AzTrials
AzTrials

Diffuse AstrocytomaPhase 2NCT02684058

Study of Efficacy and Safety of Dabrafenib in Combination With Trametinib in Pediatric Patients With BRAF V600 Mutation Positive LGG or Relapsed or Refractory HGG Tumors

A Phase 2 study testing Dabrafenib, trametinib and Carboplatin in people with Diffuse Astrocytoma and Anaplastic Astrocytoma, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 57 sites in 20 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study was to investigate the activity of dabrafenib in combination with trametinib in children and adolescent patients with BRAF V600 mutation positive low grade glioma (LGG) or relapsed or refractory high grade glioma (HGG) Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 months to 17 years
What is being tested?
Dabrafenib, trametinib and Carboplatin
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
151 participants
Where
57 sitesin 20 countries
Study dates
28 Dec 2017to 28 Apr 2023
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 months to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of BRAF V600 mutant High Grade glioma that had relapsed, progressed or failed to respond to frontline therapy
  • Diagnosis of BRAF V600 mutant Low Grade glioma with progressive disease following surgical excision, or non-surgical candidates with necessity to begin first systemic treatment because of a risk of neurological impairment with progression.
  • Confirmed measurable disease

Who cannot join

  • Previous treatment with dabrafenib, trametinib, other RAF inhibitor, other MEK or ERK inhibitor
  • HGG patient: Cancer treatment within the past 3 weeks. LGG patient: Any systemic therapy or radiotherapy prior to enrollment
  • LGG patients: history of allergic reaction or contraindications to the use of carboplatin or vincristine
  • Stem cell transplant within the past 3 months
  • History of heart disease
  • Pregnant or lactating females

Trial locations and contacts

57 sites in 20 countries.

57 sites in 20 countries

United States10 sites
  • Johns Hopkins University IDS Pharmacy John Hopkins Hospital

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21287

  • Ann and Robert H Lurie Childrens Hospital of Chicago .

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • Cincinnati Childrens Hospital Medical Center Cancer & Blood Disease Inst.

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229-3039

  • Texas Children s Hospital Baylor College of Medicine

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Indiana University School of Medicine .

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202-2810

  • St Jude Children's Research Hospital

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38105

  • Nicklaus Childrens Hospital

    Miami, Florida, 33155

  • Children's Hospital of Orange County

    Orange, California, 92868

  • Washington University School of Medicine SC

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • Childrens National Hospital

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010

Other trials in United States

Germany7 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Augsburg, 86179

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Berlin, 13353

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Cologne, 50937

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Essen, 45147

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Göttingen, 37075

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Hamburg, 20246

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Heidelberg, 69120

Other trials in Germany

France6 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Lille, 59020

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Lyon, 69373

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Paris, 75231

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Strasbourg, 67000

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Toulouse, 31059

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Villejuif, 94800

Other trials in France

Italy5 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Florence, FI, 50139

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Genova, GE, 16147

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Milan, MI, 20133

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Roma, RM, 00165

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Torino, TO, 10126

Other trials in Italy

Brazil3 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Barretos, São Paulo, 14784 400

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 04829-310

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 08270-070

Other trials in Brazil

Canada3 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1C5

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H 3V4

Other trials in Canada

Japan3 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 812-8582

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Osaka, 534-0021

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, 157-8535

Other trials in Japan

Spain3 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Barcelona, Catalonia, 08035

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Madrid, 28009

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Valencia, 46026

Other trials in Spain

United Kingdom3 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Leeds, LS1 3EX

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Liverpool, L12 2AP

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    London, WC1N 3JH

Other trials in United Kingdom

Australia2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Parkville, Victoria, 3052

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Randwick, New South Wales, 2130

Other trials in Australia

Czechia2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Brno, 613 00

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Prague, 150 06

Other trials in Czechia

Israel2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Petah Tikva, 49202

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Tel HaShomer, 52621

Other trials in Israel

Argentina1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    CABA, Buenos Aires, C1428AQK

