Constipation Predominant Irritable Bowel SyndromePhase 3T3MPO-2NCT02686138
A 26-Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tenapanor in IBS-C
A Phase 3 study testing Tenapanor in people with Constipation Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome, run by Ardelyx at 117 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This phase 3, 26-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of one dose of Tenapanor in subjects with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-C) as defined by the ROME III criteria and who have active disease as determined after a… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Constipation Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Tenapanor
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 593 participants
- Where
- 117 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Dec 2015to Oct 2017
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Males or females aged 18 to 75 years, inclusive
- Females must be of non-childbearing potential; If of child-bearing potential, must have negative pregnancy test and confirm the use of one of the appropriate means of contraception
- Males must agree to use appropriate methods of barrier contraception or have documented surgical sterilization
- Subject meets definition of IBS-C using Rome III Criteria for the Diagnosis of IBS
- A colonoscopy based on AGA guidelines; every 10 years at ≥50 years old
Who cannot join
- Functional diarrhea as defined by Rome III criteria
- IBS with diarrhea (IBS-D), mixed IBS (IBS-M), or unsubtyped IBS as defined by Rome III criteria
- Diagnosis or treatment of any clinically symptomatic biochemical or structural abnormality of the GI tract within 6 months prior to screening, or active disease within 6 months prior to screening; including but not limited to cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, diverticulitis, duodenal ulcer, erosive esophagitis, gastric ulcer, pancreatitis (within 12 months of screening), cholelithiasis, amyloidosis, ileus, non-controlled GERD, gastrointestinal obstruction or carcinoid syndrome.
- Potential CNS cause of constipation (e.g., Parkinson's disease, spinal cord injury, or multiple sclerosis)
- Subject has a history or current evidence of laxative abuse (in the clinical judgment of physician)
- Hepatic dysfunction (ALT [SGPT] or AST [SGOT] >2.5 times the upper limit of normal) or renal impairment (serum creatinine >2 mg/dL)
- Any evidence of or treatment of malignancy (other than localized basal cell, squamous cell skin cancer or cancer in situ that has been resected) within the previous year
- Any surgery on the stomach, small intestine or colon, excluding appendectomy and cholecystectomy (unless within 60 days of screening visit)
Trial locations and contacts
117 sites in 1 country.
117 sites in 1 country
United States117 sites
Ardelyx Investigative Site 222
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102
Ardelyx Investigative Site 264
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106
Ardelyx Investigative Site 163
Anaheim, California, 92801
Ardelyx Investigative Site 260
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106
Ardelyx Investigative Site 160
Annapolis, Maryland, 21401
Ardelyx Investigative Site 138
Atlanta, Georgia, 30312
Ardelyx Investigative Site 148
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
Ardelyx Investigative Site 253
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
Ardelyx Investigative Site 271
Bangor, Maine, 04401
Ardelyx Investigative Site 172
Beavercreek, Ohio, 45432
Ardelyx Investigative Site 156
Billings, Montana, 59102
Ardelyx Investigative Site 221
Biloxi, Mississippi, 39531
Ardelyx Investigative Site 176
Brandon, Florida, 33511
Ardelyx Investigative Site 212
Bristol, Connecticut, 06010
Ardelyx Investigative Site 267
Brockton, Massachusetts, 02302
Ardelyx Investigative Site 230
Brooklyn, New York, 11206
Ardelyx Investigative Site 283
Buckley, Michigan, 49620
Ardelyx Investigative Site 268
Burr Ridge, Illinois, 60527
Ardelyx Investigative Site 105
Canoga Park, California, 91303
Ardelyx Investigative Site 180
Channelview, Texas, 77530
Ardelyx Investigative Site 217
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37404
Ardelyx Investigative Site 143
Chula Vista, California, 91910
Ardelyx Investigative Site 204
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45212
Ardelyx Investigative Site 201
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45234
Ardelyx Investigative Site 252
Columbia, South Carolina, 29204
Ardelyx Investigative Site 292
Conway, Arkansas, 72034
Ardelyx Investigative Site 178
Cutler Bay, Florida, 33157
Ardelyx Investigative Site 173
Dayton, Ohio, 45429
Ardelyx Investigative Site 272
Decatur, Georgia, 30032
Ardelyx Investigative Site 229
Decatur, Georgia, 30033
