AzTrials
AzTrials

Ankylosing SpondylitisNCT02687620

Does Immunogenicity Have an Influence on the Efficacy of Anti-TNF Therapy in Patients With AS: An Inception Cohort Study

An observational study of Ankylosing Spondylitis and Axial Spondyloarthritis, run by Izmir Katip Celebi University at 13 sites in Turkey (Türkiye).

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this prospective cohort study is to evaluate the influence of serum drug levels and development of anti-drug antibodies on clinical response to anti-TNF agents in ankylosing spondylitis(AS) treatment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
How many people
180 participants
Where
13 sitesTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
Sep 2014to Apr 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Three hundred and fifty consecutive AS patients fulfilling the modified New York criteria for the classification of AS, and with a new anti-TNF agent prescription (either for the first time or switched) in the last two weeks period will be included. Treatment with anti-TNF agents will be in accordance with the regulations of Turkish Social Security Agency (SGK) on the initiation and continuation of anti-TNF agents in AS, as well as ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of AS.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients whom are receiving their first anti-TNF treatment(not switch)
  • Ankylosing spondylitis diagnosis according to modified New York Criteria
  • Patients whom were older than 18 years old on anti-TNF initiation

Who cannot join

  • Spondyloarthritis other than AS
  • HIV positive or malignancy
  • Being treated with another biological drug prior to study

Trial locations and contacts

13 sites in 1 country.

13 sites in 1 country

Turkey (Türkiye)13 sites
  • Cukurova University School of Medicine

    Adana

  • Ankara İbn-i Sina University School of Medicine

    Ankara

  • Gülhane Askeri Tıp Akademisi School of Medicine

    Ankara

  • Hacettepe University School of Medicine

    Ankara

  • Adnan Menderes University School of Medicine

    Aydin

  • Fırat University School of Medicine

    Elâzığ

  • Osman Gazi University School of Medicine

    Eskişehir

  • Goztepe Training and Research Hospital

    Istanbul

  • Istanbul University Cerrahpasa School of Medicine

    Istanbul

  • Istanbul University Istanbul School of Medicine

    Istanbul

  • Ege University School of Medicine

    Izmir

  • İzmir Katip Celebi University School of Medicine

    Izmir

  • Kocaeli University School of Medicine

    Kocaeli

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Does Immunogenicity Have an Influence on the Efficacy of Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor (Anti-TNF) Therapy in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS): An Inception Cohort Study

The purpose of this prospective cohort study is to evaluate the influence of serum drug levels and development of anti-drug antibodies on clinical response to anti-TNF agents in ankylosing spondylitis(AS) treatment. Secondary aims are to assess the demographic, clinical and laboratory variables associated with the development of anti-TNF drug antibodies at baseline or disease course and to reveal the impact of anti-drug antibodies on long-term efficacy or safety in particular drug survival in AS patients treated in daily clinical practice.

Read the detailed description

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease that predominantly affects sacroiliac joints and spine. It is the prototype of spondyloarthritides (SpA) and one of the most common rheumatic diseases. Sacroiliitis is the earliest manifestation of disease and accompanying with spinal involvement cause inflammatory back pain (IBP). IBP usually starts insidiously in the early adulthood and typically it is felt deep in the buttock and/or lower lumbar regions. It improves with activity and returns with the rest and is usually accompanied by morning stiffness lasting at least 30 minutes. Involvement of the spine in patients with AS is usually not limited to the sacroiliac joints and lumbar region and usually it extends up to the thoracic and cervical segment. Currently the only sign that is diagnostic for AS is radiographic sacroiliitis. However radiography detects structural changes and take up to ten years to appear unequivocally.

In some patients bone tenderness due to enthesitis may be the primary complaint. Arthritis in the hips and shoulders occur in some patients and is associated with worse prognosis. Typical arthritis pattern in AS patients is asymmetric and usually involves the lower extremity joints. There are several extra-articular features of AS and the most common is acute anterior uveitis.

Until recently treatment options for AS were limited and based on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), traditional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for the rheumatoid arthritis and physical therapy. The last decade witnessed a major advance in AS therapy with the use of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents. Anti-TNF agents have a substantial effect not only the axial disease but also in peripheral arthritis, enthesitis and extra-articular features (like psoriasis and inflammatory bowel disease). Currently there are four anti-TNF agents approved for AS: (1) infliximab which is a monoclonal chimeric antibody and given at a dose of 5 mg/kg every 6-8 weeks; (2) etanercept which is human TNF receptor fusion protein and administered subcutaneously at a dose of 50 mg/once a week; (3) adalimumab which is a humanized monoclonal antibody and administered as subcutaneous injection at a dose of 40 mg fortnightly; and (4) golimumab which is a fully human monoclonal antibody and administered subcutaneously at a dose of 50 mg once a month.

