IVFPhase 2NCT02677259
Luteal Phase Estradiol Support for In Vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles
A Phase 2 study testing 17-beta estradiol and Micronized progesterone in people with IVF, run by One Fertility.
Trial summary
Optimizing in vitro fertilization (IVF) success is more important than ever, in light of new public funding of IVF in Ontario, Canada. In patients undergoing IVF using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues, the luteal phase appears to be compromised, which may be a result of controlled-ovarian… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 42 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- IVF
- What is being tested?
- 17-beta estradiol and Micronized progesterone
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 506 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- May 2016to Jun 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 42 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Indications for IVF/ICSI include male factor, diminished ovarian reserve, tubal factor, ovulatory dysfunction and unexplained infertility.
Who cannot join
- none
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: Luteal Phase Estradiol Support for In Vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles: a Randomized, Controlled Study
Optimizing in vitro fertilization (IVF) success is more important than ever, in light of new public funding of IVF in Ontario, Canada. In patients undergoing IVF using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues, the luteal phase appears to be compromised, which may be a result of controlled-ovarian hyperstimulation, significant fluctuations in hormone levels, the impact of the oocyte retrieval process, or direct compromise of the corpus luteum. Progesterone support is definitely necessary during the luteal phase to facilitate implantation but whether estrogen supplementation is also needed remains unclear. The present study aims to determine whether estradiol support during the luteal phase improves clinical pregnancy rate in patients undergoing IVF.
Read the detailed description
Background:
It is well established that the luteal phase is compromised in IVF cycles using GnRH analogues. Use of GnRH agonists or antagonists results in decreased production of estrogen and progesterone, a decrease in luteal phase length, and impaired endogenous gonadotropin secretion caused by persistent pituitary suppression. While the benefits of progesterone support during the luteal phase of an IVF cycle are well established, the role of estrogen support during the luteal phase is less clear.
The corpus luteum produces both progesterone and estradiol in support of the endometrium for implantation. Estrogen produced during the luteal phase modulates the concentration of progesterone receptors within the secretory endometrium in an effort to maintain sufficient receptor concentrations for progesterone stimulation. Stewart et al. highlighted the importance of luteal phase serum estradiol concentration after observing a significant difference in midluteal serum estradiol concentration between conception and non-conception cycles. This observation appears to hold true in patients undergoing IVF as well. Shahara et al. demonstrated that, not only the absolute estradiol level, but also the magnitude of estradiol decline (as measured by the ratio of peak estradiol at the time of hCG administration to midluteal estradiol) was predictive of IVF success. These studies support the idea that luteal phase estradiol supplementation may be important to implantation and IVF success.
Studies investigating the effect of luteal phase estradiol supplementation have produced conflicting results. In a small randomized, controlled trial (RCT) by Farhi et al., IVF patients receiving both oral estradiol and vaginal progesterone luteal phase support achieved higher clinical pregnancy and implantation rates than patients received vaginal progesterone alone. Lukaszuk et al. confirmed these findings and found that the most significant benefit occurred at the highest dose of estradiol administered (6mg). Elgindy et al. observed a correlation between mid-luteal serum estradiol concentration and clinical pregnancy rates in patients receiving 6mg of oral estradiol15. Similar benefits of luteal phase estradiol support have been demonstrated in both vaginal and transdermal formulations.
Conversely, multiple older studies have failed to demonstrate a benefit of luteal phase estradiol support in IVF cycles. Lin et al., in a RCT of 402 patients undergoing IVF, found no benefit of luteal phase oral estradiol. This finding was supported by studies investigating both vaginal and transdermal formulations of luteal phase estradiol support. A recent meta-analysis also did not demonstrate a statistically significant benefit of luteal phase estradiol administration to IVF outcomes, though the common odds ratio was 1.18 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.41) with a p value of 0.07. Significant heterogeneity was observed between the included studies and the authors admit that more large-scale RCTs are needed to appropriately address this question.
