Upper Airway ObstructionPhase 3NCT02683772
Astral VAPS AutoEPAP Clinical Trial
A Phase 3 study testing Astral in people with Upper Airway Obstruction and Respiratory Insufficiency, run by ResMed at 5 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Patients with chronic respiratory failure such as those associated with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome (OHS), Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) or Neuromuscular Disease (NMD) are increasingly managed with domiciliary non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Upper Airway Obstruction, Respiratory Insufficiency, Respiratory Failure
- What is being tested?
- Astral
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 42 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 15 Apr 2016to 6 Jul 2017
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participant has ability to provide written informed consent
- Participants aged ≥18 years old
- Participant has documented respiratory failure (e.g. sleep hypoventilation with historical PtCO2 increase ≥ 10mmHg) and/or daytime hypercapnia (>45 mmHg)
- Participant is currently using non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in ST or VAPS mode for ≥ 3 months
- Participants with a previously documented AHI ≥ 5/hr
- Participants with a recently (≤ 12 months ago) reviewed EPAP setting
Who cannot join
- Participants are not compliant on NIPPV (e.g. < 4 hr/night)
- Participants who are pregnant
- Participants on oxygen therapy ≥5 L/min
- Participants with an invasive interface (e.g. tracheostomy)
- Participants who have had an acute exacerbation within the last 3 months that resulted in a hospitalisation
- Participants who are acutely ill, medically complicated or who are medically unstable
Show all 14Show fewer
- Participants in whom NIPPV therapy is otherwise medically contraindicated
- Participants who have had surgery of the upper airway, nose, sinus, or middle ear within the previous 90 days
- Participants with untreated, non-OSA sleep disorders, including but not limited to; insomnia, periodic limb movement syndrome, or restless legs syndrome.
- Participants who have the following pre-existing conditions: severe bullous lung disease, recurrent pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum, cerebrospinal fluid leak, recent cranial surgery or trauma.
- Participant does not comprehend English
- Participant is unable or unwilling to provide written informed consent
- Participant is physically and/or mentally unable to comply with the protocol
- Participant is not suitable to participate in the trial for any other reason in the opinion of the investigator
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
United States5 sites
Lisa F. Wolfe, MD
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
National Jewish Health
Denver, Colorado, 80206
University of California, San Diego
La Jolla, California, 92037
Temple University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112
About this study
Official title: The Evaluation of the Astral VAPS AutoEPAP Treatment Algorithm
Patients with chronic respiratory failure such as those associated with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome (OHS), Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) or Neuromuscular Disease (NMD) are increasingly managed with domiciliary non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV). The aim of this study is to now compare the Automatic Expiratory Positive Airway Pressure (AutoEPAP) algorithm with a fixed manual EPAP in iVAPS mode on an Astral mixed mode ventilator. It is proposed that the automatic settings of AutoEPAP will be as effective at managing respiratory failure and upper airway obstruction (UAO) as manual EPAP on the Astral device. Specifically demonstrating that the AutoEPAP function is as effective at treating UAO as manual EPAP.
- Being tested
- Astral
- Keywords
- NIV, NIPPV, ventilation
- Medical subject headings
- Airway Obstruction, Respiratory Insufficiency, Respiratory Aspiration
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AstralDevice
Astral ventilator
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| iVAPS with AutoEPAP | Experimental | This is a crossover study. During overnight PSG, Astral device will be set using iVAPS with AutoEPAP on the first night, and on iVAPS with manual EPAP on the second night. Receives: Device: Astral |
| iVAPS with manual EPAP | Active comparator | This is a crossover study. During overnight PSG, Astral device will be set using iVAPS with manual EPAP on the first night, and on iVAPS with AutoEPAP on the second night. Receives: Device: Astral |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Oxygen Desaturation Index 4% (ODI4%)
Mean paired difference AutoEPAP-manual EPAP: Comparison of Oxygen Desaturation Index 4% (ODI4%) values between groups by using mean ODI4% (#events/hour). A cross-over analysis was generated to investigate the influence of a possible period effect on the primary endpoint, paired change in ODI4% between Auto and manual EPAP
Measured: Overnight, up to 8 hrs on nights 1 and 2
Secondary outcomes (4)
Sleep Efficiency (%)
To assess sleep efficacy between groups by using rapid eye movement sleep (REM) (% of total sleep time)
Measured: Overnight, up to 8 hrs on nights 1 and 2
Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI)
To assess sleep-breathing parameters between groups using mean AHI (#events/hour)
Measured: Overnight, up 8 hrs on night 1 and 2
Nadir Arterial Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)
To assess Sleep-breathing parameters between groups using mean SpO2 (%)
Measured: Overnight, up 8 hrs on night 1 and 2
Arterial Carbon Dioxide (PCO2)
To assess Sleep-breathing parameters between groups using mean PCO2 (mmHg)
Measured: Overnight, up 8 hrs on night 1 and 2
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Study start15 Apr 2016
- Primary completion1 Mar 2017
- Study completion6 Jul 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Upper Airway ObstructionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- ResMed
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Lisa Wolfe, MD, Principal investigator, Northwestern Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02683772
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MA-15-12-15
- Status last verified
- Jul 2019
- First submitted
- 3 Feb 2016
- Last updated
- 26 Jul 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Budweiser S, Jorres RA, Riedl T, Heinemann F, Hitzl AP, Windisch W, Pfeifer M. Predictors of survival in COPD patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure receiving noninvasive home ventilation. Chest. 2007 Jun;131(6):1650-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-2124.
