Ureteral PatencyPhase 4NCT02677623
Evaluation of Ureteral Patency in the Post-indigo Carmine Era
A Phase 4 study testing Pyridium, Sodium Fluorescein and Mannitol in people with Ureteral Patency, run by Columbia University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Many gynecologic, urologic and pelvic reconstructive surgeries require accurate ways to identify the opening of the ureters to ensure that they are working correctly. Historically, indigo carmine, an intravenous medication that dyes the urine blue, has been used to help visualize the opening of the ureters with… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Ureteral Patency
- What is being tested?
- Pyridium, Sodium Fluorescein and Mannitol
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 140 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2015to Aug 2016
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Planned cystoscopy
Who cannot join
- Women who are pregnant
- Women with contraindications to pyridium, sodium fluorescein or mannitol:
- Intra-operative administration of nitric oxide, prilocaine and sodium nitrite
- Anuria
- Women with creatinine greater than 1 or Cr Cl < 50ml/minute
- Known allergy to pyridium, sodium fluorescein or mannitol.
- Women with a known urologic anatomical anomaly
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032
About this study
Many gynecologic, urologic and pelvic reconstructive surgeries require accurate ways to identify the opening of the ureters to ensure that they are working correctly. Historically, indigo carmine, an intravenous medication that dyes the urine blue, has been used to help visualize the opening of the ureters with cystoscopy which is a camera placed inside the bladder. In June 2014, the FDA announced there was current shortage of indigo carmine. Thus, investigators need to evaluate other methods for assessing ureteral patency. Ideal alternatives are agents that are low-risk, inexpensive, provide comparable visualization, are readily available and are easy to use.
Examples of such agents currently being used to evaluate the ureters, include oral pyridium, IV sodium fluorescein, and mannitol. These agents help identify the opening of the ureters by either dyeing the urine a different color such as pyridium and sodium fluorescein, or by having a different viscosity to urine such as mannitol. This study will compare three methods of evaluating ureteral patency at time of cystoscopy compared to no method: mannitol, sodium fluorescein, and pyridium.
Read the detailed description
Many gynecologic, urologic and pelvic reconstructive surgeries require accurate intra-operative evaluation of ureteral patency. Numerous studies show that cystoscopy detects a greater proportion of bladder and ureteral injuries than visual inspection alone.The rate of ureteral injury in gynecologic surgery ranges from 0.6 to 11% when discovered on routine intraoperative cystoscopy depending on the procedure. In a review by Gilmour et al, the incidence of bladder injury in studies performing routine cystoscopy was 4-fold higher than those studies that did not. Early recognition of injury and repair during the primary surgery most often results in less morbidity for the patient, more successful outcome, and increased ease of repair.
Cystourethroscopy is a surgical procedure in which a fiberoptic endoscope is introduced through the urethra to examine the entire lumen of the urethra and bladder for diseases or abnormalities in a systematic manner.There are numerous indications for diagnostic cystourethroscopy during gynecologic surgery. The most important indications are to rule out cystotomy and intravesical or intraurethral suture or mesh placement, verify bilateral ureteral jets to ensure patency, and evaluate a suspected urine leak during or after laparotomy, laparoscopy or vaginal surgery.
Historically, indigo carmine, indigotindisulfonate sodium has been used to assist with cystourethroscopy. Ureteral function is assessed by visualization of ureteral efflux of blue dye after the intravenous injection of indigo carmine. Indigo carmine has many advantages. These include no known drug interactions or metabolites, easy dosing of 40mg or 5 to 10 cc of 0.8% solution, changing urine to a non-physiologic blue color that eases visualization and the ability to give the medication intravenously immediately prior to the procedure. In patients with normal renal function and adequate hydration, the dye is visible after approximately ten minutes, having a half-life of four to five minutes. Because of its large molecular size, it is largely excreted rather than reabsorbed. There are few contraindications to use of indigo carmine. It should be used with caution in patients with cardiovascular diseases secondary to its mild pressor effect.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced the current shortage of indigotindisulfonate sodium in June 2014. This is due to the inability to obtain the active agent. There are two suppliers of indigo carmine in the United States: Akron and American Regent. Akron has discontinued manufacturing indigo carmine with no plan to resume production. American Regent plans to continue manufacturing indigo carmine based on component availability.