Since these trials were done, there has been a major shift away from long GnRH agonist stimulation to short protocol GnRH antagonist use. All but three of the studies of luteal phase estradiol support have focused on IVF cycles using the old GnRH agonist protocols given the frequency of their application. The few studies using GnRH antagonist protocols have not shown a benefit of luteal phase estradiol support but these studies have been small in scale (total n=426) or failed to report on important outcomes such as clinical pregnancy rate. Both GnRH agonists and antagonists suppress pituitary gonadotropin production and lead to a luteal phase deficiency. GnRH antagonists appear to promote premature luteolysis causing a reduction in luteal phase length and ultimately decreased pregnancy rates. Given the frequency with which these protocols are now used in IVF, a large-scale study is greatly needed to address the role of estradiol luteal phase supplementation.
It is well established that the luteal phase in IVF cycles using GnRH analogues is compromised and some form of luteal phase support is required. Compelling evidence exists to support the use of luteal phase progesterone but the role of estradiol remains controversial. Most of the existing studies are small in size and lack sufficient power. Few studies exist to determine the role of estrogen supplementation in GnRH antagonist IVF cycles. This well-powered RCT will address this important clinical question.
Methods:
Design: This is a single center RCT, conducted at ONE Fertility Burlington.
Inclusion criteria: Indications for IVF/ICSI include male factor, diminished ovarian reserve, tubal factor, ovulatory dysfunction and unexplained infertility. Female age will be 42 years or less.
IVF protocol: A short, GnRH antagonist protocol will be used for all patients. Starting on cycle day 3, ovarian stimulation will be performed using a combination of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (Puregon, Ferring, or; Gonal-F, EMD Serono), medications mimicking luteinizing hormone (LH) activity, i.e recombinant human choriogonadotropin (hCG, Ferring) and/or medications containing both FSH and LH (Menopur, Ferring). Medications will be dosed according to the patient's diagnosis and ovarian reserve measurements. Follicular development will be monitored with serial transvaginal ultrasounds, and serum estradiol, progesterone and LH concentrations. A GnRH antagonist (Orgalutran, EMD Serono) will be commenced for pituitary suppression between cycle day 6 to 9. Oocyte retrieval will be performed 36 hours after administration of choriogonadotropin alpha (Ovidrel, EMD Serono), or a GnRH agonist (Decapeptyl, Ferring), to complete oocyte maturation once a sufficient cohort of mature follicles has been identified. A maximum of 2 embryos will be transferred on either day 3 or day 5 following oocyte retrieval. Serum beta hCG measurement will be performed 17 days after oocyte retrieval and, if positive, clinical pregnancy will be confirmed every 2 weeks commencing at 6 weeks gestation until 12 weeks gestation.
Recruitment and Randomization: Recruitment will occur and informed consent will be obtained at the time of treatment consent. Participants will be randomized at the time of recruitment by way of numbered, sealed envelopes to receive either 17-beta estradiol 3 mg PO/PV BID plus micronized progesterone 200 mg PV TID (treatment group) or micronized progesterone alone (control group) for luteal support commencing the day after oocyte retrieval. 17-beta estradiol will be continued until the time of pregnancy testing and, if β-hCG is positive, until 6 weeks gestation (4 weeks total). Progesterone will be continued until the time of pregnancy testing and, if β-hCG is positive, until 10 weeks gestation (8 weeks total). There will be no blinding to group allocation and no placebo. Subjects will be assigned a unique subject number prior to data analysis in order to avoid the use of any identifying information. Data will be collected using a standardized patient data form in a secure computerized database.
Outcomes: The primary outcome is clinical pregnancy, defined as the presence of fetal heart activity on ultrasound at or beyond 6 weeks gestation. Secondary outcomes include ongoing pregnancy rate (number of clinical pregnancies on ultrasound continuing beyond 12 weeks gestation/number of clinical pregnancies), implantation rate (number of clinical pregnancies/number of embryos transferred), luteal phase serum estradiol and progesterone concentration (performed at oocyte retrieval, 10 days after retrieval, and at the time of serum pregnancy testing, i.e. 17 days after retrieval), miscarriage rate (number of pregnancy losses before 20 weeks/number of clinical pregnancies) and ectopic pregnancy rate (number of ectopic pregnancies on ultrasound/number of clinical pregnancies).
