SepsisPhase 3ViDISSNCT02684487
Vitamin D Status in Patients With Severe Sepsis
A Phase 3 study testing vitamin D3 in people with Sepsis and Severe Sepsis, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Sepsis is a clinical entity that complicates infection. Without early recognition and timely management, it can rapidly progress to severe sepsis, septic shock, and culminate in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Sepsis, Severe Sepsis, End Organ Damage
- What is being tested?
- vitamin D3
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Dec 2017to Dec 2022
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥18 to <80 years
- Admitted to 1 of 4 participating ICUs
- Meet criteria for new-onset severe sepsis* within past 12 hours
Who cannot join
- Age ≥80 years
- Not anticipated to survive ≥48 hours
- Inability to obtain informed consent from patient/suitable proxy within 22 hours of new-onset severe sepsis
- Comfort measures, hospice, or palliative care status
- Documented adverse reaction to vitamin D supplementation
- Inability to tolerate enteral feeds/medications
Show all 10Show fewer
- Renal stones within past year
- Hypercalcemia within past year
- Baseline serum calcium ≥10.5 mg/dL
- Established diagnosis of medical condition associated with high risk of hypercalcemia (e.g. metastatic cancer, sarcoidosis, multiple myeloma, primary hyperparathyroidism)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
About this study
Official title: Vitamin D Status in Patients With Severe Sepsis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Sepsis is a clinical entity that complicates infection. Without early recognition and timely management, it can rapidly progress to severe sepsis, septic shock, and culminate in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Forty to 70% of septic patients have low vitamin D status, yet little is known about the impact of vitamin D3 (vitD3) supplementation in this patient population. As such, the investigators propose a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial to test the hypothesis that early, rapid correction of low vitamin D status, as an adjunct to established treatment guidelines, will improve clinical outcomes and measurably alter immune profile in patients with severe sepsis.
Read the detailed description
Sepsis is a clinical entity that complicates infections [1]. Without early recognition and timely management, it can rapidly progress to severe sepsis, septic shock, and culminate in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. The incidence of severe sepsis is between 300 to 1000 cases per 100,000 persons [2] and is projected to increase annually due to an aging population, increasing burden of chronic disease, and greater use of invasive procedures, chemotherapy, and immunosuppressive agents [3]. Severe sepsis is the leading cause of mortality in critically ill patients, with healthcare costs exceeding $16 billion annually [4]. Despite evolving clinical guidelines for sepsis [5-7], and intense research, only a modest reduction in case fatality rates has been documented over the last two decades [8]. Aside from early administration of antibiotics, there is no effective stand-alone or adjuvant pharmacological intervention to improve survival in patients with severe sepsis.
The degree of immune dysfunction precipitated by an inciting infection is thought to correlate with the severity of sepsis. Recently, key cells of the immune system were shown to express the vitamin D receptor (VDR) [9]. Additionally, macrophages and neutrophils activated through VDR up-regulate expression of endogenous antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) that are active against a broad spectrum of infectious agents [10]. AMPs, influenced by vitamin D status, likely represent an important first-line of defense against microbial invasion. While circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) is the most abundant vitamin D metabolite [11], under normal circumstances, 85-90% of 25OHD is tightly bound to vitamin D binding protein (DBP) and is unavailable to activate innate immune responses during acute stress [12]. The remaining 10-15% is more readily bioavailable (b25OHD), and is composed of the free and albumin-bound components of 25OHD. Fluid loading, albumin wasting, and increased DBP expression during critical illness may affect 25OHD homeostasis [13].
Low vitamin D status (25OHD <20ng/mL) is associated with increased mortality in critical illness [14]. Forty to 70% of septic patients have low vitamin D status [15-17], yet little is known about the impact of vitamin D3 (vitD3) supplementation in this patient population. As such, the investigators propose a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial to test the hypothesis that early, rapid correction of low vitamin D status, as an adjunct to established treatment guidelines, will improve clinical outcomes and measurably alter immune profile in patients with severe sepsis. Patients will be assigned to a single dose of vitD3 (400,000 IU) or placebo (n=300/arm) within 24 hours of new-onset severe sepsis, followed by weekly doses of vitD3 (25,000 IU) or placebo, respectively, up to 90 days to assess clinical outcomes and key biomarkers.