Ardelyx Investigative Site 257
Dothan, Alabama, 36305
Ardelyx Investigative Site 248
East Providence, Rhode Island, 02914
Ardelyx Investigative Site 147
Encino, California, 91436
Ardelyx Investigative Site 218
Evansville, Indiana, 47714
Ardelyx Investigative Site 227
Evergreen Park, Illinois, 60805
Ardelyx Investigative Site 205
Fayetteville, North Carolina, 28304
Ardelyx Investigative Site 239
Flint, Michigan, 48504
Ardelyx Investigative Site 200
Foley, Alabama, 36535
Ardelyx Investigative Site 208
Franklin, Ohio, 45005
Ardelyx Investigative Site 121
Franklin, Tennessee, 37064
Ardelyx Investigative Site 265
Gaffney, South Carolina, 29341
Ardelyx Investigative Site 170
Great Neck, New York, 11023
Ardelyx Investigative Site 190
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27408
Ardelyx Investigative Site 189
Hermitage, Tennessee, 37076
Ardelyx Investigative Site 136
Hialeah, Florida, 33012
Ardelyx Investigative Site 130
Hialeah, Florida, 33016
Ardelyx Investigative Site 194
Hickory, North Carolina, 28601
Ardelyx Investigative Site 291
Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 60169
Ardelyx Investigative Site 286
Houston, Texas, 77036
Ardelyx Investigative Site 262
Houston, Texas, 77043
Ardelyx Investigative Site 185
Houston, Texas, 77079
Ardelyx Investigative Site 171
Huber Heights, Ohio, 45424
Ardelyx Investigative Site 103
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801
Ardelyx Investigative Site 244
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801
Ardelyx Investigative Site 251
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801
Ardelyx Investigative Site 100
Huntsville, Alabama, 35802
Ardelyx Investigative Site 133
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305
Ardelyx Investigative Site 282
Jefferson City, Missouri, 65109
Ardelyx Investigative Site 109
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37909
Ardelyx Investigative Site 297
La Mesa, California, 91942
Ardelyx Investigative Site 284
La Mirada, California, 90638
Ardelyx Investigative Site 182
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89128
Ardelyx Investigative Site 220
Levittown, Pennsylvania, 19056
Ardelyx Investigative Site 219
Lima, Ohio, 45806
Ardelyx Investigative Site 122
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72212
Ardelyx Investigative Site 107
Lomita, California, 90717
Ardelyx Investigative Site 165
Long Beach, California, 90807
Ardelyx Investigative Site 191
Lynn Haven, Florida, 32444
Ardelyx Investigative Site 158
Madisonville, Kentucky, 42431
Ardelyx Investigative Site 270
Mandeville, Louisiana, 70471
Ardelyx Investigative Site 250
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
Ardelyx Investigative Site 214
Marrero, Louisiana, 70072
Ardelyx Investigative Site 113
McKinney, Texas, 75071
Ardelyx Investigative Site 266
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119
Ardelyx Investigative Site 154
Metairie, Louisiana, 70006
Ardelyx Investigative Site 288
Miami, Florida, 33144
Ardelyx Investigative Site 106
Miami, Florida, 33186
Ardelyx Investigative Site 127
Miami Lakes, Florida, 33014
Ardelyx Investigative Site 195
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26505
Ardelyx Investigative Site 235
Nashville, Tennessee, 37211
Ardelyx Investigative Site 203
New Hyde Park, New York, 11040
Ardelyx Investigative Site 137
Norcross, Georgia, 30071
Ardelyx Investigative Site 249
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502
Ardelyx Investigative Site 231
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507
Ardelyx Investigative Site 202
Oak Lawn, Illinois, 60453
Ardelyx Investigative Site 236
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103
Ardelyx Investigative Site 211
Orange, California, 92868
Ardelyx Investigative Site 179
Orlando, Florida, 32803
Ardelyx Investigative Site 258
Petersburg, Virginia, 23805
Ardelyx Investigative Site 210
Phoenix, Arizona, 85018
Ardelyx Investigative Site 296
Phoenix, Arizona, 85018
Ardelyx Investigative Site 263
Port Arthur, Texas, 77640
Ardelyx Investigative Site 246
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57702
Ardelyx Investigative Site 167
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84102
Ardelyx Investigative Site 181
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Ardelyx Investigative Site 186
San Antonio, Texas, 78258
Ardelyx Investigative Site 209
Saraland, Alabama, 36571
Ardelyx Investigative Site 213
Savannah, Georgia, 31406
Ardelyx Investigative Site 195
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71103
Ardelyx Investigative Site 261
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57108
Ardelyx Investigative Site 124
Snellville, Georgia, 30078
Ardelyx Investigative Site 242
Spokane, Washington, 99202
Ardelyx Investigative Site 279
Spring Hill, Tennessee, 37174
