Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 3SELECT-NEXTNCT02675426
A Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Placebo in Adults With Rheumatoid Arthritis on a Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response to csDMARDs Alone
A Phase 3 study testing Upadacitinib in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by AbbVie at 167 sites in 38 countries.
Trial summary
The primary objectives of this study are to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of upadacitinib 30 mg once daily (QD) and 15 mg QD versus placebo for the treatment of signs and symptoms of adults with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis who were on a stable dose of csDMARDs and had an… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- Upadacitinib
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 661 participants
- Where
- 167 sitesin 38 countries
- Study dates
- 17 Dec 2015to 10 Mar 2022
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult male or female, at least 18 years old.
- Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for greater than or equal to 3 months.
- Subjects have been receiving conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) therapy for greater than or equal to 3 months and on a stable dose for greater than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the first dose of study drug. The following csDMARDs are allowed: methotrexate (MTX), sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, and leflunomide.
- Meets the following minimum disease activity criteria: greater than or equal to 6 swollen joints (based on 66 joint counts) and greater than or equal to 6 tender joints (based on 68 joint counts) at Screening and Baseline Visits.
- Subjects with prior exposure to at most one biologic DMARD (bDMARD) may be enrolled (up to 20% of study population) if they have documented evidence of intolerance to bDMARDs or limited exposure (less than 3 months) and have satisfied required washout periods.
Who cannot join
- Prior exposure to any Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor (including but not limited to tofacitinib, baricitinib, and filgotinib).
- History of inflammatory joint disease other than RA. History of secondary Sjogren's Syndrome is permitted.
- Subjects who are considered inadequate responders to bDMARD therapy as determined by the Investigator.
Trial locations and contacts
167 sites in 38 countries.
167 sites in 38 countries
United States57 sites
The Center for Rheumatology /ID# 138746
Albany, New York, 12206
Tekton Research, Inc. /ID# 141428
Austin, Texas, 78745
Western Washington Arthritis C /ID# 138728
Bothell, Washington, 98021
Trinity Universal Res Assoc /ID# 149271
Carrollton, Texas, 75007
Cincinnati Rheumatic Disease Study Group, Inc. /ID# 138868
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242-4468
Clinical Res of West FL, Inc. /ID# 138854
Clearwater, Florida, 33765
Arth and Osteo Clin Brazo Valley /ID# 147809
College Station, Texas, 77845
Covina Arthritis Clinic /ID# 139881
Covina, California, 91722
Metroplex Clinical Research /ID# 138698
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Denver Arthritis Clinic /ID# 139876
Denver, Colorado, 80230
Altoona Ctr Clinical Res /ID# 138741
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635
T. Joseph Raoof, MD, Inc. /ID# 140964
Encino, California, 91436
Aurora Rheumatology and Immunotherapy Center /ID# 139306
Franklin, Wisconsin, 53132
Comprehensive Arthritis Care, a division of Comprehensive Rheumatology Care PLLC /ID# 141021
Hendersonville, Tennessee, 37075-6213
Baylor College of Medicine /ID# 138682
Houston, Texas, 77030-3411
Houston Institute for Clin Res /ID# 138716
Houston, Texas, 77074
Institute of Arthritis Res /ID# 138548
Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404
Indiana Univ School of Med /ID# 140077
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Arthritis Consultants, P.A. /ID# 141138
Killeen, Texas, 76549
Allergy and Rheum Med Clin /ID# 146082
La Jolla, California, 92037
Advanced Rheumatology, PC /ID# 140071
Lansing, Michigan, 48910
Justus J. Fiechtner, MD, PC /ID# 138697
Lansing, Michigan, 48910
Bluegrass Community Research /ID# 138295
Lexington, Kentucky, 40515
Physician Res. Collaboration /ID# 138533
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68516
Pacific Arthritis Ctr Med Grp /ID# 138744
Los Angeles, California, 90045
Mansfield Health Center /ID# 141357