PubMed 17565016Masa JF, Celli BR, Riesco JA, Hernandez M, Sanchez De Cos J, Disdier C. The obesity hypoventilation syndrome can be treated with noninvasive mechanical ventilation. Chest. 2001 Apr;119(4):1102-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.4.1102.
PubMed 11296176Remmers JE, deGroot WJ, Sauerland EK, Anch AM. Pathogenesis of upper airway occlusion during sleep. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1978 Jun;44(6):931-8. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1978.44.6.931. No abstract available.
PubMed 670014Ward S, Chatwin M, Heather S, Simonds AK. Randomised controlled trial of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for nocturnal hypoventilation in neuromuscular and chest wall disease patients with daytime normocapnia. Thorax. 2005 Dec;60(12):1019-24. doi: 10.1136/thx.2004.037424.
PubMed 16299118Laghi F, Tobin MJ. Disorders of the respiratory muscles. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Jul 1;168(1):10-48. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2206020.
PubMed 12826594Suh ES, Murphy PB. Auto-titration of EPAP during NIV: A better night's sleep? Respirology. 2019 Dec;24(12):1132-1133. doi: 10.1111/resp.13587. Epub 2019 May 23. No abstract available.
PubMed 31120585Orr JE, Coleman J, Criner GJ, Sundar KM, Tsai SC, Benjafield AV, Crocker ME, Willes L, Malhotra A, Owens RL, Wolfe LF. Automatic EPAP intelligent volume-assured pressure support is effective in patients with chronic respiratory failure: A randomized trial. Respirology. 2019 Dec;24(12):1204-1211. doi: 10.1111/resp.13546. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
PubMed 31012225
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jul 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Evaluation of the Astral VAPS AutoEPAP Treatment Algorithm
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02683772
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MA-15-12-15
- Keywords
- NIV, NIPPV, ventilation
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- ResMedIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 15 Apr 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 6 Jul 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 26 Jul 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients with chronic respiratory failure such as those associated with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome (OHS), Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) or Neuromuscular Disease (NMD) are increasingly managed with domiciliary non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV). The aim of this study is to now compare the Automatic Expiratory Positive Airway Pressure (AutoEPAP) algorithm with a fixed manual EPAP in iVAPS mode on an Astral mixed mode ventilator. It is proposed that the automatic settings of AutoEPAP will be as effective at managing respiratory failure and upper airway obstruction (UAO) as manual EPAP on the Astral device. Specifically demonstrating that the AutoEPAP function is as effective at treating UAO as manual EPAP.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| iVAPS with AutoEPAP | Experimental | Device: AstralThis is a crossover study. During overnight PSG, Astral device will be set using iVAPS with AutoEPAP on the first night, and on iVAPS with manual EPAP on the second night. |
| iVAPS with manual EPAP | Active comparator | Device: AstralThis is a crossover study. During overnight PSG, Astral device will be set using iVAPS with manual EPAP on the first night, and on iVAPS with AutoEPAP on the second night. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Participant has ability to provide written informed consent
- Participants aged ≥18 years old
- Participant has documented respiratory failure (e.g. sleep hypoventilation with historical PtCO2 increase ≥ 10mmHg) and/or daytime hypercapnia (>45 mmHg)
- Participant is currently using non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in ST or VAPS mode for ≥ 3 months
- Participants with a previously documented AHI ≥ 5/hr
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Participants are not compliant on NIPPV (e.g. < 4 hr/night)
- Participants who are pregnant
- Participants on oxygen therapy ≥5 L/min
- Participants with an invasive interface (e.g. tracheostomy)