Ardelyx Investigative Site 228
St Louis, Missouri, 63042
Ardelyx Investigative Site 290
Tampa, Florida, 33607
Ardelyx Investigative Site 255
Towson, Maryland, 21204
Ardelyx Investigative Site 168
Troy, Michigan, 48098
Ardelyx Investigative Site 269
Tucson, Arizona, 85704
Ardelyx Investigative Site 256
Tucson, Arizona, 85710
Ardelyx Investigative Site 273
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74135
Ardelyx Investigative Site 175
Vineland, New Jersey, 08360
Ardelyx Investigative Site 245
Virginia Beach, Virginia, 23462
Ardelyx Investigative Site 232
Wadsworth, Ohio, 44281
Ardelyx Investigative Site 254
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409
Ardelyx Investigative Site 233
Wheat Ridge, Colorado, 80033
Ardelyx Investigative Site 285
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401
Ardelyx Investigative Site 216
Wyoming, Michigan, 49519
About this study
Official title: A 26-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tenapanor for the Treatment of Constipation-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS-C)
This phase 3, 26-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of one dose of Tenapanor in subjects with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-C) as defined by the ROME III criteria and who have active disease as determined after a two-week screening period. Subjects who qualify and are randomized into the study will either receive 50mg BID of Tenapanor (1:1) for a 26 week treatment period.
Read the detailed description
During the 26-week double-blind treatment period, subjects will record daily assessments including: frequency and timing of bowel movements; sensation of complete bowel emptying; consistency of bowel movements; degree of straining, worst abdominal pain, abdominal discomfort, abdominal bloating, abdominal fullness and abdominal cramping; and use and timing of rescue medication. Subjects will also record weekly assessments including: adequate relief of IBS symptoms, degree of relief of IBS symptoms, IBS severity, and constipation severity.
- Being tested
- Tenapanor, Placebo
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TenapanorDrug
Also called RDX5791, AZD1722
PlaceboDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 50mg BID | Experimental | Tenapanor, 50mg BID (100mg total) Receives: Drug: Tenapanor |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Subjects With Overall Response for 6 Out of 12 Weeks
An overall responder is defined as a weekly responder for the first 6/12 weeks where both CSBM and abdominal pain response criteria were met for the week. The CSBM response criteria are defined as an increase of one or more change in average weekly CSBMs from baseline. The definition of a CSBM is as follows: A CSBM is a spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) for which the subject responds "yes" to the following question; "Did you feel like you completely emptied your bowels?" The abdominal pain response criterion is defined as a decrease of 30% or more of percent change in average weekly worst abdominal pain from baseline.
Measured: First 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (8)
Percentage of Subjects With Overall Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) Response for 6 Out of 12 Weeks
An overall CSBM responder is defined as a weekly responder for the first 6/12 weeks. The CSBM response criteria are defined as an increase of one or more change in average weekly CSBMs from baseline. The definition of a CSBM is as follows: A CSBM is a spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) for which the subject responds "yes" to the following question; "Did you feel like you completely emptied your bowels?"
Measured: First 12 weeks
Percentage of Subjects With Overall Abdominal Pain Response for 6 Out of 12 Weeks
An overall abdominal pain responder is defined as a weekly responder for the first 6/12 weeks. The abdominal pain response criterion is defined as a decrease of 30% or more of percent change in average weekly worst abdominal pain from baseline.
Measured: First 12 weeks
Percentage of Subjects With Overall Response for 13 Out of 26 Weeks
An overall responder is defined as a weekly responder for the first 13/26 weeks where both CSBM and abdominal pain response criteria were met for the week. The CSBM response criteria are defined as an increase of one or more change in average weekly CSBMs from baseline. The definition of a CSBM is as follows: A CSBM is a spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) for which the subject responds "yes" to the following question; "Did you feel like you completely emptied your bowels?" The abdominal pain response criterion is defined as a decrease of 30% or more of percent change in average weekly worst abdominal pain from baseline.