Mansfield, Massachusetts, 02048
AZ Arthritis and Rheum Assoc /ID# 148651
Mesa, Arizona, 85202
Ctr Arthritis & Rheumatic Dise /ID# 141696
Miami, Florida, 33173
Medallion Clinical Research Institute, LLC /ID# 140074
Naples, Florida, 34102
Suncoast Clinical Research /ID# 138633
New Port Richey, Florida, 34652
Health Research Oklahoma /ID# 138535
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103-2400
Westroads Clinical Research /ID# 138304
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114
Omega Research Consultants /ID# 139877
Orlando, Florida, 32810
Four Rivers Clinical Research /ID# 141134
Paducah, Kentucky, 42003
Arthritis Center, Inc. /ID# 141363
Palm Harbor, Florida, 34684
SunValley Arthritis Center, Lt /ID# 140452
Peoria, Arizona, 85381
AZ Arthritis and Rheum Researc /ID# 138500
Phoenix, Arizona, 85032-9306
AZ Arthritis and Rheum Researc /ID# 139286
Phoenix, Arizona, 85032-9306
AZ Arthritis & Rheuma Research /ID# 138598
Phoenix, Arizona, 85032
Arizona Research Center, Inc. /ID# 140448
Phoenix, Arizona, 85053-4061
Trinity Universal Research Association /ID# 148649
Plano, Texas, 75024-5283
MMP Women's Health /ID# 141542
Portland, Maine, 04102
OrthoIllinois /ID# 139695
Rockford, Illinois, 61114-4937
PMG Research of Salisbury /ID# 141023
Salisbury, North Carolina, 28144
Accurate Clinical Management /ID# 139338
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Clinical Investigation Special /ID# 139696
Skokie, Illinois, 60076
Arthritis Northwest, PLLC /ID# 138539
Spokane, Washington, 99204
Springfield Clinic /ID# 138602
Springfield, Illinois, 62702-3749
Articularis Healthcare Group, Inc d/b/a Low Country Rheumatology /ID# 138689
Summerville, South Carolina, 29486-7887
Arthritis Assoc of NW Ohio /ID# 140953
Toledo, Ohio, 43606
University of Arizona Cancer Center - North Campus /ID# 140451
Tucson, Arizona, 85719-1478
Robin K. Dore MD, Inc /ID# 138688
Tustin, California, 92780
Inland Rheum Clin Trials Inc. /ID# 138853
Upland, California, 91786
Deerbrook Medical Associates /ID# 139694
Vernon Hills, Illinois, 60061
Arthritis & Osteoporosis Clinic /ID# 138703
Waco, Texas, 76710
The Center for Rheumatology & /ID# 139203
Wheaton, Maryland, 20902
PMG Research of Wilmington LLC /ID# 140951
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401
South Korea9 sites
Daegu Catholic University Med /ID# 139249
Daegu, 705-718
Chungnam National University Hospital /ID# 138653
Daejeon, 35015
Chonnam National University Hospital /ID# 138651
Gwangju, Jeonranamdo, 61469
Inha University Hospital /ID# 149310
Incheon, Gwang Yeogsi, 22332
Hanyang University Seoul Hospi /ID# 138655
Seoul, Seongdong-gu, 04763
Cath Univ Seoul St Mary's Hosp /ID# 138652
Seoul, Seoul Teugbyeolsi, 06591
Seoul National University Hospital /ID# 138659
Seoul, 03080
Asan Medical Center /ID# 140579
Seoul, 05505
Ajou University Hospital /ID# 149311
Suwon, Gyeonggido, 16499
Russia7 sites
Kazan State Medical University /ID# 138413
Kazan', Tatarstan, Respublika, 420012
Republican Clin Hos n.a. Baran /ID# 139273
Petrozavodsk, 185019
LLC Novaya Klinika /ID# 139269
Pyatigorsk, Stavropol Kray, 357500
Samara Regional Clinical Hosp /ID# 148642
Samara, 443095
Ulyanovsk Regional Clin Hosp /ID# 139279
Ulyanovsk, 432018
Voronezh State Medical Univers /ID# 148431
Voronezh, 394036
Yaroslavi State Medical Univer /ID# 139908
Yaroslavl, 150000
Taiwan6 sites
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital /ID# 140869
Kaohsiung City, 80708
Far Eastern Memorial Hospital /ID# 140871
New Taipei City, 22060
China Medical University Hosp /ID# 139232
Taichung, Taichung, 40447
National Cheng Kung University Hospital /ID# 140868
Tainan, Tainan, 70403
Taipei Veterans General Hosp /ID# 139234
Taipei, 11217
National Taiwan Univ Hosp /ID# 141443
Taipei City, Taipei, 10002
United Kingdom6 sites
Western General Hospital /ID# 139524
Edinburgh, EH4 2XU
Leicester Royal Infirmary /ID# 139184
Leicester, England, LE1 5WW
Whipps Cross Univ Hospital /ID# 139523
London, London, City of, E11 1NR
The Royal Free Hospital /ID# 139191
London, London, City of, NW3 2QG
Southampton General Hospital /ID# 139169
Southampton, SO16 6YD
Warrington + Halton Hosp NHS /ID# 139195
Warrington, WA5 1LZ
Czechia5 sites
Revmatologie, s.r.o. /ID# 138899
Brno, 638 00
L.K.N. Arthrocentrum, s.r.o /ID# 141340
Hlučín, Moravian-Silesian Region, 748 01
Artroscan s.r.o. /ID# 138833
Ostrava, 722 00
Nemocnice Slany /ID# 141112
Slaný, 274 01
PV-MEDICAL s.r.o. /ID# 138913
Zlín, 760 01
