HIV InfectionsPhase 3DRVNCT02671383
Evaluation of Low-dose Darunavir in a Switch Study
A Phase 3 study testing Darunavir and Lopinavir in people with HIV Infections, run by Willem Daniel Francois Venter at 1 site in South Africa.
Trial summary
This is a switch study to assess the non-inferiority (in terms of efficacy and safety) of darunavir (boosted with ritonavir, DRV/r 400mg/100mg daily) when compared with lopinavir (boosted with ritonavir, LPV/r total dose 800mg/200mg daily), in combination with a nucleoside backbone, administered as a second line… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV Infections
- What is being tested?
- Darunavir and Lopinavir
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Africa
- Study dates
- 30 Jun 2016to 16 May 2018
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participant is aged ≥18 years
- Participant weight >40kg
- Participant is on a LPV/r-containing regimen for at least 6 months with no history of other protease inhibitors
- Participant has a plasma HIV-1 RNA level <50 copies/mL in the last 60 days
- Participant is informed and has the ability to comprehend the full nature and purpose of the study, and give voluntary written informed consent before inclusion in the study
Who cannot join
- Participants who are taking any antiretrovirals other than nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors and LPV/r
- Any prior history of genotype-documented protease inhibitor resistance
- Participants who are taking rifampicin or any other therapy with major cytochrome P450 interactions, within the last month
- Participants who are allergic to sulphonamides
- Participants who have a current history of drug or alcohol abuse that, in the opinion of the investigator, may be an impediment to participant adherence to the protocol
- Female participants who are currently pregnant or breastfeeding
Show all 9Show fewer
- Female participants desiring pregnancy during the next year
- Participants who have a strong likelihood of relocating far enough to make access to the study site difficult
- Any condition(s) or laboratory report that, in the opinion of the investigator, might put the participant at risk, or interfere with the study objectives or the participant's adherence to study requirements
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
South Africa1 site
Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital
Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2196
About this study
Official title: A Randomised, Open Label Switch Study Comparing Darunavir/Ritonavir 400mg/100mg Daily With Lopinavir/Ritonavir 800mg/200mg Daily, in HIV-positive Participants
This is a switch study to assess the non-inferiority (in terms of efficacy and safety) of darunavir (boosted with ritonavir, DRV/r 400mg/100mg daily) when compared with lopinavir (boosted with ritonavir, LPV/r total dose 800mg/200mg daily), in combination with a nucleoside backbone, administered as a second line therapy in HIV positive individuals.
Read the detailed description
This is an open label randomised, parallel group, phase 3b, switch study to demonstrate non-inferiority of low-dose boosted darunavir (DRV/RTV 400/100 mg once daily) compared with boosted lopinavir-based (LPV/RTV 800/200 mg daily) second-line regimens when administered over 48 weeks in combination with two nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in patients infected with HIV-1 who are virologically suppressed and stable on a standard second-line regimen. All medications will be provided in an open-label design. Patients who are virologically suppressed and stable on a standard second-line regimen will be recruited for the study. There are concerns that switching these patients may result in virological failure as the study aimed at demonstrating non-inferiority of darunavir compared with Lopinavir. In such cases, the investigator will ensure that virological failures are investigated and patients are switched back to standard of care immediately. Participants will be patients who are receiving HIV treatment in public clinics. Interested patients will be invited to the study, information given, and only those who will give written informed consent will be screened, and if eligible enrolled into the study. Each enrolled participant will be follow-up at week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48 (exit visit) from enrolment date. Data will be collected using ethics-approved worksheets, and captured into REDCap. The data manager will ensure data are correct and complete by performing data verifications - physical and electronic. Internal quality control will be performed by dedicated staff based on the study quality plan to be implemented. The external study monitor will perform 100% eligibility checks on all signed informed consents in addition to other source verifications during her periodic site visits according to the monitoring plan to be implemented. Findings from the monitor will be implemented in the form of data/procedure corrections per good clinical practice, and all relevant staff trained and documented accordingly. Participants' records will be coded and stored in a lockable cabinet. Only study staff will have access to participants' records. All electronic documents relating to the study will be stored in password-protected computers and only accessible to study staff. Study staff are not allowed to share password among themselves or with anyone outside the study team. Designed in non-inferiority fashion, this study will enrol approximately 300 participants for 80% power to detect a 10% non-inferiority margin in the per protocol (PP) analysis. A Data Safety Management Board (DSMB) will oversee and review the interim data report. At the close of the study, results will be disseminated to participants, and the scientific community, as well as updated on clinicaltrial.gov.