AIM 1: To determine if early administration of vitD3 (vs placebo) improves clinical outcomes in patients with low vitamin D status and severe sepsis. Hypothesis 1a: Early vitD3 decreases 90-day mortality after onset of severe sepsis (Primary Outcome). Hypothesis 1b: Early vitD3 decreases sequential organ failure assessment scores in the first 5 days after onset of severe sepsis. Hypothesis 1c: Early vitD3 decreases non-home discharge rate in those who survive severe sepsis.
AIM 2: To determine if early administration of vitD3 (vs placebo) modulates b25OHD, AMPs, and key cytokines in patients with low vitamin D status and severe sepsis. Hypothesis 2a: Early vitD3 increases b25OHD in the first 5 days after the onset of severe sepsis. Hypothesis 2b: Early vitD3 increases expression of AMPs, cathelicidin (LL-37) and β-defensin (hBD-2). Hypothesis 2c: Early vitD3 decreases pro-inflammatory cytokine (IL-1β, IL-6) and increases anti-immunoparalytic cytokine (IL-10, IFN-γ) expression.
Severe sepsis is a significant public health problem with limited treatment options. A 2010 NIH workshop on sepsis identified deep gaps in understanding innate host immune responses in sepsis and emphasized the need for novel therapies [18]. The proposed trial is well powered to investigate whether immunomodulation with vitD3 improves survival after severe sepsis. By optimizing endogenous host responses to infection, the investigators anticipate that vitD3 supplementation will augment the life-saving impact of current therapies for severe sepsis. Moreover, the investigators will investigate several vitamin D-related biomarkers, which may identify future therapeutic targets. The trial will be performed by a highly-experienced team that includes experts in vitamin D, sepsis, critical care, and clinical trials; they have successfully carried out several clinical studies of vitamin D in critically ill patients.
- Conditions
- Sepsis, Severe Sepsis, End Organ Damage, Multi Organ Failure
- Being tested
- vitamin D3, Placebo
- Keywords
- vitamin D, vitamin D3, sepsis, severe sepsis, critical illness, ICU
- Medical subject headings
- Sepsis, Multiple Organ Failure, Critical Illness
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
vitamin D3Drug
Also called cholecalciferol
Patients will be given 400,000 IU of vitamin D3 within 24 hours of severe sepsis onset followed by weekly doses of 25,000 IU until 90 days or death, whichever comes first.
PlaceboDrug
Also called sugar pill, sham comparator
Patients will be given placebo within 24 hours of severe sepsis onset followed by weekly doses of placebo until 90 days or death, whichever comes first.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| vitamin D3 | Active comparator | Patients will be given single dose of vitamin D3 within 24 hours of new-onset severe sepsis, followed by weekly doses of vitD3 (25,000 IU) up to 90 days to assess clinical outcomes and key biomarkers. Receives: Drug: vitamin D3 |
| Placebo | Sham comparator | Patients will be given placebo intervention within 24 hours of new onset severe sepsis followed by or placebo for up to 90 days to assess clinical outcomes and key biomarkers. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
90 day mortality
90 day mortality will be assessed in patients included in the study
Measured: 90 day mortality
Secondary outcomes (4)
Serum b25OHD: Baseline serum b25OHD and serum b25OHD after intervention, until hospital day 5
b25 OHD will be measured in the first 5 days after the onset of severe sepsis
Measured: 24h of severe sepsis onset until hospital day 5
Serum measurement of AMPs, cathelicidin, and B-defensin: Baseline serum AMPs, cathelicidin, and B-defensin and AMPs, cathelicidin, and B-defensin after intervention, until hospital day 5
AMPs, Cathelicidin and B-defensin will be measured in the first 5 days after the onset of severe sepsis
Measured: 24h of severe sepsis onset until hospital day 5
Serum measurement of cytokines: Baseline serum cytokines and serum cytokines after intervention, until hospital day 5
IL1B, IL-6, IL-10 and IFN-y will be measured in the first 5 days after the onset of severe sepsis
Measured: 24h of severe sepsis onset until hospital day 5
sequential organ failure assessment scores in the first 5 day after severe sepsis onset
SOFA scores will be taken within the first 5 days of onset of severe sepsis in patients enrolled
Measured: 24h of severe sepsis onset until hospital day 5
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2017 (estimated)
- Primary completionJul 2022 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2022 (estimated)
Why it stopped: PI left institution. Protocol not submitted to IRB, contract not executed, and study was not done.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for SepsisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Massachusetts General HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sadeq A Quraishi, MD, Principal investigator, Massachusetts General Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02684487