Germany5 sites
Charité Universitätsmedizin Campus Mitte /ID# 139052
Berlin, 10117
Immanuel-Krankenhaus /ID# 139059
Berlin, 13125
Uniklinik Koln /ID# 139084
Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, 50937
Asklepios Klinik Altona /ID# 140466
Hamburg, 22763
Welcker, Planegg, DE /ID# 140467
Planegg, 82152
Poland5 sites
Osteo-Medic spolka cywilna /ID# 138371
Bialystok, Podlaskie Voivodeship, 15-351
NZOZ Centrum Reumatologiczne /ID# 138353
Elblag, Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship, 82-300
McBk Sc /Id# 138360
Grodzisk Mazowiecki, Masovian Voivodeship, 05-825
NZOZ Nasz Lekarz /ID# 138374
Torun, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship, 87-100
Rheuma Medicus /ID# 138372
Warsaw, 02-118
Slovakia5 sites
ARTROMAC n.o. /ID# 138428
Košice, 040 11
Nemocnica Kosice Saca, a.s. /ID# 138918
Košice, 040 15
Slovak research center Team Member, Thermium s.r.o. /ID# 139924
Pieštany, 921 01
Narodny ustav reumatickych chorob Piestany /ID# 138427
Pieštany, 921 12
REUMA-GLOBAL, s.r.o. /ID# 139912
Trnava, 91701
Australia4 sites
Emeritus Research /ID# 138773
Camberwell, Victoria, 3124
Coffs Clinical Trials /ID# 138747
Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, 2450
Barwon Rheumatology /ID# 138772
Geelong, Victoria, 3220
Optimus Clinical Research Pty. /ID# 138769
Kogarah, New South Wales, 2217
Canada4 sites
Groupe de Recherche en Maladies Osseuses /ID# 138906
Sainte-Foy, Quebec, G1V 3M7
Dr. Latha Naik /ID# 139089
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7K 3H3
Eastern Health /ID# 140431
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1B 3V6
Manitoba Clinic /ID# 139086
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A IM3
Croatia4 sites
Klinicki bolnicki centar Rijeka /ID# 138649
Rijeka, Primorje-Gorski Kotar County, 51000
Klinicka bolnica Sveti Duh /ID# 152812
Zagreb, 10000
Medical Center Kuna-Peric /ID# 140365
Zagreb, 10000
Poliklinika Bonifarm /ID# 141415
Zagreb, 10000
Spain4 sites
Hospital General Univ de Elche /ID# 138991
Elche, 03202
Hospital Clin Univ San Carlos /ID# 138993
Madrid, 28040
Hospital Regional de Malaga /ID# 138975
Málaga, Malaga, 29009
Hosp Nuestra Senora Esperanza /ID# 138997
Santiago de Compostela, 15705
Belgium3 sites
AZ Sint Lucas /ID# 141338
Bruges, 8310
Rhumaconsult SPRL /ID# 138813
Charleroi, Hainaut, 6000
UZ Gent /ID# 138806
Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, 9000
Estonia3 sites
Paernu Hospital /ID# 138961
Pärnu, 80010
Center of Clinical and Basic Research /ID# 141116
Tallinn, Harju, 10128
East Tallinn Central Hospital /ID# 140618
Tallinn, 10138
Finland3 sites
Helsinki Univ Central Hospital /ID# 140381
Helsinki, 00290
Kiljava Medical Research /ID# 139260
Hyvinkää, 05800
South Karelia Central Hospital /ID# 139973
Lappeenranta, 53130
Romania3 sites
Spitalul Clinic Judetean de Urgenta /ID# 138407
Cluj-Napoca, 400006
Spitalul Municipal Ploiesti /ID# 138405
Ploieşti, 100337
Spitalul Clinic Judetean de Ur /ID# 138393
Sibiu, 550245
South Africa3 sites
St. Augustine's Medical Centre /ID# 141352
Berea, KwaZulu-Natal, NL 4001
Arthritis Clinical Research Tr /ID# 138945
Cape Town, Western Cape, 7405
Winelands Medical Research Ctr /ID# 138944
Stellenbosch, Western Cape, 7600
Ukraine3 sites
LLC Revmocentr /ID# 139872
Kyiv, 04070
MNCE "Lviv City Clinical Hospital #4" /ID# 139873
Lviv, 79007
Odessa National Medical Univ /ID# 139179
Odesa, 65026
Argentina2 sites
Mautalen Salud e Investigacion /ID# 141419
Buenos Aires, 1128
Inst. Rheumatologic Strusberg /ID# 145648
Córdoba, 5000
Austria2 sites
Rheuma Zentrum Favoriten GmbH /ID# 138787
Vienna, 1100
Wilhelminenspital der Stadt Wien /ID# 138788
Vienna, 1160
Bosnia and Herzegovina2 sites
University Clinical Centre of the Republic of Srpska /ID# 138819
Banja Luka, Republika Srpska, 78000
University Clinical Centre of the Republic of Srpska /ID# 140372
Banja Luka, Republika Srpska, 78000
Bulgaria2 sites
Diag Consult Ctr 17 Sofia EOOD /ID# 141006
Sofia, 1505
Diagnostic Consultative Center /ID# 138882
Sofia, 1612
France2 sites
CHRU Tours - Hopital Trousseau /ID# 138969
Chambray-lès-Tours, 37170
Hopital Saint Joseph /ID# 149188
Marseille, Bouches-du-Rhone, 13285
Hungary2 sites
Revita Reumatologiai Rendelo /ID# 140761
Budapest, 1027
Fejer Megyei Szent Gyorgy Korh /ID# 138554
Székesfehérvár, 8000
Lithuania2 sites
Klaipeda University Hospital /ID# 141416
Klaipėda, 92288
Vilnius University Hospital /ID# 141348
Vilnius, LT-08661
Mexico2 sites
