AzTrials
AzTrials

Minimal Residual DiseasePhase 2/3NCT02673008

MRD-directed Donor Lymphocyte Infusion for Reduce of Relapse After Allo-HSCT

A Phase 2/3 study testing donor lymphocyte infusion in people with Minimal Residual Disease and Donor Lymphocyte Infusion, run by Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) is an effective therapy for acute leukemia, but relapse remains an important problem. Therapy options for relapse include stopping immune suppression, re-induction of chemotherapy, donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), and another transplantation used alone or in… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 14 to 65 years
What is being tested?
donor lymphocyte infusion
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
206 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
Jan 2016to 31 Dec 2019
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 14 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • patients with acute leukemia
  • receiving allo-HSCT

Who cannot join

  • Any abnormality in a vital sign (e.g., heart rate, respiratory rate, or blood pressure)
  • Patients with any conditions not suitable for the trial (investigators' decision)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Department of Hematology,Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Minimal Residual Disease-directed Donor Lymphocyte Infusion for Reduce of Relapse After Allogenetic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) is an effective therapy for acute leukemia, but relapse remains an important problem. Therapy options for relapse include stopping immune suppression, re-induction of chemotherapy, donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), and another transplantation used alone or in combination. However, the efficacy of these interventions is limited. One approach to the relapse problem is to intervene before hematologic or pathologic relapse occurs based on minimal residual disease (MRD). In this study, the efficacy of MRD-directed DLI on transplantation outcomes will be evaluated in patients with acute leukemia receiving allo-HSCT.

Read the detailed description

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) is an effective therapy for acute leukemia, but relapse remains an important problem. Therapy options for relapse include stopping immune suppression, re-induction of chemotherapy, donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), and another transplantation used alone or in combination. However, the efficacy of these interventions is limited. One approach to the relapse problem is to intervene before hematologic or pathologic relapse occurs based on minimal residual disease (MRD) using immune or molecular techniques.DLI is an effective post-transplantation therapy for prophylaxis of leukemia relapse, but is associated with a substantial risk of GVHD. Whether MRD-directed DLI could improve outcomes remains unclear. In this study, the efficacy of MRD-directed DLI on transplantation outcomes will be evaluated in patients with acute leukemia receiving allo-HSCT.

Being tested
donor lymphocyte infusion
Medical subject headings
Neoplasm, Residual, Recurrence

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • donor lymphocyte infusionBiological

    DLI was administered at a median dose of 1.0 (range 0.7-1.4) ×10*8 mononuclear cells/kg.

Study groups in NCT02673008
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
MRD-directed DLIExperimentalFor patients with MRD+ and without grade II/>II aGVHD by day +60 post-transplantation, DLI was given once by day +60 and was then administered based on MRD and GVHD status. If patients were MRD negative, DLI was not given again; if patients were MRD positive and without GVHD, DLI was given monthly until GVHD occurred or MRD became negative or for a total of four times. For patients with NR or PR pre-transplantation and with MRD negative by day +60 post-transplantation, DLI was given once by day +90 regardless of MRD, and was then administered when MRD became positive. For patients with CR pre-transplantation and with MRD negative post-transplantation, DLI was not given unless MRD became positive.
Receives: Biological: donor lymphocyte infusion

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. relapse rate

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. overall survival

    Measured: 1 year

  2. disease-free survival

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Feb 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2016
  3. Primary completion25 Oct 2018
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
206 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02673008
Sponsor's protocol ID
MRD-directed DLI-2016
Status last verified
Jan 2016
First submitted
23 Jan 2016
Last updated
25 Feb 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Yan CH, Liu DH, Liu KY, Xu LP, Liu YR, Chen H, Han W, Wang Y, Qin YZ, Huang XJ. Risk stratification-directed donor lymphocyte infusion could reduce relapse of standard-risk acute leukemia patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2012 Apr 5;119(14):3256-62. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-09-380386. Epub 2012 Feb 14.

    PubMed 22337715
  • Fan M, Wang Y, Lin R, Lin T, Huang F, Fan Z, Xu Y, Yang T, Xu N, Shi P, Nie D, Lin D, Jiang Z, Wang S, Sun J, Huang X, Liu Q, Xuan L. Haploidentical transplantation has a superior graft-versus-leukemia effect than HLA-matched sibling transplantation for Ph- high-risk B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Chin Med J (Engl). 2022 Apr 20;135(8):930-939. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001852.

    PubMed 35467818
  • Yu S, Huang F, Fan Z, Xuan L, Nie D, Xu Y, Yang T, Wang S, Jiang Z, Xu N, Lin R, Ye J, Lin D, Sun J, Huang X, Wang Y, Liu Q. Haploidentical versus HLA-matched sibling transplantation for refractory acute leukemia undergoing sequential intensified conditioning followed by DLI: an analysis from two prospective data. J Hematol Oncol. 2020 Mar 12;13(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13045-020-00859-5.

    PubMed 32164760

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing donor lymphocyte infusion in people with Minimal Residual Disease and Donor Lymphocyte Infusion, run by Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Feb 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

relapse rate (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02673008, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Feb 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in