Other trials in Argentina

Belgium1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Brussels, BE-B-1200

Other trials in Belgium

Denmark1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Copenhagen, 2100 O

Other trials in Denmark

Finland1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Tampere, 33521

Other trials in Finland

Netherlands1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Utrecht, CS, 3584

Other trials in Netherlands

Russia1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Moscow, 117198

Other trials in Russia

Sweden1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Stockholm, 17176

Other trials in Sweden

Switzerland1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Zurich, 8032

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: Phase II Open-label Global Study to Evaluate the Effect of Dabrafenib in Combination With Trametinib in Children and Adolescent Patients With BRAF V600 Mutation Positive Low Grade Glioma (LGG) or Relapsed or Refractory High Grade Glioma (HGG)

The purpose of this study was to investigate the activity of dabrafenib in combination with trametinib in children and adolescent patients with BRAF V600 mutation positive low grade glioma (LGG) or relapsed or refractory high grade glioma (HGG)

Read the detailed description

This study combines two pediatric glioma cohorts (LGG and HGG cohorts) into a multi-center, open-label, Phase II study:

  • The LGG cohort is a multi-center, randomized, open-label part of this Phase II study conducted in children and adolescent patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive LGG whose tumor was unresectable and who required first systemic treatment. Participants in the LGG cohort were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to either dabrafenib plus trametinib or carboplatin with vincristine.
  • The HGG cohort is a multi-center, single-arm, open-label part of this Phase II study conducted in children and adolescent patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive, refractory or relapsed HGG tumors after having received at least one previous standard therapy.

The duration of treatment for participants on dabrafenib plus trametinib in LGG and for all patients in the HGG cohort was continued until the loss of clinical benefit in the opinion of the Investigator, unacceptable toxicity, start of a new anti-neoplastic therapy, discontinuation at the discretion of the investigator or patient/legal guardian, lost to follow-up, death, study termination by the sponsor, or until disease progression. The duration of treatment for patients in the carboplatin with vincristine arm in LGG cohort was continued for the prescribed number of cycles, as tolerated or until unacceptable toxicity, start of a new anti-neoplastic therapy, discontinuation at the discretion of the investigator or patient/legal guardian, lost to follow-up, death, study is terminated by the sponsor or until disease progression. Participants randomized to the carboplatin with vincristine treatment arm were allowed to cross over to receive dabrafenib in combination with trametinib after centrally confirmed RANO-defined disease progression. Crossover was allowed during the treatment period or the post-treatment period.

After discontinuation of study treatment, all participants (LGG and HGG cohorts) were followed for safety for at least 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. All participants who discontinued study treatment for reasons other than disease progression, death, loss to follow up, or withdrawal of consent moved into the post-treatment efficacy follow-up phase. Finally, all participants were followed for survival once they discontinued study treatment for at least 2 years after the last patient first study treatment (except if consent was withdrawn, death, or the patient was lost to follow-up or discontinued study)

Being tested
Dabrafenib, trametinib, Carboplatin, Vincristine
Keywords
Malignant glioma, BRAF mutant positive, High grade glioma, Low grade glioma, Dabrafenib, Trametinib, Pediatrics, Brain neoplasma
Medical subject headings
Astrocytoma, Oligodendroglioma, Glioblastoma, Ganglioneuroma, Ganglioglioma, Neurocytoma, Glioma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • DabrafenibDrug

    Also called DRB436

    Dabrafenib was available as 50 mg and 75 mg hard capsules and as 10 mg dispersible tablets for oral suspension. Dabrafenib was administered orally, twice daily, and was dosed based on age and weight Patients < 12 years old and ≥ 16 kg were to be administered either the dabrafenib capsules or dabrafenib dispersible tablets for oral suspension (dose: 5.25 mg/kg/day) Patients ≥ 12 years old and ≥ 19 kg were to be administered either the dabrafenib capsules or dabrafenib dispersible tablets for oral suspension (dose: 4.5 mg/kg/day) Patients < 12 years old and < 16 kg were to be administered dabrafenib dispersible tablets for oral suspension (dose: 5.25 mg/kg/day) Patients ≥12 years old and <19 kg were to be administered dabrafenib dispersible tablets for oral suspension (dose: 4.5 mg/kg/day)

  • trametinibDrug

    Also called TMT212

    Trametinib was available as 0.5 mg and 2 mg film-coated tablets and as 5.0 mg powder in bottle for oral solution (0.05 mg/ml after reconstitution with 90 ml water).Trametinib was administered orally, once daily in combination with the first daily dose of dabrafenib and was dosed based on age and weight.

