Diffuse AstrocytomaPhase 2NCT02684058
Study of Efficacy and Safety of Dabrafenib in Combination With Trametinib in Pediatric Patients With BRAF V600 Mutation Positive LGG or Relapsed or Refractory HGG Tumors
A Phase 2 study testing Dabrafenib, trametinib and Carboplatin in people with Diffuse Astrocytoma and Anaplastic Astrocytoma, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 57 sites in 20 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study was to investigate the activity of dabrafenib in combination with trametinib in children and adolescent patients with BRAF V600 mutation positive low grade glioma (LGG) or relapsed or refractory high grade glioma (HGG) Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 months to 17 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diffuse Astrocytoma, Anaplastic Astrocytoma, Astrocytoma
- What is being tested?
- Dabrafenib, trametinib and Carboplatin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 151 participants
- Where
- 57 sitesin 20 countries
- Study dates
- 28 Dec 2017to 28 Apr 2023
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 months to 17 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of BRAF V600 mutant High Grade glioma that had relapsed, progressed or failed to respond to frontline therapy
- Diagnosis of BRAF V600 mutant Low Grade glioma with progressive disease following surgical excision, or non-surgical candidates with necessity to begin first systemic treatment because of a risk of neurological impairment with progression.
- Confirmed measurable disease
Who cannot join
- Previous treatment with dabrafenib, trametinib, other RAF inhibitor, other MEK or ERK inhibitor
- HGG patient: Cancer treatment within the past 3 weeks. LGG patient: Any systemic therapy or radiotherapy prior to enrollment
- LGG patients: history of allergic reaction or contraindications to the use of carboplatin or vincristine
- Stem cell transplant within the past 3 months
- History of heart disease
- Pregnant or lactating females
Trial locations and contacts
57 sites in 20 countries.
57 sites in 20 countries
United States10 sites
Johns Hopkins University IDS Pharmacy John Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
Ann and Robert H Lurie Childrens Hospital of Chicago .
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Cincinnati Childrens Hospital Medical Center Cancer & Blood Disease Inst.
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229-3039
Texas Children s Hospital Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, 77030
Indiana University School of Medicine .
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202-2810
St Jude Children's Research Hospital
Memphis, Tennessee, 38105
Nicklaus Childrens Hospital
Miami, Florida, 33155
Children's Hospital of Orange County
Orange, California, 92868
Washington University School of Medicine SC
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Childrens National Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
Germany7 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Augsburg, 86179
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, 13353
Novartis Investigative Site
Cologne, 50937
Novartis Investigative Site
Essen, 45147
Novartis Investigative Site
Göttingen, 37075
Novartis Investigative Site
Hamburg, 20246
Novartis Investigative Site
Heidelberg, 69120
France6 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Lille, 59020
Novartis Investigative Site
Lyon, 69373
Novartis Investigative Site
Paris, 75231
Novartis Investigative Site
Strasbourg, 67000
Novartis Investigative Site
Toulouse, 31059
Novartis Investigative Site
Villejuif, 94800
Italy5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Florence, FI, 50139
Novartis Investigative Site
Genova, GE, 16147
Novartis Investigative Site
Milan, MI, 20133
Novartis Investigative Site
Roma, RM, 00165
Novartis Investigative Site
Torino, TO, 10126
Brazil3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Barretos, São Paulo, 14784 400
Novartis Investigative Site
São Paulo, São Paulo, 04829-310
Novartis Investigative Site
São Paulo, São Paulo, 08270-070
Canada3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1C5
Novartis Investigative Site
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8
Novartis Investigative Site
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H 3V4
Japan3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 812-8582
Novartis Investigative Site
Osaka, 534-0021
Novartis Investigative Site
Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, 157-8535
Spain3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08035
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28009
Novartis Investigative Site
Valencia, 46026
United Kingdom3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Leeds, LS1 3EX
Novartis Investigative Site
Liverpool, L12 2AP
Novartis Investigative Site
London, WC1N 3JH
Australia2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Parkville, Victoria, 3052
Novartis Investigative Site
Randwick, New South Wales, 2130
Czechia2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Brno, 613 00
Novartis Investigative Site
Prague, 150 06
Israel2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Petah Tikva, 49202
Novartis Investigative Site
Tel HaShomer, 52621
About this study
Official title: Phase II Open-label Global Study to Evaluate the Effect of Dabrafenib in Combination With Trametinib in Children and Adolescent Patients With BRAF V600 Mutation Positive Low Grade Glioma (LGG) or Relapsed or Refractory High Grade Glioma (HGG)
The purpose of this study was to investigate the activity of dabrafenib in combination with trametinib in children and adolescent patients with BRAF V600 mutation positive low grade glioma (LGG) or relapsed or refractory high grade glioma (HGG)
Read the detailed description
This study combines two pediatric glioma cohorts (LGG and HGG cohorts) into a multi-center, open-label, Phase II study:
- The LGG cohort is a multi-center, randomized, open-label part of this Phase II study conducted in children and adolescent patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive LGG whose tumor was unresectable and who required first systemic treatment. Participants in the LGG cohort were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to either dabrafenib plus trametinib or carboplatin with vincristine.
- The HGG cohort is a multi-center, single-arm, open-label part of this Phase II study conducted in children and adolescent patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive, refractory or relapsed HGG tumors after having received at least one previous standard therapy.
The duration of treatment for participants on dabrafenib plus trametinib in LGG and for all patients in the HGG cohort was continued until the loss of clinical benefit in the opinion of the Investigator, unacceptable toxicity, start of a new anti-neoplastic therapy, discontinuation at the discretion of the investigator or patient/legal guardian, lost to follow-up, death, study termination by the sponsor, or until disease progression. The duration of treatment for patients in the carboplatin with vincristine arm in LGG cohort was continued for the prescribed number of cycles, as tolerated or until unacceptable toxicity, start of a new anti-neoplastic therapy, discontinuation at the discretion of the investigator or patient/legal guardian, lost to follow-up, death, study is terminated by the sponsor or until disease progression. Participants randomized to the carboplatin with vincristine treatment arm were allowed to cross over to receive dabrafenib in combination with trametinib after centrally confirmed RANO-defined disease progression. Crossover was allowed during the treatment period or the post-treatment period.
