Breast CancerPhase 4NCT02679755
Palbociclib In Combination With Letrozole As Treatment Of Post-Menopausal Women With HR+, HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer
A Phase 4 study testing Palbociclib and Letrozole in people with Breast Cancer, run by Pfizer at 34 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
A study of palbociclib in combination with letrozole as treatment of post-menopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, her2-negative advanced breast cancer for whom letrozole therapy is deemed appropriate. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Palbociclib and Letrozole
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 252 participants
- Where
- 34 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 9 Mar 2016to 25 Jul 2019
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Post-menopausal women (>=18 years of age) with proven diagnosis of advanced carcinoma of the breast (ER(+) and/or PgR(+) and HER2(-)) who are appropriate for letrozole therapy (in the first-line advanced/metastatic disease setting).
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2.
- Adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function.
Who cannot join
- Prior treatment with any CDK inhibitor .
- QTc >480 msec; history of QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome or known history of QTc prolongation, or Torsade de Pointes.
- High cardiovascular risk, including, but not limited to myocardial infarction, severe/unstable angina, severe cardiac dysrhythmias, and symptomatic pulmonary embolism in the past 6 months of enrollment.
Trial locations and contacts
34 sites in 2 countries.
34 sites in 2 countries
Australia22 sites
Icon Cancer Care Wesley
Auchenflower, Queensland, 4066
River City Pharmacy
Auchenflower, Queensland, 4066
Flinders Medical Centre-Pharmacy Department
Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042
Flinders Medical Centre
Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042
Icon Cancer Care Chermside
Chermside, Queensland, 4032
Monash Health
Clayton, Victoria, 3168
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Pharmacy
Melbourne, Victoria, 3000
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Melbourne, Victoria, 3000
Fiona Stanley Hospital
Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150
Pharmacy Department
Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150
Benjamin Carl Forster
North Sydney, New South Wales, 2060
Dr. Alexander Maxwell Menzies
North Sydney, New South Wales, 2060
HPS Pharmacies - North Sydney
North Sydney, New South Wales, 2060
Mater Hospital Sydney
North Sydney, New South Wales, 2060
Professor Frances Mary Boyle
North Sydney, New South Wales, 2060
Icon Cancer Care South Brisbane
South Brisbane, Queensland, 4101
Icon Cancer Care, Corporate Office
South Brisbane, Queensland, 4101
Icon Cancer Care Southport
Southport, Queensland, 4215
Sunshine Hospital Pharmacy
St Albans, Victoria, 3021
Sunshine Hospital
St Albans, Victoria, 3021
Royal North Shore Hospital - Clinical Trials Pharmacy
St Leonards, New South Wales, 2065
Royal North Shore Hospital, Dept. of Medical Oncology
St Leonards, New South Wales, 2065
India12 sites
The Gujarat Cancer & Research Institute, M.P Shah Cancer Hospital
Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 380016
Manipal Hospital
Bangalore, Karnataka, 560017
HealthCare Global Enterprises Ltd.
Bangalore, Karnataka, 560027
Apollo Speciality Hospital
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600 035
Kasturba Hospital
Manipal, Karnataka, 576104
Tata Memorial Centre, Tata Memorial Hospital
Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400 012
Meditrina Institute Of Medical Sciences
Nagpur, Maharashtra, 440012
Shatabdi Hospital
Nashik, Maharashtra, 422005
Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute And Research Centre
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110 085
Dr. B.R.A Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institue of Medical Sciences
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110029
Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center
Pune, Maharashtra, 411 004
Sahyadri Super Speciality Hospital
Pune, Maharashtra, 411004
About this study
Official title: A STUDY OF PALBOCICLIB IN COMBINATION WITH LETROZOLE AS TREATMENT OF POST-MENOPAUSAL WOMEN WITH HORMONE RECEPTOR-POSITIVE, HER2-NEGATIVE ADVANCED BREAST CANCER FOR WHOM LETROZOLE THERAPY IS DEEMED APPROPRIATE
A study of palbociclib in combination with letrozole as treatment of post-menopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, her2-negative advanced breast cancer for whom letrozole therapy is deemed appropriate.