Methylene blue is an alternative to indigo carmine. Like indigo carmine, it can be given intravenously. However, it does have some risks. Methylene blue is variably metabolized to multiple end products but is largely metabolized to leukomethylene, which is colorless and therefore, may not be visualized in the urine. It cannot be used in pregnant patients and those with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency because of risk of inducing hemolytic anemia. It may also cause methemoglobinemia when given in high doses greater than 7mg/kg. Lastly, methylene blue is a monoamine oxidase inhibitor and can cause serotonin syndrome in patients taking other serotonergic agents.
Given the shortage of indigo carmine and the risks associated with use of methylene blue, investigators need to evaluate other methods for assessing ureteral patency. Ideal alternatives are agents that are low-risk, inexpensive, provide comparable visualization, are readily available, and are easy to use. Preoperative oral phenazopyridine and intravenous urelle and sodium fluorescein are other agents that can dye the urine. The use and safety profile of oral phenazopyridine as a bladder analgesic is well established when used for a single short course. Within one hour after ingestion, the urine acquires a characteristic orange tint. A recent study by Hui et al showed that bilateral ureteral patency and bladder mucosal integrity was confirmed in all cases of 124 women that received oral phenazopyridine prior to pelvic surgery. Phenazopyridine is a safe, inexpensive dye that assists effectively in the confirmation of ureteric patency when cystoscopy is planned during pelvic surgery. Consistent with the literature, pyridium has been used at our institution for visualization of the ureters. Some reported concerns include obscuring of the bladder mucosa and a striking similarity between bloody ureteral efflux and pyridium-dyed urine that can be alarming intra-operatively. Doyle et al used sodium fluorescein as an alternative to indigo carmine to assess ureteral patency. This study found that ten percent sodium fluorescein given intravenously in doses ranging from 0.25 to 1.0 cc results in good visualization of ureteral jets. Sodium fluorescein injections have been routinely used for retinal angiography using significantly higher doses than cystoscopy requires. They have proven to be safe and cost effective. A prospective study measuring adverse reactions in patients undergoing ophthalmic angiography found the most common reactions to be nausea (2.9%), vomiting (1.2%) and flushing or rash (0.5%).Mannitol is a low-viscosity, isotonic distending media that is commonly used during hysteroscopy. As the viscosity is different than that of urine, it may allow for better visualization of the flow of urine during cystoscopy. It provides excellent visibility for the endoscopic surgeon but also possesses properties that have a potential impact on patient safety. Five percent mannitol is typically used during transurethral resection or hysteroscopy. Excess mannitol absorption has been known to cause hyponatremia; however, this is an uncommon event. The severity of hyponatremia is directly related to the volume of irrigation fluid that is retained. Absorption greater than 1000mL is typically required to cause clinically significant hyponatremia. In this study, investigators will use only 300mL of mannitol to distend the bladder. Therefore, the risk of hyponatremia is minimal.