Data Analysis: Descriptive analyses will be performed using SPSS software (IBM Corp., Version 22). Associations between categorical variables will be analyzed using a combination of Chi-square and Fisher's Exact tests. Associations between continuous variables will be analyzed using a combination of independent sample t-tests and logistic regression.
Sample Size Calculation: Based on a sample size calculation with assumptions of ß = 80%, α = 0.05 and an effect size of 25% in clinical pregnancy rate, a total of 506 subjects (253 per arm) will need to be recruited. This is feasible within this center over a two-year period or less, based on the current number of stimulated cycles per year of 360 and a high rate of compliance and patient interest in the study.
- Conditions
- IVF
- Being tested
- 17-beta estradiol, Micronized progesterone
- Keywords
- luteal phase, estradiol, pregnancy rate
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
17-beta estradiolDrug
Also called Estrace
Micronized progesteroneDrug
Also called Endometrin
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Estradiol + Standard Luteal Phase Support | Experimental | 1. 17-beta estradiol 3 mg PO/PV BID from day of oocyte retrieval until 6 weeks gestation
2. Micronized progesterone 200 mg PV TID from day of oocyte retrieval until 10 weeks gestation Receives: Drug: 17-beta estradiol; Drug: Micronized progesterone |
| Standard Luteal Phase Support | Active comparator | 1. Micronized progesterone 200 mg PV TID from day of oocyte retrieval until 10 weeks gestation Receives: Drug: Micronized progesterone |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinical Pregnancy
Presence of fetal heart activity on ultrasound at or beyond 6 weeks gestation.
Measured: Assessed at 6 weeks gestation
Secondary outcomes (5)
Ongoing Pregnancy Rate
Number of clinical pregnancies on ultrasound continuing beyond 12 weeks gestation/number of clinical pregnancies
Measured: Assessed at 12+1 weeks gestation
Implantation Rate
Number of clinical pregnancies/number of embryos transferred
Measured: Assessed at 6 weeks gestation
Luteal phase serum estradiol and progesterone concentration
Measured: Performed at oocyte retrieval, 10 days after retrieval, and at the time of serum pregnancy testing, i.e. 17 days after retrieval
Miscarriage Rate
Number of pregnancy losses before 20 weeks/number of clinical pregnancies
Measured: Assessed at 6 - 20 weeks gestation
Ectopic Pregnancy Rate
Number of ectopic pregnancies on ultrasound/number of clinical pregnancies
Measured: Assessed at 6 weeks gestation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2016
- Primary completionJun 2018 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (21)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for IVFStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 506 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- One Fertility
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. Evan Taerk, One Fertility
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02677259
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0564
- Status last verified
- Feb 2016
- First submitted
- 4 Feb 2016
- Last updated
- 10 Feb 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Jee BC, Suh CS, Kim SH, Kim YB, Moon SY. Effects of estradiol supplementation during the luteal phase of in vitro fertilization cycles: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2010 Feb;93(2):428-36. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.033. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
PubMed 19342034Smitz J, Devroey P, Camus M, Deschacht J, Khan I, Staessen C, Van Waesberghe L, Wisanto A, Van Steirteghem AC. The luteal phase and early pregnancy after combined GnRH-agonist/HMG treatment for superovulation in IVF or GIFT. Hum Reprod. 1988 Jul;3(5):585-90. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136750.
PubMed 3139698Smith EM, Anthony FW, Gadd SC, Masson GM. Trial of support treatment with human chorionic gonadotrophin in the luteal phase after treatment with buserelin and human menopausal gonadotrophin in women taking part in an in vitro fertilisation programme. BMJ. 1989 Jun 3;298(6686):1483-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6686.1483.
PubMed 2503080Belaisch-Allart J, De Mouzon J, Lapousterle C, Mayer M. The effect of HCG supplementation after combined GnRH agonist/HMG treatment in an IVF programme. Hum Reprod. 1990 Feb;5(2):163-6. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137062.
PubMed 2108990van der Linden M, Buckingham K, Farquhar C, Kremer JA, Metwally M. Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 7;2015(7):CD009154. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009154.pub3.
PubMed 26148507Fritz MA, Westfahl PK, Graham RL. The effect of luteal phase estrogen antagonism on endometrial development and luteal function in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1987 Nov;65(5):1006-13. doi: 10.1210/jcem-65-5-1006.
