AzTrials
AzTrials

Brain TumorsPhase 4NCT02670161

Quality Improvement and Practice Based Research in Neurology Using the EMR

A Phase 4 study testing Listed for each disorder below, up to three drugs per disorder (too many characters to list in this field; see Intervention Description) in people with Brain Tumors and Epilepsy, run by Endeavor Health at 1 site in United States.

Enrolling by invitation

Enrolling by invitation. The study team selects and invites participants, usually from an existing group of patients.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators will conduct at NorthShore University HealthSystem pragmatic trials using the EMR for 10 common neurological disorders. They will demonstrate the feasibility of subgroup based adaptive assignment of treatments, electronic consenting, and outcomes data capture at the point of care using the EMR. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
Brain Tumors, Epilepsy, Migraine
What is being tested?
Listed for each disorder below, up to three drugs per disorder (too many characters to list in this field; see Intervention Description)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
3,300 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
May 2016to Dec 2027
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of brain tumors, epilepsy, migraine, mild cognitive impairment (concussion), mild traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, neuropathy, Parkinson's disease, restless legs syndrome, and stroke.
  • Eligible to receive any of the three compared treatments according to FDA approval for the indication or off label use according to standard of care.

Who cannot join

  • -- None

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States1 site
  • NorthShore University HealthSystem

    Evanston, Illinois, 60201

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Quality Improvement and Practice Based Research in Neurology Using the Electronic Medical Record

The investigators will conduct at NorthShore University HealthSystem pragmatic trials using the EMR for 10 common neurological disorders. They will demonstrate the feasibility of subgroup based adaptive assignment of treatments, electronic consenting, and outcomes data capture at the point of care using the EMR. They will identify the most effective treatments for common neurological disorders and seek replication by the NPBRN.

Read the detailed description

The goals of the proposed research are to advance quality improvement and practice based research in Neurology using the electronic medical record (EMR). The American Academy of Neurology (AAN) has published evidence-based guidelines, quality improvement measures, and resources for several neurological disorders. However, the AAN guidelines and measures have not been implemented routinely and benchmark data are lacking. There are few EMR tools available to standardize neurology office visits according to Best Practices, to provide alerts when neurological care is deviating from AAN guidelines, to capture data regarding adherence to AAN or other quality parameters, to measure the effects of compliance with guidelines on outcomes, or to share longitudinal data and to compare effectiveness of care across neurological practices. The Department of Neurology at NorthShore University HealthSystem (NorthShore) has built into its commercial EMR "Epic" structured clinical documentation support (SCDS) and clinical decision support (CDS) tools that standardize care, write progress notes, and capture up to 1,000 discrete and cascading fields of neurological data per office visit. However, these EMR tools have not been disseminated for use by other Neurology practices or for data sharing, and presently do not support clinical trials. Pragmatic trials using EMRs would enable comparisons of treatments at the point of care. To address gaps in quality improvement and practice based research in Neurology, the investigators are proposing to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) a project with the specific aims: 1) To create a Neurology Practice Based Research Network (NPBRN). The NorthShore site will share SCDS and CDS tools for 10 common neurological disorders (brain tumors, epilepsy, migraine, mild cognitive impairment, mild traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, neuropathy, Parkinson's disease, restless legs syndrome, and stroke) with seven other Department of Neurology that also use the Epic EMR platform (eight sites total). 2) To conduct at NorthShore pragmatic trials using the EMR for 10 common neurological disorders. The investigators will demonstrate the feasibility of subgroup based adaptive assignment of treatments, electronic consenting, and outcomes data capture at the point of care using the EMR. They will identify the most effective treatments for common neurological disorders and seek replication by the NPBRN. The aims are innovative because the investigators will use the EMR to hardwire quality and outcomes research in Neurology. They will individualize medicine at the point of care by conducting pragmatic trials using subgroup based adaptive designs, comparing the effectiveness of available treatments for common neurological disorders. The aims are significant because they are studying several neurological disorders, a leading cause of healthcare burden worldwide. They will create a national practice based network to improve health care quality by accelerating implementation of patient-centered outcomes research in Neurology using the EMR, and evidence to make health care safer and to improve health care efficiency. NOTE: This ClinicalTrials.gov registration relates to Aim 2 of the project (pragmatic trials using the EMR). Aim 1 is an observational study only (quality improvement, comparative effectiveness research).

Being tested
Listed for each disorder below, up to three drugs per disorder (too many characters to list in this field; see Intervention Description)
Medical subject headings
Brain Neoplasms, Epilepsy, Migraine Disorders, Cognitive Dysfunction, Brain Concussion, Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson Disease, Restless Legs Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Listed for each disorder below, up to three drugs per disorder (too many characters to list in this field; see Intervention Description)Drug

    Also called (too many characters to list in this field; see Intervention Description)

    brain tumors (lamotrigine, levetiracetam, valproic acid), epilepsy (lamotrigine, levetiracetam, valproic acid), mild cognitive impairment (donepezil, rivastigmine, memantine), migraine (amitriptyline, propranolol, topiramate), migraine (sumatriptan, rizatriptan, zolmitriptan), mild traumatic brain injury (omega-3 fatty acids, education only), multiple sclerosis (ACTH, methylprednisolone), neuropathy (duloxetine, pregabalin, amitryptiline), Parkinson's disease (pramipexole, ropinerole, rotigotine), restless legs syndrome (pramipexole, ropinerole, rotigotine), stroke (aspirin, clopidogrel).