Centro Peninsular de Investigación Clínica SCP /ID# 148160
Colonia Centro, Yucatán, 97000
Unidad de Investigacion de las Enfermedades Reumatologicas SA de CV /ID# 138841
Mexico City, 06090
Portugal2 sites
Instituto Portugues De Reumatologia /ID# 148315
Lisbon, Lisbon District, 1050-034
Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, EPE /ID# 140594
Lisbon, Lisbon District, 1349-019
Greece1 site
University General Hospital of Heraklion "PA.G.N.I" /ID# 139115
Heraklion, 71110
Italy1 site
Universita di Catanzaro Magna Graecia /ID# 139316
Catanzaro, Calabria, 88100
Puerto Rico1 site
School of Medicine University of Puerto Rico-Medical Sciences Campus /ID# 139328
San Juan, 00935
Switzerland1 site
HFR Fribourg - Hopital Canton /ID# 139155
Fribourg, 1708
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Ankara Numune Training and Res /ID# 139237
Ankara, 06100
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Placebo in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Are on a Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) and Have an Inadequate Response to csDMARDs
The primary objectives of this study are to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of upadacitinib 30 mg once daily (QD) and 15 mg QD versus placebo for the treatment of signs and symptoms of adults with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis who were on a stable dose of csDMARDs and had an inadequate response to csDMARDs.
Read the detailed description
This Phase 3 multicenter study includes two periods. Period 1 is a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled period designed to compare the safety and efficacy of upadacitinib 30 mg once daily and upadacitinib 15 mg once daily versus placebo for the treatment of signs and symptoms of adults with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were on a stable dose of csDMARDs and had an inadequate response to csDMARDs.
Period 2 is a 248-week blinded long-term extension period to evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of upadacitinib 30 mg once daily and upadacitinib 15 mg once daily in participants who completed Period 1.
Participants were to be randomized in a 2:2:1:1 ratio using interactive response technology (IRT) to receive double-blind study drug in one of the following treatment groups:
- Group 1: Upadacitinib 30 mg QD in Period 1 → Upadacitinib 30 mg QD in Period 2
- Group 2: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD in Period 1 → Upadacitinib 15 mg QD in Period 2
- Group 3: Placebo in Period 1 → Upadacitinib 30 mg QD in Period 2
- Group 4: Placebo in Period 1 → Upadacitinib 15 mg QD in Period 2
Randomization was stratified by prior exposure to biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) (yes/no) and geographic region.
Following Protocol Amendment 6.0 approval in December 2019, all participants still on study received open-label upadacitinib 15 mg QD, including those on upadacitinib 30 mg QD, with the earliest switch occurring at the Week 168 visit.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- Placebo, Upadacitinib
- Keywords
- Musculoskeletal Disease, Arthritis, Joint Disease, Anti-inflammatory agents, Antirheumatic agents, Upadacitinib, ABT-494
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Arthritis, Joint Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PlaceboDrug
Tablet; Oral
UpadacitinibDrug
Also called ABT-494, Rinvoq
Tablet; Oral
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Upadacitinib 15 mg | Experimental | Period 1: Participants receive upadacitinib 15 mg once daily for 12 weeks.
Period 2: Participants continue to receive upadacitinib 15 mg once daily for an additional 248 weeks. Receives: Drug: Upadacitinib |
| Upadacitinib 30 mg | Experimental | Period 1: Participants receive upadacitinib 30 mg once daily for 12 weeks.
Period 2: Participants continue to receive upadacitinib 30 mg once daily for an additional 248 weeks or until implementation of Protocol Amendment 6 at which time participants switch to receive upadacitinib 15 mg once daily. Receives: Drug: Upadacitinib |
| Placebo / Upadacitinib 15 mg | Experimental | Period 1: Participants receive placebo once daily for 12 weeks.
Period 2: Participants receive upadacitinib 15 mg once daily for 248 weeks. Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: Upadacitinib |
| Placebo / Upadacitinib 30 mg | Experimental | Period 1: Participants receive placebo once daily for 12 weeks.