PubMed 3667871Goldstein D, Zuckerman H, Harpaz S, Barkai J, Geva A, Gordon S, Shalev E, Schwartz M. Correlation between estradiol and progesterone in cycles with luteal phase deficiency. Fertil Steril. 1982 Mar;37(3):348-54.
PubMed 7060785Ganesh A, Goswami S, Chattopadhyay R, Chakraborty C, Chaudhury K, Chakravarty BN. Luteal phase estradiol level: a potential predictive marker for successful pregnancy in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 2009 Apr;91(4):1018-22. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.074. Epub 2008 Mar 21.
PubMed 18359023Hutchinson-Williams KA, Lunenfeld B, Diamond MP, Lavy G, Boyers SP, DeCherney AH. Human chorionic gonadotropin, estradiol, and progesterone profiles in conception and nonconception cycles in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril. 1989 Sep;52(3):441-5. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60915-9.
PubMed 2776898Emperaire JC, Ruffie A, Audebert AJ, Verdaguer S. Early prognosis for IVF pregnancies through plasma oestrogens. Lancet. 1984 Nov 17;2(8412):1151. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)91577-0. No abstract available.
PubMed 6150201Sharara FI, McClamrock HD. Ratio of oestradiol concentration on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration to mid-luteal oestradiol concentration is predictive of in-vitro fertilization outcome. Hum Reprod. 1999 Nov;14(11):2777-82. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.11.2777.
PubMed 10548621Farhi J, Weissman A, Steinfeld Z, Shorer M, Nahum H, Levran D. Estradiol supplementation during the luteal phase may improve the pregnancy rate in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2000 Apr;73(4):761-6. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00632-9.
PubMed 10731538Lukaszuk K, Liss J, Lukaszuk M, Maj B. Optimization of estradiol supplementation during the luteal phase improves the pregnancy rate in women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2005 May;83(5):1372-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.11.055.
PubMed 15866571Var T, Tonguc EA, Doganay M, Gulerman C, Gungor T, Mollamahmutoglu L. A comparison of the effects of three different luteal phase support protocols on in vitro fertilization outcomes: a randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2011 Mar 1;95(3):985-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.057. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
PubMed 20674911Elgindy EA, El-Haieg DO, Mostafa MI, Shafiek M. Does luteal estradiol supplementation have a role in long agonist cycles? Fertil Steril. 2010 May 1;93(7):2182-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.066. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
PubMed 19243745
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Feb 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Luteal Phase Estradiol Support for In Vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles: a Randomized, Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02677259
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 0564
- Conditions
- IVF
- Keywords
- luteal phase, estradiol, pregnancy rate
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 506 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- One FertilityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2016
- Primary completion
- Jun 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Optimizing in vitro fertilization (IVF) success is more important than ever, in light of new public funding of IVF in Ontario, Canada. In patients undergoing IVF using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues, the luteal phase appears to be compromised, which may be a result of controlled-ovarian hyperstimulation, significant fluctuations in hormone levels, the impact of the oocyte retrieval process, or direct compromise of the corpus luteum. Progesterone support is definitely necessary during the luteal phase to facilitate implantation but whether estrogen supplementation is also needed remains unclear. The present study aims to determine whether estradiol support during the luteal phase improves clinical pregnancy rate in patients undergoing IVF.
Detailed description
Background:
It is well established that the luteal phase is compromised in IVF cycles using GnRH analogues. Use of GnRH agonists or antagonists results in decreased production of estrogen and progesterone, a decrease in luteal phase length, and impaired endogenous gonadotropin secretion caused by persistent pituitary suppression. While the benefits of progesterone support during the luteal phase of an IVF cycle are well established, the role of estrogen support during the luteal phase is less clear.
The corpus luteum produces both progesterone and estradiol in support of the endometrium for implantation. Estrogen produced during the luteal phase modulates the concentration of progesterone receptors within the secretory endometrium in an effort to maintain sufficient receptor concentrations for progesterone stimulation. Stewart et al. highlighted the importance of luteal phase serum estradiol concentration after observing a significant difference in midluteal serum estradiol concentration between conception and non-conception cycles. This observation appears to hold true in patients undergoing IVF as well. Shahara et al. demonstrated that, not only the absolute estradiol level, but also the magnitude of estradiol decline (as measured by the ratio of peak estradiol at the time of hCG administration to midluteal estradiol) was predictive of IVF success. These studies support the idea that luteal phase estradiol supplementation may be important to implantation and IVF success.