- Participants who have had an acute exacerbation within the last 3 months that resulted in a hospitalisation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AstralAstral ventilator | Device | iVAPS with AutoEPAP, iVAPS with manual EPAP |
Primary outcome
Oxygen Desaturation Index 4% (ODI4%)
Time frame: Overnight, up to 8 hrs on nights 1 and 2
Mean paired difference AutoEPAP-manual EPAP: Comparison of Oxygen Desaturation Index 4% (ODI4%) values between groups by using mean ODI4% (#events/hour). A cross-over analysis was generated to investigate the influence of a possible period effect on the primary endpoint, paired change in ODI4% between Auto and manual EPAP
4 secondary outcomes
Sleep Efficiency (%)
Time frame: Overnight, up to 8 hrs on nights 1 and 2
Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI)
Time frame: Overnight, up 8 hrs on night 1 and 2
Nadir Arterial Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)
Time frame: Overnight, up 8 hrs on night 1 and 2
Arterial Carbon Dioxide (PCO2)
Time frame: Overnight, up 8 hrs on night 1 and 2
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jul 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 17565016Budweiser S, Jorres RA, Riedl T, Heinemann F, Hitzl AP, Windisch W, Pfeifer M. Predictors of survival in COPD patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure receiving noninvasive home ventilation. Chest. 2007 Jun;131(6):1650-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-2124.
- Background: PubMed 11296176Masa JF, Celli BR, Riesco JA, Hernandez M, Sanchez De Cos J, Disdier C. The obesity hypoventilation syndrome can be treated with noninvasive mechanical ventilation. Chest. 2001 Apr;119(4):1102-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.4.1102.
- Background: PubMed 670014Remmers JE, deGroot WJ, Sauerland EK, Anch AM. Pathogenesis of upper airway occlusion during sleep. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1978 Jun;44(6):931-8. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1978.44.6.931. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 16299118Ward S, Chatwin M, Heather S, Simonds AK. Randomised controlled trial of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for nocturnal hypoventilation in neuromuscular and chest wall disease patients with daytime normocapnia. Thorax. 2005 Dec;60(12):1019-24. doi: 10.1136/thx.2004.037424.
- Background: PubMed 12826594Laghi F, Tobin MJ. Disorders of the respiratory muscles. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Jul 1;168(1):10-48. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2206020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31120585Suh ES, Murphy PB. Auto-titration of EPAP during NIV: A better night's sleep? Respirology. 2019 Dec;24(12):1132-1133. doi: 10.1111/resp.13587. Epub 2019 May 23. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31012225Orr JE, Coleman J, Criner GJ, Sundar KM, Tsai SC, Benjafield AV, Crocker ME, Willes L, Malhotra A, Owens RL, Wolfe LF. Automatic EPAP intelligent volume-assured pressure support is effective in patients with chronic respiratory failure: A randomized trial. Respirology. 2019 Dec;24(12):1204-1211. doi: 10.1111/resp.13546. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Upper Airway Obstruction
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Difficult Airway Management in Oncology: An International Delphi Consensus Study (DAMO)
Neoplasms, Airway Obstruction Upper
Not yet recruiting
Asthma Lung Sounds With Wearable Stethoscope
Asthma, Pediatric Asthma
Not yet recruitingObservational study
A Study to Evaluate the Diagnostic Performance of Portable Oscillometry Across Chronic Respiratory Diseases
COPD, Asthma (Diagnosis)
Recruiting
Flow-Controlled Versus Volume-Controlled Ventilation During Balloon Dilatation Under Direct Laryngoscopy
Airway Stenosis, Upper Airway Obstruction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lisa Wolfe, MD principal investigator
Northwestern Medical Center
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Astral in people with Upper Airway Obstruction and Respiratory Insufficiency, run by ResMed at 5 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Jul 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Oxygen Desaturation Index 4% (ODI4%) (time frame: Overnight, up to 8 hrs on nights 1 and 2). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02683772, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jul 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 29 Oct 2026.