After discontinuation of study treatment, all participants (LGG and HGG cohorts) were followed for safety for at least 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. All participants who discontinued study treatment for reasons other than disease progression, death, loss to follow up, or withdrawal of consent moved into the post-treatment efficacy follow-up phase. Finally, all participants were followed for survival once they discontinued study treatment for at least 2 years after the last patient first study treatment (except if consent was withdrawn, death, or the patient was lost to follow-up or discontinued study)
- Conditions
- Diffuse Astrocytoma, Anaplastic Astrocytoma, Astrocytoma, Oligodendroglioma, Childhood, Anaplastic Oligodendroglioma, Glioblastoma
- Being tested
- Dabrafenib, trametinib, Carboplatin, Vincristine
- Keywords
- Malignant glioma, BRAF mutant positive, High grade glioma, Low grade glioma, Dabrafenib, Trametinib, Pediatrics, Brain neoplasma
- Medical subject headings
- Astrocytoma, Oligodendroglioma, Glioblastoma, Ganglioneuroma, Ganglioglioma, Neurocytoma, Glioma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DabrafenibDrug
Also called DRB436
Dabrafenib was available as 50 mg and 75 mg hard capsules and as 10 mg dispersible tablets for oral suspension. Dabrafenib was administered orally, twice daily, and was dosed based on age and weight Patients < 12 years old and ≥ 16 kg were to be administered either the dabrafenib capsules or dabrafenib dispersible tablets for oral suspension (dose: 5.25 mg/kg/day) Patients ≥ 12 years old and ≥ 19 kg were to be administered either the dabrafenib capsules or dabrafenib dispersible tablets for oral suspension (dose: 4.5 mg/kg/day) Patients < 12 years old and < 16 kg were to be administered dabrafenib dispersible tablets for oral suspension (dose: 5.25 mg/kg/day) Patients ≥12 years old and <19 kg were to be administered dabrafenib dispersible tablets for oral suspension (dose: 4.5 mg/kg/day)
trametinibDrug
Also called TMT212
Trametinib was available as 0.5 mg and 2 mg film-coated tablets and as 5.0 mg powder in bottle for oral solution (0.05 mg/ml after reconstitution with 90 ml water).Trametinib was administered orally, once daily in combination with the first daily dose of dabrafenib and was dosed based on age and weight.
Patients <6 years old and <26 kg were to be administered the trametinib oral solution (dose: 0.032 mg/kg/day) Patients <6 years old and ≥26 kg were to be administered either the trametinib oral solution or trametinib tablets (dose: 0.032 mg/kg/day) Patients ≥6 years old and ≥10 kg < 33 kg were to be administered the trametinib oral solution (dose: 0.025 mg/kg/day) Patients ≥6 years old and ≥33 kg were to be administered either the trametinib oral solution or the trametinib tablets (dose: 0.025 mg/kg/day)
CarboplatinDrug
Carboplatin was supplied locally as commercially available and labelled accordingly to comply with legal requirements of each country. Carboplatin was administered as one course of induction (10 weeks of chemotherapy with 2 weeks of rest), followed by 8 cycles of maintenance chemotherapy. Each maintenance cycle was 6 weeks, and consisted of 4 weeks of chemotherapy with 2 weeks of rest.
Induction: 175 mg/m^2 as weekly intravenous (IV) infusion on weeks 1 to 4, and on weeks 7 to 10, on the same day as vincristine dosing Maintenance: 175 mg/m^2 as weekly IV infusion over 60 minutes on weeks 1 to 4 of each cycle.
VincristineDrug
Vincristine was supplied locally as commercially available and labelled accordingly to comply with legal requirements of each country. Vincristine was administered as one course of induction (10 weeks of chemotherapy with 2 weeks of rest), followed by 8 cycles of maintenance chemotherapy.
Induction: 1.5 mg/m^2 as weekly IV bolus infusion (0.05 mg/kg if child is <12 kg) (maximum dose of 2.0 mg) for 10 weeks.
Maintenance: 1.5 mg/m^2 as weekly IV bolus infusion (0.05 mg/kg if child is <12 kg) (maximum dose of 2.0 mg) on weeks 1 to 3 of each cycle, on the same day as carboplatin dosing.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| LGG cohort: dabrafenib and trametinib | Experimental | Participants in the LGG cohort randomized to receive dabrafenib (orally, twice daily and dosed based on weight and age) in combination with trametinib (orally, once daily in combination with the first daily dose of dabrafenib and was dosed based on weight) Receives: Drug: Dabrafenib; Drug: trametinib |
| LGG cohort: carboplatin and vincristine | Active comparator | Participants in the LGG cohort randomized to receive active comparator chemotherapy (carboplatin and vincristine). Participants received one course of induction (10 weeks of chemotherapy with 2 weeks of rest), followed by 8 cycles of maintenance chemotherapy. Receives: Drug: Carboplatin; Drug: Vincristine |
| HGG cohort: dabrafenib and trametinib | Experimental | Participants in the HGG cohort received dabrafenib (orally, twice daily and dosed based on weight and age) and trametinib (orally, once daily in combination with the first daily dose of dabrafenib and dosed based on weight) Receives: Drug: Dabrafenib; Drug: trametinib |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
LGG Cohort: Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Central Independent Assessment Using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Criteria
Percentage of participants in the LGG cohort with a best overall confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) as assessed per RANO criteria by central independent assessment. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using two-sided exact binomial method.
CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.
PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
Measured: Up to approximately (approx.) 3 years
HGG Cohort: Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Percentage of participants in the HGG cohort with a best overall confirmed CR or PR as assessed per RANO criteria by central independent assessment. The 95% CIs were computed using two-sided exact binomial method.
CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.
PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
Measured: Up to approx. 3.2 years
Secondary outcomes (44)
LGG Cohort: ORR by Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Percentage of participants in the LGG cohort with a best overall confirmed CR or PR as assessed per RANO criteria by investigator assessment. The 95% CIs were computed using two-sided exact binomial method.
CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.
PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
Measured: Up to approx. 3 years and up to approx 4.2 years
LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time from first documented response (PR or CR) until disease progression or death as per RANO criteria. Confidence Intervals were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients who had not progressed or died or had received further anticancer therapy, were censored at the date of the last adequate tumor evaluation.
CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.
PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
Measured: Up to approx. 3 years and up to approx 4.2 years
LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time from first documented response (PR or CR) until disease progression or death as per RANO criteria. Confidence Intervals were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients who had not progressed or died or had received further anticancer therapy, were censored at the date of the last adequate tumor evaluation.
CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.
PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
Measured: Up to approx. 3 years and up to approx 4.2 years
LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time from the date of randomization to the date of first documented disease progression as per central independent review assessment using RANO criteria or death due to any cause. Confidence Intervals were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients who had not progressed or died or had received further anticancer therapy were censored at the date of the last adequate tumor evaluation.
Measured: Up to approx. 3 years and up to approx 4.2 years
LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Per Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time from the date of randomization to the date of first documented disease progression as per investigator assessment using RANO criteria or death due to any cause. Confidence Intervals were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients who had not progressed or died or had received further anticancer therapy were censored at the date of the last adequate tumor evaluation.
Measured: Up to approx. 3 years and up to approx 4.2 years
LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Time to Response (TTR) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time from randomization to first documented response of CR or PR as per central independent assessment using RANO criteria. CIs were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients without an event were censored either at the maximum follow-up time (if they experienced disease progression or death), or at their last tumor assessment date.
CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.
PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
Measured: Up to approx. 4.2 years
LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Time to Response (TTR) as Per Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time from randomization to first documented response of CR or PR as per investigator assessment using RANO criteria. CIs were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients without an event were censored either at the maximum follow-up time (if they experienced disease progression or death), or at their last tumor assessment date.
CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.
PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
Measured: Up to approx. 4.2 years
LGG Cohort: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR, or stable disease (SD) which lasts for 24 weeks or longer.
CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.
PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
SD: Partient did not qualify for CR, PR, or progressive disease and has stable nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions on same or lower doses of corticosteroids compared with baseline scan and clinically stable status.
Measured: Up to approx. 4.2 years
LGG Cohort: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR, or stable disease (SD) which lasts for 24 weeks or longer.
CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.
PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
SD: Partient did not qualify for CR, PR, or progressive disease and has stable nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions on same or lower doses of corticosteroids compared with baseline scan and clinically stable status.
Measured: Up to approx. 4.2 years
LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall Survival (OS)
Time from first dose to death due to any cause in the LGG cohort. Confidence Intervals were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. If a patient was not known to have died at the time of analysis cut-off, OS was censored at the date of last contact.
Measured: Up to 4.6 years
LGG Cohort: 2-year OS Estimate
OS was defined as the time from the first dose to death due to any cause in the LGG cohort. The 2-year Kaplan-Meier OS estimate represented the estimated percentage of participants remaining free from OS events for up to 2 years. If a patient was not known to have died at the time of analysis cut-off, OS was censored at the date of last contact
Measured: 2 years from first dose
HGG Cohort: ORR by Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
ORR in the HGG cohort defined as the percentage of participants in the HGG cohort with a best overall confirmed CR or PR as assessed per RANO criteria by investigator assessment. The 95% CIs were computed using two-sided exact binomial method.
CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.
PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
Measured: Up to approx. 3.2 years and up to approx. 4.8 years
HGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time from first documented response (PR or CR) until disease progression or death as per central independent assessment using RANO criteria. CIs were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients who had not progressed or died or had received further anticancer therapy were censored at the date of the last adequate tumor evaluation.
CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.
PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
Measured: Up to approx. 3.2 years and up to approx. 4.8 years
HGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time from first documented response (PR or CR) until disease progression or death as per investigator assessment using RANO criteria. CIs were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients who had not progressed or died or had received further anticancer therapy were censored at the date of the last adequate tumor evaluation.
CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.
PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
Measured: Up to approx. 3.2 years and up to approx. 4.8 years
HGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documented disease progression as per central independent review assessment using RANO criteria or death due to any cause. Confidence Intervals were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients who had not progressed or died or had received further anticancer therapy were censored at the date of the last adequate tumor evaluation.
Measured: Up to approx. 4.8 years
HGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per Investigatort Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documented disease progression as per investigator assessment using RANO criteria or death due to any cause. Confidence Intervals were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients who had not progressed or died or had received further anticancer therapy were censored at the date of the last adequate tumor evaluation.
Measured: Up to approx. 4.8 years
HGG Cohort: Time to Response (TTR) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time from start of treatment to first documented response of CR or PR as per independent assessment using RANO criteria. CIs were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients without an event were censored either at the maximum follow-up time (if they experienced disease progression or death), or at their last tumor assessment date.
CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.
PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
Measured: Up to approx. 4.8 years
HGG Cohort: Time to Response (TTR) as Per Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time from start of treatment to first documented response of CR or PR as per investigator assessment using RANO criteria. CIs were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients without an event were censored either at the maximum follow-up time (if they experienced disease progression or death), or at their last tumor assessment date.
CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.
PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
Measured: Up to approx. 4.8 years
HGG Cohort: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR, or stable disease (SD) which lasts for 24 weeks or longer.
CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.
PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
SD: Partient did not qualify for CR, PR, or progressive disease and has stable nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions on same or lower doses of corticosteroids compared with baseline scan and clinically stable status.
Measured: Up to approx. 4.8 years
HGG Cohort: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) as Per Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR, or stable disease (SD) which lasts for 24 weeks or longer.
CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.
PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
SD: Partient did not qualify for CR, PR, or progressive disease and has stable nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions on same or lower doses of corticosteroids compared with baseline scan and clinically stable status.
Measured: Up to approx. 4.8 years
HGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall Survival (OS)
Time from first dose to death due to any cause in the LGG cohort. Confidence Intervals were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. If a patient was not known to have died at the time of analysis cut-off, OS was censored at the date of last contact.
Measured: Up to 5.1 years
AUClast for Trametinib
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. AUClast is the area under the curve (AUC) from time zero to the last measurable concentration sampling time (tlast).
Measured: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose
Cmax for Trametinib
PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. Cmax is the maximum plasma drug concentration after single dose administration
Measured: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose
AUCtau for Trametinib
PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. AUCtau is the AUC calculated to the end of a dosing interval (tau) at steady-state
Measured: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose
Tmax for Trametinib
PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. Tmax is the time to reach maximum plasma concentration. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations.
Measured: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose
T1/2 for Trametinib
PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. T1/2 is the elimination half-life
Measured: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose
Ctrough for Trametinib
PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. Ctrough is the pre-dose plasma concentration
Measured: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose
AUClast for Dabrafenib and Its Metabolites (Carboxy-dabrafenib, Desmethyl-dabrafenib Amd Hydroxy-dabrafenib)
PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. AUClast is the area under the curve (AUC) from time zero to the last measurable concentration sampling time (tlast).
Measured: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose
Cmax for Dabrafenib and Its Metabolites (Carboxy-dabrafenib, Desmethyl-dabrafenib Amd Hydroxy-dabrafenib)
PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. Cmax is the maximum plasma drug concentration after single dose administration
Measured: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose
AUCtau for Dabrafenib and Its Metabolites (Carboxy-dabrafenib, Desmethyl-dabrafenib Amd Hydroxy-dabrafenib)
PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. AUCtau is the AUC calculated to the end of a dosing interval (tau) at steady-state
Measured: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose
Tmax for Dabrafenib and Its Metabolites (Carboxy-dabrafenib, Desmethyl-dabrafenib Amd Hydroxy-dabrafenib)
PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. Tmax is the time to reach maximum plasma concentration. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations.
Measured: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose
T1/2 for Dabrafenib and Its Metabolites (Carboxy-dabrafenib, Desmethyl-dabrafenib Amd Hydroxy-dabrafenib)
PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. T1/2 is the elimination half-life
Measured: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose
Ctrough for Dabrafenib and Its Metabolites (Carboxy-dabrafenib, Desmethyl-dabrafenib Amd Hydroxy-dabrafenib)
PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. Ctrough is the pre-dose plasma concentration
Measured: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose
HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Dabrafenib Oral Suspension Based on the Palatability Questionnaire Item: Taste of the Medication Before Rinsing the Mouth
Participants who received the dabrafenib dispersible tablets for oral suspension completed a questionnaire to evaluate the palatability of the pediatric formulation. After taking the medication, participants provided feedback on how it tasted before rinsing with water, rating their experience as very good, good, neither good nor bad, bad or very bad. The ratings of very good, good, and neither good nor bad were grouped together for reporting purposes.
Measured: Week 1 and Week 5
HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Trametinib Oral Solution Based on the Palatability Questionnaire Item: Taste of the Medication Before Rinsing the Mouth
Participants who received the trametinib oral solution completed a questionnaire to evaluate the palatability of the pediatric formulation. After taking the medication, participants provided feedback on how it tasted before rinsing with water, rating their experience as very good, good, neither good nor bad, bad or very bad. The ratings of very good, good, and neither good nor bad were grouped together for reporting purposes.
Measured: Week 1 and Week 5
HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Dabrafenib Oral Suspension Based on the Palatability Assessment: After- Taste Once the Medication Was Swallowed
Participants who received the dabrafenib dispersible tablets for oral suspension completed a questionnaire to evaluate the palatability of the pediatric formulation. After taking the medication, participants provided feedback on the after-taste of the medication after the medication was swallowed, rating their experience as very good, good, neither good nor bad, bad or very bad. The ratings of very good, good, and neither good nor bad were grouped together for reporting purposes.
Measured: Week 1 and Week 5
HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Trametinib Oral Solution Based on the Palatability Assessment: After- Taste Once the Medication Was Swallowed
Participants who received the trametinib oral solution completed a questionnaire to evaluate the palatability of the pediatric formulation. After taking the medication, participants provided feedback on the after-taste of the medication after the medication was swallowed, rating their experience as very good, good, neither good nor bad, bad or very bad. The ratings of very good, good, and neither good nor bad were grouped together for reporting purposes.
Measured: Week 1 and Week 5
HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Dabrafenib Oral Suspension Based on the Palatability Questionnaire Item: Immediate Reaction Once the Medication Was Placed Into the Mouth
Participants who received the dabrafenib dispersible tablets for oral suspension completed a questionnaire to evaluate the palatability of the pediatric formulation. After taking the medication, participants provided feedback on the immediate reaction once the medication was placed into their mouth, rating their experience as very good, good, neither good nor bad, bad or very bad. The ratings of very good, good, and neither good nor bad were grouped together for reporting purposes.