    Patients <6 years old and <26 kg were to be administered the trametinib oral solution (dose: 0.032 mg/kg/day) Patients <6 years old and ≥26 kg were to be administered either the trametinib oral solution or trametinib tablets (dose: 0.032 mg/kg/day) Patients ≥6 years old and ≥10 kg < 33 kg were to be administered the trametinib oral solution (dose: 0.025 mg/kg/day) Patients ≥6 years old and ≥33 kg were to be administered either the trametinib oral solution or the trametinib tablets (dose: 0.025 mg/kg/day)

  • CarboplatinDrug

    Carboplatin was supplied locally as commercially available and labelled accordingly to comply with legal requirements of each country. Carboplatin was administered as one course of induction (10 weeks of chemotherapy with 2 weeks of rest), followed by 8 cycles of maintenance chemotherapy. Each maintenance cycle was 6 weeks, and consisted of 4 weeks of chemotherapy with 2 weeks of rest.

    Induction: 175 mg/m^2 as weekly intravenous (IV) infusion on weeks 1 to 4, and on weeks 7 to 10, on the same day as vincristine dosing Maintenance: 175 mg/m^2 as weekly IV infusion over 60 minutes on weeks 1 to 4 of each cycle.

  • VincristineDrug

    Vincristine was supplied locally as commercially available and labelled accordingly to comply with legal requirements of each country. Vincristine was administered as one course of induction (10 weeks of chemotherapy with 2 weeks of rest), followed by 8 cycles of maintenance chemotherapy.

    Induction: 1.5 mg/m^2 as weekly IV bolus infusion (0.05 mg/kg if child is <12 kg) (maximum dose of 2.0 mg) for 10 weeks.

    Maintenance: 1.5 mg/m^2 as weekly IV bolus infusion (0.05 mg/kg if child is <12 kg) (maximum dose of 2.0 mg) on weeks 1 to 3 of each cycle, on the same day as carboplatin dosing.

Study groups in NCT02684058
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
LGG cohort: dabrafenib and trametinibExperimentalParticipants in the LGG cohort randomized to receive dabrafenib (orally, twice daily and dosed based on weight and age) in combination with trametinib (orally, once daily in combination with the first daily dose of dabrafenib and was dosed based on weight)
Receives: Drug: Dabrafenib; Drug: trametinib
LGG cohort: carboplatin and vincristineActive comparatorParticipants in the LGG cohort randomized to receive active comparator chemotherapy (carboplatin and vincristine). Participants received one course of induction (10 weeks of chemotherapy with 2 weeks of rest), followed by 8 cycles of maintenance chemotherapy.
Receives: Drug: Carboplatin; Drug: Vincristine
HGG cohort: dabrafenib and trametinibExperimentalParticipants in the HGG cohort received dabrafenib (orally, twice daily and dosed based on weight and age) and trametinib (orally, once daily in combination with the first daily dose of dabrafenib and dosed based on weight)
Receives: Drug: Dabrafenib; Drug: trametinib

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. LGG Cohort: Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Central Independent Assessment Using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Criteria

    Percentage of participants in the LGG cohort with a best overall confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) as assessed per RANO criteria by central independent assessment. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using two-sided exact binomial method.

    CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.

    PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.

    Measured: Up to approximately (approx.) 3 years

  2. HGG Cohort: Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria

    Percentage of participants in the HGG cohort with a best overall confirmed CR or PR as assessed per RANO criteria by central independent assessment. The 95% CIs were computed using two-sided exact binomial method.

    CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.

    PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.