Period 2: Participants receive upadacitinib 30 mg once daily for 248 weeks or until implementation of Protocol Amendment 6 at which time participants switch to receive upadacitinib 15 mg once daily. Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: Upadacitinib |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12
The primary endpoint for United States (US)/Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory purposes was ACR 20% response (ACR20) at Week 12. Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria:
- ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count;
- ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and
- ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
- Physician global assessment of disease activity;
- Patient global assessment of disease activity;
- Patient assessment of pain;
- Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI);
- High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 12
The primary endpoint for European Union (EU)/European Medicines Agency (EMA) regulatory purposes was low disease activity, based on a Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)-CRP score of ≤ 3.2 at Week 12.
The DAS28 is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity.
A DAS28 score less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity.
Measured: Week 12
Secondary outcomes (10)
Change From Baseline in in Disease Activity Score 28 (CRP) at Week 12
The DAS28 is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A negative change from Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) indicates improvement in disease activity.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12
The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire that measures the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and errands and chores) over the past week. Participants assessed their ability to do each task on a scale from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). Scores were averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 represents very severe, high-dependency disability.
A negative change from Baseline in the overall score indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 12
The Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) Version 2 is a self-administered questionnaire that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life during the past 4 weeks. The SF-36 consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health).
The physical component summary score is a weighted combination of the 8 subscales with positive weighting for physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The PCS was calculated using norm-based scoring so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores are associated with better functioning/quality of life; a positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on DAS28 (CRP) at Week 12
Clinical remission (CR) based on DAS28 (CRP) is defined as achieving a DAS28 (CRP) of less than 2.6.
DAS28 (CRP) is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity Based on CDAI at Week 12
Low disease activity based on the clinical disease activity index (CDAI) is defined as a CDAI score ≤ 10.
CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the total tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity.
Measured: Week 12
Change From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 12
Participants were asked to indicate the time it took for them to get as limber as possible after awakening with morning stiffness over the past 7 days.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) at Week 12
The FACIT-Fatigue scale is a 13-item tool that measures an individual's level of fatigue during their usual daily activities over the past 7 days. Each of the fatigue and impact of fatigue items are measured on a five point Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The FACIT-Fatigue scale is the sum of the individual 13 scores and ranges from 0 to 52 where higher scores indicate better the quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline and week 12
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 12
Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR50 response criteria:
- ≥ 50% improvement in 68-tender joint count;
- ≥ 50% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and
- ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
- Physician global assessment of disease activity;
- Patient global assessment of disease activity;
- Patient assessment of pain;
- Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI);
- High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 12
Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR70 response criteria:
- ≥ 70% improvement in 68-tender joint count;
- ≥ 70% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and
- ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
- Physician global assessment of disease activity;
- Patient global assessment of disease activity;
- Patient assessment of pain;
- Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI);
- High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 1
Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria:
- ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count;
- ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and
- ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
- Physician global assessment of disease activity;
- Patient global assessment of disease activity;
- Patient assessment of pain;
- Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI);
- High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
Measured: Baseline and Week 1
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Study start17 Dec 2015
- Primary completion21 Apr 2017
- Study completion10 Mar 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (15)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AbbVieThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 661 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVie
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- AbbVie Inc., Study director, AbbVie
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02675426
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- M13-549
- Other IDs
- 2015-003332-13, 2015
- Acronym
- SELECT-NEXT
- Status last verified
- Mar 2023
- First submitted
- 11 Dec 2015
- Last updated
- 11 Apr 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: AbbVie is committed to responsible data sharing regarding the clinical trials we sponsor. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information (e.g., protocols, analyses plans, clinical study reports), as long as the trials are not part of an ongoing or planned regulatory submission. This includes requests for clinical trial data for unlicensed products and indications.
Publications
Burmester GR, Kremer JM, Van den Bosch F, Kivitz A, Bessette L, Li Y, Zhou Y, Othman AA, Pangan AL, Camp HS. Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (SELECT-NEXT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018 Jun 23;391(10139):2503-2512. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31115-2. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
PubMed 29908669Burmester GR, Deodhar A, Irvine AD, Panaccione R, Winthrop KL, Vleugels RA, Levy G, Suravaram S, Palac H, Wegrzyn L, Ford S, Meerwein S, Guttman-Yassky E. Safety Profile of Upadacitinib: Descriptive Analysis in Over 27,000 Patient-Years Across Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, Axial Spondyloarthritis, Atopic Dermatitis, and Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Adv Ther. 2025 Oct;42(10):5215-5237. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03328-y. Epub 2025 Aug 28.
PubMed 40875187Burmester GR, Van den Bosch F, Tesser J, Shmagel A, Liu Y, Khan N, Camp HS, Kivitz A. Upadacitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Conventional Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: Efficacy and Safety Through 5 Years (SELECT-NEXT). J Rheumatol. 2024 Jul 1;51(7):663-672. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2023-1062.