Read the detailed description
To provide access to palbociclib to post-menopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive [HR(+)], HER2-negative [HER2(-)] ABC who are deemed appropriate for letrozole therapy.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- Palbociclib, Letrozole
- Keywords
- Hormone receptor positive advanced breast cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PalbociclibDrug
Also called IBRANCE
125 mg/d capsules orally for 3 out of 4 weeks in repeated cycles
LetrozoleDrug
2.5 mg/d tablets orally on a continuous regimen
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental arm | Experimental | Palbociclib plus Letrozole Receives: Drug: Palbociclib; Drug: Letrozole |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (All Causalities)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. All AEs reported after initiation of study drug treatment were considered as treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs). AE severity was graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE) version 4.03. Grade 1 AEs are mild AEs; Grade 2 AEs are moderate AEs; Grade 3 AEs are severe AEs, Grade 4 AEs are life-threatening consequences and Grade 5 AEs are deaths related to AEs. Each AE was counted once for the participant in the most severe severity. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Measured: Baseline up to 28 days after last dose of study treatment, an average of 14 months
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Severity (All Causalities)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. All AEs reported after initiation of study drug treatment were considered as TEAE. AE severity was graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE) version 4.03. Grade 1 AEs are mild AEs; Grade 2 AEs are moderate AEs; Grade 3 AEs are severe AEs, Grade 4 AEs are life-threatening consequences and Grade 5 AEs are deaths related to AEs. Each AE was counted once for the participant in the most severe severity.
Measured: Baseline up to 28 days after last dose of study treatment, an average of 14 months
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (Palbociclib-Related)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. All AEs reported after initiation of study drug treatment were considered as TEAE. AE severity was graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE) version 4.03. Grade 1 AEs are mild AEs; Grade 2 AEs are moderate AEs; Grade 3 AEs are severe AEs, Grade 4 AEs are life-threatening consequences and Grade 5 AEs are deaths related to AEs. Each AE was counted once for the participant in the most severe severity. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Palbociclib-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator.
Measured: Baseline up to 28 days after last dose of study treatment, an average of 14 months
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Severity (Palbociclib-Related)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. All AEs reported after initiation of study drug treatment were considered as TEAE. AE severity was graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE) version 4.03. Grade 1 AEs are mild AEs; Grade 2 AEs are moderate AEs; Grade 3 AEs are severe AEs, Grade 4 AEs are life-threatening consequences and Grade 5 AEs are deaths related to AEs. Each AE was counted once for the participant in the most severe severity. Palbociclib-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator.
Measured: Baseline up to 28 days after last dose of study treatment, an average of 14 months
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (All Causalities and Palbociclib-Related)
An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. Palbociclib-related SAEs were determined by the investigator.
Measured: Baseline up to 28 days after last dose of study treatment, an average of 14 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response and Partial Response
Tumor response assessments were evaluated as per local guidelines by investigators and were collected in the CRF. No response confirmation was applied.
Measured: Baseline and per routine clinical practice to time of last dose of study treatment, an average of 1 year
The Objective Response Rate (ORR)
The tumor response was based on the response reported by investigator per local practice. No response confirmation was applied. ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with complete response or partial response relative to all as-treated population.
Measured: Baseline and per routine clinical practice to time of last dose of study treatment, an average of 1 year
EQ-5D Health Utility Index Score
The EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) (version 3L) consisted of 2 parts. The first part was a 5 item questionnaire designed to assess health status in terms of a single index value or utility score. It consisted of 5 descriptors of current health state (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). A respondent was asked to rate each state on a three level scale (1=no problem, 2=some problem, and 3=extreme problem) with higher levels indicating greater severity/impairment. The answers given to the 5 descriptors permit to find 243 unique health states which can be converted into a single EQ-5D index value by published algorithms. For the EQ-5D index, published weights are available that allow for the creation of a summary score ranging from -0.594 to 1, with low scores representing a higher level of dysfunction and 1 as perfect health.
