Diabetic RetinopathyPhase 2CIRCLENCT02681809
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ocriplasmin in Inducing Total PVD in Subjects With NPDR
A Phase 2 study testing ocriplasmin 0.0625mg and ocriplasmin 0.125mg in people with Diabetic Retinopathy and Posterior Vitreous Detachment, run by ThromboGenics at 38 sites in 9 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of up to 3 intravitreal injections of ocriplasmin (0.0625mg or 0.125mg), in subjects with moderate to very severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), to induce total posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) in order to reduce the risk of disease… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetic Retinopathy, Posterior Vitreous Detachment, Disease Progression
- What is being tested?
- ocriplasmin 0.0625mg and ocriplasmin 0.125mg
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 48 participants
- Where
- 38 sitesin 9 countries
- Study dates
- Dec 2015to 18 Nov 2019
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female aged 18 years or older
- Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 65 letters read or greater (Snellen equivalent of 20/50 or better) in the study eye
- HbA1c ≤ 12%, as assessed by the central laboratory
- Moderate to very severe NPDR as per ETDRS Severity Scale, based on 7 standard field stereo colour fundus photograph
- Central subfield thickness of ≤ 340µm on Spectralis SD-OCT or ≤ 320µm on non-Spectralis SD OCT in the study eye, with or without mild centre-involved diabetic macular oedema
- No evidence of total PVD in the study eye
- Written informed consent obtained from the subject prior to screening procedures
Who cannot join
- History of or current ocular condition in the study eye that may interfere with the assessment of the progression to PDR
- Presence of epiretinal membrane in the study eye
- Presence of foveal ischemia in the study eye
- Presence of pre-retinal or vitreous haemorrhage in the study eye
- Presence of iris or angle neovascularisation in the study eye
- Any active ocular / intraocular infection or inflammation in either eye
Show all 9Show fewer
- Aphakic study eye
- Uncontrolled hypertension in the opinion of the Investigator
- Pseudoexfoliation, Marfan's syndrome, phacodonesis or any other finding in the Investigator's opinion suggesting lens / zonular instability
Trial locations and contacts
38 sites in 9 countries.
38 sites in 9 countries
United States9 sites
Study site
Campbell, California, 95008
Study site
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903
Study site
Irvine, California, 92697
Study site
Loma Linda, California, 92354
Study site
McAllen, Texas, 78503
Study site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85021
Study site
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57701
Study site
San Antonio, Texas, 78240
Study site
Santa Ana, California, 92705
Czechia7 sites
Study site
Brno, 625 00
Study site
Hradec Králové, 500 05
Study site
Olomouc, 779 00
Study site
Pardubice, 530 02
Study site
Prague, 100 34
Study site
Prague, 140 00
Study site
Zlín, 760 01
Hungary6 sites
Study site
Budapest, 1062
Study site
Budapest, 1083
Study site
Budapest, 1106
Study site
Budapest, 1133
Study site
Debrecen, Hajdú-Bihar, 4032
Study site
Szombathely, 9700
Israel4 sites
Study site
Beersheba, 84101
Study site
Petah Tikva, 4941492
Study site
Rehovot, 7610001
Study site
Tel Aviv, 6423906
Spain4 sites
Study site
Barcelona, 08195
Study site
Barcelona, 8025
Study site
Girona, 17007
Study site
Valladolid, 47012
Germany3 sites
Study site
Darmstadt, Hesse, 64297
Study site
Leipzig, Saxony, 04103
Study site
München, Bavaria, 80336
United Kingdom3 sites
Study site
Frimley, Surrey, GU16 7UJ
Study site
London, EC1V 2PD
Study site
London, SE5 9RS
About this study
Official title: A Phase 2, Randomised, Double Masked, Sham Controlled, Multicentre Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ocriplasmin in Inducing Total Posterior Vitreous Detachment (PVD) in Subjects With Non-proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (NPDR)
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of up to 3 intravitreal injections of ocriplasmin (0.0625mg or 0.125mg), in subjects with moderate to very severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), to induce total posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) in order to reduce the risk of disease progression to proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).