Since there is no head-to-head studies comparing the anti-TNF agents in the treatment of AS patients there is no ranking for the prescription of anti-TNF agents. Mixed treatment comparisons (that is statistical model allowing the simultaneous multiple meta-analysis of different pair-wise comparisons) between infliximab, adalimumab and etanercept did not show a statistically significant difference. Indeed similar improvements in Bath ankylosing spondylitis activity index (BASDAI 50) scores and ASAS partial remission (between 45.2% to 51.0% BASDAI 50 and 22.1% to 22.4% for partial remission) have been reported in randomized controlled clinical trials.

Although many AS patients respond very well to anti-TNF therapy, a considerable amount of them do not and additionally a significant proportion of patients have to stop their treatment. In clinical practice the reported 1-year and 2-year drug survival rates for anti-TNF agents are 70-85% and 60-75%, respectively.Moreover in a substantial proportion of patients either increase in the administered dosage or dosing frequency have become necessary. Therefore factors, which can predict the response or related with the primary or secondary non-response for anti-TNF treatment have a growing attention among treating specialists. In a study providing an overview of clinical trials and observational studies showed that increased acute phase reactants, higher disease activity, functional status, younger age, and HLA-B27 positivity were independent baseline predictors of response to anti-TNF treatment and increased acute phase reactants, presence of peripheral arthritis, and male sex were the predictors of long-term drug survival.

Immunogenicity refers to development of antibodies by the adaptive immune system in response to foreign substances. The development of anti-drug antibodies were extensively studied in rheumatoid arthritis and it was shown that anti-drug antibodies has a varying impact on the clinical efficacy depending on whether these antibodies are neutralizing or non-neutralizing. Recent review demonstrated that neutralizing antibodies are associated with a reduced chance of achieving a minimal disease activity or clinical remission, decreased drug survival, increased dose escalation and adverse drug reactions in RA patients. However data regarding the immunogenicity in patients treated with AS is scarce and somewhat controversial. In a small study including 38 AS patients treated with infliximab de Vries et al showed that anti-infliximab antibodies was found significantly more often (59% vs 5%) and mean serum through infliximab levels were significantly lower in ASAS20 non-responders. In the above-mentioned study infusion reactions were also seemed to be associated with the development of anti-drug antibodies. In another study de Vries et al (26) were found no antibodies to etanercept and similar serum etanercept levels in responder and non-responder AS patients (n=53). Same group also observed that anti-adalimumab antibodies were become detectable in 31% of AS (n=35) patients in 6 months period and this corresponded with diminished serum drug levels.

Arends et al reported that 0 to 30% of AS patients (n=60) developed anti-drug antibodies during one year of follow-up of anti-TNF treatment and patients with anti-IFN or anti-ADA antibodies had significantly lower drug serum levels.

The objective of this prospective cohort study is to evaluate the influence of serum drug levels and development of anti-drug antibodies on clinical response to anti-TNF agents. The assessment of demographic, clinical and laboratory variables associated with the development of anti-TNF drug antibodies at baseline or disease course will be also evaluated. Via this study, it might also be possible to reveal the impact of anti-drug antibodies on long-term efficacy or safety in particular drug survival in AS patients treated in daily clinical practice.

Medical subject headings
Spondylitis, Ankylosing, Axial Spondyloarthritis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02687620
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AS patients receiving Anti-TNF treatmentThree hundred and fifty consecutive AS patients fulfilling the modified New York criteria for the classification of AS (5), and with a new anti-TNF agent prescription (either for the first time or switched) in the last two weeks period will be included. Treatment with anti-TNF agents will be in accordance with the regulations of Turkish Social Security Agency (SGK) on the initiation and continuation of anti-TNF agents in AS, as well as ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of AS (29, 30).

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Serum drug levels

    It will be measured in mg/L or other measurement levels by using ELISA

    Measured: 0, 3, 6 12 and 24 months of the study

  2. Anti-drug antibody levels

    It will be measured in AU/mL or other measurement levels by using ELISA

    Measured: 0, 3, 6 12 and 24 months of the study

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)

    In order to evaluate function BASDAI will be evaluated in numeric rating scale (0-10)

    Measured: every third months up to 104 weeks

  2. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)

    In order to evaluate function BASFI will be evaluated in numeric rating scale (0-10)

    Measured: every third months up to 104 weeks

  3. Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (ASDAS)

    ASDAS-CRP (the preferred version) will be calculated by using the following formula:

    0.12 X Back pain + 0.06 X Duration of morning stiffness + 0.11 X Patient global + 0.07 X Peripheral pain / swelling + 0.58 X Ln (CRP + 1)

    Measured: every third months (if available) up to 104 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Feb 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2014
  3. Primary completionApr 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completionApr 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
180 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02687620
Sponsor's protocol ID
KCU-12032014
Status last verified
Feb 2021
First submitted
3 Feb 2016
Last updated
18 Feb 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Braun J, Bollow M, Remlinger G, Eggens U, Rudwaleit M, Distler A, Sieper J. Prevalence of spondylarthropathies in HLA-B27 positive and negative blood donors. Arthritis Rheum. 1998 Jan;41(1):58-67. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199801)41:13.0.CO;2-G.