Measured: 26 weeks
Percentage of Subjects With Overall Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) Response for 13 Out of 26 Weeks
An overall CSBM responder is defined as a weekly responder for the first 13/26 weeks. The CSBM response criteria are defined as an increase of one or more change in average weekly CSBMs from baseline. The definition of a CSBM is as follows: A CSBM is a spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) for which the subject responds "yes" to the following question; "Did you feel like you completely emptied your bowels?"
Measured: 26 weeks
Percentage of Subjects With Overall Abdominal Pain Response for 13 Out of 26 Weeks
An overall abdominal pain responder is defined as a weekly responder for the first 13/26 weeks. The abdominal pain response criterion is defined as a decrease of 30% or more of percent change in average weekly worst abdominal pain from baseline.
Measured: 26 weeks
Percentage of Subjects With Overall Response for 9 Out of 12 Weeks
An overall responder is defined as a weekly responder for the first 9/12 weeks where both CSBM and abdominal pain response criteria were met for the week. The CSBM response criteria are defined as an increase of one or more change in average weekly CSBMs from baseline and a minimum of at least 3 CSBMs that same week. The definition of a CSBM is as follows: A CSBM is a spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) for which the subject responds "yes" to the following question; "Did you feel like you completely emptied your bowels?" The abdominal pain response criterion is defined as a decrease of 30% or more of percent change in average weekly worst abdominal pain from baseline.
Measured: First 12 weeks
Percentage of Subjects With Overall Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) Response for 9 Out of 12 Weeks
An overall CSBM responder is defined as a weekly responder for the first 9/12 weeks. The CSBM response criteria are defined as an increase of one or more change in average weekly CSBMs from baseline and a minimum of at least 3 CSBMs that same week. The definition of a CSBM is as follows: A CSBM is a spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) for which the subject responds "yes" to the following question; "Did you feel like you completely emptied your bowels?"
Measured: First 12 weeks
Percentage of Subjects With Overall Abdominal Pain Response for 9 Out of 12 Weeks
An overall abdominal pain responder is defined as a weekly responder for the first 9/12 weeks. The abdominal pain response criterion is defined as a decrease of 30% or more of percent change in average weekly worst abdominal pain from baseline.
Measured: First 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2015
- Primary completionAug 2017
- Study completionOct 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Constipation Predominant Irritable Bowel SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 593 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ardelyx
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- David P Rosenbaum, Ph.D., Study chair, Ardelyx, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02686138
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TEN-01-302
- Acronym
- T3MPO-2
- Status last verified
- Apr 2020
- First submitted
- 11 Jan 2016
- Last updated
- 22 Apr 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Lacy BE, Shin AS, Cangemi DJ, Yang Y, Zhao S, Rosenbaum DP. Tenapanor is associated with earlier and sustained symptom relief in IBS-C: a post hoc analysis. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2026 Jan 24;19:17562848251414831. doi: 10.1177/17562848251414831. eCollection 2026.
PubMed 41601848Lembo AJ, Friedenberg KA, Fogel RP, Edelstein S, Zhao S, Yang Y, Rosenbaum DP, Chey WD. Long-term safety of tenapanor in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation in the T3MPO-3 study. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023 Nov;35(11):e14658. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14658. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
PubMed 37668173Chey WD, Lembo AJ, Yang Y, Rosenbaum DP. Efficacy of Tenapanor in Treating Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation: A 26-Week, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Trial (T3MPO-2). Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun 1;116(6):1294-1303. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001056.
PubMed 33337659
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Apr 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A 26-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tenapanor for the Treatment of Constipation-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS-C)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02686138
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- T3MPO-2 / TEN-01-302
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 593 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- ArdelyxIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Dec 2015
- Primary completion
- Aug 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 13 Apr 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This phase 3, 26-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of one dose of Tenapanor in subjects with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-C) as defined by the ROME III criteria and who have active disease as determined after a two-week screening period. Subjects who qualify and are randomized into the study will either receive 50mg BID of Tenapanor (1:1) for a 26 week treatment period.