PubMed 38621793Rubbert-Roth A, Kakehasi AM, Takeuchi T, Schmalzing M, Palac H, Coombs D, Liu J, Anyanwu SI, Lippe R, Curtis JR. Malignancy in the Upadacitinib Clinical Trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis, and Non-radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Feb;11(1):97-112. doi: 10.1007/s40744-023-00621-6. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
PubMed 37982966Charles-Schoeman C, Choy E, McInnes IB, Mysler E, Nash P, Yamaoka K, Lippe R, Khan N, Shmagel AK, Palac H, Suboticki J, Curtis JR. MACE and VTE across upadacitinib clinical trial programmes in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. RMD Open. 2023 Nov;9(4):e003392. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003392.
PubMed 37945286Fleischmann R, Curtis JR, Charles-Schoeman C, Mysler E, Yamaoka K, Richez C, Palac H, Dilley D, Liu J, Strengholt S, Burmester G. Safety profile of upadacitinib in patients at risk of cardiovascular disease: integrated post hoc analysis of the SELECT phase III rheumatoid arthritis clinical programme. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 Sep;82(9):1130-1141. doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-223916. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
PubMed 37308218Conaghan PG, Pavelka K, Hsieh SC, Bonnington TL, Kent TC, Marchbank K, Edwards CJ. Evaluating the efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with moderate rheumatoid arthritis: a post-hoc analysis of the SELECT phase 3 trials. Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2023 Feb 8;7(1):rkad017. doi: 10.1093/rap/rkad017. eCollection 2023.
PubMed 36794283Burmester GR, Cohen SB, Winthrop KL, Nash P, Irvine AD, Deodhar A, Mysler E, Tanaka Y, Liu J, Lacerda AP, Palac H, Shaw T, Mease PJ, Guttman-Yassky E. Safety profile of upadacitinib over 15 000 patient-years across rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and atopic dermatitis. RMD Open. 2023 Feb;9(1):e002735. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002735.
PubMed 36754548Kakehasi AM, Radominski SC, Baravalle MD, Palazuelos FCI, Garcia-Garcia C, Arruda MS, Curi M, Liu J, Qiao M, Velez-Sanchez P, Vargas JI. Safety of upadacitinib in Latin American patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an integrated safety analysis of the SELECT phase 3 clinical program. Clin Rheumatol. 2023 May;42(5):1249-1258. doi: 10.1007/s10067-023-06513-y. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
PubMed 36715850Bergman M, Buch MH, Tanaka Y, Citera G, Bahlas S, Wong E, Song Y, Zueger P, Ali M, Strand V. Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Long-Term Upadacitinib Therapy in Five Randomized Controlled Trials. Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Dec;9(6):1517-1529. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00483-4. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
PubMed 36125701Bergman M, Tundia N, Yang M, Orvis E, Clewell J, Bensimon A. Economic Benefit from Improvements in Quality of Life with Upadacitinib: Comparisons with Tofacitinib and Methotrexate in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Adv Ther. 2021 Dec;38(12):5649-5661. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01930-4. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
PubMed 34636000Yamaoka K, Tanaka Y, Kameda H, Khan N, Sasaki N, Harigai M, Song Y, Zhang Y, Takeuchi T. The Safety Profile of Upadacitinib in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Japan. Drug Saf. 2021 Jun;44(6):711-722. doi: 10.1007/s40264-021-01067-x. Epub 2021 May 27.
PubMed 34041702Cohen SB, van Vollenhoven RF, Winthrop KL, Zerbini CAF, Tanaka Y, Bessette L, Zhang Y, Khan N, Hendrickson B, Enejosa JV, Burmester GR. Safety profile of upadacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis: integrated analysis from the SELECT phase III clinical programme. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Mar;80(3):304-311. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218510. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
PubMed 33115760Strand V, Pope J, Tundia N, Friedman A, Camp HS, Pangan A, Ganguli A, Fuldeore M, Goldschmidt D, Schiff M. Upadacitinib improves patient-reported outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: results from SELECT-NEXT. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Dec 9;21(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-2037-1.
PubMed 31815649Nader A, Mohamed MF, Winzenborg I, Doelger E, Noertersheuser P, Pangan AL, Othman AA. Exposure-Response Analyses of Upadacitinib Efficacy and Safety in Phase II and III Studies to Support Benefit-Risk Assessment in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Apr;107(4):994-1003. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1671. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
PubMed 31610021
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Apr 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Placebo in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Are on a Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) and Have an Inadequate Response to csDMARDs
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02675426
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SELECT-NEXT / M13-549
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Keywords
- Musculoskeletal Disease, Arthritis, Joint Disease, Anti-inflammatory agents, Antirheumatic agents, Upadacitinib, ABT-494
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 661 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVieIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 17 Dec 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Mar 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 7 Oct 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objectives of this study are to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of upadacitinib 30 mg once daily (QD) and 15 mg QD versus placebo for the treatment of signs and symptoms of adults with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis who were on a stable dose of csDMARDs and had an inadequate response to csDMARDs.