Study groups in NCT02670161
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Treatment A (see interventions description)Active comparatorThe investigators will conduct 11 pragmatic trials using the EMR: brain tumors (prevent seizures), epilepsy (prevent other seizure types), mild cognitive impairment (improve memory), migraine (prevention), migraine (abortive), mild traumatic brain injury (prevent post concussion syndrome), multiple sclerosis (attenuate relapses), neuropathy (pain management), Parkinson's (treat motor symptoms), restless legs syndrome (treat sensory symptoms), stroke (secondary prevention). For each trial they will compare up to three medications or treatments either FDA approved for the indication, or commonly employed. The pragmatic trials will be small and primarily to demonstrate the feasibility of subgroup based adaptive assignment of treatments, electronic consenting, and data capture at the point of care using the EMR. The focus is on the development of the study design and methodology and not on the treatments per se.
Receives: Drug: Listed for each disorder below, up to three drugs per disorder (too many characters to list in this field; see Intervention Description)
Treatment B (see interventions description)Active comparatorThe investigators will conduct 11 pragmatic trials using the EMR: brain tumors (prevent seizures), epilepsy (prevent other seizure types), mild cognitive impairment (improve memory), migraine (prevention), migraine (abortive), mild traumatic brain injury (prevent post concussion syndrome), multiple sclerosis (attenuate relapses), neuropathy (pain management), Parkinson's (treat motor symptoms), restless legs syndrome (treat sensory symptoms), stroke (secondary prevention). For each trial they will compare up to three medications or treatments either FDA approved for the indication, or commonly employed. The pragmatic trials will be small and primarily to demonstrate the feasibility of subgroup based adaptive assignment of treatments, electronic consenting, and data capture at the point of care using the EMR. The focus is on the development of the study design and methodology and not on the treatments per se.
Receives: Drug: Listed for each disorder below, up to three drugs per disorder (too many characters to list in this field; see Intervention Description)
Treatment C (see interventions description)Active comparatorThe investigators will conduct 11 pragmatic trials using the EMR: brain tumors (prevent seizures), epilepsy (prevent other seizure types), mild cognitive impairment (improve memory), migraine (prevention), migraine (abortive), mild traumatic brain injury (prevent post concussion syndrome), multiple sclerosis (attenuate relapses), neuropathy (pain management), Parkinson's (treat motor symptoms), restless legs syndrome (treat sensory symptoms), stroke (secondary prevention). For each trial they will compare up to three medications or treatments either FDA approved for the indication, or commonly employed. The pragmatic trials will be small and primarily to demonstrate the feasibility of subgroup based adaptive assignment of treatments, electronic consenting, and data capture at the point of care using the EMR. The focus is on the development of the study design and methodology and not on the treatments per se.
Receives: Drug: Listed for each disorder below, up to three drugs per disorder (too many characters to list in this field; see Intervention Description)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. survival free of discontinuation or alternative prevention drug (migraine trial)

    Measured: six months

  2. survival free of disability measured by FAQ score 9+ (memory trial)

    Measured: one year

  3. survival free of discontinuation or alternative anti epileptic drug (epilepsy trial)

    Measured: one year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Feb 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2016
  3. Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
3,300 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02670161
Sponsor's protocol ID
EH14-355
Other IDs
1R01HS024057-01
Status last verified
Aug 2025
First submitted
23 Jan 2016
Last updated
24 Aug 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Maraganore DM, Frigerio R, Kazmi N, Meyers SL, Sefa M, Walters SA, Silverstein JC. Quality improvement and practice-based research in neurology using the electronic medical record. Neurol Clin Pract. 2015 Oct;5(5):419-429. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000176.

    PubMed 26576324
  • Narayanan J, Dobrin S, Choi J, Rubin S, Pham A, Patel V, Frigerio R, Maurer D, Gupta P, Link L, Walters S, Wang C, Ji Y, Maraganore DM. Structured clinical documentation in the electronic medical record to improve quality and to support practice-based research in epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2017 Jan;58(1):68-76. doi: 10.1111/epi.13607. Epub 2016 Nov 19.

    PubMed 27864833

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Listed for each disorder below, up to three drugs per disorder (too many characters to list in this field; see Intervention Description) in people with Brain Tumors and Epilepsy, run by Endeavor Health at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

survival free of discontinuation or alternative prevention drug (migraine trial) (time frame: six months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02670161, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Aug 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in