Studies investigating the effect of luteal phase estradiol supplementation have produced conflicting results. In a small randomized, controlled trial (RCT) by Farhi et al., IVF patients receiving both oral estradiol and vaginal progesterone luteal phase support achieved higher clinical pregnancy and implantation rates than patients received vaginal progesterone alone. Lukaszuk et al. confirmed these findings and found that the most significant benefit occurred at the highest dose of estradiol administered (6mg). Elgindy et al. observed a correlation between mid-luteal serum estradiol concentration and clinical pregnancy rates in patients receiving 6mg of oral estradiol15. Similar benefits of luteal phase estradiol support have been demonstrated in both vaginal and transdermal formulations.
Conversely, multiple older studies have failed to demonstrate a benefit of luteal phase estradiol support in IVF cycles. Lin et al., in a RCT of 402 patients undergoing IVF, found no benefit of luteal phase oral estradiol. This finding was supported by studies investigating both vaginal and transdermal formulations of luteal phase estradiol support. A recent meta-analysis also did not demonstrate a statistically significant benefit of luteal phase estradiol administration to IVF outcomes, though the common odds ratio was 1.18 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.41) with a p value of 0.07. Significant heterogeneity was observed between the included studies and the authors admit that more large-scale RCTs are needed to appropriately address this question.
Since these trials were done, there has been a major shift away from long GnRH agonist stimulation to short protocol GnRH antagonist use. All but three of the studies of luteal phase estradiol support have focused on IVF cycles using the old GnRH agonist protocols given the frequency of their application. The few studies using GnRH antagonist protocols have not shown a benefit of luteal phase estradiol support but these studies have been small in scale (total n=426) or failed to report on important outcomes such as clinical pregnancy rate. Both GnRH agonists and antagonists suppress pituitary gonadotropin production and lead to a luteal phase deficiency. GnRH antagonists appear to promote premature luteolysis causing a reduction in luteal phase length and ultimately decreased pregnancy rates. Given the frequency with which these protocols are now used in IVF, a large-scale study is greatly needed to address the role of estradiol luteal phase supplementation.
It is well established that the luteal phase in IVF cycles using GnRH analogues is compromised and some form of luteal phase support is required. Compelling evidence exists to support the use of luteal phase progesterone but the role of estradiol remains controversial. Most of the existing studies are small in size and lack sufficient power. Few studies exist to determine the role of estrogen supplementation in GnRH antagonist IVF cycles. This well-powered RCT will address this important clinical question.
Methods:
Design: This is a single center RCT, conducted at ONE Fertility Burlington.
Inclusion criteria: Indications for IVF/ICSI include male factor, diminished ovarian reserve, tubal factor, ovulatory dysfunction and unexplained infertility. Female age will be 42 years or less.
IVF protocol: A short, GnRH antagonist protocol will be used for all patients. Starting on cycle day 3, ovarian stimulation will be performed using a combination of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (Puregon, Ferring, or; Gonal-F, EMD Serono), medications mimicking luteinizing hormone (LH) activity, i.e recombinant human choriogonadotropin (hCG, Ferring) and/or medications containing both FSH and LH (Menopur, Ferring). Medications will be dosed according to the patient's diagnosis and ovarian reserve measurements. Follicular development will be monitored with serial transvaginal ultrasounds, and serum estradiol, progesterone and LH concentrations. A GnRH antagonist (Orgalutran, EMD Serono) will be commenced for pituitary suppression between cycle day 6 to 9. Oocyte retrieval will be performed 36 hours after administration of choriogonadotropin alpha (Ovidrel, EMD Serono), or a GnRH agonist (Decapeptyl, Ferring), to complete oocyte maturation once a sufficient cohort of mature follicles has been identified. A maximum of 2 embryos will be transferred on either day 3 or day 5 following oocyte retrieval. Serum beta hCG measurement will be performed 17 days after oocyte retrieval and, if positive, clinical pregnancy will be confirmed every 2 weeks commencing at 6 weeks gestation until 12 weeks gestation.