Measured: Week 1 and Week 5
HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Trametinib Oral Solution Based on the Palatability Assessment: Immediate Reaction Once the Medication Was Placed Into the Mouth
Participants who received the trametinib oral solution completed a questionnaire to evaluate the palatability of the pediatric formulation. After taking the medication, participants provided feedback on the immediate reaction once the medication was placed into their mouth, rating their experience as very good, good, neither good nor bad, bad or very bad. The ratings of very good, good, and neither good nor bad were grouped together for reporting purposes.
Measured: Week 1 and Week 5
HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Dabrafenib Oral Suspension Based on the Palatability Questionnaire Item: Remaining After-taste Once Rinsing the Mouth With Water
Participants who received the dabrafenib dispersible tablets for oral suspension completed a questionnaire to evaluate the palatability of the pediatric formulation. After taking the medication, participants provided feedback on the after-taste of the medication after rinsing with water, rating their experience as very good, good, neither good nor bad, bad or very bad. The ratings of very good, good, and neither good nor bad were grouped together for reporting purposes.
Measured: Week 1 and Week 5
HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Trametinib Oral Solution Based on the Palatability Assessment: Remaining After-taste Once Rinsing the Mouth With Water
Participants who received the trametinib oral solution completed a questionnaire to evaluate the palatability of the pediatric formulation. After taking the medication, participants provided feedback on the after-taste of the medication after rinsing with water, rating their experience as very good, good, neither good nor bad, bad or very bad. The ratings of very good, good, and neither good nor bad were grouped together for reporting purposes.
Measured: Week 1 and Week 5
LGG Cohort: PROMIS Parent Proxy Global Health 7+2 Scores- Global Health Score
The PROMIS Parent Proxy Global Health 7+2 was used to evaluate the quality of life of participants. The questionnaire included 7 items measuring the global health of the patient. 4 items used a 5-level Likert scale with 1=poor and 5=excellent; 1 item used a 5-level Likert scale with 1=never and 5=always; and 2 items used a 5-level Likert scale with 1=never and 5=almost always. The total raw global health score, ranging from 7 to 35, was computed by summing item values, with higher scores indicating better overall well-being. Raw scores were then transformed into T-scores, standardized with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher T-scores reflected better global health status.
Participants who discontinued treatment for reasons other than disease progression entered the post-treatment efficacy follow-up phase, where the questionnaire was performed every 16 weeks until disease progression, withdrawal of consent by patient or a parental/legal guardian, or lost to follow-up.
Measured: Baseline, and Day 1 of Week 5, 8, 16, 24, 32, 49, 48 and 56, and thereafter every 16 weeks until end of treatment (EOT), EOT, and every 16 weeks in the post-treatment efficacy follow-up phase until disease progression (assessed up to 4.6 years)
LGG Cohort: PROMIS Parent Proxy Global Health 7+2 Scores- Pain Score
The PROMIS Parent Proxy Global Health 7+2 was used to evaluate the quality of life of participants. The questionnaire included 1 item measuring the pain of the participants. Pain item used a 5-level Likert scale with 1= never and 5= almost always, higher scores indicate worsening pain. Raw scores were then converted into T-scores, standardized with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher T-scores indicated more severe pain experiences.
Participants who discontinued treatment for reasons other than disease progression entered the post-treatment efficacy follow-up phase, where the PROMIS Parent Proxy Global 7+2 Health questionnaire was performed every 16 weeks until disease progression, withdrawal of consent by patient or a parental/legal guardian, or lost to follow-up.
Measured: Baseline, and Day 1 of Week 5, 8, 16, 24, 32, 49, 48 and 56, and thereafter every 16 weeks until end of treatment (EOT), EOT, and every 16 weeks in the post-treatment efficacy follow-up phase until disease progression (assessed up to 4.6 years)
LGG Cohort: PROMIS Parent Proxy Global Health 7+2 Scores- Fatigue Score
The PROMIS Parent Proxy Global Health 7+2 was used to evaluate the quality of life of participants. The questionnaire included 1 item measuring the fatigue interference of the participants. Fatigue item used a 5-level Likert scale with 1= never and 5= almost always, higher scores indicate worsening fatigue. Raw scores were then converted into T-scores, standardized with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher T-scores indicated a greater level of reported fatigue.
Participants who discontinued treatment for reasons other than disease progression entered the post-treatment efficacy follow-up phase, where the PROMIS Parent Proxy Global 7+2 Health questionnaire was performed every 16 weeks until disease progression, withdrawal of consent by patient or a parental/legal guardian, or lost to follow-up.
Measured: Baseline, and Day 1 of Week 5, 8, 16, 24, 32, 49, 48 and 56, and thereafter every 16 weeks until end of treatment (EOT), EOT, and every 16 weeks in the post-treatment efficacy follow-up phase until disease progression (assessed up to 4.6 years)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Study start28 Dec 2017
- Primary completion23 Aug 2021
- Study completion28 Apr 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diffuse AstrocytomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 151 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Study director, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02684058
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDRB436G2201
- Other IDs
- 2015-004015-20, 2015
- Status last verified
- Nov 2023
- First submitted
- 4 Feb 2016
- Last updated
- 13 Dec 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Publications
Gascon B, Gauvreau C, Yang A, Bennett J, Nobre L, Tabori U, Hawkins C, Tsang D, Pechlivanoglou P, Denburg A. Cost-Effectiveness of Dabrafenib Plus Trametinib Versus Standard Chemotherapy in BRAFV600E-Mutant Pediatric Low-Grade Glioma. JCO Oncol Pract. 2026 Feb 25:OP2501263. doi: 10.1200/OP-25-01263. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 41740060Bouffet E, Hansford JR, Garre ML, Hara J, Plant-Fox A, Aerts I, Locatelli F, van der Lugt J, Papusha L, Sahm F, Tabori U, Cohen KJ, Packer RJ, Witt O, Sandalic L, Bento Pereira da Silva A, Russo M, Hargrave DR. Dabrafenib plus Trametinib in Pediatric Glioma with BRAF V600 Mutations. N Engl J Med. 2023 Sep 21;389(12):1108-1120. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2303815.
