4 weeks after entering the study.
Change From Baseline in Paretic Limb Step Width From Pre to Post-intervention.
Footfalls from both limbs will be acquired as participant walks across a pressure-sensitive instrumented walkway (GAITRite). From these footfalls will be used to calculate paretic limb step width.
Measured: Pre-intervention (prior to 1st intervention session) and Post-intervention (after the final (12th intervention session), approximately 4 weeks after entering the study.
Change From Baseline in Gait Speed From Pre to Post-intervention.
Data will be acquired while participants walk across a pressure-sensitive 14 meter instrumented walkway (Brand Name: GAITRite).
Measured: Pre-intervention (prior to 1st intervention session) and Post-intervention (after the final (12th intervention session), approximately 4 weeks after entering the study.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Study start2 Oct 2017
- Primary completion16 Sep 2019
- Study completion30 Sep 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by VA Office of Research and DevelopmentThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Parallel: participants are assigned to one of two or more groups in parallel for the duration of the study.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 11 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- VA Office of Research and Development
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Dorian Kay Rose, PhD MS BS, Principal investigator, North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, FL
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02667392
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- N2051-P
- Status last verified
- Feb 2021
- First submitted
- 19 Jan 2016
- Last updated
- 21 Feb 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Feb 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Biofeedback to Increase Propulsion During Walking After Stroke
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02667392
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- N2051-P
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Keywords
- Stroke, Gait, Walking, Rehabilitation, Exercise, Exercise Therapy, Physical Therapy Modalities, Exercise Movement Techniques
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 11 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- VA Office of Research and DevelopmentUS federal agency
- Study start
- 2 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 21 Feb 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Approximately 15,000 Veterans are hospitalized for stroke each year with new cases costing an estimated $111 million for acute inpatient, $75 million for post-acute inpatient, and $88 million for follow-up care over 6 months post-stroke. Rehabilitation of walking ability contributes to these costs. To "walk again" is the number one stated goal for Veterans who have had a stroke. Teaching patients post-stroke to use their weak leg while they are regaining walking function and to not compensate by over-using their strong leg is necessary to restore safe, efficient walking ability. This project will determine if providing biofeedback (an audible tone) from pressure-sensitive shoe insole sensors, that encourage use of the weaker leg during walking training, in addition to therapists' feedback, will help Veterans regain use of their weak leg, improve their endurance and improve their balance when walking in challenging environments.
Detailed description
Background/Purpose: Approximately 15,000 Veterans are hospitalized for stroke each year. Impairments of motor control and the subsequent functional limitations in ambulation are the most common manifestations and regaining the ability to walk is the number one stated goal of Veteran stroke survivors. Forward propulsion of the body's center of mass is a cardinal feature of gait that depends on the generation of appropriate anterior-posterior ground reaction forces. Decreased propulsive force generation by the paretic limb of stroke survivors has been identified through both simulation and cross-sectional studies as a major contributor to walking dysfunction. Extrinsic verbal feedback from a therapist is the standard approach used during gait retraining to improve propulsion generation. However, this key component of gait is not directly observable by therapists and patients are often unable to sense propulsion generation due to impaired intrinsic feedback, specifically deficits in somatosensation and proprioception, hindering recovery of paretic propulsion and compromising walking function. The objective of this study is to provide preliminary evidence that biofeedback as an adjuvant to therapists' verbal feedback will improve propulsion and enhance walking function for Veterans post-stroke.
Subjects: Thirty individuals > 6-months post-stroke will participate. Additional study criteria include: 1) Ambulation of household distances without physical assistance to advance or support the paretic leg; 2) Unilateral leg paresis confirmed by a score of < 32 on the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment; 3) Step length asymmetry (paretic > non-paretic step length); 4) Ambulation without an assistive or orthotic device.