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ViDISS_temp
- Acronym
- ViDISS
- Status last verified
- Apr 2021
- First submitted
- 9 Feb 2016
- Last updated
- 5 May 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 May 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Vitamin D Status in Patients With Severe Sepsis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02684487
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ViDISS / ViDISS_temp
- Conditions
- Sepsis, Severe Sepsis, End Organ Damage, Multi Organ Failure
- Keywords
- vitamin D, vitamin D3, sepsis, severe sepsis, critical illness, ICU
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: PI left institution. Protocol not submitted to IRB, contract not executed, and study was not done.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2017 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Sepsis is a clinical entity that complicates infection. Without early recognition and timely management, it can rapidly progress to severe sepsis, septic shock, and culminate in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Forty to 70% of septic patients have low vitamin D status, yet little is known about the impact of vitamin D3 (vitD3) supplementation in this patient population. As such, the investigators propose a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial to test the hypothesis that early, rapid correction of low vitamin D status, as an adjunct to established treatment guidelines, will improve clinical outcomes and measurably alter immune profile in patients with severe sepsis.
Detailed description
Sepsis is a clinical entity that complicates infections [1]. Without early recognition and timely management, it can rapidly progress to severe sepsis, septic shock, and culminate in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. The incidence of severe sepsis is between 300 to 1000 cases per 100,000 persons [2] and is projected to increase annually due to an aging population, increasing burden of chronic disease, and greater use of invasive procedures, chemotherapy, and immunosuppressive agents [3]. Severe sepsis is the leading cause of mortality in critically ill patients, with healthcare costs exceeding $16 billion annually [4]. Despite evolving clinical guidelines for sepsis [5-7], and intense research, only a modest reduction in case fatality rates has been documented over the last two decades [8]. Aside from early administration of antibiotics, there is no effective stand-alone or adjuvant pharmacological intervention to improve survival in patients with severe sepsis.
The degree of immune dysfunction precipitated by an inciting infection is thought to correlate with the severity of sepsis. Recently, key cells of the immune system were shown to express the vitamin D receptor (VDR) [9]. Additionally, macrophages and neutrophils activated through VDR up-regulate expression of endogenous antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) that are active against a broad spectrum of infectious agents [10]. AMPs, influenced by vitamin D status, likely represent an important first-line of defense against microbial invasion. While circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) is the most abundant vitamin D metabolite [11], under normal circumstances, 85-90% of 25OHD is tightly bound to vitamin D binding protein (DBP) and is unavailable to activate innate immune responses during acute stress [12]. The remaining 10-15% is more readily bioavailable (b25OHD), and is composed of the free and albumin-bound components of 25OHD. Fluid loading, albumin wasting, and increased DBP expression during critical illness may affect 25OHD homeostasis [13].
Low vitamin D status (25OHD <20ng/mL) is associated with increased mortality in critical illness [14]. Forty to 70% of septic patients have low vitamin D status [15-17], yet little is known about the impact of vitamin D3 (vitD3) supplementation in this patient population. As such, the investigators propose a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial to test the hypothesis that early, rapid correction of low vitamin D status, as an adjunct to established treatment guidelines, will improve clinical outcomes and measurably alter immune profile in patients with severe sepsis. Patients will be assigned to a single dose of vitD3 (400,000 IU) or placebo (n=300/arm) within 24 hours of new-onset severe sepsis, followed by weekly doses of vitD3 (25,000 IU) or placebo, respectively, up to 90 days to assess clinical outcomes and key biomarkers.
AIM 1: To determine if early administration of vitD3 (vs placebo) improves clinical outcomes in patients with low vitamin D status and severe sepsis. Hypothesis 1a: Early vitD3 decreases 90-day mortality after onset of severe sepsis (Primary Outcome). Hypothesis 1b: Early vitD3 decreases sequential organ failure assessment scores in the first 5 days after onset of severe sepsis. Hypothesis 1c: Early vitD3 decreases non-home discharge rate in those who survive severe sepsis.