Recruitment and Randomization: Recruitment will occur and informed consent will be obtained at the time of treatment consent. Participants will be randomized at the time of recruitment by way of numbered, sealed envelopes to receive either 17-beta estradiol 3 mg PO/PV BID plus micronized progesterone 200 mg PV TID (treatment group) or micronized progesterone alone (control group) for luteal support commencing the day after oocyte retrieval. 17-beta estradiol will be continued until the time of pregnancy testing and, if β-hCG is positive, until 6 weeks gestation (4 weeks total). Progesterone will be continued until the time of pregnancy testing and, if β-hCG is positive, until 10 weeks gestation (8 weeks total). There will be no blinding to group allocation and no placebo. Subjects will be assigned a unique subject number prior to data analysis in order to avoid the use of any identifying information. Data will be collected using a standardized patient data form in a secure computerized database.
Outcomes: The primary outcome is clinical pregnancy, defined as the presence of fetal heart activity on ultrasound at or beyond 6 weeks gestation. Secondary outcomes include ongoing pregnancy rate (number of clinical pregnancies on ultrasound continuing beyond 12 weeks gestation/number of clinical pregnancies), implantation rate (number of clinical pregnancies/number of embryos transferred), luteal phase serum estradiol and progesterone concentration (performed at oocyte retrieval, 10 days after retrieval, and at the time of serum pregnancy testing, i.e. 17 days after retrieval), miscarriage rate (number of pregnancy losses before 20 weeks/number of clinical pregnancies) and ectopic pregnancy rate (number of ectopic pregnancies on ultrasound/number of clinical pregnancies).
Data Analysis: Descriptive analyses will be performed using SPSS software (IBM Corp., Version 22). Associations between categorical variables will be analyzed using a combination of Chi-square and Fisher's Exact tests. Associations between continuous variables will be analyzed using a combination of independent sample t-tests and logistic regression.
Sample Size Calculation: Based on a sample size calculation with assumptions of ß = 80%, α = 0.05 and an effect size of 25% in clinical pregnancy rate, a total of 506 subjects (253 per arm) will need to be recruited. This is feasible within this center over a two-year period or less, based on the current number of stimulated cycles per year of 360 and a high rate of compliance and patient interest in the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Estradiol + Standard Luteal Phase Support | Experimental | Drug: 17-beta estradiol, Drug: Micronized progesterone1. 17-beta estradiol 3 mg PO/PV BID from day of oocyte retrieval until 6 weeks gestation 2. Micronized progesterone 200 mg PV TID from day of oocyte retrieval until 10 weeks gestation |
| Standard Luteal Phase Support | Active comparator | Drug: Micronized progesterone1. Micronized progesterone 200 mg PV TID from day of oocyte retrieval until 10 weeks gestation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 42 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Indications for IVF/ICSI include male factor, diminished ovarian reserve, tubal factor, ovulatory dysfunction and unexplained infertility.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- none
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 17-beta estradiolAlso: Estrace | Drug | Estradiol + Standard Luteal Phase Support |
| Micronized progesteroneAlso: Endometrin | Drug | Estradiol + Standard Luteal Phase Support, Standard Luteal Phase Support |
Primary outcome
Clinical Pregnancy
Time frame: Assessed at 6 weeks gestation
Presence of fetal heart activity on ultrasound at or beyond 6 weeks gestation.
5 secondary outcomes
Ongoing Pregnancy Rate
Time frame: Assessed at 12+1 weeks gestation
Implantation Rate
Time frame: Assessed at 6 weeks gestation
Luteal phase serum estradiol and progesterone concentration
Time frame: Performed at oocyte retrieval, 10 days after retrieval, and at the time of serum pregnancy testing, i.e. 17 days after retrieval
Miscarriage Rate
Time frame: Assessed at 6 - 20 weeks gestation
Ectopic Pregnancy Rate
Time frame: Assessed at 6 weeks gestation
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Feb 2016.