Methods: Participants will be randomized to either an experimental group that will train with propulsion biofeedback from commercially available pressure-sensitive insole sensors (Biofeedback group; n=15) or a control group that will train with standard therapist-provided verbal feedback alone (Standard group; n=15). The 12 session (3X/week for 4 weeks) gait training intervention will be delivered by a physical therapist-led team. For participants in the Biofeedback group, prior to the first intervention session, the baseline amount of pressure exerted by the paretic forefoot during late stance will be determined. The insole area underlying the forefoot will then be calibrated to produce a tone when pressure exceeds 5% of this baseline pressure. This threshold will be progressively increased at regular intervals throughout the intervention period to ensure participants are training at their challenge-point to improve propulsion of the paretic limb. An insole of similar thickness will be worn in the shoe of the non-paretic leg for symmetry and comfort but will not produce a tone during the intervention. Those in the Standard group will not wear insoles during intervention but will receive verbal feedback alone regarding propulsion of the paretic limb during gait training. Therapist-provided verbal feedback will be used to instruct participants on achieving and/or maintaining appropriate movement patterns that contribute to propulsion generation. For both groups, the therapist will choose from a standardized bank of gait activities, suitable to each participant's ability level. The goal for total walking time for each session will be 50 minutes: 5, 10-minute bouts with a 2-minute rest between each bout.
Outcome Measures: Paretic limb propulsion is the primary outcome measure. Secondary measures include the Six Minute Walk Test, Functional Gait Assessment, Fall Self-Efficacy, temporal-distance gait measures and gait kinematics, all of which will be measured pre- and post-intervention.
Data Analysis Plan: Descriptive statistics will be provided for all outcome measures. To identify the effect of the intervention, differences between the pre- and post-training assessment within each group (i.e. change scores) will be calculated. To test the hypotheses, the investigators will apply independent sample t-tests to the change scores of the Biofeedback and Standard group. Hypothesis testing will be conducted at a two-sided p < 0.05 level.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Parallel: participants are assigned to one of two or more groups in parallel for the duration of the study.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Biofeedback Group | Experimental | Procedure: Gait Training with BiofeedbackParticipants will wear a pressure-sensitive insole inside the shoe of their paretic limb. An auditory tone will sound when participants have provided sufficient load to active the pressure-sensitive in-sole. |
| Verbal Feedback Group | Active comparator | Procedure: Gait Training with Verbal FeedbackParticipants will receive verbal feedback from a physical therapist regarding the amount of loading they are exerting on their paretic limb. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Diagnosis of stroke
- > 6 months < 5 years post-stroke onset
- Medically stable
- 18-80 years of age
- Impaired lower extremity sensation confirmed by a score of < 12 on the Fugl-Meyer Sensory Assessment,20
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Presence of a neurological condition other than stroke
- Pain upon ambulation
- Receiving physical therapy services for mobility and/or gait
- Severe arthritis or orthopedic problems that limit passive ranges of motion
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Gait Training with BiofeedbackIntervention (12, 60-minute sessions, 3X/week for four weeks) will occur in an outpatient research setting. Participants will be supervised by a licensed physical therapist and wear a gait belt during all activities. The therapist will choose from a standardized bank of gait activities, suitable to each participant's ability level. The goal for total walking time for each session will be 50 minutes: 5, 10-minute bouts with a 2-minute rest between bouts. This is the typical length and intensity of outpatient rehabilitation sessions for ambulatory patients discharged from inpatient rehabilitation. Biofeedback Group: Biofeedback (external-focus feedback) will be provided as an adjuvant to therapist-provided feedback during the intervention. Participants will be instructed that a tone will sound when they "push off with their (paretic) leg to swing it forward" when the participant-specific pre-programmed threshold is exceeded. | Procedure or surgery | Biofeedback Group |
| Gait Training with Verbal FeedbackIntervention (12, 60-minute sessions, 3X/week for four weeks) will occur in an outpatient research setting. Participants will be supervised by a licensed physical therapist and wear a gait belt during all activities. The therapist will choose from a standardized bank of gait activities, suitable to each participant's ability level. The goal for total walking time for each session will be 50 minutes: 5, 10-minute bouts with a 2-minute rest between bouts. This is the typical length and intensity of outpatient rehabilitation sessions for ambulatory patients discharged from inpatient rehabilitation. Verbal Feedback Group: Therapist-provided internal-focus feedback ("directed towards components of body movement") will be used to instruct participants on achieving and/or maintaining appropriate movement patterns that contribute to propulsion generation. | Procedure or surgery | Verbal Feedback Group |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Forward Propulsion of the Paretic Limb From Pre- to Post-intervention
Time frame: Pre-intervention (prior to 1st intervention session) and Post-intervention (after the final (12th intervention session), approximately 4 weeks after entering the study.