Detailed description
During the 26-week double-blind treatment period, subjects will record daily assessments including: frequency and timing of bowel movements; sensation of complete bowel emptying; consistency of bowel movements; degree of straining, worst abdominal pain, abdominal discomfort, abdominal bloating, abdominal fullness and abdominal cramping; and use and timing of rescue medication. Subjects will also record weekly assessments including: adequate relief of IBS symptoms, degree of relief of IBS symptoms, IBS severity, and constipation severity.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 50mg BID | Experimental | Drug: TenapanorTenapanor, 50mg BID (100mg total) |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboPlacebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Males or females aged 18 to 75 years, inclusive
- Females must be of non-childbearing potential; If of child-bearing potential, must have negative pregnancy test and confirm the use of one of the appropriate means of contraception
- Males must agree to use appropriate methods of barrier contraception or have documented surgical sterilization
- Subject meets definition of IBS-C using Rome III Criteria for the Diagnosis of IBS
- A colonoscopy based on AGA guidelines; every 10 years at ≥50 years old
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Functional diarrhea as defined by Rome III criteria
- IBS with diarrhea (IBS-D), mixed IBS (IBS-M), or unsubtyped IBS as defined by Rome III criteria
- Diagnosis or treatment of any clinically symptomatic biochemical or structural abnormality of the GI tract within 6 months prior to screening, or active disease within 6 months prior to screening; including but not limited to cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, diverticulitis, duodenal ulcer, erosive esophagitis, gastric ulcer, pancreatitis (within 12 months of screening), cholelithiasis, amyloidosis, ileus, non-controlled GERD, gastrointestinal obstruction or carcinoid syndrome.
- Potential CNS cause of constipation (e.g., Parkinson's disease, spinal cord injury, or multiple sclerosis)
- Subject has a history or current evidence of laxative abuse (in the clinical judgment of physician)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TenapanorAlso: RDX5791, AZD1722 | Drug | 50mg BID |
| Placebo | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Subjects With Overall Response for 6 Out of 12 Weeks
Time frame: First 12 weeks
An overall responder is defined as a weekly responder for the first 6/12 weeks where both CSBM and abdominal pain response criteria were met for the week. The CSBM response criteria are defined as an increase of one or more change in average weekly CSBMs from baseline. The definition of a CSBM is as follows: A CSBM is a spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) for which the subject responds "yes" to the following question; "Did you feel like you completely emptied your bowels?" The abdominal pain response criterion is defined as a decrease of 30% or more of percent change in average weekly worst abdominal pain from baseline.
8 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Subjects With Overall Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) Response for 6 Out of 12 Weeks
Time frame: First 12 weeks
Percentage of Subjects With Overall Abdominal Pain Response for 6 Out of 12 Weeks
Time frame: First 12 weeks
Percentage of Subjects With Overall Response for 13 Out of 26 Weeks
Time frame: 26 weeks
Percentage of Subjects With Overall Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) Response for 13 Out of 26 Weeks
Time frame: 26 weeks
Percentage of Subjects With Overall Abdominal Pain Response for 13 Out of 26 Weeks
Time frame: 26 weeks
Percentage of Subjects With Overall Response for 9 Out of 12 Weeks
Time frame: First 12 weeks
Percentage of Subjects With Overall Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) Response for 9 Out of 12 Weeks
Time frame: First 12 weeks
Percentage of Subjects With Overall Abdominal Pain Response for 9 Out of 12 Weeks
Time frame: First 12 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Apr 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41601848Lacy BE, Shin AS, Cangemi DJ, Yang Y, Zhao S, Rosenbaum DP. Tenapanor is associated with earlier and sustained symptom relief in IBS-C: a post hoc analysis. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2026 Jan 24;19:17562848251414831. doi: 10.1177/17562848251414831. eCollection 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37668173Lembo AJ, Friedenberg KA, Fogel RP, Edelstein S, Zhao S, Yang Y, Rosenbaum DP, Chey WD. Long-term safety of tenapanor in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation in the T3MPO-3 study. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023 Nov;35(11):e14658. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14658. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33337659Chey WD, Lembo AJ, Yang Y, Rosenbaum DP. Efficacy of Tenapanor in Treating Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation: A 26-Week, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Trial (T3MPO-2). Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun 1;116(6):1294-1303. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001056.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Constipation Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
"Efficacy and Safety of Linaclotide in Chronic Constipation"
Chronic Idiopathic Constipation, Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS-C)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Soluble and Osmotic Fibre (SOLOS) Diet for Constipation
Constipation, Constipation - Functional
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
David P Rosenbaum, Ph.D. study chair
Ardelyx, Inc.
117 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Tenapanor in people with Constipation Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome, run by Ardelyx at 117 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 117 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Apr 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Subjects With Overall Response for 6 Out of 12 Weeks (time frame: First 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02686138, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Apr 2020.