PubMed 37733309Hargrave DR, Terashima K, Hara J, Kordes UR, Upadhyaya SA, Sahm F, Bouffet E, Packer RJ, Witt O, Sandalic L, Kieloch A, Russo M, Cohen KJ; Investigators involved in the high-grade glioma cohort. Phase II Trial of Dabrafenib Plus Trametinib in Relapsed/Refractory BRAF V600-Mutant Pediatric High-Grade Glioma. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov 20;41(33):5174-5183. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00558. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
PubMed 37643378Barbato MI, Nashed J, Bradford D, Ren Y, Khasar S, Miller CP, Zolnik BS, Zhao H, Li Y, Bi Y, Shord SS, Amatya AK, Mishra-Kalyani PS, Scepura B, Al-Matari RA, Pazdur R, Kluetz PG, Donoghue M, Singh H, Drezner N. FDA Approval Summary: Dabrafenib in Combination with Trametinib for BRAFV600E Mutation-Positive Low-Grade Glioma. Clin Cancer Res. 2024 Jan 17;30(2):263-268. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-1503.
PubMed 37610803Shahid S, Kushner BH, Modak S, Basu EM, Rubin EM, Gundem G, Papaemmanuil E, Roberts SS. Association of BRAF V600E mutations with vasoactive intestinal peptide syndrome in MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021 Oct;68(10):e29265. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29265. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
PubMed 34331515
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Dec 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase II Open-label Global Study to Evaluate the Effect of Dabrafenib in Combination With Trametinib in Children and Adolescent Patients With BRAF V600 Mutation Positive Low Grade Glioma (LGG) or Relapsed or Refractory High Grade Glioma (HGG)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02684058
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDRB436G2201
- Conditions
- Diffuse Astrocytoma, Anaplastic Astrocytoma, Astrocytoma, Oligodendroglioma, Childhood, Anaplastic Oligodendroglioma, Glioblastoma
- Keywords
- Malignant glioma, BRAF mutant positive, High grade glioma, Low grade glioma, Dabrafenib, Trametinib, Pediatrics, Brain neoplasma
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 151 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 28 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 23 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Apr 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 19 May 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the activity of dabrafenib in combination with trametinib in children and adolescent patients with BRAF V600 mutation positive low grade glioma (LGG) or relapsed or refractory high grade glioma (HGG)
Detailed description
This study combines two pediatric glioma cohorts (LGG and HGG cohorts) into a multi-center, open-label, Phase II study:
- The LGG cohort is a multi-center, randomized, open-label part of this Phase II study conducted in children and adolescent patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive LGG whose tumor was unresectable and who required first systemic treatment. Participants in the LGG cohort were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to either dabrafenib plus trametinib or carboplatin with vincristine.
- The HGG cohort is a multi-center, single-arm, open-label part of this Phase II study conducted in children and adolescent patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive, refractory or relapsed HGG tumors after having received at least one previous standard therapy.
The duration of treatment for participants on dabrafenib plus trametinib in LGG and for all patients in the HGG cohort was continued until the loss of clinical benefit in the opinion of the Investigator, unacceptable toxicity, start of a new anti-neoplastic therapy, discontinuation at the discretion of the investigator or patient/legal guardian, lost to follow-up, death, study termination by the sponsor, or until disease progression. The duration of treatment for patients in the carboplatin with vincristine arm in LGG cohort was continued for the prescribed number of cycles, as tolerated or until unacceptable toxicity, start of a new anti-neoplastic therapy, discontinuation at the discretion of the investigator or patient/legal guardian, lost to follow-up, death, study is terminated by the sponsor or until disease progression. Participants randomized to the carboplatin with vincristine treatment arm were allowed to cross over to receive dabrafenib in combination with trametinib after centrally confirmed RANO-defined disease progression. Crossover was allowed during the treatment period or the post-treatment period.
After discontinuation of study treatment, all participants (LGG and HGG cohorts) were followed for safety for at least 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. All participants who discontinued study treatment for reasons other than disease progression, death, loss to follow up, or withdrawal of consent moved into the post-treatment efficacy follow-up phase. Finally, all participants were followed for survival once they discontinued study treatment for at least 2 years after the last patient first study treatment (except if consent was withdrawn, death, or the patient was lost to follow-up or discontinued study)
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| LGG cohort: dabrafenib and trametinib | Experimental | Drug: Dabrafenib, Drug: trametinibParticipants in the LGG cohort randomized to receive dabrafenib (orally, twice daily and dosed based on weight and age) in combination with trametinib (orally, once daily in combination with the first daily dose of dabrafenib and was dosed based on weight) |
| LGG cohort: carboplatin and vincristine | Active comparator | Drug: Carboplatin, Drug: VincristineParticipants in the LGG cohort randomized to receive active comparator chemotherapy (carboplatin and vincristine). Participants received one course of induction (10 weeks of chemotherapy with 2 weeks of rest), followed by 8 cycles of maintenance chemotherapy. |
| HGG cohort: dabrafenib and trametinib | Experimental | Drug: Dabrafenib, Drug: trametinibParticipants in the HGG cohort received dabrafenib (orally, twice daily and dosed based on weight and age) and trametinib (orally, once daily in combination with the first daily dose of dabrafenib and dosed based on weight) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 months to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Diagnosis of BRAF V600 mutant High Grade glioma that had relapsed, progressed or failed to respond to frontline therapy
- Diagnosis of BRAF V600 mutant Low Grade glioma with progressive disease following surgical excision, or non-surgical candidates with necessity to begin first systemic treatment because of a risk of neurological impairment with progression.