AIM 2: To determine if early administration of vitD3 (vs placebo) modulates b25OHD, AMPs, and key cytokines in patients with low vitamin D status and severe sepsis. Hypothesis 2a: Early vitD3 increases b25OHD in the first 5 days after the onset of severe sepsis. Hypothesis 2b: Early vitD3 increases expression of AMPs, cathelicidin (LL-37) and β-defensin (hBD-2). Hypothesis 2c: Early vitD3 decreases pro-inflammatory cytokine (IL-1β, IL-6) and increases anti-immunoparalytic cytokine (IL-10, IFN-γ) expression.
Severe sepsis is a significant public health problem with limited treatment options. A 2010 NIH workshop on sepsis identified deep gaps in understanding innate host immune responses in sepsis and emphasized the need for novel therapies [18]. The proposed trial is well powered to investigate whether immunomodulation with vitD3 improves survival after severe sepsis. By optimizing endogenous host responses to infection, the investigators anticipate that vitD3 supplementation will augment the life-saving impact of current therapies for severe sepsis. Moreover, the investigators will investigate several vitamin D-related biomarkers, which may identify future therapeutic targets. The trial will be performed by a highly-experienced team that includes experts in vitamin D, sepsis, critical care, and clinical trials; they have successfully carried out several clinical studies of vitamin D in critically ill patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| vitamin D3 | Active comparator | Drug: vitamin D3Patients will be given single dose of vitamin D3 within 24 hours of new-onset severe sepsis, followed by weekly doses of vitD3 (25,000 IU) up to 90 days to assess clinical outcomes and key biomarkers. |
| Placebo | Sham comparator | Drug: PlaceboPatients will be given placebo intervention within 24 hours of new onset severe sepsis followed by or placebo for up to 90 days to assess clinical outcomes and key biomarkers. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age ≥18 to <80 years
- Admitted to 1 of 4 participating ICUs
- Meet criteria for new-onset severe sepsis* within past 12 hours
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Age ≥80 years
- Not anticipated to survive ≥48 hours
- Inability to obtain informed consent from patient/suitable proxy within 22 hours of new-onset severe sepsis
- Comfort measures, hospice, or palliative care status
- Documented adverse reaction to vitamin D supplementation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| vitamin D3Also: cholecalciferolPatients will be given 400,000 IU of vitamin D3 within 24 hours of severe sepsis onset followed by weekly doses of 25,000 IU until 90 days or death, whichever comes first. | Drug | vitamin D3 |
| PlaceboAlso: sugar pill, sham comparatorPatients will be given placebo within 24 hours of severe sepsis onset followed by weekly doses of placebo until 90 days or death, whichever comes first. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
90 day mortality
Time frame: 90 day mortality
90 day mortality will be assessed in patients included in the study
4 secondary outcomes
Serum b25OHD: Baseline serum b25OHD and serum b25OHD after intervention, until hospital day 5
Time frame: 24h of severe sepsis onset until hospital day 5
Serum measurement of AMPs, cathelicidin, and B-defensin: Baseline serum AMPs, cathelicidin, and B-defensin and AMPs, cathelicidin, and B-defensin after intervention, until hospital day 5
Time frame: 24h of severe sepsis onset until hospital day 5
Serum measurement of cytokines: Baseline serum cytokines and serum cytokines after intervention, until hospital day 5
Time frame: 24h of severe sepsis onset until hospital day 5
sequential organ failure assessment scores in the first 5 day after severe sepsis onset
Time frame: 24h of severe sepsis onset until hospital day 5
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 May 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Sepsis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Pivotal Safety and Immunogenicity GBS-NN/NN2 Vaccine Maternal Immunisation Trial
Streptococcus Agalactiae Infection, Neonatal Sepsis
Active, not recruiting
CT for Personalized Mechanical Ventilation
Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, Sepsis Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 4
A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Extended and Intermittent Infusion of Beta-lactams in Critically Ill Paediatric Patients
Infection, Sepsis
Not yet recruiting
Double Plasma Separation and Adsorption in Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (DPMAS-ACLF Trial)
Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF)
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Thymosin Alpha 1 and IgM Levels in Sepsis
Sepsis, Septic Shock
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sadeq A Quraishi, MD principal investigator
Massachusetts General Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing vitamin D3 in people with Sepsis and Severe Sepsis, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
90 day mortality (time frame: 90 day mortality). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 May 2021.