- Conditions
- HIV Infections
- Being tested
- Darunavir, Lopinavir
- Keywords
- Antiretroviral Agents, Treatment, Viral Load
- Medical subject headings
- HIV Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DarunavirDrug
Also called Boosted darunavir (DRV/r)
Darunavir/ritonavir 400/100mg (DRV/r) once daily plus nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors.
LopinavirDrug
Also called Boosted lopinavir (LVP/r)
Lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100mg (LPV/r) twice daily plus nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Darunavir | Active comparator | Darunavir/Ritonavir 400/100mg once daily Receives: Drug: Darunavir |
| Lopinavir | Active comparator | Lopinavir/Ritonavir 400/100mg twice daily Receives: Drug: Lopinavir |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of participants with undetectable HIV-1 RNA levels
Measured: Week 48
Number of participants with certain adverse events related to the treatment
Measured: Week 48
Secondary outcomes (1)
Time to virologic failure
Measured: Week 48
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Study start30 Jun 2016
- Primary completion16 May 2018
- Study completion16 May 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HIV InfectionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Willem Daniel Francois Venter
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medical Research Council, South Africa
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Willem Daniel Francois Venter, University of Witwatersrand, South Africa
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02671383
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- WRHI052
- Acronym
- DRV
- Status last verified
- Jun 2018
- First submitted
- 28 Jan 2016
- Last updated
- 26 Jun 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Draaijer M, Lalla-Edward ST, Venter WDF, Vos A. Phone Calls to Retain Research Participants and Determinants of Reachability in an African Setting: Observational Study. JMIR Form Res. 2020 Sep 30;4(9):e19138. doi: 10.2196/19138.
PubMed 32996891Venter WDF, Moorhouse M, Sokhela S, Serenata C, Akpomiemie G, Qavi A, Mashabane N, Arulappan N, Sim JW, Sinxadi PZ, Wiesner L, Maharaj E, Wallis C, Boyles T, Ripin D, Stacey S, Chitauri G, Hill A. Low-dose ritonavir-boosted darunavir once daily versus ritonavir-boosted lopinavir for participants with less than 50 HIV RNA copies per mL (WRHI 052): a randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet HIV. 2019 Jul;6(7):e428-e437. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30081-5. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
PubMed 31202690
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jun 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised, Open Label Switch Study Comparing Darunavir/Ritonavir 400mg/100mg Daily With Lopinavir/Ritonavir 800mg/200mg Daily, in HIV-positive Participants
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02671383
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DRV / WRHI052
- Conditions
- HIV Infections
- Keywords
- Antiretroviral Agents, Treatment, Viral Load
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Willem Daniel Francois VenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medical Research Council, South Africa
- Study start
- 30 Jun 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 May 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 16 May 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a switch study to assess the non-inferiority (in terms of efficacy and safety) of darunavir (boosted with ritonavir, DRV/r 400mg/100mg daily) when compared with lopinavir (boosted with ritonavir, LPV/r total dose 800mg/200mg daily), in combination with a nucleoside backbone, administered as a second line therapy in HIV positive individuals.
