AzTrials
AzTrials

ThyroidNCT02681328

Randomized Trial Comparing Performance of Molecular Markers for Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules

An observational study of Thyroid, run by Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of Afirma GSC and ThyroSeq v.3 in indeterminate thyroid nodules to determine which test can allow more patients to avoid unnecessary surgery and preserve quality of life. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
Thyroid
What is being tested?
Afirma GEC, ThyroSeq v.2 and Afirma GSC
How many people
328 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 May 2016to 1 Dec 2027
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients undergoing thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA) within the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Health System

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with a thyroid nodule who have a thyroid biopsy performed at UCLA health will be eligible for the study and consented if they agree to participate.
  • Patients who have an indeterminate FNA biopsy result (Bethesda category 3 or 4) will be enrolled in the study if they agree to participate.

Who cannot join

  • Patients who do not have an indeterminate biopsy result (either patients who have a benign, insufficient, or malignant result).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at UCLA

    Los Angeles, California, 90095-1781

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of Afirma GSC and ThyroSeq v.3 in indeterminate thyroid nodules to determine which test can allow more patients to avoid unnecessary surgery and preserve quality of life. In the initial phase of this study, the performance of Afirma GEC and ThyroSeq v.2 were compared.

Read the detailed description
  1. All patients undergoing thyroid FNA within the UCLA Health System will be randomized at the time of FNA to a single molecular test (GSC or ThyroSeq v.3). In the previous phase of the study, patients were randomized to the previous versions of a single molecular test (GEC or ThyroSeq v.2).
  2. During the FNA, a sample will be collected for the molecular test.
  3. If the cytology results are indeterminate (Bethesda categories 3 or 4), the molecular test will be reflexively sent off.
  4. We will help patients with indeterminate thyroid nodules to establish care with an endocrinologist, if they do not already have one. The physicians will make treatment recommendations using best practices and incorporating the results of the molecular test. We anticipate that most patients with a positive molecular test will undergo surgery, while the majority with a negative test will be surveiled.
  5. Patients who undergo surgery will have histopathologic evaluation of the thyroid, which will determine whether the index thyroid nodule was benign or malignant.
  6. Patients who do not undergo surgery will have a followup ultrasound at 6 and 12 months, or sooner at the discretion of the treating physician.
  7. We will assess thyroid-specific quality of life at baseline (following initial diagnosis of an indeterminate thyroid nodule) and during followup (at 6 and 12 months) using the short version of Thyroid-Related Patient-Reported Outcome.
Conditions
Thyroid
Being tested
Afirma GEC, ThyroSeq v.2, Afirma GSC, ThyroSeq v.3
Medical subject headings
Thyroid Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Afirma GECOther

    Afirma GEC molecular test on collected thyroid tissue

  • ThyroSeq v.2Other

    ThyroSeq v.2 molecular test on collected thyroid tissue

  • Afirma GSCOther

    Afirma GSC molecular test on collected thyroid tissue

  • ThyroSeq v.3Other

    ThyroSeq v.3 molecular test on collected thyroid tissue

Study groups in NCT02681328
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Afirma GECsingle molecular test GEC of collected tissue
Receives: Other: Afirma GEC
ThyroSeq v.2single molecular test ThyroSeq v.2 of collected tissue
Receives: Other: ThyroSeq v.2
Afirma GSCsingle molecular test GSC of collected tissue
Receives: Other: Afirma GSC
ThyroSeq v.3single molecular test ThyroSeq v.3 of collected tissue
Receives: Other: ThyroSeq v.3

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Afirma GEC vs. ThyroSeq v.2 in indeterminate thyroid nodules post best practices surgery

    compare the performance of Afirma GEC and ThyroSeq v.2 in indeterminate thyroid nodules to determine which test can allow more patients to avoid unnecessary surgery and preserve quality of life. (5) Patients who undergo surgery will have histopathologic evaluation of the thyroid, which will determine whether the index thyroid nodule was benign or malignant.

    Measured: 12 months. [This phase of the study is now completed]

  2. 2. Afirma GSC vs. ThyroSeq v.3 in indeterminate thyroid nodules post best practices surgery

    compare the performance of Afirma GSC and ThyroSeq v.3 in indeterminate thyroid nodules to determine which test can allow more patients to avoid unnecessary surgery and preserve quality of life. (5) Patients who undergo surgery will have histopathologic evaluation of the thyroid, which will determine whether the index thyroid nodule was benign or malignant.