- Conditions
- Ureteral Patency
- Being tested
- Pyridium, Sodium Fluorescein, Mannitol, Normal Saline
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PyridiumDrug
Sodium FluoresceinDrug
MannitolDrug
Normal SalineOther
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A- Pyridium | Experimental | * Method of administration: oral
* Dose: 200 mg PO with small sip of water
* Known adverse events: yellow discoloration of skin or sclera, 1-10% central nervous system effects including headache and dizziness, GI effect of cramping, < 1% acute renal failure, methemoglobinemia, hemolytic anemia, hepatitis, rash, skin pigmentation, vertigo, stomach cramps
* Contraindications: to be used in caution in patients with renal impairment Cr Cl < 50ml/minute and in patients who are receiving nitric oxide, prilocaine and sodium nitrite as it can cause methemoglobinemia Receives: Drug: Pyridium |
| B- Sodium Fluorescein | Experimental | * Method of administration: intravenous
* Dose: 25 mg
* Known adverse events: nausea, vomiting, flushing or rash, hypersensitivity and anaphylactic reactions can occur following injection and immediate treatment with epinephrine should be available, skin and urine discoloration (urine may appear bright yellow for 24-36 hours), extravasation may cause skin sloughing, toxic neuritis and phlebitis, nausea, rare cardiac arrest and seizure,
* Contraindications: use with caution in patients with history of hypersensitivity, allergies or asthma Receives: Drug: Sodium Fluorescein |
| C- Mannitol | Experimental | * Method of administration: irrigant during cystoscopy
* Dose: 300cc during cystoscopy to visualize the ureters
* Known adverse events: dysuria, polyuria, hyponatremia with excess absorption, potential increased risk of urinary tract infection
* Contraindications when used as a genitourinary irrigation solution: anuria Receives: Drug: Mannitol |
| Control- Normal saline | Experimental | * Method of administration: irrigant during cystoscopy
* Dose: 300cc
* Known adverse events: no known significant adverse events
* Contraindications: none Receives: Other: Normal Saline |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
This is a 10-cm visual analog scale to determine which method of evaluating ureteral patency is most satisfactory to physicians. The smiley face is at one end and the frowning face is at the other end. Smiling is 1 and frowning is 10. The scale is completed by surgeon, anesthesiologist and the circulator by placing an "x" or a "mark" anywhere on the 10 cm line towards how good and or bad each person felt about the of process of patency assessment that was used. Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity (worse outcome).
Measured: Intraoperative
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2015
- Primary completionAug 2016
- Study completionAug 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Ureteral PatencyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Columbia UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 140 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Columbia University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Cara Grimes, MD, Principal investigator, Columbia University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02677623
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AAAP3450
- Status last verified
- May 2019
- First submitted
- 4 Feb 2016
- Last updated
- 30 May 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 May 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Ureteral Patency in the Post-indigo Carmine Era
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02677623
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AAAP3450
- Conditions
- Ureteral Patency
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 140 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Columbia UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2015
- Primary completion
- Aug 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 30 May 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Many gynecologic, urologic and pelvic reconstructive surgeries require accurate ways to identify the opening of the ureters to ensure that they are working correctly. Historically, indigo carmine, an intravenous medication that dyes the urine blue, has been used to help visualize the opening of the ureters with cystoscopy which is a camera placed inside the bladder. In June 2014, the FDA announced there was current shortage of indigo carmine. Thus, investigators need to evaluate other methods for assessing ureteral patency. Ideal alternatives are agents that are low-risk, inexpensive, provide comparable visualization, are readily available and are easy to use.
Examples of such agents currently being used to evaluate the ureters, include oral pyridium, IV sodium fluorescein, and mannitol. These agents help identify the opening of the ureters by either dyeing the urine a different color such as pyridium and sodium fluorescein, or by having a different viscosity to urine such as mannitol. This study will compare three methods of evaluating ureteral patency at time of cystoscopy compared to no method: mannitol, sodium fluorescein, and pyridium.
Detailed description
Many gynecologic, urologic and pelvic reconstructive surgeries require accurate intra-operative evaluation of ureteral patency. Numerous studies show that cystoscopy detects a greater proportion of bladder and ureteral injuries than visual inspection alone.The rate of ureteral injury in gynecologic surgery ranges from 0.6 to 11% when discovered on routine intraoperative cystoscopy depending on the procedure. In a review by Gilmour et al, the incidence of bladder injury in studies performing routine cystoscopy was 4-fold higher than those studies that did not. Early recognition of injury and repair during the primary surgery most often results in less morbidity for the patient, more successful outcome, and increased ease of repair.