- Confirmed measurable disease
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Previous treatment with dabrafenib, trametinib, other RAF inhibitor, other MEK or ERK inhibitor
- HGG patient: Cancer treatment within the past 3 weeks. LGG patient: Any systemic therapy or radiotherapy prior to enrollment
- LGG patients: history of allergic reaction or contraindications to the use of carboplatin or vincristine
- Stem cell transplant within the past 3 months
- History of heart disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DabrafenibAlso: DRB436Dabrafenib was available as 50 mg and 75 mg hard capsules and as 10 mg dispersible tablets for oral suspension. Dabrafenib was administered orally, twice daily, and was dosed based on age and weight Patients < 12 years old and ≥ 16 kg were to be administered either the dabrafenib capsules or dabrafenib dispersible tablets for oral suspension (dose: 5.25 mg/kg/day) Patients ≥ 12 years old and ≥ 19 kg were to be administered either the dabrafenib capsules or dabrafenib dispersible tablets for oral suspension (dose: 4.5 mg/kg/day) Patients < 12 years old and < 16 kg were to be administered dabrafenib dispersible tablets for oral suspension (dose: 5.25 mg/kg/day) Patients ≥12 years old and <19 kg were to be administered dabrafenib dispersible tablets for oral suspension (dose: 4.5 mg/kg/day) | Drug | HGG cohort: dabrafenib and trametinib, LGG cohort: dabrafenib and trametinib |
| trametinibAlso: TMT212Trametinib was available as 0.5 mg and 2 mg film-coated tablets and as 5.0 mg powder in bottle for oral solution (0.05 mg/ml after reconstitution with 90 ml water).Trametinib was administered orally, once daily in combination with the first daily dose of dabrafenib and was dosed based on age and weight. Patients <6 years old and <26 kg were to be administered the trametinib oral solution (dose: 0.032 mg/kg/day) Patients <6 years old and ≥26 kg were to be administered either the trametinib oral solution or trametinib tablets (dose: 0.032 mg/kg/day) Patients ≥6 years old and ≥10 kg < 33 kg were to be administered the trametinib oral solution (dose: 0.025 mg/kg/day) Patients ≥6 years old and ≥33 kg were to be administered either the trametinib oral solution or the trametinib tablets (dose: 0.025 mg/kg/day) | Drug | HGG cohort: dabrafenib and trametinib, LGG cohort: dabrafenib and trametinib |
| CarboplatinCarboplatin was supplied locally as commercially available and labelled accordingly to comply with legal requirements of each country. Carboplatin was administered as one course of induction (10 weeks of chemotherapy with 2 weeks of rest), followed by 8 cycles of maintenance chemotherapy. Each maintenance cycle was 6 weeks, and consisted of 4 weeks of chemotherapy with 2 weeks of rest. Induction: 175 mg/m^2 as weekly intravenous (IV) infusion on weeks 1 to 4, and on weeks 7 to 10, on the same day as vincristine dosing Maintenance: 175 mg/m^2 as weekly IV infusion over 60 minutes on weeks 1 to 4 of each cycle. | Drug | LGG cohort: carboplatin and vincristine |
| VincristineVincristine was supplied locally as commercially available and labelled accordingly to comply with legal requirements of each country. Vincristine was administered as one course of induction (10 weeks of chemotherapy with 2 weeks of rest), followed by 8 cycles of maintenance chemotherapy. Induction: 1.5 mg/m^2 as weekly IV bolus infusion (0.05 mg/kg if child is <12 kg) (maximum dose of 2.0 mg) for 10 weeks. Maintenance: 1.5 mg/m^2 as weekly IV bolus infusion (0.05 mg/kg if child is <12 kg) (maximum dose of 2.0 mg) on weeks 1 to 3 of each cycle, on the same day as carboplatin dosing. | Drug | LGG cohort: carboplatin and vincristine |
Primary outcome
LGG Cohort: Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Central Independent Assessment Using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Criteria
Time frame: Up to approximately (approx.) 3 years
Percentage of participants in the LGG cohort with a best overall confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) as assessed per RANO criteria by central independent assessment. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using two-sided exact binomial method. CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses. PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
HGG Cohort: Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 3.2 years
Percentage of participants in the HGG cohort with a best overall confirmed CR or PR as assessed per RANO criteria by central independent assessment. The 95% CIs were computed using two-sided exact binomial method. CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses. PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
44 secondary outcomes
LGG Cohort: ORR by Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 3 years and up to approx 4.2 years
LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 3 years and up to approx 4.2 years
LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 3 years and up to approx 4.2 years
LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 3 years and up to approx 4.2 years
LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Per Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 3 years and up to approx 4.2 years
LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Time to Response (TTR) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 4.2 years
LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Time to Response (TTR) as Per Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 4.2 years
LGG Cohort: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 4.2 years
LGG Cohort: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 4.2 years
LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: Up to 4.6 years
LGG Cohort: 2-year OS Estimate
Time frame: 2 years from first dose
HGG Cohort: ORR by Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 3.2 years and up to approx. 4.8 years
HGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 3.2 years and up to approx. 4.8 years
HGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 3.2 years and up to approx. 4.8 years
HGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 4.8 years
HGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per Investigatort Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 4.8 years
HGG Cohort: Time to Response (TTR) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 4.8 years
HGG Cohort: Time to Response (TTR) as Per Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 4.8 years
HGG Cohort: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 4.8 years
HGG Cohort: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) as Per Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 4.8 years
HGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: Up to 5.1 years
AUClast for Trametinib
Time frame: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose
Cmax for Trametinib
Time frame: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose
AUCtau for Trametinib