Measured: The descriptive analysis was carried out on Day 1 of each cycle (cycle 1 to cycle 38), at end of treatment (EOT) and end of study (EOS), up to 3 years. Cycle 1 Day 1 is taken to be baseline.
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Health Utility Index Score
The EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) (version 3L) consisted of 2 parts. The first part was a 5 item questionnaire designed to assess health status in terms of a single index value or utility score. It consisted of 5 descriptors of current health state (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). A respondent was asked to rate each state on a three level scale (1=no problem, 2=some problem, and 3=extreme problem) with higher levels indicating greater severity/impairment. The answers given to the 5 descriptors permit to find 243 unique health states which can be converted into a single EQ-5D index value by published algorithms. For the EQ-5D index, published weights are available that allow for the creation of a summary score ranging from -0.594 to 1, with low scores representing a higher level of dysfunction and 1 as perfect health.
Measured: The descriptive analysis was carried out on Day 1 of each cycle (cycle 1 to cycle 38), at end of treatment (EOT) and end of study (EOS), up to 3 years. Cycle 1 Day 1 is taken to be baseline.
EQ-VAS Score
The EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) (version 3L) consisted of 2 parts. The second part consisted of a visual analogue scale (the EuroQol-visual analogue scale [EQ-VAS]). The respondent's self-rated health was assessed on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state)
Measured: The descriptive analysis was carried out on Day 1 of each cycle (cycle 1 to cycle 38), at end of treatment (EOT) and end of study (EOS), up to 3 years. Cycle 1 Day 1 is taken to be baseline.
Change From Baseline in EQ-VAS Score
The EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) (version 3L) consisted of 2 parts. The second part consisted of a visual analogue scale (the EuroQol-visual analogue scale [EQ-VAS]). The respondent's self-rated health was assessed on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state)
Measured: The descriptive analysis was carried out on Day 1 of each cycle (cycle 1 to cycle 38), at end of treatment (EOT) and end of study (EOS), up to 3 years. Cycle 1 Day 1 is taken to be baseline.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Study start9 Mar 2016
- Primary completion25 Jul 2019
- Study completion25 Jul 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 252 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02679755
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A5481037
- Status last verified
- Jul 2022
- First submitted
- 22 Jan 2016
- Last updated
- 27 Jul 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jul 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A STUDY OF PALBOCICLIB IN COMBINATION WITH LETROZOLE AS TREATMENT OF POST-MENOPAUSAL WOMEN WITH HORMONE RECEPTOR-POSITIVE, HER2-NEGATIVE ADVANCED BREAST CANCER FOR WHOM LETROZOLE THERAPY IS DEEMED APPROPRIATE
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02679755
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A5481037
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- Hormone receptor positive advanced breast cancer
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 252 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 9 Mar 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 25 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Jul 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 5 Oct 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A study of palbociclib in combination with letrozole as treatment of post-menopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, her2-negative advanced breast cancer for whom letrozole therapy is deemed appropriate.
Detailed description
To provide access to palbociclib to post-menopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive [HR(+)], HER2-negative [HER2(-)] ABC who are deemed appropriate for letrozole therapy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental arm | Experimental | Drug: Palbociclib, Drug: LetrozolePalbociclib plus Letrozole |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Post-menopausal women (>=18 years of age) with proven diagnosis of advanced carcinoma of the breast (ER(+) and/or PgR(+) and HER2(-)) who are appropriate for letrozole therapy (in the first-line advanced/metastatic disease setting).
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2.
- Adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Prior treatment with any CDK inhibitor .
- QTc >480 msec; history of QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome or known history of QTc prolongation, or Torsade de Pointes.
