AzTrials
AzTrials

Colonic PolypsNCT02678663

Injection-Assisted Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Small Colorectal Polyps

A study testing Injection-assisted Cold Snare Polypectomy and Endoscopic Mucosal Resection in people with Colonic Polyps, run by Benizelion General Hospital at 2 sites in Greece.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Complete resection of neoplastic polyps is pivotal, as 8.8% to 50% of interval cancers may arise as a consequence of incomplete polypectomy. However, the ideal method to remove small colorectal polyps remains uncertain. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Colonic Polyps
What is being tested?
Injection-assisted Cold Snare Polypectomy and Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
164 participants
Where
2 sitesGreece
Study dates
Jan 2016to Jan 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects over the age of 18 years who agree informed consent and who have at least one polyp of eligible size (6-10mm)

Who cannot join

  • Anticoagulant therapy during the past 1 week of the procedure
  • Known coagulopathy
  • History of liver cirrhosis, chronic kidney disease, malignancy, inflammatory bowel disease, significant infectious disease, polyposis syndrome

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Greece2 sites
  • Benizelion General Hospital

    Heraklion, Crete, 71409

  • Konstantopoulio General Hospital

    Nea Ionia, Athens, 14233

Other trials in Greece

About this study

Official title: Randomized Comparison of Injection-Assisted Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Small (6-10mm) Colorectal Polyps

Complete resection of neoplastic polyps is pivotal, as 8.8% to 50% of interval cancers may arise as a consequence of incomplete polypectomy. However, the ideal method to remove small colorectal polyps remains uncertain. The investigators designed a randomized controlled trial to assess whether injection-assisted cold snare polypectomy may be noninferior to EMR for the resection of small (6-10mm) colorectal polyps.

Read the detailed description

Polypectomy is the basis of colorectal cancer prevention by interrupting the adenoma-to-carcinoma sequence. Most of the polypectomies are performed for diminutive (≤5mm) or small (6-10mm) colorectal lesions which represent >90% of the overall burden of resected polyps. Although the potential for neoplasia is usually size-dependent, recent evidence suggested that even diminutive and small polyps harbor a substantial risk of advanced neoplasia (in some series as high as 9-10%). Complete resection of neoplastic polyps is pivotal, as 8.8% to 50% of interval cancers may arise as a consequence of incomplete polypectomy. However, the ideal method to remove small colorectal polyps remains uncertain. Cold snare polypectomy has become standard technique allowing for comprehensive and safe resection of diminutive polyps, though significant incomplete resection rates have challenged the implementation of CSP for larger (in particular 8-10mm) polyps. Submucosal injection of a solution containing a staining dye could improve the outcome of cold snare polypectomy: a) lift of the lesion with submucosal chromoendoscopy could sharply delineate margins and facilitate capture and removal by using a cold snare, and b) formation of a submucosal cushion could minimize mechanical damage to the submucosal vessels, preventing the occurrence of immediate bleeding.

Use of electrocautery is believed to reduce the risk of incomplete resection, although it is less attractive from a safety standpoint due to the risk of complications including delayed bleeding, post-polypectomy syndrome and perforation. Injection of a submucosal solution in order to lift the lesion (injection-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection, EMR) facilitates "hot" resection of sessile or flat neoplasms and allows for a deeper resection margin as compared to conventional polypectomy, while it minimizes electrocautery damage by creating a safety cushion. Despite it is highly efficient, EMR still carries a substantial risk of complications (in most series 7-8%) which has generally limited uptake of the technique among endoscopists for the removal of small polyps.

Therefore, the investigators designed a randomized controlled trial to assess whether injection-assisted cold snare polypectomy may be noninferior to EMR for the resection of small (6-10mm) colorectal polyps.