    Measured: Up to approx. 3.2 years

Secondary outcomes (44)
  1. LGG Cohort: ORR by Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria

    Percentage of participants in the LGG cohort with a best overall confirmed CR or PR as assessed per RANO criteria by investigator assessment. The 95% CIs were computed using two-sided exact binomial method.

    CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.

    PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.

    Measured: Up to approx. 3 years and up to approx 4.2 years

  2. LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria

    Time from first documented response (PR or CR) until disease progression or death as per RANO criteria. Confidence Intervals were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients who had not progressed or died or had received further anticancer therapy, were censored at the date of the last adequate tumor evaluation.

    CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.

    PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.

    Measured: Up to approx. 3 years and up to approx 4.2 years

  3. LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria

    Time from first documented response (PR or CR) until disease progression or death as per RANO criteria. Confidence Intervals were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients who had not progressed or died or had received further anticancer therapy, were censored at the date of the last adequate tumor evaluation.

    CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.

    PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.

    Measured: Up to approx. 3 years and up to approx 4.2 years

  4. LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria

    Time from the date of randomization to the date of first documented disease progression as per central independent review assessment using RANO criteria or death due to any cause. Confidence Intervals were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients who had not progressed or died or had received further anticancer therapy were censored at the date of the last adequate tumor evaluation.

    Measured: Up to approx. 3 years and up to approx 4.2 years

  5. LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Per Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria

    Time from the date of randomization to the date of first documented disease progression as per investigator assessment using RANO criteria or death due to any cause. Confidence Intervals were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients who had not progressed or died or had received further anticancer therapy were censored at the date of the last adequate tumor evaluation.

    Measured: Up to approx. 3 years and up to approx 4.2 years

  6. LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Time to Response (TTR) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria

    Time from randomization to first documented response of CR or PR as per central independent assessment using RANO criteria. CIs were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients without an event were censored either at the maximum follow-up time (if they experienced disease progression or death), or at their last tumor assessment date.

    CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.

    PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.

    Measured: Up to approx. 4.2 years

  7. LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Time to Response (TTR) as Per Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria

    Time from randomization to first documented response of CR or PR as per investigator assessment using RANO criteria. CIs were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients without an event were censored either at the maximum follow-up time (if they experienced disease progression or death), or at their last tumor assessment date.

    CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.

    PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.

    Measured: Up to approx. 4.2 years

  8. LGG Cohort: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria

    Percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR, or stable disease (SD) which lasts for 24 weeks or longer.

    CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.

    PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.

    SD: Partient did not qualify for CR, PR, or progressive disease and has stable nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions on same or lower doses of corticosteroids compared with baseline scan and clinically stable status.

    Measured: Up to approx. 4.2 years

  9. LGG Cohort: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria

    Percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR, or stable disease (SD) which lasts for 24 weeks or longer.

    CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.

    PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.

    SD: Partient did not qualify for CR, PR, or progressive disease and has stable nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions on same or lower doses of corticosteroids compared with baseline scan and clinically stable status.

    Measured: Up to approx. 4.2 years

  10. LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall Survival (OS)

    Time from first dose to death due to any cause in the LGG cohort. Confidence Intervals were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. If a patient was not known to have died at the time of analysis cut-off, OS was censored at the date of last contact.

    Measured: Up to 4.6 years

  11. LGG Cohort: 2-year OS Estimate

    OS was defined as the time from the first dose to death due to any cause in the LGG cohort. The 2-year Kaplan-Meier OS estimate represented the estimated percentage of participants remaining free from OS events for up to 2 years. If a patient was not known to have died at the time of analysis cut-off, OS was censored at the date of last contact

    Measured: 2 years from first dose

  12. HGG Cohort: ORR by Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria

    ORR in the HGG cohort defined as the percentage of participants in the HGG cohort with a best overall confirmed CR or PR as assessed per RANO criteria by investigator assessment. The 95% CIs were computed using two-sided exact binomial method.

    CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.

    PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.