Cystourethroscopy is a surgical procedure in which a fiberoptic endoscope is introduced through the urethra to examine the entire lumen of the urethra and bladder for diseases or abnormalities in a systematic manner.There are numerous indications for diagnostic cystourethroscopy during gynecologic surgery. The most important indications are to rule out cystotomy and intravesical or intraurethral suture or mesh placement, verify bilateral ureteral jets to ensure patency, and evaluate a suspected urine leak during or after laparotomy, laparoscopy or vaginal surgery.
Historically, indigo carmine, indigotindisulfonate sodium has been used to assist with cystourethroscopy. Ureteral function is assessed by visualization of ureteral efflux of blue dye after the intravenous injection of indigo carmine. Indigo carmine has many advantages. These include no known drug interactions or metabolites, easy dosing of 40mg or 5 to 10 cc of 0.8% solution, changing urine to a non-physiologic blue color that eases visualization and the ability to give the medication intravenously immediately prior to the procedure. In patients with normal renal function and adequate hydration, the dye is visible after approximately ten minutes, having a half-life of four to five minutes. Because of its large molecular size, it is largely excreted rather than reabsorbed. There are few contraindications to use of indigo carmine. It should be used with caution in patients with cardiovascular diseases secondary to its mild pressor effect.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced the current shortage of indigotindisulfonate sodium in June 2014. This is due to the inability to obtain the active agent. There are two suppliers of indigo carmine in the United States: Akron and American Regent. Akron has discontinued manufacturing indigo carmine with no plan to resume production. American Regent plans to continue manufacturing indigo carmine based on component availability.
Methylene blue is an alternative to indigo carmine. Like indigo carmine, it can be given intravenously. However, it does have some risks. Methylene blue is variably metabolized to multiple end products but is largely metabolized to leukomethylene, which is colorless and therefore, may not be visualized in the urine. It cannot be used in pregnant patients and those with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency because of risk of inducing hemolytic anemia. It may also cause methemoglobinemia when given in high doses greater than 7mg/kg. Lastly, methylene blue is a monoamine oxidase inhibitor and can cause serotonin syndrome in patients taking other serotonergic agents.
Given the shortage of indigo carmine and the risks associated with use of methylene blue, investigators need to evaluate other methods for assessing ureteral patency. Ideal alternatives are agents that are low-risk, inexpensive, provide comparable visualization, are readily available, and are easy to use. Preoperative oral phenazopyridine and intravenous urelle and sodium fluorescein are other agents that can dye the urine. The use and safety profile of oral phenazopyridine as a bladder analgesic is well established when used for a single short course. Within one hour after ingestion, the urine acquires a characteristic orange tint. A recent study by Hui et al showed that bilateral ureteral patency and bladder mucosal integrity was confirmed in all cases of 124 women that received oral phenazopyridine prior to pelvic surgery. Phenazopyridine is a safe, inexpensive dye that assists effectively in the confirmation of ureteric patency when cystoscopy is planned during pelvic surgery. Consistent with the literature, pyridium has been used at our institution for visualization of the ureters. Some reported concerns include obscuring of the bladder mucosa and a striking similarity between bloody ureteral efflux and pyridium-dyed urine that can be alarming intra-operatively. Doyle et al used sodium fluorescein as an alternative to indigo carmine to assess ureteral patency. This study found that ten percent sodium fluorescein given intravenously in doses ranging from 0.25 to 1.0 cc results in good visualization of ureteral jets. Sodium fluorescein injections have been routinely used for retinal angiography using significantly higher doses than cystoscopy requires. They have proven to be safe and cost effective. A prospective study measuring adverse reactions in patients undergoing ophthalmic angiography found the most common reactions to be nausea (2.9%), vomiting (1.2%) and flushing or rash (0.5%).Mannitol is a low-viscosity, isotonic distending media that is commonly used during hysteroscopy. As the viscosity is different than that of urine, it may allow for better visualization of the flow of urine during cystoscopy. It provides excellent visibility for the endoscopic surgeon but also possesses properties that have a potential impact on patient safety. Five percent mannitol is typically used during transurethral resection or hysteroscopy. Excess mannitol absorption has been known to cause hyponatremia; however, this is an uncommon event. The severity of hyponatremia is directly related to the volume of irrigation fluid that is retained. Absorption greater than 1000mL is typically required to cause clinically significant hyponatremia. In this study, investigators will use only 300mL of mannitol to distend the bladder. Therefore, the risk of hyponatremia is minimal.