- Background: PubMed 19342034Jee BC, Suh CS, Kim SH, Kim YB, Moon SY. Effects of estradiol supplementation during the luteal phase of in vitro fertilization cycles: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2010 Feb;93(2):428-36. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.033. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
- Background: PubMed 3139698Smitz J, Devroey P, Camus M, Deschacht J, Khan I, Staessen C, Van Waesberghe L, Wisanto A, Van Steirteghem AC. The luteal phase and early pregnancy after combined GnRH-agonist/HMG treatment for superovulation in IVF or GIFT. Hum Reprod. 1988 Jul;3(5):585-90. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136750.
- Background: PubMed 2503080Smith EM, Anthony FW, Gadd SC, Masson GM. Trial of support treatment with human chorionic gonadotrophin in the luteal phase after treatment with buserelin and human menopausal gonadotrophin in women taking part in an in vitro fertilisation programme. BMJ. 1989 Jun 3;298(6686):1483-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6686.1483.
- Background: PubMed 2108990Belaisch-Allart J, De Mouzon J, Lapousterle C, Mayer M. The effect of HCG supplementation after combined GnRH agonist/HMG treatment in an IVF programme. Hum Reprod. 1990 Feb;5(2):163-6. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137062.
- Background: PubMed 26148507van der Linden M, Buckingham K, Farquhar C, Kremer JA, Metwally M. Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 7;2015(7):CD009154. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009154.pub3.
- Background: PubMed 3667871Fritz MA, Westfahl PK, Graham RL. The effect of luteal phase estrogen antagonism on endometrial development and luteal function in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1987 Nov;65(5):1006-13. doi: 10.1210/jcem-65-5-1006.
- Background: PubMed 7060785Goldstein D, Zuckerman H, Harpaz S, Barkai J, Geva A, Gordon S, Shalev E, Schwartz M. Correlation between estradiol and progesterone in cycles with luteal phase deficiency. Fertil Steril. 1982 Mar;37(3):348-54.
- Background: PubMed 18359023Ganesh A, Goswami S, Chattopadhyay R, Chakraborty C, Chaudhury K, Chakravarty BN. Luteal phase estradiol level: a potential predictive marker for successful pregnancy in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 2009 Apr;91(4):1018-22. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.074. Epub 2008 Mar 21.
- Background: PubMed 2776898Hutchinson-Williams KA, Lunenfeld B, Diamond MP, Lavy G, Boyers SP, DeCherney AH. Human chorionic gonadotropin, estradiol, and progesterone profiles in conception and nonconception cycles in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril. 1989 Sep;52(3):441-5. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60915-9.
- Background: PubMed 6150201Emperaire JC, Ruffie A, Audebert AJ, Verdaguer S. Early prognosis for IVF pregnancies through plasma oestrogens. Lancet. 1984 Nov 17;2(8412):1151. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)91577-0. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 10548621Sharara FI, McClamrock HD. Ratio of oestradiol concentration on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration to mid-luteal oestradiol concentration is predictive of in-vitro fertilization outcome. Hum Reprod. 1999 Nov;14(11):2777-82. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.11.2777.
- Background: PubMed 10731538Farhi J, Weissman A, Steinfeld Z, Shorer M, Nahum H, Levran D. Estradiol supplementation during the luteal phase may improve the pregnancy rate in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2000 Apr;73(4):761-6. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00632-9.
Related trials for IVF
RecruitingObservational study
International Pilot Study for Dual Non-invasive Assesment of Embryo Development
Infertility
RecruitingObservational study
Pilot Study of Discarded Blastocysts
Infertility (IVF Patients)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Human Menopausal Gonadotropin Research in Infertility Assessing Cumulative Live Birth With Frozen Embryo Transfer.
Infertility (IVF Patients)
RecruitingPhase 2
Ubiquinone vs. Ubiquinol Supplementation
IVF
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Opt-IVF for Personalized Medicine for Normal Responders
Ivf
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing 17-beta estradiol and Micronized progesterone in people with IVF, run by One Fertility.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Evan Taerk, MD,MSc (4167372033, evantaerk@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinical Pregnancy (time frame: Assessed at 6 weeks gestation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02677259, which also lists 21 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2016.