    Measured: 12 months.

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Avoidance of unnecessary surgeries

    Determine the number of unnecessary surgeries avoided based on the number of false-positive test results, and assess whether this translated into improved quality of life.

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Feb 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 May 2016
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
328 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02681328
Sponsor's protocol ID
16-000055
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
10 Feb 2016
Last updated
22 Dec 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Cibas ES, Ali SZ; NCI Thyroid FNA State of the Science Conference. The Bethesda System For Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009 Nov;132(5):658-65. doi: 10.1309/AJCPPHLWMI3JV4LA.

    PubMed 19846805
  • Lee L, How J, Tabah RJ, Mitmaker EJ. Cost-effectiveness of molecular testing for thyroid nodules with atypia of undetermined significance cytology. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Aug;99(8):2674-82. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-1219. Epub 2014 Mar 31.

    PubMed 24684467
  • Alexander EK, Kennedy GC, Baloch ZW, Cibas ES, Chudova D, Diggans J, Friedman L, Kloos RT, LiVolsi VA, Mandel SJ, Raab SS, Rosai J, Steward DL, Walsh PS, Wilde JI, Zeiger MA, Lanman RB, Haugen BR. Preoperative diagnosis of benign thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology. N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 23;367(8):705-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1203208. Epub 2012 Jun 25.

    PubMed 22731672
  • Nikiforov YE, Carty SE, Chiosea SI, Coyne C, Duvvuri U, Ferris RL, Gooding WE, LeBeau SO, Ohori NP, Seethala RR, Tublin ME, Yip L, Nikiforova MN. Impact of the Multi-Gene ThyroSeq Next-Generation Sequencing Assay on Cancer Diagnosis in Thyroid Nodules with Atypia of Undetermined Significance/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance Cytology. Thyroid. 2015 Nov;25(11):1217-23. doi: 10.1089/thy.2015.0305. Epub 2015 Sep 10.

    PubMed 26356635
  • Wu JX, Lam R, Levin M, Rao J, Sullivan PS, Yeh MW. Effect of malignancy rates on cost-effectiveness of routine gene expression classifier testing for indeterminate thyroid nodules. Surgery. 2016 Jan;159(1):118-26. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.05.035. Epub 2015 Oct 2.

    PubMed 26435428
  • Wu JX, Young S, Hung ML, Li N, Yang SE, Cheung DS, Yeh MW, Livhits MJ. Clinical Factors Influencing the Performance of Gene Expression Classifier Testing in Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules. Thyroid. 2016 Jul;26(7):916-22. doi: 10.1089/thy.2015.0505. Epub 2016 Jun 9.

    PubMed 27161519
  • Hu TX, Nguyen DT, Patel M, Beckett K, Douek M, Masamed R, Rhyu J, Kim J, Tseng CH, Yeh MW, Livhits MJ. The Effect Modification of Ultrasound Risk Classification on Molecular Testing in Predicting the Risk of Malignancy in Cytologically Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules. Thyroid. 2022 Aug;32(8):905-916. doi: 10.1089/thy.2021.0659. Epub 2022 Jun 23.

    PubMed 35611970
  • Zhu CY, Donangelo I, Gupta D, Nguyen DT, Ochoa JE, Yeh MW, Livhits MJ. Outcomes of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules Managed Nonoperatively after Molecular Testing. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Mar 8;106(3):e1240-e1247. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa887.

    PubMed 33394039
  • Livhits MJ, Zhu CY, Kuo EJ, Nguyen DT, Kim J, Tseng CH, Leung AM, Rao J, Levin M, Douek ML, Beckett KR, Cheung DS, Gofnung YA, Smooke-Praw S, Yeh MW. Effectiveness of Molecular Testing Techniques for Diagnosis of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021 Jan 1;7(1):70-77. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.5935.

    PubMed 33300952
  • Livhits MJ, Kuo EJ, Leung AM, Rao J, Levin M, Douek ML, Beckett KR, Zanocco KA, Cheung DS, Gofnung YA, Smooke-Praw S, Yeh MW. Gene Expression Classifier vs Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing in the Management of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018 Jun 1;103(6):2261-2268. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-02754.

    PubMed 29590358

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Thyroid, run by Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Afirma GEC vs. ThyroSeq v.2 in indeterminate thyroid nodules post best practices surgery (time frame: 12 months. [This phase of the study is now completed]). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02681328, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Dec 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in