    Measured: Up to approx. 3.2 years and up to approx. 4.8 years

  13. HGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria

    Time from first documented response (PR or CR) until disease progression or death as per central independent assessment using RANO criteria. CIs were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients who had not progressed or died or had received further anticancer therapy were censored at the date of the last adequate tumor evaluation.

    CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.

    PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.

    Measured: Up to approx. 3.2 years and up to approx. 4.8 years

  14. HGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria

    Time from first documented response (PR or CR) until disease progression or death as per investigator assessment using RANO criteria. CIs were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients who had not progressed or died or had received further anticancer therapy were censored at the date of the last adequate tumor evaluation.

    CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.

    PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.

    Measured: Up to approx. 3.2 years and up to approx. 4.8 years

  15. HGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria

    Time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documented disease progression as per central independent review assessment using RANO criteria or death due to any cause. Confidence Intervals were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients who had not progressed or died or had received further anticancer therapy were censored at the date of the last adequate tumor evaluation.

    Measured: Up to approx. 4.8 years

  16. HGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per Investigatort Assessment Using RANO Criteria

    Time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documented disease progression as per investigator assessment using RANO criteria or death due to any cause. Confidence Intervals were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients who had not progressed or died or had received further anticancer therapy were censored at the date of the last adequate tumor evaluation.

    Measured: Up to approx. 4.8 years

  17. HGG Cohort: Time to Response (TTR) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria

    Time from start of treatment to first documented response of CR or PR as per independent assessment using RANO criteria. CIs were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients without an event were censored either at the maximum follow-up time (if they experienced disease progression or death), or at their last tumor assessment date.

    CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.

    PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.

    Measured: Up to approx. 4.8 years

  18. HGG Cohort: Time to Response (TTR) as Per Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria

    Time from start of treatment to first documented response of CR or PR as per investigator assessment using RANO criteria. CIs were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients without an event were censored either at the maximum follow-up time (if they experienced disease progression or death), or at their last tumor assessment date.

    CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.

    PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.

    Measured: Up to approx. 4.8 years

  19. HGG Cohort: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria

    Percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR, or stable disease (SD) which lasts for 24 weeks or longer.

    CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.

    PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.

    SD: Partient did not qualify for CR, PR, or progressive disease and has stable nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions on same or lower doses of corticosteroids compared with baseline scan and clinically stable status.

    Measured: Up to approx. 4.8 years

  20. HGG Cohort: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) as Per Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria

    Percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR, or stable disease (SD) which lasts for 24 weeks or longer.

    CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.

    PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.

    SD: Partient did not qualify for CR, PR, or progressive disease and has stable nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions on same or lower doses of corticosteroids compared with baseline scan and clinically stable status.

    Measured: Up to approx. 4.8 years

  21. HGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall Survival (OS)

    Time from first dose to death due to any cause in the LGG cohort. Confidence Intervals were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. If a patient was not known to have died at the time of analysis cut-off, OS was censored at the date of last contact.

    Measured: Up to 5.1 years

  22. AUClast for Trametinib

    Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. AUClast is the area under the curve (AUC) from time zero to the last measurable concentration sampling time (tlast).

    Measured: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose

  23. Cmax for Trametinib

    PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. Cmax is the maximum plasma drug concentration after single dose administration

    Measured: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose

  24. AUCtau for Trametinib

    PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. AUCtau is the AUC calculated to the end of a dosing interval (tau) at steady-state

    Measured: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose

  25. Tmax for Trametinib

    PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. Tmax is the time to reach maximum plasma concentration. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations.

    Measured: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose

  26. T1/2 for Trametinib

    PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. T1/2 is the elimination half-life

    Measured: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose

  27. Ctrough for Trametinib

    PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. Ctrough is the pre-dose plasma concentration

    Measured: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose

  28. AUClast for Dabrafenib and Its Metabolites (Carboxy-dabrafenib, Desmethyl-dabrafenib Amd Hydroxy-dabrafenib)

    PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. AUClast is the area under the curve (AUC) from time zero to the last measurable concentration sampling time (tlast).