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A- Pyridium | Experimental | Drug: Pyridium* Method of administration: oral * Dose: 200 mg PO with small sip of water * Known adverse events: yellow discoloration of skin or sclera, 1-10% central nervous system effects including headache and dizziness, GI effect of cramping, < 1% acute renal failure, methemoglobinemia, hemolytic anemia, hepatitis, rash, skin pigmentation, vertigo, stomach cramps * Contraindications: to be used in caution in patients with renal impairment Cr Cl < 50ml/minute and in patients who are receiving nitric oxide, prilocaine and sodium nitrite as it can cause methemoglobinemia |
| B- Sodium Fluorescein | Experimental | Drug: Sodium Fluorescein* Method of administration: intravenous * Dose: 25 mg * Known adverse events: nausea, vomiting, flushing or rash, hypersensitivity and anaphylactic reactions can occur following injection and immediate treatment with epinephrine should be available, skin and urine discoloration (urine may appear bright yellow for 24-36 hours), extravasation may cause skin sloughing, toxic neuritis and phlebitis, nausea, rare cardiac arrest and seizure, * Contraindications: use with caution in patients with history of hypersensitivity, allergies or asthma |
| C- Mannitol | Experimental | Drug: Mannitol* Method of administration: irrigant during cystoscopy * Dose: 300cc during cystoscopy to visualize the ureters * Known adverse events: dysuria, polyuria, hyponatremia with excess absorption, potential increased risk of urinary tract infection * Contraindications when used as a genitourinary irrigation solution: anuria |
| Control- Normal saline | Experimental | Other: Normal Saline* Method of administration: irrigant during cystoscopy * Dose: 300cc * Known adverse events: no known significant adverse events * Contraindications: none |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Planned cystoscopy
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Women who are pregnant
- Women with contraindications to pyridium, sodium fluorescein or mannitol:
- Women with a known urologic anatomical anomaly
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Pyridium | Drug | A- Pyridium |
| Sodium Fluorescein | Drug | B- Sodium Fluorescein |
| Mannitol | Drug | C- Mannitol |
| Normal Saline | Other | Control- Normal saline |
Primary outcome
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: Intraoperative
This is a 10-cm visual analog scale to determine which method of evaluating ureteral patency is most satisfactory to physicians. The smiley face is at one end and the frowning face is at the other end. Smiling is 1 and frowning is 10. The scale is completed by surgeon, anesthesiologist and the circulator by placing an "x" or a "mark" anywhere on the 10 cm line towards how good and or bad each person felt about the of process of patency assessment that was used. Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity (worse outcome).
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 May 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Ureteral Patency
RecruitingPhase 4
Indigotindisulfonate Sodium as an Aid in Determination of Ureteral Patency in Patient's With Renal Impairment
Ureter Injury
RecruitingPhase 1
FORAGER-1: A Study of Vepugratinib (LY3866288; LOXO-435) in Participants With Cancer With a Change in a Gene Called FGFR3
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Neoplasm Metastasis
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Indigotindisulfonate Sodium Injection, USP as an Aid in the Determination of Ureteral Patency in Pediatric Patients
Ureter Injury
RecruitingPhase 3
Comparison of Alpha Blockers (Terazosin and Tamsulosin) in Reducing Ureteral Stent Related Symptoms
Stent Related Symptoms
RecruitingPhase 2
Neoadjuvant Tislelizumab + Nab-Paclitaxel Followed by Distal Ureterectomy for Ureteral Cancer
Ureteral Cancer, Neoadjuvant Therapy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Cara Grimes, MD principal investigator
Columbia University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Pyridium, Sodium Fluorescein and Mannitol in people with Ureteral Patency, run by Columbia University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 May 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (time frame: Intraoperative). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 May 2019.