- Being tested
- ocriplasmin 0.0625mg, ocriplasmin 0.125mg, Sham injection
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetic Retinopathy, Vitreous Detachment, Disease Progression
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ocriplasmin 0.0625mgDrug
Up to 3 intravitreal injections of ocriplasmin 0.0625mg approximately 1 month apart
ocriplasmin 0.125mgDrug
Up to 3 intravitreal injections of ocriplasmin 0.125mg approximately 1 month apart
Sham injectionDrug
3 sham injections approximately 1 month apart. No actual injections. No medication is used.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ocriplasmin 0.0625mg | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: ocriplasmin 0.0625mg |
| Ocriplasmin 0.125mg | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: ocriplasmin 0.125mg |
| Sham injection | Sham comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Sham injection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Subjects With Total PVD by the Month 3 Visit
Total PVD should be confirmed on both B-scan ultrasound and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), as assessed by the masked central reading centres
Measured: Month 3
Secondary outcomes (1)
Number of Subjects With Ocular Treatment-emergent Adverse Events in the Study Eye
Adverse events were identified by ophthalmic assessments (including BCVA assessment, full ophthalmic examination and ocular imaging) and by subject reporting
Measured: From first injection until the end of the study (Month 24)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2015
- Primary completion18 Nov 2019
- Study completion18 Nov 2019
Why it stopped: Slow recruitment rate
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Diabetic RetinopathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- ThromboGenics
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Department, Study director, ThromboGenics
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02681809
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TG-MV-015
- Other IDs
- 2015-002415-15, 2015
- Acronym
- CIRCLE
- Status last verified
- Dec 2020
- First submitted
- 5 Feb 2016
- Last updated
- 16 Dec 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Dec 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 2, Randomised, Double Masked, Sham Controlled, Multicentre Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ocriplasmin in Inducing Total Posterior Vitreous Detachment (PVD) in Subjects With Non-proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (NPDR)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02681809
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CIRCLE / TG-MV-015
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Slow recruitment rate
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- ThromboGenicsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Dec 2015
- Primary completion
- 18 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Nov 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 16 Dec 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of up to 3 intravitreal injections of ocriplasmin (0.0625mg or 0.125mg), in subjects with moderate to very severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), to induce total posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) in order to reduce the risk of disease progression to proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ocriplasmin 0.0625mg | Experimental | Drug: ocriplasmin 0.0625mg |
| Ocriplasmin 0.125mg | Experimental | Drug: ocriplasmin 0.125mg |
| Sham injection | Sham comparator | Drug: Sham injection |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Male or female aged 18 years or older
- Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 65 letters read or greater (Snellen equivalent of 20/50 or better) in the study eye
- HbA1c ≤ 12%, as assessed by the central laboratory
- Moderate to very severe NPDR as per ETDRS Severity Scale, based on 7 standard field stereo colour fundus photograph
- Central subfield thickness of ≤ 340µm on Spectralis SD-OCT or ≤ 320µm on non-Spectralis SD OCT in the study eye, with or without mild centre-involved diabetic macular oedema
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- History of or current ocular condition in the study eye that may interfere with the assessment of the progression to PDR
- Presence of epiretinal membrane in the study eye
- Presence of foveal ischemia in the study eye
- Presence of pre-retinal or vitreous haemorrhage in the study eye
- Presence of iris or angle neovascularisation in the study eye
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ocriplasmin 0.0625mgUp to 3 intravitreal injections of ocriplasmin 0.0625mg approximately 1 month apart | Drug | Ocriplasmin 0.0625mg |
| ocriplasmin 0.125mgUp to 3 intravitreal injections of ocriplasmin 0.125mg approximately 1 month apart | Drug | Ocriplasmin 0.125mg |
| Sham injection3 sham injections approximately 1 month apart. No actual injections. No medication is used. | Drug | Sham injection |
Primary outcome
Number of Subjects With Total PVD by the Month 3 Visit
Time frame: Month 3
Total PVD should be confirmed on both B-scan ultrasound and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), as assessed by the masked central reading centres
1 secondary outcome
Number of Subjects With Ocular Treatment-emergent Adverse Events in the Study Eye
Time frame: From first injection until the end of the study (Month 24)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Dec 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Diabetic Retinopathy
Recruiting
Implementing AI-based Glaucoma Screening Within Federally Qualified Health Centers
Glaucoma, Ocular Hypertension
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Real World Evidence in China: Faricimab Use in Diabetic Macular Edema, Retinal Vein Occlusion, and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (The Farseeing Study)
Diabetic Macular Edema, Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Long-Term Follow-Up Study of RGX-314 Administered in the Suprachoroidal Space for Participants With and Without Diabetic Retinopathy
Diabetic Retinopathy, DR
Recruiting
To Investigate the Feasibility and Acceptability of Trained Non-medical Professionals Performing Laser Treatment for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR), and the Potential Impact on Service Capacity. Assess Feasibility of Conducting a Full Trial Comparing Trained ECPs With Ophthalmologists
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR)
RecruitingPhase 2
Oral N-Acetylcysteine on Diabetic Macular Edema
Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Department study director
ThromboGenics
38 sites in 9 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing ocriplasmin 0.0625mg and ocriplasmin 0.125mg in people with Diabetic Retinopathy and Posterior Vitreous Detachment, run by ThromboGenics at 38 sites in 9 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 38 sites in United States, Czechia, Hungary, Israel, Spain and 4 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Dec 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Subjects With Total PVD by the Month 3 Visit (time frame: Month 3). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Dec 2020.