    Measured: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose

  29. Cmax for Dabrafenib and Its Metabolites (Carboxy-dabrafenib, Desmethyl-dabrafenib Amd Hydroxy-dabrafenib)

    PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. Cmax is the maximum plasma drug concentration after single dose administration

    Measured: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose

  30. AUCtau for Dabrafenib and Its Metabolites (Carboxy-dabrafenib, Desmethyl-dabrafenib Amd Hydroxy-dabrafenib)

    PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. AUCtau is the AUC calculated to the end of a dosing interval (tau) at steady-state

    Measured: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose

  31. Tmax for Dabrafenib and Its Metabolites (Carboxy-dabrafenib, Desmethyl-dabrafenib Amd Hydroxy-dabrafenib)

    PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. Tmax is the time to reach maximum plasma concentration. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations.

    Measured: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose

  32. T1/2 for Dabrafenib and Its Metabolites (Carboxy-dabrafenib, Desmethyl-dabrafenib Amd Hydroxy-dabrafenib)

    PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. T1/2 is the elimination half-life

    Measured: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose

  33. Ctrough for Dabrafenib and Its Metabolites (Carboxy-dabrafenib, Desmethyl-dabrafenib Amd Hydroxy-dabrafenib)

    PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. Ctrough is the pre-dose plasma concentration

    Measured: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose

  34. HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Dabrafenib Oral Suspension Based on the Palatability Questionnaire Item: Taste of the Medication Before Rinsing the Mouth

    Participants who received the dabrafenib dispersible tablets for oral suspension completed a questionnaire to evaluate the palatability of the pediatric formulation. After taking the medication, participants provided feedback on how it tasted before rinsing with water, rating their experience as very good, good, neither good nor bad, bad or very bad. The ratings of very good, good, and neither good nor bad were grouped together for reporting purposes.

    Measured: Week 1 and Week 5

  35. HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Trametinib Oral Solution Based on the Palatability Questionnaire Item: Taste of the Medication Before Rinsing the Mouth

    Participants who received the trametinib oral solution completed a questionnaire to evaluate the palatability of the pediatric formulation. After taking the medication, participants provided feedback on how it tasted before rinsing with water, rating their experience as very good, good, neither good nor bad, bad or very bad. The ratings of very good, good, and neither good nor bad were grouped together for reporting purposes.

    Measured: Week 1 and Week 5

  36. HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Dabrafenib Oral Suspension Based on the Palatability Assessment: After- Taste Once the Medication Was Swallowed

    Participants who received the dabrafenib dispersible tablets for oral suspension completed a questionnaire to evaluate the palatability of the pediatric formulation. After taking the medication, participants provided feedback on the after-taste of the medication after the medication was swallowed, rating their experience as very good, good, neither good nor bad, bad or very bad. The ratings of very good, good, and neither good nor bad were grouped together for reporting purposes.

    Measured: Week 1 and Week 5

  37. HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Trametinib Oral Solution Based on the Palatability Assessment: After- Taste Once the Medication Was Swallowed

    Participants who received the trametinib oral solution completed a questionnaire to evaluate the palatability of the pediatric formulation. After taking the medication, participants provided feedback on the after-taste of the medication after the medication was swallowed, rating their experience as very good, good, neither good nor bad, bad or very bad. The ratings of very good, good, and neither good nor bad were grouped together for reporting purposes.

    Measured: Week 1 and Week 5

  38. HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Dabrafenib Oral Suspension Based on the Palatability Questionnaire Item: Immediate Reaction Once the Medication Was Placed Into the Mouth

    Participants who received the dabrafenib dispersible tablets for oral suspension completed a questionnaire to evaluate the palatability of the pediatric formulation. After taking the medication, participants provided feedback on the immediate reaction once the medication was placed into their mouth, rating their experience as very good, good, neither good nor bad, bad or very bad. The ratings of very good, good, and neither good nor bad were grouped together for reporting purposes.