METHODS

The study will be conducted in the endoscopy units of the Benizelion General Hospital (Heraklion, Crete, Greece) and the Konstantopoulio General Hospital (Nea Ionia, Athens, Greece). Consecutive subjects over the age of 18 years who agree informed consent and who have at least one polyp of eligible size (6-10mm) will be randomly assigned in two groups:

  1. Injection-assisted cold snare polypectomy (I-CSP). Polyps in this group will be resected with the cold snare technique after pre-lift of the lesion with a submucosal injection of methylene blue-tinted normal saline solution. The polyp and a small rim of normal tissue will be then snared closely and removed in a single piece without the use of electrocautery.
  2. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). Polyps in this group will be removed in a single piece by using an "inject-and-cut" EMR technique. Methylene blue-tinted normal saline solution will be injected into the submucosal space followed by the application of snare cautery for lesion resection.

All polypectomy specimens will be retrieved by suctioning into a polyp trap or by using retrieval forceps and send for histopathological examination.

The polypectomy site will be rinsed with tap water and carefully inspected for residual polyp. Targeted biopsies will be obtained from any areas in the polypectomy site margin suspicious for residual tissue. Protrusions in the polypectomy base after I-CSP will be recorded and a biopsy will be taken for separate histological assessment.

Histological evaluation of polypectomy specimens and post-polypectomy biopsy specimens will rely on the criteria of the World Health Organization and will be performed by experienced GI pathologists blinded to the polytectomy technique used and the endoscopic findings.

Conditions
Colonic Polyps
Being tested
Injection-assisted Cold Snare Polypectomy, Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
Keywords
Colon polyp, Polypectomy, Cold snare, Endoscopic mucosal resection
Medical subject headings
Colonic Polyps

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Injection-assisted Cold Snare PolypectomyProcedure or surgery

    Resection of a polyp after blue-tinted saline injection using a cold snare (without application of electrocautery)

  • Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionProcedure or surgery

    Resection of a polyp after blue-tinted saline injection using snare electrocautery

Study groups in NCT02678663
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Injection-assisted cold snare polypectomy (I-CSP)ExperimentalPolyps in this group will be resected with the cold snare technique after pre-lift of the lesion with a submucosal injection of methylene blue-tinted normal saline solution. The polyp and a small rim of normal tissue will be then snared closely and removed in a single piece without the use of electrocautery.
Receives: Procedure: Injection-assisted Cold Snare Polypectomy
Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR).Active comparatorPolyps in this group will be removed in a single piece by using an "inject-and-cut" EMR technique. Methylene blue-tinted normal saline solution will be injected into the submucosal space followed by the application of snare cautery for lesion resection.
Receives: Procedure: Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Complete Resection Rate

    Measured: Two weeks after each polypectomy

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Incidence of complications (intraprocedural bleeding, postprocedural bleeding, post-polypectomy syndrome, perforation).

    Measured: Two weeks after each polypectomy

  2. Necessity of hemostasis (due to intraprocedural or postprocedural bleeding)

    Measured: Two weeks after each polypectomy

  3. Polyp retrieval rate

    Measured: Two weeks after each polypectomy

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Feb 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2016
  3. Primary completionNov 2016
  4. Study completionJan 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
164 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02678663
Sponsor's protocol ID
1513/3.2.2016
Status last verified
Jan 2017
First submitted
3 Feb 2016
Last updated
31 Jan 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Papastergiou V, Paraskeva KD, Fragaki M, Dimas I, Vardas E, Theodoropoulou A, Mathou N, Giannakopoulos A, Karmiris K, Mpitouli A, Apessou D, Giannikaki L, Karagiannis JA, Chlouverakis G, Paspatis GA. Cold versus hot endoscopic mucosal resection for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps sized 6-10 mm: a randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2018 Apr;50(4):403-411. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-118594. Epub 2017 Sep 12.

    PubMed 28898922

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Injection-assisted Cold Snare Polypectomy and Endoscopic Mucosal Resection in people with Colonic Polyps, run by Benizelion General Hospital at 2 sites in Greece.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Greece. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Complete Resection Rate (time frame: Two weeks after each polypectomy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02678663, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jan 2017.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in