Detailed description
This Phase 3 multicenter study includes two periods. Period 1 is a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled period designed to compare the safety and efficacy of upadacitinib 30 mg once daily and upadacitinib 15 mg once daily versus placebo for the treatment of signs and symptoms of adults with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were on a stable dose of csDMARDs and had an inadequate response to csDMARDs.
Period 2 is a 248-week blinded long-term extension period to evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of upadacitinib 30 mg once daily and upadacitinib 15 mg once daily in participants who completed Period 1.
Participants were to be randomized in a 2:2:1:1 ratio using interactive response technology (IRT) to receive double-blind study drug in one of the following treatment groups:
- Group 1: Upadacitinib 30 mg QD in Period 1 → Upadacitinib 30 mg QD in Period 2
- Group 2: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD in Period 1 → Upadacitinib 15 mg QD in Period 2
- Group 3: Placebo in Period 1 → Upadacitinib 30 mg QD in Period 2
- Group 4: Placebo in Period 1 → Upadacitinib 15 mg QD in Period 2
Randomization was stratified by prior exposure to biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) (yes/no) and geographic region.
Following Protocol Amendment 6.0 approval in December 2019, all participants still on study received open-label upadacitinib 15 mg QD, including those on upadacitinib 30 mg QD, with the earliest switch occurring at the Week 168 visit.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Upadacitinib 15 mg | Experimental | Drug: UpadacitinibPeriod 1: Participants receive upadacitinib 15 mg once daily for 12 weeks. Period 2: Participants continue to receive upadacitinib 15 mg once daily for an additional 248 weeks. |
| Upadacitinib 30 mg | Experimental | Drug: UpadacitinibPeriod 1: Participants receive upadacitinib 30 mg once daily for 12 weeks. Period 2: Participants continue to receive upadacitinib 30 mg once daily for an additional 248 weeks or until implementation of Protocol Amendment 6 at which time participants switch to receive upadacitinib 15 mg once daily. |
| Placebo / Upadacitinib 15 mg | Experimental | Drug: Placebo, Drug: UpadacitinibPeriod 1: Participants receive placebo once daily for 12 weeks. Period 2: Participants receive upadacitinib 15 mg once daily for 248 weeks. |
| Placebo / Upadacitinib 30 mg | Experimental | Drug: Placebo, Drug: UpadacitinibPeriod 1: Participants receive placebo once daily for 12 weeks. Period 2: Participants receive upadacitinib 30 mg once daily for 248 weeks or until implementation of Protocol Amendment 6 at which time participants switch to receive upadacitinib 15 mg once daily. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Adult male or female, at least 18 years old.
- Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for greater than or equal to 3 months.
- Subjects have been receiving conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) therapy for greater than or equal to 3 months and on a stable dose for greater than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the first dose of study drug. The following csDMARDs are allowed: methotrexate (MTX), sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, and leflunomide.
- Meets the following minimum disease activity criteria: greater than or equal to 6 swollen joints (based on 66 joint counts) and greater than or equal to 6 tender joints (based on 68 joint counts) at Screening and Baseline Visits.
- Subjects with prior exposure to at most one biologic DMARD (bDMARD) may be enrolled (up to 20% of study population) if they have documented evidence of intolerance to bDMARDs or limited exposure (less than 3 months) and have satisfied required washout periods.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Prior exposure to any Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor (including but not limited to tofacitinib, baricitinib, and filgotinib).
- History of inflammatory joint disease other than RA. History of secondary Sjogren's Syndrome is permitted.
- Subjects who are considered inadequate responders to bDMARD therapy as determined by the Investigator.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PlaceboTablet; Oral | Drug | Placebo / Upadacitinib 15 mg, Placebo / Upadacitinib 30 mg |
| UpadacitinibAlso: ABT-494, RinvoqTablet; Oral | Drug | Placebo / Upadacitinib 15 mg, Placebo / Upadacitinib 30 mg, Upadacitinib 15 mg, Upadacitinib 30 mg |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
The primary endpoint for United States (US)/Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory purposes was ACR 20% response (ACR20) at Week 12. Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: 1. ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity; * Patient global assessment of disease activity; * Patient assessment of pain; * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI); * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
The primary endpoint for European Union (EU)/European Medicines Agency (EMA) regulatory purposes was low disease activity, based on a Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)-CRP score of ≤ 3.2 at Week 12. The DAS28 is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28 score less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity.