- High cardiovascular risk, including, but not limited to myocardial infarction, severe/unstable angina, severe cardiac dysrhythmias, and symptomatic pulmonary embolism in the past 6 months of enrollment.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PalbociclibAlso: IBRANCE125 mg/d capsules orally for 3 out of 4 weeks in repeated cycles | Drug | Experimental arm |
| Letrozole2.5 mg/d tablets orally on a continuous regimen | Drug | Experimental arm |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (All Causalities)
Time frame: Baseline up to 28 days after last dose of study treatment, an average of 14 months
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. All AEs reported after initiation of study drug treatment were considered as treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs). AE severity was graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE) version 4.03. Grade 1 AEs are mild AEs; Grade 2 AEs are moderate AEs; Grade 3 AEs are severe AEs, Grade 4 AEs are life-threatening consequences and Grade 5 AEs are deaths related to AEs. Each AE was counted once for the participant in the most severe severity. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Severity (All Causalities)
Time frame: Baseline up to 28 days after last dose of study treatment, an average of 14 months
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. All AEs reported after initiation of study drug treatment were considered as TEAE. AE severity was graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE) version 4.03. Grade 1 AEs are mild AEs; Grade 2 AEs are moderate AEs; Grade 3 AEs are severe AEs, Grade 4 AEs are life-threatening consequences and Grade 5 AEs are deaths related to AEs. Each AE was counted once for the participant in the most severe severity.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (Palbociclib-Related)
Time frame: Baseline up to 28 days after last dose of study treatment, an average of 14 months
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. All AEs reported after initiation of study drug treatment were considered as TEAE. AE severity was graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE) version 4.03. Grade 1 AEs are mild AEs; Grade 2 AEs are moderate AEs; Grade 3 AEs are severe AEs, Grade 4 AEs are life-threatening consequences and Grade 5 AEs are deaths related to AEs. Each AE was counted once for the participant in the most severe severity. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Palbociclib-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Severity (Palbociclib-Related)
Time frame: Baseline up to 28 days after last dose of study treatment, an average of 14 months
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. All AEs reported after initiation of study drug treatment were considered as TEAE. AE severity was graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE) version 4.03. Grade 1 AEs are mild AEs; Grade 2 AEs are moderate AEs; Grade 3 AEs are severe AEs, Grade 4 AEs are life-threatening consequences and Grade 5 AEs are deaths related to AEs. Each AE was counted once for the participant in the most severe severity. Palbociclib-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator.
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (All Causalities and Palbociclib-Related)
Time frame: Baseline up to 28 days after last dose of study treatment, an average of 14 months
An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. Palbociclib-related SAEs were determined by the investigator.
6 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response and Partial Response
Time frame: Baseline and per routine clinical practice to time of last dose of study treatment, an average of 1 year
The Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time frame: Baseline and per routine clinical practice to time of last dose of study treatment, an average of 1 year
EQ-5D Health Utility Index Score
Time frame: The descriptive analysis was carried out on Day 1 of each cycle (cycle 1 to cycle 38), at end of treatment (EOT) and end of study (EOS), up to 3 years. Cycle 1 Day 1 is taken to be baseline.
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Health Utility Index Score
Time frame: The descriptive analysis was carried out on Day 1 of each cycle (cycle 1 to cycle 38), at end of treatment (EOT) and end of study (EOS), up to 3 years. Cycle 1 Day 1 is taken to be baseline.
EQ-VAS Score
Time frame: The descriptive analysis was carried out on Day 1 of each cycle (cycle 1 to cycle 38), at end of treatment (EOT) and end of study (EOS), up to 3 years. Cycle 1 Day 1 is taken to be baseline.
Change From Baseline in EQ-VAS Score
Time frame: The descriptive analysis was carried out on Day 1 of each cycle (cycle 1 to cycle 38), at end of treatment (EOT) and end of study (EOS), up to 3 years. Cycle 1 Day 1 is taken to be baseline.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jul 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
34 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Palbociclib and Letrozole in people with Breast Cancer, run by Pfizer at 34 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 34 sites in Australia, India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Oct 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (All Causalities) (time frame: Baseline up to 28 days after last dose of study treatment, an average of 14 months). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jul 2022.