    Measured: Week 1 and Week 5

  39. HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Trametinib Oral Solution Based on the Palatability Assessment: Immediate Reaction Once the Medication Was Placed Into the Mouth

    Participants who received the trametinib oral solution completed a questionnaire to evaluate the palatability of the pediatric formulation. After taking the medication, participants provided feedback on the immediate reaction once the medication was placed into their mouth, rating their experience as very good, good, neither good nor bad, bad or very bad. The ratings of very good, good, and neither good nor bad were grouped together for reporting purposes.

    Measured: Week 1 and Week 5

  40. HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Dabrafenib Oral Suspension Based on the Palatability Questionnaire Item: Remaining After-taste Once Rinsing the Mouth With Water

    Participants who received the dabrafenib dispersible tablets for oral suspension completed a questionnaire to evaluate the palatability of the pediatric formulation. After taking the medication, participants provided feedback on the after-taste of the medication after rinsing with water, rating their experience as very good, good, neither good nor bad, bad or very bad. The ratings of very good, good, and neither good nor bad were grouped together for reporting purposes.

    Measured: Week 1 and Week 5

  41. HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Trametinib Oral Solution Based on the Palatability Assessment: Remaining After-taste Once Rinsing the Mouth With Water

    Participants who received the trametinib oral solution completed a questionnaire to evaluate the palatability of the pediatric formulation. After taking the medication, participants provided feedback on the after-taste of the medication after rinsing with water, rating their experience as very good, good, neither good nor bad, bad or very bad. The ratings of very good, good, and neither good nor bad were grouped together for reporting purposes.

    Measured: Week 1 and Week 5

  42. LGG Cohort: PROMIS Parent Proxy Global Health 7+2 Scores- Global Health Score

    The PROMIS Parent Proxy Global Health 7+2 was used to evaluate the quality of life of participants. The questionnaire included 7 items measuring the global health of the patient. 4 items used a 5-level Likert scale with 1=poor and 5=excellent; 1 item used a 5-level Likert scale with 1=never and 5=always; and 2 items used a 5-level Likert scale with 1=never and 5=almost always. The total raw global health score, ranging from 7 to 35, was computed by summing item values, with higher scores indicating better overall well-being. Raw scores were then transformed into T-scores, standardized with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher T-scores reflected better global health status.

    Participants who discontinued treatment for reasons other than disease progression entered the post-treatment efficacy follow-up phase, where the questionnaire was performed every 16 weeks until disease progression, withdrawal of consent by patient or a parental/legal guardian, or lost to follow-up.

    Measured: Baseline, and Day 1 of Week 5, 8, 16, 24, 32, 49, 48 and 56, and thereafter every 16 weeks until end of treatment (EOT), EOT, and every 16 weeks in the post-treatment efficacy follow-up phase until disease progression (assessed up to 4.6 years)

  43. LGG Cohort: PROMIS Parent Proxy Global Health 7+2 Scores- Pain Score

    The PROMIS Parent Proxy Global Health 7+2 was used to evaluate the quality of life of participants. The questionnaire included 1 item measuring the pain of the participants. Pain item used a 5-level Likert scale with 1= never and 5= almost always, higher scores indicate worsening pain. Raw scores were then converted into T-scores, standardized with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher T-scores indicated more severe pain experiences.

    Participants who discontinued treatment for reasons other than disease progression entered the post-treatment efficacy follow-up phase, where the PROMIS Parent Proxy Global 7+2 Health questionnaire was performed every 16 weeks until disease progression, withdrawal of consent by patient or a parental/legal guardian, or lost to follow-up.

    Measured: Baseline, and Day 1 of Week 5, 8, 16, 24, 32, 49, 48 and 56, and thereafter every 16 weeks until end of treatment (EOT), EOT, and every 16 weeks in the post-treatment efficacy follow-up phase until disease progression (assessed up to 4.6 years)

  44. LGG Cohort: PROMIS Parent Proxy Global Health 7+2 Scores- Fatigue Score

    The PROMIS Parent Proxy Global Health 7+2 was used to evaluate the quality of life of participants. The questionnaire included 1 item measuring the fatigue interference of the participants. Fatigue item used a 5-level Likert scale with 1= never and 5= almost always, higher scores indicate worsening fatigue. Raw scores were then converted into T-scores, standardized with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher T-scores indicated a greater level of reported fatigue.