Detailed description
This is an open label randomised, parallel group, phase 3b, switch study to demonstrate non-inferiority of low-dose boosted darunavir (DRV/RTV 400/100 mg once daily) compared with boosted lopinavir-based (LPV/RTV 800/200 mg daily) second-line regimens when administered over 48 weeks in combination with two nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in patients infected with HIV-1 who are virologically suppressed and stable on a standard second-line regimen. All medications will be provided in an open-label design. Patients who are virologically suppressed and stable on a standard second-line regimen will be recruited for the study. There are concerns that switching these patients may result in virological failure as the study aimed at demonstrating non-inferiority of darunavir compared with Lopinavir. In such cases, the investigator will ensure that virological failures are investigated and patients are switched back to standard of care immediately. Participants will be patients who are receiving HIV treatment in public clinics. Interested patients will be invited to the study, information given, and only those who will give written informed consent will be screened, and if eligible enrolled into the study. Each enrolled participant will be follow-up at week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48 (exit visit) from enrolment date. Data will be collected using ethics-approved worksheets, and captured into REDCap. The data manager will ensure data are correct and complete by performing data verifications - physical and electronic. Internal quality control will be performed by dedicated staff based on the study quality plan to be implemented. The external study monitor will perform 100% eligibility checks on all signed informed consents in addition to other source verifications during her periodic site visits according to the monitoring plan to be implemented. Findings from the monitor will be implemented in the form of data/procedure corrections per good clinical practice, and all relevant staff trained and documented accordingly. Participants' records will be coded and stored in a lockable cabinet. Only study staff will have access to participants' records. All electronic documents relating to the study will be stored in password-protected computers and only accessible to study staff. Study staff are not allowed to share password among themselves or with anyone outside the study team. Designed in non-inferiority fashion, this study will enrol approximately 300 participants for 80% power to detect a 10% non-inferiority margin in the per protocol (PP) analysis. A Data Safety Management Board (DSMB) will oversee and review the interim data report. At the close of the study, results will be disseminated to participants, and the scientific community, as well as updated on clinicaltrial.gov.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Darunavir | Active comparator | Drug: DarunavirDarunavir/Ritonavir 400/100mg once daily |
| Lopinavir | Active comparator | Drug: LopinavirLopinavir/Ritonavir 400/100mg twice daily |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Participant is aged ≥18 years
- Participant weight >40kg
- Participant is on a LPV/r-containing regimen for at least 6 months with no history of other protease inhibitors
- Participant has a plasma HIV-1 RNA level <50 copies/mL in the last 60 days
- Participant is informed and has the ability to comprehend the full nature and purpose of the study, and give voluntary written informed consent before inclusion in the study
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Participants who are taking any antiretrovirals other than nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors and LPV/r
- Any prior history of genotype-documented protease inhibitor resistance
- Participants who are taking rifampicin or any other therapy with major cytochrome P450 interactions, within the last month
- Participants who are allergic to sulphonamides
- Participants who have a current history of drug or alcohol abuse that, in the opinion of the investigator, may be an impediment to participant adherence to the protocol
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DarunavirAlso: Boosted darunavir (DRV/r)Darunavir/ritonavir 400/100mg (DRV/r) once daily plus nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors. | Drug | Darunavir |
| LopinavirAlso: Boosted lopinavir (LVP/r)Lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100mg (LPV/r) twice daily plus nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors. | Drug | Lopinavir |
Primary outcome
Number of participants with undetectable HIV-1 RNA levels
Time frame: Week 48
Number of participants with certain adverse events related to the treatment
Time frame: Week 48
1 secondary outcome
Time to virologic failure
Time frame: Week 48
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jun 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32996891Draaijer M, Lalla-Edward ST, Venter WDF, Vos A. Phone Calls to Retain Research Participants and Determinants of Reachability in an African Setting: Observational Study. JMIR Form Res. 2020 Sep 30;4(9):e19138. doi: 10.2196/19138.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31202690Venter WDF, Moorhouse M, Sokhela S, Serenata C, Akpomiemie G, Qavi A, Mashabane N, Arulappan N, Sim JW, Sinxadi PZ, Wiesner L, Maharaj E, Wallis C, Boyles T, Ripin D, Stacey S, Chitauri G, Hill A. Low-dose ritonavir-boosted darunavir once daily versus ritonavir-boosted lopinavir for participants with less than 50 HIV RNA copies per mL (WRHI 052): a randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet HIV. 2019 Jul;6(7):e428-e437. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30081-5. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for HIV Infections
RecruitingPhase 2
Evaluating the Safety and Immunogenicity of MTBVAC
HIV I Infection, Tuberculosis
Active, not recruiting
Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Mobile HIV Prevention App to Increase HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) Testing and PrEP Initiation Among Rural Men Who Have Sex With Men
HIV Infections, STI
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Virotherapy and Natural History Study of KHSV-Associated Multricentric Castleman s Disease With Correlates of Disease Activity
Lymphoproliferative Disorder, HHV-8
RecruitingObservational study
Clinical and Immunologic Monitoring of Patients With Known or Suspected HIV Infection
HIV
Enrolling by invitation
ORCHID: An Online Intervention for Persons With HIV (Miami)
HIV/AIDS, HPV Infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Darunavir and Lopinavir in people with HIV Infections, run by Willem Daniel Francois Venter at 1 site in South Africa.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jun 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Africa. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of participants with undetectable HIV-1 RNA levels (time frame: Week 48). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02671383, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jun 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 1 Nov 2026.