    PubMed 9433870
  • Onen F, Akar S, Birlik M, Sari I, Khan MA, Gurler O, Ergor A, Manisali M, Akkoc N. Prevalence of ankylosing spondylitis and related spondyloarthritides in an urban area of Izmir, Turkey. J Rheumatol. 2008 Feb;35(2):305-9. Epub 2007 Dec 15.

    PubMed 18085733
  • Sieper J, Braun J, Rudwaleit M, Boonen A, Zink A. Ankylosing spondylitis: an overview. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 Dec;61 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii8-18. doi: 10.1136/ard.61.suppl_3.iii8.

    PubMed 12381506
  • Burgos-Vargas R, Braun J. Inflammatory back pain. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2012 Aug;38(3):487-99. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2012.08.014. Epub 2012 Sep 14.

    PubMed 23083750
  • van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 1984 Apr;27(4):361-8. doi: 10.1002/art.1780270401.

    PubMed 6231933
  • Feldtkeller E, Khan MA, van der Heijde D, van der Linden S, Braun J. Age at disease onset and diagnosis delay in HLA-B27 negative vs. positive patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int. 2003 Mar;23(2):61-6. doi: 10.1007/s00296-002-0237-4. Epub 2002 Sep 3.

    PubMed 12634937
  • Mau W, Zeidler H, Mau R, Majewski A, Freyschmidt J, Stangel W, Deicher H. Clinical features and prognosis of patients with possible ankylosing spondylitis. Results of a 10-year followup. J Rheumatol. 1988 Jul;15(7):1109-14.

    PubMed 3262757
  • Rudwaleit M, Khan MA, Sieper J. The challenge of diagnosis and classification in early ankylosing spondylitis: do we need new criteria? Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Apr;52(4):1000-8. doi: 10.1002/art.20990. No abstract available.

    PubMed 15818678
  • Braun J, Deodhar A, Dijkmans B, Geusens P, Sieper J, Williamson P, Xu W, Visvanathan S, Baker D, Goldstein N, van der Heijde D; Ankylosing Spondylitis Study for the Evaluation of Recombinant Infliximab Therapy Study Group. Efficacy and safety of infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis over a two-year period. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Sep 15;59(9):1270-8. doi: 10.1002/art.24001.

    PubMed 18759257
  • van der Heijde D, Kivitz A, Schiff MH, Sieper J, Dijkmans BA, Braun J, Dougados M, Reveille JD, Wong RL, Kupper H, Davis JC Jr; ATLAS Study Group. Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Jul;54(7):2136-46. doi: 10.1002/art.21913.

    PubMed 16802350
  • Arends S, Brouwer E, van der Veer E, Groen H, Leijsma MK, Houtman PM, Th A Jansen TL, Kallenberg CG, Spoorenberg A. Baseline predictors of response and discontinuation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha blocking therapy in ankylosing spondylitis: a prospective longitudinal observational cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011 Jun 20;13(3):R94. doi: 10.1186/ar3369.

    PubMed 21689401
  • Glintborg B, Ostergaard M, Krogh NS, Dreyer L, Kristensen HL, Hetland ML. Predictors of treatment response and drug continuation in 842 patients with ankylosing spondylitis treated with anti-tumour necrosis factor: results from 8 years' surveillance in the Danish nationwide DANBIO registry. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Nov;69(11):2002-8. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.124446. Epub 2010 May 28.

    PubMed 20511613
  • Kristensen LE, Karlsson JA, Englund M, Petersson IF, Saxne T, Geborek P. Presence of peripheral arthritis and male sex predicting continuation of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in ankylosing spondylitis: an observational prospective cohort study from the South Swedish Arthritis Treatment Group Register. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 Oct;62(10):1362-9. doi: 10.1002/acr.20258.

    PubMed 20506310
  • Kristensen LE, Geborek P, Saxne T. Dose escalation of infliximab therapy in arthritis patients is related to diagnosis and concomitant methotrexate treatment: observational results from the South Swedish Arthritis Treatment Group register. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009 Mar;48(3):243-5. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken467. Epub 2008 Dec 23.

    PubMed 19106164
  • Alawadhi A, Alawneh K, Alzahrani ZA. The effect of neutralizing antibodies on the sustainable efficacy of biologic therapies: what's in it for African and Middle Eastern rheumatologists. Clin Rheumatol. 2012 Sep;31(9):1281-7. doi: 10.1007/s10067-012-2040-2. Epub 2012 Aug 9.

    PubMed 22875700

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Ankylosing Spondylitis and Axial Spondyloarthritis, run by Izmir Katip Celebi University at 13 sites in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 13 sites in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Serum drug levels (time frame: 0, 3, 6 12 and 24 months of the study). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02687620, which also lists 20 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Feb 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in