The propulsive impulse will be derived from the time integral of the positive anterior-posterior ground reaction force for the paretic leg normalized to Body Weight.
10 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Peak Hip Flexion Range of Motion, in Degrees, of the Paretic Leg From Pre- to Post-intervention
Time frame: Pre-intervention (prior to 1st intervention session) and Post-intervention (after the final (12th intervention session), approximately 4 weeks after entering the study.
Change From Baseline in Stride Time From Pre to Post-intervention.
Time frame: Pre-intervention (prior to 1st intervention session) and Post-intervention (after the final (12th intervention session), approximately 4 weeks after entering the study.
Change From Baseline in Distance Covered During the Six Minute Walk Test From Pre- to Post-intervention
Time frame: Pre-intervention (prior to 1st intervention session) and Post-intervention (after the final (12th intervention session), approximately 4 weeks after entering the study.
Change From Baseline in the Functional Gait Assessment Score From Pre- to Post-intervention
Time frame: Pre-intervention (prior to 1st intervention session) and Post-intervention (after the final (12th intervention session), approximately 4 weeks after entering the study.
Change From Baseline in the Modified Falls Efficacy Scale From Pre- to Post-intervention
Time frame: Pre-intervention (prior to 1st intervention session) and Post-intervention (after the final (12th intervention session), approximately 4 weeks after entering the study.
Change From Baseline in Paretic Limb Step Time From Pre- to Post-intervention.
Time frame: Pre-intervention (prior to 1st intervention session) and Post-intervention (after the final (12th intervention session), approximately 4 weeks after entering the study.
Change From Baseline in Paretic Limb Stride Length From Pre to Post-intervention.
Time frame: Pre-intervention (prior to 1st intervention session) and Post-intervention (after the final (12th intervention session), approximately 4 weeks after entering the study.
Change From Baseline in Paretic Limb Step Length From Pre to Post-intervention.
Time frame: Pre-intervention (prior to 1st intervention session) and Post-intervention (after the final (12th intervention session), approximately 4 weeks after entering the study.
Change From Baseline in Paretic Limb Step Width From Pre to Post-intervention.
Time frame: Pre-intervention (prior to 1st intervention session) and Post-intervention (after the final (12th intervention session), approximately 4 weeks after entering the study.
Change From Baseline in Gait Speed From Pre to Post-intervention.
Time frame: Pre-intervention (prior to 1st intervention session) and Post-intervention (after the final (12th intervention session), approximately 4 weeks after entering the study.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Feb 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History of Stroke: Cause and Development
Brain Disease, Ischemic Attack, Transient
RecruitingPhase 4
Xeomin® and Gait Related Mobility After Stroke
Stroke
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Comparison of Anti-coagulation and Anti-Platelet Therapies for Intracranial Vascular Atherostenosis
Intracranial Arteriosclerosis, Stroke
Recruiting
Impact of Atrial Fibrosis Surface Area on the Occurrence of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Ischemic Stroke of Undetermined Origin: a Prospective Cardiac MRI Pilot Study.
Stroke, Implantation of an Implantable Cardiac Monitor
Recruiting
Feasibility of the BrainGate2 Neural Interface System in Persons With Tetraplegia (BG-Tablet-01)
Brainstem Stroke, ALS
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dorian Kay Rose, PhD MS BS principal investigator
North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, FL
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Gait Training with Biofeedback and Gait Training with Verbal Feedback in people with Stroke, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Feb 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Forward Propulsion of the Paretic Limb From Pre- to Post-intervention (time frame: Pre-intervention (prior to 1st intervention session) and Post-intervention (after the final (12th intervention session), approximately 4 weeks after entering the study.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Feb 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.