10 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in in Disease Activity Score 28 (CRP) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on DAS28 (CRP) at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity Based on CDAI at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Change From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 1
Time frame: Baseline and Week 1
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Apr 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 29908669Burmester GR, Kremer JM, Van den Bosch F, Kivitz A, Bessette L, Li Y, Zhou Y, Othman AA, Pangan AL, Camp HS. Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (SELECT-NEXT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018 Jun 23;391(10139):2503-2512. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31115-2. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40875187Burmester GR, Deodhar A, Irvine AD, Panaccione R, Winthrop KL, Vleugels RA, Levy G, Suravaram S, Palac H, Wegrzyn L, Ford S, Meerwein S, Guttman-Yassky E. Safety Profile of Upadacitinib: Descriptive Analysis in Over 27,000 Patient-Years Across Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, Axial Spondyloarthritis, Atopic Dermatitis, and Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Adv Ther. 2025 Oct;42(10):5215-5237. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03328-y. Epub 2025 Aug 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38621793Burmester GR, Van den Bosch F, Tesser J, Shmagel A, Liu Y, Khan N, Camp HS, Kivitz A. Upadacitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Conventional Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: Efficacy and Safety Through 5 Years (SELECT-NEXT). J Rheumatol. 2024 Jul 1;51(7):663-672. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2023-1062.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37982966Rubbert-Roth A, Kakehasi AM, Takeuchi T, Schmalzing M, Palac H, Coombs D, Liu J, Anyanwu SI, Lippe R, Curtis JR. Malignancy in the Upadacitinib Clinical Trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis, and Non-radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Feb;11(1):97-112. doi: 10.1007/s40744-023-00621-6. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37945286Charles-Schoeman C, Choy E, McInnes IB, Mysler E, Nash P, Yamaoka K, Lippe R, Khan N, Shmagel AK, Palac H, Suboticki J, Curtis JR. MACE and VTE across upadacitinib clinical trial programmes in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. RMD Open. 2023 Nov;9(4):e003392. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003392.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37308218Fleischmann R, Curtis JR, Charles-Schoeman C, Mysler E, Yamaoka K, Richez C, Palac H, Dilley D, Liu J, Strengholt S, Burmester G. Safety profile of upadacitinib in patients at risk of cardiovascular disease: integrated post hoc analysis of the SELECT phase III rheumatoid arthritis clinical programme. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 Sep;82(9):1130-1141. doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-223916. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36794283Conaghan PG, Pavelka K, Hsieh SC, Bonnington TL, Kent TC, Marchbank K, Edwards CJ. Evaluating the efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with moderate rheumatoid arthritis: a post-hoc analysis of the SELECT phase 3 trials. Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2023 Feb 8;7(1):rkad017. doi: 10.1093/rap/rkad017. eCollection 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36754548Burmester GR, Cohen SB, Winthrop KL, Nash P, Irvine AD, Deodhar A, Mysler E, Tanaka Y, Liu J, Lacerda AP, Palac H, Shaw T, Mease PJ, Guttman-Yassky E. Safety profile of upadacitinib over 15 000 patient-years across rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and atopic dermatitis. RMD Open. 2023 Feb;9(1):e002735. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002735.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36715850Kakehasi AM, Radominski SC, Baravalle MD, Palazuelos FCI, Garcia-Garcia C, Arruda MS, Curi M, Liu J, Qiao M, Velez-Sanchez P, Vargas JI. Safety of upadacitinib in Latin American patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an integrated safety analysis of the SELECT phase 3 clinical program. Clin Rheumatol. 2023 May;42(5):1249-1258. doi: 10.1007/s10067-023-06513-y. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36125701Bergman M, Buch MH, Tanaka Y, Citera G, Bahlas S, Wong E, Song Y, Zueger P, Ali M, Strand V. Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Long-Term Upadacitinib Therapy in Five Randomized Controlled Trials. Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Dec;9(6):1517-1529. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00483-4. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34636000Bergman M, Tundia N, Yang M, Orvis E, Clewell J, Bensimon A. Economic Benefit from Improvements in Quality of Life with Upadacitinib: Comparisons with Tofacitinib and Methotrexate in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Adv Ther. 2021 Dec;38(12):5649-5661. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01930-4. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34041702Yamaoka K, Tanaka Y, Kameda H, Khan N, Sasaki N, Harigai M, Song Y, Zhang Y, Takeuchi T. The Safety Profile of Upadacitinib in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Japan. Drug Saf. 2021 Jun;44(6):711-722. doi: 10.1007/s40264-021-01067-x. Epub 2021 May 27.
- Related Info.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. AbbVie is committed to responsible data sharing regarding the clinical trials we sponsor. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information (e.g., protocols, analyses plans, clinical study reports), as long as the trials are not part of an ongoing or planned regulatory submission. This includes requests for clinical trial data for unlicensed products and indications.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
AbbVie Inc. study director
AbbVie
167 sites in 38 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Upadacitinib in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by AbbVie at 167 sites in 38 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 167 sites in United States, South Korea, Russia, Taiwan, United Kingdom and 33 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 Oct 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 (time frame: Baseline and Week 12). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02675426, which also lists 15 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Apr 2023.