    Participants who discontinued treatment for reasons other than disease progression entered the post-treatment efficacy follow-up phase, where the PROMIS Parent Proxy Global 7+2 Health questionnaire was performed every 16 weeks until disease progression, withdrawal of consent by patient or a parental/legal guardian, or lost to follow-up.

    Measured: Baseline, and Day 1 of Week 5, 8, 16, 24, 32, 49, 48 and 56, and thereafter every 16 weeks until end of treatment (EOT), EOT, and every 16 weeks in the post-treatment efficacy follow-up phase until disease progression (assessed up to 4.6 years)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Feb 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start28 Dec 2017
  3. Primary completion23 Aug 2021
  4. Study completion28 Apr 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
151 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02684058
Sponsor's protocol ID
CDRB436G2201
Other IDs
2015-004015-20, 2015
Status last verified
Nov 2023
First submitted
4 Feb 2016
Last updated
13 Dec 2023
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

Publications

  • Gascon B, Gauvreau C, Yang A, Bennett J, Nobre L, Tabori U, Hawkins C, Tsang D, Pechlivanoglou P, Denburg A. Cost-Effectiveness of Dabrafenib Plus Trametinib Versus Standard Chemotherapy in BRAFV600E-Mutant Pediatric Low-Grade Glioma. JCO Oncol Pract. 2026 Feb 25:OP2501263. doi: 10.1200/OP-25-01263. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 41740060
  • Bouffet E, Hansford JR, Garre ML, Hara J, Plant-Fox A, Aerts I, Locatelli F, van der Lugt J, Papusha L, Sahm F, Tabori U, Cohen KJ, Packer RJ, Witt O, Sandalic L, Bento Pereira da Silva A, Russo M, Hargrave DR. Dabrafenib plus Trametinib in Pediatric Glioma with BRAF V600 Mutations. N Engl J Med. 2023 Sep 21;389(12):1108-1120. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2303815.

    PubMed 37733309
  • Hargrave DR, Terashima K, Hara J, Kordes UR, Upadhyaya SA, Sahm F, Bouffet E, Packer RJ, Witt O, Sandalic L, Kieloch A, Russo M, Cohen KJ; Investigators involved in the high-grade glioma cohort. Phase II Trial of Dabrafenib Plus Trametinib in Relapsed/Refractory BRAF V600-Mutant Pediatric High-Grade Glioma. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov 20;41(33):5174-5183. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00558. Epub 2023 Aug 29.

    PubMed 37643378
  • Barbato MI, Nashed J, Bradford D, Ren Y, Khasar S, Miller CP, Zolnik BS, Zhao H, Li Y, Bi Y, Shord SS, Amatya AK, Mishra-Kalyani PS, Scepura B, Al-Matari RA, Pazdur R, Kluetz PG, Donoghue M, Singh H, Drezner N. FDA Approval Summary: Dabrafenib in Combination with Trametinib for BRAFV600E Mutation-Positive Low-Grade Glioma. Clin Cancer Res. 2024 Jan 17;30(2):263-268. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-1503.

    PubMed 37610803
  • Shahid S, Kushner BH, Modak S, Basu EM, Rubin EM, Gundem G, Papaemmanuil E, Roberts SS. Association of BRAF V600E mutations with vasoactive intestinal peptide syndrome in MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021 Oct;68(10):e29265. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29265. Epub 2021 Jul 31.

    PubMed 34331515

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Dabrafenib, trametinib and Carboplatin in people with Diffuse Astrocytoma and Anaplastic Astrocytoma, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 57 sites in 20 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 57 sites in United States, Germany, France, Italy, Brazil and 15 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 May 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

LGG Cohort: Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Central Independent Assessment Using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Criteria (time frame: Up to approximately (approx.) 3 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02684058, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Dec 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in