Time frame: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose
Tmax for Trametinib
Time frame: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose
T1/2 for Trametinib
Time frame: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose
Ctrough for Trametinib
Time frame: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose
AUClast for Dabrafenib and Its Metabolites (Carboxy-dabrafenib, Desmethyl-dabrafenib Amd Hydroxy-dabrafenib)
Time frame: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose
Cmax for Dabrafenib and Its Metabolites (Carboxy-dabrafenib, Desmethyl-dabrafenib Amd Hydroxy-dabrafenib)
Time frame: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose
AUCtau for Dabrafenib and Its Metabolites (Carboxy-dabrafenib, Desmethyl-dabrafenib Amd Hydroxy-dabrafenib)
Time frame: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose
Tmax for Dabrafenib and Its Metabolites (Carboxy-dabrafenib, Desmethyl-dabrafenib Amd Hydroxy-dabrafenib)
Time frame: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose
T1/2 for Dabrafenib and Its Metabolites (Carboxy-dabrafenib, Desmethyl-dabrafenib Amd Hydroxy-dabrafenib)
Time frame: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose
Ctrough for Dabrafenib and Its Metabolites (Carboxy-dabrafenib, Desmethyl-dabrafenib Amd Hydroxy-dabrafenib)
Time frame: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose
HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Dabrafenib Oral Suspension Based on the Palatability Questionnaire Item: Taste of the Medication Before Rinsing the Mouth
Time frame: Week 1 and Week 5
HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Trametinib Oral Solution Based on the Palatability Questionnaire Item: Taste of the Medication Before Rinsing the Mouth
Time frame: Week 1 and Week 5
HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Dabrafenib Oral Suspension Based on the Palatability Assessment: After- Taste Once the Medication Was Swallowed
Time frame: Week 1 and Week 5
HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Trametinib Oral Solution Based on the Palatability Assessment: After- Taste Once the Medication Was Swallowed
Time frame: Week 1 and Week 5
HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Dabrafenib Oral Suspension Based on the Palatability Questionnaire Item: Immediate Reaction Once the Medication Was Placed Into the Mouth
Time frame: Week 1 and Week 5
HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Trametinib Oral Solution Based on the Palatability Assessment: Immediate Reaction Once the Medication Was Placed Into the Mouth
Time frame: Week 1 and Week 5
HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Dabrafenib Oral Suspension Based on the Palatability Questionnaire Item: Remaining After-taste Once Rinsing the Mouth With Water
Time frame: Week 1 and Week 5
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Dec 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41740060Gascon B, Gauvreau C, Yang A, Bennett J, Nobre L, Tabori U, Hawkins C, Tsang D, Pechlivanoglou P, Denburg A. Cost-Effectiveness of Dabrafenib Plus Trametinib Versus Standard Chemotherapy in BRAFV600E-Mutant Pediatric Low-Grade Glioma. JCO Oncol Pract. 2026 Feb 25:OP2501263. doi: 10.1200/OP-25-01263. Online ahead of print.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37733309Bouffet E, Hansford JR, Garre ML, Hara J, Plant-Fox A, Aerts I, Locatelli F, van der Lugt J, Papusha L, Sahm F, Tabori U, Cohen KJ, Packer RJ, Witt O, Sandalic L, Bento Pereira da Silva A, Russo M, Hargrave DR. Dabrafenib plus Trametinib in Pediatric Glioma with BRAF V600 Mutations. N Engl J Med. 2023 Sep 21;389(12):1108-1120. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2303815.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37643378Hargrave DR, Terashima K, Hara J, Kordes UR, Upadhyaya SA, Sahm F, Bouffet E, Packer RJ, Witt O, Sandalic L, Kieloch A, Russo M, Cohen KJ; Investigators involved in the high-grade glioma cohort. Phase II Trial of Dabrafenib Plus Trametinib in Relapsed/Refractory BRAF V600-Mutant Pediatric High-Grade Glioma. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov 20;41(33):5174-5183. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00558. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37610803Barbato MI, Nashed J, Bradford D, Ren Y, Khasar S, Miller CP, Zolnik BS, Zhao H, Li Y, Bi Y, Shord SS, Amatya AK, Mishra-Kalyani PS, Scepura B, Al-Matari RA, Pazdur R, Kluetz PG, Donoghue M, Singh H, Drezner N. FDA Approval Summary: Dabrafenib in Combination with Trametinib for BRAFV600E Mutation-Positive Low-Grade Glioma. Clin Cancer Res. 2024 Jan 17;30(2):263-268. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-1503.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34331515Shahid S, Kushner BH, Modak S, Basu EM, Rubin EM, Gundem G, Papaemmanuil E, Roberts SS. Association of BRAF V600E mutations with vasoactive intestinal peptide syndrome in MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021 Oct;68(10):e29265. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29265. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Related trials for Diffuse Astrocytoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Pediatric Trial of Indoximod With Chemotherapy and Radiation for Relapsed Brain Tumors or Newly Diagnosed DIPG
Glioblastoma, Medulloblastoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
IL-8 Receptor-modified CD70 CAR T Cell Therapy in CD70+ Newly Diagnosed and Recurrent Pediatric High-grade Glioma (pHGG) and Newly Diagnosed Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma (ndDIPG)
High-grade Glioma, Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Immune Modulatory DC Vaccine Against Brain Tumor
Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma or Glioblastoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of SRN-101 Gene Therapy in Adults With Recurrent High-Grade Glioma (ALERT-1)
Recurrent High Grade Gliomas, Glioblastoma (GBM)
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
Intrathecal Azacitidine and Nivolumab in Patients With Recurrent High-grade Glioma
Glioblastoma (GBM), Diffuse Midline Glioma (DMG)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals study director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
57 sites in 20 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Dabrafenib, trametinib and Carboplatin in people with Diffuse Astrocytoma and Anaplastic Astrocytoma, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 57 sites in 20 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 57 sites in United States, Germany, France, Italy, Brazil and 15 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 May 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
LGG Cohort: Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Central Independent Assessment Using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Criteria (time frame: Up to approximately (approx.) 3 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02684058, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Dec 2023.